Book contents
- Property Theory
- Property Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Public Nature of Private Property
- 2 Legal Forms in Property Law Theory
- 3 What Is the Right to Exclude and Why Does It Matter?
- 4 Using Things, Defining Property
- 5 Is Original Acquisition Problematic?
- 6 Appropriating Lockean Appropriation on Behalf of Equality
- 7 Rights, Distributed and Undistributed: On the Distributive Justice Implications of Lockean Property Rights, Especially in Land
- 8 Lockean Property Theory in Confucian Thought: Property in the Thought of Wang Fuzhi (1619–1692) and Huang Zongxi (1610–1695)
- 9 Two Ways of Theorizing ‘Collective Ownership of the Earth’
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 August 2018
Book contents
- Property Theory
- Property Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 The Public Nature of Private Property
- 2 Legal Forms in Property Law Theory
- 3 What Is the Right to Exclude and Why Does It Matter?
- 4 Using Things, Defining Property
- 5 Is Original Acquisition Problematic?
- 6 Appropriating Lockean Appropriation on Behalf of Equality
- 7 Rights, Distributed and Undistributed: On the Distributive Justice Implications of Lockean Property Rights, Especially in Land
- 8 Lockean Property Theory in Confucian Thought: Property in the Thought of Wang Fuzhi (1619–1692) and Huang Zongxi (1610–1695)
- 9 Two Ways of Theorizing ‘Collective Ownership of the Earth’
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Property TheoryLegal and Political Perspectives, pp. 215 - 230Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abizadeh, Arash. 2013. “A Critique of the ‘Common Ownership of the Earth’ Thesis,” 8 Les ateliers de l’éthique / The Ethics Forum 33.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S. 2009a. “The Complex Core of Property,” 94 Cornell Law Review 1063.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S. 2009b. “The Social-Obligation Norm in American Property Law,” 94 Cornell Law Review 745.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S., and Peña, Eduardo M.. 2012. An Introduction to Property Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alford, William P. 1995. To Steal a Book is an Elegant Offense: Intellectual Property Law in Chinese Civilisation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, W. W. 2014. “Accountability of Cotenants for Rents and Profits or Use and Occupation,” 51 American Law Reports 388.Google Scholar
Arruñada, Benito. 2011. “Property Titling and Conveyancing,” in Ayotte, Kenneth and Smith, Henry E., eds., Research Handbook on the Economics of Property Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ashcraft, Richard. 1994. “Locke's Political Philosophy,” in Chappell, Vere, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John. 1869. Lectures on Jurisprudence or the Philosophy of Positive Law. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Austin, John. 1875. Lectures on Jurisprudence, or, The Philosophy of Private Law. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Austin, Lisa M. 2014a. “The Power of the Rule of Law,” in Austin, Lisa M. and Klimchuk, Dennis, eds., Private Law and the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bagchi, Aditi. 2008. “Distributive Injustice and Private Law,” 60 Hastings Law Journal 105.Google Scholar
Bagchi, Aditi. 2014. “Distributive Justice and Contract,” in Klass, Gregory, Letsas, George and Saprai, Prince, eds., Philosophical Foundations of Contract Law. Oxford: Oxford Univesity Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. W. 1959. “Medieval Theories of the Just Price: Romanists, Canonists, and Theologians in the Twelve and Thirteenth Centuries,” 49 Transactions of the American Philosophical Society New Series 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balganesh, Shyamkrishna. 2008. “Demystifying the Right to Exclude: Of Property, Inviolability, and Automatic Injunctions,” 31 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 593.Google Scholar
Barak, Aharon. 2006. The Judge in a Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brandon, Douglas Ivor et al. 1984. “Self-Help: Extrajudicial Rights, Privileges and Remedies in Contemporary American Society,” 37 Vanderbilt Law Review 941.Google Scholar
Beckett, Katherine, and Herbert, Steve. 2010. “Penal Boundaries: Banishment and the Expansion of Punishment,” 35 Law & Society Inquiry 1.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel A. 2003. “Confucian Constraints on Property Rights,” in Bell, Daniel A. and Haim, Chaibong, eds., Confucianism for the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Stepahnie A., Henry, John F., and Wray, L. Randall. 2004. “A Chartalist Critique of John Locke's Theory of Property, Accumulation, and Money,” 62 Review of Social Economy 51.Google Scholar
Benson, Peter. 2002. “Philosophy of Property Law,” in Coleman, Jules L, Himma, Kenneth Eimar and Shapiro, Scott J., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Alison. 1989. Man and Nature in the Philosophical Thought of Wang Fu-chih. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. 1765–1769. Commentaries of the Laws of England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Breakey, Hugh. 2009. “Without Consent: Principles of Justified Acquisition and Duty-Imposing Powers,” 59 Philosophical Quarterly 618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Vivienne. 1999. “The ‘Figure’ of God and the Limits to Liberalism: A Rereading of Locke's ‘Essay’ and ‘Two Treatises’,” 60 Journal of the History of Ideas 83.Google Scholar
Brownstein, A. E. 1985. “What's the Use? A Doctrinal and Policy Critique of the Measurement of Loss of Use Damages,” 37 Rutgers Law Review 433.Google Scholar
Buckle, Stephen. 1991. Natural Law and the Theory of Property: Grotius to Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burk, Dan L. 2013. “Intellectual Property in the Cathedral,” in Beldiman, Dana, ed., Access to Information and Knowledge: 21 Century Challenges in Intellectual Property and Knowledge Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido, and Melamed, A. Douglas. 1972. “Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral,” 85 Harvard Law Review 1089.Google Scholar
Cao, Guoqing 曹国庆. 2009. Huang Zongxi ping zhuan 黄宗羲评传 [An Critical Biography of Huang Zongxi]. Beijing: China Social Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Albert H. Y. 2014. “The Concept of ‘Datong’ in Chinese Philosophy as an Expression of the Idea of the Common Good,” in Solomon, David and Lo, P. C., eds., The Common Good: Chinese and American Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Chen, Zhaohui 陈朝晖. 1994. “Lun Ming Qing shixue sichao zhong de tudi jingji sixiang” 论明清实学思潮中的土地经济思想 [“Land in Ming-Qing ‘Practical Learning’ Thought”], 4 Yantai Daxue Xuebao (zhexue shehui kexue ban) [Journal of Yantai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)] 15.Google Scholar
Chow, Kai-Wing. 2003. “Huang Zongxi,” in Yao, Xinzhong, ed., The Encyclopedia of Confucianism. Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Christman, John. 1991. “Self-ownership, Equality, and the Structure of Property Rights,” 19 Political Theory 28.Google Scholar
Christman, John. 1994. The Myth of Property: Toward an Egalitarian Theory of Ownership. New York, NY/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Claeys, Eric R. 2009. “Property 101: Is Property a Thing or a Bundle?,” 32 Seattle University Law Review 617–31.Google Scholar
Claeys, Eric R. 2014. “Intellectual Usufructs: Trade Secrets, Hot News, and the Usufructuary Paradigm at Common Law”, in Balganesh, Shyamkrisha, ed., Intellectual Property and The Common Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1995. Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch. 1999. “The Distributive Foundation of Corrective Justice,” 98 Michigan Law Review 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch. 2011. Property: Values and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch, and Dorfman, Avihay. 2016. “Just Relationships,” 116 Columbia Law Review 1395.Google Scholar
Dardess, John W. 2003. Blood and History: The Donglin Faction and its Repression (1620–1627). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
De Araujo, Marcelo. 2009. “Hugo Grotius, Contractualism, and the Concept of Private Property: An Institutionalist Interpretation,” 26 History of Philosophy Quarterly 353.Google Scholar
De Bary, Wm. Theodore. 1993. Waiting for the Dawn: A Plan for the Prince – Huang Tsung-hsi's Ming-i-tai-fang lu. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 1967. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights,” 57 American Economic Review 347.Google Scholar
Dickey, Anthony. 1972. “Hohfeld's Debt to Salmond,” 10 University of Western Australia Law Review 62.Google Scholar
Douglas, Simon, and McFarlane, Ben. 2013. “Defining Property Rights,” in Penner, James and Smith, Henry E., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Property Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dukeminier, Jesse, et al. 2010. Property. New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1996. “Do Liberty and Equality Conflict?,” in Barker, Paul, ed., Living as Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 1991. How Neighbours Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 2014. “The Affirmative Duties of Property Owners: An Essay for Tom Merrill,” 3 Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal 43.Google Scholar
Emerich, Yaëll. 2014. “Why Protect Possession,” in Descheemaeker, Eric, ed., The Consequences of Possession. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1979. “Possession as the Root of Title,” 13 Georgia Law Review 1221.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 2006. “Weak and Strong Conceptions of Property: An Essay in Memory of Jim Harris,” in Endicott, Timothy et al., eds., Properties of Law: Essays in Honour of Jim Harris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Essert, Christopher. 2013. “The Office of Ownership,” 63 University of Toronto Law Journal 418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essert, Christopher 2014. “Property in Licenses and the Law of Things,” 59 McGill Law Journnal 559.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne. 2011. “Commons, Anticommons, Semicommons,” in Ayotte, Kenneth and Smith, Henry E., eds., Research Handbook on the Economics of Property Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Peter J. 1993. “Social Security and Taxes,” in Kraybill, Donald B., ed., The Amish and The State. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Feser, Edward. 2005. “There is No Such Thing as an Unjust Initial Acquisition,” 22 Social Philosophy & Politics 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fichte, J. G. 2000. Foundations of Natural Right, According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, Sean, et al. 2008. “An Economic Justification for Open Access to Essential Medicine Patents in Developing Countries,” 37 Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederick, Danny. 2014. “Pro-tanto Versus Absolute Rights,” 45 The Philosophical Forum 375.Google Scholar
Fu, Pei-jung. 2002. “Tian (T'ien): Heaven,” in Cua, Antonio S., ed., Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gan, Orit. 2015. “The Justice Element of Promissory Estoppel,” 89 St. John's Law Review.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. 2017. “The Negligence Standard: Political Not Metaphysical,” 80 The Modern Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F., and Lomasky, Loren E.. 1990. “Are Property Rights Problematic?,” 75 Monist 493–5.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1982. “The Transformation of American Landlord-Tenant Law,” 23 Boston College Law Review 503.Google Scholar
Goldwin, Robert A. 1987. “John Locke,” in Strauss, Leo and Crospey, Joseph, eds., History of Political Philosophy (Third Edition). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gordley, J. 1991. The Philsophical Origins of Modern Contract Doctrine. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 1926. The Introduction to the Jurisprudence of Holland. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 2005 [1625]. The Rights of War and Peace. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 2006 [1868]. Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. 1985. “Hugo Grotius and the History of Political Thought,” 13 Political Theory 239.Google Scholar
Halpin, Andrew. 2017. “The Value of Hohfeldian Neutrality when Theorising about Legal Rights,” in McBride, Mark, ed., New Essays on the Nature of Rights. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Hart, H. 1972–73. “Rawls on Liberty and Its Priority,” 40 The University of Chicago Law Review 534.Google Scholar
Hayek, Freidrich A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1991 [1821]. Hegel, Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Michael A. 1998. “The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets,” 111 Harvard Law Review 621.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1991 [1651]. Leviathan. Revised Student Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1909. “Nature of Stockholders’ Individual Liability for Corporation Debts,” 9 Columbia Law Review 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1913. “The Relations between Equity and Law,” 11 Michigan Law Review 537.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1913–14. “Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning,” 23 Yale Law Journal 16.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1914. ‘A Vital School of Jurisprudence and Law: Have American Universities Awakened to the Enlarged Opportunities and Responsibility of the Present Day?’, 14 Handbook Ass'n Am. L. Schls. 76.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1916–17. “Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning,” 26 Yale Law Journal 710.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1923 [1913]. “Fundamental Legal Conceptions, I,” in Cook, W. W., ed., Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning and other Legal Essays. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Honoré, A. M. 1960. “Rights of Exclusion and Immunities against Divesting,” 34 Tulane Law Review 453.Google Scholar
Honoré, Tony. 1987a [1961]. “Ownership,” Making Law Bind: Essays Legal and Philosophical. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Honoré, Tony. 1987b [1977]. “Property, Title and Redistribution,” Making Law Bind: Essays Legal and Philosophical. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hu, Jichuang. 1988. A Concise History of Chinese Economic Thought. Beijing: Foreign Language Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Zhongjing 黄忠晶. 2008. “Huang Zongxi jingji sixiang jianlun” 黄宗羲经济思想简论 [“A Brief Discussion of Huang Zongxi's Economic Thought”], 9 Zhengzhou Qinggongye Xueyuan Xuebao (shehui kexue ban) [Journal of Zhengzhou University of Light Industry (Social Sciences)] 18.Google Scholar
Huang, Zongxi 黄宗羲. 1985a [17th century]. “Po xie lun” 破邪论 [“Arguments to Defeat Evil”], in Sun, Jiasui 孙家遂, ed., Huang Zongxi quanji: di yi ce 黄宗羲全集 ：第一册 [The Complete Works of Huang Zongxi: Volume 1]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Guji Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Zongxi. 1985b [1662]. “Ming yi dai fang lu” 明夷待访录 [“Waiting for the Dawn: A Plan for the Prince”], in Sun, Jiasui 孙家遂, ed., Huang Zongxi quanji: di yi ce 黄宗羲全集 ：第一册 [The Complete Works of Huang Zongxi: Volume 1]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Guji Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Jakob. 2017. “Theorising from the Global Standpoint: Kant and Grotius on Original Common Possession of the Earth,” 25. 2 European Journal of Philosophy 231.Google Scholar
Hunan University Press. 2009. Wang Chuanshan Yanjiu Zhuzhuo Gaiyao 王船山研究著作概要 [Abstracts and Summaries of Various Scholarship on Wang Fuzhi]. Changsha: Hunan University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, Pete. 2013. In the City of Bikes: The Story of the Amsterdam Cyclist. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1994. Ethical Philosophy: Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals; Metaphysical Principles of Virtue: With “On a Supposed Right to Lie Because of Philanthropic Concerns.” Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996 [1798]. “The Metaphysics of Morals,” in Gregor, Mary J., ed., Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Larissa. 2008. “Exclusion and Exclusivity in Property Law,” 58 University of Toronto Law Journal 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Larissa. 2012. “Governing through Owners: How and Why Formal Private Property Rights Enhance State Power,” 160 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2029.Google Scholar
Katz, Larissa. 2013. “The Relativity of Title and Causa Possessionis,” in Penner, James and Smith, Henry, eds., Philosophical Foundations of Property Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kemmis, Daniel. 1996. “Barn Raising,” in Vitek, William and Jackson, Wes, eds., Rooted in The Land: Essays on Community and Place. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, and Michelman, Frank. 1980. “Are Property and Contract Efficient?,” 8 Hofstra Law Review 711.Google Scholar
Klimchuk, Dennis. 2013. “Property and Necessity,” in Penner, James and Smith, Henry E., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Property Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kocourek, Albert. 1920. “Rights in Rem,” 68 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 322.Google Scholar
Laycock, Douglas. 2010. Modern American Remedies: Cases and Materials. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Legge, James. 2006. “The Chinese Classics, Volume 4.” Chinese Text Project, compiled by Donald Sturgeon. http://ctext.org/book-of-poetry.Google Scholar
Lehman, John Alan. 2006. “Intellectual Property Rights and Chinese Tradition Section: Philosophical Foundations,” 69 Journal of Business Ethics 1.Google Scholar
Li, Shouyong 李守庸. 1983. “Wang Fuzhi jingji sixiangzhongde jindai tedian pingyi” 王夫之经济思想中的近代特点评议 [“The Special, Modern Characteristics of Wang Fuzhi's Economic Thought”] 9 Jingji Yanjiu [Economic Research] 57.Google Scholar
Li, Shouyong. 1987. Wang Chuanshan jingji sixiang yanjiu 王船山经济思想研究 [Research on Wang Fuzhi's Economic Thought]. Changsha: Hunan's People Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Hanruo 刘含若. 1982. “Wang Fuzhi jingji sixiang san lun” 王夫之经济思想散论 [“Thoughts on Wang Fuzhi's Economic Thought”]. 4 Qiushi xuekan [Seeking Truth] 72.Google Scholar
Liu, JeeLoo. 2001. “Is Human History Predestined in Wang Fuzhi's Cosmology?,” 28 Journal of Chinese Philosophy 321.Google Scholar
Liu, JeeLoo. 2002. “Wang Fuzhi (Wang Fu-chih),” in Cua, Antonio S., ed., Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Liu, Qimei 刘岐梅. 2006. “Huang Zongxi yanjiu bainian shuping” 黄宗羲研究百年述评 [“A Review of the Study of Huang Zongxi in the 20th Century”], 23 Qingdao Daxue Shifanxueyuan xuebao [Journal of Teachers College, Qingdao University] 51.Google Scholar
Liu, Sky. 2004. “Contemporary Chinese Studies of Wang Fuzhi in Mainland China,” 3 Dao 307.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1695. “Venditio,” https://reconstructingeconomics.com/2014/06/06/venditio-by-john-locke/Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1975 [1689]. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1988 [1690]. “Second Treatise of Government,” in Laslett, Peter, ed., Locke: Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 2003 [1689]. “The Second Treatise of Government,” in Wooten, David, ed., John Locke: Political Writings. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Lou, Yulie. 2012. “Introduction to Volume 4,” in Yuan, Xingpei, ed., The History of Chinese Civilisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lueck, Dean. 2003. “First Possession as the Basis of Property,” in Anderson, Terry L. and McChesney, Fred S., eds., Property Rights: Cooperation, Conflict, and Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Luo, Langping 骆浪萍. 1987. “Huang Zongxi jingji sixiang zhi wo jian” 黄宗羲经济思想之我见 [“My Views on Huang Zongxi's Economic Thought”], 17 Hangzhou Daxue Xuebao [Journal of Hangzhou University] 14.Google Scholar
Ma, Ning 马宁. 2006. “Lun Wang Chuanshan ‘E-meng’ – wenzhong de jingji sixiang - du Wang Chuanshan ‘E-meng’ shouji yuangao you gan” 论王船山《噩梦》一文中的经济思想 – – 读王船山《噩梦》手迹原稿有感 [“Economic Thought in Wang Fuzhi's Strange Dream – Impressions after Reading Wang Fuzhi's Strange Dream in his Original Handwriting”], 3 Chuanshan xuekan [Chuanshan Journal] 15.Google Scholar
MacCormack, Geoffrey. 2013–14. “Natural Law in Traditional China,” 8 Journal of Comparative Law 104.Google Scholar
MacPherson, C. B. 1978. Property: Mainstream and Critical Positions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mack, E. 1995. “The Self-Ownership Proviso: A New and Improved Lockean Proviso,” 12 Social Philosophy and Policy 186.Google Scholar
Mancilla, Alejandra. 2017. “What the Old Right of Necessity Can Do for the Contemporary Global Poor,” 34 Journal of Applied Philosophy 607.Google Scholar
McFarlane, Ben, and Stevens, Roberts. 2010. “The Nature of Equitable Property,” 4 The Journal of Equity 1.Google Scholar
McMorran, Ian. 1992. The Passionate Realist: An Introduction to the Life and Political Thought of Wang Fuzhi. Hong Kong: Sunshine Book Company.Google Scholar
McMorran, Ian. 2000. “Late Confucian Scholarship: Wang Fuzhi,” in de Bary, Wm. Theodore and Lufrano, Richard, eds., Sources of Chinese Tradition, Volume 2: From 1600 through the Twentieth Century. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Melville, Herman. 1986. “Bartleby,” in Busch, Frederick and Budd, Billy, eds., Sailor and Other Stories 1. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Mendus, S. 2008. “Private Faces in Public Places,” in Kramer, M. H. et al., eds., The Legacy of HLA Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merges, Robert P., et al. 2012. Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 1998. “Property and the Right to Exclude,” 77 Nebraska Law Review 730.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2000. “The Landscape of Constitutional Property,” 86 Virgina Law Review 885.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2012. “The Property Strategy,” 160 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2061.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2014. “Property and the Right to Exclude II,” 3 Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal 3.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E.. 2000. “Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerous Clausus Principle,” 110 Yale Law Journal 1.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E. 2001a. “What Happened to Property in Law and Economics?,” 111 Yale Law Journal 357.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E. 2001b. “The Property/Contract Interface,” 101 Columbia Law Review 773.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Smith, Henry E. 2007. “The Morality of Property,” 48 William & Mary Law Review 1849.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 2011. “Property and Territory: Locke, Kant, and Steiner,” 19 Journal of Political Philosophy 90.Google Scholar
Moller, Dan. 2017. “Property and the Creation of Value,” 33 Economics and Philosophy 1.Google Scholar
Mossoff, Adam. 2003. “What is Property? Putting the Pieces Back Together,” 45 Arizona Law Review 371.Google Scholar
Mossoff, Adam. 2009. “Exclusion and Exclusive Use in Patent Law,” 22 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 330.Google Scholar
Mossoff, Adam. 2011. “The False Promise of the Right to Exclude,” 8 Economic Journal Watch 255.Google Scholar
Mossoff, Adam. 2017. “Trademark as a Property Right,” available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2941763Google Scholar
Myers, Peter C. 1995. “Between Divine and Human Sovereignty: The State of Nature and the Basis of Locke's Political Thought,” 27 Polity 629.Google Scholar
Newman, Christopher. 2011. “Transformation in Property and Copyright,” 56 Villanova University Law Review 260.Google Scholar
Newman, Christopher. 2017. “Vested Use Privileges in Property and Copyright,” 30 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 75.Google Scholar
Newman, Christopher. 2018. Hohfeld and the Theory of in Rem Rights: An Attempted Mediation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Marta C. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality and Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ocko, Jonathan. 2004. “The Missing Metaphor: Applying Western Legal Scholarship to the Study of Contract and Property in Early Modern China,” in Zelin, Madeleine, Ocko, Jonathan K. and Gardella, Robert, eds., Contract and Property in Early Modern China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Olivecrona, Karl. 1971. “The Concept of a Right According to Grotius and Pufendorf,”in Olivecrona, Karl, ed., Law as Fact. London: Stevens & Sons.Google Scholar
Oman, Nathan B. 2017. The Dignity of Commerce: Markets and The Moral Foundations of Contract Law. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Otsuka, Michael 2006. “Prerogatives to Depart from Equality,” 58 Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 95.Google Scholar
Ouyang, Kang. 2003. “Wang Fuzhi,” in Yao, Xinzhong, ed., Routledge Curzon Encyclopedia of Confucianism, O-Z. London/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parchomovsky, Gideon, and Stein, Alex. 2009. “Reconceptualizing Trespass,” 103 Northwestern University Law Review 1828.Google Scholar
Penner, J. E. 1996. “The ‘Bundle of Rights’ Picture of Property,” 43 UCLA Law Review 711.Google Scholar
Penner, J. E. 2013. “On the Very Idea of Transmissible Rights,” in Penner, James and Smith, Henry E., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Property Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Penner, J. E. 2018. “Locke on Equality and Inequality: The Consent to Value Money and ‘Positional’ Goods” (paper on file with the author).Google Scholar
Philbrick, F. S. 1938. “Changing Conceptions of Property in Law,” 86 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 691.Google Scholar
Platz, Jeppe von. 2013. “Absolute Freedom of Contract: Grotian Lessons for Libertarians,” 25 Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 107.Google Scholar
Potter, Pittman B. 2012. “Public Regulation of Private Relations: Changing Conditions of Property Regulation in China,” in Yu, Guanghua, ed., The Developement of the Chinese Legal System: Change and Challenges. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel von. 1729 [1672]. Of the Law of Nature and Nations. London: J Walthoe.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel von. 1934 [1672]. De Jure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Qiao, Liang 乔亮. 2007. “Huang Zongxi he Gong Zizhen jingji sixiang zhi bijiao” 黄宗羲和龚自珍经济思想之比较 [“Comparison between Huang Zongxi and Gong Zizhen's Economic Thought”], 26 Heilongjiang Jiaoyuxueyuan Xuebao [Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education] 14.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 2005. Political Liberalism, Expanded Edition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1977. “The Rule of Law and Its Virtues,” 93 The Law Quarterly Review 195.Google Scholar
Ren, Yuhai 任裕海. 2014. “Huang Zongxi yu Luoke zhengzhi zhexue de yizhong bijiao: zhengti jigou de neizai luoji ji qi xingshang liji” 黄宗羲与洛克政治哲学的一种比较 ：政体构建的内在逻辑及其形上理据 [“A Comparison of the Political Philosophy of Huang Zongxi and John Locke: The Inner Logic and Metaphysical Basis of Government Systems and Institutions”], 6 Fujian Luntan: Renwen shehui kexue ban [Fujian Forum: Social Sciences and Humanities Edition] 58.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. 2006. “Private Order and Public Justice: Kant and Rawls,” 92 Virgina Law Review 1931.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. 2009. Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. 2013. “Possession and Use,” in Penner, James and Smith, Henry E., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Property Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. 2017. “Property and Sovereignty: How to Tell the Difference,” 18 Theoretical Inquiries in Law.Google Scholar
Risse, Mathias. 2009a. “Common Ownership of the Earth as a Non-parochial Standpoint: A Contingent Derivation of Human Rights,” 17 European Journal of Philosophy 27.Google Scholar
Risse, Mathias. 2009b. “The Right to Relocation: Disappering Island Nations and Common Ownership of the Earth,” 23 Ethics & International Affairs 281.Google Scholar
Risse, Mathias. 2013a. “A Précis of on Global Justice, with Emphasis on Implications for International Institutions,” 54 Boston College Law Review 1037.Google Scholar
Risse, Mathias. 2013b. “Reply to Abizadeh, Chung and Farrelly,” 8 Les ateliers de l’éthique / The Ethics Forum 62.Google Scholar
Risse, Mathias. 2014a. “The Human Right to Water and Common Ownership of the Earth,” 22 Journal of Political Philosophy 178.Google Scholar
Risse, Mathias. 2014b. “Response to Arneson, de Bres, and Stilz,” 28 Ethics & International Affairs 511.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 1985. “Possession as the Origin of Property,” 52 University of Chicago Law Review 73.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 1992. “Giving, Trading, Thieving, and Trusting: How and Why Gifts Become Exchanges, and (More Importantly) Vice Versa,” 44 Florida Law Review 295.Google Scholar
Salmond, John W. 1972. The First Principles of Jurisprudence. London: Stevens & Haynes.Google Scholar
Salter, John. 2005. “Grotius and Pufendorf on the Right of Necessity,” 26 History of Political Thought 284.Google Scholar
Salter, John. 2010. “Adam Smith and the Grotian Theory of Property,” 12 British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3.Google Scholar
Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2016. “How Practices Matter,” 24 Journal of Political Philosophy 3.Google Scholar
Savigny, Freidrich Karl. 1867. System of the Modern Roman Law. Madras: J. Higginbotham.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. 1982. “Nozick on Rights, Liberty, and Property,” in Paul, Jeffrey, ed., Reading Nozick. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shi, Liang 时亮. 2011. “Lun heli keyu de tongzhi: Huang Zongxi yu Luoke zhi zhengzhi pipan jianming duikan” 论合理可欲的统治 ：黄宗羲与洛克之政治批判简明对勘 [“For Reasonable Governance – A Comparative Study of the Critiques of Government between Huang Zongxi and John Locke”], 5 Zhengzhi sixiangshi [Journal of the History of Political Thought] 15.Google Scholar
Shimokawa, Kiyoshi. 2013. “The Origin and Development of Property: Conventionalism, Unilateralism, and Colonialism,” in Anstey, Peter R., ed., The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1992. The Lockean Theory of Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2004. “Property and Property Rules,” 79 New York University Law Review 1719.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2005. “Self-Help and the Nature of Property,” 1 The Journal of Law, Economics & Policy 80.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2006. “Property and Property Rules,” 79 New York University Law Review 388.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2009. “Mind the Gap: The Indirect Relation between Ends and Means in American Property Law,” 94 Cornell Law Review 959–64.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2013. “Emergent Property,” in Penner, James and Smith, Henry, eds., Philosophical Foundations of Property Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2014. “Property, Equity, and the Rule of Law,” in Austin, Lisa M. and Klimchuk, Dennis, eds., Private Law and the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2015. “The Persistence of System in Property Law,” 163 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2055.Google Scholar
Smith, Lionel. 2003. “The Motive, Not the Deed,” in Getzler, Joshua, ed., Rationalizing Property, Equity and Trusts, Essays in Honour of Edward Burn. London: LexisNexis UK.Google Scholar
Smith, Noah. 2015. “The Threat Coming by Land.” www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2015-09-09/the-threat-coming-by-landGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, G. 1995. The Limits of Lockean Rights in Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stapelbroek, Koen. 2014. “Property,” in Savonius-Wroth, S.-J., ed., The Bloomsbury Companion to Locke. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Steiner, Hillel. 1987. “Capitalism, Justice, and Equal Starts,” 5 Social Philosophy and Policy 49.Google Scholar
Sterk, Stewart E. 2008. “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Uncertainty about Property Rights,” 106 Michigan Law Review 1285.Google Scholar
Stern, James Y. 2017. “The Essential Structure of Property Law,” 115 Michigan Law Review 1177.Google Scholar
Stevens, Robert. 2012. “When and Why does Unjustified Enrichment Justify the Recognition of Propriety Rights?,” 92 Boston University Law Review 923.Google Scholar
Stilz, Anna. 2014. “On Collective Ownership of the Earth,” 28 Ethics & International Affairs 501.Google Scholar
Strahilevitz, Lior Jacob. 2006. “Information Asymmetries and the Rights to Exclude,” 104 Michigan Law Review 1835.Google Scholar
Struve, Lynn. 1988. “Huang Zongxi in Context: A Reappraisal of his Major Writings,” 47 The Journal of Asian Studies 474.Google Scholar
Struve, Lynn. 2002. “Huang Zongxi (Huang Chung-hsi),” in Cua, Antonio S., ed., Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. 1944. “De legibus, ac Deo legislatore,” in Williams, Gwladis L., Brown, Ammi and Waldron, John, eds., Selections from Three Works. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Baoshan 孙宝山. 2008. Fangu kaixin: Huang Zongxi de zhengzhi sixiang 返古开新 ：黄宗羲的政治思想 [Returning to the Old and Creating the New: The Political Thought of Huang Zongxi]. Beijing: People's Press.Google Scholar
Tan, Mingran. 2010. “Crisis and Hermeneutics: Wang Fuzhi's Interpretation of Confucian Classics in a Time of Radical Change from Ming to Qing Dynasties” Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate Department of East Asian Studies. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael. 2004. “What is it to Wrong Someone? A Puzzle about Justice,” in Wallace, R. Jay et al., eds., Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1986. “Self-defense and Rights,” in Parent, William, ed., Rights, Restitution, and Risk. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1990. The Realm of Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1979. Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1993. Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uzgalis, William. 2016. “John Locke,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/locke/.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, Peter. 2000. “Introduction: Left-Libertarianism – A Primer,” in Vallentyne, Peter and Steiner, Hillel, eds., Left Libertarianism and Its Critics: The Contemporary Debate. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Van Ittersum, Martine. 2005–2007. “Preparing Mare Liberum for the Press: Hugo Grotius’ Rewriting of Chapter Twelve of De Jure Praedae in November–December 1608,” 26–28 Grotiana 246.Google Scholar
Van Ittersum, Martine. 2009. “Dating the Manuscript of De Jure Praedae (1604–1608): What Watermarks, Foliation and Quire Divisions Can Tell Us about Hugo Grotius’ Development as a Natural Rights and Natural Law Theorist,” 35 History of European Ideas 125.Google Scholar
Van Norden, Bryan W. 2008. Mengzi: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis, IN/Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Vossen, Bas van der. 2009. “What Counts as Original Appropriation?,” 8 Politics, Philosophy & Economics 355.Google Scholar
Vossen, Bas can der. 2015. “Imposing Duties and Original Appropriation,” 23 Journal of Political Philosophy 64.Google Scholar
Waddams, Stephen. 2011. Principle and Policy in Contract Law: Competing or Complementary Concepts? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1985. “What is Private Property,” 5 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 313.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2008b. “Do Judges Reason Morally?,” in Huscroft, Grant, ed., Expounding the Constitution: Essays on Constitutional Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2010. “Property Law,” in Patterson, Dennis, ed., A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2013. “Is Dignity the Foundation of Human Rights?,” 12 New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers 73.Google Scholar
Wang, Fuzhi 王夫之. 1964 [1691]. Song lun 宋论 [Discussions on the Song Dynasty]. Beijing: Zhonghua Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Fuzhi 1996a [1682]. “E Meng” 噩梦 [“Strange Dreams”], in Chuanshan quanshu di shi er ce 船山全书第12册 [The Complete Works of Wang Chuanshan: Volume 12]. Changsha: Yuelu Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Fuzhi 1996b [1687]. “Du Tongjian lun” 读通鉴论 [“On Reading Sima Guang's Comprehensive Mirror in Aid of Governance”], in Chuanshan quanshu di shi ce 船山全书第10册 [The Complete Works of Wang Chuanshan: Volume 10]. Changsha: Yuelu Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Jinmin. 2012. “Proto-Enlightenment Trends and New Elements in Political Culture,” in Yuan, Xingpei, ed., The History of Chinese Civilization, Volume IV: Late Ming and Qing Dynasties (1525–1911). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J. 1995. The Idea of Private Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J. 2011. “Private Law and Public Right,” 61 University of Toronto Law Journal 191.Google Scholar
Wellman, Christopher Heath. 1995. “On Conflicts between Rights,” 14 Law and Philosophy 271.Google Scholar
West, Robin L. 2001. Re-Imagining Justice: Progressive Interpretations of Formal Equality, Rights, and the Rule of Law Aldershot, UK/Burlington, VT: Ashgate/Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Widerquist, Karl. 2010. “Lockean Theories of Property: Justifications for Unilateral Appropriation,” 2 Public Reason 3.Google Scholar
Winstanley, Gerrard. 2009. “The Law of Freedom,” in Corns, Thomas N., Hughes, Ann and Loewenstein, David, eds., The Complete Works of Gerrard Winstanley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Xiao, Pinghan 萧平汉 and Liu, Zhenxi 刘珍喜. 2007. “Wang Fuzhi jingji sixiang xinlun” 王夫之经济思想新论 [“A New Discussion of Wang Fuzhi's Economic Thought”], 2 Chuanshan xuekan [Chuanshan Journal] 5.Google Scholar
Xu, Dingbao 徐定宝. 2009a. Huang Zongxi ping zhuan 黄宗羲评传 [A Critical Biography of Huang Zongxi]. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Yanmin. 2009b. “Huang Zongxi,” in Cheng, Linsun, ed., Berkshire Encyclopedia of China (Vol. 3). Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire.Google Scholar
Yeung, Jason Hing Kau 杨庆球. 2005. Minzhu yu minben: Luoke yu Huang Zongxi de zhengzhi ji zongjiao sixiang 民主与民本 ：洛克与黄宗羲的政治及宗教思想 [People-as-Masters and People-at-the-Root: The Political and Religious Thought of Locke and Huang Zongxi]. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2011. Responsibility for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yu, Peter K. 2012. “Intellectual Property and Asian Values,” 16 Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 340.Google Scholar
Zelin, Madeleine. 2004. “A Critique of Rights of Property in Pre-War China,” in Zelin, Madeleine, Ocko, Jonathan K. and Gardella, Robert, eds., Contract and Property in Early Modern China. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Zelin, Madeleine, Ocko, Jonathan K., and Gardella, Robert. 2004. “Introduction,” in Zelin, Madeleine, Ocko, Jonathan K. and Gardella, Robert, eds., Contract and Property in Early Modern China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Zeng, Kunsheng 曾坤生. 1993. “Wang Fuzhi jingji sixiang chutan” 王夫之经济思想初探 [“A Preliminary Exploration of Wang Fuzhi's Economic Thought”], 2 Guangxi shehui kexue [Guangxi Social Sciences] 54.Google Scholar
Zhang, Chuanxi. 2012a. “Shang and Zhou: The Patriarchal Clan System and Related Institutions,” in Yuan, Xingpei, ed., The History of Chinese Civilization, Volume 1: Earliest Times to 221 B.C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Huai 张怀. 1997. Wang Fuzhi ping zhuan: minzu ziliziqiang zhi hun 王夫之评传 ：民族自立自强之魂 [A Critical Biography of Wang Fuzhi: The Soul of Self-Improvement of Nationalism]. Nanning: Guangxi Education Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Mo. 2008. “From Public to Private: The Newly Enacted Chinese Property Law and the Protection of Property Rights in China,” 5 Berkeley Business Law Journal 317.Google Scholar
Zhang, Ru'an 张如安, and Huangfu, Xianchang 皇甫贤昌. 1996. “1990–1994 nian guonei Huang Zongxi yanjiu zongshu” 年国内黄宗羲研究综述 [“An Overview of Research done on Huang Zongxi in Mainland China from 1990 to 1994”], 1 Zhongguo shi yanjiu dongtai [State of Research on Chinese History] 14.Google Scholar
Zhang, Taisu. 2011. “Property Rights in Land, Agricultural Capitalism, and the Relative Decline of Pre-Industrual China,” 13 San Diego International Law Review 129.Google Scholar
Zhang, Taisu. 2014. “Social Hierarchies and the Formation of Customary Property Law in Pre-Industrial China and England,” 62 American Journal of Comparative Law 171.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yongzhong 张永忠. 2008. “Junzhu biange yu biange junzhu: bijiao Huang Zongxi yu Luoke de zhengzhi zhexue” 君主变革与变革君主 ：比较黄宗羲与洛克的政治哲学 [“Monarch Reform and Reforming Autocracy: A Comparison between Huang Zongxi's and Locke's Political Philosophy”], 4 Hangzhou Dianzi Keji Daxue Xuebao (shehui kexue ban) [Journal of Hangzhou Dianzi University (Social Sciences)] 1.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yongzhong. 2009. Huang Zongxi zhengzhi zhexue sixiang yanjiu 黄宗羲政治哲学思想研究 [Research on the Political Philosophy of Huang Zongxi]. Beijing: People's Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yuanyuan 张圆圆. 2012b. “Lun Huang Zongxi jingji sixiang” 论黄宗羲经济思想 [“Huang Zongxi's Economic Thought”], 217 Xueshu Jiaoliu [Academic Exchange] 116.Google Scholar
Zhao, Yanhua 赵延花. 2005. “Lun Huang Zongxi de shimin jingji sixiang” 论黄宗羲的市民经济思想 [“Huang Zongxi's Social Economic Thought”], 12 Beifang Jingji [Northern Economy] 78.Google Scholar