Book contents
- Feedback in Second Language Writing
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Feedback in Second Language Writing
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributor Bios
- Acknowledgments
- Author's Preface
- Series Editors’ Preface
- 1 Contexts and Issues in Feedback on L2 Writing
- Section 1: Situating Feedback: Sociocultural Dimensions
- Section 2: Shaping Feedback: Delivery and Focus Dimensions
- Section 3: Negotiating Feedback: Interpersonal and Interactional Dimensions
- 9 Interpersonality and Teacher-Written Feedback
- 10 Fostering Formative Online Forums
- 11 Supervisory Feedback
- 12 Reviewers’ Feedback on Second-Language Writers’ Submissions to Academic Journals
- Section 4: Engaging with Feedback: Student Participation Dimensions
- Index
- References
10 - Fostering Formative Online Forums
Feedback, Dialogue and Disciplinarity
from Section 3: - Negotiating Feedback: Interpersonal and Interactional Dimensions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2019
Book contents
- Feedback in Second Language Writing
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Feedback in Second Language Writing
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributor Bios
- Acknowledgments
- Author's Preface
- Series Editors’ Preface
- 1 Contexts and Issues in Feedback on L2 Writing
- Section 1: Situating Feedback: Sociocultural Dimensions
- Section 2: Shaping Feedback: Delivery and Focus Dimensions
- Section 3: Negotiating Feedback: Interpersonal and Interactional Dimensions
- 9 Interpersonality and Teacher-Written Feedback
- 10 Fostering Formative Online Forums
- 11 Supervisory Feedback
- 12 Reviewers’ Feedback on Second-Language Writers’ Submissions to Academic Journals
- Section 4: Engaging with Feedback: Student Participation Dimensions
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Feedback in Second Language WritingContexts and Issues, pp. 184 - 205Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Attar, D., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Monaghan, F., Rhys, M., & Sinka, I. (2015). The Effectiveness of Interventions to Support Greater Participation in and More Purposeful Use of Online Forums on Undergraduate English Language Studies Modules. Open University: Scholarship Report Exchange Report.Google Scholar
Belcher, D. (2001). Cyberdiscourse, evolving notions of authorship, and the teaching of writing. In Hewings, M. (Ed.), Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Applications, Papers in Honour of Tony Dudley-Evans. Birmingham: The University of Birmingham Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Coffin, C. & Hewings, A. (2005). Engaging Electronically: Using CMC to develop students’ argumentation skills in Higher Education. Language in Education, 19(1), 32–49.Google Scholar
Coffin, C., Hewings, A., & North, S. (2012). Arguing as an academic purpose: The role of asynchronous conferencing in supporting argumentative dialogue in school and university. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 38–51.Google Scholar
Deeley, S. J. & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463–77.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hewings, A. (2004). Developing discipline-specific writing: An analysis of undergraduate geography essays. In Ravelli, L. and Ellis, R. (Eds.) Academic Writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lea, M. R. (2001). Computer conferencing and assessment: New ways of writing in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 163–81.Google Scholar
Light, V., Nesbitt, E., Light, P., & Burns, J. R. (2000) ‘Let’s you and me have a little discussion’: Computer mediated communication in support of campus-based university courses. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 85–96.Google Scholar
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marttunen, M. & Laurinen, L. (2001). Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments. Instructional Science, 29(2), 127–53.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (2017). Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(2), 127–41.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. D. & Pessoa, S. (2017). Scaffolding the writing development of the Argument genre in history: The case of two novice writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30, 26–37.Google Scholar
Painter, C., Coffin, C., & Hewings, A. (2003). Impacts of directed tutorial activities in computer conferencing: A case study. Distance Education, 4(2), 159–74.Google Scholar
Perrotta, C. & Whitlock, D. (2017). Assessment for learning. In: Duval, E., Sharples, M. and Sutherland, R., (Eds.), Technology Enhanced Learning: Research Themes. Cham: Springer, pp. 127–35.Google Scholar
Rowan-Kenyon, H. T., Martinez Aleman, A. M., Gin, K., Blakeley, B. Gismondi, A., Lewis, J. McCready, A., Zepp, D., and Knight, S. (2016). Social Media in Higher Education, ASHE High. Edu. Rept., 42, 7–128.Google Scholar
Ryan-Atkin, H. (2015). The use of an on-line discussion forum to support collaborative studying practices and argumentation amongst trainee teachers. Teacher Education Advancement Network Journal (TEAN), 7(1), 25–37.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used By Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sitter, K. C. & Curnew, A. H. (2016). The application of social media in social work community practice. Social Work Education, 35(3), 271–83.Google Scholar
Tagg, C., Seargeant, P., & Brown, A. (2017). Taking Offence on Social Media: Conviviality and Communication on Facebook. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thorpe, M. (2002). Rethinking learner support: The challenge of collaborative online learning. Open Learning, 17(2), 105–19.Google Scholar
Tolmie, A. & Boyle, J. (2000). Factors influencing the success of computer mediated communication (CMC) environments in university teaching: A review and case study. Computers and Education, 34(2), 119–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. (2002). Networking into academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 45–58.Google Scholar
Wenger-Trayner, E., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Hutchinson, S., Kubiak, C., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, Identity, and Knowledgeability In Practice-Based Learning. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Commentary – computer mediation, PBL, and dialogicality. Distance Education, 23(1), 105–8.Google Scholar