Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T15:53:21.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Invasive Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2021

By
John A. Lewis
Edited by
Stephen de Mora ,
Timothy Fileman  and
Thomas Vance
Stephen de Mora
Affiliation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Timothy Fileman
Affiliation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Thomas Vance
Affiliation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Get access

Summary

Through the eras since life first appeared on planet Earth, biological species have been spread around the globe, both within and between landmasses and water bodies. The current biogeographical mosaic of communities and ecosystems has evolved in response to tectonic movement, climatic fluctuations and consequent sea-level rises and falls, as well as biological adaptions to the physical and chemical environment. The environmental requisites or tolerances, competitive strengths and weaknesses, mechanisms of dispersal and reproductive strategies dictate the ability of a species to survive, propagate and expand populations, with the success, speed and distances of spread governed by not only individual species traits, but also the structure of, and ecological processes within, surrounding ecosystems. Through the evolution of the biosphere, the interactions of physical and chemical conditions – and between biological species – has led to constraints on the distributions of the myriad plants and animals, with many now defined as native, or indigenous, to specific regions. Species abundances and distributional boundaries are, however, dynamic over short and long periods of time.

Type
Chapter
Information
Environmental Impact of Ships , pp. 165 - 215
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ab Rahim, ES, Nguyen, TTT, Ingram, B et al. (2016). Species composition and hybridisation of mussel species (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) in Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 67, 1955–1963.Google Scholar
Adebayo, AA, Zhan, A, Bailey, SA, MacIsaac, HJ (2014). Domestic ships as a potential pathway of nonindigenous species from the Saint Lawrence River to the Great Lakes. Biological Invasions 16, 793–801.Google Scholar
AFFA (2011). Australian Ballast Water Management Requirements, Version 5.3. Canberra: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.Google Scholar
Albert, RJ, Lishman, JM, Saxena, JR (2013). Ballast water regulations and the move toward concentration-based numeric discharge limits. Ecological Applications 23, 289–300.Google Scholar
Apte, S, Holland, BS, Godwin, LS, Gardner, PA (2000) Jumping ship: a stepping stone event mediating transfer of a non-indigenous species via a potentially unsuitable environment. Biological Invasions 2, 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardura, A, Planes, S (2017). Rapid assessment of non-indigenous species in the era of the eDNA barcoding: a Mediterranean case study. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 188, 81–87.Google Scholar
ASA (2006). Assessment of Introduced Marine Pest Risks Associated with Niche Areas in Commercial Shipping: Final Report. Report to Invasive Marine Species Program, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra. Melbourne: Australian Shipowners Association.Google Scholar
Australian Government (2009a). National Biofouling Management Guidelines for Commercial Vessels. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian Government (2009b). National Biofouling Management Guidance for Non-Trading Vessels. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian Government (2009c). National Biofouling Management Guidance for the Petroleum Production and Exploration Industry. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian Government (2015). Biosecurity Act 2015. No. 61, 2015. Authorized Version C2015A00061. Federal Register of Legislation. www.legislation.gov.auGoogle Scholar
Bailey, SA (2015). An overview of thirty years of research on ballast water as a vector for aquatic invasive species to freshwater and marine environments. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 18, 261–268.Google Scholar
Bailey, SA, Deneau, MG, Jean, L et al. (2011). Evaluating efficacy of an environmental policy to prevent biological invasions. Environmental Science & Technology 45, 2554–2561.Google Scholar
Barnes, DKA (2002). Invasions by marine life on plastic debris. Nature 416, 808–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, DKA, Fraser, KPP (2003). Rafting by five phyla on man-made flotsam in the Southern Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 262, 289–291.Google Scholar
Barnes, DKA, Milner, P (2005). Drifting plastic and its consequences for sessile organism dispersal in the Atlantic Ocean. Marine Biology 146, 815–825.Google Scholar
Bastida-Zavala, JR, ten Hove, HA (2003). Revision of Hydroides Gunnerus, 1768 (Polychaeta: Serpulidae) from the Eastern Pacific Ocean and Hawaii. Beaufortia 53, 67–110.Google Scholar
Bayha, KM, Chang, MH, Mariani, CL et al. (2015). Worldwide phylogeography of the invasive ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora) based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA data. Biological Invasions 17, 827–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudouresque, CF (1999). The Red Sea–Mediterranean link: unwanted effects of canals. In: Sandlund, OT, Schei, PJ, Viken, Å, eds., Invasive Speciss and Biodiversity Management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 213–228.Google Scholar
Boudouresque, CF, Verlaque, M (2002). Assessing scale and impact of ship-transported alien macrophytes in the Mediterranean Sea. In: Briand, F, ed., Alien Marine Organisms introduced by Ships in the Mediterranean and Black Seas. Workshop Monographs No. 20. Monaco: CIESM, pp. 53–62.Google Scholar
Briggs, JC (2007). Marine biogeography and ecology: invasions and introductions. Journal of Biogeography 34, 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, JC (2010). Marine biology: the role of accommodation in shaping marine biodiversity. Marine Biology 157, 2117–2126.Google Scholar
Briggs, JC (2012). Marine species invasions in estuaries and harbors. Marine Ecology Progress Series 449, 297–302.Google Scholar
Briggs, JC (2013). Invasion ecology: origin and biodiversity effects. Environmental Skeptics and Critics 2(3), 73–81.Google Scholar
Briski, E, Ghabooli, S, Bailey, S, MacIsaac, H (2012). Invasion risk posed by macroinvertebrates transported in ships' ballast tanks. Biological Invasions 14, 1843–1850.Google Scholar
Bruno, JF, Fridley, JD, Bromberg, KD, Bertness, MD (2003). Insights into biotic interactions from studies of species invasions. In: Sax, DF, Stachowicz, JJ, Gaines, SD, eds., Species Invasions: Insights into Ecology, Evolution and Biogeography. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc., pp. 13–40.Google Scholar
Buchanan, S, Babcock, R (1997) Primary and secondary settlement of the greenshell mussel Perna canaliculus. Journal of Shellfish Research, 16, 71–76.Google Scholar
Bulleri, F, Airoldi, L (2005). Artificial marine structures facilitate the spread of a non-indigenous green alga, Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides, in the north Adriatic Sea. Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 1063–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulleri, F, Chapman, MG (2010). The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine environments. Journal of Applied Ecology 47, 26–35.Google Scholar
Buschbaum, C, Chapman, AS, Saier, B (2006). How an introduced seaweed can affect epibiota diversity in different coastal systems. Marine Biology 148(4), 743–754.Google Scholar
Calado, R, Chapman, PM (2006). Aquarium species: deadly invaders. Marine Pollution Bulletin 52, 599–601.Google Scholar
Callow, ME (1986). Fouling algae from ‘in-service’ ships. Botanica Marina 29, 351–357.Google Scholar
Campbell, ML, Hewitt, CL (1999). Vectors, shipping and trade. In: Hewitt, CL, Campbell, ML, Thresher, RE, Martine, RB, eds., Marine Biological Invasions of Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. Centre for Research on Introduced Marine Pests. Technical Report No. 20. Hobart: CSIRO Marine Research, pp. 45–60.Google Scholar
Cardeccia, A, Marchini, A, Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A et al. (2018). Assessing biological invasions in European Seas: biological traits of the most widespread non-indigenous species. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 201, 17–28.Google Scholar
Carlton, JT (1985). Transoceanic and interoceanic dispersal of coastal marine organisms: the biology of ballast water. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 23, 313–371.Google Scholar
Carlton, JT (1999). The scale and ecological consequences of biological invasions in the world’s oceans. In, Sandlund, OT, Schei, PJ, Viken, Å, eds., Invasive Speciss and Biodiversity Management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 195–212.Google Scholar
Carlton, JT (2001). Introduced Species in U.S. Coastal Waters: Environmental Impacts and Management Priorities. Arlington, VA: Pew Oceans Committee.Google Scholar
Carlton, JT, Geller, JB (1993). Ecological roulette: the global transport of non-indigenous species. Science 261(5117), 78–82.Google Scholar
Carlton, JT, Chapman, JW, Geller, JB et al. (2017). Tsunami-driven rafting: transoceanic species dispersal and implications for marine biogeography. Science 357, 1402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CBD (2016). Press Release: The Honolulu Challenge: an ambitious initiative to tackle the threat of invasive alien species. 29 November 2016. United Nations Environment Programme, Convention on Biological Diversity. www.cbd.int/doc/press/2016/pr-2016-11-29-HonoluluChallenge-en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cheniti, R, Rochon, A, Frihi, H (2018). Ship traffic and the introduction of diatoms and dinoflagellates via ballast water in the port of Annaba, Algeria. Journal of Sea Research 133, 154–165.Google Scholar
Chew, MK (2015). Ecologists, environmentalists, experts, and the invasion of the ‘second greatest threat’. International Review of Environmental History 1, 7–40.Google Scholar
Clarke, GF, Johnston, EL (2005) Manipulating larval supply in the field: a controlled study of marine invisibility. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 298, 9–19.Google Scholar
Cohen, AN, Carlton, JT (1998). Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279, 555.Google Scholar
Cohen, AN, Dobbs, FC, Chapman, PM (2017). Revisiting the basis for US ballast water regulations. Marine Pollution Bulletin 118, 348–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connell, SD, Glasby, TM (1999). Do urban structures influence local abundance and diversity of subtidal epibiota? A case study from Sydney Harbour, Australia. Marine Environmental Research 47(4), 373–387.Google Scholar
Coutinho, R, Gonçalves, JEA, Messano, LVR, Ferreira, CEL (2013). Avaliação Crítica das Bioinvasões por Bioincrustação. A Ressurgência. No. 7: 11–18. Instituto de Estudos do Mar Almirante Paulo Moreira – IEAPM. Marinha do Brasil. www.redebim.dphdm.mar.mil.br/vinculos/000009/00000910.pdfGoogle Scholar
Coutts, ADM (1999). Hull fouling as a modern vector for marine biological invasions: investigation of merchant vessels visiting northern Tasmania. MSc thesis, Australian Maritime College.Google Scholar
Coutts, ADM, Dodgshun, TJ (2007). The nature and extent of organisms in vessel sea-chests: a protected mechanism for marine bioinvasions. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54, 875–886.Google Scholar
Coutts, ADM, Forrest, BM (2007). Development and application of tools for incursion response: lessons learned from the management of the fouling pest Didemnum vexillum. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 342, 154–162.Google Scholar
Coutts, ADM, Taylor, MD (2004). A preliminary investigation of biosecurity risks associated with biofouling on merchant vessels in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine & Freshwater Research 38, 215–229.Google Scholar
Coutts, ADM, Taylor, MD, Hewitt, CL (2007). Novel method for assessing the en route survivorship of biofouling organisms on various vessel types. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54, 97–116.Google Scholar
Coutts, ADM, Piola, RF, Hewitt, CL, Connell, SD, Gardner, JPA (2010). Effect of vessel voyage speed on survival of biofouling organisms: implications for translocation of non-indigenous marine species. Biofouling: The Journal of Bioadhesion and Biofilm Research 26, 1–13.Google Scholar
Crego-Prieto, V, Ardura, A, Juanes, F et al. (2015). Aquaculture and the spread of introduced mussel genes in British Columbia. Biological Invasions 17, 2011–2026.Google Scholar
CSLC (2017). Title 2. Administration. Division 3. State Property Operation. Chapter 1. State Lands Commission. Article 4.8. Biofouling Management to Minimize the Transfer of Nonindigenous Species from Vessels Arriving at California Ports. California State Lands Commission, Sacramento, CA. http://slc.ca.gov/laws-regulations/current-regulationsGoogle Scholar
Cuesta, JA, Bruon, A, Pérez-Dieste, J, Trigo, JE, Bañón, B (2016). Role of ships’ hull fouling and tropicalization process on European carcinofauna: new records in Galiciain waters (NW Spain). Biological Invasions 18, 619–630.Google Scholar
Dafforn, KA, Glasby, TM, Johnston, EL (2007). Differential effects of tributyltin and copper anti-foulants on recruitment of non-indigenous species. Biofouling 24, 23–33.Google Scholar
Dafforn, KA, Glasby, TM, Johnston, EL (2012). Comparing the invisibility of experimental ‘reefs’ with field observations of natural reefs and artificial structures. PLoS ONE 7, e38124.Google Scholar
DAISIE (2009). Handbook of Alien Species in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
David, KAB, Keiron, PPF (2003). Rafting by five phyla on man-made flotsam in the Southern Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 262, 289–291.Google Scholar
David, M, Gollasch, S (2008). EU shipping in the dawn of managing the ballast water issue. Marine Pollution Bulletin 56, 1966–1972.Google Scholar
Davidson, I, Simkanin, C (2012). The biology of ballast water 25 years later. Biological Invasions 14, 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, IC, Brown, CW, Sytsma, MD, Ruiz, GM (2009). The role of containerships as transfer mechanisms of marine biofouling species. Biofouling 25, 645–655.Google Scholar
Davidson, I, Scianni, C, Hewitt, C et al. (2016). Mini-review: assessing the drivers of ship biofouling management – aligning industry and biosecurity goals. Biofouling 32, 411–428.Google Scholar
Davis, MA, Chew, MK (2017). ‘The denialists are coming!’ Well, not exactly: a response to Russell and Blackburn. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32, 229–230.Google Scholar
DAWR (2017). Australian Ballast Water Management Requirements. Version 7. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Agriculture and Water Resources.Google Scholar
De Clerck, O, Gavio, B, Fredericq, S, Bárbara, I, Coppejans, E (2005). Systematics of Grateloupia filicina (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta), based on rbcL sequence analyses and morphological evidence, including the reinstatement of G. minima and the description of G. capensis sp. nov. Journal of Phycology 41, 391–410.Google Scholar
Demirel, YK, Uzun, D, Zhang, Y et al. (2017). Effect of barnacle fouling on ship resistance and powering. Biofouling 33, 819–834.Google Scholar
Department of Fisheries (2014). Western Australian Prevention List for Introduced Marine Pests. Perth: Government of Western Australia, Department of Fisheries.Google Scholar
Desai, DV, Narale, D, Khandeparker, L, Anil, AC (2018). Potential ballast water transfer of organisms from the west to the east coast of India: insights through on board sampling. Journal of Sea Research 133, 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, JM, Lodge, DM (2006). Allee effects, propagule pressure and the probability of establishment: risk analysis for biological invasions. Biological Invasions 8, 365–375.Google Scholar
Drake, LA, Choi, KH, Ruiz, GM, Dobbs, FC (2001). Global redistribution of bacterioplankton and virioplankton communities. Biological Invasions 3, 193–199.Google Scholar
Drake, LA, Doblin, MA, Dobbs, FC (2007). Potential microbial bioinvasions via ships' ballast water, sediment, and biofilm. Marine Pollution Bulletin 55, 333–341.Google Scholar
Edelist, D, Rilov, G, Golani, D, Carlton, JT, Spanier, E (2013). Restructuring the sea: profound shifts in the world’s most invaded marine ecosystem. Diversity and Distributions 19, 69–77.Google Scholar
Einfeldt, AL, Addison, JA (2015). Anthropocene invasion of an ecosystem engineer: resolving the history of Corophium volutator (Amphipoda: Corophiidae) in the North Atlantic. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 115, 288–304.Google Scholar
Elton, C (1958). The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
EPA Victoria (2008) Protocol for Environmental Management: Domestic Ballast Water Management in Victorian State Waters. Southbank: EPA Victoria.Google Scholar
Epstein, G, Smale, DA (2018). Environmental and ecological factors influencing the spillover of the non-native kelp, Undaria pinnatifida, from marinas into natural rocky reef communities. Biological Invasions 20, 1049–1072.Google Scholar
Escapa, M, Isacch, JP, Daleo, P et al. (2004). The distribution and ecological effects of the introduced Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793) in northern Patagonia. Journal of Molluscan Research 23, 765–772.Google Scholar
Evans, LV (1981) Marine algae and fouling: a review, with particular reference to ship-fouling. Botanica Marina, 24, 167–171.Google Scholar
Farnham, WF, Irvine, LM (1968). Occurrence of unusually large plants of Grateloupia in the vicinity of Portsmouth. Nature 219, 744–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrario, J, Caronni, S, Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A, Marchini, A (2017). Role of commercial harbours and recreational marinas in the spread of non-indigenous fouling species. Biofouling 33, 651–660.Google Scholar
Finenko, GA, Anninsky, BE, Datsyk, NA (2018). Mnemiopsis leidyi A. Agassiz, 1865 (Ctenophora: Lobata) in the inshore areas of the Black Sea: 25 years after its outbreak. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions 9, 86–93.Google Scholar
Firth, LB, Knights, AM, Bell, SS (2011). Air temperature and winter mortality: Implications for the persistence of the invasive mussel, Perna viridis in the intertidal zone of teh south-eastern United States. Journal of Experimental Marien Biology and Ecology 400, 250–256.Google Scholar
Flagella, MM, Verlaque, M, Soria, A, Buia, MC (2007). Macroalgal survival in ballast water tanks. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54, 1395–1401.Google Scholar
Floerl, O (2002). Intracoastal spread of fouling organisms by recreational vessels. PhD thesis, James Cook University.Google Scholar
Floerl, O (2005). Factors that influence hull fouling on ocean-going vessels. In: Godwin, LS, ed., Hull Fouling as a Mechanism for Marine Invasive Species Introductions: Proceedings of a Workshop on Current Issues and Potential Management Strategies, February 12–13, 2003. Honolulu, HI: Bishop Museum.Google Scholar
Floerl, O, Coutts, ADM (2009). Potential ramifications of the global economic crisis on human-mediated dispersal of marine non-indigenous species. Marine Pollution Bulletin 58, 1595–1598.Google Scholar
Floerl, O, Inglis, GJ (2005). Starting the invasion pathway: the interaction between source populations and human transport vectors. Biological Invasions 7, 589–606.Google Scholar
Floerl, O, Pool, TK, Inglis, GJ (2004). Positive interactions between non-indigenous species facilitate transport by human vectors. Ecological Applications 14, 1724–1736.Google Scholar
Floerl, O, Inglis, GJ, Hayden, BJ (2005a). A risk-based predictive tool to prevent accidental introductions of nonindigenous marine species. Environmental Management 35, 765–778.Google Scholar
Floerl, O, Inglis, GJ, Marsh, HM (2005b). Selectivity in vector management: an investigation of the effectiveness of measures used to prevent transport of non-indigenous species. Biological Invasions 7, 459–475.Google Scholar
Folino-Rorem, N, Darling, J, D'Ausilio, C (2009). Genetic analysis reveals multiple cryptic invasive species of the hydrozoan genus Cordylophora. Biological Invasions 11, 1869–1882.Google Scholar
Frey, MA, Simard, N, Robichaud, DD, Martin, JL, Therriault, TW (2014). Fouling around: vessel sea-chests as a vector for the introduction and spread of aquatic invasive species. Management of Biological Invasions 5, 21–30.Google Scholar
Fuentes, V, Angel, D, Bayha, K et al. (2010). Blooms of the invasive ctenophore, Mnemiopsis leidyi, span the Mediterranean Sea in 2009. Hydrobiologia 645, 23–37.Google Scholar
Fulton, SW, Grant, FE (1900). Note on the occurrence of the European crab, Carcinus maenas, Leach, in Port Phillip. Victorian Naturalist 17, 145–146.Google Scholar
Fulton, SW, Grant, FE (1902). Some little known Victorian decapod crustacea with description of a new species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 14, 55–64.Google Scholar
Galil, B, Boero, F, Campbell, M et al. (2015). ‘Double trouble’: the expansion of the Suez Canal and marine bioinvasions in the Mediterranean Sea. Biological Invasions 17, 973–976.Google Scholar
Gepp, A, Gepp, ES (1906). Some marine algae from New South Wales. Journal of Botany, London 44, 249–261, Plate 481.Google Scholar
Gewing, MT, Shenkar, N (2017). Monitoring the magnitude of marine vessel infestation by non-indigenous ascidians in the Mediterranean. Marine Pollution Bulletin 121, 52–59.Google Scholar
Glasby, TM (1999). Effects of shading on subtidal epibiotic assemblages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 234, 275–290.Google Scholar
Glasby, TM (2013) Caulerpa taxifolia in seagrass meadows: killer or opportunistic weed? Biological Invasions 15, 1017–1035.Google Scholar
Glasby, TM, Connell, SD (1999). Urban structures as marine habitats. Ambio 28, 595–598.Google Scholar
Glasby, TM, Creese, RG (2007). Invasive marine species management and research. In: Connell, SD, Gillanders, BM, eds., Marine Ecology. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, pp. 569–594.Google Scholar
Glasby, T, Connell, S, Holloway, M, Hewitt, C (2007). Nonindigenous biota on artificial structures: could habitat creation facilitate biological invasions? Marine Biology 151, 887–895.Google Scholar
Gollasch, S (1998). The asian decapod Hemigrapsus penicillatus (de Haan, 1835) (Grapsidae, Decapoda) introduced in European waters: status quo and future perspective. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen 52, 359–366.Google Scholar
Gollasch, S (2002). The importance of ship hull fouling as a vector of species introductions into the North Sea. Biofouling 18, 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollasch, S (2007). Is ballast water a major dispersal mechanism for marine organisms? In: Nentwig, W, ed., Biological Invasions. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 49–57.Google Scholar
Gollasch, S, Lenz, J, Dammer, M, Andres, HG (2000a). Survival of tropical ballast water organisms during a cruise from the Indian Ocean to the North Sea. Journal of Plankton Research 22, 923–937.Google Scholar
Gollasch, S, Rosenthal, H, Botnen, H et al. (2000b). Fluctuations of zooplankton taxa in ballast water during short-term and long-term ocean-going voyages. International Review of Hydrobiology 85, 597–608.Google Scholar
Guiry, MD, Guiry, GM (2018). AlgaeBase. Worldwide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. www.algaebase.orgGoogle Scholar
Gurevitch, J, Padilla, DK (2004). Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19, 470–474.Google Scholar
Hadfield, MG (1999). Macrofouling processes: a developmental and evolutionary perspective. In: Book of Abstracts. International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling, Melbourne, Australia, p. 27 (unpublished).Google Scholar
Hallegraeff, GM (1992). Harmful algal blooms in the Australian region. Marine Pollution Bulletin 25, 186–190.Google Scholar
Hallegraeff, GM (1993). A review of harmful algal blooms and their apparent global increase. Phycologia 32, 79–99.Google Scholar
Hallegraeff, GM (1998). Transport of toxic dinoflagellates via ships ballast water: bioeconomic risk assessment and efficacy of possible ballast water management strategies. Marine Ecology Progress Series 168, 297–309.Google Scholar
Hallegraeff, GM, Bolch, CJ (1991). Transport of toxic dinoflagellate cysts via ships’ ballast water. Marine Pollution Bulletin 22, 27–30.Google Scholar
Hallegraeff, GM, Bolch, CJ (1992). Transport of diatom and dinoflagellate resting spores in ships' ballast water: implications for plankton biogeography and aquaculture. Journal of Plankton Research 14, 1067–1084.Google Scholar
Hallegraeff, GM, Gollasch, S (2008). Anthropogenic introductions of microalgae. In: Granéli, E, Turner, JT, eds., Ecology of Harmful Algae. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 379–390.Google Scholar
Hanyuda, T, Hansen, GI, Kawai, H (2018). Genetic identification of macroalgal species on Japanese tsunami marine debris and genetic comparisons with their wild populations. Marine Pollution Bulletin 132, 74–81.Google Scholar
Hay, CH, Luckens, PA (1987). The Asian kelp Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyta: Laminariales) found in a New Zealand Harbour. New Zealand Journal of Botany 25, 329–332.Google Scholar
Heersink, A, Paini, D, Caley, P, Barry, S (2014). Asian Green Mussel: Estimation of Approach Rate and Probability of Invasion via Biofouling. Research Services Final Report. Bruce: Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre.Google Scholar
Herborg, L-M, Rushton, SP, Clare, AS, Bentley, MG (2005). The invasion of the Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) in the United Kingdom and its comparison to continental Europe. Biological Invasions 7, 959–968.Google Scholar
Herborg, L-M, Weetman, D, Van Ooosterhout, C, Hänfling, B (2007). Genetic population structure and contemporary dispersal patterns of a recent European invader, the Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis. Molecular Ecology 16, 231–242.Google Scholar
Hewitt, CL, Campbell, ML (2007). Mechanisms for the prevention of marine bioinvasions for better biosecurity. Marine Pollution Bulletin 55, 395–401.Google Scholar
Hewitt, C, Gollasch, S, Minchin, D (2009). The vessel as a vector – biofouling, ballast water and sediments. In: Rilov, G., Crooks, J, eds., Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 117–131.Google Scholar
Hewitt, C, Campbell, M, Coutts, A, Rawlinson, N (2011). Vessel Fouling Risk Assessment. Canberra: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.Google Scholar
Hutchings, PA, Hilliard, RW, Coles, SL (2002) Species introductions and potential for marine pest invasions into tropical marine communities, with special reference to Indo-Pacific. Pacific Science 56, 223–233.Google Scholar
Hutchins, LW (1952). Species recorded from fouling. In: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Marine Fouling and Its Prevention. Annapolis, MD: United States Naval Institute, pp. 165–207.Google Scholar
IMO (2009). Ballast Water Management Convention and the Guidelines for Its Implementation. 2009 Edition. London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
IMO (2012a). Guidelines for the Control and Management of Ships’ Biofouling to Minimize the Transfer of Invasive Aquatic Species. 2012 Edition. London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
IMO (2012b). Guidance for Minimizing the Transfer of Invasive Aquatic Species as Biofouling (Hull Fouling) for Recreational Craft. MEPC.1/Circ. 792. London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
Inglis, GJ, Floerl, O, Ayhong, S et al. (2010). The Biosecurity Risks Associated with Biofouling on International Vessels Arriving in New Zealand: Summary of the Patterns and Predictors of Fouling. Wellington: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.Google Scholar
Invasive Species Advisory Committee (2005). Progress Report on Meeting the Invasive Species Challenge: National Invasive Species Management Plan. Washington, DC: Invasive Species Advisory Committee.Google Scholar
IUCN (2017). Invasive species: what is an invasive alien species? International Union for Conservation of Nature. www.iucn.org/theme/species/our-work/invasive-speciesGoogle Scholar
James, K, Shears, NT (2016). Proliferation of the invasive kelp Undaria pinnatifida at aquaculture sites promotes spread to coastal reefs. Biological Invasions 17, 3393–3408.Google Scholar
Johnston, EL (2007). Biological invasions and pollution. In: Connell, SD, Gillanders, BM, eds., Marine Ecology. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, p. 581.Google Scholar
Johnston, EL, Keough, MJ (2000). Field assessment of effects of timing and frequency of copper pulses on settlement of sessile marine invertebrates. Marine Biology 137, 1017–1029.Google Scholar
Johnston, EL, Keough, MJ (2002) Direct and indirect effects of repeated pollution events on marine hard substrate assemblages. Ecological Applications 12, 1212–1228.Google Scholar
Johnston, EL, Dafforn, KA, Clark, GF, Rius, M, Floerl, O (2017). How anthropogenic activities affect the establishment and spread of non-indigenous species post-arrival. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 55, 389–420.Google Scholar
Jousson, O, Pawlowski, J, Zaninetti, L et al. (2000). Invasive alga reaches California. Nature 408, 157–158.Google Scholar
Keough, MJ, Ross, J (1999) Introduced fouling species in Port Phillip Bay. In: Hewitt, CL, Campbell, ML, Thresher, RE, Martin, RB, eds., Marine Biological Invasions of Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. Centre for Research on Introduced Marine Pests, Technical Report No. 20. Hobart: CSIRO Marine Research, pp. 193–226.Google Scholar
King, RJ, Black, JH, Ducker, SC (1971). Intertidal ecology of Port Phillip Bay with systematic list of plants and animals. Memoirs of the National Museum of Victoria 32, 93–128.Google Scholar
Kochmann, J, Carlsson, J, Crowe, TP, Mariani, S (2012). Genetic evidence for the uncoupling of local aquaculture activities and a population of an invasive species – a case study of Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas). Journal of Heredity 103, 661–671.Google Scholar
Kolar, CS, Lodge, DM (2001). Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 199–204.Google Scholar
Leão, Z, Kikuchi, R, Ferreira, B et al. (2016). Brazilian coral reefs in a period of global change: a synthesis. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography 64, 97–116.Google Scholar
Lewis, JA (1998). Marine biofouling and its prevention on underwater surfaces. Materials Forum 22, 41–61.Google Scholar
Lewis, JA (1999). A review of the occurrence of exotic macroalgae in southern Australia, with emphasis on Port Phillip Bay. In: Hewitt, CL, Campbell, ML, Thresher, RE, Martin, RB, eds., Marine Biological Invasions of Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. Centre for Research on Introduced Marine Pests, Technical Report No. 20. Hobart: CSIRO Marine Research, pp. 61–87.Google Scholar
Lewis, JA (2002a). Hull Fouling as a Vector for the Translocation of Marine Organisms: Report 1 – Hull Fouling Research. Ballast Water Research Series Report No. 14. Canberra: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.Google Scholar
Lewis, JA (2002b). Hull Fouling as a Vector for the Translocation of Marine Organisms: Report 2 – The Significance of the Prospective Ban on Tributyltin Antifouling Paints on the Introduction and Translocation of Marine Pests in Australia. Ballast Water Research Series Report No. 15. Canberra: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.Google Scholar
Lewis, JA (2016). Ship biofouling: what are the biosecurity risks? 18th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling, Toulon, France, June 2016. Unpublished poster.Google Scholar
Lewis, JA, Coutts, ADM (2009). Biofouling invasions. In: Dürr, S, Thomason, J, eds., Biofouling. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 348–365.Google Scholar
Lewis, JA, Smith, BS, Taylor, RJ, Batten, JJ (1988). Fouling of RAN seawater systems and a comparison of electrochemical control methods. 8th Inter-Naval Corrosion Conference, Plymouth, UK, April 1988, Paper No. 7.Google Scholar
Lewis, JA, Watson, C, ten Hove, HA (2006). Establishment of the Caribbean serpulid tubeworm Hydroides sanctaecrucis Krøyer [in] Mörch, 1863, in northern Australia. Biological Invasions 8, 665–671.Google Scholar
Lewis, PN, Riddle, MJ, Smith, SDA (2005). Assisted passage or passive drift: a comparison of alternative transport mechanisms for non-indigenous coastal species into the Southern Ocean. Antarctic Science 17, 183–191.Google Scholar
Lezzi, M, Del Pasqua, M, Pierri, C, Giangrande, A (2018). Seasonal non-indigenous species succession in a marine macrofouling community. Biological Invasions 20, 937–961.Google Scholar
Lockhart, SJ, Ritz, DA (2001). Preliminary observations of the feeding periodicity and selectivity of the introduced seastar, Asterias amurensis (Lutken), in Tasmania, Australia. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 135, 25–33.Google Scholar
Lowe, S, Browne, M, Boujelas, S, De Poorter, M (2000). 100 of the World’s West Invasive Alien Species. A Selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. Published by the Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) a specialist group of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN). Auckland: ISSG Office.Google Scholar
MacDougall, AS, Turkington, R (2005). Are invasive species the drivers or passengers of change in degraded ecosystems? Ecology 86, 42–55.Google Scholar
Makino, W, Miura, O, Kaiser, F, Geffray, M, Katsube, T, Urabe, J (2018). Evidence of multiple introductions and genetic admixture of the Asian brush-clawed crab Hemigrapsus takanoi (Decapoda: Brachyura: Varunidae) along the Northern European coast. Biological Invasions 20, 825–842.Google Scholar
Mantelatto, MC, Creed, JC, Mourão, GG, Migotto, AE, Lindner, A (2011). Range expansion of the invasive corals Tubastraea coccinea and Tubastraea tagusensis in the southwest Atlantic. Coral Reefs 30, 397.Google Scholar
McCarthy, SA, Khambaty, FM (1994). International dissemination of epidemic Vibrio cholerae by cargo ship ballast and other nonpotable waters. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60, 2597–2601.Google Scholar
McCarthy, SA, Mcphearson, RM, Guarino, AM, Gaines, JL (1992). Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae 01 and cargo ships entering Gulf of Mexico. Lancet 339, 624–625.Google Scholar
McCollin, T, Shanks, AM, Dunn, J (2008). Changes in abundance and diversity after ballast water exchange in regional seas. Marine Pollution Bulletin 56, 834–844.Google Scholar
McMinn, A, Hallegraeff, GM, Thomson, P, Jenkinson, AV, Heijnis, H (1997). Cyst and radionucleotide evidence for the introduction of the toxic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum into Tasmanian waters. Marine Ecology Progress Series 161, 165–172.Google Scholar
Meinesz, A (1999). Killer Algae. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, AW, Davidson, IC, Minton, MS et al. (2018). Evaluation of wetted surface area of commercial ships as biofouling habitat flux to the United States. Biological Invasions 20, 1977–1990.Google Scholar
Minchin, D (2002). Shipping: global changes and management of bioinvasions. In: Briand, F, ed., Alien Marine Organisms Introduced by Ships in the Mediterranean and Black Seas. CIESM Workshop Monographs No. 20. Monaco: CIESM, pp. 99–102.Google Scholar
Minchin, D, Gollasch, S (2003). Fouling and ships’ hulls: how changing circumstances and spawning events may result in the spread of exotic species. Biofouling 19, 111–122.Google Scholar
Minchin, D, Floerl, O, Savini, D, Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A (2006). Small craft and the spread of exotic species. In: Davenport, J, Davenport, JL, eds., The Ecology of Transportation: Managing Mobillity for the Environment. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 99–118.Google Scholar
Mineur, F, Belsher, T, Johnson, MP, Maggs, CA, Verlaque, M (2007a). Experimental assessment of oyster transfers as a vector for macroalgal introductions. Biological Conservation 137, 237–247.Google Scholar
Mineur, F, Johnson, M., Maggs, CA, Stegenga, H (2007b). Hull fouling on commercial ships as a vector of macroalgal introduction. Marine Biology 151, 1299–1307.Google Scholar
Mineur, F, Le Roux, A, Maggs, CA, Verlaque, M (2014). Positive feedback loop between introductions of non-native marine species and cultivation of oysters in Europe. Conservation Biology 28, 1667–1676.Google Scholar
Minton, MS, Verling, E, Miller, AW, Ruiz, GM (2005). Reducing propagule supply and coastal invasions via ships: effects of emerging strategies. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3, 304–308.Google Scholar
Mohammad-Noor, N, Adam, A, Lim, PT et al. (2018). First report of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) caused by Alexandrium tamiyavanichii in Kuantan Port, Pahang, East Coast of Malaysia. Phycological Research 66, 37–44.Google Scholar
Molino, PJ, Wetherbee, R (2008). The biology of biofouling diatoms and their role in the development of microbial slimes. Biofouling 24, 365–379.Google Scholar
Molino, PJ, Campbell, E, Wetherbee, R (2009). Development of the initial diatom microfouling layer on antifouling and fouling-release surfaces in temperate and tropical Australia. Biofouling 25, 685–694.Google Scholar
Moreira, PL, Ribeiro, FV, Creed, JC (2014). Control of invasive marine invertebrates: an experimental evaluation of the use of low salinity for managing pest corals (Tubastraea spp.). Biofouling 30, 639–650.Google Scholar
Morris, JAJ, Whitfield, PE (2009). Biology, Ecology, Control and Management of the Invasive Indo-Pacific Lionfish: An Updated Integrated Assessment. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 99. Beaufort, NC: NOAA.Google Scholar
Moser, CS, Wier, TP, Grant, JF et al. (2016). Quantifying the total wetted surface area of the world fleet: a first step in determining the potential extent of ships’ biofouling. Biological Invasions 18, 265–277.Google Scholar
Moser, CS, Wier, TP, First, MR et al. (2017). Quantifying the extent of niche areas in the global fleet of commercial ships: the potential for ‘super-hot spots’ of biofouling. Biological Invasions 19, 1745–1759.Google Scholar
MPI (2014). Craft Risk Management Standard: Biofouling on vessels arriving to New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry for Primary Industries.Google Scholar
MPI (2016). Import Health Standard: Ballast Water from All Countries. New Zealand Government Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington: Ministry for Primary Industries.Google Scholar
Murray, CC, Gartner, H, Gregr, EJ et al. (2014). Spatial distribution of marine invasive species: environmental, demographic and vector drivers. Diversity and Distributions 20, 824–836.Google Scholar
Nawrot, R, Chattopadhyay, D, Zuschin, M (2015). What guides invasion success? Ecological correlates of arrival, establishment and spread of Red Sea bivalves in the Mediterranean Sea. Diversity and Distributions 21, 1075–1086.Google Scholar
Ojaveer, H, Olenin, S. Naršcius, A et al. (2017). Dynamics of biological invasions and pathways over time: a case study of a temperate coastal sea. Biological Invasions 19, 799–813.Google Scholar
Ostenfeld, CH (1908). On the immigration of Biddulphia sinensis Grev. and its occurrence in the North Sea during 1903–1907 and on its use for the study of the direction and rate of flow of the currents. Meddelelser fra Kommissionen for Danmarks Fiskeri- og Havundersøgelser: Serie Plankton 6, 1–44.Google Scholar
Otani, M (2006). Important vectors for marine organisms unintentionally introduced to Japanese waters. In: Koike, F, Clout, MN, Kawamichi, M, De Poorter, M, Iwatsuki, K, eds., Assessment and Control of Biological Invasion Risks. Kyoto and Gland: Shoukadoh Booksellers and IUCN, pp. 92–103.Google Scholar
Otani, M, Willan, RC (2017). Osaka Bay in Japan as a model for investigating the factors controlling temporal and spatial persistence among introduced marine and brackish species in a heavily industrialized harbor. Sessile Organisms 34, 28–37.Google Scholar
Otani, M, Oumi, T, Uwai, S et al. (2007). Occurrence and diversity of barnacles on international ships visiting Osaka Bay, Japan, and the risk of their introduction. Biofouling 23, 277–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Padilla, DK, Williams, SL (2004). Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as sources of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2, 131–138.Google Scholar
Parry, GD, Hirst, AJ (2016). Decadal decline in demersal fish biomass coincident with a prolonged drought and the introduction of an exotic starfish. Marine Ecology Progress Series 544, 37–52.Google Scholar
Parry, GD, Heislers, S, Werner, G (2004). Changes in the Distribution and Abundance of Asterias amurensis in Port Phillip Bay 1999–2003. Queenscliff: Primary Industries Research Victoria.Google Scholar
Pettengill, JB, Wendt, DE, Schug, MD, Hadfield, MG (2007) Biofouling likely serves as a major mode of dispersal for the polychaete tubeworm Hydroides elegans as inferred form microsatellite loci. Biofouling 23, 161–169.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D, Lach, L, Zuniga, R, Morrison, D (2000). Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50, 53–65.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D, Zuniga, R, Morrison, D (2005). Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52, 273–288.Google Scholar
Piola, RF, McDonald, JI (2012). Marine biosecurity: the importance of awareness, support and cooperation in managing a successful incursion response. Marine Pollution Bulletin 64, 1766–1773.Google Scholar
Polte, P, Buschbaum, C (2008). Native pipefish Entelurus aequoreus are promoted by the introduced seaweed Sargassum muticum in the northern Wadden Sea, North Sea. Aquatic Biology 3, 11–18.Google Scholar
Precht, WF, Hickerson, EL, Schmahl, GP, Aronson, RB (2014). The invasive coral Tubastraea coccinea (Lesson, 1829): implications for natural habitats in the Gulf of Mexico and the Florida Keys. Gulf of Mexico Science 2014, 55–59.Google Scholar
Provan, J, Murphy, S, Maggs, CA (2005). Tracking the invasive history of the green alga Codium fragile ssp tomentosoides. Molecular Ecology 14, 189–194.Google Scholar
Purcell, JE, Shiganova, TA, Decker, MB, Houde, ED (2001). The ctenophore Mnemiopsis in native and exotic habitats: U.S. estuaries versus the Black Sea basin. Hydrobiologia 451, 145–176.Google Scholar
Pyefinch, KA, Downing, FS (1949). Notes on the general biology of Tubularia Larynx Ellis & Solander. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 28, 21–43.Google Scholar
Railkin, AI (2004). Marine Biofouling: Colonization Processes and Defenses. Ganf, TA, Manylov, OG (translators). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Rainer, SF (1995) Potential for the Introduction and Translocation of Exotic Species by Hull Fouling: A Preliminary Assessment. Centre for Research on Introduced Marine Pests, Technical Report No. 1. Hobart: CSIRO Marine Research.Google Scholar
Reed, RH, Moffat, L (1983). Copper toxicity and copper tolerance in Enteromorpha compressa (L.) Grev. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 69, 85–103.Google Scholar
Richardson, DM, Pyšek, P (2006). Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Progress in Physical Geography 30, 409–431.Google Scholar
Richmond, CA, Seed, R (1991). A review of marine macrofouling communities with special reference to animal fouling. Biofouling 3, 151–168.Google Scholar
Rilov, G, Galil, B (2009). Marine bioinvasions in the Mediterranean Sea – history, distribution and ecology. In: Rilov, G, Crooks, JA, eds., Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 549–575.Google Scholar
Riul, P, Targino, CH, Júnior, LAC et al. (2013). Invasive potential of the coral Tubastraea coccinea in the southwest Atlantic. Marine Ecology Progress Series 480, 73–81.Google Scholar
Rius, M, Heasman, KG, McQuaid, CD (2011). Long-term coexistence of non-indigenous species in aquaculture facilities. Marine Pollution Bulletin 62, 2395–2403.Google Scholar
Rius, M, Turon, X, Bernardi, G, Volckaert, F, Viard, F (2015). Marine invasion genetics: from spatio-temporal patterns to evolutionary outcomes. Biological Invasions 17, 869–885.Google Scholar
Rivero, NK, Dafforn, KA, Coleman, MA, Johnston, EL (2013). Environmental and ecological changes associated with a marina. Biofouling 29, 803–815.Google Scholar
Robinson, TB, Griffitths, CL, McQuaid, CD, Rius, M (2005). Marine alien species of South Africa – status and impacts. African Journal of Marine Science 27, 297–306.Google Scholar
Rodgers, SKU, Cox, EF (1999). Rate of spread of introduced rhodophytes Kappaphycus alvarez, Kappaphycus striatum, and Gracilaria salicornia and their current distributions in Kane’ohe Bay, O'ahu, Hawai’i. Pacific Science 53, 232–241.Google Scholar
Ross, DJ, Johnson, CR, Hewitt, CL (2002). Impact of introduced seastars Asterias amurensis on survivorship of juvenile commercial bivalves Fulvia tenuicostata. Marine Ecology Progress Series 241, 99–112.Google Scholar
Roughgarden, J (1986). Predicting invasions and rates of spread. In: Mooney, HA, Drake, JA, eds., Ecology of Biological Invasions of Northern America and Hawaii. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 179–190.Google Scholar
Ruiz, GM, Carlton, JT, Grosholz, ED, Hines, AH (1997). Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by non-indigenous species: mechanisms, extent, and consequences. American Zoologist 37, 621–632.Google Scholar
Ruiz, GM, Rawlings, TK, Dobbs, FC et al. (2000). Global spread of microorganisms by ships. Nature 408, 49–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz, GM, Fofonoff, PW, Steves, BP, Carlton, JT (2015). Invasion history and vector dynamics in coastal marine ecosystems: a North American perspective. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 18, 299–311.Google Scholar
Russ, GR, Wake, LV (1975). A Manual of the Principal Australian Marine Fouling Organisms. Report 644. Maribyrnong: Australian Defence Scientific Service.Google Scholar
Russell, G, Morris, OP (1973). Ship-fouling as an evolutionary process. In: Acker, RF, Floyd Brown, B, DePalma, JR, Iverson, WP, eds., Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling, Gaithersburg, Maryland, October 2–6, 197. Gaithursburg, MD: National Bureau of Standards, pp. 719–730.Google Scholar
Russell, JC, Blackburn, TM (2017). The rise of invasive species denialism. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32, 3–6.Google Scholar
Sammarco, PW, Porter, SA, Cairns, SD (2010). A new coral species introduced into the Atlantic Ocean – Tubastraea micranthus (Ehrenberg, 1834) (Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Scleractinia): an invasive threat? Aquatic Invasions 5, 131–140.Google Scholar
Sammarco, PW, Porter, SA, Genazzio, M, Sinclair, J (2015). Success in competition for space in two invasive coral species in the western Atlantic – Tubastraea micranthus and T. coccinea. PLoS ONE 10(12), e0144581.Google Scholar
Santagata, S, Gasiunaite, ZR, Verling, E et al. (2008). Effect of osmotic shock as a management strategy to reduce transfers of non-indigenous species among low-salinity ports by ships. Aquatic Invasions 3, 61–76.Google Scholar
Saunders, GW, Withall, RD (2006). Collections of the invasive species Grateloupia turuturu (Halymeniales, Rhodophyta) from Tasmania, Australia. Phycologia 45, 711–714.Google Scholar
Sax, DF, Stachowicz, JJ, Brown, JH, Bruno, JF (2007). Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22, 465–471.Google Scholar
Schimanski, KB, Piola, RF, Goldstien, SJ et al. (2016). Factors influencing the en route survivorship and post-voyage growth of a common ship biofouling organism, Bugula neritina. Biofouling 32, 969–978.Google Scholar
Schimanski, KB, Goldstien, SJ, Hopkins, GA, Atalah, J, Floerl, O (2017). Life history stage and vessel voyage profile can influence shipping-mediated propagule pressure of non-indigenous biofouling species. Biological Invasions 19, 2089–2099.Google Scholar
Schultz, MP (2007). Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering. Biofouling 23, 331–341.Google Scholar
Schultz, MP, Bendick, JA, Holm, ER, Hertel, WM (2011). Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship. Biofouling 27, 87–98.Google Scholar
Sherman, CDH, Lotterhos, KE, Richardson, MF et al. (2016). What are we missing about marine invasions? Filling in the gaps with evolutionary genomics. Marine Biology 163, 198.Google Scholar
Shiganova, TA (1998). Invasion of the Black Sea by the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and recent changes in pelagic community structure. Fisheries Oceanography 7, 305–310.Google Scholar
Silva, AG, Lima, RP, Gomes, AN, Fleury, BG, Creed, JC (2011). Expansion of the invasive corals Tubastraea coccinea and Tubastraea tagusensis into the Tamoios Ecological Station Marine Protected Area, Brazil. Aquatic Invasions 6, S105–S110.Google Scholar
Simberloff, DS (1989). Which insect introductions succeed and which ones fail? In: Drake, JA, Mooney, HA, di Castri, F et al., eds., Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 61–67.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D, Schmatz, DC, Brown, TC (1997). Strangers in Paradise: Impact and Management of Non-Indigenous Species in Florida. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Simkanin, C, Davidson, I, Falkner, M, Sytsma, M, Ruiz, G (2009). Intra-coastal ballast water flux and the potential for secondary spread of non-native species on the US West Coast. Marine Pollution Bulletin 58, 366–374.Google Scholar
Soares, MO, Campos, CC, Santos, NMO et al. (2018). Marine bioinvasions: differences in tropical copepod communities between inside and outside a port. Journal of Sea Research 134, 42–48.Google Scholar
Stachowicz, JJ, Byrnes, JE (2006). Species diversity, invasion success, and ecosystem functioning: disentangling the influence of resource competition, facilitation, and extrinsic factors. Marine Ecology Progress Series 311, 251–262.Google Scholar
Stachowicz, JJ, Whitlatch, RB, Osman, RW (1999). Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science 286, 1577–1579.Google Scholar
Stachowicz, JJ, Fried, H, Osman, RW, Whitlach, RB (2002). Biodiversity, invasion resistance, and marine ecosystem function: reconciling pattern and process. Ecology 83, 2575–2590.Google Scholar
Stafford, H, Willan, RC, Neil, KM (2007). The invasive Asian Green Mussel, Perna viridis (Linnaeus, 1758) (Bivalvia: Mytilidae), breeds in Trinity Inlet, tropical northern Australia. Molluscan Research 27, 105–109.Google Scholar
Stebbing, ARD (1981). Hormesis – stimulation of colony growth in Campanularia flexuosa (hydrozoa) by copper, cadmium and other toxicants. Aquatic Toxicology 1, 227–238.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, RD, Edgar, GJ, Stuart-Smith, JF et al. (2015). Loss of native rocky reef biodiversity in Australian metropolitan embayments. Marine Pollution Bulletin 95, 324–332.Google Scholar
Sun, Y, Wong, E, ten Hove, HA et al. (2015). Revision of the genus Hydroides (Annelida: Serpulidae) from Australia. Zootaxa 4009, 1–99.Google Scholar
Sun, Y, Wong, E, Keppel, E, Williamson, JE, Kupriyanova, EK (2017). A global invader or a complex of regionally distributed species? Clarifying the status of an invasive calcareous tubeworm Hydroides dianthus (Verrill, 1873) (Polychaeta: Serpulidae) using DNA barcoding. Marine Biology 164, 28.Google Scholar
Sylvester, F, Kalaci, O, Leung, B et al. (2011). Hull fouling as an invasion vector: can simple models explain a complex problem? Journal of Applied Ecology 48, 415–423.Google Scholar
Takata, L, Falkner, M, Gilmore, S (2006). Commercial Vessel Fouling in California: Analysis, Evaluation, and Recommendations to Reduce Nonindigenous Species Release from the Non-Ballast Water Vector. Report to the California State Legislature. Sacramento, CA: Marine Facilities Division, California State Lands Commission.Google Scholar
Talman, S, Bité, JS, Campbell, SJ et al. (1999). Impacts of some introduced marine species found in Port Phillip Bay. In: Hewitt, CL, Campbell, ML, Thresher, RE, Martin, RB, eds., Marine Biological Invasions of Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. Centre for Research on Introduced Marine Pests, Technical Report No. 20. Hobart: CSIRO Marine Research, pp. 261–274.Google Scholar
Tassin, J, Thompson, K, Carroll, SP, Thomas, CD (2017). Determining whether the impacts of introduced species are negative cannot be based solely on science: A response to Russell and Blackburn. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32, 230–231.Google Scholar
Thomsen, MS, Byers, JE, Schiel, DR et al. (2014). Impacts of marine invaders on biodiversity depend on trophic position and functional similarity. Marine Ecology Progress Series 495, 39–47.Google Scholar
Thomsen, MS, Wernberg, T, Schiel, DR (2015). Invasions by non-indigenous species. In: Crowe, TP, Frid, CLJ, eds., Marine Ecosystems: Human Impacts on Biodiversity, Functioning and Services. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 274–331.Google Scholar
Thresher, RE, Hewitt, CL, Campbell, ML (1999). Synthesis: introduced and cryptogenic species in Port Phillip Bay. In: Hewitt, CL, Campbell, ML, Thresher, RE, Martin, RB, eds., Marine Biological Invasions of Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. Centre for Research on Introduced Marine Pests, Technical Report No. 20. Hobart: CSIRO Marine Research, pp. 283–295.Google Scholar
US Executive Order 13112 (1999). Invasive species. Federal Register 64, 6183–6186.Google Scholar
Utting, SD, Spencer, BD (1997). The Hatchery Culture of Bivalve Mollusc Larvae and Juveniles. Laboratory Leaflet No. 68. Lowestoft: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Vaselli, S, Bulleri, F, Benedetti-Cecchi, L (2008). Hard coastal-defence structures as habitats for native and exotic rocky-bottom species. Marine Environmental Research 66, 395–403.Google Scholar
Verlaque, M, Brannock, PM, Komatsu, T, Villalard-Bohnsack, M, Marston, M (2005). The genus Grateloupia C. Agardh (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) in the Thau Lagoon (France, Mediterranean): a case study of marine plurispecific introductions. Phycologia 44, 477–496.Google Scholar
Vermeij, MJA (2005). A novel strategy allows Tubastraea coccinea to escape small-scale adverse conditions and start over again. Coral Reefs 24, 442.Google Scholar
Viejo, RM (1999). Mobile epifauna inhabiting the invasive Sargassum muticum and two local seaweeds in northern Spain. Aquatic Botany 64(2), 131–149.Google Scholar
Vilà, M, Espinar, JL, Hejda, M et al. (2011). Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecology Letters 14, 702–708.Google Scholar
Visscher, JP (1928). Nature and extent of fouling on ships’ bottoms. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 43, 193–252.Google Scholar
Vitousek, PM (1990). Biological invasions and ecosystem processes: towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies. Oikos 57, 7–13.Google Scholar
Vitousek, PM, Dantonio, CM, Loope, LL, Rejmanek, M, Westbrooks, R (1997). Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 21, 1–16.Google Scholar
Voisin, M, Engel, CR, Viard, F (2005). Differential shuffling of native genetic diversity across introduced regions in a brown alga: aquaculture vs. maritime traffic effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 5432–5437.Google Scholar
Wahl, M (1989). Marine epibiosis. I. Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 58, 175–189.Google Scholar
Wahl, M (1997). Living attached: aufwuchs, fouling, epibiosis. In: Nagabhushanam, R, Thompson, MF, eds., Fouling Organisms of the Indian Ocean: Biology and Control Technology. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, pp. 31–83.Google Scholar
Wallentinus, I (2002). Introduced marine algae and vascular plants in European aquatic environments. In: Leppäkoski, E, Gollasch, S, Olenin, S, eds., Invasive Aquatic Species of Europe: Distribution, Impacts and Management. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer, pp. 27–52.Google Scholar
Walters, LJ, Hadfield, MG, Del Carmen, KA (1997). The importance of larval choice and hydrodynamics in creating aggregations of Hydroides elegans (Polychaeta: Serpulidae). Invertebrate Biology 116, 102–114.Google Scholar
Wasson, K, Fenn, K, Pearse, J (2005). Habitat differences in marine invasions of central California. Biological Invasions 7, 935–948.Google Scholar
Wilcove, DS, Rothstein, D, Dubow, J, Phillips, A, Losos, E (1998). Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States: assessing the relative importance of habitat destruction, alien species, pollution, overexploitation, and disease. BioScience 48, 607–615.Google Scholar
Womersley, HBS (1966). Port Phillip Bay Survey 1957–1963. Algae. Memoirs of the National Museum of Victoria 27, 133–156.Google Scholar
Wood, EJF, Allen, FE (1958). Common Marine Fouling Organisms of Australian Waters. Melbourne: Department of the Navy, Navy Office.Google Scholar
Wu, H, Chen, C, Wang, Q, Lin, J, Xue, J (2017). The biological content of ballast water in China: a review. Aquaculture and Fisheries 2, 241–246.Google Scholar
Zabin, CJ, Ashton, GV, Brown, CW et al. (2014). Small boats provide connectivity for nonindigenous marine species between a highly invaded international port and nearby coastal harbors. Management of Biological Invasions 5, 97–112.Google Scholar
Zabin, CJ, Marraffini, M, Lonhart, SI et al. (2018). Non-native species colonization of highly diverse, wave swept outer coast habitats in Central California. Marine Biology 165, 131.Google Scholar
Zalba, S, Ziller, SR (2007). Manejo adaptativo de espécies exóticas invasoras: colocando a teoria em prática. Natureza & Conservação 5, 16–22.Google Scholar
Zibrowius, H (1971). Les espèces Méditerranéennes du genre Hydroides (Polychaeta Serpulidae): remarques sur le prétendu polymorphisme de Hydroides uncinata. Tethys 2, 691–746.Google Scholar
Zibrowius, H (1973). Remarques sur trois espèces de Serpulidae acclimatées en Méditerranée: Hydroides dianthus, (Verrill, 1873), Hydroides dirampha Mörch, 1863, et Hydroides elegans (Haswell, 1883). Rapports et process-verbaux des réunions Commission international pour l’exploration scientifique de la Mer Méditerranée 21, 683–686.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×