Book contents
- Aristotle on Earlier Greek Psychology
- Aristotle on Earlier Greek Psychology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction to Hylomorphic Psychology
- Part I Aristotle’s Methodology of Psychological Inquiry
- Part II Earlier Theories of Psychological Motion
- Part III Earlier Theories of Psychological Cognition
- Part IV Earlier Theories and Two Psychological Puzzles
- Conclusion: Hylomorphic Psychology as a Dualism
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 March 2019
Book contents
- Aristotle on Earlier Greek Psychology
- Aristotle on Earlier Greek Psychology
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction to Hylomorphic Psychology
- Part I Aristotle’s Methodology of Psychological Inquiry
- Part II Earlier Theories of Psychological Motion
- Part III Earlier Theories of Psychological Cognition
- Part IV Earlier Theories and Two Psychological Puzzles
- Conclusion: Hylomorphic Psychology as a Dualism
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Aristotle on Earlier Greek PsychologyThe Science of Soul, pp. 228 - 242Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Primary Sources
Barnes, J. (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, D. (2002). Aristotle De Anima: Books II and II (With Passages from Book I). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hett, W. (1986). Aristotle: On the Soul, Parva Naturalia, On Breath (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Joachim, H. (1922). Aristotle on Coming-To-Be and Passing-Away. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. (2017). Aristotle: De Anima. Translated with Introduction and Notes. Indianapolis, IN/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Ross, W. (1936). Aristotle’s Physics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. (1949). Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. (1961). Aristotle De Anima: Edited, with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, C. (2016). Aristotle: De Anima, Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J. (1931). De Anima, trans. Smith, J., in The Works of Aristotle, vol. 3, ed. Ross, W.D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Curd, P. (2010). Anaxagoras of Clazomenae: Fragments and Testimonia. A Text and Translation with Notes and Essays. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1951). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 6th edn, revised by Kranz, Walter, 3 vols. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Graham, D. (2010). The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. (1994). Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Kirk, G., Raven, J., and Schofield, M. (1983). The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKirahan, R. (2010). Philosophy before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary, 2nd edn. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (2005). The Fragments of Anaxagoras: Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1999). The Atomists Leucippus and Democritus: Fragments: A Text and Translation. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Aeschylus, . (1955). Septem Quae Supersunt Tragoedias, ed. Page, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. (1959). In Aristotelis librum de Anima commentarium, ed. Pirotta, M.. Taurini: Marietti. [= In De an.]Google Scholar
Augustine, . (1933). De Quantitate Animae: The Measure of the Soul. Latin text, trans. Tourscher, F.. London: B. Herder.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. (1927). Tusculan Disputations (Loeb Classical Library). London: W. Heineman. [=Tusc. Disp.]Google Scholar
Epicurus, . (1926): Epicurus: The Extant Remains, with Short Critical Apparatus, ed. and trans. Bailey, C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Euripides, . (1984). Euripides Fabulae, Vol. 1, ed. Diggle, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W., and Schütrumpf, E. (2001). Dicaearchus of Messana: Text, Translation, and Discussion (Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities). London: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Galen, . (1979). Galen on the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato (Corpus Medicorum Graecorum; V.4, 1,2), ed. and trans. De Lacy, P.. Berlin: Academie–Verlag. [=PHP]Google Scholar
Heinze, R. (1892). Xenocrates: Darstellung der Lehre und Sammlung der Fragmente. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Philoponus, . (1991). Philoponus: On Aristotle on the Intellect (De Anima 3.4–8), trans. Charlton, W.. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . (1976). De animae Procreation in Timaeo, trans. by Cherniss, Harold, in: Plutarch’s Moralia, Vol. XIII, Part 1. London: Loeb.Google Scholar
Simplicius, . (1995). On Aristotle’s on the Soul 1.1–2.4, trans. Urmson, J.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Waszink, J. (2010). Quinti Septimi Florentis Tertulliani De Anima. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackrill, J. (1972/1973). ‘Aristotle’s Definitions of Psuche’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73:119–33.Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. (1981). ‘Aristotle’s Theory of Definition: Some Questions on Posterior Analytics II 8–10’, in Berti, (1981):359–84.Google Scholar
Algra, K., van der Horst, P., and Runia, D. (1996). Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balme, D. (1941). ‘Greek Science and Mechanism II: The Atomists’. Classical Quarterly 35:23–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltussen, H. (1996). ‘A “Dialectical” Argument in De Anima A 4: On Aristotle’s Use of Topoi in Systematic Contexts’, in Algra, van der Horst, and Runia (1996):333–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltussen, H. (2000). Theophrastus against the Preoscratics and Plato: Peripatetic Dialectic in the De Sensibus. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, A. (1984). ‘Aristoxenus’ Theorems and the Foundations of Harmonic Science’. Ancient Philosophy 4:23–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, A. (2007). The Science of Harmonics in Classical Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (1971/1972). ‘Aristotle’s Concept of Mind’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 72:101–14.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1980). ‘Aristotle and the Methods of Ethics’. Revue internationale de philosophie 133/134: 490–511.Google Scholar
Barney, R. (2012). ‘History and Dialectic (Metaphysics A 3, 983a24–4b8)’, in Steel, and Primavesi, (2012):66–104.Google Scholar
Bartoš, H. (2006). ‘Varieties of the Ancient Greek Body Soul Distinction’. Rhizai 1: 59–78.Google Scholar
Bastit, M. (1996). ‘Qu’est-ce qu’une Partie de l’Âme pour Aristote?’, in Viano, (1996):13–36.Google Scholar
Beare, J. (1906). Greek Theories of Elementary Cognition: From Alcmaeon to Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Benson, H. (2003). ‘The Method of Hypothesis in the Meno’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 18:95–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, S. (2002). ‘Aristotle on Pneuma and Animal Self-Motion’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 23:85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, S. (2003). ‘Ancient Automata and Mechanical Explanation’. Phronesis 48:344–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berti, E. (1981). Aristotle on Science: Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium Aristotelicum. Padua, Italy: Editrice Antenore.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. (2004). The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betegh, G. (2009). ‘The Limits of the Soul: Heraclitus B45 DK. Its Text and Interpretation’, in Hülsz, (2009):391–414.Google Scholar
Blair, G. (1967). ‘The Meaning of “Energeia” and “Entelecheia” in Aristotle’. International Philosophical Quarterly 7:101–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1998). ‘The Inadvertent Conception and Late Birth of the Free-Will Problem’. Phronesis 43:133–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2000). ‘Did Epicurus Discover the Free Will Problem?’ Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 19: 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogen, J. (1996). ‘Fire in the Belly: Aristotelian Elements, Organisms, and Chemical Compounds’, in Lewis, and Bolton, (1996):183–216.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. (1987). ‘Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals’, in Gotthelf, and Lennox, (1987):120–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, R. (1991). ‘Aristotle’s Method in Natural Science: Physics I’, in Judson, (1991):1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, R. (1994). ‘The Problem of Dialectical Reasoning (Συλλογισμός)’. Ancient Philosophy 14:99–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonitz, H. (1955). Index Aristotelicus, ed. Meyer, Jürgen Bona. Graz, Austria: Akademische Druck-U. Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Bordt, M. (2011). ‘Why Aristotle’s God Is Not the Unmoved Mover’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40:91–109.Google Scholar
Bos, A. (2007). ‘Aristotle on Dissection of Plants and Animals and His Concept of the Instrumental Soul–body’. Ancient Philosophy 27:95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, A., and Wildberg, C. (2009). New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowin, J. (2011). ‘Aristotle on Various Types of Alteration in De Anima II 5’. Phronesis 56:138–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, D. (1997). ‘Aristotle on Perception: The Dual-Logos Theory’. Apeiron 30:143–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brancacci, A., and Morel, P.-M. (2007). Democritus: Science, the Arts, and the Care of the Soul – Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Democritus. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1977). The Psychology of Aristotle, ed. and trans. George, R.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brody, B. (1972). ‘Towards an Aristotelian Theory of Scientific Explanation’. Philosophy of Science 39:20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronstein, D. (2016). Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkert, W. (1972). Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1992a). ‘Is an Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind Still Credible? A Draft’, in Nussbaum, and Rorty, (1992):15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1992b). ‘How Much Happens When Aristotle Sees Red and Hears Middle C? Remarks on De Anima 2.7–8’, in Nussbaum, and Rorty, (1992):421–34.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (2004). ‘Aristotle on the Foundations of Sublunary Physics’, in de Haas and Mansfeld (2004):7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (2008). Aristotle’s Divine Intellect. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, J. (2018). ‘Does the Soul Weave? Reconsidering De Anima 1.4, 408a29–b18’. Phronesis 63:25–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. (1993). ‘Aristotle and Supervenience’. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (Supplement):107–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. (1997). ‘Epiphenomenalisms, Ancient and Modern’. The Philosophical Review 106:309–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. (1999). ‘Aristotle’s Two Intellects: A Modest Proposal’. Phronesis 44:199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. (2000). ‘Aristotle’s Argument for Why the Understanding Is Not Compounded with the Body’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 16:135–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. (2005). ‘The Spirit and the Letter: Aristotle on Perception’, in Salles, (2005):245–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, A. (1997). ‘Did Democritus Ascribe Weight to Atoms?’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75:279–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R. (2009). Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, D. (2005). Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (1935). Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (1944). Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Chiba, K. (2012). ‘Aristotle on Heuristic Inquiry and Demonstration of What it Is’, in Shields, (2012):171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleary, J. (1994). ‘Phainomena in Aristotle’s Methodology’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2: 61–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code, A. (1987). ‘Soul as Efficient Cause in Aristotle’s Embryology’. Philosophical Topics 15:51–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code, A. (1991). ‘Aristotle, Searle, and the Mind–Body Problem’, in Lepore, and Van Gulick, (1991):105–13.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (1992). ‘Hylomorphism and Functionalism’, in Nussbaum, and Rorty, (1992):57–73.Google Scholar
Cohoe, C. (2013). ‘Why the Intellect Cannot Have a Bodily Organ: De Anima 3.4’. Phronesis 58:344–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohoe, C. (2016). ‘When and Why Understanding Needs Phantasmata: A Moderate Interpretation of Aristotle’s De Memoria and De Anima on the Role of Images in Intellectual Activities’. Phronesis 61:337–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collobert, C. (2002). ‘Aristotle’s Review of the Presocratics: Is Aristotle Finally a Historian of Philosophy?’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 40:281–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coope, U. (2005). Time for Aristotle: Physics IV. 10–14. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. (2012). ‘Conclusion – and Retrospect: Metaphysics A.10’, in Steel, and Primavesi, (2012):333–64.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K., and Gregoric, P. (2010). ‘Separability vs. Difference: Parts and Capacities of the Soul in Aristotle’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39:81–120.Google Scholar
Crane, T., and Patterson, S. (2000). The History of the Mind Body Problem. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Curd, P. (2010). Anaxagoras of Clazomenae: Fragments and Testimonia. A Text and Translation with Notes and Essays by Patricia Curd. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Curd, P., and Graham, D. (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, R. (1996). ‘Keeping Body and Soul Together: On Aristotle’s Theory of Forms’, in Wians, (1996):249–87.Google Scholar
Danieli, M. (1984). Zum Problem der Traditionsaneignung bei Aristoteles: Untersucht am Beispiel von De Anima I. Königstein/Ts: Anton Hain.Google Scholar
Darcus, S. (1977). ‘Daimon Parallels the Holy Phren in Empedocles’. Phronesis 22:175–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Haas, F., and Mansfeld, J. (2004). Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book 1: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, R. (1984). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, eds. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [=CSM]Google Scholar
Destrée, P., Salles, R., and Zingano, M. (2014). What Is Up to Us?: Studies on Agency and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy: Sankt Augustin: Academia Richarz.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1985). ‘Xenocrates’ Metaphysics: Fr. 15 (Heinze) Re-Examined’. Ancient Philosophy 5:47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, J. (1996). The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C.–A.D. 2020. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (2003). The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy (347–274 B.C.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Distelzweig, P. (2013). ‘The Intersection of the Mathematical and Natural Sciences: The Subordinate Sciences in Aristotle’. Apeiron 46:85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driscoll, J. (1992). ‘The Anaxagorean Assumption in Aristotle’s Account of Mind’, in Preus, and Anton, (1992):273–92.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (1972). ‘Necessity, Chance, and Freedom in the Early Atomists’. Phoenix 26:342–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englert, W. (1987). Epicurus on the Swerve and Voluntary Action. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Evans, J. (1977). Aristotle’s Concept of Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. (2009). ‘The Scope and Unity of Aristotle’s Investigation of the Soul’, in Van Riel, and Destrée, (2009):167–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, M. (1988). ‘Meno’s Paradox and De Re Knowledge in Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstration’. History of Philosophy Quarterly 5:99–117.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, M. (1991). The Origins of Aristotelian Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feser, E. (2013). Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, D. (1992). ‘The Cognitive Role of Phantasia in Aristotle’, in Nussbaum, and Rorty, (1992):279–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, D. (1996). ‘The Philosophical Economy of Plato’s Psychology: Rationality and Common Concepts in the Timaeus’, in Frede, and Stryker, (1996):29–58.Google Scholar
Frede, D. (2012). ‘The Endoxon Mystique: What Endoxa Are and What They Are Not’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43:184–215.Google Scholar
Frede, D., and Reis, B. (2009). Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, D., and Stryker, G. (1996). Rationality in Greek Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, M. (1992). ‘On Aristotle’s Conception of the Soul’, in Nussbaum, and Rorty, (1992):93–107.Google Scholar
Frede, M., and Charles, D. (2000). Aristotle’s Metaphysics Lambda: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, M., and Long, A. (2011). A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Freeland, C. (1990). ‘Scientific Explanation and Empirical Data in Aristotle’s Meteorology’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 8:67–102.Google Scholar
Furley, D. (1967). Two Studies in the Greek Atomists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelber, J. (2010). ‘Form and Inheritance in Aristotle’s Embryology’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39:183–212.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. (2004). ‘The Unity of Intellect in Aristotle’s De Anima. Phronesis 49:348–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M. (1994). Self-Motion: From Aristotle to Newton. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, M., and Pellegrin, P. (2006). A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin, O. (1996). Explaining an Eclipse: Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics 2.1–10. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotthelf, A. (1985). Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical and Historical Studies. Pittsburgh, PA: Mathesis Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. (1989). ‘Teleology and Spontaneous Generation in Aristotle: A Discussion’. Apeiron 22:181–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotthelf, A., and Lennox, J. (1987). Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, D. (2004). ‘Was Anaxagoras a Reductionist?’. Ancient Philosophy 24:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, H. (1995a). ‘Aristotle on the Subjecthood of Form.’ Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 13:135–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, H. (1995b) ‘The Subjecthood of Form: A Reply to Shields.’ Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 13:177–85.Google Scholar
Gregoric, P. (2007). Aristotle on the Common Sense. Oxford Aristotle Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, W. (1957). ‘Aristotle as Historian’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 77:35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, W. (1962–1981). A History of Greek Philosophy, 6 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. (1998). Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heinaman, R. (1990). ‘Aristotle and the Mind–Body Problem’. Phronesis 35:83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinaman, R. (2007). ‘Actuality, Potentiality and De Anima II.5’. Phronesis 52:139–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, S. (1994). ‘Parts, Compounds, and Substantial Unity’, in Scaltsas, Charles, and Gill (1994):129–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidel, W. (1906). ‘Qualitative Change in Pre-Socratic Philosophy’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 19:333–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidel, W. (1913). ‘On Certain Fragments of the Pre-Socratics: Critical Notes and Elucidations’. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 48:681–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horky, P. (2013). ‘Theophrastus on Platonic and “Pythagorean” Imitation’. Classical Quarterly 63:686–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huby, P. (1967). ‘The First Discovery of the Freewill Problem’. Philosophy 42:353–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hülsz, E. (2009). Nuevos ensayos sobre Heráclito. Actas del Segundo Symposium Heracliteum. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Hussey, E. (1991). ‘Aristotle’s Mathematical Physics: A Reconstruction’, in Judson, (1991):213–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussey, E. (2012). ‘Aristotle on Earlier Natural Science’, in Shields, (2012):17–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2005). ‘Empedocles on Colour and Colour Vision’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29:1–37.Google Scholar
Ilievski, P. (1993). ‘The Origin and Semantic Development of the Term Harmony’. Illinois Classical Studies 18:19–29.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. (1987). ‘Ways to First Principles: Aristotle’s Methods of Discovery’. Philosophical Topics 15:109–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, W. (1934). Aristotle: Fundamentals of the History of His Development, trans. Robinson, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. (1997). Aristotle on the Sense-Organs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, T. (2008). ‘Soul as an Inner Principle of Change: The Basis of Aristotle’s Psychological Naturalism’, in Scott, (2008):276–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, T. (2012). The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (2009). ‘Spontaneity, Democritean Causality, and Freedom’. Elenchos 30:5–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (2014). ‘Changing Our Minds: Democritus on What Is Up to Us’, in Destrée, Salles and Zingano, (2014):1–17.Google Scholar
Judson, L. (1991). Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judson, L. (2005). ‘Aristotelian Teleology’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29:341–66.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. (1960). ‘Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’ Doctrine of the Soul’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42:3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kakkuri-Knuuttila, M. (2005). ‘The Relevance of Dialectic Skills to Philosophical Inquiry in Aristotle’. Rhizai 2:31–74.Google Scholar
Kamtekar, R. (2009). ‘Knowing by Likeness in Empedocles’. Phronesis 54:215–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1996). Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Pluhar, W.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing. [=CPR]Google Scholar
Kelsey, S. (2003). ‘Aristotle’s Definition of Nature’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25:59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsey, S. (2010). ‘Hylomorphism in Aristotle’s Physics’. Ancient Philosophy 30:107–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. (2006). Common to Body and Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behavior in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin: Walter de Gryter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosman, A. (1973). ‘Understanding, Explanation, and Insight in the Posterior Analytics’, in Lee, Mourelatos and Rorty, (1973):374–92.Google Scholar
Kupreeva, I. (2004). ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on Mixture and Growth’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 27:297–334.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (1993). ‘Mind’s Crisis. On Anaxagoras’ ΝΟΥΣ’. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 31:19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laks, A., and Rashed, M. (2004). Aristote et le mouvement des animaux. Lille, France: Presses Universitaires Du Septentrion.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, R. (2000). ‘The Musical, the Magical and the Mathematical Soul’, in Crane, and Patterson, (2000):13–33.Google Scholar
Lee, E., Mourelatos, A., and Rorty, R. (1973). Exegesis and Argument. Assen, the Netherlands: van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Lee, M. (2005). Epistemology after Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. (1989). Philosophical Essays, trans. Ariew, R. and Garber, D.. Indianapolis, IN: Hacket Publishing. [=PE]Google Scholar
Lennox, J. (1982). ‘Teleology, Chance, and Aristotle’s Theory of Spontaneous Generation’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 20:219–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, J. (2014). ‘Aristotle on the Emergence of Material Complexity: Meteorology IV and Aristotle’s Biology. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 4:272–305.Google Scholar
Lepore, E., and Van Gulick, R. (1991). John Searle and His Critics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. (1995). ‘Mind’s Knowledge and Powers of Control in Anaxagoras DK B12’. Phronesis 40:125–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leunissen, M. (2010a). ‘Aristotle’s Syllogistic Model of Knowledge and the Biological Sciences: Demonstrating Natural Processes’. Apeiron 43:31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leunissen, M. (2010b). Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, J. (1983). ‘Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Divide’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64:357–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, F. (2003). ‘Is There Room for Anaxagoras in an Aristotelian Theory of Mind?’ Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25:89–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, F., and Bolton, R. (1996). Form, Matter, and Mixture in Aristotle. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G., and Owen, G. (1978). Aristotle on Mind and the Senses: Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium Aristotelicum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. (1966). ‘Thinking and Sense-perception in Empedocles: Mysticism or Materialism?’ Classical Quarterly 16: 256–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. (1999). The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, H. (2007). ‘The Assimilation of Sense to Sense-Object in Aristotle’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33:179–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, G. (2013). ‘The History of Hylomorphism’. Journal of the History of Ideas 74:173–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1990). ‘Doxography and Dialectic: The Sitz in Leben of the Placita’, in Haase, W., and Temporini, H. (eds.), 1990, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, Teil II: Principat, Band 36.4. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter:3056–229.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (2007). ‘Out of Touch: Philoponus as a Source for Democritus’, in Brancacci, and Morel, (2007):277–92.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (2010). ‘Physikai doxai and problêmeta physica in Philosophy and Rhetoric: From Aristotle to Aëtius (and Beyond)’, in Mansfeld, and Runia, (2010):33–97.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J., and Runia, D. (2010). Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer. Volume Three. Studies in the Doxographical Traditions of Ancient Philosophy. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
Mansion, S. (1961b). ‘Le role de l’exposé et de la criticism des philosophies antérieures chez Aristote’, in Mansion, (1961):35–56.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (2014). Aristotle on Perceiving Objects. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (2017). Everything in Everything: Anaxagoras’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A., and Primavesi, O. (1998). L’Empédocle de Strasbourg: (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665–1666). Berlin: Bibliothèque nationale et universitaire de Strasbourg; Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
McDaniel, K. (2009). ‘Ways of Being’, in Chalmers, , Manley, , and Wasserman, (2009):290–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKirahan, R. (1983). ‘Aristotelian Epagoge in Prior Analytics 2.21 and Posterior Analytics 1.1’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 21:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKirahan, R. (1992). Principles and Proofs: Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McPherran, M. (2010). Plato’s Republic: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Menn, S. (1992). ‘Aristotle and Plato on God as Nous and as the Good’. The Review of Metaphysics 45:543–73.Google Scholar
Menn, S. (1995). Plato on God as Nous. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Menn, S. (2002). ‘Aristotle’s Definition of the Soul and the Programme of the De Anima’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 12:83–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, S. (1994). ‘Self-Movement and External Causation’, in Gill, (1994):65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jr., F. (1999). ‘Aristotle’s Philosophy of Soul’. The Review of Metaphysics 53:309–37.Google Scholar
Miller, Jr., F. (2012). ‘Aristotle on the Separability of Mind’, in Shields, (2012):306–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modrak, D. (1991). ‘The Nous-Body Problem in Aristotle’. The Review of Metaphysics 44:755–74.Google Scholar
Morel, P.-M. (1996). Démocrite et la recherché des causes. Paris, France: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Morison, B. (2002). On Location: Aristotle’s Concept of Place. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morison, B. (2004). ‘Self-motion in Physics VIII’, in Laks, and Rashed, (2004):67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, S. (1993). Daidalos and the Origins of Greek Art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. (1984). ‘Aristotle’s Rationalist Account of Qualitative Interaction’. Phronesis 29:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mourelatos, A. (2005). ‘Intrinsic and Relational Properties of Atoms in the Democritean Ontology’, in Salles, (2005):39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mourelatos, A. (2006). ‘The Concept of the Universal in Some Later Pre-Platonic Cosmologists’, in Gill, and Pellegrin, (2006):56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1982). ‘Saving Aristotle’s Appearances’, in Nussbaum, and Schofield, (1982):267–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1984). ‘Aristotelian Dualism: Reply to Howard Robinson’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2:197–207.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M., and Putnam, H. (1992). ‘Changing Aristotle’s Mind’, in Nussbaum, and Rorty, (1992):27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M., and Rorty, A. (1992). Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M., and Schofield, M. (1982). Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G.E.L. Owen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nuyens, F. (1973). L’évolution de la psychologie d’Aristote. Louvain, Belgium: Éditions de l’Institut supérieure de philosophie.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, T. (2005). Epicurus on Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, C. (1987b). Rethinking Early Greek Philosophy: Hippolytus of Rome and the Presocratics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. (2000). ‘Rummaging in the Recycling Bins of Upper Egypt: A Discussion of Martin and O. Primavesi, L’Empédocle de Strasbourg’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18:329–56.Google Scholar
Owen, G. (1968a). Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics (Proceedings of the Third Symposium Aristotelicum). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Owen, G. (1968b). ‘Dialectic and Eristic in the Treatment of the Forms’, in Owen, (1968):103–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peramatzis, M. (2011). Priority in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: University of Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perälä, M. (2018). ‘Aristotle on Perceptual Discrimination’. Phronesis 63:257–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philip, J. (1966). ‘The “Pythagorean” Theory of the Derivation of Magnitudes’. Phoenix 20:32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pines, S. (1961). ‘A New Fragment of Xenocrates and Its Implications’. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 51:3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polansky, R. (2007). Aristotle’s De Anima. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politis, V. (2001). ‘Aristotle’s Account of the Intellect as Pure Capacity’. Ancient Philosophy 21:375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preus, A., and Anton, J. (1992). Essays in Greek Philosophy V: Aristotle’s Ontology. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2008). ‘Empedocles: Physical and Mythical Divinity’, in Curd, and Graham, (2008):250–83.Google Scholar
Pritzl, K. (1994). ‘Opinions as Appearances: Endoxa in Aristotle’. Ancient Philosophy 14:41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purinton, J. S. (1999). ‘Epicurus on “Free Volition” and the Atomic Swerve’. Phronesis 44:253–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quarantotto, D. (2018a). Aristotle’s Physics Book I: A Systematic Exploration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quarantotto, D. (2018b). ‘The Role, Structure, and Status of Aristotle’s Physics I’, in Quarantto, (2018):1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rechenauer, G. (2009). ‘Demokrits Seelenmodell und die Prinzipien der atomistischen Physik’, in Frede, and Reis, (2009):111–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, C. (2012). ‘Aristotle’s Philosophical Method’, in Shields, (2012):150–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renehan, R. (1980). ‘On the Greek Origins of the Concepts Incorporeality and Immateriality’. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 21:105–38.Google Scholar
Salles, R. (2005). Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaltsas, T., Charles, D., and Gill, M. (1994). Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schibli, H. (1993). ‘Xenocrates’ Daemons and the Irrational Soul’. Classical Quarterly 43:143–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1991a). ‘Explanatory Projects in Physics 2.3 and 7’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy (Supplementary Volume) 9:29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1991b). ‘Heraclitus’ Theory of Soul and its Antecedents’, in Everson, (1991):13–34.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1992). ‘Aristotle on the Imagination’, in Nussbaum, and Rorty, (1992):249–77.Google Scholar
Scott, D. (2008). Maieusis. Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1997). The Mystery of Consciousness. New York: The New York Review of Books.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1983). ‘Epicurus’ Refutation of Determinism’, in Συζήτησις: studi sull’ epicureismo greco e romano offerti a Marcello Gigante. Napoli, Italy: G. Macchiaroli:11–51.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2007). Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, C. (1988a). ‘Soul as Subject in Aristotle’s De Anima’. The Classical Quarterly 38:140–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, C. (1988b). ‘Soul and Body in Aristotle’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6:103–37.Google Scholar
Shields, C. (1995a). ‘Intentionality and Isomorphism in Aristotle’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 11:307–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, C. (1995b). ‘The Subjecthood of Souls and Other Forms: A Response to Granger’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 13:161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, C. (2002). Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in the Philosophy of Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, C. (2007). ‘The Peculiar Motion of Aristotelian Souls’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81:139–61.Google Scholar
Shields, C. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, C. (2013). ‘The Phainomenological Method in Aristotle’s Metaphysics’, in Feser, (2013):7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, P. (1901). ‘Aristotle’s De Anima’. The American Journal of Philology 22:149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, P. (1960). The Unity of Plato’s Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (2005). The Fragments of Anaxagoras: Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Silverman, A. (1989). ‘Color and Color-Perception in Aristotle’s De Anima’. Ancient Philosophy 9:271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisko, J. (1999). ‘On Separating the Intellect from the Body: Aristotle’s De anima III.4, 429a10–b5. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 81:249–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisko, J. (2000). ‘Aristotle’s Nous and the Modern Mind’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 16:177–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1960). Aristotle’s System of the Physical World: A Comparison with His Predecessors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1980). Necessity, Cause and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle’s Theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1988). Matter, Space, and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and Their Sequel. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1992). ‘Intentionality and Physiological Processes: Aristotle’s Theory of Sense Perception’, in Nussbaum, and Rorty, (1992):195–225.Google Scholar
Steel, C., and Primavesi, O. (2012). Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarán, L. (1981). Speusippus of Athens: A Critical Study with a Collection of the Related Texts and Commentaries. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, T. (1982). ‘The Soul/Boatman Analogy in Aristotle’s De anima’. Classical Philology 77:97–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trépanier, S. (2014). ‘From Wandering Limbs to Limbless Gods: δαίμων as Substance in Empedocles’. Apeiron 47:172–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upton, T. (1985). ‘The Role of Dialectic and Objections in Aristotelian Science’. Southern Journal of Philosophy 22:241–56.Google Scholar
Van Riel, G., and Destrée, P. (2009). Ancient Perspectives on Aristotle’s De anima. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Viano, C. (1996b). ‘La Doxographie du De Anima (I, 2–5) ou le Contre-modèle de l’Âme’, in Viano, (1996).Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1945). ‘Ethics and Physics in Democritus’. The Philosophical Review 54:578–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Fritz, K. (1943). ‘Νοῦς and Νοεῖν in the Homeric Poems’. Classical Philology 38:79–93.Google Scholar
von Fritz, K. (1945). ‘Νοῦς, Νοεῖν and their Derivatives in Pre-Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras): Part I’. Classical Philology 40:223–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Fritz, K. (1946). ‘Νοῦς, Νοεῖν and their Derivatives in Pre-Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras): Part II’. Classical Philology 41:12–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, J. (1988). ‘Perception and Λόγος in De Anima II.12’. Ancient Philosophy 8:217–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, J. (2008). Aristotle on Homonymy: Dialectic and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. (1990). The Chain of Change: A Study of Aristotle’s Physics VII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waterlow, S. (1998). Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, H. (1938). ‘Democritus’ Theory of Cognition: (A Discussion of Two Aristotelian Passages concerning Democritus)’. The Classical Quarterly 32:47–56.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. (2002). ‘Locomotive Soul: The Parts of Soul in Aristotle’s Scientific Works’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22:141–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wians, W. (1996). Aristotle’s Philosophical Development: Problems and Prospects. Landham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wilkes, K. (1979). ‘Conclusions in the Meno’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61:143–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkes, K. (1992). ‘Psuchē versus the Mind’, in Nussbaum, and Rorty, (1992):109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, C. (1992). ‘Dialectic, Motion, and Perception: De Anima, Book I’, in Nussbaum, and Rorty, (1992):169–83.Google Scholar
Wlodarczyk, M. (2000). ‘Aristotelian Dialectic and the Discovery of Truth.’ Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18:153–210.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. (2008). ‘The Method εξ ὑποθέσεως at Meno 86e1–87d8’. Phronesis 53:35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar