Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T10:28:35.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The Place of Field Studies in Environmental Science

from Part I - Getting Curious About Nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2020

Tim Burt
Affiliation:
Durham University
Des Thompson
Affiliation:
Scottish Natural Heritage
Get access

Summary

Modern environmental science has grown out of natural history. Natural history is as old as the interest of humans in the world around them – indeed, it must have been of overriding importance to the earliest humans, and for most since, whose very survival depended on a close and reasonably accurate knowledge of the resources and hazards of the natural environment around them. This is, of course, the case for any animal: that knowledge derives directly from what is seen and experienced in the field. Field observation has always been and remains the signal feature of natural history.

Type
Chapter
Information
Curious about Nature
A Passion for Fieldwork
, pp. 47 - 65
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, P. W. (1972). More is different. Science 177, 393396; DOI: 10.1126/science.177.4047.393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, T. P. and McDonnell, J. J. (2015). Whither field hydrology? The need for discovery science and outrageous hydrological hypotheses. Water Resources Research 51, 59195928; DOI: 10.1002/2014WR016839.Google Scholar
Carslaw, K. S., Lee, L. A., Regayre, L. A. and Johnson, J. S. (2018). Climate models are uncertain, but we can do something about it. Eos 99, 1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delibes-Mateos, A. M. and Ferreira, C. C. (2018). Are fieldwork studies being relegated to second place in conservation science? Global Ecology and Conservation 14, doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00389.Google Scholar
Etheridge, K. (2011). Maria Sibylla Meriam and the metamorphosis of natural history. Endeavour 35, 1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudie, A. (2008). Wheels across the Desert. London, Silphium Books.Google Scholar
Guerrini, C. J., Majumder, M. A., Lewellyn, M. J. and McGuire, A. L. (2018). Citizen science, public policy. Science 361, 134136; DOI: 10.1126/science.aar8379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irwin, A. (2018). Citizen science comes of age. Nature 562, 480482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampf, S., Strobl, B., Hammond, J., et al. (2018). Testing the waters: mobile apps for crowdsourced streamflow data. Eos 99, 3134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, E. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 20, 130141.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstern, J. B., Sisson, T. W. and Hurwitz, S. (2018). Probing magma reservoirs to improve volcano forecasts. Eos 99, 1621.Google Scholar
Nature, (2015). Rise of the citizen scientist (Editorial). Nature 524, 265; DOI: 10.1038/524265a.Google Scholar
Oschlies, A., Brandt, P., Stramma, L. and Schmidtko, S. (2018). Drivers and mechanisms of ocean deoxygenation. Nature Geoscience 11, 467473; DOI: 10.1038/s41561-018-0152-2.Google Scholar
Rennie, C. D., Church, M. and Venditti, J. G. (2018). Rock control of river geometry: the Fraser canyons. Journal of Geophysical Research – Earth Surface 123, 1860–1878; DOI: 10.1029/2017JF004494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiklomanov, A. I., Lammers, R. B. and Vorosmarty, C. J. (2002). Widespread decline in hydrological monitoring threatens Pan-Arctic research. Eos 83, 1317; DOI: 10.1029/2002EO000007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1963). Historical science. In The Fabric of Geology, ed. Albritton, C. C.. Addison-Wesley, New York, NY, pp. 24-48.Google Scholar
Vogel, G. (2017). Where have all the insects gone? Science 356, 576579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, N. D., Sawakuchi, H. O. and Richy, J. E. (2018). The Amazon River’s ecosystem where land meets the sea. Eos 99, 2933.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×