Book contents
- Apuleius’ Invisible Ass
- Apuleius’ Invisible Ass
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: Uncovering the Unseen in Apuleius
- Chapter 1 Apuleius’ Daemonic Voice
- Chapter 2 Invisible Man: Lucius, Gyges, and the Ethics of the Metamorphoses
- Chapter 3 Invisibility and the Structure of Reality in Cupid and Psyche
- Chapter 4 Scattered Limbs and Gleaming Bones: The Symbolism and Metaphysics of Fragmented Bodies in the Metamorphoses
- Chapter 5 Apprehending the Egyptian Gods: Focalization and Mysticism in Book 11
- Chapter 6 The Power of the Metamorphoses
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2019
Book contents
- Apuleius’ Invisible Ass
- Apuleius’ Invisible Ass
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: Uncovering the Unseen in Apuleius
- Chapter 1 Apuleius’ Daemonic Voice
- Chapter 2 Invisible Man: Lucius, Gyges, and the Ethics of the Metamorphoses
- Chapter 3 Invisibility and the Structure of Reality in Cupid and Psyche
- Chapter 4 Scattered Limbs and Gleaming Bones: The Symbolism and Metaphysics of Fragmented Bodies in the Metamorphoses
- Chapter 5 Apprehending the Egyptian Gods: Focalization and Mysticism in Book 11
- Chapter 6 The Power of the Metamorphoses
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Apuleius' Invisible AssEncounters with the Unseen in the <I>Metamorphoses</I>, pp. 265 - 288Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Ammannati, G. 2011. “Il Laurenziano 68,2 (F) e il finale delle Metamorfosi di Apuleio,” MD 67, 229–241.Google Scholar
Ando, C. 2010. “Praesentia Numinis: Part 1: The Invisibility of Gods in Roman Thought and Language,” Asdiwal 5, 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkin, J. 2013. “Puella Virgo: Rites of Passage in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” in Futre Pinheiro, M. P., Bierl, A., and Beck, R. (eds.), Intende, Lector: Echoes of Myth, Religion, and Ritual in the Ancient Novel, Berlin, 111–122.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. 2003. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, Trask, W. R. (trans.), Princeton.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, Emerson, C. and Holquist, M. (trans.), Austin.Google Scholar
Barra, G. 1960–1961. “Il valore e il significato del De deo Socratis di Apuleio,” Annali della Facoltà di lettere e filosofia di Napoli 9, 67–119.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1977a. “The Death of the Author,” in Heath, S. (trans.), Image, Music, Text, New York, 142–148.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1977b. “From Work to Text,” in Heath, S. (trans.), Image, Music, Text, New York, 155–164.Google Scholar
Barton, C. A. 2002. “Being in the Eyes: Shame and Sight in Ancient Rome,” in Fredrick, D. (ed.), The Roman Gaze: Vision, Power, and the Body, Baltimore, 216–235.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 1989. Decoding the Ancient Novel: The Reader and the Role of Description in Heliodorus and Achilles Tatius, Princeton.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 1997. Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan’s Civil War, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 2006. The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-Knowledge, and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire, Chicago.Google Scholar
Beck, R. 2000. “Apuleius the Novelist, Apuleius the Ostian Householder and the Mithraeum of the Seven Spheres: Further Explorations of an Hypothesis of Filippo Coarelli,” in Wilson, S. G. and Desjardins, M. (eds.), Text and Artifact in the Religions of Mediterranean Antiquity: Essays in Honour of Peter Richardson, Waterloo, 551–567.Google Scholar
Beck, R. 2003. “Mystery Religions, Aretalogy and the Ancient Novel,” in Schmeling, G. (ed.), The Novel in the Ancient World, 2nd ed., Leiden, 131–150.Google Scholar
Beck, R. 2004. “Lucius and the Sundial: A Hidden Chronotopic Template in Metamorphoses 11,” in Zimmerman, M. and Van Der Paardt, R. (eds.), Metamorphic Reflections: Essays Presented to Ben Hijmans at His 75th Birthday, Leuven, 309–318.Google Scholar
Beck, R. 2006. “Divino quodam stellarum consortio coniunctum: The Astrological Relationship of Lucius to the Priest of Isis as a ‘Chronotopic’ Template for Apuleius, Metamorphoses 11,” in Santini, C., Zurli, L., and Cardinali, L. (eds.), Concentus ex dissonis: Scritti in onore di Aldo Setaioli, 2 vols., Naples, I.85–96.Google Scholar
Beer, R. 2011. “Lucius bei den Phäaken: Zum νόστος–Motiv in Apuleius, Met. 11,” Ancient Narrative 9, 77–98.Google Scholar
Benson, G. 2016. “Seeing Demons: Autopsy in Maximus of Tyre’s Oration 9 and Its Absence in Apuleius’ On the God of Socrates,” Ramus 45.1, 102–131.Google Scholar
Benson, G. 2018. “Cupid and Psyche and the Illumination of the Unseen,” in Cueva, E., Schmeling, G., James, P., Ní Mheallaigh, K., Panayotakis, S., and Scippacercola, N. (eds.), Re-Wiring the Ancient Novel, vol. 2, Roman Novels and Other Important Texts, Ancient Narrative Supplement 24.2, Groningen, 85–115.Google Scholar
Bergman, J. 1972. “Decem illis diebus: Zum Sinn der Enthaltsamkeit bei den Mysterienweihen im Isisbuch des Apuleius,” in Bergman, J., Drynjeff, K., and Ringgren, H. (eds.), Ex orbe religionum: Studia Geo Widengren oblata, vol. 1, Leiden, 332–346.Google Scholar
Bernhard, M. 1927. Der Stil des Apuleius von Madaura. Ein Beitrag zur Stilistik des Spätlateins, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Bettenson, H. (trans.). 2003. Augustine: Concerning the City of God against the Pagans, New York.Google Scholar
Betz, H. D. 1995. “Secrecy in the Greek Magical Papyri,” in Kippenberg, H. and Stroumsa, G. (eds.), Secrecy and Concealment, Studies in the History of Religion 65, New York, 153–175.Google Scholar
Bierl, A. 2007. “Mysterien der Liebe und die Initiation Jugendlicher. Literatur und Religion im griechischen Roman,” in Bierl, A., Lämmle, R., and Wesselmann, K. (eds.), Literatur und Religion II. Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen, Berlin and New York, 239–334.Google Scholar
Bierl, A. 2013a. “Myth and the Novel: Introductory Remarks and Comments on the Roundtable Discussion,” in Futre Pinheiro, M. P., Bierl, A., and Beck, R. (eds.), Intende, Lector: Echoes of Myth, Religion, and Ritual in the Ancient Novel, Berlin and Boston, 7–16.Google Scholar
Bierl, A. 2013b. “From Mystery to Initiation: A Mytho-Ritual Poetics of Love and Sex in the Ancient Novel—Even in Apuleius’ Golden Ass?,” in Futre Pinheiro, M. P., Bierl, A., and Beck, R. (eds.), Intende, Lector: Echoes of Myth, Religion, and Ritual in the Ancient Novel, Berlin and Boston, 82–99.Google Scholar
Bitel, A. 2000–2001. “Quis ille Asinus aureus? The Metamorphoses of Apuleius’ Title,” Ancient Narrative 1, 208–244.Google Scholar
Bitel, A. 2006. “Apuleius, Asinus aureus 1,5,3 and the Interpretative Implications of Naming Narrators,” in Keulen, W. H., Nauta, R. R., and Panayotakis, S. (eds.), Lectiones Scrupulosae: Essays on the Text and Interpretation of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses in Honour of Maaike Zimmerman, Ancient Narrative Supplement 6, Groningen, 222–233.Google Scholar
Bloom, H. 1996. Omens of Millennium: The Gnosis of Angels, Dreams, and Resurrection, New York.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L. 1964. Labyrinths: Selected Stories and Other Writings, Yates, D. and Irby, J. E. (eds.), New York.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2002. “The Chronology of the Earlier Greek Novels since B. E. Perry: Revisions and Precisions,” Ancient Narrative 2, 47–63.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2008. “Literary Milieux,” in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and Roman Novel, Cambridge, 17–38.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. 1998. “Contending with Conversion: Reflections on the Reformation of Lucius the Ass,” Phoenix 52, 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brashear, W. 1995. “The Greek Magical Papyri: An Introduction and Survey. Annotated Bibliography (1928–1994),” ANRW 2.18.5, 3380–3684.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. E. 1986. “In the Light of the Moon: Demonology in the Early Imperial Period,”ANRW 2.16.3, 2068–2145.Google Scholar
Brown, J. K. 2007. The Persistence of Allegory: Drama and Neoclassicism from Shakespeare to Wagner, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1996. Creation of the Sacred: Tracks of Biology in Early Religions, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Butler, S., and Purves, A. (eds.). 2014. Synaesthesia and the Ancient Senses, New York.Google Scholar
Bynum, C. W. 2011. Christian Materiality: An Essay on Religion in Late Medieval Europe, New York.Google Scholar
Calonghi, F. 1915. “Il prologo delle Metamorfosi di Apuleio,” Rivista di Filologia e d’istruzione Classica 43.1–33, 209–236.Google Scholar
Carlisle, D. P. C. 2008. “Vigilans somniabar: Some Narrative Uses of Dreams in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” in Riess, W. (ed.), Paideia at Play: Learning and Wit in Apuleius, Ancient Narrative Supplement 11, Groningen, 215–233.Google Scholar
Carver, R. 2001. “Quis ille? The Role of the Prologue in Apuleius’ Nachleben,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 163–174.Google Scholar
Carver, R. 2007. The Protean Ass: The Metamorphoses of Apuleius from Antiquity to the Renaissance, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cavarero, A. 2005. For More than One Voice: Toward a Philosophy of Vocal Expression, Kottman, P. A. (trans.), Stanford.Google Scholar
Cavicchioli, S. 2002. The Tale of Cupid and Psyche: An Illustrated History, Scott, S. (trans.), New York.Google Scholar
Cazzaniga, I. 1949. “Il supplizio del miele e delle formiche: Un motivo novellistico nelle Metamorfosi di Apuleio (VIII,22),” Studies in Philology 46, 1–5.Google Scholar
Celoria, F. 1992. The Metamorphoses of Antoninus Liberalis: A Translation with Commentary, London.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. 1984. Story and Situation: Narrative Seduction and the Power of Fiction, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Ciraolo, L. J. 1995. “Supernatural Assistants in the Greek Magical Papyri,” in Meyer, M. and Mirecki, P. (eds.), Ancient Magic and Ritual Power, Religions in the Graeco-Roman World 129, New York, 279–295.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. 2001. “Prologue and Provenance: Quis ille? or Unde ille?,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 101–110.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. 1990. “Fatal Charades: Roman Executions Staged as Mythological Enactments,” JRS 80, 44–73.Google Scholar
Connors, C. 1998. Petronius the Poet: Verse and Literary Tradition in the Satyricon, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Connors, C. 2005. “Metaphor and Politics in John Barclay’s Argenis (1621),” in Harrison, S. J., Paschalis, M., and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.), Metaphor and the Ancient Novel, Ancient Narrative Supplement 4, Groningen, 245–274.Google Scholar
Connors, C. 2008. “Politics and Spectacles,” in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and Roman Novel, Cambridge, 162–181.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1996. The Hidden Author: An Interpretation of Petronius’ Satyricon, E. Fantham (trans.), Berkeley.Google Scholar
Copeland, R., and Struck, P. T. (eds.). 2010. The Cambridge Companion to Allegory, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cueva, E. P. 2004. The Myths of Fiction: Studies in the Canonical Greek Novels, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cueva, E. P., and Byrne, S. N. (eds.). 2014. A Companion to the Ancient Novel, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Dällenbach, L. 1989. The Mirror in the Text, Whiteley, J. with Hughes, E. (trans.), Chicago.Google Scholar
Damsté, P. H. 1928. “Spicilegium Criticum ad Apulei Metamorphoseon Libros,” Mnemosyne 56, 1–28.Google Scholar
De’Conno, R. 1958–1959. “Posizione e significato dei Florida nell’ opera di Apuleio,” Annali della Facoltà di lettere e filosofia di Napoli 8, 57–76.Google Scholar
DeFilippo, J. G. 1990. “Curiositas and the Platonism of Apuleius’ Golden Ass,” AJPh 111.4, 471–492. (Reprinted in Harrison 1999, 269–289).Google Scholar
De Jong, I. J. F. 2001. “The Prologue as a Pseudo-Dialogue and the Identity of Its (Main) Speaker,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 201–212.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. 1974. “Plato and the Intellectual Life of the Second Century A.D.,” in Bowersock, G. W. (ed.), Approaches to the Second Sophistic, University Park, PA, 4–10.Google Scholar
De Nie, G., Morrison, K. F., and Mostert, M. (eds.). 2005. Seeing the Invisible in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, Turnhout.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derchain, P., and Hubaux, J.. 1958. “L’Affaire du marche d’Hypata dans la Métamorphoses d’Apulée,” L’Antiquité Classique 27, 100–104.Google Scholar
Destrée, P., and Smith, N. D. (eds.). 2005. Socrates’ Divine Sign: Religion, Practice, and Value in Socratic Philosophy, Kelowna, BC.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 1977. The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220, London.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1965. Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety: Some Aspects of Religious Experience from Marcus Aurelius to Constantine, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Donalson, M. D. 2003. The Cult of Isis in the Roman Empire: Isis Invicta, Lewiston, NY.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 1993. “The Unity of Apuleius’ Eighth Book & the Danger of Beasts,” Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 5, 91–109.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 1994. “The Roman Audience of the Golden Ass,” in Tatum, J. (ed.), The Search for the Ancient Novel, Baltimore, 419–435.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 1998. “Cupid and Psyche: A Question of the Vision of Apuleius,” in Zimmerman, M. et al. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 2, Cupid and Psyche, Groningen, 1–22.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 2001. “Prologic, Predecessors, and Prohibitions,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Cambridge, 123–136.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 2005. “Greek Novel and the Ritual of Life: An Exercise in Taxonomy,” in Harrison, S., Paschalis, M., and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.), Metaphor and the Ancient Novel, Ancient Narrative Supplement 4, Groningen, 23–35.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 2007. “A Lengthy Sentence: Judging the Prolixity of the Novels,” in Paschalis, M., Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S., and Zimmerman, M. (eds.), The Greek and Roman Novel: Parallel Readings, Ancient Narrative Supplement 8, Groningen, 133–150.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 2012. “Geography and Direction in Metamorphoses 11,” in Keulen, W. and Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 3, The Isis Book, Leiden, 156–167.Google Scholar
Drews, F. 2006. “Der Sprecherwechsel zwischen Apuleius und Lucius im Prolog der Metamorphosen,” Mnemosyne 59.3, 403–420.Google Scholar
Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. 2000. Kulträume im römischen Alltag: Das Isisbuch des Apuleius und der Ort von Religion im kaiserzeitlichen Rom, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. 2012. “The Gleaming Pate of the Pastophorus: Masquerade or Embodied Lifestyle?,” in Keulen, W. and Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 3, The Isis Book, Leiden, 42–72.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2007b. “From Diana via Venus to Isis: Viewing the Deity with Apuleius,” in Elsner, J., Roman Eyes: Visuality and Subjectivity in Art and Text, Princeton, 289–302.Google Scholar
Englert, J., and Long, T.. 1972. “Functions of Hair in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” CJ 68, 236–239.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. A. 1999. “The Ovidian Corpus: Poetic Body and Poetic Text,” in Hardie, P., Barchiesi, A., and Hinds, S. (eds.), Ovidian Transformations: Essays on the Metamorphoses and Its Reception, Cambridge, 127–141.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 1998. Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fehling, D. 1977. Amor und Psyche: Die Schöpfung des Apuleius und ihre Einwirkung auf das Märchen, eine Kritik der romantischen Märchentheorie, Mainz.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 2002. “Metamorphosis in the Metamorphoses,” in Hardie, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ovid, Cambridge, 163–179.Google Scholar
Finkelpearl, E. D. 1990. “Psyche, Aeneas and an Ass: Apuleius Metamorphoses 6.10–6.21,” TAPA 120, 333–348.Google Scholar
Finkelpearl, E. D. 1998. Metamorphosis of Language in Apuleius: A Study of Allusion in the Novel, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Finkelpearl, E. D. 2004. “The Ends of the Metamorphoses (Apuleius Metamorphoses 11.26.4–11.30),” in Zimmerman, M. and Van Der Paardt, R. (eds.), Metamorphic Reflections: Essays Presented to Ben Hijmans at His 75th Birthday, Leuven, 319–342.Google Scholar
Finkelpearl, E. D. 2012. “Egyptian Religion in Met. 11 and Plutarch’s DIO: Culture, Philosophy, and the Ineffable,” in Keulen, W. and Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 3, The Isis Book, Leiden, 183–201.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. 2009. “No Success Like Failure: The Task of the Translator in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” in Paschalis, M., Panayotakis, S., and Schmeling, G. (eds.), Readers and Writers in the Ancient Novel, Ancient Narrative Supplement 12, Groningen, 184–196.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. 2001. “Writing with Style: The Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses between Fingierte Mündlichkeit and Textuality,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 225–230.Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S. A. 1991. “Vergil’s Tale of the Trojan Horse in Apuleius’ Robber-Tale of Thrasyleon,” PP 46, 95–111.Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S. A. 1992a. “Epic Inversion in Apuleius’ Tale of Tlepolemus/Haemus,” Mnemosyne 45, 60–74.Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S. A. 1992b. “Charite’s Literary Models: Vergil’s Dido and Homer’s Odysseus,” in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VI [Collection Latomus 217], Brussels, 445–450.Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S. A. 1992c. “Homeric Allusions to the Cyclopeia in Apuleius’ Description of the Robbers’ Cave,” PP 47, 50–58.Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S. A. 2001. Roles and Performances in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S. A. 2007. “Transforming the Genre: Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” in Paschalis, M., Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S., and Zimmerman, M. (eds.), The Greek and Roman Novels: Parallel Readings, Ancient Narrative Supplement 8, Groningen, 193–203.Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S. A. 2008. Witches, Isis, and Narrative: Approaches to Magic in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Berlin.Google Scholar
Frank, G. 2000. The Memory of the Eyes: Pilgrims to Living Saints in Christian Late Antiquity, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Fredrick, D. 2002b. “Invisible Rome,” in Fredrick, D. (ed.), The Roman Gaze: Vision, Power, and the Body, Baltimore, 1–30.Google Scholar
Fry, G. 1984. “Philosophie et mystique de la destinée. Etude du thème de la Fortune dans les Métamorphoses d’Apulée,” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica (New Series) 18.3, 137–170.Google Scholar
Futre Pinheiro, M. P., Bierl, A., and Beck, R. (eds.). 2013. Intende, Lector: Echoes of Myth, Religion, and Ritual in the Ancient Novel, Berlin.Google Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. 2008. The Fortunes of Apuleius and the Golden Ass: A Study in Transmission and Reception, Princeton.Google Scholar
Gasparro, G. S. “Mysteries and Oriental Cults: A Problem in the History of Religions,” in North, J. A. and Price, S. R. F. (eds.), The Religious History of the Roman Empire: Pagans, Jews, and Christians, Oxford, 276–324.Google Scholar
Gianotti, G. F. 1983. “Asini e schiavi: Zoologia filosofica e ideologie della dipendenze nelle ‘Metamorfosi’ apuleiane,” Quaderni di storia 9.18, 121–153.Google Scholar
Gianotti, G. F. 1986. “Romanzo” e ideologia: Studi sulle Metamorfosi di Apuleio, Naples.Google Scholar
Gill, C., and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.). 1993. Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, Austin.Google Scholar
Gilliom, J., and Monahan, T.. 2013. Super Vision: An Introduction to the Surveillance Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. W. 1995. Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome, Princeton.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. W. 1999. “Truth Contests and Talking Corpses,” in Porter, J. I. (ed.), Constructions of the Classical Body, Ann Arbor, 287–313.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. W. 2001. “Mutilated Messengers: Body Language in Josephus,” in Goldhill, S. (ed.), Being Greek under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire, Cambridge, 50–85.Google Scholar
Goldbacher, A. 1872. “Über Lucius von Patrae, den dem Lucius zugeschriebenen Λούκιος ἢ Ὄνος und des Apuleius Metamorphosen,” Zeitschrift für die österreichischen Gymnasien 23, 323–341, 403–421.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1995. Foucault’s Virginity: Ancient Erotic Fiction and the History of Sexuality, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2002. Who Needs Greek? Contests in the Cultural History of Hellenism, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2008. “Genre,” in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and Roman Novel, Cambridge, 185–200.Google Scholar
Graverini, L. 2003. “The Winged Ass: Intertextuality and Narration in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” in Panayotakis, S., Zimmerman, M., and Keulen, W. H. (eds.), The Ancient Novel and Beyond, Leiden, 207–218.Google Scholar
Graverini, L. 2006. “An Old Wife’s Tale,” in Keulen, W. H., Nauta, R. R., and Panayotakis, S. (eds.), Lectiones Scrupulosae: Essays on the Text and Interpretation of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses in Honour of Maaike Zimmerman, Ancient Narrative Supplement 6, Groningen, 86–110.Google Scholar
Graverini, L. 2007. “The Ass’s Ears and the Novel’s Voice: Orality and the Involvement of the Reader in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” in Rimell, V. (ed.), Seeing Tongues, Hearing Scripts: Orality and Representation in the Ancient Novel, Ancient Narrative Supplement 7, Groningen, 138–167.Google Scholar
Graverini, L. 2012a. Literature and Identity in The Golden Ass of Apuleius, Lee, B. T. (trans.), Columbus.Google Scholar
Graverini, L. 2012b. “Prudentia and Providentia: Book XI in Context,” in Keulen, W. H. and Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 3, The Isis Book, Leiden, 86–106.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. G. 1975. Apuleius of Madauros: The Isis-Book (Metamorphoses, Book XI), Leiden.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. 1963. Apulée: Métamorphoses, IV 28–VI 24 (Le conte d’Amour et Psyche), Paris.Google Scholar
Habermehl, P. 1996. “Quaedam divinae mediae potestates: Demonology in Apuleius’ De Deo Socratis,” Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 7, 117–142.Google Scholar
Hammer, S. 1926. “L’État actuel des recherches sur l’oeuvre d’Apulée,” Eos 29, 233–245.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1990a. “The Speaking Book: The Prologue to Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” CQ NS 40, 507–513.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1990b. “Some Odyssean Scenes in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” MD 25, 193–201.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1997. “From Epic to Novel: Apuleius as Reader of Vergil,” MD 39, 53–74.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1998a. “Some Epic Structures in Cupid and Psyche,” in Zimmerman, M. et al. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 2, Cupid and Psyche, Groningen, 51–68.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J.2000–2001. “Apuleius, Aelius Aristides, and Religious Autobiography,” Ancient Narrative 1, 245–259.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2003. “Epic Extremities: The Openings and Closures of Books in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” in Panayotakis, S., Zimmerman, M., and Keulen, W. (eds.), The Ancient Novel and Beyond, Leiden, 239–254.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2012a. “Narrative Subversion and Religious Satire in Metamorphoses 11,” in Keulen, W. H. and Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 3, The Isis Book, Leiden, 73–85.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2012b. “Interpreting the Anteludia (Apuleius, Metamorphoses 11.8),” Trends in Classics 4, 377–387.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2013a. Framing the Ass: Literary Texture in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2013b. “Constructing Apuleius: The Emergence of a Literary Artist,” in Harrison, S. J., Framing the Ass: Literary Texture in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 13–27.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2013c. “The Milesian Tales and the Roman Novel,” in Harrison, S. J., Framing the Ass: Literary Texture in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 57–68.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2013d. “Parallel Cults? Religion and Narrative in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses and Some Greek Novels,” in Harrison, S. J., Framing the Ass: Literary Texture in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 95–108.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2013e. “Apuleius and Homer: Some Traces of the Iliad in the Metamorphoses,” in Harrison, S. J., Framing the Ass: Literary Texture in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 257–270.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2014. “Ovid in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” in Miller, J. F. and Newlands, C. E. (eds.), A Handbook to the Reception of Ovid, Oxford, 86–99.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2015. Characterisation in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses: Nine Studies, Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J., Hilton, J. L., and Hunink, V. J. C. (eds.). 2001. Apuleius Rhetorical Works, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J., and Winterbottom, M.. 2001. “The Prologue to Apuleius’ Metamorphoses: Text, Translation, and Textual Commentary,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 9–15.Google Scholar
Heath, J. R. 1982. “Narration and Nutrition in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” Ramus 11.1, 57–77.Google Scholar
Heine, R. 1978. “Picaresque Novel versus Allegory,” in Hijmans, B. L. Jr. and van der Paardt, R. Th. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, Groningen, 25–42.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2001. “In Ya (Pre)face,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 188–197.Google Scholar
Herchenroeder, L. 2008. “Τί γὰρ τοῦτο πρὸς τὸν λόγον; Plutarch’s Gryllus and the So-Called Grylloi,” AJPh 129.3, 347–379.Google Scholar
Hicter, J. 1944–1945. “L’Autobiographie dans l’Âne d’or d’Apulée.” AC 13, 95–11; AC 14, 61–68.Google Scholar
Hijmans, B. L. 1978. “Significant Names and Their Function in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” in Hijmans, B. L. Jr. and van der Paardt, R. Th. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, Groningen, 107–122.Google Scholar
Hijmans, B. L. 2006. “Apollo’s Sn(e)aky Tongue(s),” in Keulen, W. H., Nauta, R. R., and Panayotakis, S. (eds.), Lectiones Scrupulosae: Essays on the Text and Interpretation of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses in Honour of Maaike Zimmerman, Ancient Narrative Supplement 6, Groningen, 15–27.Google Scholar
Hijmans, B. L., and Van der Paardt, R. Th. (eds.). 1978. Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, Groningen.Google Scholar
Hindermann, J. 2009. Der elegische Esel. Apuleius’ Metamorphosen und Ovids Ars amatoria, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Hindermann, J. 2009. “The Elegiac Ass: The Concept of Servitium Amoris in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” Ramus 38.1, 75–84.Google Scholar
Holt, P. 1992. “H.G. Wells and the Ring of Gyges,” Science Fiction Studies 19.2, 236–247.Google Scholar
Holzmeister, A. 2014. “Ekphrasis in the Ancient Novel,” in Cueva, E. P. and Byrne, S. N. (eds.), A Companion to the Ancient Novel, Malden, MA, 411–423.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. 1955. “Apuleius’s ‘Cupid and Psyche’ as a Platonic Myth,” The Bucknell Review 5.3, 24–38.Google Scholar
Hunink, V. J. C. 2000. “Apuleius, Pudentilla, and Christianity,” Vigiliae Chirstianae 54.1, 80–94.Google Scholar
Hunink, V. J. C. 2004. “Plutarch and Apuleius,” in de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T., and Schenkeveld, D. M. (eds.), The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the International Plutarch Society, vol. 1, Plutarch’s Statesman and His Aftermath: Political, Philosophical and Literary Aspects, Leiden, 251–260.Google Scholar
Hunink, V. J. C. 2006. “Dreams in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” in Lardinois, A. P. M. H. et al. (eds.), Land of Dreams: Greek and Roman Studies in Honour of A. H. M. Kessels, Leiden, 18–31.Google Scholar
Innes, D. 2001. “Why Isthmos Ephyrea?,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 111–119.Google Scholar
James, P. 1998. “The Unbearable Lightness of Being: Levis Amor in the Metamorphoses of Apuleius,” in Zimmerman, M. et al. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 2, Cupid and Psyche>, Groningen, 35–49.Google Scholar
Jensson, G. 2004. The Recollections of Encolpius: The Satyrica of Petronius as Milesian Fiction, Ancient Narrative Supplement 2, Groningen.Google Scholar
Johnston, S. I. 2008. “Animating Statues: A Case Study in Ritual,” Arethusa 41.3, 445–477.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 2005. Philostratus: The Life of Apollonius of Tyana (Loeb), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 2017. Apuleius: Apologia, Florida, De Deo Socratis (Loeb), Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Joshel, S. R., and Petersen, L. H.. 2014. The Material Life of Roman Slaves, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Junghanns, P. 1932. “Die Erzählungstechnik von Apuleius’ Metamorphosen und ihrer Vorlage,” Philologus Suppl. 24.1.Google Scholar
Kahane, A. 2001. “Antiquity’s Future: Writing, Speech, and Representation in the Prologue to Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 231–244.Google Scholar
Kahane, A., and Laird, A. (eds.). 2001. A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kákosy, J. 1968. “Pythagoras hatás Apuleius Metamorphoses XI-ben?,” Antik Tanylmányok (Studia Antiqua) 15, 243–245.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. G. 1992. “Review of The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, Volume LVIII,” BASP 29, 211–217.Google Scholar
Kenaan, V. L. 2000. “‘Fabula anilis’: The Literal as a Feminine Sense,” in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, vol. 10, Brussels, 370–391.Google Scholar
Kenaan, V. L. 2010. “The Ancient Road to the Unconscious: On Dream Narratives and Repressed Desires in Ancient Fiction,” in Scioli, E. and Walde, C. (eds.), Sub Imagine Somni: Nighttime Phenomena in Greco-Roman Culture, Pisa, 165–183.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. 1990b. “Psyche and Her Mysterious Husband,” in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature, Oxford, 175–198.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. 2003. “In the Mill with Slaves: Lucius Looks Back in Gratitude,” TAPA 133.1, 159–192.Google Scholar
Kerényi, K. 1927. Die griechisch-orientalische Romanliteratur in religionsgeschichtlicher Beleuchtung, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Keulen, W. 2007. “Vocis immutatio: The Apuleian Prologue and the Pleasures and Pitfalls of Vocal Versatility,” in Rimell, V. (ed.), Seeing Tongues, Hearing Scripts: Orality and Representation in the Ancient Novel, Ancient Narrative Supplement 7, Groningen, 106–137.Google Scholar
Keulen, W. 2010. “Different Drinking Habits: Satirical Strategies of Self-Fashioning in Antonine Ego-Narrative,” Ancient Narrative 8, 85–113.Google Scholar
Keulen, W. 2015. “Lubrico virentis aetatulae: Lucius as Initiate (Metamorphoses Book 11),” in Harrison, S. (ed.), Characterisation in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Newcastle upon Tyne, 29–55.Google Scholar
Keulen, W., and Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. (eds.). 2012. Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 3, The Isis Book, Leiden.Google Scholar
Keulen, W. H., Nauta, R. R., and Panayotakis, S. (eds.). 2006. Lectiones Scrupulosae: Essays on the Text and Interpretation of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses in Honour of Maaike Zimmerman, Ancient Narrative Supplement 6, Groningen.Google Scholar
Kirichenko, A. 2010. A Comedy of Storytelling: Theatricality and Narrative in Apuleius’ Golden Ass, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Kirichenko, A. 2013. “Mimesis, Metamorphosis, and False Closure in Apuleius’ Golden Ass,” in Grewing, F. F., Acosta-Hughes, G., and Kirichenko, A. (eds.), The Door Ajar: False Closure in Greek and Roman Literature and Art, Heidelberg, 277–308.Google Scholar
König, J. 2008. “Body and Text,” in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and Roman Novel, Cambridge, 127–144.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 1994. Sexual Symmetry: Love in the Ancient Novel and Related Genres, Princeton.Google Scholar
Konstan, D., and Ramelli, I.. 2014. “The Novel and Christian Narrative,” in Cueva, E. P. and Byrne, S. N. (eds.), A Companion to the Ancient Novel, Malden, MA, 180–197.Google Scholar
Laird, A. 1993. “Fiction, Bewitchment and Story Worlds: The Implications of Claims to Truth in Apuleius,” in Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, Austin, 147–174.Google Scholar
Laird, A. 1997. “Description and Divinity in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 8, 59–85.Google Scholar
Laird, A. 2001a. “Paradox and Transcendence: The Prologue as the End,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 267–281.Google Scholar
Laird, A. 2001b. “Ringing the Changes on Gyges: Philosophy and the Formation of Fiction in Plato’s Republic,” JHS 121, 12–29.Google Scholar
Lalanne, S. 2006. Une éducation grecque. Rites de passage et construction des genres dans le roman grec ancien, Paris.Google Scholar
Lamberton, R. 1986. Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. 2001. “Humiliation and Immobility in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” TAPA 131, 217–255.Google Scholar
Lee, B. T., Finkelpearl, E., and Graverini, L. (eds.). 2014. Apuleius and Africa, London.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. 1997. Studien zur Struktur der “Milesischen” Novelle bei Petron und Apuleius, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lehnert, G. 1915. “Bericht über die Literatur zu Apuleius und zur Historia Apollonii Regis Tyrii aus den Jahren 1897–1914,” Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft 43, 147–176.Google Scholar
Lehnert, G. 1919. “Bericht über die Literatur zu Apuleius und zur Historia Apollonii Regis Tyrii aus den Jahren 1897–1914,” Jahresbericht über die Fortschritte der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft 44, 1–90.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 2013. From Polypragmon to Curiosus: Ancient Concepts of Curious and Meddlesome Behaviour, Oxford.Google Scholar
Levin, T., Frohne, U., and Weibel, P.. 2002. Ctrl [Space]: Rhetorics of Surveillance from Benthem to Big Brother, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Libby, B. B. 2011. “Moons, Smoke, and Mirrors in Apuleius’ Portrayal of Isis,” AJPh 132.2, 301–322.Google Scholar
Lincoln, B. 2007. Religion, Empire, and Torture: The Case of Achaemenian Persia, with a Postscript on Abu Ghraib, Chicago.Google Scholar
Luhrman, T. M. 2012. When God Talks Back: Understanding the American Evangelical Relationship with God, New York.Google Scholar
Luhrman, T. M., Padmavati, R., Tharoor, H., and Osei, A.. 2015. “Differences in Voice-Hearing Experiences of People with Psychosis in the USA, India and Ghana: Interview-Based Study,” The British Journal of Psychiatry 206.1, 41–44.Google Scholar
Mason, H. J. 1978. “Fabula Graecanica: Apuleius and His Greek Sources,” in Hijmans, B. L. Jr. and van der Paardt, R. Th. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, Groningen, 1–15.Google Scholar
Mason, H. J. 1994. “Greek and Latin Versions of the Ass-Story,” ANRW 2.34.2, 1665–1707.Google Scholar
Mattiacci, S. 1998. “Neoteric and Elegiac Echoes in the Tale of Cupid and Psyche by Apuleius,” in Zimmerman, M. et al. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 2, Cupid and Psyche, Groningen, 127–149.Google Scholar
Mattiacci, S. 2014. “Apuleius and Africitas,” in Lee, B. T., Finkelpearl, E., and Graverini, L. (eds.), Apuleius and Africa, London, 87–111.Google Scholar
May, R. 2010. “An Ass from Oxyrhynchus: P.Oxy. LXX.4762, Loukios of Patrae and the Milesian Tales,” Ancient Narrative 8, 59–83.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. 1968. “Eros und Psyche,” in Binder, G. and Merkelbach, R. (eds.), Amor und Psyche, Darmstadt, 392–407.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. 1988. Die Hirten des Dionysos. Die Dionysos-Mysterien der römischen Kaiserzeit und der bukolische Roman des Longus, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Mirecki, P. 2001. “Spells of Invisibility in the Coptic Kephalaia,” in BeDuhn, J. and Mirecki, P. (eds.), The Light and the Darkness: Studies in Manichaeism and Its World, Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 50, Leiden, 173–180.Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. 2007. “You Can’t Go Home Again: Lucius’ Journey in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses Set against the Background of the Odyssey,” MD 58, 93–113.Google Scholar
Morales, H. 2004. Vision and Narrative in Achilles Tatius’ Leucippe and Clitophon, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morales, H. 2008. “The History of Sexuality,” in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and Roman Novel, Cambridge, 39–55.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. 1965. “La demonologia medioplatonica e le Metamorfosi di Apuleio,” Maia 17, 30–46.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. 2015. Apuleius and the Metamorphoses of Platonism, Nutrix 10, Turnhout.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. 1993. “Make-Believe and Make Believe: The Fictionality of the Greek Novels,” in Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, Austin, 175–229.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. 2001. “The Prologues of the Greek Novels and Apuleius,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 152–162.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. 2004. “Chariton, Xenophon of Ephesus, Achilles Tatius, Heliodorus,” in De Jong, I. J. F., Nünlist, R., and Bowie, A. (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, vol. 1, Leiden, 479–543.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. 2008. “Foreword,” in Reardon, B. P. (ed.), Collected Ancient Greek Novels, Berkeley, ix–xix.Google Scholar
Morrison, K., and de Nie, G.. 2005. “Introduction,” in De Nie, G., Morrison, K. F., and Mostert, M. (eds.), Seeing the Invisible in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, Turnhout, 1–12.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 1992. “Disiecti membra poetae: The Rhetoric of Dismemberment in Neronian Poetry,” in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.), Innovations of Antiquity, New York, 391–419.Google Scholar
Murgatroyd, P. 1997a. “Apuleian Ecphrasis: Cupid’s Palace at Met: 5.1.2–5.2.2,” Hermes 125.3, 357–366.Google Scholar
Nakatani, S. 2003. “A Re-examination of Some Structural Problems in Achilles Tatius’ Leucippe and Clitophon,” Ancient Narrative 3, 63–81.Google Scholar
Naumann, N. 1987. “Amor und Psyche und der Gott von Miwa: Zu zwei verwandten Erzähltypen,” Fabula 28, 1–33.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. (ed.). 2010. Plutarch, on the Daimonion of Socrates: Human Liberation, Divine Guidance, and Philosophy, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Neumann, E. 1956. Amor and Psyche: The Psychic Development of the Feminine, R. Manheim (trans.), Princeton.Google Scholar
Newbold, R. F. 1991. “Icarus, Great Mother and Great Goddess in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” Latomus 50, 400–408.Google Scholar
Nicolai, R. 1999. “Quis ille? Il proemio delle Metamorfosi di Apuleio e il problema del lettore ideale,” MD 42, 143–164.Google Scholar
Nicolini, L. 2011. Ad (L)usum Lectoris: Etimologia e giochi di parole in Apuleio, Bologna.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. 2004. Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in Its Cultural Context, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 2001. “Cola and Clausulae in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses 1.1,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 16–26.Google Scholar
Nock, A. D. 1933. Conversion: The Old and New in Religion from Alexander the Great to Augustine of Hippo, Oxford (reprinted, Baltimore 1998).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1995. Poetic Justice: The Literary Imagination and Public Life, Boston.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. 2006. “4762: Narrative romance,” in Gonis, N., Thomas, J. D., and Hatzilambrou, R. (eds.), The Oxyrhynchus Papyri LXX, London, 22–29.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. C. 1998. “‘For Every Tatter in Its Mortal Dress’: Love, the Soul and Her Sisters,” in Zimmerman, M. et al. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 3, Cupid and Psyche, Groningen, 23–34.Google Scholar
Ogden, D. 2002. Magic, Witchcraft, and Ghosts in the Greek and Roman Worlds: A Sourcebook, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ogden, D. 2007. In Search of the Sorcerer’s Apprentice: The Traditional Tales of Lucian’s Lover of Lies, Swansea.Google Scholar
Ogden, D. 2008. Night’s Black Agents: Witches, Wizards, and the Dead in the Ancient World, New York.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, C. 1995. Theatrum Mundi: Theatrical Elements in the Satyrica of Petronius, Leiden.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, C. 2001. “Vision and Light in Apuleius’ Tale of Cupid and Her Mysterious Husband,” CQ NS 51.2, 576–583.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, C., and Panayotakis, S.. 2015. “The Human Characters in the Tale of Cupid and Psyche (Metamorphoses 4.28–6.24),” in Harrison, S. (ed.), Characterisation in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Newcastle upon Tyne, 125–145.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, S. 1997. “Insidiae Veneris: Lameness, Old Age and Deception in the Underworld (Apul. Met. 6,18–19),” Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 8, 23–39.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, S. 1998. “Slander and War Imagery in Apuleius’ Tale of Cupid and Psyche (Apul. Met. 5,5–5,21),” in Zimmerman, M. et al. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 2, Cupid and Psyche, Groningen, 151–164.Google Scholar
Paschalis, M. 2002. “Reading Space: A Re-examination of Apuleian ekphrasis,” in Paschalis, M. and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.), Space in the Ancient Novel, Ancient Narrative Supplement 1, Groningen, 132–142.Google Scholar
Paschalis, M., and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.). 2002. Space in the Ancient Novel, Ancient Narrative Supplement 1, Groningen.Google Scholar
Paschalis, M., Panayotakis, S., and Schmeling, G. (eds.). 2009. Readers and Writers in the Ancient Novel, Ancient Narrative Supplement 12, Groningen.Google Scholar
Payne, M. 2010. The Animal Part: Human and Other Animals in the Poetic Imagination, Chicago.Google Scholar
Pecere, O. 1987. “Qualche riflessione sulla tradizione di Apuleio a Montecassino,” in Cavallo, G. (ed.), Le Strade del testo, Bari, 97–124.Google Scholar
Penwill, J. L. 1975. “Slavish Pleasures and Profitless Curiosity; Fall and Redemption in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” Ramus 4, 49–82.Google Scholar
Penwill, J. L. 1990. “Ambages Reciprocae: Reviewing Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” in Boyle, A. J. (ed.), The Imperial Muse, vol. 2, Flavian Epicists to Claudian, Berwick, 211–235.Google Scholar
Penwill, J. L. 1998. “Reflections on a ‘Happy Ending’: The Case of Cupid and Psyche,” Ramus 27, 160–182.Google Scholar
Penwill, J. L. 2009. “On Choosing a Life: Variations on an Epic Theme in Apuleius Met. 10 & 11,” Ramus 38, 85–108.Google Scholar
Perkins, J. 1995. The Suffering Self: Pain and Narrative Representation in the Early Christian Era, London.Google Scholar
Perry, B. E. 1923. “The Significance of the Title in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” CP 18, 229–238.Google Scholar
Perry, B. E. 1967. The Ancient Romances: A Literary-Historical Account of Their Origins (Sather Classical Lectures 37), Berkeley.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. L. 2009. In Pursuit of Invisibility: Ritual Texts from Late Roman Egypt, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. L. 2011–2012. “On the Outside Looking In: Pliny’s ‘Natural History’ and the Portrayal of Invisibility Rituals in the Latin West,” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 56/57, 37–62.Google Scholar
Pinkster, H. 1998. “The Use of Narrative Tenses in Apuleius’ Amor and Psyche,” in Zimmerman, M. et al. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 2, Cupid and Psyche, Groningen, 103–111.Google Scholar
Pizzone, A. M. V. 2013. “The Tale of a Dream: Oneiros and Mythos in the Greek Novel,” in Futre Pinheiro, M. P., Bierl, A., and Beck, R. (eds.), Intende, Lector: Echoes of Myth, Religion, and Ritual in the Ancient Novel, Berlin, 67–81.Google Scholar
Plantade, E., and Plantade, N.. 2014. “Libyaca Psyche: Apuleius’ Narrative and Berber Folktales,” in Lee, B. T., Finkelpearl, E., and Graverini, L. (eds.), Apuleius and Africa, New York, 174–202.Google Scholar
Platt, V. 2011. Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. 1974. The Ancient View of Greek Art: Criticism, History and Terminology, New Haven.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. 2001. “Some Linguistic Points in the Prologue,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 27–36.Google Scholar
Preisendanz, K., and Henrichs, A. (eds.). 1974. Papyri Graecae Magicae, 2nd ed., Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. 2008. “The Re-Emergence of Ancient Novels in Western Europe,” in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and Roman Novel, Cambridge, 282–298.Google Scholar
Regen, F. 1971. Apuleius Philosophus Platonicus. Untersuchungen zur Apologie (De Magia) und zu De Mundo, Berlin.Google Scholar
Reid, J. D. (ed.). 1993. The Oxford Guide to Classical Mythology in the Arts 1300-1990s, Oxford.Google Scholar
Renehan, R. 1989. “Bruno Snell and Friedrich Nietzsche on the Speech of Asses,” CP 84, 49–50.Google Scholar
Riess, W. 2001. Apuleius und die Räuber: Ein Beitrag zur historischen Kriminalitätsforschung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Riess, W. 2008. Paideia at Play: Learning and Wit in Apuleius, Ancient Narrative Supplement 11, Groningen.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. 2007. Seeing Tongues, Hearing Scripts: Orality and Representation in the Ancient Novel, Ancient Narrative Supplement 7, Groningen.Google Scholar
Roller, M. 2001. Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome, Princeton.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. 2013. “Greek Fiction and Egyptian Fiction: Are They Related, and, If So, How?,” in Whitmarsh, T. and Thomson, S. (eds.), The Romance between Greece and the East, Cambridge, 23–37.Google Scholar
Sabnis, S. 2012. “Invisible Slaves, Visible Lamps: A Metaphor in Apuleius,” Arethusa 45.1, 79–108.Google Scholar
Salzman-Mitchell, P. 2005. A Web of Fantasies: Gaze, Image, and Gender in Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Columbus.Google Scholar
Sandy, G. 1978. “Book XI: Ballast or Anchor?,” in Hijmans, B. L. Jr. and van der Paardt, R. Th. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, Groningen, 123–140.Google Scholar
Sandy, G. 1994. “Apuleius’ Metamorphoses and the Greek Novel,” ANRW 2.34.3, 1511–1574.Google Scholar
Sandy, G. 1997. The Greek World of Apuleius: Apuleius and the Second Sophistic (Mnemosyne Supplement 174), Leiden.Google Scholar
Schlam, C. C. 1992. The Metamorphoses of Apuleius: On Making an Ass of Oneself, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Schlam, C. C. 1993. “Cupid and Psyche: Folktale and Literary Narrative,” Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 5, 63–73.Google Scholar
Schlam, C., and Finkelpearl, E.. 1998. “A Review of Scholarship on Apuleius’ Metamorphoses 1970–1998,” Lustrum 42, 7–230.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. 1997. “Reaktionen auf das Christentum in den ‘Metamorphosen’ des Apuleius,” Vigiliae Christianae 51.1, 51–71.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. 1997. Bildung und Macht: zur sozialen und politischen Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit, Munich.Google Scholar
Scioli, E., and Walde, C. (eds.). 2010. Sub Imagine Somni: Nighttime Phenomena in Greco-Roman Culture, Pisa.Google Scholar
Scobie, Alexander. 1975. Apuleius Metamorphoses (Asinus Aureus) I, Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Scobie, Alexander. 1983. Apuleius and Folklore: Toward a History of ML3045, AaTh567, 449A, London.Google Scholar
Selden, D. L. 2014. “Apuleius and Afroasiatic Poetics,” in Lee, B. T., Finkelpearl, E., and Graverini, L. (eds.), Apuleius and Africa, London, 205–270.Google Scholar
Sharf, R. H. 1998. “Experience,” in Taylor, M. C. (ed.), Critical Terms for Religious Studies, Chicago, 94–116.Google Scholar
Shumate, N. C. 1996b. “‘Darkness Visible’: Apuleius Reads Virgil,” Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 8, 103–116.Google Scholar
Sick, D. 2005. “Apuleius, Christianity, and Virgin Birth,” Wiener Studien 118, 91–116.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, A. 2014. “‘Gods into Bulls, Men into Wolves, Women into Spiders’: Classical Metamorphosis in The Satanic Verses,” Classical Receptions Journal 6.3, 426–445.Google Scholar
Slater, N. W. 1997. “Vision, Perception, and Phantasia in the Roman Novel,” in Picone, M. and Zimmermann, B. (eds.), Der antike Roman und seine mittelalterliche Rezeption, Berlin, 89–105.Google Scholar
Slater, N. W. 2001. “The Horizons of Reading,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 213–221.Google Scholar
Slater, N. W. 2014. “Various Asses,” in Cueva, E. P. and Byrne, S. N. (eds.), A Companion to the Ancient Novel, Malden, MA, 384–399.Google Scholar
Smith, W. S. 1972. “The Narrative Voice in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” TAPA 103, 513–534.Google Scholar
Smith, W. S. 1998. “Cupid and Psyche Tale: Mirror of the Novel,” in Zimmerman, M. et al. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 2, Cupid and Psyche, Groningen, 69–82.Google Scholar
Smith, W. S. 2015. “The Isis Book and Contemporary Jewish/Christian Literature,” GCA 2015, 529–542.Google Scholar
Spaeth, B. S. “‘The Terror That Comes in the Night’: The Night Hag and Supernatural Assault in Latin Literature,” in Scioli, E. and Walde, C. (eds.), Sub Imagine Somni: Nighttime Phenomena in Greco-Roman Culture, Pisa, 231–258.Google Scholar
Stark, I. 1989. “Religiöse Elemente im antiken Roman,” in Kuch, H. (ed.), Der Antike Roman. Untersuchungen zur literarischen Kommunikation und Gattungsgeschichte, Berlin, 135–149.Google Scholar
Starobinski, J. 1980. “The Style of Autobiography,” in Olney, J. (ed.), Autobiography: Essays Theoretical and Critical, Princeton, 73–83.Google Scholar
Stephens, S., and Winkler, J. (eds.). 1995. Ancient Greek Novels: The Fragments, Princeton.Google Scholar
Stover, J. A. 2016. A New Work by Apuleius: The Lost Third Book of the De Platone, Oxford.Google Scholar
Stramaglia, A. 2010. “Le Metamorfosi di Apuleio tra iconografia e papiri,” in Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A. (eds.), I papiri del romanzo antico. Atti del convengo internazionale di studi, Firenze, 11–12 giugno 2009, Florence, 165–192.Google Scholar
Struck, P. 2004. Birth of the Symbol: Ancient Readers at the Limits of Their Texts, Princeton.Google Scholar
Struck, P. 2010. “Allegory and Ascent in Neoplatonism,” in Copeland, R. and Struck, P. T. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Allegory, Cambridge, 57–70.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 2001. “The Hiding Author: Context and Implication,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 55–63.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 2004. “Bilingualism and Biculturalism in Antonine Rome: Apuleius, Fronto, and Gellius,” in Holford-Strevens, L. and Vardi, A. (eds.), The Worlds of Aulus Gellius, Oxford, 3–40.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. 1822. The Metamorphoses, or, Golden Ass, and Philosophical Works, of Apuleius, London.Google Scholar
Terdiman, R. 1980. “Materialist Imagination: Notes toward a Theory of Literary Strategies,” Helios 7.2, 27–49.Google Scholar
Thibau, R. 1965. “Les Métamorphoses d’Apulée et la théorie platonicienne de l’Erôs,” Studia philosophica Gandensia 3, 89–144.Google Scholar
Tilg, S. 2010. Chariton of Aphrodisias and the Invention of the Greek Love Novel, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tilg, S. 2012. “Aspects of a Literary Rationale of Metamorphoses 11,” in Keulen, W. and Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 3, The Isis Book, Leiden, 132–155.Google Scholar
Tilg, S. 2015. “Lucius as Ass (Metamorphoses Books 3–11),” in Harrison, S. (ed.), Characterisation in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Newcastle upon Tyne, 15–28.Google Scholar
Timotin, A. 2012. La démonologie platonicienne: Histoire de la notion de Daimōn de Platon aux derniers néoplatoniciens, Leiden.Google Scholar
Todorov, T. 1973. The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre, Howard, R. (trans.), Cleveland.Google Scholar
Tommasi Moreschini, C. O. 2013. “Gnostic Variations on the Tale of Cupid and Psyche,” in Futre Pinheiro, M. P., Bierl, A., and Beck, R. (eds.), Intende, lector: Echoes of Myth, Religion, and Ritual in the Ancient Novel, Berlin, 123–144.Google Scholar
Too, Y. L. 1996. “Statues, Mirrors, Gods: Controlling Images in Apuleius,” in Elsner, J. (ed.), Art and Text in Roman Culture, Cambridge, 133–152.Google Scholar
Too, Y. L. 2001. “Losing the Author’s Voice: Cultural and Personal Identities in the Metamorphoses Prologue,” in Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Oxford, 177–187.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. 1990. “Plato’s Phaedrus in Second-Century Greek Literature,” in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature, Oxford, 141–174.Google Scholar
Van der Paardt, R. Th. 1981. “The Unmasked ‘I’: Apuleius Met. XI. 27,” Mnemosyne 34, 96–106.Google Scholar
Van der Paardt, R. Th. 1991. L. Apuleius Madaurensis, The Metamorphoses. A Commentary on Book III with Text & Introduction, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Van der Stockt, L. “Plutarch and Apuleius: Laborious Routes to Isis,” in Keulen, W. and Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 3, The Isis Book, Leiden, 168–182.Google Scholar
Van der Vliet, J. 1897. “Die Vorrede der Apuleischen Metamorphosen,” Hermes 32, 79–85.Google Scholar
Van Groningen, B. A. 1965. “General Literary Tendencies in the Second Century A.D.,” Mnemosyne 18, 41–56.Google Scholar
Van Mal-Maeder, D. 1997. “Lector, intende: laetaberis: The Enigma of the Last Book of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 8, 87–118.Google Scholar
Van Mal-Maeder, D. 2015. “And There Were Words: The Characterisation of the Gods in the Metamorphoses,” in Harrison, S. (ed.), Characterisation in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, Newcastle upon Tyne, 147–165.Google Scholar
Van Mal-Maeder, D., and Zimmerman, M.. 1998. “The Many Voices in Cupid and Psyche,” in Zimmerman, M. et al. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 2, Cupid and Psyche, Groningen, 83–102.Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, B. A. 2009. Bilder der Sklaverei in den Metamorphosen des Apuleius (Vertumnus 7), Göttingen.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1991. “In the Mirror of Medusa,” in Zeitlin, F. I. (ed.), Mortals and Immortals: Collected Essays by Jean-Pierre Vernant, Princeton, 141–150.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. S. 1990. Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion, I: Ter Unus: Isis, Dionysos, Hermes. Three Studies in Henotheism, Leiden.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G. 1978. “Petronius and Apuleius,” in Hijmans, B. L. Jr. and van der Paardt, R. Th. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, Groningen, 17–24.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G. 1981. “Apuleius and Plutarch,” in Blumenthal, H. J. and Markus, R. A. (eds.), Neoplatonism and Early Christian Thought: Essays in Honour of A. H. Armstrong, London, 20–32.Google Scholar
Watson, N. 2014. “Dreams and Superstition: A Reinterpretation of Satire in Apuleius, Metamorphoses 11,” Ancient Narrative 11, 133–158.Google Scholar
Webb, R. 2009. Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice, London.Google Scholar
Weinreich, O. 1929. Gebet und Wunder, in Focke, F. et al. (eds.), Genethliakon Wilhelm Schmid zum siebzigsten Geburtstag am 24. Februar 1929 (Tübinger Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft 5), Stuttgart, 169–464.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. 1998. The Invisible Man: A Grotesque Romance. A Critical Text of the 1897 New York First Edition, with an Introduction and Appendices, Stover, L. (ed.), Jefferson, NC.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2008b. “Introduction,” in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and Roman Novel, Cambridge, 1–14.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T., and Bartsch, S.. 2008. “Narrative,” in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and Roman Novel, Cambridge, 245–257.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T., and Morales, H.. 2001. Achilles Tatius: Leucippe and Clitophon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. 1987. “Platonic Philosophy in the Early Centuries of the Empire,” ANRW 2.36.1, 81–123.Google Scholar
Wildberg, C. 2012. “Dionysos in the Mirror of Philosophy: Heraclitus, Plato, and Plotinus,” in Schlesier, R. (ed.), A Different God? Dionysos and Ancient Polytheism, Berlin, 205–232.Google Scholar
Williams, H. 2004. “The Ships on the Kenchreai Glass Panels,” in Zimmerman, M. and Van Der Paardt, R. (eds.), Metamorphic Reflections: Essays Presented to Ben Hijmans at His 75th Birthday, Leuven, 297–308.Google Scholar
Winkle, J. T. 2014. “‘Necessary Roughness’: Plato’s Phaedrus and Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” Ancient Narrative 11, 93–131.Google Scholar
Winkle, J. T. 2015. “Epona Salvatrix? Isis and the Horse Goddess in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” Ancient Narrative 12, 71–90.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. 1985. Auctor & Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius’s The Golden Ass, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. 1991. “The Constraints of Eros,” in Faraone, C. and Obbink, D. (eds.), Magika Hiera: Ancient Greek Magic and Religion, Oxford, 214–243.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. 1992. “Lollianos and the Desperadoes,” in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds.), Innovations of Antiquity, New York, 5–50.Google Scholar
Witte, A. E. 1997. “Calendar and Calendar Motifs in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses Book 11,” Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 8, 41–58.Google Scholar
Wlosok, A. 1969. “Zur Einheit der Metamorphosen des Apuleius,” Philologus 113, 68–84. (Reprinted in Harrison 1999, 142–156).Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. 2008. “Religion,” in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and Roman Novel, Cambridge, 91–108.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. 2006. “Awe and Opposition: The Ambivalent Presence of Lucretius in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” in Byrne, S. N., Cueva, E. P., and Alvares, J. (eds.), Authors, Authority, and Interpreters in the Ancient Novel, Ancient Narrative Supplement 5, Groningen, 317–339.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. 2009. “‘Food for Thought’ for Readers of Apuleius’ The Golden Ass,” in Paschalis, M., Panayotakis, S., and Schmeling, G. (eds.), Readers and Writers in the Ancient Novel, Ancient Narrative Supplement 12, Groningen, 184–196.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. 2012a. “Text and Interpretation, Interpretation and Text,” in Keulen, W. and Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. (eds.), Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 3, The Isis Book, Leiden, 1–27.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. 2013. “Mythical Repertoire and Its Functions in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses,” in Futre Pinheiro, M. P., Bierl, A., and Beck, R. (eds.), Intende, lector: Echoes of Myth, Religion, and Ritual in the Ancient Novel, Berlin, 43–47.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. et al. (eds.). 1998. Aspects of Apuleius’ Golden Ass, vol. 2, Cupid and Psyche, Groningen.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M., and Van Der Paardt, R. (eds.). 2004. Metamorphic Reflections: Essays Presented to Ben Hijmans at His 75th Birthday, Leuven.Google Scholar