Book contents
- A Qualified Hope
- Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy
- A Qualified Hope
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I The Supreme Court of India – An Institutional Overview
- Part II The Supreme Court of India, Social and Political Mobilization
- 6 The Art of Buying Time
- 7 Court as a Symbolic Resource
- 8 PUCL v. Union of India
- Part III Welfare Rights and the Environment
- Part IV Discrimination
- Conclusion
- References
6 - The Art of Buying Time
Street Vendor Politics and Legal Mobilization in Metropolitan India
from Part II - The Supreme Court of India, Social and Political Mobilization
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 August 2019
Book contents
- A Qualified Hope
- Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy
- A Qualified Hope
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I The Supreme Court of India – An Institutional Overview
- Part II The Supreme Court of India, Social and Political Mobilization
- 6 The Art of Buying Time
- 7 Court as a Symbolic Resource
- 8 PUCL v. Union of India
- Part III Welfare Rights and the Environment
- Part IV Discrimination
- Conclusion
- References
Summary
By the 1990s, India’s appellate courts had become closely involved in the regulation of street vending in several metropolitan cities. However, despite the frequent use of legal mechanisms by street vendor collectives, there has been little progress towards “formalization” of the street vending economy. To understand the limited impacts of legal intervention, it is necessary to examine the timing and the circumstances under which street vendor collectives first turned to judicial forums for protecting their livelihoods. Based on a historical examination of street vendor politics in Bombay and Madras, I show that legal mobilization in both instances was a response to serious threats faced by the political regimes that had previously shielded street vendors from dispossession and exploitation, rather than being a direct result of new legal opportunities (such as the emergence of public interest litigation). Since organized street vendors had a strong preference for maintaining the status quo, litigation was used as an effective method for buying time in the face of a hostile or uncertain political environment, even when the ultimate verdict was not likely to favor street vendors.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Qualified HopeThe Indian Supreme Court and Progressive Social Change, pp. 151 - 183Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Alva, Rohan J. “The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Bill, 2013: Is the Cure Worse Than the Disease?” Statute Law Review 35, no. 2 (2014): 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anjaria, Jonathan Shapiro. “Street Hawkers and Public Space in Mumbai.” Economic and Political Weekly 41, no. 21 (2006): 2140–2146.Google Scholar
Anjaria, Jonathan Shapiro. “Ordinary States: Everyday Corruption and the Politics of Space in Mumbai.” American Ethnologist 38, no. 1 (2011): 58–72.Google Scholar
Anjaria, Jonathan Shapiro. “Guardians of the Bourgeois City: Citizenship, Public Space, and Middle‐Class Activism in Mumbai.” City & Community 8, no. 4 (2009): 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, Ritajyoti. “Politics of Archiving: Hawkers and Pavement Dwellers in Calcutta.” Dialectical Anthropology 35, no. 3 (2011): 295–316.Google Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, Ritajyoti. “Institutionalizing Informality: The Hawkers’ Question in Post-Colonial Calcutta.” Modern Asian Studies 50, no. 2 (2016): 675–717.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra. “Taking Suffering Seriously: Social Action Litigation in the Supreme Court of India.” Third World Legal Studies (1985): 107–132.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Ela R. We are Poor but So Many: The Story of Self-Employed Women in India. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, Sharit K. “Street Vendors in Asia: A Review.” Economic and Political Weekly (2005): 2256–2264.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, Sharit K. “Social Security for Street Vendors.” Seminar 568 (2006): 49, www.india-seminar.com/2006/568/568_sharit_k_bhowmik.htm.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, Sharit K., and Saha, Debdulal. Street Vending in Ten Cities in India. National Association of Street Vendors of India, 2012, www.streetnet.org.za/docs/research/2012/en/NASVIReport-Survey.pdf.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, Sharit K., and More, Nitin. “Coping with Urban Poverty: Ex-Textile Mill Workers in Central Mumbai.” Economic and Political Weekly (2001): 4822–4827.Google Scholar
Bhuwania, Anuj. “Courting the People: The Rise of Public Interest Litigation in Post-Emergency India.” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 34, no. 2 (2014): 314–335.Google Scholar
Bhuwania, Anuj. “Public Interest Litigation as a Slum Demolition Machine.” Projections: The MIT Journal of Planning 12 (2016): 67.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas. “Civil Rights meet Civil Engineering: Urban Public Space and Traffic Logic.” Canadian Journal of Law & Society 22, no. 2 (2007): 55–72.Google Scholar
Bromley, Ray. “Street Vending and Public Policy: A Global Review.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 20, no. 1/2 (2000): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandavarkar, Raj. “From Neighbourhood to Nation: The Rise and Fall of the Left in Bombay’s Girangaon in the Twentieth Century.” In Menon, Meena and Adarkar, Neera (eds.), One Hundred Years, One Hundred Voices: The Mill Workers of Girangaon: An Oral History. Kolkata: Seagull, 2004.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. Lineages of Political Society: Studies in Postcolonial Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. “Introduction: Postcolonial Legalism.” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 34, no. 2 (2014): 224–227.Google Scholar
Clibbens, Patrick. “‘The Destiny of this City is to be the Spiritual Workshop of the Nation’: Clearing Cities and Making Citizens during the Indian Emergency, 1975–1977.” Contemporary South Asia 22, no. 1 (2014): 51–66.Google Scholar
Coelho, K., & Venkat, T. The Politics of Civil Society: Neighbourhood Associationism in Chennai. Economic and Political Weekly (2009): 358–367.Google Scholar
Cortner, Richard C. “Strategies and Tactics of Litigants in Constitutional Cases.” Journal of Public Law 17 (1968): 287.Google Scholar
Cross, John Christopher. Informal Politics: Street Vendors and the State in Mexico City. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Daily News and Analysis, “BMC seeks HC help to get rid of hawkers,” December 17, 2012.Google Scholar
de Sousa Santos, Boaventura. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
de Wit, Joop. “Clientelism, Competition and Poverty: The Ineffectiveness of Local Organizations in a Madras Slum.” In Frans Schuurman & Ton Van Naerseen (eds.), Urban Social Movements in the Third World (1989): 90.Google Scholar
Dhavan, Rajeev. “Law as Struggle: Public Interest Law in India.” Journal of the Indian Law Institute 36, no. 3 (1994): 302–338.Google Scholar
Dixon, Rosalind. “Creating Dialogue about Socioeconomic Rights: Strong-Form versus Weak-Form Judicial Review Revisited.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 5, no. 3 (2007): 391–418.Google Scholar
Eckert, Julia. “Urban Governance and Emergent Forms of Legal Pluralism in Mumbai.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 36, no. 50 (2004): 29–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles R. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan S.. “Conformity, Contestation, and Resistance: An Account of Legal Consciousness.” New England Law Review 26 (1991): 731.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. “Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review 9, no. 1 (1974): 95–160.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. “The Radiating Effects of Courts.” In Keith D. Boyum & Lynn Mather (eds.), Empirical Theories of Courts (1983): 117–142.Google Scholar
Hansen, Thomas Blom. Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Hilson, Chris. “New Social Movements: The Role of Legal Opportunity.” Journal of European Public Policy 9, no. 2 (2002): 238–255.Google Scholar
Jhabvala, , “Foreword” in Bhowmik, Sharit K. (ed.). Street Vendors in the Global Urban Economy. New Delhi: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Kotiswaran, Prabha. “Sword or Shield? The Role of the Law in the Indian Sex Workers’ Movement.” Interventions 15, no. 4 (2013): 530–548.Google Scholar
Mahadevia, Darshini, and Narayanan, Harini. “Shanghaing Mumbai: Politics of Evictions and Resistance in Slum Settlements.” In Darshini Mahadevia (ed.), Inside the Transforming Urban Asia: Processes, Policies and Public Actions. Concept, 2008: 549–589.Google Scholar
Mate, Manoj. “The Rise of Judicial Governance in the Supreme Court of India.” Boston University International Law Journal 33 (2015): 169.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. “Dynamics of Contention.” Social Movement Studies 2, no. 1 (2003): 99–102.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. “Reform Litigation on Trial.” Law & Social Inquiry 17, no. 4 (1992): 715–743.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. “Law and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2 (2006): 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael, and Lovell, George I.. “Toward a Radical Politics of Rights.” In Gray, Paul Christopher (ed.), From the Streets to the State: Changing the World by Taking Power. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2018, 139–159.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Kenneth Bo. “Farmers’ Use of the Courts in an Anti-Land Acquisition Movement in India’s West Bengal.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 41, no. 59 (2009): 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Susan M. “Interest-Group Litigation in Federal District Court: Beyond the Political Disadvantage Theory.” The Journal of Politics 52, no. 3 (1990): 854–882.Google Scholar
Rajagopal, Arvind. “The Violence of Commodity Aesthetics: Hawkers, Demolition Raids, and a New Regime of Consumption.” Social Text 19, no. 3 (2001): 91–113.Google Scholar
Rajagopal, Arvind. “The Emergency as Prehistory of the New Indian Middle Class.” Modern Asian Studies 45, no. 5 (2011): 1003–1049.Google Scholar
Rajagopal, Balakrishnan. “Pro-Human Rights but Anti-Poor? A Critical Evaluation of the Indian Supreme Court from a Social Movement Perspective.” Human Rights Review 8, no. 3 (2007): 157–186.Google Scholar
Randeria, Shalini, and Grunder, Ciara. “The (Un)Making of Policy in the Shadow of the World Bank: Infrastructure Development, Urban Resettlement and the Cunning State in India.” In Shore, Chris, Wright, Susan, and Pero, Davide (eds.), Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power. Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2011: 187–204.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Garavito, Cesar. “Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socioeconomic Rights in Latin America.” Texas Law Review 89 (2010): 1669.Google Scholar
Roever, Sally. “Informal Trade meets Informal Governance: Street Vendors and Legal Reform in India, South Africa, and Peru.” Cityscape 18, no. 1 (2016): 27–46.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Simon, William H.. “Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds.” Harvard Law Review (2004): 1015–1101.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. “The Law is All Over: Power, Resistance and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor.” Yale Journal of Law & Humanities 2 (1990): 343.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Schindler, Seth. “Producing and Contesting the Formal/Informal Divide: Regulating Street Hawking in Delhi, India.” Urban Studies 51, no. 12 (2014): 2596–2612.Google Scholar
Solberg, Rorie Spill, and Waltenburg, Eric N.. “Why do Interest Groups Engage the Judiciary? Policy Wishes and Structural Needs.” Social Science Quarterly 87, no. 3 (2006): 558–572.Google Scholar
Subramanian, Narendra. Ethnicity and Populist Mobilization: Political Parties, Citizens and Democracy in South India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Te Lintelo, Dolf J. H. “Advocacy Coalitions Influencing Informal Sector Policy: The Case of India’s National Urban Street Vendors Policy.” In Bhowmik, Sharit K. (ed.), Street Vendors and the Global Urban Economy. New Delhi: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, and Tarrow, Sidney G.. Contentious Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. “Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK.” Law & Society Review 46, no. 3 (2012): 523–556.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Liza. “Democracy in the Globalizing Indian City: Engagements of Political Society and the State in Globalizing Mumbai.” Politics & Society 37, no. 3 (2009): 397–427.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by