Betts, A. (2009). Forced Migration and Global Politics, 1st edn, Chichester, U.K.; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brigg, G. R., Jickells, T. D., Liss, P. S., and Osborn, T. J. (2003). The role of the oceans in climate. International Journal of Climatology, 23(10), 1127–59. Available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.926/pdfGoogle Scholar

Barnett, J. and Campbell, J. (2010). Climate Change and Small Island States: Power, Knowledge, and the South Pacific. [online]. London; Washington, DC: Earthscan. Available at https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00006a&AN=melb.b3525449&site=eds-live&scope=siteGoogle Scholar

Blome, K., Fischer-Lescano, A., Franzki, H., Markard, N., and Oeter, S. eds. (2016). Contested Regime Collisions: Norm Fragmentation in World Society [online]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Available at www.cambridge.org/core/books/contested-regime-collisions/BF1B4A812026925B08D69E2659342E0A.Google Scholar

Carlarne, C. (2010). Climate change, cultural heritage & the oceans: Rethinking regulatory approaches to climate change. Southeastern Environmental Law Journal, 17(2), 272.Google Scholar

Chen, Z. and Liu, Y. (2017). Granting reassurance while posing challenge: Explaining China’s creation of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Global Economic Governance Working Paper No. 130.Google Scholar

Dunoff, J. L. (2016). How to avoid regime collisions. In: Blome, K., Fischer-Lescano, A., Franzki, H., Markard, N., and Oeter, S., eds., Contested Regime Collisions: Norm Fragmentation in World Society. [online]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Available at https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00006a&AN=melb.b6163395&site=eds-live&scope=siteGoogle Scholar

Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Follesdal, A. (2016). Implications of contested multilateralism for global constitutionalism. Global Constitutionalism, 5(3), 297–308.Google Scholar

Hale, T. (2017). Climate Change: From Gridlock to Catalyst. In T. Hale and D. Held, eds., Beyond Gridlock. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hale, T., Held, D., and Young, K. (2013). Gridlock: Why Global Cooperation Is Failing When We Need It Most. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hannam, P. M. (2016). Contesting Authority. China and the New Landscape of Power Sector Governance in the Developing World. PhD thesis. [online]. Princeton University. Available at https://media.proquest.com/media/pq/classic/doc/4265622701/fmt/ai/rep/NPDF?_s=OcKkwi5OYJeUDGeKwvaToCUtnxw%3DGoogle Scholar

Harrison, J. (2017). Saving the Oceans through Law: The International Legal Framework for the Protection of the Marine Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Henson, S. A., Beaulieu, C., Ilyina, T., et al. (2017). Rapid emergence of climate change in environmental drivers of marine ecosystems. Nature Communications, 8, 1–9.Google Scholar

IISD. (2017). Summary of the Ocean Conference: June 5–9, 2017. New York, IISD.Google Scholar

Joyner, C. (2005). International Law in the 21st Century: Rules for Global Governance. New York, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar

Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. (2011). Power and Interdependence [online]. Longman. Available at https://books.google.com.au/books?id=kt3QtgAACAAJGoogle Scholar

Keohane, R. O. and Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23.Google Scholar

Keohane, R. O. and Victor, D. G. (2016). Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 570–75. Available at www.nature.com/natureclimatechangeGoogle Scholar

Kim, R. E. (2012). Is a new multilateral environmental agreement on ocean acidification necessary? Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 21(3), 243–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, R. E. (2013). The emergent network structure of the multilateral environmental agreement system. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 980–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraska, J. (2012). Using UNCLOS as a force multiplier for American power. Opinio Juris. Available at http://opiniojuris.org/2012/06/14/using-unclos-as-a-force-multiplier-for-americanpower/.Google Scholar

Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 36(2), 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mbeva, K. and Pauw, P. (2016). Self-differentiation of countries’ responsibilities. Addressing climate change through intended nationally determined contributions [online]. German Development Institute. Bonn, Germany: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE). Discussion Paper No. 4/2016. Available at www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/DP_4.2016.pdf.Google Scholar

Mendelsohn, R., Emanuel, K., Chonabayashi, S., and Bakkensen, L. (2012). The impact of climate change on global tropical cyclone damage. Nature Climate Change, 2(3), 205–9.Google Scholar

Morse, J. C. and Keohane, R. O. (2014). Contested multilateralism. The Review of International Organizations, 9(4), 385–412.Google Scholar

Motaal, D. A. (2010). The shift from “low politics” to “high politics” – Climate change. Environmental Policy and Law, 40(2–3), 98–109.Google Scholar

Oberthür, S. and Gehring, T. (2006). Institutional interaction in global environmental governance: synergy and conflict among international and EU policies. [online]. Cambridge, Mass.; London: MIT, 2006.Google Scholar

Oberthür, S. and Stokke, O. S. eds. (2011). Institutional interaction in global environmental change. In Managing Institutional Complexity. [Electronic Resource]: Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change. [online]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Available at https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00006a&AN=melb.b5784766&site=eds-live&scope=siteCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ovodenko, A. (2014). The global climate regime: Explaining lagging reform. Review of Policy Research, 31(3), 173–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ovodenko, A. (2017). Regulating the Polluters Markets and Strategies for Protecting the Global Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rayfuse, R. (2010). The anthropocene, autopoiesis and the disingenuousness of the genuine link: Addressing enforcement gaps in the legal regime for areas beyond national jurisdiction. In Elferink, A. G. and Molenaar, E. J., eds. The Legal Regime of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction: Current Principles and Frameworks and Future Directions. Leiden; Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 165–90.Google Scholar

Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–74.Google Scholar

UN. (2017a). Our Ocean, Our Future Call for Action. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

UN. (2017b). Report of the Preparatory Committee Established by General Assembly Resolution 69/292: Development of an International Legally Binding Instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. (2015). Resolution 69/292. A/RES/69/292. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

UN Security Council. (2004). Resolution 1540. S/RES/1540. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

Vogler, J. (2015). Climate Change in World Politics. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar

Adger, N. W., Arnell, N. W., and Tompkins, E. L. (2005). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 77–86.Google Scholar

Adger, N. W., Brown, K., Nelson, D. R., et al. (2011). Resilience implications of policy responses to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change, 2(5), 757–66.Google Scholar

Agardy, T. (2005). Global marine conservation policy versus site-level implementation: The mismatch of scale and its implications. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 300, 242–48.Google Scholar

Agrawal, A. (2003). Sustainable governance of common pool resources: Context, methods, and politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32(1), 243–62.Google Scholar

Alger, J. and Dauvergne, P. (2017). The global norm of large marine protected areas: Explaining variable adoption and implementation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(4), 298–310.Google Scholar

Bergsma, E., Gupta, J., and Jong, P. (2012). Does individual responsibility increase the adaptive capacity of society? The case of local water management in the Netherlands. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 64, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brosius, J. P. and Russell, D. (2003). Conservation from above: An anthropological perspective on transboundary protected areas and ecoregional planning. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 17(1), 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke, L., Reytar, K., Spalding, M., and Perry, A. (2011). Reefs at Risk Revisited. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, p. 114.Google Scholar

Clement, F. (2010). Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: Proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Sciences, 43(2), 129–56.Google Scholar

Clement, F. (2012). For critical social-ecological system studies: Integrating power and discourses to move beyond the right institutional fit. Environmental Conservation, 40(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clifton, J. (2009). Science, funding and participation: Key issues for marine protected area networks and the Coral Triangle Initiative. Environmental Conservation, 36(2), 1–6.Google Scholar

Clifton, J. and Foale, S. (2017). Extracting ideology from policy: Analysing the social construction of conservation priorities in the Coral Triangle region. Marine Policy, 82, 189–96.Google Scholar

CTI Secretariat. (2009). Regional Plan of Action. Jakarta: Interim Regional CTI Secretariat. p. 87.Google Scholar

Eaking, H. and Lemos, M. C. (2006). Adaptation and the state: Latin America and the challenge of capacity-building under globalization. Global Environmental Change, 16(1), 7–18.Google Scholar

Engle, N. L. (2011). Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 647–56.Google Scholar

Engle, N. L. and Lemos, M. C. (2010). Unpacking governance: Building adaptive capacity to climate change of river basins in Brazil. Global Environmental Change, 20(1), 4–13.Google Scholar

Fidelman, P. and Ekstrom, J. A. (2012). Mapping seascapes of international environmental arrangements in the Coral Triangle. Marine Policy, 36(5), 993–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fidelman, P., Evans, L., Fabinyi, M., et al. (2012). Governing large-scale marine commons: Contextual challenges in the Coral Triangle. Marine Policy, 36(1), 42–53. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.03.007Google Scholar

Fidelman, P., Evans, L., Foale, S., et al. (2014). Coalition cohesion for regional marine governance: A stakeholder analysis of the Coral Triangle Initiative. Ocean and Coastal Management, 95, 117–128.Google Scholar

Fidelman, P., Leitch, A., and Nelson, D. R. (2013). Unpacking multilevel adaptation in the Great Barrier Reef. Global Environmental Change, 23(4), 800–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fidelman, P., Truong Van, T., Nong, K., and Nursey-Bray, M. (2017). The institutions-adaptive capacity nexus: Insights from coastal resources co-management in Cambodia and Vietnam. Environmental Science and Policy, 76, 103–12.Google Scholar

Foale, S. J. (2001). ‘Where’s our development?’ Landowner aspirations and environmentalist agendas in Western Solomon Islands. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 2(2), 44–66.Google Scholar

Foale, S., Adhuri, D., Alino, P., et al. (2013). Food security and the Coral Triangle Initiative. Marine Policy, 38, 174–83.Google Scholar

Grecksch, K. (2014). Adaptive capacity and regional water governance in north-western Germany. Water Policy, 15(5), 794–815.Google Scholar

Grothmann, T., Grecksch, K., Winges, M., and Siebenhuner, B. (2013). Assessing institutional capacities to adapt to climate change: Integrating psychological dimensions in the Adaptive Capacity Wheel. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(12), 3369–84.Google Scholar

Gupta, J., Bergsma, E., Termeer, C., et al. (2016). The adaptive capacity of institutions in the spatial planning, water, agriculture and nature sectors in the Netherlands. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Climate Change, 21(6), 883–903. doi: 10.1007/s11027-014-9630-zGoogle Scholar

Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J., et al. (2010). The Adaptive Capacity Wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science and Policy, 13(6), 459–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Hoegh-Guldberg, H., Veron, J. E. N., et al. (2009). The Coral Triangle and Climate Change: Ecosystems, People and Societies at Risk. Brisbane: World Wild Fund Australia.Google Scholar

Kashwan, P. (2016). Integrating power in institutional analysis: A micro-foundation perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 28(1), 5–26.Google Scholar

Leaders Declaration. Coral Triangle Initiative Leaders’ Declaration on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security. Signed May 15, 2009, Manado.Google Scholar

McLeod, E., Moffitt, R., Timmermann, A., et al. (2010). Warming seas in the Coral Triangle: Coral reef vulnerability and management implications. Coastal Management, 38(5), 518–39.Google Scholar

Munaretto, S. and Klostermann, J. (2011). Assessing adaptive capacity of institutions to climate change: A comparative case study of the Dutch Wadden Sea and the Venice Lagoon. Climate Law, 2(2), 219–50.Google Scholar

Nelson, D. R., Adger, N. W., and Brown, K. (2007). Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 395–419.Google Scholar

Nightingale, A. (2017). Power and politics in climate change adaptation efforts: Struggles over authority and recognition in the context of political instability. Geoforum, 84, 11–20.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. and Crawford, S. (2005). Classifying rules. In Ostrom, E., ed., Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 187–215.Google Scholar

Pajaro, M. G., Mulrennan, M. E., and Vincent, A. C. J. (2010). Toward an integrated marine protected areas policy: Connecting the global to the local. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 12(6), 945–65.Google Scholar

Rodríguez, J. P., Taber, A. B., Daszak, P., et al. (2007). Globalization of conservation: A view from the south. Science, 317(5839), 755–56.Google Scholar

Rosen, F. and Olsson, P. (2013). Institutional entrepreneurs, global networks, and the emergence of international institutions for ecosystem-based management: The Coral Triangle Initiative. Marine Policy, 38, 195–204.Google Scholar

Smit, B. and Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 282–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Termeer, C., Biesbroek, R., and Van Den Brink, M. (2011). Institutions for adaptation to climate change: Comparing national adaptation strategies in Europe. European Political Science, 1, 1–13.Google Scholar

The WorldFish Centre/USAID. (2010). The US Coral Triangle Initiative (CTI) Support Program: Midterm Program Performance Evaluation Report. Penang: The WorldFish Center (WorldFish) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), p. 54.Google Scholar

Van den Brink, M., Meijerink, S., Termeer, C., and Gupta, J. (2014). Climate-proof planning for flood-prone areas: Assessing adaptive capacity of planning institutions in the Netherlands. Regional Environmental Change, 14(3), 981–95.Google Scholar

Van den Brink, M., Termeer, C., and Meijerink, S. (2011). Are Dutch water safety institutions prepared for climate change? Journal of Water and Climate Change, 2(4), 272–87.Google Scholar

Von Heland, F., Crona, B., and Fidelman, P. (2014). Mediating science and action across multiple boundaries in the Coral Triangle. Global Environmental Change, 29, 53–64.Google Scholar

Young, O. R. (2002). The Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay and Scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Young, O. R. (2005). Science Plan – Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Bonn: International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, p. 15.Google Scholar

American Law Institute. (1959). Restatement (2d) of Trusts § 399.Google Scholar

American Law Institute. (1987). Restatement (Third) of The Foreign Relations Law of the United States.Google Scholar

American Law Institute. (2003). Restatement (Third) of Trusts § 67.Google Scholar

American Law Institute. (2008). Restatement (Third) of Trusts § 2.Google Scholar

Anderson, T. L. and Leal, D. R. (2001). Free Market Environmentalism, rev. edn., New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archer, J. H., Connors, D. L., Laurence, K., and Bowen, R. (1994). The Public Trust Doctrine and the Management of America’s Coasts, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, R. (2009). Property Rights and Natural Resources, Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Beatty v. Guggenheim Expl. Co. (1919). 225 N.Y. 380, 386.Google Scholar

Brilmayer, L. and Klein, N. (2001). Land and sea: Two sovereignty regimes in search of a common denominator. NYU Journal of International Law & Policy, 33, 703–68.Google Scholar

Burkett, M. (2011). The nation ex-situ: On climate change, deterritorialized nationhood and the post-climate era. Climate Law, 2, 345–74.Google Scholar

Cambou, D. and Smis, S. (2013). Permanent sovereignty over natural resources from a human rights perspective: Natural resources exploitation and indigenous peoples’ rights in the Arctic. Michigan State International Law Review, 22(1), 347–76.Google Scholar

Chasin, C. J. (2015). Modernizing class action Cy Pres through democratic inputs: A return to Cy Pres Comme possible. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 163, 1463–95.Google Scholar

Churchill, A. and Lowe, A. V. (1999). The Law of the Sea, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Costi, A. and Ross, N. J. (2017). The ongoing legal status of low-lying states in the climate change future. In Butler, P. and Morris, C., eds., Small States in a Legal World. Vol. I. Cham: Springer, pp. 101–38.Google Scholar

Crawford, J. R. (2006). The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Crawford, J. R. (2007). The Creation of States in International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ctr. for Biological Diversity, Inc. v. FPL Group, Inc. (2008). 83 Cal. Rptr. 3d 588, 599.Google Scholar

Dupuy, R. J. and Vignes, D. (1991). Handbook on the New Law of the Sea. Vol. I. Leiden; Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Fisch, E. L. (1952). Cy Pres doctrine and changing philosophies. Michigan Law Review, 51, 375–88.Google Scholar

Frey, B. C. (1974). The public trust in public waterways. Urban Law Annual, 7, 219–46.Google Scholar

Frey, B. C. and Mutz, A. (2007). The public trust in surface waterways and submerged lands of the Great Lakes states. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 40(4), 907–94.Google Scholar

Friedheim, R. L. (1993). Negotiating the New Ocean Regime, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Head, J. W. (2017). International Law and Agroecological Husbandry: Building Legal Foundations for a New Agriculture, London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hebrew Univ. of Jerusalem v. Gen. Motors LLC. (2012). 903 F. Supp. 2d 932, 936.Google Scholar

Hughes v. Oklahoma. (1979). 441 U.S. 322.Google Scholar

In re Estate of Lamb. (1971). 97 Cal. Rptr. 46, 49.Google Scholar

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group II. (2014). Fifth Assessment Report, Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Part B Regional Aspects.Google Scholar

International Court of Justice Western Sahara Advisory Opinion. (1975). ICJ GL No61, [1975] ICJ Rep 12.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. (1994). National self-determination today: Problems of legal theory and practice. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 43(2), 241–69.Google Scholar

Krueger, R. B. (1968). The convention of the continental shelf and the need for its revision and some comments regarding the regime for the lands beyond. Natural Resources Lawyer, 1(3), 1–18.Google Scholar

Leary, D. K. (2007). International Law and the Genetic Resources of the Deep Sea, Leiden; Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council. (1992). 505 U.S. 1003, 1044.Google Scholar

McAdam, J. (2010). Disappearing states, statelessness and the boundaries of international law. In McAdam, J., ed., Climate Change and Displacement: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 105–28.Google Scholar

McIntyre, O. (2007). Environmental Protection of International Watercourses Under International Law, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar

McVay, K. (2012). Self-determination in new contexts: The self-determination of refugees and forced migrants in international law. Utrecht Journal of European and International Law, 28(75), 36–52.Google Scholar

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States. (1933). 165 L.N.T.S. 19.Google Scholar

Ohlin, J. D. (2016). The right to exist and the right to resist. In Tesón, F. R., ed., The Theory of Self-Determination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osherenko, G. (2006). New discourses on ocean governance: Understanding property rights and the public trust. Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation, 21(2), 317–82.Google Scholar

Pound, R. (1920). The progress of the law, 1918–1919: Equity. Harvard Law Review, 33(3), 420–41.Google Scholar

Raic, D. (2002). Statehood and the Law of Self-Determination, The Hague; London; New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Rayfuse, R. R. (2009). W(h)ither Tuvalu? International law and disappearing states. UNSW Law Research Paper No. 2009-9, 1–13.Google Scholar

Rayfuse, R. R. (2010). International law and disappearing states: Utilising maritime entitlements to overcome the statehood dilemma. UNSW Law Research Paper No. 2010-52, 1–13.Google Scholar

Reliable Life Insurance v. Ingle et al. (2009). CanLII 28225.Google Scholar

Saluka Investment BV (The Netherlands) v. The Czech Republic. (2006). ICGJ 368 (PCA).Google Scholar

Sand, P. H. (2004). Sovereignty bounded: Public trusteeship for common pool resources? Global Environmental Policy, 4(1) 47–71.Google Scholar

Sax, J. L. (1969). The public trust doctrine in natural resource law: Effective judicial intervention. Michigan Law Review, 68, 471–566.Google Scholar

Shaw, M. N. (2014). International Law, 7th edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shearer, I. (2013). The limits of maritime jurisdiction. In Schofield, C. H., Lee, S., and Kwon, M., eds., The Limits of Maritime Jurisdiction. Leiden; Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 51–64.Google Scholar

Sofroniou, A. (2017). International Law, Global Relations, World Powers, Andreas Sofroniou.Google Scholar

Stoutenburg, J. G. (2013). When do states disappear? In Gerrard, M. B. and Wannier, G. E., eds., Threatened Island Nations: Legal Implications of Rising Seas and a Changing Climate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–88.Google Scholar

Sullivan, W. P. (2017). The restricted charitable gift as third-party-beneficiary contract. Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Journal, 52, 79–119.Google Scholar

Summers, J. (2014). Peoples and International Law, 2nd rev. edn., Leiden; Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

The Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties. (1946). 17 ILM 1488 (1978).Google Scholar

Turnipseed, M., Berkman, J., Blumm, M., et al. (2012). The public trust doctrine and Rio+20. Third Nobel Laureate Symposium on Global Sustainability, 1–7.Google Scholar

Turnipseed, M., Roady, S. E., Sagarin, R., and Crowder, L. B. (2009). The silver anniversary of the United States’ exclusive economic zone: Twenty-five years of ocean use and abuse, and the possibility of a blue water public trust doctrine. Ecology Law Quarterly, 36, 1–70.Google Scholar

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. (1982). 1833 U.N.T.S. 397.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly. (1963). Resolution 1803 Permanent sovereignty over natural resources. U.N. Doc. A/RES/1803.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly. (1973). Resolution 3016 Permanent Sovereignty Over Natural Resources of Developing Countries. U.N. Doc. A/RES/3016.Google Scholar

United States v. State of Texas. (1950). 339 U.S. 707.Google Scholar

United States v. Mexico. (1942). US Dept. of State, Publication 2859, Arbitration Series 9, 546.Google Scholar

Wilkins, J. G. and Wascom, M. (1992). The public trust doctrine in Louisiana. Louisiana Law Review, 52(4), 861–905.Google Scholar

Wood, M. C. (2014). Nature’s Trust: Environmental Law for a New Ecological Age, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Yzenbaard, C. A., Hess, A. M., Bogert, G. G., et al. (2017). Bogert’s Trusts and Trustees, dig. ed., St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing.Google Scholar

Breithaupt, J. L., Smoak, J. M., Smith, T. J., Sanders, C. J., and Hoare, A. (2012). Organic carbon burial rates in mangrove sediments: Strengthening the global budget. Global Biochemical Cycles, 26(3). Available at onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2012GB004375/full.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cabrera, J., Phillips, F. K., and Perron-Welch, F. (2014). Biodiversity Legislation Study: A Review of Biodiversity Legislation in 8 Countries. Hamburg, Germany: World Future Council. Available at www.worldfuturecouncil.org/fileadmin/user_upload/PDF/Final_Biodiversity_Legislation_Study.pdf.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay. Argentina v. Uruguay, 2010 ICJ Reports 14. Available at www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/135/15877.pdf.Google Scholar

China. (2014). Environmental Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China, Chinadialogue, April 24, 2014. Available at www.chinadialogue.net/Environmental-Protection-Law-2014-eversion.pdf.Google Scholar

China. (2016). Opinions of the General Office of the State Council on Improving the Compensation Mechanism for Ecological Protection (April 28, 2016), State Council Issue No 31. Available at www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-05/13/content_5073049.htm.Google Scholar

Chmura, G. L. (2014). What do we need to assess the sustainability of the tidal salt marsh carbon sink? Ocean and Coastal Management, 83, 25–31. Available at sites.duke.edu/bluecarbonmastersproject/files/2012/03/Chmura-2011-sequestration-.pdf.Google Scholar

Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992). June 5, 31 ILM 822 (entered into force December 29, 1993).Google Scholar

Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses. (1997). May 21, annexed to GA Res 51/229, UNTS 52106 (entered into force August 17, 2014).Google Scholar

Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes. (1992). March 17, 1936 UNTS 269 (entered into force October 6, 1996).Google Scholar

Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat. (1971). February 2, 1996 UNTS 245 (entered into force December 21, 1975).Google Scholar

Costa Rica. (2008). Ley N° 7788 del 30/04/1998 de Biodiversidad (modificada por última vez por la Ley N° 8686 del 21 de noviembre de2008). Available at www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/es/cr/cr082es.pdf.Google Scholar

Democratic Republic of Congo. (2002). Loi n° 011/2002 du 29 Aout 2002 portant code forestier. Available at siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTINSPECTIONPANEL/Resources/Annex16.pdf.Google Scholar

Democratic Republic of Congo. (2014). Décret n° 14/018 du 02 août 2014 fixant les modalités d'attribution des concessions forestières aux communautés locales. Available at faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/cng140362.pdf.Google Scholar

Duarte, C. M., Marbà, N., Gacia, E., et al. (2010). Seagrass community metabolism: Assessing the carbon sink capacity of seagrass meadows. Global Biochemical Cycles 24, GB4032. Available at digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/46309/1/SeagrassCommunity.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

FAO. (2016). Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems: Processes and Practices in the High Seas. FAO Technical Paper 595, Rome: FAO. Available at www.fao.org/3/a-i5952e.pdf.Google Scholar

Finland. (2004). Laki vesienhoidon ja merenhoidon järjestämisestä (30.12.2004/1299). Available at http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2004/20041299?search%5Btype%5D=pika&search%5Bpika%5D=30.12.2004%2F1299%20http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2017/20170094 http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2017/20170094.Google Scholar

Finland. (2010). Laki tulvariskien hallinnasta (24.6.2010/620). Available at www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2010/20100620.Google Scholar

Finland. (2015). Ilmastolaki (22.5.2015/609). Available at www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2015/20150609?search%5Btype%5D=pikaandsearch%5Bpika%5D=82%2F2014#P.Google Scholar

Freestone, D. and Phillips, F. (2017). The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOSC) and Sustainable Development Jurisprudence. In Segger, Marie Claire Cordonier and Weeramantry, C. G. eds., Sustainable Development in International Courts and Tribunals. London: Routledge, 319–38.Google Scholar

Granit, J., Lymer, B. L., Olsen, S., et al. (2017). A conceptual framework for governing and managing key flows in a source-to-sea continuum. Water Policy Uncorrected Proof, 1–19. Available at wp.iwaponline.com/content/ppiwawaterpol/early/2017/04/19/wp.2017.126.full.pdf.Google Scholar

Herr, D. and Landis, E. (2016). Coastal Blue Carbon Ecosystems: Opportunities for Nationally Determined Contributions. Policy Brief, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar

IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report Summary for Policy Makers. Available at www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf.Google Scholar

Koutouki, K. and Phillips, F. (2016). SDG 14 on Ensuring Conservation and Sustainable Use of Oceans and Marine Resources. Issue Brief, Montreal, CISDL/UNEP. Available at http://www.cisdl.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/SDG_14_Marine_Resources_-_Issue_Brief_-__07.09.2016_-__Final_UNEP-1-1.pdf.Google Scholar

Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1997). December 11, 2303 UNTS 148, 37 ILM 22 (entered into force February 16, 2005).Google Scholar

Laffoley, D. and Grimsditch, G., eds. (2009). The Management of Natural Coastal Carbon Sinks, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Available at cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/carbon_managment_report_final_printed_version_1.pdf.Google Scholar

Lavery, P. S., Mateo, M. Á., Serrano, O., and Rozaimi, M. (2013). Variability in the carbon storage of seagrass habitats and its implications for global estimates of blue carbon ecosystem service. PLoS One 8, e73748. Available at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0073748.Google Scholar

Livelihoods Fund. Senegal: The Largest Mangrove Restoration Programme in the World. Available at: www.livelihoods.eu/projects/oceanium-senegal/Google Scholar

Martin, A., Landis, E., Bryson, C., et al. (2016). Nationally Determined Contributions Inventory. Appendix to: Coastal Blue Carbon Ecosystems. Opportunities for Nationally Determined Contributions. Arendal, Norway: GRID. Available at bluecsolutions.org/dev/wp-content/uploads/Blue-Carbon-NDC-Appendix.pdf.Google Scholar

Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2010). October 29, UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/1, UNTS No 30619 (entered into force October 12, 2014).Google Scholar

Nellemann, C., Corcoran, E., Duarte, C. M., et al. (2009). Blue Carbon: A Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme GRID-Arendal. Available at gridarendal-website.s3.amazonaws.com/production/documents/:s_document/83/original/BlueCarbon_screen.pdf?1483646492.Google Scholar

Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2015). December 12, Decision CP.21, FCCC/CP/2015/L.9, UNTS No. 54113 (entered into force November 4, 2016).Google Scholar

Phillips, F. K. (2016a). Intellectual property rights in traditional knowledge: Enabler of sustainable development. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 32(83), 1–18.Google Scholar

Phillips, F. K. (2016b). Sustainable bio-based supply chains in light of the Nagoya Protocol. In Bals, L. and Tate, W.., eds., Implementing Triple Bottom Line Sustainability into Global Supply Chains. London: Greenleaf Publishing, pp. 294–316.Google Scholar

Phillips, F. K. and Maciunas, S. (2017). How a fight over South China islands led to climate win. CIGI Commentary. Available at www.cigionline.org/articles/how-fight-over-south-china-islands-led-climate-win.Google Scholar

Phillips, F. K., Miles, C. A., Khalfran, A., and Reynal, M. L. (2016). SDG 6 on Ensuring Water and Sanitation for All: Contributions of International Law, Policy and Governance. Issue Brief, Montreal: CISDL/UNEP. Available at http://www.cisdl.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/SDG_6_Water_-_Issue_Brief_-_06.09.2016_-_Final_-_UNEP-1.pdf.Google Scholar

Ramsar Convention. (1993). COP Resolution V.4: The record of Ramsar sites where changes in ecological character have occurred, are occurring, or are likely to occur ("Montreux Record). COP V, June 9–16, 1993. Available at www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/res/key_res_5.4e.pdf.Google Scholar

Ramsar Convention. (1996). COP Resolution VI.1: Working definitions of ecological character, guidelines for describing and maintaining the ecological character of listed sites, and guidelines for operation of the Montreux Record. COP VI, March 19–27, 1996. Available at www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/res/key_res_vi.01e.pdf.Google Scholar

Ramsar Convention. (2002). COP Resolution VIII.8: Assessing and reporting the status and trends of wetlands, and the implementation of Article 3.2 of the Convention. COP VIII, November 18–26, 2002. Available at www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/res/key_res_viii_08_e.pdf.Google Scholar

Ramsar Convention. (2015). Award for Innovation 2015: Oceanium. Available at www.ramsar.org/activities/award-for-innovation-2015.Google Scholar

Request for an Advisory Opinion Submitted by the Sub-regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC). Case No. 21, Advisory Opinion (ITLOS, April 2, 2015). Available at www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no.21/advisory_opinion/C21_AdvOp_02.04.pdf.Google Scholar

Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area. Case No. 17, Advisory Opinion (ITLOS Seabed Disputes Chamber Feb. 1, 2011), 50 ILM (2011). Available at www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_17/adv_op_010211.pdf.Google Scholar

Sands, P. (2016). Climate change and the rule of law: Adjudicating the future in international law. Journal of Environmental Law, 28, 19–35.Google Scholar

Segger, M. C. C. and Khalfan, A. (2004). Sustainable Development Law: Principles, Practices and Prospects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Segger, M. C. C. and Phillips, F. K. (2015). Indigenous traditional knowledge for sustainable development: The biodiversity convention and plant treaty regimes. Journal of Forest Research, 20(5), 430–7.Google Scholar

South Africa. (1998). National Environmental Management Act 1998 (Act No 107 of 1998), Government Gazette vol. 401, No 19519 (Cape Town, November 27). Available at www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/legislations/nema_amendment_act107.pdf.Google Scholar

South Africa. (2004). National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act 2004 (Act No.10 2004). Available at faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/saf45083.pdf.Google Scholar

South Africa. (2005). Act No.20 of 2005: Patents Amendment Act, 2005, Government Gazette Vol. 486, No. 28319 (December 9). Available at www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/za/za029en.pdf.Google Scholar

South Africa. (2008). National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act 2004 (Act No.10 2004) Regulations on Bioprospecting and Access and Benefit Sharing 2008. Available at www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=179663.Google Scholar

South Africa. (2008). National Environmental Management: Integrated Coastal Management Act 2008 (Act No 24 of 2008), Government Gazette vol. 167, No 40638. Available at www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/legislations/nemicma24of2008_reclamation_regulations.pdf.Google Scholar

South Africa. (2012). Bioprospecting, Access and Benefit-Sharing Regulatory Framework: Guidelines for Providers, Users and Regulators. Available at www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/legislations/bioprospecting_regulatory_framework_guideline.pdf.Google Scholar

South China Sea Arbitration. (2016). Philippines v China, Award, PCA Case No 2013–19, ICGJ 495 (PCA 2016), July 12, Permanent Court of Arbitration. Available at www.pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/2086.Google Scholar

TEEB. (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Local and Regional Policy Makers. Brussels: UNEP. Available at www.teebweb.org/media/2010/09/TEEB_D2_Local_Policy-Makers_Report-Eng.pdf.Google Scholar

UN. (1997). General Assembly Resolution 51/229: Convention on the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses A/RES/51/229 (July 8). Available at www.un.org/documents/ga/res/51/ares51-229.htm.Google Scholar

UN. (2012). Reference: C.N.639.2012.TREATIES-XXVII.5.b (depositary notification), amendments to Articles 25 and 26 (November 14). Available at treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/2012/CN.639.2012-Eng.pdf.Google Scholar

UN. (2015). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 19 July 2015, “Development of an international legally binding instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction” A/RES/69/292 (July 6). Available at documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/187/55/PDF/N1518755.pdf.Google Scholar

UN. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, UN Doc A/RES/70/1. Available at www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1andLang=E.Google Scholar

UN. (2017). Chair’s non-paper on elements of a draft text of an international legally-binding instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (February 28, 2017). Third Session of the Prep Com (March 27–April 7, 2017). Available at www.un.org/depts/los/biodiversity/prepcom_files/Chair_non_paper.pdf.Google Scholar

UN Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea. (2017). Report of the Preparatory Committee established by General Assembly resolution 69/292: Development of an international legally binding instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction. A/AC.287/2017/PC.4/2 (31 July 2017). Available at http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/AC.287/2017/PC.4/2.Google Scholar

UN Economic Commission for Europe. (2004). Meeting of the Parties to the Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes: Amendment to Articles 25 and 26 of the Convention, ECE/MP.WAT/14 (January 12). Available at unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/documents/2004/wat/ece.mp.wat.14.e.pdf.Google Scholar

UN Economic Commission for Europe. (2011). Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes: Second Assessment on Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes. Geneva: United Nations. Available at unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/water/publications/assessment/English/ECE_Second_Assessment_En.pdf.Google Scholar

UNEP. (1995). Global Program of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-Based Activities. 3 November 1995, UNEP(OCA)/LBA/IG.2/7 (December 5). Available at www.ucc.ie/research/crc/pages/projects/ICZM/documents/policy/international/GlobalPAMarine.pdf.Google Scholar

UNFCCC. NDC Registry (interim). Available at unfccc.int/focus/ndc_registry/items/9433.php.Google Scholar

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. (1982). December 10, 1833 UNTS 3, 21 ILM 1261 (entered into force November 16, 1994).Google Scholar

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1992). May 9, 31 ILM 849 (entered into force March 21, 1994).Google Scholar

UN Treaty Collection. (1976). Convention on wetlands of international importance especially as waterfowl habitat (Ramsar, February 2, 1971), February 17, No 14583. Available at treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20996/volume-996-I-14583-English.pdf.Google Scholar

UN Treaty Collection. (1996). Chapter XXVII Environment: Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes, (Helsinki, March 17, 1992), October 6, No.33207. Available at treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/MTDSG/Volume%20II/Chapter%20XXVII/XXVII-5.en.pdf.Google Scholar

UN Treaty Collection. (2014). Chapter XXVII Environment: Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses (New York, May 21, 1997), August 17, No. 52106. Available at treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/MTDSG/Volume%20II/Chapter%20XXVII/XXVII-12.en.pdf.Google Scholar

Broecker, W. (1975). Climate change: Are we on the brink of a pronounced global warming? Science, 189, 460–3.Google Scholar

Caron, D. (1990). When law makes climate change worse: Rethinking the law of baselines in light of a rising sea level. Ecology Law Quarterly, 17, 621–53.Google Scholar

Cheung, W. W., Sarmiento, J. L., Dunne, J., et al. (2013) Shrinking of fish exacerbates impacts of global ocean changes on marine ecosystems. Nature Climate Change, 3(3), 254–8.Google Scholar

Church, J. A., Clark, P. U., Cazenave, A., et al. (2013) Sea level change. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coral Triangle Initiative, Regional Plan of Action. (2009). Available at www.coraltriangleinitiative.org/library/cti-regional-plan-action.Google Scholar

EU Directorate General for Internal Policies. (2015). Fisheries Management and the Arctic in the Context of Climate Change. Available at www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/563380/IPOL_STU(2015)563380_EN.pdf.Google Scholar

Fairall, C. W., Bradley, E. F., Godfrey, , et al. (1996). The cool skin and the warm layer effects on sea surface temperatures. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101, 1295–1308.Google Scholar

Griffin, P. (2017). Carbon Majors Report 2017. Available at https://b8f65cb373b1b7b15feb-c70d8ead6ced550b4d987d7c03fcdd1d.ssl.cf3.rackcdn.com/cms/reports/documents/000/002/327/original/Carbon-Majors-Report-2017.pdf.Google Scholar

The Guardian. (2011). Which industries and activities emit the most carbon?, April 28. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/apr/28/industries-sectors-carbon-emissions.Google Scholar

ICAO (Convention on International Civil Aviation). (1944). 15 U.N.T.S. 295.Google Scholar

ILA (International Law Association). (2012). Report of the Seventh-Fifth Conference held in Sofia, Baselines under the International Law of the Sea: Committee Report.Google Scholar

ILA (International Law Association). (2016). International Law and Sea Level Rise Committee Report, Johannesburg Conference, August 7–11.Google Scholar

ILA (International Law Association). (2018). Resolution 5/2018 Committee on International Law and Sea Level Rise.Google Scholar

IPCC “A” (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), Porter, J. R., Xie, L, et al. (2014). Food security and food production systems. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available at www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg2/WGIIAR5-Chap7_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar

IPCC “B”, Kovats, R. S., Valentini, R., et al. (2014). Europe. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available at www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg2/WGIIAR5-Chap23_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar

Jesus, J. (2003). Rocks, new-born islands, sea level rise and maritime space. In Frowein, J. A., Scharioth, K., Winkelmann, I. and Wolfrum, R.., eds., Negotiating for Peace- Liber Amicorum Tono Eitel, Berlin: Springer, 529–42.Google Scholar

Lam, V. W., Cheung, W. W., and Sumaila, U. R. (2016) Marine capture fisheries in the Arctic: Winners or losers under climate change and ocean acidification? Fish and Fisheries, 17(2), 335–57.Google Scholar

Maratos, A. (2008). President of the Directing Committee of the International Hydrographic Bureau, “Nautical Charts and UNCLOS.” Available at www.hydro-international.com/content/article/nautical-charts-and-unclos.Google Scholar

McIlgorm, A., Hanna, S., Knapp, G., et al. (2010). How will climate change alter fishery governance?: Insights from seven international case studies. Marine Policy, 34(1), 170–7.Google Scholar

Mostyn v. Fabrigas 1 Cowp. 161, 98 Eng. Rep. 1021 (K.B. 1774) (Mansfield, L.J.).Google Scholar

Resolution LP.4(8) on the Amendment to the London Protocol to Regulate the Placement of Matter for Ocean Fertilization and other Marine Geoegineering Activities (adopted Oct. 18, 2013), IMO Doc. LC/35/15 Annex 4.Google Scholar

Revelle, R. and Suess, H. (1957). Carbon dioxide exchange between atmosphere and ocean and the question of an increase of atmospheric CO2 during the past decades, Tellus IX, 9(1), 18–27.Google Scholar

Segel, A., De Young, C., and Soto, D. (2016). Food and Agriculture Organization, Climate Change Implications for Fisheries and Aquaculture: Summary of the Findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report, FIAP CA1122. Available at www.fao.org/3/a-i5707e.pdf.Google Scholar

South China Sea Arbitration, Philippines v. China, Award, PCA Case No 2013-19, ICGJ 495 (PCA 2016), July 12, 2016.Google Scholar

UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea). (1982). 21 ILM 1261.Google Scholar

UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). (1992). 1771 UNTS 107.Google Scholar

Viljhalmsson, H. (2007). Impact of changes in natural conditions on ocean resources. In Nordquist, M., Long, R. J. and Heidar, T. H.., eds., Law, Science, and Ocean Management. The Netherlands: Brill Publishers, pp. 225–70.Google Scholar

Williamson, P., Wallace, D. W., Law, C. S., et al. (2012) Ocean fertilization for geoengineering: A review of effectiveness, environmental impacts and emerging governance. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 90(6), 475–88.Google Scholar

World Ocean Review. (2010). World Ocean Review-1. Available at http://worldoceanreview.com/wp-content/downloads/wor1/WOR1_english.pdf.Google Scholar