Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T10:51:00.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Gender Quotas As Accessory Equality Measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2018

Éléonore Lépinard
Affiliation:
Université de Lausanne, Switzerland
Ruth Rubio-Marín
Affiliation:
Universidad de Sevilla
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Transforming Gender Citizenship
The Irresistible Rise of Gender Quotas in Europe
, pp. 339 - 423
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Ahern, Kenneth R., and Dittmar, Amy K.. 2012. “The Changing of the Boards: The Value Effect of Massive Exogenous Shock.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (1): 137–97.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Jo, and Walby, Sylvia. 2012. Gender Quotas in Management Boards. Note. Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department, Citizen's Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Available at: www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201202/20120216ATT38420/20120216ATT38420EN.pdf.Google Scholar
Bekhouche, Yasmina, Hausmann, Ricardo, Tyson, Laura D'Andrea, and Zahidi, Saadia. 2015. The Global Gender Gap Report 2015. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Available at: http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2015/.Google Scholar
Birkelund, Gunn E., and Sandnes, Toril. 2003. “Paradoxes of Welfare States and Equal Opportunities: Gender and Managerial Power in Norway and the USA.” Comparative Social Research 21: 203–42.Google Scholar
Borchorst, Anette, Freidenvall, Lenita, Kantola, Johanna, Reisel, Liza, and Teigen, Mari. 2012. “Institutionalizing intersectionality in the Nordic Countries? Anti-Discrimination and Equality in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.” In Institutionalizing Intersectionality? The Changing Nature of European Equality Regimes, edited by Kriszan, Andrea, Skjeie, Hege, and Squires, Judith. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 5988.Google Scholar
Cvijanovic, Anette. 2009. Rettferdig og rimelig? – om kjønnskvotering i styrene i allmennaksjeselskap. Masteroppgave i politikk og samfunnsendring. Fakultet for samfunnsvitenskap, Høgskolen i Bodø.Google Scholar
Dahl, Tove Stang. 1985. Kvinnerett I. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2011. “Women in Nordic Politics – A Continuing Success Story?” In Gender and Power in the Nordic Countries. With Focus on Politics and Business, edited by Kirsti Niskanen. Oslo: NIKK-publication. pp. 5986 Available at: www.nikk.no/wp-content/uploads/NIKKpub2011_broschyr_K%C3%B8n-og-magt_Gender-Power.pdf (Accessed August 2017).Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, and Freidenvall, Lenita. 2005. “Quotas as a ‘Fast Track’ to Equal Representation for Women. Why Scandinavia is No Longer the Model.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 122.Google Scholar
Dale-Olsen, Harald, Schøne, Pål, and Verner, Mette. 2013. “Diversity among Norwegian Boards of Directors: Does a Quota for Women Improve Firm Performance?Feminist Economics 19 (4): 110–35. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2013.830188Google Scholar
Derthick, Martha, and Quirk, Paul J.. 1985. The Politics of Deregulation. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Ellingsæter, Anne Lise. 2006. “The Norwegian Child Care Regime and Its Paradoxes.” In Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia, edited by Ellingsæter, Anne Lise and Leira, Arnlaug. Bristol: Policy Press. pp. 121–44Google Scholar
Engelstad, Fredrik. 2012. “Limits to State Intervention into the Private Sector Economy: Aspects of Property Rights in Social Democratic Societies.” In Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Engelstad, Fredrik and Teigen, Mari. Bingley: Emerald. pp. 235–65.Google Scholar
Engelstad, Fredrik. 2015. “Property Rights, Governance and Power Balances.” In Cooperation and Conflict the Nordic Way. Work, Welfare and Institutional Change in Scandinavia, edited by Engelstad, Fredrik and Hagelund, Anniken. Open, De Gruyter. Berlin, Boston: Sciendo Migration. pp. 3655. Retrieved 19 February 2018, from https://degruyter.com/view/product/462497.Google Scholar
Engelstad, Fredrik, Ekberg, Espen, Gulbrandsen, Trygve, and Vatnaland, Jon. 2003. Næringslivet mellom marked og politikk. Oslo: Gyldendal forlag.Google Scholar
Evenrud, Marte. 2010. Politisk diskurs forut for innføringen av lov om representasjon av begge kjønn I styrene til allmennaksjeselskap. Masteroppgave. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Fagan, Colette, Gonzalez Menendez, Maria C., and Ansón, Silvia Gomez. 2012. Women on Corporate Boards and in Top Management. European Trends and Policy. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, and Piscopo, Jennifer. 2013. “Equality, Democracy and the Broadening and Deepening of Gender Quotas.” Politics & Gender 9 (3): 310–16.Google Scholar
Hagen, Inger Marie. 2015. “Participation and Co-Determination. Why Some Arrangement Fail and Other Prevail.” In Cooperation and Conflict the Nordic Way. Work, Welfare and Institutional Change in Scandinavia, edited by Engelstad, Fredrik and Hagelund, Anniken. Open, De Gruyter. Berlin, Boston: Sciendo Migration. pp. 7795. Retrieved 19 February 2018, from https://degruyter.com/view/product/462497.Google Scholar
Halrynjo, Sigtona, Teigen, Mari, and Nadim, Marjan. 2015. “Kvinner og menn i toppledelsen.” In Virkninger av kjønnskvotering i norsk næringsliv, edited by Teigen, Mari. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk. pp. 6176.Google Scholar
Hernes, Helga. 1987. Welfare State and Woman Power. Essays in State Feminism. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Krizsan, Andrea, Skjeie, Hege, and Squires, Judith. 2012. “Institutionalizing Intersectionality: A Theoretical Framework.” In Institutionalizing Intersectionality: The Changing Nature of European Equality Regimes, edited by Krizsan, Andrea, Skjeie, Hege, and Squires, Judith. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 132.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona L. 2008. “Quota Laws for Women in Politics: Implications for Female Practice.” Social Politics 15 (3): 345–68.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona L. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and True, Jacqui. 2012. “Rethinking the life cycles of international norms: The United Nations and the global promotion of gender equality.” European Journal of International Relations: 18 (1): 103–27. doi: 10.1177/1354066110380963Google Scholar
Magma, . 2010. “Da kvoteringsloven kom til verden: En politisk styrtfødsel. Intervju med Ansgar Gabrielsen i tidsskriftet Magma” [Interview with Ansgar Gabrielsen in the scientific management journal, Magma]. Magma 7: 1519.Google Scholar
Murray, Rainbow, Krook, Mona Lena, and Opello, Katherine A. R.. 2012. “Why Are Gender Quotas Adopted? Party Pragmatism and Parity in France.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (3): 529–43.Google Scholar
Niskanen, Kirsti, ed. 2011. Gender and Power in the Nordic Countries – With Focus on Politics and Business. Oslo: NIKK-publication 2011, Vol. 1. Available at: www.nikk.no/wp-content/uploads/NIKKpub2011_broschyr_K%C3%B8n-og-magt_Gender-Power.pdf (Accessed August 2017).Google Scholar
NOU. 2000. Bør offentlig sektor eksponeres for konkurranse? – En gjennomgang av nasjonale og internasjonale erfaringer. Norwegian Official Report 19.Google Scholar
NOU. 2001. Velgere, valgordning, valgte. Norwegian Official Report 3.Google Scholar
NOU. 2012. Politikk for likestilling. Norwegian Official Report 15.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rubio-Marín, Ruth. 2014. “The Achievement of Female Suffrage in Europe: On Women's Citizenship.” I:CON 12 (1): 434.Google Scholar
Skjeie, Hege. 1991. “The Uneven Advance of Norwegian Women.” New Left Review 187: 79102.Google Scholar
Skjeie, Hege. 1992. Den politiske betydningen av kjønn. En studie av norsk top-politikk. ISF-rapport 92:11. Oslo: Institutt for samfunnsforskning.Google Scholar
Skjeie, Hege, and Siim, Birte. 2000. “Scandinavian Feminist Debates on Citizenship.” International Political Science Review 21 (4): 345–60.Google Scholar
Skjeie, Hege, and Teigen, Mari. 2003. Menn i mellom. Mannsdominans og likestillingspolitikk. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.Google Scholar
Stjernø, Steinar. 2005. Solidarity in Europe: The History of an Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph. 2010. Freefall: Free Markets and the Sinking of the Global Economy. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sørensen, Siri Øyslebø. 2011. “Statsfeminismens møte med næringslivet. Bakgrunnen og gjennombruddet for kjønnskvotering i bedriftsstyrer som politisk reform.” Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning 35 (2): 102–19.Google Scholar
Teigen, Mari. 2002. “Kvotering til styreverv – Mellom offentlig og privat handlefrihet.” Tidskrift for samfunnsforskning 43 (1): 73104.Google Scholar
Teigen, Mari. 2012a. “Gender Quotas for Corporate Boards in Norway – Innovative Gender Equality Policy.” In Women on Corporate Boards and in Top Management: European Trends and Policy, edited by Fagan, Colette, Gonzalez Menendez, Maria C., and Ansón, Silvia Gomez. London: Palgrave. pp. 7090.Google Scholar
Teigen, Mari. 2012b. “Gender Quotas in Corporate Boards – On the Diffusion of a Distinct National Policy Reform.” In Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Engelstad, Fredrik and Teigen, Mari. Bingley: Emerald. pp. 115–46.Google Scholar
Teigen, Mari. 2015. “The Making of Gender Quotas for Corporate Boards in Norway.” In Cooperation and Conflict the Nordic Way. Work, Welfare and Institutional Change in Scandinavia, edited by Engelstad, Fredrik and Hagelund, Anniken. De Gruyter Open. Berlin, Boston: Sciendo Migration. pp. 96117. Retrieved 19 February 2018, from https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/462497.Google Scholar
Teigen, Mari, and Wängnerud, Lena. 2009. “Tracing Gender Equality Cultures: Elite Perceptions of Gender Equality in Norway and Sweden.” Politics and Gender 5: 2144.Google Scholar
Terjesen, Siri, Aguilera, Ruth, and Lorenz, Ruth. 2015. “Legislating a Woman's Seat on the Board: Institutional Factors Driving Gender Quotas for Boards of Directors.” Journal of Business Ethics 128 (2): 233–51.Google Scholar
Vik, Malin Lenita. 2012. Kjønnslikhet, kvinneulikhet, og mangfold – «velment og forent» eller på tvers og tverke? En komparativ studie av norsk likestillingspolitikk 1981–2013. Masteroppgave, Institutt for statsvitenskap, Universitetet i Oslo.Google Scholar
Vogel, Steven K. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules. Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Walby, Sylvia. 2015. Crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Woldendorp, Jaap. 2011. “Corporatism in Small North-West European Countries 1970–2006: Business as Usual, Decline or a New Phenomenon.” Working Paper Series 30 (February), Department of Political Science, VU University Amsterdam.Google Scholar

References

Agnblad, Johan, Berglöf, Erik, Högfeldt, Peter, and Svancar, Helena. 2001. ‘Ownership and control in Sweden: Strong Owners, Weak Minorities, and Social Control.’ In The Control of Corporate Europe, edited by Barca, Fabrizio and Becht, Marco, 228–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, Christina. 1994. Mäns makt och kvinnors intressen. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, Christina et al. 1999. Equal Democracies. Gender and Politics in the Nordic Countries. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Bohman, Love, Bygren, Magnus, and Edling, Christofer. 2012. ‘Surge under Threat: The Rapid Increase of Women on Swedish Boards of Directors.’ In Women on Corporate Boards and in Top Management: European Trends and Policy, edited by Fagan, Colette, Menèndez, Maria González, and Ansón, Sylvia Gómez, 91108. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Borchorst, Anette, Freidenvall, Lenita, Kantola, Johanna, Reisel, Liza, and Teigen, Mari. 2012. ‘“Institutionalizing Intersectionality in the Nordic Countries: Anti-Discrimination and Equality in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.”’ In Institutionalizing Intersectionality: The Changing Nature of European Equality Regimes, edited by Krizsan, Andrea, Skjeie, Hege and Squires, Judith, 5988. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. ‘From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.’ Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 275–98.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 1998. Rødstrømperne. Den danske Rødstrømpebevaegelses udvikling, nytænkning og gennemslag 1970–85. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, and Freidenvall, Lenita. 2005. ‘Quotas as a “Fast Track” to Equal Political Representation for Women. Why Scandinavia is No Longer the Model.’ International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 2648.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, and Freidenvall, Lenita 2008. Kvotering. Stockholm: SNS.Google Scholar
Eduards, Maud. 2002. Förbjuden handling: om kvinnors organisering och feministisk teori. Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
Fredell, Åsa. 2005. Lagstadgad könskvotering i bolagsstyrelser? En analys av den svenska mediadebatten. Working Paper Series, No 2. The Research Program on Gender Quotas. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Freidenvall, Lenita. 2005. ‘A Discursive Struggle – The Swedish National Federation of Social Democratic Women and Gender Quotas.’ Nordic Journal of Women's Studies 13 (3): 175–86.Google Scholar
Freidenvall, Lenita. 2006. Vägen till Varannan damernas. Kvinnorepresentation, kandidaturval och kvotering i svensk politik 1970–2002. Stockholms universitet.Google Scholar
Freidenvall, Lenita. 2007. Regeringsformen ur ett könsperspektiv: en övergripande genomgång. SOU 2007:67. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
Freidenvall, Lenita. 2013. ‘Sweden: Step by step – Women's Inroads into Parliamentary Politics.’ In Breaking Male Dominance in Old Democracies, edited by Dahlerup, Drude and Leyenaar, Monique, 97123. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freidenvall, Lenita, Dahlerup, Drude, and Skeije, Hege. 2006. ‘The Nordic countries. An Incremental Model.’ In Women, Quotas and Politics, edited by Dahlerup, Drude, 5582. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freidenvall, Lenita, and Hallonsten, Hanna. 2013. ‘Why Not Corporate Gender Quotas in Sweden?Representation 49 (4): 467–85.Google Scholar
Heidenrich, Vibeke. 2012. ‘Why Gender Quotas on Company Boards in Norway – and Not in Sweden?’ In Firms, Boards, and Gender Quotas in Comparative Perspectives, edited by Engelstad, Fredrik and Teigen, Mari, 147–83. Comparative Social Research 29. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Levitsky, Steven. 2004. ‘Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda.’ Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 725–40.Google Scholar
Hernes, Helga. 1987. Welfare State and Woman Power. Essays in State Feminism. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Melanie, and Paxton, Pamela. 2008. ‘Continuous Change, Episodes, and Critical Periods: A Framework for Understanding Women's Political Representation over Time.’ Politics & Gender 4 (2): 233–64.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Gunnel. 1996. Från broderskap till systerskap. Det socialdemokratiska kvinnoförbundets kamp för inflytande och makt i SAP. Lund: Arkiv Förlag.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics. Gender and Candidate Selection Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and Mackay, Fiona, eds. 2011. Gender, Politics, and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Mackay, Fiona. 2011. ‘Conclusion: Towards institutionalism?’ In Gender, Politics, and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism, edited by Krook, Mona Lena and Mackay, Fiona, 181–93. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nilsson, Tomas. 2009. ‘Kön och makt I svenskt näringsliv.’ In Kön och Makt I Norden del 1 Landsrapporter, edited by Niskanen, Kirsti and Nyberg, Anita. Oslo: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
Sabuni, N. 2008. ‘Quotas are the Wrong Way to Go.’ Expressen. 27 October.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, Diane. 1996. Gender, Equality and Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, Diane. 2005. ‘Party Feminism, State Feminism and Women's Representation in Sweden.’ In State Feminism and Political Representation, edited by Lovenduski, Joni, 195215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen, eds. 2005. Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Törnqvist, Maria. 2006. ‘Könspolitik på gränsen. Debatterna om varannan damernas och Thamprofessurerna.’ Ph.D. Dissertation, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Wide, Jessika. 2006. ‘Kvinnors politiska representation i ett jämförande perspektiv - nationell och lokal nivå.’ Ph.D. Dissertation, Umeå Universitet.Google Scholar
Wängnerud, Lena. 1998. ‘Politikens andra sida. Om kvinnorepresentation i Sveriges riksdag.’ Ph.D. Dissertation, Göteborg studies in politics 53.Google Scholar

References

Bacchi, Carol. 2006. “Arguing for and Against Quotas. Theoretical Issues.” In Women, Quotas and Politics, edited by Dahlerup, Drude, 3251. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, Christina, Borchorst, Anette, Christensen, Ann-Dorte, Silén, Viveca Ramstedt, Raum, Nina C., and Styrkásdóttir, Audur, eds. 1999. Equal Democracies: Gender and Politics in the Nordic Countries. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Bloksgaard, Lotte. 2014. “Negotiating Leave in Workplace: Leave Practices and Masculinity Constructions among Danish Fathers.” In Fatherhood in the Nordic Welfare States. Comparing Care Policies and Practice, edited by Eydal, Guöný Björk and Rostgaard, Tine, 141–61. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Borchorst, Anette. 1999. “Gender equality law.” In Equal Democracies: Gender and Politics in the Nordic Countries, edited by Bergqvist, Christina, Borchorst, Anette, Christensen, Ann-Dorte, Silén, Viveca Ramstedt, Raum, Nina C., and Styrkásdóttir, Audur, 190207. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Borchorst, Anette, and Christensen, Ann-Dorte. 2003. “Kønskvotering i SF og i forskerstillinger – diskursiv praksis og forandring” [Gender Quotas in the Socialist People's Party and in research positions]. In Ligestillingspolitik som diskurs og praksis, edited by Borchorst, Anette and Dahlerup, Drude, 101–23. Frederiksberg: Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Borchorst, Anette, Christensen, Ann-Dorte, and Raum, Nina. 1999. “Equal Democracies. Conclusions and Perspectives.” In Equal Democracies: Gender and Politics in the Nordic Countries, edited by Bergqvist, Christina, Borchorst, Anette, Christensen, Ann-Dorte, Silén, Viveca Ramstedt, Raum, Nina C. and Styrkásdóttir, Audur, 277–91. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Borchorst, Anette, and Dahlerup, Drude. 2003. Ligestillingspolitik som diskurs og praksis [Gender Equality Policies as Discourse and Praxis]. Frederiksberg: Forlaget Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Borchorst, Anette, and Freidenvall, Lenita. 2012. “Parental Leave in Denmark and Sweden: Similar and Different.” In Comparisons, Quotas and Critical Change: In Honor of Drude Dahlerup, edited by Freidenvall, Lenita and Micheletti, Michele, 3850. Stockholm: Stockholm University Department of Political Science.Google Scholar
Borchorst, Anette, and Agustín, Lise Rolandsen. 2015. “Judicialization and Europeanization: The Danish Equal Pay Case.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Borchorst, Anette, and Siim, Birte. 2002. “The Women-Friendly Welfare State Revisited.” NORA. The Nordic Journal of Women's Studies 10 (2): 90–8.Google Scholar
Borchorst, Anette, and Siim, Birte 2008. “The Women-Friendly Policies and State Feminism: Theorizing Scandinavian Gender Equality.” Feminist Theory 9 (2): 207–24.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ann-Dorte. 1999. “Women in Political Parties.” In Equal Democracies. Gender and Politics in the Nordic Countries, edited by Bergqvist, Christina, Borchorst, Anette, Christensen, Ann-Dorte, Silén, Viveca Ramstedt, Raum, Nina C. and Styrkásdóttir, Audur, 6587. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ann-Dorte, and Knopp, Poul Damkjær. 1998. Kvinder og politisk repræsentation i Danmark [Women and Political Representation in Denmark]. GEP's Working Paper 7, Aalborg Universitet, Aalborg. Available at: http://vbn.aau.dk/files/48901621/GEP_Tekstserie_No7.pdf.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ann-Dorte, and Siim, Birte. 2001. Køn, demokrati og modernitet. Mod nye politiske identiteter [Gender, Democracy and Modernity. Towards New Political Identities]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
Christiansen, Peter, Møller, Birgit, and Togeby, Lise. 2002. “Køn og eliter” [Gender and Elites]. In Kønsmagt under forandring, edited by Borchorst, Anette, 7291. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2002. “Er ligestillingen opnået? Ligestillingsdebattens forskellighed I Danmark og Sverige.” [Has Gender Equality been Achieved? Variations in the Gender Equality Debate in Denmark and Sweden]. In Kønsmagt under Forandring, edited by Borchorst, Anette, 226–46. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2013. “Denmark: High Representation of Women without Gender Quota.” In Breaking Male Dominance in Democracies, edited by Dahlerup, Drude and Leyenaar, Monique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude ed. 2006. Women, Quotas and Politics, Abindon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fiig, Christina, and Siim, Birte. 2012. “Democratization of Denmark. The Political Inclusion of Women.” In The Struggle for Female Suffrage in Europe. Voting to Become Citizens, edited by Ruiz, Blanca Rodriquez and Rubio-Marín, Ruth, 6177. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2013. Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Freidenvall, Lenita, Dahlerup, Drude, and Skjeie, Hege. 2006. “The Nordic Countries an Incremental Model.” In Women, Quotas and Politics, edited by Dahlerup, Drude, 5582. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hernes, Helga Maria. 1987. Welfare State and Woman Power: Essays in State Feminism. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2007. “Candidate Gender Quotas: A Framework for Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 46: 367–94.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2016. “Contesting Gender Quotas: Dynamics of Resistance.” Politics, Groups and Identities 4 (2): 268–84.Google Scholar
Meret, Susi, and Siim, Birte. 2013. “Gender, Populism and Politics of Belonging. Discourses of Right-Wing Populist Parties in Denmark, Norway and Austria.” In Negotiating Gender and Diversity in an Emergent European Public Sphere, edited by Siim, Birte and Mokre, Monika, 7896. London: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Meret, Susi, and Siim, Birte 2017. “Men's Parties with Women Leaders: A Comparative Study of the Rightwing Populist Leaders Pia Kjaersgaard, Marine Le Pen and Siv Jensen.” In Understanding the Populist Shift, edited by Lazaridis, G., Benveniste, A., and Campani, G.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ministry for Gender Equality. 2014. Redegørelse/Perspektiv- og handlingsplan 2014. Copenhagen: Ministry for Gender Equality.Google Scholar
Siim, Birte. 2000. Gender and Citizenship. Politics and Agency in France, Britain and Denmark. Singapore: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siim, Birte, and Stoltz, Pauline. 2015. “Particularities of the Nordic: Challenges to Equality Politics in a Globalized World.” In Remapping Gender, Place and Mobility: Global Confluences and Local Particularities in Nordic Peripheries, edited by Faber, Stine Thidemann and Nielsen, Helene Pristed, 1934. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Statistics Denmark. 2015. Kvinder og mænd i 100 år – fra lige valgret mod ligestilling. Copenhagen: Statistics Denmark.Google Scholar
Teigen, Mari. 2000. “The Affirmative Action Controversy.” Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 8 (2): 6377.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×