Ahmadian, M. (2011). The effect of ‘massed’ task repetitions on complexity, accuracy and fluency: Does it transfer to a new task? The Language Learning Journal, 39, 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahmadian, M., Abdolrezapour, P. and Ketabi, S. (2012). Task difficulty and self-repair behaviour in second language oral production. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(3), 310–330.Google Scholar

Ahmadian, M, J. and Tavakoli, M. (2011). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 35–59.Google Scholar

Alonso-Ramos, M. (Ed.) (2016). Spanish Learner Corpus Research: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Alsagoff, L., McKay, S., Hu, G. and Renandya, W. (Eds.) (2012). Principles and Practices for Teaching English as an International Language. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. (1993). Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Arnold, J., Fagnano, M. and Tanenhaus, M. (2003). Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), 25–36.Google Scholar

Awwad, A. (2017). The effects of task complexity manipulated by intentional reasoning demands on second language learners’ speech performance: Interaction with language proficiency and working memory. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar

Awwad, A. and Tavakoli, P. (2019). Task complexity, language proficiency and working memory: Interaction effects on second language speech performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (published online ahead of print). doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-0378.Google Scholar

Awwad, A., Tavakoli, P. and Wright, C. (2017). ‘I think that’s what he’s doing’: Effects of intentional reasoning on second language (L2) speech performance. System, 67, 158–169.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. (2007). Working Memory, Thought and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1994). Reverse-order reports and the acquisition of tense: Beyond the principle of chronological order. Language Learning, 44, 243–282.Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2013). Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63(1), 68–86.Google Scholar

Barr, D. and Seyfeddinipur, M. (2010). The role of fillers in listener attributions for speaker disfluency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(4), 441–455.Google Scholar

Baten, L., Beaven, A., Osborne, J. and van Maele, J. (2013). WebCEF: An online collaboration tool for assessing foreign language proficiency. In Pumilia-Gnarini, P., Favaron, E., Pacetti, E., Bishop, J. and Guerra, L. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Didactic Strategies and Technologies for Education: Incorporating Advancements (pp. 559–570). IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2122-0.ch048CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bavelas, J., Gerwing, J., Sutton, C. and Prevost, D. (2008). Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 495–520.Google Scholar

Berger, J. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 586–607.Google Scholar

Blake, C. (2009). Potential of text-based internet chats for improving oral fluency in a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 227–240.Google Scholar

Board, T. and Tinsley, K. (2017). Languages for the Future. London: British Council. Available at: www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/languages_for_the_future_2017.pdf [Accessed 4 September 2019].Google Scholar

Bock, K. and Levelt, W. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In Gernsbacher, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Boers, F. (2014). A reappraisal of the 4/3/2 activity. RELC Journal, 45(3), 221–235.Google Scholar

Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H. and Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a Lexical Approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 245–261.Google Scholar

Boersma, P. and Weenink, D. (2013). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Version 5.3.51. Available at: www.praat.org/ [Accessed 3 September 2019].Google Scholar

Bonomo, A. (2017). World English(es) and the Multilingual Turn: Frameworks of Complex Phenomena. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30, 358–388.Google Scholar

Bortfeld, H., Leon, S., Bloom, J., Schober, M. and Brenan, S. (2001). Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role and gender. Language and Speech, 44(2), 123–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bosker, H., Pinget, A.-F., Quené, H., Sanders, T. and de Jong, N. H. (2012). What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, 30(2), 159–175.Google Scholar

de Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt's ‘speaking’ model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24.Google Scholar

de Bot, K. and Jaensch, C. (2015). What is special about L3 processing? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 130–144.Google Scholar

Bown, J., Dewey, D. and Belnap, K. (2015). Student interactions during study abroad in Jordan. In Mitchell, R., Tracy-Ventura, N. and McManus, K. (Eds.), Social Interaction, Identity and Language Learning During Residence Abroad (pp. 199–221). Amsterdam: EuroSLA Monograph Series.Google Scholar

Brecht, R. D., Davidson, D. E. and Ginsberg, R. B. (1995). Predictors of foreign language gain during study abroad. In Freed, B. F. (Ed.), Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context (pp. 37–66). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Brezina, V. and Flowerdew, L. (Eds.) (2017). Learner Corpus Research: New Perspectives and Applications. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

British Council (2019). Teaching Speaking: Unit 9. Available at: www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/teaching-speaking-unit-9-fluency [Accessed 29 October 2019].Google Scholar

Brooks, L. and Swain, M. (2014) Contextualizing performances: comparing performances during TOEFL iBTTM and real-life academic speaking activities. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 353–373.Google Scholar

Brown, A. (2006a). An examination of the rating process in the revised IELTS speaking test. In McGovern, P. and Walsh, S. (Eds.), IELTS Research Report (pp. 41–70). Canberra: IELTS Australia and British Council.Google Scholar

Brown, A. (2006b). Candidate discourse in the revised IELTS Speaking Test. In McGovern, P. and Walsh, S. (Eds.), IELTS Research Report (pp. 71–89). Canberra and Manchester: IELTS Australia and British Council.Google Scholar

Brown, A., Iwashita, N. and McNamara, T. (2005). An Examination of Rater Orientations and Test-Taker Performance on English for Academic Purposes Speaking Tasks, TOEFL Monograph Series MS-29. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar

Brown, G., Anderson, A., Shillcock, R. and Yule, G. (1984). Teaching Talk: Strategies for Production and Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brumfit, C. (1984). Communicative Methodology in Language Teaching: The Roles of Fluency and Accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bui, G. (2014). Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning, and proficiency levels. In Skehan, P. (Ed.), Processing Perspectives on Task Performance (pp. 63–93). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Burns, A. and Richards, J. (2009). The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of language. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P. and Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching Pedagogic Tasks, Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar

Cameron, D. (2001). Working with Spoken Discourse. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Canagarajah, A. (1999). Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Canale, M. and Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Centre for English Corpus Linguistics (CECL) (2019). Learner Corpora around the World. Louvain-la-Neuve: Université Catholique de Louvain. Available at: https://uclouvain.be/en/research-institutes/ilc/cecl/learner-corpora-around-the-world.html [Accessed 26 October 2019].Google Scholar

Chambers, F. (1997). What do we mean by fluency? System, 25, 535–544.Google Scholar

Chang, Y. F. (1999). Discourse topics and interlanguage variation. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Representation and Process: Proceedings of the 3rd Pacific Second Language Research Forum, 1 (pp. 235–241). Tokyo: PacSLRF.Google Scholar

Chen, T. (2019). Joint contributions of multilevel linguistic knowledge to character meaning retention in L2 Chinese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(1), 129–143.Google Scholar

Chen, K. and Huang, C. (2000). Sinica Corpus: Academia Sinica Balanced Corpus for Mandarin Chinese. Available at: www.sinica.edu.tw/SinicaCorpus [Accessed 27 October 2019].Google Scholar

Churchill, E. and DuFon, M. (Eds.) (2006). Language Learners in Study Abroad Contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Cirillo, L., Colón de Carvajal, I. and Ticca, A. (2016). ‘I’m sorry + naming the offense’: A format for apologizing. Discourse Processes, 53, 83–96.Google Scholar

Clark, H. and Fox Tree, J. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73–111.Google Scholar

Cohen, A. and Macaro, E. (Eds.) (2007). Language Learner Strategies: Thirty Years of Research and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. and Chafer, T. (2011). The experience and long-term impact of study abroad by Europeans in an African context. In Dervin, F. (Ed.), Analysing the Consequences of Academic Mobility and Migration (pp. 67–96). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

van Compernolle, R. and McGregor, J. (Eds). (2016). Authenticity, Language and Interaction in Second Language Contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Cook, V. (Ed.) (2002). Portraits of the L2 User. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Cordier, C. (2013). The presence, nature and role of formulaic sequences in English advanced learners of French: A longitudinal study. Unpublished PhD thesis, Newcastle University.Google Scholar

Costa, A. (2005). Lexical access in bilingual production. In Kroll, J. and de Groot, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism (pp. 308–325). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Council of Europe (2001). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/1680459f97 [Accessed 22 June 2020].Google Scholar

Council of Europe (2009a). A Common European Framework for Language Learning and Teaching: Draft 1 of a Framework Proposal. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. www.coe.int/lang.Google Scholar

Council of Europe (2009b). Relating Language Examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR). A Manual. Language Policy Division, Strasbourg: Council of Europe. www.coe.int/lang.Google Scholar

Council of Europe (2011). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/16802fc1bf [Accessed 26 October 2019].Google Scholar

Council of Europe (2018). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching and Assessment Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Strasbourg: Language Policy Division, Council of Europe. Available at: www.coe.int/lang-cefr [Accessed 26 October 2019].Google Scholar

Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H. and Boves, L. (2000). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technology. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(2), 989–999.Google Scholar

Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H. and Boves, L. (2002). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(6), 2862–2873.Google Scholar

Culpeper, J., Mackey, A. and Taguchi, N. (2018). Second Language Pragmatics: From Theory to Research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Daneman, M. (1991). Working memory as a predictor of verbal fluency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20(6), 445–464.Google Scholar

Daneman, M. and Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1–18.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (2010). Study abroad: When, how long, and with what results? New data from the Russian front. Foreign Language Annals, 43(1), 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dechert, H. (1980). Pauses and intonation as indicators of verbal planning in second language speech productions. In Dechert, H. and Raupach, M. (Eds.), Temporal Variables in Speech (pp. 271–285). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. (2001). Automaticity and automatisation. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 125–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. (Ed.) (2007). Practice in A Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Derwing, T., Munro, M. and Thomson, R. (2008). A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 359–380.Google Scholar

Derwing, T., Munro, M., Thomson, R. and Rossiter, M. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 533–557.Google Scholar

Derwing, T., Rossiter, M., Munro, M. and Thomson, R. (2004). Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54, 655–679.Google Scholar

Dewaele, J.-M. (1996). How to measure formality of speech? A Model of Synchronic Variation. In Sajavaara, K. and Fairweather, C. (Eds.), Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, Jyväskylä Cross-Language Studies, No. 17 (pp. 119–133). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar

Dewaele, J.-M. and Furnham, A. (2000). Personality and speech production: A pilot study of second language learners. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 355–365.Google Scholar

Diao, W., Donovan, A. and Malone, M. (2018). Oral language development among Mandarin learners in Chinese homestays. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education, 3(1), 33–58.Google Scholar

Diepenbroek, L. and Derwing, T. (2014). To what extent do popular ESL textbooks incorporate oral fluency and pragmatic development. TESL Canada Journal, 30, 1–20.Google Scholar

Dijum, K., Schoonen, R. and Hulstijn, J. (2018). Professional and non-professional raters’ responsiveness to fluency and accuracy in L2 speech: An experimental approach. Language Testing, 35(4), 501–527.Google Scholar

Di Silvio, F., Diao, W. and Donovan, A. (2016). The development of L2 fluency during study abroad: A cross-language study. Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 610–624.Google Scholar

Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In Lantolf, J. (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 27–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dore, C. (2015). Perceptions of Fluency. London: British Council. Available at: https://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/attachments/dissertation_design_for_publication_2016_reading_university_cecilia_dore.pdf [Accessed 30 October 2019).Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. and Kormos, J. (1998). Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 349–385.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. and Ushioda, E. (2013). Teaching and Researching Motivation. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Du, H. (2013). The development of Chinese fluency during study abroad in China. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 131–143.Google Scholar

Duff, P., Anderson, T., Ilnyckyj, R., Van Gaya, E., Wang, R. and Yates, E. (2013). Learning Chinese: Linguistic, Sociocultural, and Narrative Perspectives. Berlin/Boston: DeGruyter.Google Scholar

Duran-Karaoz, Z. and Tavakoli, P. (2020). Predicting L2 fluency from L1 fluency behaviour: The case of L1 Turkish and L2 English speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–25.Google Scholar

Edwards, J. (2008). The transcription of discourse. In Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. and Hamilton, H. (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 321–348). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ejzenberg, R. (2000). The juggling act of oral fluency: A psycho-sociolinguistic metaphor. In Riggenbach, H. (Ed.), Perspectives on Fluency (pp. 287–313). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In Ellis, R. (Ed.), Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, R. and Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring Language Pedagogy Through Second Language Acquisition Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Everson, M. and Xiao, Y. (Eds.) (2009). Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language. Boston: Cheng & Tsui.Google Scholar

Faerch, C., Haastrup, K. and Phillipson, R. (1984). Learner Language and Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Faulkner, D., Littleton, K. and Woodhead, M. (2013). Learning Relationships in the Classroom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Felker, E., Klockmann, H. and de Jong, N. H. (2019). How conceptualizing influences fluency in first and second language speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40, 111–136.Google Scholar

Fillmore, C. J. (1979). On fluency. In Fillmore, C. J., Kempler, D. and Wang, W. (Eds.), Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior (pp. 85–101). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Finlayson, I. and Corley, M. (2008). Disfluency in dialogue: An intentional sign from the speaker. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19(5), 921–928.Google Scholar

Fortkamp, M. (1999). Working memory capacity and aspects of L2 speech production. Communication and Cognition, 32(3–4), 259–295.Google Scholar

Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1–23.Google Scholar

Foster, P. (2009). Task-based language learning research: Expecting too much or too little? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 247–263.Google Scholar

Foster, P. (2013). Fluency. In Chapelle, C. (Ed.), The Encyclopaedia of Applied Linguistics. London: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0417.Google Scholar

Foster, P. (2020). Oral fluency in a second language: A research agenda for the next ten years. Language Teaching, Early view, June 2020.Google Scholar

Foster, P. and Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–323.Google Scholar

Foster, P. and Tavakoli, P. (2009). Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency and lexical diversity. Language Learning, 59, 866–896.Google Scholar

Foster, P., Tonkyn, A. and Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21, 354–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freed, B. (Ed.) (1995). Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Freed, B. (2000). Is fluency, like beauty, in the eyes (and ears) of the beholder? In Riggenbach, H. (Ed.), Perspectives on Fluency (pp. 243–265). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Freed, B., Segalowitz, N. and Dewey, D. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 275–301.Google Scholar

Frost, K., Clothier, J., Huisman, A. and Wigglesworth, G. (2019). Responding to a TOEFL iBT integrated speaking task: Mapping task demands and test takers’ use of stimulus content. Language Testing. doi: 10.1177/0265532219860750.Google Scholar

Fulcher, G. (1987). Tests of oral performance: the need for databased criteria. English Language Teaching Journal, 41(4), 287–291.Google Scholar

Fulcher, G. (1993). The construction and validation of rating scales for oral tests in English as a foreign language. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar

Fulcher, G. (2010). Practical Language Testing. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar

Fusaroli, R. and Tylen, K. (2016). Investigating conversational dynamics: Interactive alignment, interpersonal synergy and collective task performance. Cognitive Science, 40(1), 145–171.Google Scholar

García, O. and Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

García, O. and Sylvan, C. (2011). Pedagogies and practices in multilingual classrooms: Singularities in pluralities. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 385–400.Google Scholar

Gass, S. and Varonis, E. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(3), 283–302.Google Scholar

Gatbonton, E. and Segalowitz, N. (1988). Creative automatization: Principles for promoting fluency within a communicative framework. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 473–492.Google Scholar

Gatbonton, E. and Segalowitz, N. (2005). Rethinking communicative language teaching: A focus on access to fluency. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 325–353.Google Scholar

GCSE Subject Content for Modern Foreign Languages (2014). Department of Education, UK. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/gcse-modern-foreign-languages [Accessed 29 October 2019].Google Scholar

Gilabert, R. (2007). Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 214–240.Google Scholar

Gilabert, R., Barón, J. and Levkina, M. (2011). Manipulating task complexity across task types and modes. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 105–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40, 97–118.Google Scholar

Ginther, A., Dimova, S. and Yang, R. (2010). Conceptual and empirical relationships between temporal measures of fluency and oral English proficiency with implications for automated scoring. Language Testing, 27(3), 379–399.Google Scholar

Goldman-Eisler, F. (1951). The measurement of time sequences in conversational behaviour. British Journal of Psychology, 42, 355–362.Google Scholar

Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. London/New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Götz, S. (2013). Fluency in Native and Nonnative English Speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Granger, S., Dagneaux, E. and Meunier, F. (2002). The International Corpus of Learner English. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar

Granger, S., Gilquin, G. and Meunier, F. (Eds.) (2015). The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Green, D. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81.Google Scholar

Gregg, K. (1996). The logical and developmental problems of second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. and Bhatia, T. (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 50–84). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (1982). Life with Two Languages: An Introduction to Bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (2008). Studying Bilinguals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Guillot, M. (1999). Fluency and Its Teaching. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Hall, J., Hellerman, J. and Pekarek Doehler, S. (2011). L2 Interactional Competence and Development. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Han, Z.-H. (Ed.) (2014). Studies in Second Language Acquisition of Chinese. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Harmer, J. (2005). The Practice of English language Teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Harwell, D. (2018). The Accent Gap. Available at: www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/business/alexa-does-not-understand-your-accent/ [Accessed 20 October 2019].Google Scholar

Hoey, M. (1983). On the Surface of Discourse. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Hong Kong English Language Education Key Learning Area Curriculum Guide (2017). Available at: www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/renewal/ELE/ELE_KLACG_eng_draft_2017_05.pdf [Accessed 29 October 2019].Google Scholar

Horwitz, E., Horwitz, M. and Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132.Google Scholar

House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 225–252.Google Scholar

Housen, A. and Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473.Google Scholar

Housen, A., Kuiken, F. and Vedder, I. (2012). Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hsu, H. C. (2019). The combined effect of task repetition and post-task transcribing on L2 speaking complexity, accuracy, and fluency. The Language Learning Journal, 47(2), 172–187.Google Scholar

Huensch, A. and Tracy-Ventura, N. (2017). L2 utterance fluency development before, during, and after residence abroad: A multidimensional investigation. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 275–293.Google Scholar

Huensch, A., Tracy-Ventura, N., Bridges, J. and Cuesta Medina, J. (2019). Variables affecting the maintenance of L2 proficiency and fluency four years post-study abroad. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education, 4(1), 96–125.Google Scholar

Huifen, L. (2015). Computer-mediated communication (CMC) in L2 oral proficiency development: A meta-analysis. ReCALL, 27(3), 261–287.Google Scholar

Hunt, K. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. NCTE Research report No. 3. Champaign, IL: NCTE.Google Scholar

Hunter, A.-M. (2017). Fluency development in the ESL classroom: The impact of immediate task repetition and procedural repetition on learners’ oral fluency. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Surrey, Guildford.Google Scholar

IELTS (2018). IELTS Speaking Band Descriptors. Available at: www.ielts.org/-/media/pdfs/speaking-band-descriptors.ashx?la=en [Accessed 28 March 2018].Google Scholar

In’nami, Y. and Koizumi, R. (2016). Task and rater effects in L2 speaking and writing: A synthesis of generalizability studies. Language Testing, 33(3), 341–366.Google Scholar

Isaacs, T. and Trofimovich, P. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility: identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 475–505.Google Scholar

Isabelli-García, C. (2010). Acquisition of Spanish gender agreement in two learning contexts: Study abroad and at home. Foreign Language Annals, 43(2), 289–303.Google Scholar

Ishikawa, T. (2006). The effect of task complexity and language proficiency on task-based language performance. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 3(4), 193–225.Google Scholar

Ishikawa, T. (2008). The effect of task demands of intentional reasoning on L2 speech performance. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 5(1), 29–63.Google Scholar

Jaworski, A. (Ed.) (1997). Silence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. (2003). World Englishes: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. (2007). English as a Lingua Franca: Attitude and Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. (2015). Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a Lingua Franca. Englishes in Practice, 2(3), 49–85.Google Scholar

Jin, L. and Cortazzi, M. (Eds.) (2011). Researching Chinese Learners’ Skills, Perceptions and Intercultural Adaptations. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

de Jong, N. and Perfetti, C. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralisation. Language Learning, 61(2), 533–568.Google Scholar

de Jong, N. H. (2016). Predicting pauses in L1 and L2 speech: The effects of utterance boundaries and word frequency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 113–132.Google Scholar

de Jong, N. H. (2018). Fluency in second language testing: Insights from different disciplines. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 237–254.Google Scholar

de Jong, N. H. and Bosker, H. (2013). Choosing a threshold for silent pauses to measure second language fluency. In Eklund, R. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech (DiSS) (pp. 17–20). Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).Google Scholar

de Jong, N. H., Groenhout, R., Schoonen, R. and Hulstijn, J. (2015). Second language fluency: Speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 223–243.Google Scholar

de Jong, N. H., Steinel, M., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R. and Hulstijn, J. (2013). Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(5), 893–916.Google Scholar

de Jong, N. H. and Vercellotti, M. (2015). Similar prompts may not be similar in the performance they elicit: Examining fluency, complexity, accuracy, and lexis in narratives from five picture prompts. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 387–404.Google Scholar

Kachru, B. (1985). Standard, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle. In Quirk, R. and Widdowson, H. (Eds.), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kahng, J. (2014). Exploring utterance and cognitive fluency of L1 and L2 English speakers: Temporal measures and stimulated recall. Language Learning, 64(4), 809–854.Google Scholar

Kan, Q., Owen, N. and Bax, S. (2018). Researching mobile-assisted Chinese-character learning strategies among adult distance learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 56–71.Google Scholar

Kang, O. and Johnson, D. (2018). Contribution of suprasegmental to English speaking proficiency: Human rater and automated scoring system. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(2), 150–168.Google Scholar

Kang, O., Rubin, D. and Kermad, A. (2019). The effects of training and rater differences on oral proficiency assessment. Language Testing, 36(4), 481–504.Google Scholar

Kasper, G. and Kellerman, E. (Eds.) (1997). Communication Strategies: Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Kim, J., Dewey, D., Baker-Smemoe, W., Ring, S., Westover, A. and Eggett, D. (2015). L2 development during study abroad in China. System, 55, 123‒133.Google Scholar

Kinginger, C. (2011). Enhancing language learning in study abroad. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 58–73.Google Scholar

Koponen, M. and Riggenbach, H. (2000). Overview: Varying perspectives on fluency. In Riggenbach, H. (Ed.), Perspectives on Fluency (pp. 5–24). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Kormos, J. (1999). Monitoring and self-repair in L2. Language Learning, 49, 303–342.Google Scholar

Kormos, J. (2006). Speech Production and Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kormos, J. and Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32, 145–164.Google Scholar

Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. and Bialystok, E. (2013). Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 497–514.Google Scholar

Kroll, J., Bobb, S. and Hoshino, N. (2014). Two languages in mind: Bilingualism as a tool to investigate language, cognition, and the brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 159–163.Google Scholar

Kuhl, J. (1994). A theory of action and state orientations. In Kuhl, J. and Beckmann, J. (Eds.), Volition and Personality (pp. 9–46). Gottingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.Google Scholar

Lambert, C., Kormos, J. and Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 167–196.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. and Frawley, W. (1988). Proficiency. Understanding the construct. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10(1), 181–195.Google Scholar

Lazaraton, A. (1996). Interlocutor support in oral proficiency interviews: the case of CASE. Language Testing, 13(2), 151–172.Google Scholar

Lazaraton, A. (1998). An analysis of differences in linguistics features of candidates at different levels of the IELTS speaking test. Report prepared for the EFL division, University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar

Lazaraton, A. (2002). Studies in Language Testing, No. 14: A Qualitative Approach to the Validation of Oral Language Tests. Cambridge, UK: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leeson, R. (1975). Fluency and Language Teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Léger, D. and Storch, N. (2009). Learners’ perceptions and attitudes: Implications for willingness to communicate in an L2 classroom. System, 37, 269–285.Google Scholar

Lehtonen, J. (1978). On the problems of measuring fluency. In Leiwo, M. and Räsänen, A. (Eds.), AFinLA Yearbook 1978 (pp. 53–68). Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto.Google Scholar

Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40(3), 387–417.Google Scholar

Lennon, P. (2000). The lexical element in spoken second language fluency. In Riggenbach, H. (Ed.), Perspectives on Fluency (pp. 25–42). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Leung, C. (2005). Convivial communication: Recontextualising communicative competence. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 119–144.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 41, 41–104.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. (1999). Language production: a blueprint of the speaker. In Brown, C. and Hagoort, P. (Eds.), Neurocognition of Language (pp. 83–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the Lexical Approach: Putting Theory into Practice. Hove, England: Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar

Lin, H. (2014). Establishing an empirical link between computer-mediated communication and SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning Technology, 18(3), 120–147.Google Scholar

Liyanage, I. and Gardner, R. (2013). Assessing fluency: Are the criteria fair? Classroom Discourse, 41(1), 27–41.Google Scholar

Llanes, À. and Muñoz, C. (2009). A short stay abroad: Does it make a difference? System, 37(3), 353–365.Google Scholar

Long, M. (2015). Second Language Acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Long, M. and Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27–56.Google Scholar

Louwerse, M. and Mitchell, H. (2003). Toward a taxonomy of a set of discourse markers in dialog: A theoretical and computational linguistic account. Discourse Processes, 35(3), 199–239.Google Scholar

Loy, J., Rohde, H. and Corley, M. (2017). Effects of disfluency in online interpretation of deception. Cognitive Science, 41, 1434–1456.Google Scholar

Lu, Y. (Ed.) (2017). Teaching and Learning Chinese in Higher Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lynch, T. and Maclean, J. (2000). Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4, 221–250.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, P., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z. and Noels, K. (1998). Conceptualising willingness to communicate in an L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, P. and Doucette, J. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control. System, 38, 161–171.Google Scholar

Magne, V., Suzuki, S., Suzukida, Y., Ilkan, M., Tran, M. and Saito, K. (2019). Exploring the dynamic nature of second language listeners’ perceived fluency: A mixed-methods approach. TESOL Quarterly, 53(4), 1139–1150.Google Scholar

Marshall, R. (2000). Speech fluency and aphasia. In Riggenbach, H. (Ed.), Perspectives on Fluency (pp. 220–240). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

McCarthy, M. (2010). Spoken fluency revisited. English Profile Journal, 1, 1–15.Google Scholar

McEnery, T. and Xiao, R. (2004). The Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese: A corpus for monolingual and contrastive language study. In Lino, M., Xavier, M., Ferreire, F., Costa, R. and Silva, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (pp. 1175–1178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McFarland, D. (2001). Respiratory markers of conversational interaction. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 128–143.Google Scholar

McLeod, S. and Goldstein, B. (2012). Multilingual Aspects of Speech Sound Disorders in Children. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83–108.Google Scholar

MFL subject content for General Certificate in Secondary Education (GCSE) (2015). Department for Education in England. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/485567/GCSE_subject_content_modern_foreign_langs.pdf.Google Scholar

Michel, M. (2011). Effects of task complexity and interaction on L2 performance. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance (pp. 141–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Michel, M. (2017). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in L2 production. In Loewen, S. and Sato, M. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (pp. 66–84). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R., Dominguez, L., Arche, M., Myles, F. and Marsden, E. (2008). SPLLOC: A new database for Spanish second language acquisition research. EuroSLA Yearbook, 8(1), 287–304.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R., Tracy-Ventura, N. and McManus, K. (2015). Social Interaction, Identity and Language Learning during Residence Abroad. EuroSLA Monograph Series, 4. Amsterdam: The European Second Language Association.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R., Tracy-Ventura, T. and McManus, K. (2017). Anglophone Students Abroad: Identity, Social Relationships, and Language Learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mizera, G. (2006). Working memory and L2 oral fluency. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

Mochizuki, N. and Ortega, L. (2008). Balancing communication and grammar in beginning-level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research, 12(1), 11–37.Google Scholar

Mohan, B. (1991). LEP students and the integration of language and content: Knowledge structures and tasks. In Stein, A. (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Research Symposium on Limited English Proficient Students’ Issues (pp. 113–160). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Bilingual Education Research and Evaluation.Google Scholar

Möhle, D. (1984). A comparison of the second language speech production of different native speakers. In Dechert, H.W., Möhle, D. and Raupach, M. (Eds.), Second Language Productions (pp. 26–49). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar

Mondada, L. and Doehler, S.P. (2004), Second language acquisition as situated practice: task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 501–518.Google Scholar

Mora, J. M. and Valls-Ferrer, M. (2012). Oral fluency, accuracy and complexity in formal instruction and study abroad learning contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 610–641.Google Scholar

Morales-Lopez, E. (2000). Fluency levels and the organization of conversation in non-native Spanish speakers’ speech. In Riggenbach, H. (Ed.), Perspectives on Fluency (pp. 266–286). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Morrison, A. (2018). Fluency in the Chilean Classroom. London: British Council. Available at: https://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/attachments/astrid_morrison_university_of_reading_dissertation.pdf [Accessed 29 October 2019].Google Scholar

Moyer, A. (2004). Age, Accent and Experience in Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Moyer, A. (2013). An investigation of experience in L2 phonology: Does quality matter more than quantity? Canadian Modern Language Review, 67(2), 191–216.Google Scholar

Myles, F. (2004). From data to theory: The over-representation of linguistic knowledge in SLA. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102(2), 139–168.Google Scholar

Myles, F. and Cordier, C. (2017). Formulaic sequence (FS) cannot be an umbrella term in SLA: Focusing on psycholinguistic FSs and their identification. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 3–28.Google Scholar

Nakane, I. (2006). Silence and politeness in intercultural communication in university seminars. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(11), 1811–1835.Google Scholar

Nakatani, Y. (2006). Developing an oral communication strategy inventory. Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 151–168.Google Scholar

Nakatsuhara, F. (2011). Effects of the number of participants on group oral test performance, Language Testing, 28(4), 483–508.Google Scholar

Nakatsuhara, F. (2012). The relationship between test-takers’ listening proficiency and their performance on the IELTS Speaking Test. In Taylor, L. and Weir, C. (Eds.), IELTS Collected Papers 2: Research in Reading and Listening Assessment (pp. 519–573). Cambridge, UK: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nakatsuhara, F. (2014). A Research Report on the Development of the Test of English for Academic Purposes (TEAP) Speaking Test for Japanese University Entrants – Study 1 and Study 2. Available online at: www.eiken.or.jp/teap/group/pdf/teap_speaking_report1.pdf [Accessed 29 October 2019].Google Scholar

Nakatsuhara, F., Tavakoli, P. and Awwad, A. (2019). Towards a model of multi-dimensional performance of C1 level speakers assessed in the Aptis Speaking Test. ARAGs Research Report Online. London: British Council.Google Scholar

Nation, I. (1989). Improving speaking fluency. System, 17(3), 377–384.Google Scholar

Nattinger, J. and DeCarrico, J. (1992). Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nitta, R. and Nakatsuhara, F. (2014). A multifaceted approach to investigating pre-task planning effects on paired oral test performance. Language Testing, 31(2), 147–175.Google Scholar

Norris, J. and Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578.Google Scholar

Norton, B. (2013). Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Freed, B. and Collentine, J. (2007). Phonological memory predicts second language oral fluency gains in adults. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 557–581.Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, B. and Dunlea, J. (2015). Aptis Genearal Technical Manual Ver 1.0 TR/2015/005. Available at: www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/aptis_general_technical_manual_v-1.0.pdf [Accessed 29 October 2019].Google Scholar

Oppenheim, N. (2000). The importance of recurrent sequences for non-native speaker fluency and cognition. In Riggenbach, H. (Ed.), Perspectives on Fluency (pp. 220–240). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Ortega, L. (2005). What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In Ellis, R. (Ed.), Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language (pp. 77–110). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Osaka, M. and Osaka, N. (1992). Language-independent working memory as measured by Japanese and English reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30(4), 287–289.Google Scholar

Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30, 590–601.Google Scholar

Pallotti, G. (2017). Assessing tasks: The case of interactional difficulty. Applied Linguistics, 40(1), 176–197.Google Scholar

Pawley, A. and Syder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Richards, J. and Schmidt, R. (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 191–226). New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Pawley, A. and Syder, F. (2000). The one-clause-at-a-time hypothesis. In Riggenbach, H. (Ed.), Perspectives on Fluency (pp. 163–199). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Payne, J. and Whitney, P. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 7–32.Google Scholar

Peets, K. (2009). The effects of context on the classroom discourse skills of children with language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(1), 5–16.Google Scholar

Pekarek Doehler, S. and Berger, S. (2018). L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 555–578.Google Scholar

Pellegrino, F., Coupé, C. and Marsico, E. (2011). A cross-language perspective on speech information rate. Language, 87, 539–558.Google Scholar

Peltonen, P. (2017). Temporal fluency and problem-solving in interaction: An exploratory study of fluency resources in L2 dialogue. System, 70, 1–13.Google Scholar

Peltonen, P. (2018). Exploring connections between first and second language fluency: A mixed methods approach. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 676–692.Google Scholar

Perez Vidal, C. (Ed.) (2014). Language Acquisition in Study Abroad and Formal Instruction Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Pope, B., Blass, T., Siegman, A. and Raher, J. (1970). Anxiety and depression in speech. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35(1), 128–145.Google Scholar

Prabhu, N. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Préfontaine, Y. (2013). Perceptions of French fluency in second language speech production. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(3), 324–348.Google Scholar

Préfontaine, Y. (2015). Perceptions of French fluency in second language speech production. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(3), 324.Google Scholar

Préfontaine, Y. and Kormos, J. (2016). A qualitative analysis of perceptions of fluency in second language French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 151–169.Google Scholar

Préfontaine, Y., Kormos, J. and Johnson, D. (2016). How do utterance measures predict raters’ perceptions of fluency in French as a second language? Language Testing, 33(1), 53–73.Google Scholar

Prins, R., Snow, C. and Wagenaar, E. (1978). Recovery from aphasia: Spontaneous speech versus language comprehension. Brain and Language, 6(1), 192–211.Google Scholar

Quené, H. (2008). Multilevel modeling of between-speaker and within-speaker variation in spontaneous speech tempo. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 1104–1113.Google Scholar

Rahimpour, M. (1997). Task Complexity, Task Condition, and Variation in L2 Oral Discourse. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar

Raupach, M. (1980). Cross-linguistic descriptions of speech performance as a contribution to contrastive psycholinguistics. In Dechert, H. and Raupach, M. (Eds.), Towards a Cross-Linguistic Assessment of Speech Production (pp. 9–22). Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar

Razagifard, P. (2013). The impact of text-based CMC on improving L2 oral fluency. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(30), 270–279.Google Scholar

Révész, A., Ekiert, M. and Torgersen, E. (2016). The effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance. Applied Linguistics, 37, 828‒848.Google Scholar

Riazantseva, A. (2001). Second language proficiency and pausing: A study of Russian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 497–526.Google Scholar

Riggenbach, H. (Ed.) (2000). Perspectives on Fluency. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Ringbom, H. (2007). Cross-Linguistic Similarity in Foreign Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45(1), 99–140.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2003). The Cognition Hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21(2), 45–105.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43(1), 1–32.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(3), 193–213.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (Ed.) (2011). Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Language Learning and Performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2015). The Cognition Hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In Bygate, M. (Ed.), Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT (pp. 87–121). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, L. and Torres, M. (2006). Spontaneous speech events in two speech databases of human-computer and human-human dialogs in Spanish. Language and Speech, 49(3), 333–366.Google Scholar

Rossiter, M. J. (2003). The effects of affective strategy instruction in the ESL classroom. In special issue: strategy research and training (N. J. Anderson, Ed.). TESL-EJ, 7 (2), 1–20.Google Scholar

Rossiter, M. (2009). Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65, 395–412.Google Scholar

Rossiter, M., Derwing, T., Manimtim, L. G. and Thomson, R. I. (2010). Oral fluency: The neglected component in the communicative language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 583–606.Google Scholar

Saito, K., Ilkan, M., Magne, V., Tran, M. and Suzuki, S. (2018). Acoustic characteristics and learner profiles of low, mid and high-level second language fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39, 593–617.Google Scholar

Saito, K., Trofimovich, P. and Isaacs, T. (2017). Using listener judgements to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 38, 439–462.Google Scholar

Samuda, V. and Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in Second Language Learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Sanz, C. (2014). Contributions of study abroad research to our understanding of SLA processes and outcomes: The Sala project. In Perez Vidal, C. (Ed.), Language Acquisition in Study Abroad and Formal Instruction Contexts (pp. 1–13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sanz, C. and Morales-Front, A. (Eds.) (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Study Abroad Research and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sasaki, M. (2011). Effects of varying lengths of study abroad experiences on Japanese EFL students’ L2 writing ability and motivation: A longitudinal study. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 81–105.Google Scholar

Savignon, S. (1972). Communicative Competence: An Experiment in Foreign Language Teaching. Philadelphia: The Centre for Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Savignon, S. (2007). Beyond communicative language teaching: What’s ahead? Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 207–220.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1–63.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. (2001). Accounts of conduct in interaction: Interruption, overlap and turn-taking. In Turner, J. (Ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory (pp. 287–321). New York: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Schmidt, M. and Fägersten, K. B. (2010). Disfluency markers in L1 attrition. Language Learning, 60, 753–791.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357–385.Google Scholar

Schneider, W. and Schiffrin, R. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.Google Scholar

Schumann, J. (1986). An acculturation model for second language acquisition. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 7, 379–392.Google Scholar

Scrivener, J. (1994). Learning Teaching: A Guidebook for English Language Teachers. Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Seedhouse, P. (2004). The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Seedhouse, P. (2013). Oral proficiency interviews as varieties of interaction. In Ross, S. and Kasper, G. (Eds.), Assessing Second Language Pragmatics (pp. 199–219). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Seedhouse, P. and Egbert, M. (2006). The interactional organisation of the IELTS Speaking Test. IELTS Research Reports, 6(6), 161–205.Google Scholar

Seedhouse, P. and Nakatsuhara, F. (2018). The Discourse of the IELTS Speaking Test: Interactional Design and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Segalowitz, N. (2000). Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance. In Riggenbach, H. (Ed.), Perspectives on Fluency (pp. 200–219). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Segalowitz, N. (2003). Automaticity and second languages. In Doughty, C. and Long, M. (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 382–408). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Segalowitz, N. (2010). The Cognitive Bases of Second Language Fluency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Segalowitz, N. (2016). Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 79–95.Google Scholar

Segalowitz, N. and Freed, B. (2004). Context, contact and cognition on oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 173–199.Google Scholar

Segalowitz, N. and Segalowitz, S. (1993). Skilled performance, practice and the differentiation of speed-up from automatisation effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 369–385.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, B. (2001). Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a Lingua Franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 133–158.Google Scholar

Seifoori, Z. and Vahidi, Z. (2012). The impact of fluency strategy training on Iranian EFL learners’ speech under online planning conditions. Language Awareness, 21, 101–112.Google Scholar

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 209–231.Google Scholar

Sheen, R. (2003). Focus on form: A myth in the making? ELT Journal, 57(3), 225–233.Google Scholar

Sheen, R. (2005). Focus on forms as a means of improving accurate oral production. In Housen, A. and Pierrard, M. (Eds.), Investigations in Language Acquisition (pp. 271–310). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Shei, C., Zikpi, M. and Chao, D.-L. (Eds.) (2019). Routledge Handbook of Chinese Language Teaching. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Shiri, S. (2013). Learners' attitudes toward regional dialects and destination preferences in study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 46(4), 565–587.Google Scholar

Shively, R. (2011). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad: A longitudinal study of Spanish service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1818–1835.Google Scholar

Shohamy, E. (2011). Assessing multilingual competencies: Adopting construct valid assessment policies. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 418–429.Google Scholar

Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Siegman, A. and Pope, B. (1966). Ambiguity and verbal fluency in the tat. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 30(3), 239–245.Google Scholar

Siyanova-Chanturia, A. and Van Lancker Sidtis, D. (2018). What on-line processing tells us about formulaic language. In Siyanova-Chanturia, A. and Pellicer-Sanchez, A. (Eds.), Understanding Formulaic Language: A Second Language Acquisition Perspective. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38‒62.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2001). Tasks and language performance assessment. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P. and Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching Pedagogic Tasks (pp. 167–185). London: Longman.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2003). Task based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1–14.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2014). Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy. In Skehan, P. (Ed.), Processing Perspectives on Task Performance (pp. 211–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2015). Limited Attention Capacity and Cognition: Two hypotheses regarding second language performance on tasks. In Bygate, M. (Ed.), Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT (pp. 123–156). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Skehan, P., Foster, P. and Shum, S. (2016). Ladders and snakes in second language fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 97–112.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. and Shum, S. (2014). Structure and processing condition in video-based narrative retelling. In Skehan, P. (Ed.), Processing Perspectives on Task Performance (pp. 187–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Slabakova, R. (2012). L2 knowledge at the mapping of syntax and discourse. Second Language, 11, 5–23.Google Scholar

Smith, S. (2011). Corpus-based tasks for learning Chinese: A data-driven approach. The Asian Conference on Technology in the Classroom Official Conference Proceedings, 2011, 48–59.Google Scholar

Spada, N. (1986). The interaction between type of contact and type of instruction: Some effects on the l2 proficiency of adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8(2), 181–199.Google Scholar

Stowe, L. and Sabourin, L. (2005). Imaging the processing of a second language: Effects of maturation and proficiency on the neural processes involved. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43(4), 329–353.Google Scholar

Sun, Y.-C. (2012). Examining the effectiveness of extensive speaking practice via voice blogs in a foreign language learning context. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 494–506.Google Scholar

Sunderman, G. and Kroll, J. (2009). When study-abroad experience fails to deliver: The internal resources threshold effect. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(1), 79–100.Google Scholar

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In Cook, G. and Seidlhofer, B. (Eds.), Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Taguchi, N. (2007). Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic comprehension in English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 313–338.Google Scholar

Taguchi, N. (2011). The effect of L2 proficiency and study-abroad experience on pragmatic comprehension. Language Learning, 61, 904–939.Google Scholar

Tannen, D. (1984). The pragmatics of cross-cultural communication. Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 189–195.Google Scholar

Tannen, D. (2012). Turn-taking and intercultural discourse and communication. In Paulston, C., Kiesling, S. and Rangel, E. (Eds.), The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication (pp. 135–157). London: Wiley.Google Scholar

Tao, H. (Ed.) (2016). Integrating Chinese Linguistic Research and Language Teaching and Learning. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P. (2004). Oral narrative tasks and second language performance: An investigation of task characteristics. Unpublished PhD thesis, Kings College London.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P. (2009a). Investigating task difficulty: learners’ and teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1–25.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P. (2009b). Assessing L2 task performance: Understanding the effects of task design. System, 37(3), 482–495.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P. (2011). Pausing patterns: Differences between L2 learners and native speakers. ELT Journal, 65(1), 71–79.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P. (2016). Fluency in monologic and dialogic task performance: Challenges in defining and measuring L2 fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 133–150.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P. (2018). L2 development in an intensive Study Abroad EAP context. System, 72(1), 62–74.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P., Campbell, C. and McCormack, J. (2016). Development of speech fluency over a short period of time: Effects of pedagogic intervention. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 447–471.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P. and Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58(2), 439–473.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P. and Hunter, A.-M. (2018). Is fluency being ‘neglected’ in the classroom? Teacher understanding of fluency and related classroom practices. Language Teaching Research, 22(3), 330–349.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P., Kendon, G., Hunter, A.-M. and Slaght, J. (forthcoming). TEEP Speaking test fluency rating scales across four levels of proficiency. Internal Report, International Study and Language Institute, University of Reading.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P., Nakatsuhara, F. and Hunter, A.-M. (2017). Scoring validity of the Aptis Speaking Test: Investigating fluency across tasks and levels of proficiency. ARAGs Research Reports Online. London: British Council.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P., Nakatsuhara, F. and Hunter, A.-M. (2020). Aspects of oral fluency across assessed levels of proficiency: Do ‘fluency profiles’ for different proficiency levels exist? Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 169–191.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P. and Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In Ellis, R. (Ed.), Planning and Task Performance (pp. 239–273). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P. and Uchihara, T. (2019). To what extent are multiword sequences associated with oral fluency? Language Learning, 70(2), 506–547.Google Scholar

Taylor, L. and Galaczi, E. (2011). Scoring validity. In Taylor, L. (Ed.), Examining Speaking: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Speaking, Studies in Language Testing volume 30 (pp. 171–233). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Temple, L. (1997). Memory and processing modes in language learner speech production. Communication and Cognition, 30(1/2), 75–90.Google Scholar

Tian, Y., Maruyama, T. and Ginzburg, J. (2017). Self-addressed questions and filled pauses: A cross-linguistic investigation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(4), 905–922.Google Scholar

Towell, R. and Dewaele, J.-M. (2005). The role of psycholinguistic factors in the development of fluency amongst advanced learners of French. In Dewaele, J.-M. (Ed.), Focus on French as a Foreign Language: Multidisciplinary Approaches (pp. 210–239). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Towell, R., Hawkins, R. and Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17, 84–119.Google Scholar

Trentman, E. (2013). Arabic and English during study abroad in Cairo, Egypt: Issues of access and use. The Modern Language Journal, 97(2), 457–473.Google Scholar

Truong, A. T. and Storch, N. (2007). Investigating group planning in preparation for oral presentations in an EFL class in Vietnam. Regional Language Centre Journal, 38(1), 104–124.Google Scholar

Tullock, B. and Ortega, L. (2017). Fluency and multilingualism in study abroad: Lessons from a scoping review. System, 71, 7‒21.Google Scholar

Umino, T. and Benson, P. (2016). Communities of practice in study abroad: A four-year study of an Indonesian student’s experience in Japan. The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 757–769.Google Scholar

Vanderplank, R. (1993). ‘Pacing’ and ‘spacing’ as predictors of difficulty in speaking and understanding English. ELT Journal, 47(2), 117–125.Google Scholar

Verhoeven, J., de Pauw, G. and Kloots, H. (2004). Speech rate in a pluricentric language: A comparison between Dutch in Belgium and the Netherlands. Language and Speech, 47, 297–308.Google Scholar

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wang, C., Bristol, T., Mowen, J. and Chakraborty, G. (2000). Alternative models of self-construal: Dimensions of connectedness-separateness and advertising appeals to the country and gender-specific self. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9, 107–115.Google Scholar

Wang, J., Na, A. and Wright, C. (2018). Enhancing beginner learners’ oral proficiency in a flipped Chinese Foreign Language classroom. Computer-Aided Language Learning, 31(5–6), 490–521.Google Scholar

Watanabe, M., Hirose, K., Den, Y. and Minematsu, N. (2008). Filled pauses as cues to the complexity of upcoming phrases for native and non-native listeners. Speech Communication, 50(2), 81–94.Google Scholar

Weissheimer, J. and Mota, M. (2009). Individual differences in working memory capacity and the development of L2 speech production. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 17, 34–52.Google Scholar

Wennerstrom, A. (2000). The role of intonation in second language fluency. In Riggenbach, H. (Ed.), Perspectives on Fluency (pp. 102–127). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

White, L. (2003). Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Widdowson, H. (1983). Learning Purpose and Language Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, M., Mercer, S. and Ryan, S. (2016). Exploring Psychology in Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, M. and Wilson, T. (2005). An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 957–968.Google Scholar

Winke, P. and Gass, S. (2013). The influence of second language experience and accent familiarity on oral proficiency rating: A qualitative investigation. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 762–789.Google Scholar

Witkins, G., Morere, D. and Geer, L. (2013). Establishment of a phenomic clustering system for American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 14(1), 1–28.Google Scholar

Witton-Davies, G. (2014). The study of fluency and its development in monologue and dialogue. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University.Google Scholar

Wolf, J. (2008). The effects of backchannels on fluency in L2 oral task production. System, 36, 279–294.Google Scholar

Wood, D. (2009). Effects of focused instruction of formulaic sequences on fluent expression in second language narratives: A case study. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 39–57.Google Scholar

Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic Language and Second Language Speech Fluency: Background, Evidence and Classroom Applications. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Wood, D. (2016). Willingness to communicate and second language speech fluency: An idiodynamic investigation. System, 60, 11–28.Google Scholar

Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21, 463–489.Google Scholar

Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wray, A. and Fitzpatrick, T. (2008). Why can’t you just leave it alone? Deviations from memorized language as a gauge of nativelike competence. In Meunier, F. and Granger, S. (Eds.), Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 123–148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Wright, C. (2010). Working Memory in SLA. Saarbrucken: VDM Publishing.Google Scholar

Wright, C. (2013). An investigation of working memory effects on oral grammatical accuracy and fluency in producing questions in English. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 352–374.Google Scholar

Wright, C. (2018a). Effects of time and task on L2 Mandarin Chinese language development during study abroad. In Sanz, C. and Front-Morales, A. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Study Abroad Research and Practice (pp. 166–180). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wright, C. (2018b). Research in memory and processing in SLA. In Wright, C., Young-Scholten, M. and Piske, T. (Eds.), Mind Matters in SLA (pp. 203–219). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Wright, C. (2019). Developing communicative competence in adult beginner learners of Chinese. In Shei, C., Zikpi, M. and Chao, D.-L. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Chinese Language Teaching (pp. 134–148). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wright, C. (2020). Task effects on L2 Mandarin fluency development in monologic and dialogic speech. Journal of Second Language Studies.Google Scholar

Wright, C., Lin, M. and Tsakalaki, A. (forthcoming). Teaching Academic Interactional Competence: Moving beyond performative competence in EAP settings. JRIE Journal.Google Scholar

Wright, C. and Schartner, A. (2013). ‘I can’t … I won’t?’ International students at the threshold of social adaptation. Journal of Research in International Education, 12(2), 113–128.Google Scholar

Wright, C. and Tavakoli, P. (2016). New directions and developments in defining, analyzing and measuring L2 speech fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 73–76.Google Scholar

Wright, C. and Zhang, C. (2014). Examining the effects of study abroad on L2 Chinese development among UK university learners. Newcastle and Northumbria Working Papers in Linguistics, 20, 67–83.Google Scholar

Xing, J. (2006). Teaching and Learning Chinese as a Foreign Language: A Pedagogic Grammar. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar

Yang, B. (2012). How do pauses reveal linguistic plans by L2 learners of Chinese? In Ma, Q. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 390–393). Shanghai: Tongji University Press.Google Scholar

Young, R. (2003). Learning to talk the talk and walk the walk: Interactional competence in academic spoken English. North Eastern Illinois University Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 26–44.Google Scholar

Young, R. (2011). Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning Vol. 2, (pp. 426–443). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Yuan, F. and Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27.Google Scholar

Yule, G. (2003). The Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zhang, G. and Li, L. (2010). Chinese language teaching in the UK. The Language Learning Journal, 38, 87–97.Google Scholar

Zhao, Y. (2011). Review article: A tree in the wood: A review of research on L2 Chinese acquisition. Second Language Research, 27, 559–572.Google Scholar

Zhou, X. and Marslen-Wilson, W. (1994). Words, morphemes and syllables in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 393–422.Google Scholar