Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T07:39:24.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Women’s Leadership across Cultures

Intersections, Barriers, and Leadership Development

from Section 4 - Work and Family Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2020

Fanny M. Cheung
Affiliation:
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Diane F. Halpern
Affiliation:
Claremont McKenna College, California
Get access

Summary

Gender equity in the workplace is not merely a moral imperative; it also affects the success of businesses and our ability to solve the world’s grand challenges. The gender gap in leadership is a global phenomenon rooted in cultural role expectations of men, women, and leaders. Although these expectations vary across cultures, women consistently face barriers from laws, socialization, formal organizational policies, and informal organizational practices that limit their opportunities to become leaders and inhibit their ability to be effective when they do obtain such positions. To address these barriers, we discuss how societies, organizations, and individual women and men around the world can facilitate women’s leadership through culturally-contextual leadership development strategies. We frame our discussion around the intersection of culture, gender, and leadership to understand how the interaction of these variables informs local considerations as to what barriers, and therefore interventions, are most relevant in their respective contexts

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Suggested Readings

Rebecca J. Reichard is an Associate Professor of Organizational Behavior at Claremont Graduate University. She directs LeAD Labs, an applied research consulting group focused on leadership development. Her research and practice emphasize the development of individuals with traditionally less access to leadership opportunities, including minorities, women, and LGBT+ individuals. Reichard earned a PhD in management from the University of Nebraska–Lincoln. She is an active member of the Academy of Management and the Society of Industrial/Organizational Psychology, and is the past-chair of the scholarship group for the International Leadership Association. She has published more than 40 journal articles and book chapters on leader development.

Leslie Trainor, MBA, is a doctoral student in Organizational Psychology at Claremont Graduate University and a Research Associate at LeAD Labs. Her research interests are women in leadership and toxic leadership. Trainor concurrently serves as the Deputy Director of the Riverside County Economic Development Agency where she oversees Economic Development, Workforce Development, the Office of Foreign Trade, Marketing, the Office of Film and Television, and several of the County’s nonprofit affiliates. Trainor has been involved in private-sector and public-sector business for over seventeen years and most enjoys helping others become self-empowered. Trainor’s parents were in the military, so she lived in several different countries, with the most time spent in Germany. Her favorite memories of living in Germany include all the wonderful candy at the local Trinkhalle, Volksmarching with her family, and eating freshly baked Brotchen. At her current job, she regularly hosts delegations from other countries and finds the variety of cultural norms to be completely fascinating

Krista Lynne Jensen is a doctoral student studying Positive Organizational Psychology and Women’s Studies at Claremont Graduate University. Her research focuses on taking an intersectional approach to understanding and facilitating the development of women leaders. Specifically, Jensen is interested in identifying, testing, and implementing evidence-based organizational intervention strategies to address barriers to women’s leadership development. Jensen graduated from Santa Clara University, California in 2014 with a degree in Psychology and a minor in Anthropology.

Inmaculada Macias-Alonso is a Research Fellow at the Women and Public Policy Program at Harvard Kennedy School. Her research focuses on the effects of sex and gender on the quantitative and qualitative content of feedback. Her most recent work contrasts the “think-manager-think-male” phenomenon with the “female leadership advantage” through the examination of leadership feedback provided to men and women. Macias-Alonso holds a PhD and MSc in Organizational Behavior from IE Business School (Spain), an MA in Area Studies from Leiden University, a BA in Political Science from Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, and a BA in Middle Eastern & Arabic Studies from Universidad Autonoma de Madrid. She has been a visiting lecturer at CESA School of Business in Bogota, a visiting graduate student at the Netherlands-Flemish Institute in Cairo, and an undergraduate exchange student at George Washington University in Washington, DC.

Cheung, F. M., & Halpern, D. F. (2010). Women at the top: Powerful leaders define success as work + family in a culture of gender. American Psychologist, 65, 182193. doi:10.1037/a0017309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, A. B., & Dzubinski, L. M. (2016). Making the invisible visible: A cross‐sector analysis of gender‐based leadership barriers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 27, 181206. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H. & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the Labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Ely, R. & Padavic, I. (2007). A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences. Academy of Management Review, 32, 11211143. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26585842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, D. F., & Cheung, F. M. (2008). Women at the top: Powerful leaders tell us how to combine work and family. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781444305210Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in contextOnline Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturm, S. (2001). Second generation employment discrimination: A structural approach. Columbia Law Review, 101(3), 458568. doi:10.2307/1123737Google Scholar

References

Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (2010). Leadership: Why gender and culture matter. American Psychologist, 65, 157170. doi:10.1037/a0018806Google Scholar
Bartol, K. M., & Zhang, X. (2007). Networks and leadership development: Building linkages for capacity acquisition and capital accrual. Human Resource Management Review, 17, 388401. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierema, L. L. (2016). Women’s leadership: Troubling notions of the “ideal” (male) leader. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18, 119136. doi:10.1177/1523422316641398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (Eds.). (2001). Gender, hierarchy, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 637655. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnahan, S., & Greenwood, B. N. (2018). Managers’ political beliefs and gender inequality among subordinates: Does his ideology matter more than hers? Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(2), 287322. doi:10.1177/0001839217708780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalyst, . (2016). Quick take: Statistical overview of women in the workplace. New York: Catalyst. www.catalyst.org/knowledge/statistical-overview-women-workforceGoogle Scholar
Chin, J. L. (2014). Women and leadership. In Day, D. V. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 733753). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.12.004Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. (2005a). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. (2005b). Change among gatekeepers: Men, masculinities, and gender equality in the global arena. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 18011825. doi:10.1086/427525Google Scholar
Cuddy, A. J. C., Wolf, E. B., Glick, P., Crotty, S., Chong, J., & Norton, M. I. (2015). Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 622635. doi:10.1037/pspi0000027CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 581613. doi:10.1016/S1048–9843(00)00061-8Google Scholar
Day, D. V., & Dragoni, L. (2015). Leadership development: An outcome-oriented review based on time and levels of analyses. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 133156. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111328Google Scholar
Den Hartog, D. N., House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., Abdalla, I. A., … Zhou, J. (1999). Culture-specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? Leadership Quarterly, 10, 219256. doi:10.1016/S1048–9843(99)00018-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35, 627647. doi:10.5465/amr.35.4.zok627Google Scholar
DeRue, D. S., & Myers, C. G. (2014). Leadership development: A review and agenda for future research. In Day, D. V. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 832858). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199755615.001.0001Google Scholar
Dickson, M. W., Den Hartog, D. N., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2003). Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress and raising new questions. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 729768. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.002Google Scholar
Diehl, A. B., & Dzubinski, L. M. (2016). Making the invisible visible: A cross‐sector analysis of gender‐based leadership barriers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 27, 181206. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21248Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (2005). Achieving relational authenticity in leadership: Does gender matter? Leadership Quarterly, 16, 459474. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.007Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the Labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573598. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. M. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(3), 474493. doi:10.5465/amle.2010.0046Google Scholar
Ely, R. & Padavic, I. (2007). A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences. Academy of Management Review, 32, 11211143. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26585842Google Scholar
Emrich, C. G., Denmark, F. L., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2004). Cross-cultural differences in gender egalitarianism: Implications for societies, organizations and leaders. In House, R. J., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. V. (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: A 62 nation GLOBE study (pp. 343394). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Erez, M., and Gati, E. (2004). A dynamic, multi-level model of culture: From the micro-level of the individual to the macro-level of a global culture. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 583598. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00190.xGoogle Scholar
Fine, M. G. (2003). Building successful multicultural organizations: Challenges and opportunities. In Ely, R. J., Foldy, E. G., & Scully, M. A. (Eds.), Reader in gender, work, and organization (pp. 308317). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. K. & Ely, R. J. (2003). Introducing gender: Overview. In Ely, R. J., Foldy, E. G., & Scully, M. A. (Eds.), Reader in gender, work, and organization (pp. 39). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1993). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Gerstner, C. R. & Day, D. V. (1994). Cross-cultural comparison of leadership prototypes. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 121134. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(94)90024-8Google Scholar
GLOBE Project (n.d.). Visual results of the 2004 culture and leadership study. www.globeproject.comGoogle Scholar
Halpern, D. F., & Cheung, F. M. (2008). Women at the top: Powerful leaders tell us how to combine work and family. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781444305210Google Scholar
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113135. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003Google Scholar
Higgins, M. C., & Kram, K. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 264288. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4378023Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in contextOnline Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1014Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184200. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1Google Scholar
House, R., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37, 310. doi:10.1016/S1090–9516(01)00069-4Google Scholar
House, R. J. Javidan, M., Hanges, P., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Htun, M., & Weldon, S. (2010). When do governments promote women’s rights? A framework for the comparative analysis of sex equality policy. Perspectives on Politics, 8, 207216. doi:10.1017/S1537592709992787Google Scholar
Ibarra, H., Ely, R., & Kolb, D. (2013). Women rising: The unseen barriers. Harvard Business Review, 91(9), 6066. hbr.org/2013/09/women-rising-the-unseen-barriersGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S., & Reichard, R. J. (2008). The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 3960. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. K., Putter, S., Reichard, R. J., Hoffmeister, K., Cigularov, K. P., Gibbons, A. M., Chen, P. Y., & Rosecrance, J. C. (2018). Mastery goal orientation and performance affect the development of leader efficacy during leader development. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(1), 3046. doi:10.1177/1548051817713689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, D., Fletcher, J. K., Meyerson, D. E., Merrill-Sands, D., & Ely, R. J. (2003). Making change: A framework for promoting gender equity in organizations. In Ely, R. J., Foldy, E. G., & Scully, M. A. (Eds.), Reader in gender, work, and organization (pp. 1015). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lord, R. G., Day, D. V., Zaccaro, S. J., Avolio, B. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2017). Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 434451. doi:10.1037/apl0000089Google Scholar
Lord, R. G., & Hall, R. J. (2005). Identity, deep structure and the development of leadership skills. Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), 591615. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerson, D. E., & Fletcher, J. K. (2003). A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling. In Ely, R. J., Foldy, E. G., & Scully, M. A. (Eds.), Reader in gender, work, and organization (pp. 230241). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Morawski, J. G., & St. Martin, J. (2011). The evolving vocabulary of the social sciences: The case of “socialization.History of Psychology, 14, 125. doi:10.1037/a0021984CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Offermann, L. R., & Hellmann, P. S. (1997). Culture’s consequences for leadership behavior: National values in action. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,28, 342351. doi:10.1177/0022022197283008Google Scholar
Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on board and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 15461571. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0319Google Scholar
Reichard, R. J., & Johnson, S. K. (2011). Leader self-development as organizational strategy. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 3342. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., Lituchy, T., & Liu, J. (1996). Think manager–think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 3341. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199601)17:1<33::AID-JOB778>3.0.CO;2-FGoogle Scholar
Schwab, K., Samans, R., Zahidi, S., Leopold, T. A., Ratcheva, V., Hausmann, R., & Tyson, L. D. (2017). The global gender gap report 2017. Geneva: World Economic Forum. www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-gender-gap-report-2017/Google Scholar
Schyns, B., & Meindl, J. R. (2005). An overview of implicit leadership theories and their application in organization practice. In Schyns, B. & Meindl, J. R. (Eds.), Implicit leadership theories: Essays and explorations (pp. 1536). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
Shaiq, H. M. A., Khalid, H. M. S., Akram, A., & Ali, B. (2011). Why not everybody loves Hofstede? What are the alternative approaches to study of culture? European Journal of Business and Management, 3, 101111. www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/EJBM/article/view/539Google Scholar
Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., & Schwartz, S. H. (2002). Cultural values, sources of guidance, and their relevance to managerial behavior a 47-nation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 188208. doi:10.1177/0022022102033002005Google Scholar
Sturm, S. (2001). Second generation employment discrimination: A structural approach. Columbia Law Review, 101 (3), 458568. doi:10.2307/1123737Google Scholar
Terjesen, S., Aguilera, R. V., & Lorenz, R. (2015). Legislating a woman’s seat on the board: Institutional factors driving gender quotas for boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 233251. doi:10.1007/s10551–014-2083-1Google Scholar
Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299317. doi:10.1007/s10551–011-0815-zGoogle Scholar
Torgrimson, B. N., & Minson, C. T. (2005). Sex and gender: What is the difference? Journal of Applied Physiology, 99(3), 785787. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00376.2005Google Scholar
van Dijk, H., van Engen, M. L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2012). Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119, 3853. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.003Google Scholar
Woetzel, J., Madgavkar, A., Ellingrud, K., Labile, E., Devillard, S., Kutcher, E., Manyika, J., Dobbs, R., & Krishnan, M. (2015). The power of parity: How advancing women’s equality can add $12 trillion to global growth. McKinsey Global Institute. www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/how-advancing-womens-equality-can-add-12-trillion-to-global-growthGoogle Scholar
World Bank. (2013). Gender at work, a companion to the 2013 world development report on jobs. www.worldbank.org/en/topic/gender/publication/gender-at-work-companion-report-to-world-development-report-2013-jobsGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G. (2008). How leaders influence organizational effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 708722. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.09.008Google Scholar
Zheng, W., Kark, R., & Meister, A.L. (2018). Paradox versus dilemma mindset: A theory of how women leaders navigate the tensions between agency and communion. Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 584596. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.04.001Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×