Abrell, J., Ndoye, A., & Zachmann, G. (2011). Assessing the impact of the EU ETS using firm level data (Document de Travail), Bureau d’economie theorique et appliquee. Retrieved from www.beta-umr7522.fr/productions/publications/2011/2011-15.pdfGoogle Scholar

Alberici, S., Boeve, S., van Breevoort, P., & Deng, Y. (2014). Subsidies and costs of EU energy: final report, Ecofys/European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/ECOFYS%202014%20Subsidies%20and%20costs%20of%20EU%20energy_11_Nov.pdf. Last accessed: 11 November 2014.Google Scholar

Alcock, F. (2008). Conflicts and coalitions within and across the ENGO community. Global Environmental Politics, 8(4), 66–91.Google Scholar

Alliance of Energy Intensive Industries. (2012). Position of the alliance of energy intensive industries on the Commission proposal to back-load (set-aside) EU ETS allowances. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/consultations/docs/0017/organisations/unicobre_2_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Altvater, E. (2006). The social and natural environment of fossil capitalism. In Panitch, L. & Leys, C., eds., Socialist Register 2007, London: The Merlin Press, pp. 37–59.Google Scholar

Anderson, B., & Maria, C. D. (2011). Abatement and allocation in the pilot phase of the EU ETS. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48(1), 83–103.Google Scholar

Andreucci, D., García-Lamarca, M., Wedekind, J., & Swyngedouw, E. (2017). “Value Grabbing”: a political ecology of rent. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28(3), 28–47.Google Scholar

Apeldoorn, B. V. (2000). Transnational class agency and European governance: the case of the European Round Table of Industrialists. New Political Economy, 5(2), 157–181.Google Scholar

ArcelorMittal. (2010). Annual Report 2009: Management Report, Luxembourg: ArcelorMittal.Google Scholar

ArcelorMittal. (2011). Annual Report 2010, Luxembourg: ArcelorMittal.Google Scholar

ArcelorMittal. (2013). Annual Report 2012, Luxembourg: ArcelorMittal.Google Scholar

ArcelorMittal. (2015). Annual Report 2014, Luxembourg: ArcelorMittal.Google Scholar

Bachram, H. (2004). Climate fraud and carbon colonialism: the new trade in greenhouse gases. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 15, 5–20.Google Scholar

Bailey, I. (2007). Neoliberalism, climate governance and the scalar politics of EU emissions trading. Area, 39(4), 431–442.Google Scholar

Bailey, I. (2010). The EU emissions trading scheme. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 144–153.Google Scholar

Bailey, I., & Maresh, S. (2009). Scales and networks of neoliberal climate governance: the regulatory and territorial logics of European Union emissions trading. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34(4), 445–461.Google Scholar

Bailey, I., & Rupp, S. (2004). Politics, industry and the regulation of industrial greenhouse-gas emissions in the UK and Germany. European Environment, 14(4), 235–250.Google Scholar

Bailey, I., & Wilson, G. A. (2009). Theorising transitional pathways in response to climate change: technocentrism, ecocentrism, and the carbon economy. Environment and Planning A, 41(10), 2324–2341.Google Scholar

Bakker, K. (2003). An Uncooperative Commodity: Privatizing Water in England and Wales, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bakker, K. (2005). Neoliberalizing nature? Market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(3), 542–565.Google Scholar

Baumert, K. A., Herzog, T., & Pershing, J. (2005). Navigating the Numbers: Greenhouse Gas Data and International Climate Policy, USA: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar

BDI – Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie. (2001). Position paper on green paper on greenhouse gas emissions trading within the European Union. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/docum/0087_en.htmGoogle Scholar

Benton, T. (1989). Marxism and natural limits: an ecological critique and reconstruction. New Left Review, (178), 51–86.Google Scholar

Benton, T. (1992). Ecology, socialism and the mastery of nature: a reply to Reiner Grundmann. New Left Review, (194), 55–74.Google Scholar

Betsill, M. (2002). Environmental NGOs meet the sovereign state: the Kyoto Protocol negotiations on global climate change. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 13, 49–64.Google Scholar

Betsill, M., & Hoffmann, M. J. (2011). The contours of “cap and trade”: the evolution of emissions trading systems for greenhouse gases. Review of Policy Research, 28(1), 83–106.Google Scholar

Bieler, A. (2015). “Sic vos non vobis” (for you, but not yours): the struggle for public water in Italy. Monthly Review, 67(5), 35–50.Google Scholar

Bieler, A., & Morton, A. D. (eds.). (2001). Social Forces in the Making of New Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bieler, A., & Morton, A. D. (2018). Global Capitalism, Global War, Global Crisis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bigger, P. (2017). Hybridity, possibility: Degrees of marketization in tradeable permit systems. Environment and Planning A, Online early. doi:10.1177/0308518X17737786Google Scholar

Bigger, P., & Robertson, M. (2017). Value is simple. Valuation is complex. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28(1), 68–77.Google Scholar

Blok, A. (2011). Clash of the eco-sciences: carbon marketization, environmental NGOs and performativity as politics. Economy and Society, 40(3), 451–476.Google Scholar

Bloomberg New Energy Finance. (2012, January 11). Global carbon market expands 10% in 2011. Retrieved 15 June 2016, from http://about.newenergyfinance.com/about/press-releases/global-carbon-market-expands-10-in-2011/Google Scholar

Bloomberg New Energy Finance. (2014, January 8). Value of the world’s carbon markets to rise again in 2014. Retrieved 10 November 2014, from http://about.newenergyfinance.com/about/press-releases/value-of-the-worlds-carbon-markets-to-rise-again-in-2014/Google Scholar

BNP Paribas Corporate and Investment Banking. (2014). Developing the green economy. Retrieved 18 September 2014, from http://cib.bnpparibas.com/Why_BNP_Paribas/Acting-Responsibly/Developping-the-Green-Economy/page.aspx/171Google Scholar

Böhm, S., & Dabhi, S. (eds.). (2009). Upsetting the Offset: The Political Economy of Carbon Markets, London: MayFlyBooks.Google Scholar

Böhm, S., & Dabhi, S. (2011). Fault lines in climate policy: what role for carbon markets? Climate Policy, 11(6), 1389–1392.Google Scholar

Böhm, S., Misoczky, M. C., & Moog, S. (2012). Greening capitalism? A Marxist critique of carbon markets. Organization Studies, 33(11), 1617–1638.Google Scholar

Böhringer, C. (2014). Two decades of European climate policy: a critical appraisal. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 8(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

Bokhoven, T., Ahmels, P., Blacklock, P., et al. (2001). European Climate Change Programme (ECCP) ensuring its effectiveness – update statement of the clean industry groups, environmental NGOs and academic experts. Retrieved from www.caneurope.org/resources/archive/eu-climate-policy-before-2007/824-2001-mar-eccp-ensuring-its-effectivenessGoogle Scholar

Bond, P. (2012). Emissions trading, new enclosures and eco-social contestation. Antipode, 44(3), 684–701.Google Scholar

Bonefeld, W. (Ed.). (2001). The Politics of Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bontrup, H., & Marquardt, R. (2015). Die Zukunft der großen Energieversorger, Hannover/Lüdinghausen: Greenpeace Germany. Retrieved from www.greenpeace.de/sites/www.greenpeace.de/files/publications/zukunft-energieversorgung-studie-20150309.pdfGoogle Scholar

Bortolotti, B., & Faccio, M. (2009). Government control of privatized firms. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 2907–2939.Google Scholar

Boyd, E., Boykoff, M., & Newell, P. (2011). The “new” carbon economy: what’s new? Antipode, 43(3), 601–611.Google Scholar

Boyd, E., Hultman, N., Timmons Roberts, J., et al. (2009). Reforming the CDM for sustainable development: lessons learned and policy futures. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(7), 820–831.Google Scholar

Boyd, E., & Schipper, E. L. (2002). The Marrakech Accord – at the crossroad to ratification: Seventh Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The Journal of Environment & Development, 11(2), 184–190.Google Scholar

Bracking, S. (2015a). Performativity in the Green Economy: how far does climate finance create a fictive economy? Third World Quarterly, 36(12), 2337–2357.Google Scholar

Bracking, S. (2015b). The anti-politics of climate finance: the creation and performativity of the Green Climate Fund. Antipode, 47(2), 281–302.Google Scholar

Braun, M. (2009). The evolution of emissions trading in the European Union – the role of policy networks, knowledge and policy entrepreneurs. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3–4), 469–487.Google Scholar

Brenner, N. (1998). Between fixity and motion: accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales. Environment and Planning D, 16, 459–482.Google Scholar

Bridge, G. (2011). Resource geographies 1: making carbon economies, old and new. Progress in Human Geography, 35(6), 820–834.Google Scholar

Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., & Eyre, N. (2013). Geographies of energy transition: space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 53, 331–340.Google Scholar

Bryan, D., & Rafferty, M. (2006). Capitalism with Derivatives, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bryan, D., & Rafferty, M. (2013). Fundamental value: a category in transformation. Economy and Society, 42(1), 130–153.Google Scholar

Bryan, D., Rafferty, M., & Jefferis, C. (2015). Risk and value: finance, labor, and production. South Atlantic Quarterly, 114(2), 307–329.Google Scholar

Bryant, G. (2016). Creating a level playing field? The concentration and centralisation of emissions in the European Union Emissions Trading System. Energy Policy, 99, 308–318.Google Scholar

Bryant, G., Dabhi, S., & Böhm, S. (2015). ‘Fixing’ the climate crisis: capital, states and carbon offsetting in India. Environment and Planning A, 47(10), 2047–2063.Google Scholar

Buckley, P. (2017). State of the EU Emissions Trading System 2017. Asking Questions of the Numbers: Leaders and Laggards, Sandbag.Google Scholar

Bullock, S., Childs, M., & Picken, T. (2009). A Dangerous Distraction. Why Offsetting is Failing the Climate and People: The Evidence, Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Retrieved from www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefing_notes/dangerous_distraction.pdfGoogle Scholar

Bumpus, A. G. (2011). The matter of carbon: understanding the materiality of tCO2e in carbon offsets. Antipode, 43(3), 612–638.Google Scholar

Bumpus, A. G., & Liverman, D. M. (2008). Accumulation by decarbonization and the governance of carbon offsets. Economic Geography, 84, 127–155.Google Scholar

Bureau van Dijk. (2014). Orbis database. Retrieved 16 July 2014, from https://orbis.bvdinfo.comGoogle Scholar

Bureau van Dijk. (2017). Orbis database. Retrieved 8 September 2017, from https://orbis.bvdinfo.comGoogle Scholar

Burkett, P. (1999). Marx and Nature, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Burtraw, D., Evans, D. A., Krupnick, A., Palmer, K., & Toth, R. (2005). Economics of pollution trading for SO2 and NOX. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 253–289.Google Scholar

Büscher, B. (2012). Nature on the move: the value and circulation of liquid nature and the emergence of fictitious conservation. New Proposals: Journal of Marxism and Interdisciplinary Inquiry, 6(1–2), 20–36.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (2009). Civilizing markets: carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 535–548.Google Scholar

Camco. (2009, March 2). Why structuring is important for CDM development. Retrieved 6 November 2014, from www.camcocleanenergy.com/blog/why-structuring-is-important-for-cdm-developmentGoogle Scholar

Carbon Markets and Investors Association. (2010). Comitology process on EU-ETS offset standards. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/consultations/docs/0004/registered/cmia_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Carney, M. (2015, September). Breaking the tragedy of the horizon – climate change and financial stability, Speech by Mr Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of England and Chairman of the Financial Stability Board, at Lloyd’s of London, London. Retrieved from www.bis.org/review/r151009a.pdfGoogle Scholar

Cartel, M., Boxenbaum, E., Aggeri, F., & Caneill, J.-Y. (2017). Policymaking as collective bricolage: the role of the electricity sector in the making of the European carbon market: Corporate Engagement in Politics and Governance. In Garsten, C. & Sörbom, A., eds., Power, Policy and Profit: Corporate Engagement in Politics and Governance, Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Carton, W. (2017). Dancing to the rhythms of the fossil fuel landscape: landscape inertia and the temporal limits to market-based climate policy. Antipode, 49(1), 43–61.Google Scholar

Castree, N. (1995). The nature of produced nature: materiality and knowledge construction in Marxism. Antipode, 21, 12–48.Google Scholar

Castree, N. (2003). Commodifying what nature? Progress in Human Geography, 27(3), 273–297.Google Scholar

Castree, N. (2008a). Neoliberalising nature: processes, effects, and evaluations. Environment and Planning A, 40(1), 153–173.Google Scholar

Castree, N. (2008b). Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environment and Planning A, 40(1), 131–152.Google Scholar

Castree, N. (2014). The Anthropocene and geography I: the back story. Geography Compass, 8(7), 436–449.Google Scholar

Castree, N., & Christophers, B. (2015). Banking spatially on the future: capital switching, infrastructure, and the ecological fix. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(2), 378–386.Google Scholar

CDC Climat. (2009). The EU ETS as a cash cow. Tendances Carbone: Monthly Bulletin on the European Carbon Market (35).Google Scholar

CDM Watch. (2011). Climate campaigners hail European ban on industrial gas offsets as an historic victory for environmental integrity. Retrieved from http://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/110121-EU-Member-States-endorse-ban-on-industrial-gas-offsets.pdfGoogle Scholar

CE Delft, & Öko-Institut. (2015). Ex-post Investigation of Cost Pass-Through in the EU ETS: An Analysis for Six Sectors, Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar

CEFIC. (2001). CEFIC position on greenhouse gas emissions trading. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/docum/pdf/0087_business_associations1.pdfGoogle Scholar

Chancel, L., & Piketty, T. (2015). Carbon and Inequality: From Kyoto to Paris, Paris School of Economics.Google Scholar

Chatterton, P., Featherstone, D., & Routledge, P. (2013). Articulating climate justice in Copenhagen: antagonism, the commons, and solidarity. Antipode, 45(3), 602–620.Google Scholar

Chemelot. (2014). Companies: OCI Nitrogen. Retrieved 18 September 2014, from www.chemelot.nl/default.aspx?id=3&template=bedrijf.htm&bid=70&taal=enGoogle Scholar

Chestney, N. (2009a, March 26). Poll-table-EU carbon emissions, price forecasts to 2020. Reuters News. Retrieved from http://uk.reuters.com/article/2009/02/18/carbon-emissions-idUKLG61152420090218Google Scholar

Chestney, N. (2009b, May 29). Concerns mount over EU, U.S. carbon markets link. Reuters. Retrieved from http://uk.reuters.com/article/2009/05/29/btscenes-us-carbon-market-linkage-idUKTRE54S2O320090529Google Scholar

Chestney, N. (2010, January 7). Frustrated carbon traders try other commodities. Reuters, London. Retrieved from www.reuters.com/article/2010/01/07/us-carbon-market-idUSTRE6062SR20100107Google Scholar

Chestney, N. (2011, January 19). Update 3-EU likely to delay 2013 carbon offset ban-sources. Reuters. Retrieved from www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/19/eu-carbon-hfc-idINNLDE70H16M20110119Google Scholar

Chevallier, J. (2012). Econometric Analysis of Carbon Markets, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar

Christiansen, A. C., & Wettestad, J. (2003). The EU as a frontrunner on greenhouse gas emissions trading: how did it happen and will the EU succeed? Climate Policy, 3(1), 3–18.Google Scholar

Christophers, B. (2012). Anaemic geographies of financialisation. New Political Economy, 17(3), 271–291.Google Scholar

Christophers, B. (2013). Banking Across Boundaries: Placing Finance in Capitalism, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Christophers, B. (2016a). For real: land as capital and commodity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(2), 134–148.Google Scholar

Christophers, B. (2016b). Risking value theory in the political economy of finance and nature. Progress in Human Geography, 0309132516679268.Google Scholar

Clark, B., & York, R. (2005). Carbon metabolism: global capitalism, climate change, and the biospheric rift. Theory and Society, 34, 391–428.Google Scholar

Climate Action Network Europe. (2002). No credible climate policy without strong rules. Retrieved from www.climnet.org/resources/archive/doc_download/1207-2002-sep-29cane-ep-no-credible-climate-policy-without-strong-rulesGoogle Scholar

Climate Action Network Europe. (2004). The Directive linking the EU greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme with the Kyoto project mechanisms: NGO briefing on negotiations with Council for a first reading agreement. Retrieved from www.caneurope.org/resources/archive/press-releases/1000-mar-2004-ngo-briefing-the-directive-linking-the-eu-ghg-emissions-trading-scheme-with-the-kp/fileGoogle Scholar

Climate Action Network Europe. (2013). CAN Europe’s contribution to the European Commission’s public consultation on options to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading System. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/docs/0017/organisations/can_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Climate Action Network Europe, WWF Europe, Carbon Market Watch, Greenpeace Europe, & Sandbag. (2014). CAN Europe’s Position on the Market Stability Reserve. Retrieved from www.caneurope.org/docman/emissions-trading-scheme/2486-can-europe-s-position-on-the-market-stability-reserveGoogle Scholar

Climate Experts. (2009). Clean Development Mechanism project design document for “Yingpeng HFC23 decomposition project.” Retrieved from https://cdm.unfccc.int/filestorage/F/5/0/F50UYQ6A971HCGETO3NSPJZ2VK4LWB/CDM_PDD_YINGPENG_v1.5_Apr%2020%202009_clean%20text._1947?t=YzF8bmNvc2s3fDBhIcIP2oFP8mXrg2xPUNceGoogle Scholar

CME Group. (2016). Monthly Energy Review. Retrieved 17 March 2016, from www.cmegroup.com/trading/energy/monthly-energy-review.htmlGoogle Scholar

Coase, R. E. (1960). The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.Google Scholar

Cohen, A., & Bakker, K. (2014). The Eco-Scalar Fix: Rescaling Environmental Governance and the Politics of Ecological Boundaries in Alberta, Canada. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(1), 128–146.Google Scholar

Collard, R.-C., & Dempsey, J. (2013). Life for sale? The politics of lively commodities. Environment and Planning A, 45(11), 2682–2699.Google Scholar

Collard, R.-C., & Dempsey, J. (2017). Capitalist natures in five orientations. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28(1), 78–97.Google Scholar

Cooper, M. H. (2015). Measure for measure? Commensuration, commodification, and metrology in emissions markets and beyond. Environment and Planning A, 47(9), 1787–1804.Google Scholar

Cormier, A., & Bellassen, V. (2013). The risks of CDM projects: how did only 30% of expected credits come through? Energy Policy, 54, 173–183.Google Scholar

Corporate Europe Observatory. (2011). Laughing all the way to the (carbon offset) bank: collusion between DG Enterprise and business lobbyists, Corporate Europe Observatory. Retrieved from http://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/files/article/cdm_ban_delay_final.pdfGoogle Scholar

Council of the European Union. (2013). Press release 3285th Council meeting: agriculture and fisheries. Retrieved from www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/agricult/140120.pdfGoogle Scholar

Cox, P., Simpson, H., & Turner, S. (2010). The Post-Trade Infrastructure for Carbon Emissions Trading: A Report Prepared for the City of London Corporation, London: City of London Economic Development/Bourse Consult.Google Scholar

Dallos, G. (2014). Locked in the Past: Why Europe’s Big Energy Companies Fear Change, Hamburg: Greenpeace Germany.Google Scholar

Damro, C., & Luaces Méndez, P. (2003). Emissions trading at Kyoto: from EU resistance to union innovation. Environmental Politics, 12, 71–94.Google Scholar

de Bruyn, S., Schep, E., & Cherif, S. (2016). Calculation of additional profits of sectors and firms from the EUETS (16.7H44.18), CD Delft.Google Scholar

Delarue, E., Voorspools, K., & D’haeseleer, W. (2008). Fuel switching in the electricity sector under the EU ETS: review and prospective. Journal of Energy Engineering, 134(2), 40–46.Google Scholar

Demeritt, D. (2001a). Scientific forest conservation and the statistical picturing of nature’s limits in the Progressive-era United States. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19(4), 431–459.Google Scholar

Demeritt, D. (2001b). The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91, 307–337.Google Scholar

Dempsey, J. (2015). Fixing biodiversity loss. Environment and Planning A, 47(12), 2555–2572.Google Scholar

Dempsey, J., & Suarez, D. C. (2016). Arrested development? The promises and paradoxes of “Selling Nature to Save It.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(3), 653–671.Google Scholar

Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs. (2003). Commentary on preliminary 1st year results and 2002 transaction log. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130123162956/http:/www.defra.gov.uk/environment/climatechange/trading/pdf/ets-commentary-yr1.pdfGoogle Scholar

Department of Energy and Climate Change. (2011). 2010 to 2015 government policy: energy industry and infrastructure licensing and regulation, Government of the United Kingdom. Retrieved from www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-energy-industry-and-infrastructure-licensing-and-regulation/2010-to-2015-government-policy-energy-industry-and-infrastructure-licensing-and-regulationGoogle Scholar

Department of Energy and Climate Change. (2013). A 2030 framework for climate energy policies: UK Government response to Commission green paper COM(2013) 169 final 1, Government of the United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/consultations/20130702_green_paper_2030_en.htmGoogle Scholar

Descheneau, P. (2012). The currencies of carbon: carbon money and its social meaning. Environmental Politics, 21(4), 604–620.Google Scholar

Descheneau, P., & Paterson, M. (2011). Between desire and routine: assembling environment and finance in carbon markets. Antipode, 43, 662–681.Google Scholar

Domanico, F. (2007). Concentration in the European electricity industry: the internal market as solution? Energy Policy, 35(10), 5064–5076.Google Scholar

Drax Group. (2014). Our history | Drax. Retrieved 13 March 2014, from www.drax.com/about-us/our-history/Google Scholar

Ecofys. (2009). Methodology for the free allocation of emission allowances in the EU ETS post 2012: sector report for the refinery industry, European Commission. Retrieved from www.ecofys.com/files/files/091102_refineries.pdfGoogle Scholar

Economist Intelligence Unit. (2002, October 3). EU industry: emissions trading causing controversy. Economist Intelligence Unit – ViewsWire, p. 94.Google Scholar

Ecorys. (2008). Study on the competitiveness of the European steel sector, European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/metals-minerals/files/final_report_steel_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Ecorys, Öko-Institut, Cambridge Econometrics, & TNO. (2013). Carbon Leakage Evidence Project: Factsheets for Selected Sectors, Rotterdam: Ecorys.Google Scholar

EcoSecurities. (2011). Clean Development Mechanism project design document for “Tianfu coalmine methane project.” Retrieved from http://cdm.unfccc.int/filestorage/K/C/1/KC1PLX0GUDRBJVT2FE4OH5IQY3M9Z7/Tianfu%20revised%20PDD_v6_clean%20110511.pdf?t=eFR8bnIzbXlifDBTjsDPG_BTbd4w4kjr_amgGoogle Scholar

Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., et al. (2014). Technical summary. In Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., et al., eds., Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

EDF Group. (2010). EDF Group position on principles related to “restrictions of carbon credits.” Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/consultations/docs/0004/registered/edf_group_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Egenhofer, C., Alessi, M., Georgiev, A., & Fujiwara, N. (2011). The EU Emissions Trading System and Climate Policy Towards 2050: Real Incentives to Reduce Emissions and Drive Innovation?, Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS).Google Scholar

Ekers, M., & Prudham, S. (2015). Towards the socio-ecological fix. Environment and Planning A, 47(12), 2438–2445.Google Scholar

Ekers, M., & Prudham, S. (2017). The metabolism of socioecological fixes: capital switching, spatial fixes, and the production of nature. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107(6), 1370–1388.Google Scholar

Ekers, M., & Prudham, S. (2018). The socioecological fix: fixed capital, metabolism, and hegemony. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(1), 17–34.Google Scholar

Ellerman, A. D., & Buchner, B. K. (2007). The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: origins, allocation, and early results. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(1), 66–87.Google Scholar

Ellerman, A. D., Convery, F. J., & De Perthuis, C. (2010). Pricing Carbon: The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ellerman, A. D., & Joskow, P. L. (2008). The European Union’s Emissions Trading System in Perspective, Pew Center on Global Climate Change.Google Scholar

Ellerman, A. D., Marcantonini, C., & Zaklan, A. (2016). The European Union Emissions Trading System: ten years and counting. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1), 89–107.Google Scholar

Ellerman, A. D., & Montero, J.-P. (1998). The declining trend in sulfur dioxide emissions: implications for allowance prices. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36(1), 26–45.Google Scholar

Elsworth, R., Worthington, B., & Buick, M. (2011). Der Klimagoldesel: who are the winners of the EU ETS in Germany?, Sandbag. Retrieved from https://sandbag.org.uk/site_media/pdfs/reports/Die_Klimagoldesel_8thNov_ENGLISH_FIN.pdfGoogle Scholar

ENDS Europe. (2012, November 30). CO2 market intervention plan suffers new delay. ENDS Europe. Retrieved from www.endseurope.com/30136Google Scholar

ENDS Europe. (2013, May 7). Nine ministers call for backloading deal by July. ENDS Europe. Retrieved from www.endseurope.com/31680Google Scholar

Enel. (2010a). A view on CDM qualitative restrictions. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/consultations/docs/0004/registered/enel_3_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Enel. (2010b). Enel-Endesa position on CDM qualitative restrictions. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/consultations/docs/0004/registered/enel_1_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Enel. (2014). Report on corporate governance and ownership structure for year 2013. Retrieved from http://www.enel.com/en-GB/doc/report2013/corporate_governance_report_for_year_2013.pdfGoogle Scholar

Energie Agentur NRW. (2010). CO2 emissions per capita in NRW and Germany. Retrieved 27 April 2015, from www.energieagentur.nrw.de/infografik/grafik.asp?RubrikID=3152Google Scholar

Environmental Investigation Agency, & CDM Watch. (2010). HFC-23 offsets in the context of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Retrieved from www.eia-international.org/files/reports199-1.pdfGoogle Scholar

E.ON. (2011). Centrale Emile Huchet. Retrieved from www.eon.fr/content/dam/eon-fr/fr/downloads/Brochures/Entreprise_Sites/Fiche_Emile%20Huchet_V2011_V2.pdfGoogle Scholar

E.ON. (2012). E.ON position on review of the auction time profile for the EU Emissions Trading System. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/consultations/docs/0016/organisation/eon_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

E.ON. (2013a). Connah’s Quay. Retrieved 8 May 2015, from www.eon-uk.com/584.aspxGoogle Scholar

E.ON. (2013b). E.ON answer to consultative communication of the commission green paper “a 2030 framework for climate and energy policies” as of 27th March 2013. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/consultations/20130702_green_paper_2030_en.htmGoogle Scholar

E.ON. (2014a). E.ON Global Commodities. Retrieved 2 October 2014, from www.eon.com/content/eon-com/en/about-us/structure/company-finder/e-dot-on-global-commodities.htmlGoogle Scholar

E.ON. (2014b). Power & carbon. Retrieved 2 October 2014, from www.eon.com/en/business-areas/trading/overview/power-and-carbon.htmlGoogle Scholar

E.ON. (2015a). E.ON facts & figures. Retrieved from www.eon.com/content/dam/eon-com/ueber-uns/publications/EON_Facts_and_Figures_2015.pdfGoogle Scholar

E.ON. (2015b). E.ON history 1923–99. Retrieved 21 March 2015, from www.eon.com/en/about-us/profile/history/1923-99.htmlGoogle Scholar

E.ON. (2015c). Ironbridge. Retrieved 7 May 2015, from www.eon-uk.com/578.aspxGoogle Scholar

E.ON. (2015d). Owned generation. Retrieved 21 May 2015, from www.eon.com/en/business-areas/power-generation/energy-mix/owned-generation.htmlGoogle Scholar

E.ON. (2015e). Schkopau power plant. Retrieved 7 May 2015, from www.eon.com/en/about-us/structure/asset-finder/schkopau.htmlGoogle Scholar

E.ON. (2015f). Scholven power plant. Retrieved 21 March 2015, from www.eon.com/content/eon-com/en/about-us/structure/asset-finder/scholven.htmlGoogle Scholar

Ervine, K. (2013a). Carbon markets, debt and uneven development. Third World Quarterly, 34(4), 653–670.Google Scholar

Ervine, K. (2013b). Diminishing returns: carbon market crisis and the future of market-dependent climate change finance. New Political Economy, 19(5), 723–747.Google Scholar

Ervine, K. (2017). How low can it go? Analysing the political economy of carbon market design and low carbon prices. New Political Economy, 0(0), 1–21.Google Scholar

EURELECTRIC. (2000). Union of the electricity industry – EURELECTRIC position paper on the Commission’s green paper on greenhouse gas emissions trading within the EU (COM 87/2000). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/docum/pdf/0087_business_associations2.pdfGoogle Scholar

EURELECTRIC. (2012). Consultation on the review of the auction time profile for the EU Emissions Trading System: EURELECTRIC response. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/consultations/docs/0016/organisation/eurelectric_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

EUROFER. (2001). EUROFER view on emissions trading – comments to the green paper COM(2000)87. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/docum/pdf/0087_business_associations2.pdfGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2000a). Green paper on greenhouse gas emissions trading within the European Union, COM(2000) 87 final.Google Scholar

European Commission. (2000b). Mandate – working group 1 of the European Climate Change Programme: “flexible mechanisms.” Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/eccp/first/docs/wg1_mandate_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2001a). Chairman’s summary record of stakeholder consultation meeting (with industry and environmental NGOs) 4 September 2001. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/docs/record_of_stakeholder_consultation_meeting_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2001b). Final report: ECCP working group 1 “flexible mechanisms.” Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/eccp/first/docs/final_report_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2001c). Green paper on greenhouse gas emissions trading within the European Union: summary of submissions. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/docum/pdf/0087_summary.pdfGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2003). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Directive establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, in respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s project mechanisms, SEC(2003) 785.Google Scholar

European Commission. (2005). Special rights in privatised companies in the enlarged Union – a decade full of developments (Commission Staff Working Document).Google Scholar

European Commission. (2008). Commission decision concerning the unilateral inclusion of additional greenhouse gases and activities by the Netherlands in the Community emissions trading scheme pursuant to Article 24 of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, C(2008) 7867.Google Scholar

European Commission. (2009). Commission decision instructing the Central Administrator of the Community Independent Transaction Log to enter corrections to the National Allocation Plan table of The Netherlands into the Community Independent Transaction Log, C(2009).Google Scholar

European Commission. (2010a). Draft Commission Regulation of determining, pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, certain restrictions applicable to the use of international credits from projects involving industrial gases. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/news/docs/2010112502_proposal_restrictions_final_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2010b). Questions & answers on emissions trading: use restrictions for certain industrial gas credits as of 2013 (memo/10/615). Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-10-615_en.htmGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2010c). Refining the supply of petroleum products in the EU (Commission Staff Working Document, SEC(2010) 1398 final). Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52010SC1398&from=ENGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2011a). Energy roadmap 2050 (No. COM (2011) 855). Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0885&from=ENGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2011b). Regulation on determining, pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, certain restrictions applicable to the use of international credits from projects involving industrial gases, 550/2011.Google Scholar

European Commission. (2012a). Proportionate Impact Assessment accompanying the document Commission Regulation (EU) No .../.. of XXX amending Regulation (EU) No 1031/2010 in particular to determine the volumes of greenhouse gas emission allowances to be auctioned in2013–2020 (Commission Staff Working Document).Google Scholar

European Commission. (2012b). Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC clarifying provisions on the timing of auctions of greenhouse gas allowances (COM(2012) 416).Google Scholar

European Commission. (2012c). The state of the European Carbon Market 2012 (Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council), Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar

European Commission. (2012d, November 12). Commission submits draft amendment to back-load 900 million allowances to the years 2019 and 2020. Retrieved 4 December 2014, from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/news/articles/news_2012111203_en.htmGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2013a). A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies (Green paper).Google Scholar

European Commission. (2013b). CERs and ERUs surrendered under the EU ETS. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/registry/docs/compliance_2012_ic_en.xlsGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2013c). Commission Regulation establishing a Union Registry pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Decisions No 280/2004/EC and No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Commission Regulations (EU) No 920/2010 and No 1193/2011 Text with EEA relevance, 389/2013.Google Scholar

European Commission. (2013d). Consultation on structural options to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading System [Text]. Retrieved 9 February 2018, from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/consultations/articles/0017_enGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2013e). Options for structural measures to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading System: Main outcomes of the public consultation.Google Scholar

European Commission. (2013f, July 17). State aid: Commission decides on two German support schemes for energy-intensive industries. Retrieved 22 October 2014, from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-704_en.htmGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2014a). A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030 (Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions). Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0015&from=ENGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2014b). Classification of installations in the EUTL Registry based on the NACE 4 statistical classification. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/cap/leakage/docs/installation_nace_rev2_matching_en.xlsGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2014c). Commission Regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 as regards global warming potentials for non-CO2 greenhouse gases, 206/2014.Google Scholar

European Commission. (2014d). Energy efficiency and its contribution to energy security and the 2030 framework for climate and energy policy (Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament And The Council). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/efficiency/events/doc/2014_eec_communication_adopted.pdfGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2014e). European Union Transaction Log. Retrieved 16 July 2014, from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ets/Google Scholar

European Commission. (2014f). Impact Assessment Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A policy framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 up to 2030 (Commission Staff Working Document). Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52014SC0015&from=ENGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2014g). Impact assessment accompanying the document Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading scheme and amending Directive 2003/87/EC (Commission Staff Working Document, SWD(2014) 17 final).Google Scholar

European Commission. (2014h). List of stationary installations in the Union Registry as of 27.02.2014. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/registry/documentation_en.htmGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2014i). Outcome of the October 2014 European Council. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/2030/docs/2030_euco_conclusions_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2014j, January 8). EU Climate Change Committee agrees back-loading. Retrieved 4 December 2014, from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/news/articles/news_2014010801_en.htmGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2014k, April 3). Union Registry. Retrieved 6 March 2014, from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/registry/documentation_en.htmGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2015a). EU ETS Handbook.Google Scholar

European Commission. (2015b). Impact Assessment Accompanying the document Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and lowcarbon investments (No. SWD(2015) 135 final), Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar

European Commission. (2015c, March 26). National allocation plans. Retrieved 16 April 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/pre2013/nap/documentation_en.htmGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2016). The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/publications/docs/factsheet_ets_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2017). European Union Transaction Log. Retrieved 8 September 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ets/Google Scholar

European Commodity Clearing. (2014). Operations. Retrieved 18 September 2014, from www.ecc.de/ecc-en/operationsGoogle Scholar

European Energy Exchange. (2012). EU emission allowances | secondary market. Retrieved 16 June 2015, from www.eex.com/en/market-data/emission-allowances/spot-market/european-emission-allowances#!/2012/02/28Google Scholar

European Environment Agency. (2012, November 29). EUA future prices 2005–2011 [Figure]. Retrieved 8 January 2014, from www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/eua-future-prices-200520132011Google Scholar

European Environment Agency. (2014a). Annual European Union greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2012 and inventory report 2014: executive summary, Copenhagen: European Environment Agency. Retrieved from www.eea.europa.eu/publications/european-union-greenhouse-gas-inventory-2014Google Scholar

European Environment Agency. (2014b). EU ETS data viewer: User manual and background note. Retrieved from www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/european-union-emissions-trading-scheme-eu-ets-data-from-citl-6/eu-ets-data-viewer-manual/eu-ets-data-viewer-manual/at_download/fileGoogle Scholar

European Environment Agency. (2015a, March 19). EEA greenhouse gas – data viewer. Retrieved 17 April 2015, from www.eea.europa.eu/publications/data-and-maps/data/data-viewers/greenhouse-gases-viewerGoogle Scholar

European Environment Agency. (2015b, October 9). EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) data viewer [Page]. Retrieved 18 March 2016, from www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/data-viewers/emissions-trading-viewerGoogle Scholar

European Environment Agency. (2016). Trends and projections in the EU ETS in 2016: The EU Emissions Trading System in numbers (No. 24/2016), Luxembourg.Google Scholar

European Parliament. (2013a). Amendment adopted by the European Parliament on 3 July 2013 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC clarifying provisions on the timing of auctions of greenhouse gas allowances, COM(2012)0416 – C7-0203/2012 – 2012/0202(COD).Google Scholar

European Parliament. (2013b, April 15). Debates – Monday, 15 April 2013 – Strasbourg: revised edition. Retrieved 4 December 2014, from www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=CRE&reference=20130415&secondRef=TOC&language=ENGoogle Scholar

European Parliament. (2013c, April 16). 2012/0202(COD) – 16/04/2013 decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading. Retrieved 4 December 2014, from www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/summary.do?id=1260015&t=e&l=enGoogle Scholar

European Parliament. (2013d, July 3). 2012/0202(COD) – 03/07/2013 text adopted by Parliament, partial vote at 1st reading/single reading. Retrieved 4 December 2014, from www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/summary.do?id=1283730&t=e&l=enGoogle Scholar

European Parliament. (2018, June 2). Climate: MEPs pass law to cut CO2 emissions and fund low-carbon innovation. Retrieved 12 February 2018, from www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20180202IPR97023/climate-meps-pass-law-to-cut-co2-emissions-and-fund-low-carbon-innovationGoogle Scholar

European Parliament and Council. (2003). Directive establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, 2003/87/EC.Google Scholar

European Parliament and Council. (2004). Directive amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, in respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s project mechanisms, 2004/101/EC.Google Scholar

European Parliament and Council. (2008). Directive concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, 2008/1/EC.Google Scholar

European Parliament and Council. (2009). DIRECTIVE 2009/29/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community.Google Scholar

European Parliament and Council. (2014). Consolidated version of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, 2003/87/EC.Google Scholar

European Parliament and Council. (2015). DECISION (EU) 2015/1814 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 6 October 2015 concerning the establishment and operation of a market stability reserve for the Union greenhouse gas emission trading scheme and amending Directive 2003/87/EC, 2015/1814.Google Scholar

European Report. (2002, March 6). Steel – EUROFER slams emission trading rights directive. European Report.Google Scholar

European Round Table of Industrialists. (2001). Response to the European Commission green paper on greenhouse gas emissions trading within the European Union. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/docum/pdf/0087_business_associations1.pdfGoogle Scholar

European Union. (2012a). Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union, C 326.Google Scholar

European Union. (2012b). Consolidated version of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union, C 326.Google Scholar

Eurostat. (2015). Electricity generated from renewable sources. Retrieved 15 May 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tsdcc330&plugin=1Google Scholar

Eurostat. (2017). Electricity production, consumption and market overview. Retrieved 2 March 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Electricity_production,_consumption_and_market_overviewGoogle Scholar

Federal Ministry for Economy Affairs and Energy. (2012). Hintergrundpapier zur sog. Strompreiskompensation, Government of Germany. Retrieved from www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Redaktion/PDF/S-T/strompreiskompensation-hintergrundpapier,property=pdf,bereich=bmwi2012,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdfGoogle Scholar

Federici, S. (2014). Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation, Second, Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia.Google Scholar

Felli, R. (2014). On climate rent. Historical Materialism, 22(3–4), 251–280.Google Scholar

Felli, R. (2015). Environment, not planning: the neoliberal depoliticisation of environmental policy by means of emissions trading. Environmental Politics, 24(5), 641–660.Google Scholar

Felli, R. (2018). Beyond the critique of carbon markets: The real utopia of a democratic Climate Protection Agency. Geoforum. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.031Google Scholar

Fine, B. (2013). Financialization from a Marxist perspective. International Journal of Political Economy, 42(4, Winter), 47–66.Google Scholar

Flåm, K. (2009). Restricting the import of ‘emission credits’ in the EU: a power struggle between states and institutions. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9, 23–38.Google Scholar

Flynn, V. (2013a, April). Major blow for ETS as MEPs reject backloading plan. ENDS Europe. Retrieved from www.endseurope.com/article/31402/major-blow-for-ets-as-meps-reject-backloading-planGoogle Scholar

Flynn, V. (2013b, November 6). German coalition deal on 40% EU CO2 goal. ENDS Europe. Retrieved from www.endseurope.com/33742/Google Scholar

Flynn, V. (2014, March 3). Fault lines emerge in ministers’ 2030 debate. ENDS Europe. Retrieved from www.endseurope.com/35014/Google Scholar

Frame, D. J. (2011). The problems of markets: science, norms and the commodification of carbon. The Geographical Journal, 177(2), 138–148.Google Scholar

Fraser, N. (2014a). Behind Marx’s hidden abode. New Left Review, (86), 55–72.Google Scholar

Fraser, N. (2014b). Can society be commodities all the way down? Post-Polanyian reflections on capitalist crisis. Economy and Society, 43(4), 541–558.Google Scholar

Friends of the Earth Europe. (2013a). Submission on the European Commission’s green paper on a 2030 framework for climate and energy policies. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/consultations/20130702_green_paper_2030_en.htmGoogle Scholar

Friends of the Earth Europe. (2013b, February 19). Dangerous over-reliance on failing EU carbon trading scheme. Retrieved 5 December 2014, from www.foeeurope.org/Dangerous-over-reliance-failing-EUETS-190213Google Scholar

Gan, N. (2018, January 3). Will China’s carbon scheme work without an emissions cap? South China Morning Post. Retrieved from www.scmp.com/news/china/policies-politics/article/2125896/big-black-hole-chinas-carbon-market-ambitionsGoogle Scholar

GDF Suez. (2012). Consultation on review of the auction time profile for the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS): GDF SUEZ answer. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/consultations/docs/0016/organisation/gdf_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

GDF Suez. (2013). GDF SUEZ answer to the public consultation on ETS structural measures.Google Scholar

GDF Suez. (2014). By-laws of GDF Suez. Retrieved from https://www.gdfsuez.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/engie-bylaws-april-28-2015.pdfGoogle Scholar

General Secretariat of the Council. (2014). European Council (23 and 24 October 2014) – conclusions (EUCO 169/14 CO EUR 13 CONCL 5), Brussels: European Council. Retrieved from www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/145397.pdfGoogle Scholar

German Emissions Trading Authority. (2015). German auctioning of emission allowances periodical report: annual report 2014, Berlin: Federal Environment Agency. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/cap/auctioning/docs/ger_report_2014_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Ghosh, S., & Sahu, S. K. (eds.). (2011). The Indian Clean Development Mechanism: Subsidizing and Legitimizing Corporate Pollution, An Overview of CDM in India with Case Studies from Various Sectors, Kolkata: DISHA.Google Scholar

Gilbertson, T., & Reyes, O. (2009). Carbon Trading: How It Works and Why It Fails (Critical currents no. 7), Uppsala, Sweden: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation.Google Scholar

Global Carbon. (2010). Joint Implementation project design document for “installation of CCGT-400 at Shaturskaya TPP, OGK-4, Moscow area, Russia.” Retrieved from http://ji.unfccc.int/UserManagement/FileStorage/KW4VQ6IJ2URMGN0TB8L975PECOF1HSGoogle Scholar

Gore, T. (2015). Extreme Carbon Inequality, Oxfam.Google Scholar

Greenpeace Europe. (2012). Contribution of Greenpeace European Unit, vzw-asbl, to the European Commission consultation regarding the review of the EU ETS auction profile. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/consultations/docs/0016/organisation/greenpeace_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Greenpeace Europe. (2013a). Contribution of Greenpeace European Unit to the European Commission consultation on structural options to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading System. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/docs/0017/organisations/greenpeace_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Greenpeace Europe. (2013b). Submission to the European Commission public consultation on a 2030 framework for climate and energy policies. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/consultations/20130702_green_paper_2030_en.htmGoogle Scholar

Gronwald, M., & Hintermann, B. (eds.). (2015). Emissions Trading as a Policy Instrument: Evaluation and Prospects, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Grubb, M., Vrolijk, C., & Brack, D. (1999). The Kyoto Protocol: a guide and assessment, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Harvey, D. (1995). Globalization in question. Rethinking Marxism, 8(4), 1–17.Google Scholar

Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harvey, D. (2001a). Globalization and the spatial fix. Geographische Revue, 2, 23–30.Google Scholar

Harvey, D. (2001b). Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Harvey, D. (2003a). The New Imperialism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Harvey, D. (2003b). The “new” imperialism: accumulation by dispossession. In Panitch, L. & Leys, C., eds., Socialist Register 2004, London: The Merlin Press, pp. 63–87.Google Scholar

Harvey, D. (2006). The Limits to Capital, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Hatchwell, P. (2016, January 12). EU carbon price rebounds in 2015. ENDS Europe. Retrieved from www.endseurope.com/article/44934/eu-carbon-price-rebounds-in-2015Google Scholar

Hay, C. (1994). Environmental security and state legitimacy. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 5, 83–97.Google Scholar

Heede, R. (2013). Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010. Climatic Change, 1–13.Google Scholar

Hermann, H., & Matthes, F. (2012). Strengthening the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme and Raising Climate Ambition: Facts, Measures and Implications, Öko-Institut for WWF and Greenpeace.Google Scholar

Hervé-Mignucci, M., Wang, X., Nelson, D., & Varadarajan, U. (2015). Slowing the Growth of Coal Power in China: The Role of Finance in State-Owned Enterprises, Climate Policy Institute.Google Scholar

Heynen, N., McCarthy, J., Prudham, S., & Robbins, P. (2007). False promises. In Heynen, N., McCarthy, J., Prudham, S., & Robbins, P., eds., Neoliberal Environments: False Promises and Unnatural Consequences, London; New York: Routledge, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Heynen, N., & Robbins, P. (2005). The neoliberalization of nature: Governance, privatization, enclosure and valuation. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16(1), 5–8.Google Scholar

High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. (2017). Of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Hoffman, N., & Twining, J. (2009). Profiting from the Low-Carbon Economy, McKinsey & Company. Retrieved 12 March 2018, from www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/profiting-from-the-low-carbon-economyGoogle Scholar

Hsiang, S., Kopp, R., Jina, A., et al. (2017). Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. Science, 356(6345), 1362–1369.Google Scholar

Huber, M. (2009). Energizing historical materialism: fossil fuels, space and the capitalist mode of production. Geoforum, 40(1), 105–115.Google Scholar

Huber, M. (2017). Value, nature, and labor: a defense of Marx. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28(1), 39–52.Google Scholar

Huber, M. (2018). Resource geographies I: valuing nature (or not). Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 148–159.Google Scholar

Huber, M. T., & McCarthy, J. (2017). Beyond the subterranean energy regime? Fuel, land use and the production of space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42(4), 655–668.Google Scholar

IETA. (2010, December 14). Statement on EU proposal on qualitative restrictions on offset use in EU ETS. Retrieved 8 December 2014, from www.ieta.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=219:statement-on-eu-proposal-on-qualitative-restrictions-on-offset-use-in-eu-ets&catid=20:press-releases&Itemid=88Google Scholar

Intercontinental Exchange. (2009). List of permitted cover and haircut rates: extension to include emissions allowances. Retrieved from www.theice.com/publicdocs/clear_europe/circulars/C09070.pdfGoogle Scholar

Intercontinental Exchange. (2015). Prohibited list of EUAs, CERs and ERUs. Retrieved from www.theice.com/publicdocs/futures/Prohibited_List_of_EUAs_CERs_ERUs.xlsGoogle Scholar

Intercontinental Exchange. (2016). ICE Clear Europe: Risk Management. Retrieved 11 March 2016, from www.theice.com/clear-europe/risk-management#margins-europeGoogle Scholar

Intercontinental Exchange. (2017). Emissions Futures and Options. Retrieved 24 March 2017, from www.theice.com/emissionsGoogle Scholar

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar

International Emissions Trading Association. (2013). Response to consultation on structural options to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading System.Google Scholar

International Emissions Trading Association. (2015, October 20). 20 Business Groups Call on Governments to include Markets in 2015 Climate Agreement. Retrieved 6 March 2018, from www.ieta.org/page-18192/3766347Google Scholar

International Energy Agency. (2015). Energy and Climate Change, Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar

International Swaps and Derivatives Association. (2015). SwapsInfo 2014 Year in Review. Retrieved from www2.isda.org/images/file_exts/fileext_pdf.pngGoogle Scholar

Jessop, B. (2006). Spatial fixes, temporal fixes and spatio-temporal fixes. In Castree, N. & Gregory, D., eds., David Harvey: A Critical Reader, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 142–166.Google Scholar

Johnson, L. (2013). Catastrophe bonds and financial risk: securing capital and rule through contingency. Geoforum, 45, 30–40.Google Scholar

Johnson, L. (2015). Catastrophic fixes: cyclical devaluation and accumulation through climate change impacts. Environment and Planning A, 47(12), 2503–2521.Google Scholar

Jotzo, F. (2005). Developing countries and the future of the Kyoto Protocol. Global Change, Peace & Security, 17(1), 77–86.Google Scholar

Jotzo, F., Karplus, V., Grubb, M., et al. (2018). China’s emissions trading takes steps towards big ambitions. Nature Climate Change, 8(4), 265–267.Google Scholar

Kama, K. (2014). On the borders of the market: EU emissions trading, energy security, and the technopolitics of ‘carbon leakage’. Geoforum, 51, 202–212.Google Scholar

Kanter, J. (2007, July 6). In London’s financial world, carbon trading is the new big thing. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2007/07/06/business/worldbusiness/06carbon.htmlGoogle Scholar

Kay, K. (2017). A hostile takeover of nature? Placing value in conservation finance. Antipode, Online early. doi:10.1111/anti.12335Google Scholar

Kay, K., & Kenney-Lazar, M. (2017). Value in capitalist natures: an emerging framework. Dialogues in Human Geography, 7(3), 295–309.Google Scholar

Klein, N. (2014). This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs the Climate, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Knox-Hayes, J. (2013). The spatial and temporal dynamics of value in financialization: analysis of the infrastructure of carbon markets. Geoforum, 50(0), 117–128.Google Scholar

Knox-Hayes, J. (2016). The Cultures of Markets: The Political Economy of Climate Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from www.oxfordscholarship.com/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718451.001.0001/acprof-9780198718451Google Scholar

Koch, N., Fuss, S., Grosjean, G., & Edenhofer, O. (2014). Causes of the EU ETS price drop: recession, CDM, renewable policies or a bit of everything? – new evidence. Energy Policy, 73, 676–685.Google Scholar

Koch, N., Grosjean, G., Fuss, S., & Edenhofer, O. (2016). Politics matters: Regulatory events as catalysts for price formation under cap-and-trade. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 78, 121–139.Google Scholar

Krukowska, E. (2011, January 22). EU delays ban on imported CO2 credits by four months. Bloomberg. Retrieved from www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-21/eu-delays-ban-on-imported-co2-credits-by-four-months-update2-.htmlGoogle Scholar

Kuch, D. (2015). The Rise and Fall of Carbon Emissions Trading, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9781137490384Google Scholar

Labban, M. (2010). Oil in parallax: scarcity, markets, and the financialization of accumulation. Geoforum, 41(4), 541–552.Google Scholar

Labban, M. (2014). Against value: accumulation in the oil industry and the biopolitics of labour under finance. Antipode, 46(2), 477–496.Google Scholar

Lane, R. (2012). The promiscuous history of market efficiency: the development of early emissions trading systems. Environmental Politics, 21(4), 583–603.Google Scholar

Lane, R., & Stephan, B. (2015). Zombie markets or zombie analyses? Revivifying the politics of carbon markets. In Stephan, B. & Lane, R., eds., The Politics of Carbon Markets, London: Routledge, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

Le Quéré, C., Moriarty, R., Andrew, R., & Peters, G. (2014). Global carbon budget 2014, Global Carbon Project. Retrieved from www.globalcarbonproject.org/carbonbudget/14/files/GCP_budget_2014_lowres_v1.02.pdfGoogle Scholar

Lederer, M. (2017). Carbon trading: who gets what, when, and how? Global Environmental Politics, 17(3), 134–140.Google Scholar

Levy, D., & Egan, D. (1998). Capital contests: national and transnational channels of corporate influence on the climate change negotiations. Politics and Society, 26, 337–362.Google Scholar

Levy, D., & Egan, D. (2003). A neo-Gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiations. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 803–829.Google Scholar

Leyshon, A., & Thrift, N. (2007). The capitalization of almost everything the future of finance and capitalism. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(7–8), 97–115.Google Scholar

Liu, Q., Tian, C., & Zheng, X. (2016). Climate and Energy Policy Solutions for China: Quantitative Analysis and Policy Recommendations for the 13th Five Year Plan, National Center for Climate Change Strategy and International Cooperation.Google Scholar

Lo, A. (2016). Carbon Trading in China, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9781137529008Google Scholar

Lobell, D. B., Burke, M. B., Tebaldi, C., et al. (2008). Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science, 319(5863), 607–610.Google Scholar

Loftus, A., & March, H. (2015). Financialising nature? Geoforum, 60, 172–175.Google Scholar

Lohmann, L. (2005). Marketing and making carbon dumps: commodification, calculation and counterfactuals in climate change mitigation. Science as Culture, 14(3), 203–235.Google Scholar

Lohmann, L. (2006). Carbon Trading: A Critical Conversation on Climate Change, Privatization and Power, Sweden: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation.Google Scholar

Lohmann, L. (2009). Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: the cases of carbon and cost-benefit. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 499–534.Google Scholar

Lohmann, L. (2010). Uncertainty markets and carbon markets: variations on Polanyian themes. New Political Economy, 15(2), 225–254.Google Scholar

Lohmann, L. (2011a). Financialization, commodification and carbon: the contradictions of neoliberal climate policy. In Panitch, L., Albo, G., & Chibber, V., eds., Socialist Register 2012, Vol. 48, London: The Merlin Press.Google Scholar

Lohmann, L. (2011b). The endless algebra of climate markets. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 22(4), 93–116.Google Scholar

Lövbrand, E., & Stripple, J. (2011). Making climate change governable: accounting for carbon as sinks, credits and personal budgets. Critical Policy Studies, 5(2), 187–200.Google Scholar

Lövbrand, E., & Stripple, J. (2012). Disrupting the public–private distinction: excavating the government of carbon markets post-Copenhagen. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 658–674.Google Scholar

Lovell, H. (2013). Climate change, markets and standards: the case of financial accounting. Economy and Society, 1–25.Google Scholar

Lovell, H., Bebbington, J., Larrinaga, C., & Aguiar, T. R. S. de. (2013). Putting carbon markets into practice: a case study of financial accounting in Europe. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(4), 741–757.Google Scholar

Lovell, H., & Liverman, D. (2010). Understanding carbon offset technologies. New Political Economy, 15(2), 255–273.Google Scholar

Lovell, H., & MacKenzie, D. (2011). Accounting for carbon: the role of accounting professional organisations in governing climate change. Antipode, 43(3), 704–730.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, D. (2009a). Making things the same: gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3–4), 440–455.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, D. (2009b). Material Markets: How Economic Agents are Constructed, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Malm, A. (2013). The origins of fossil capital: from water to steam in the British cotton industry. Historical Materialism, 21(1), 15–68.Google Scholar

Malm, A. (2016). Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Malm, A., & Hornborg, A. (2014). The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 62–69.Google Scholar

Mann, G. (2010). Value after Lehman. Historical Materialism, 18(4), 172–188.Google Scholar

Mann, G., & Wainwright, J. (2018). Climate Leviathan: A Political Theory of our Planetary Future, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Mansfield, B. (2004). Neoliberalism in the oceans: “rationalisation,” property rights, and the commons question. Geoforum, 35, 313–326.Google Scholar

Mansfield, B. (2008). Introduction: property and the remaking of nature–society relations. In Mansfield, B., ed., Privatization: Property and the Remaking of Nature–Society Relations, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Markussen, P., & Svendsen, G. T. (2005). Industry lobbying and the political economy of GHG trade in the European Union. Energy Policy, 33(2), 245–255.Google Scholar

Martin, R., Muûls, M., & Wagner, U. J. (2016). The impact of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme on regulated firms: what is the evidence after ten years? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1), 129–148.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1976). Capital Volume I, London: Penguin Books/New Left Review.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1991). Capital Volume III, London: Penguin Books/New Left Review.Google Scholar

Matthews, K., & Paterson, M. (2005). Boom or bust? The economic engine behind the drive for climate change policy. Global Change, Peace & Security, 17, 59–75.Google Scholar

McAfee, K. (1999). Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17(2), 133–154.Google Scholar

McAfee, K. (2003). Neoliberalism on the molecular scale: economic and genetic reductionism in biotechnology battles. Geoforum, 34(2), 203–219.Google Scholar

McAfee, K. (2015). Green economy and carbon markets for conservation and development: a critical view. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 333–353.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. (2004). Privatizing conditions of production: trade agreements as neoliberal environmental governance. Geoforum, 35(3), 327–341.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. (2013). We have never been “post-political.” Capitalism Nature Socialism, 24(1), 19–25.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. (2015). A socioecological fix to capitalist crisis and climate change? The possibilities and limits of renewable energy. Environment and Planning A, 47(12), 2485–2502.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J., & Prudham, S. (2004). Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum, 35(3), 275–283.Google Scholar

McGlade, C., & Ekins, P. (2015). The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature, 517(7533), 187–190.Google Scholar

McKinsey & Company. (2014). Beyond the storm – value growth in the EU power sector.Google Scholar

Meckling, J. (2011). Carbon Coalitions: Business, Climate Politics and the Rise of Emissions Trading, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Meckling, J., Sterner, T., & Wagner, G. (2017). Policy sequencing toward decarbonization. Nature Energy, 2(12), 918.Google Scholar

Methmann, C. (2013). The sky is the limit: global warming as global governmentality. European Journal of International Relations, 19(1), 69–91.Google Scholar

Mies, M. (1986). Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women and the International Division of Labour, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Milieu, Danish National Environmental Research Institute, & Center for Clean Air Policy. (2004). Comparison of the EU and US approaches towards acidification, eutrophication and ground level ozone, European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/cafe/activities/pdf/case_study1.pdfGoogle Scholar

Millward, R. (2008). Private and Public Enterprise in Europe: Energy, Telecommunications and Transport 1830–1990, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ministry of the Environment. (2013). Communication from the Commission – green paper – a 2030 framework for climate and energy policies: responses by the Government of Poland within public consultations, Government of Poland. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/consultations/20130702_green_paper_2030_en.htmGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, T. (2009). Carbon democracy. Economy and Society, 38(3), 399–432.Google Scholar

Mitterlehner, R., Wathelet, M., Lidegaard, M., et al. (2013, December 23). Call for a renewable energy target in EU’s 2030 climate and energy framework. Retrieved from www.greenpeace.org/eu-unit/Global/eu-unit/reports-briefings/2013/8%20Countries%20Renewable%20letter.pdfGoogle Scholar

Moore, J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Moore, J. W. (Ed.). (2016). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism, Oakland: PM Press.Google Scholar

Moore, J. W. (2017). The Capitalocene, Part I: on the nature and origins of our ecological crisis. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(3), 594–630.Google Scholar

Moore, J. W. (2018). The Capitalocene Part II: accumulation by appropriation and the centrality of unpaid work/energy. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(2), 237–279.Google Scholar

Morris, D. (2012). Losing the lead? Europe’s flagging carbon market, Sandbag. Retrieved from https://sandbag.org.uk/site_media/pdfs/reports/losing_the_lead.pdfGoogle Scholar

Morris, D. (2014). Slaying the dragon: vanquish the surplus and rescue the ETS, Sandbag.Google Scholar

National Development and Reform Commission. (2017, December 18). Program for the establishment of a national carbon emissions trading market (power generation industry). Retrieved from https://chinaenergyportal.org/national-carbon-emissions-trading-market-establishment-program-power-generation-industry/Google Scholar

NEFCO. (2010, September 16). KfW Bankengruppe, NEFCO, Banco Santander and Eolia Renovables conclude carbon finance transaction in Mexico. Retrieved 12 November 2011, from www.nefco.org/news/kfw_bankengruppe_nefco_banco_santander_and_eolia_renovables_conclude_carbon_finance_transactionGoogle Scholar

Nelson, A. (2012, December 11). EU dismisses Polish warnings over carbon market fix. EurActiv. Retrieved from www.euractiv.com/climate-environment/eu-denies-polish-claim-backloads-news-516565Google Scholar

Neuhoff, K., Schopp, A., Boyd, R., Stelmakh, K., & Vasa, A. (2012). Banking of Surplus Emissions Allowances: Does the Volume Matter?, Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research.Google Scholar

Newell, P. (2000). Climate for Change: Non-state Actors and the Global Politics of Greenhouse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Newell, P. (2008). The marketization of global environmental governance. In Park, J., Conca, K., & Finger, M., eds., The Crisis of Global Environmental Governance: Towards a New Political Economy of Sustainability, London: Routledge, pp. 77–95.Google Scholar

Newell, P. (2012). The political economy of carbon markets: the CDM and other stories. Climate Policy, 12(1), 135–139.Google Scholar

Newell, P. (2014). Dialogue of the deaf? The CDM’s legitimation crisis. In Stephan, B. & Lane, R., eds., The Politics of Carbon Markets, London: Routledge, pp. 212–236.Google Scholar

Newell, P., & Paterson, M. (1998). A climate for business: global warming, the state and capital. Review of International Political Economy, 5, 679–703.Google Scholar

Newell, P., & Paterson, M. (2009). The politics of the carbon economy. In Boykoff, M., ed., The Politics of Climate Change: A Survey, London: Routledge, pp. 80–99.Google Scholar

Newell, P., & Paterson, M. (2010). Climate Capitalism: Global Warming and the Transformation of the Global Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, W. D. (2017). Revisiting the social cost of carbon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(7), 1518–1523.Google Scholar

Nye, M., & Owens, S. (2008). Creating the UK emission trading scheme: motives and symbolic politics. European Environment, 18(1), 1–15.Google Scholar

Oberthür, S., & Ott, H. (1999). The Kyoto Protocol: International Climate Policy for the 21st Century, Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

O’Connor, J. (1973). The Fiscal Crisis of the State, New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

O’Connor, J. (1998). Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism, New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Öko-Institut. (2007). WWF background note to the report “Is the CDM fulfilling its environmental objectives? An evaluation of the CDM and options for improvement,” WWF. Retrieved from http://d2ouvy59p0dg6k.cloudfront.net/downloads/cdm_report_wwf_background_paper.pdfGoogle Scholar

Osborne, T. (2015). Tradeoffs in carbon commodification: a political ecology of common property forest governance. Geoforum, 67(Supplement C), 64–77.Google Scholar

Osborne, T., & Shapiro-Garza, E. (2018). Embedding carbon markets: complicating commodification of ecosystem services in Mexico’s forests. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(1), 88–105.Google Scholar

Padis, G. M. (2011). Carbon credits as collateral. Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 16, 343.Google Scholar

Parenti, C. (2012). Tropic of Chaos: Climate Change and the New Geography of Violence, New York: Nation books.Google Scholar

Parenti, C. (2015). The 2013 ANTIPODE AAG Lecture The environment making state: territory, nature, and value. Antipode, 47(4), 829–848.Google Scholar

Patel, R., & Moore, J. W. (2017). A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things: A Guide to Capitalism, Nature and the Future of the Planet, Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Paterson, M. (1996). Global Warming and Global Politics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Paterson, M. (2010). Legitimation and accumulation in climate change governance. New Political Economy, 15, 345–368.Google Scholar

Paterson, M. (2012). Who and what are carbon markets for? Politics and the development of climate policy. Climate Policy, 12(1), 82–97.Google Scholar

Paterson, M. (2014). Governing mobilities, mobilising carbon. Mobilities, 9(4), 570–584.Google Scholar

Paterson, M., & Stripple, J. (2012). Virtuous carbon. Environmental Politics, 21(4), 563–582.Google Scholar

Paulsson, E. (2009). A review of the CDM literature: from fine-tuning to critical scrutiny? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9, 63–80.Google Scholar

Pearse, R. (2016). The coal question that emissions trading has not answered. Energy Policy, 99, 319–328.Google Scholar

Pearse, R. (2017a). Gender and climate change: Gender and climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(2), e451.Google Scholar

Pearse, R. (2017b). Pricing Carbon in Australia: Contestation, the State and Market Failure, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pearse, R., & Böhm, S. (2014). Ten reasons why carbon markets will not bring about radical emissions reduction. Carbon Management, 5(4), 325–337.Google Scholar

Pell, E. H. (2014, January 9). ICE loses carbon trading market share to EEX in 2013. Environmental Finance. Retrieved from www.environmental-finance.com/content/news/ice-loses-carbon-trading-market-share-to-eex-in-2013.htmlGoogle Scholar

PGE Group. (2015). Oddział Elektrownia Bełchatów. Retrieved 24 March 2015, from www.elbelchatow.pgegiek.pl/Google Scholar

Philp, L. (2013). Stranded costs from the demise of the Clean Development Mechanism, CO2 Spain. Retrieved from www.co2spain.com/strandedcosts.phpGoogle Scholar

Pigou, A. C. (1932). The economics of welfare, Fourth edition, London: Macmillan and Co. Limited.Google Scholar

Point Carbon. (2011). ICE maintains zero collateral value for carbon units. Carbon Market Europe, 10(23).Google Scholar

Point Carbon. (2013, June 4). JP Morgan sells EcoSecurities to Mercuria: sources. Point Carbon. Retrieved from www.pointcarbon.com/news/1.2401344Google Scholar

Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation, New York: Farrar & Rinehart.Google Scholar

Presidency of the Republic of France. (2014, February 19). Décisions du Conseil des ministres franco-allemand. Retrieved 16 December 2014, from www.elysee.fr/communiques-de-presse/article/decisions-du-conseil-des-ministres-franco-allemand-frde/Google Scholar

Prudham, S. (2003). Taming trees: capital, science, and nature in Pacific Slope tree improvement. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(3), 636–656.Google Scholar

Prudham, S. (2007). The fictions of autonomous invention: accumulation by dispossession, commodification and life patents in Canada. Antipode, 39(3), 406–429.Google Scholar

Prudham, S. (2009). Commodification. In Castree, N., Demeritt, D., Liverman, D., & Rhoads, B., eds., A Companion to Environmental Geography, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Reuters. (2017, November 15). China’s top climate official rules out carbon futures, tax: media. Reuters. Retrieved from https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-china-climatechange/chinas-top-climate-official-rules-out-carbon-futures-tax-media-idUKKBN1DF03VGoogle Scholar

Reyes, O. (2011). Zombie carbon and sectoral market mechanisms. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 22(4), 117–135.Google Scholar

Robbins, P., & Luginbuhl, A. (2005). The last enclosure: resisting privatization of wildlife in the Western United States. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16(1), 45–61.Google Scholar

Robertson, M. M. (2000). No net loss: wetland restoration and the incomplete capitalization of nature. Antipode, 32(4), 463–493.Google Scholar

Robertson, M. M. (2004). The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum, 35, 361–373.Google Scholar

Robertson, M. M. (2006). The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 367–387.Google Scholar

Robertson, M. M. (2007). Discovering price in all the wrong places: the work of commodity definition and price under neoliberal environmental policy. Antipode, 39(3), 500–526.Google Scholar

Robertson, M. M. (2012). Measurement and alienation: making a world of ecosystem services. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(3), 386–401.Google Scholar

Robertson, M. M., & Wainwright, J. D. (2013). The value of nature to the state. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(4), 890–905.Google Scholar

Rosewarne, S. (2010). Meeting the challenge of climate change: the poverty of the dominant economic narrative and market solutions as subterfuge. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 66, 17–50.Google Scholar

Rosewarne, S., Goodman, J., & Pearse, R. (2014). Climate Action Upsurge: The Ethnography of Climate Movement Politics, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Royal Dutch Shell. (2012). Focus: improving energy efficiency at Pernis refinery. Retrieved 27 April 2015, from http://reports.shell.com/sustainability-report/2012/ourapproach/climatechange/focuspernisrefinery.htmlGoogle Scholar

Russo, E., & Odeska, M. (2009, September). E.ON Carbon Sourcing experience to tackle climate change in Russia, Presented at the Association of European Businesses conference on “Kyoto Protocol Implementation”, Moscow. Retrieved from www.aebrus.ru/upload/iblock/20b/20bc7fb3fbcd6bd9edcabd1abdacc0a5.pdfGoogle Scholar

RWE. (2013). Response to the green paper “a 2030 framework for climate and energy policies.” Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/consultations/20130702_green_paper_2030_en.htmGoogle Scholar

RWE. (2014a). Facts & figures. Retrieved from www.rwe.com/web/cms/mediablob/en/108808/data/114404/54/rwe/investor-relations/presentations-videos/Facts-Figures-2014.pdfGoogle Scholar

RWE. (2014b). Niederaussem power plant. Retrieved 23 September 2014, from www.rwe.com/web/cms/en/60132/rwe-power-ag/locations/lignite/niederaussem-power-plant/Google Scholar

RWE and E.ON. (2001). Summary of the opinion on the EU green paper on the trading of greenhouse gas emission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/docum/0087_en.htmGoogle Scholar

RWE Innogy. (2014). Heidelberg cogeneration plant. Retrieved 23 September 2014, from www.rwe.com/web/cms/en/66030/rwe-innogy/technologies/heidelberg-cogeneration-plant/Google Scholar

RWE Supply & Trading. (2014). Short facts about RWE Supply & Trading. Retrieved 1 October 2014, from www.rwe.com/web/cms/en/111356/rwe-supply-trading/about-rwe-supply-trading/Google Scholar

Salleh, A. (2009). Ecological debt: Embodied debt. In Salleh, A., ed., Eco-Sufficiency and Global Justice: Women Write Political Ecology, London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Salleh, A. (2017). Ecofeminism as Politics: Nature. Marx and the Postmodern, Second edition, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Schmalensee, R., Joskow, P. L., Ellerman, A. D., Montero, J. P., & Bailey, E. M. (1998). An interim evaluation of sulfur dioxide emissions trading. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 53–68.Google Scholar

Schneider, L. (2009). Assessing the additionality of CDM projects: practical experiences and lessons learned. Climate Policy, 9(3), 242–254.Google Scholar

Schneider, L. (2011). Perverse incentives under the CDM: an evaluation of HFC-23 destruction projects. Climate Policy, 11(2), 851–864.Google Scholar

Schneider, L., Lazarus, M., & Kollmuss, A. (2010). Industrial N2O Projects under the CDM: Adipic acid – A Case of Carbon Leakage?, Somerville, MA: Stockholm Environment Institute.Google Scholar

Shell Global. (2008). Cutting deeper into the barrel. Retrieved 27 April 2015, from www.shell.com/global/products-services/solutions-for-businesses/globalsolutions/about-global-solutions/key-projects/pernis.htmlGoogle Scholar

Shell Global. (2015). Products. Retrieved 27 April 2015, from www.shell.com/global/products-services/solutions-for-businesses/shipping-trading/environmental-trading-solutions/products.htmlGoogle Scholar

Shell Netherlands. (2015). The refinery. Retrieved 27 April 2015, from www.shell.nl/nld/aboutshell/shell-businesses/pernis/welkom-shell-pernis/raffinaderij.htmlGoogle Scholar

Skjærseth, J. B., & Wettestad, J. (2008). EU emissions Trading: Initiation, Decision-Making and Implementation, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar

Skjærseth, J. B., & Wettestad, J. (2009). The origin, evolution and consequences of the EU Emissions Trading System. Global Environmental Politics, 9(2), 101–122.Google Scholar

Slater, H. (2017, December 29). China’s carbon market needs ambition. Retrieved 16 April 2018, from www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/10330-China-s-carbon-market-needs-ambitionGoogle Scholar

Smith, K. (2007). The Carbon Neutral Myth: Offset Indulgences for the Climate Sins, Amsterdam: Carbon Trade Watch and Transnational Institute.Google Scholar

Smith, N. (2006). Nature as accumulation strategy. In Panitch, L. & Leys, C., eds., Socialist Register 2007, London: The Merlin Press, pp. 19–41.Google Scholar

Smith, N. (2008). Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space, Third edition, London: Verso.Google Scholar

St Martin, K. (2005). Disrupting enclosure in New England fisheries. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16(1), 63–80.Google Scholar

Stavins, R. N. (1998). What can we learn from the grand policy experiment? Lessons from SO2 allowance trading. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 69–88.Google Scholar

Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., & McNeill, J. R. (2007). The anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8), 614–621.Google Scholar

Steitz, C. (2014, March 4). RWE warns of frugal future after historic net loss. Reuters. Retrieved from http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/03/04/uk-rwe-results-idUKBREA230YD20140304Google Scholar

Stephan, B. (2012). Bringing discourse to the market: the commodification of avoided deforestation. Environmental Politics, 21(4), 621–639.Google Scholar

Stephan, B., & Lane, R. (eds.). (2015). The Politics of Carbon Markets, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Stephan, B., & Paterson, M. (2012). The politics of carbon markets: an introduction. Environmental Politics, 21(4), 545–562.Google Scholar

Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stocker, T., Qin, D., Plattner, G., & Alexander, L. (2013). Technical summary. In Stocker, T., Qin, D., Plattner, G., & Tignor, S., eds., Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–115.Google Scholar

Storbeck, O. (2018, March 11). Eon deal with RWE set to transform German energy sector. Financial Times. Retrieved from www.ft.com/content/9ea7b254-2549-11e8-b27e-cc62a39d57a0Google Scholar

Straw, W., & Platt, R. (2013). Up in smoke: How the EU’s faltering climate policy is undermining the City of London, Institute for Public Policy Research. Retrieved from www.ippr.org/publication/55/11509/up-in-smoke-how-the-eus-faltering-climate-policy-is-undermining-the-city-of-londonGoogle Scholar

Stuart, D., Gunderson, R., & Petersen, B. (2017). Climate change and the Polanyian counter-movement: carbon markets or degrowth? New Political Economy, 0(0), 1–14.Google Scholar

Sullivan, S. (2013). After the green rush? Biodiversity offsets, uranium power and the ‘calculus of casualties’ in greening growth. Human Geography, 6(1).Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (1999). Modernity and hybridity: nature, Regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(3), 443–465.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Dispossessing H2O: the contested terrain of water privatization. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16(1), 81–98.Google Scholar

Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 213–232.Google Scholar

Szabo, M. (2010, August 6). JP Morgan, Gunvor trade 1st 2020 EU carbon futures. Reuters, London. Retrieved from www.reuters.com/article/2010/08/06/carbon-2020-trade-idUSLDE6750YG20100806Google Scholar

Szabo, M. (2012, January 7). CER buyers seek contract rejigs, exits as prices collapse. Point Carbon.Google Scholar

Taylor, M. R., Rubin, E. S., & Hounshell, D. A. (2005). Regulation as the mother of innovation: the case of SO2 control. Law & Policy, 27, 348.Google Scholar

Tietenberg, T. H. (2006). Emissions Trading: Principles and Practice, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar

Timperley, J. (2018, January 29). Q&A: How will China’s new carbon trading scheme work? Retrieved 16 April 2018, from www.carbonbrief.org/qa-how-will-chinas-new-carbon-trading-scheme-workGoogle Scholar

Tol, R. S. J. (2018). Policy brief – leaving an Emissions Trading Scheme: implications for the United Kingdom and the European Union. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 12(1), 183–189.Google Scholar

Uhrig-Homburg, M., & Wagner, M. (2008). Derivative instruments in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme – an early market perspective. Energy & Environment, 19(5), 635–655.Google Scholar

UNEP. (2018). About Montreal Protocol | OzonAction. Retrieved 28 March 2018, from http://web.unep.org/ozonaction/who-we-are/about-montreal-protocolGoogle Scholar

UNEP DTU. (2018a, March 1). CDM Pipeline. Retrieved 28 March 2018, from www.cdmpipeline.org/publications/CDMPipeline.xlsmGoogle Scholar

UNEP DTU. (2018b, March 1). JI Pipeline. Retrieved 12 March 2018, from www.cdmpipeline.org/publications/JiPipeline.xlsxGoogle Scholar

Uniper SE. (2018). Shareholder Structure. Retrieved 29 January 2018, from https://ir.uniper.energy/websites/uniper/English/1400/shareholder-structure.htmlGoogle Scholar

Unipro. (2018). Shaturskaya GRES. Retrieved 29 January 2018, from www.unipro.energy/en/about/structure/shaturskaya/Google Scholar

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1992).Google Scholar

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1995). Global Warming Potentials. Retrieved 7 May 2015, from http://unfccc.int/ghg_data/items/3825.phpGoogle Scholar

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1997). The Kyoto Protocol.Google Scholar

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2001). The Marrakech Accords.Google Scholar

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2014a). Clean Development Mechanism. Retrieved 28 September 2014, from https://cdm.unfccc.int/Google Scholar

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2014b). Joint Implementation. Retrieved 28 September 2014, from http://ji.unfccc.int/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2014c). Yingpeng HFC23 decomposition project. Retrieved 30 September 2014, from https://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/DB/DNV-CUK1215776483.62/viewGoogle Scholar

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2015). The Paris Agreement.Google Scholar

Vattenfall. (2013). Vattenfall’s response to the European Commission’s consultation on options for a structural reform to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS).Google Scholar

Vestreng, V., Myhre, G., Fagerli, H., Reis, S., & Tarrasón, L. (2007). Twenty-five years of continuous sulphur dioxide emission reduction in Europe. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 7(13), 3663–3681.Google Scholar

Victor, D. G., & House, J. C. (2006). BP’s emissions trading system. Energy Policy, 34(15), 2100–2112.Google Scholar

VIK - Verband der Industriellen Energie- und Kraftwirtschaft. (2001). VIK-Position: Primat der Kostensenkung im internationalen Umweltschutz. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/docum/0087_en.htmGoogle Scholar

Visegrad Group. (2014a). Joint statement of the informal meeting of ministers and representatives responsible for climate policy of the Visegrad Group Countries, Bulgaria and Romania. Retrieved from www.mos.gov.pl/g2/big/2014_02/1f2fcbe4313eb55fe0b1c3c4a759b855.pdfGoogle Scholar

Visegrad Group. (2014b). The Visegrad Group Countries, Romania and Bulgaria Joint Paper on the EU climate and energy framework 2020–2030. Retrieved from www.mos.gov.pl/g2/big/2014_05/1ee07c384a09ab47f346d05eac59e11b.pdfGoogle Scholar

Vlachou, A. (2014). The European Union’s Emissions Trading System. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(1), 127–152.Google Scholar

Vlachou, A., & Konstantinidis, C. (2010). Climate change: the political economy of Kyoto flexible mechanisms. Review of Radical Political Economics, 42(1), 32–49.Google Scholar

Vlachou, A., & Pantelias, G. (2017). The EU’s Emissions Trading System, Part 2: a political economy critique. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28(3), 108–127.Google Scholar

Voß, J.-P. (2007). Innovation processes in governance: the development of ‘emissions trading’ as a new policy instrument. Science and Public Policy, 34(5), 329–343.Google Scholar

Wainwright, J., & Mann, G. (2013). Climate Leviathan. Antipode, 45(1), 1–22.Google Scholar

Walhain, S. (2006, January 20). The currency carbon, hard as the Euro. Carbon Market Europe.Google Scholar

Walker, R. (2017). Value and nature: rethinking capitalist exploitation and expansion. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28(1), 53–61.Google Scholar

Wathelet, M., Petersen, R. H., Gabriel, S., et al. (2014, June 17). Call for a proposal on a binding energy efficiency target for 2030 in light of the forthcoming EED review in July 2014. Retrieved from www.eceee.org/all-news/news/news_2014/2014-06-19/letter-to-BarrosoGoogle Scholar

Werksman, J. (1998). The Clean Development Mechanism: unwrapping the ‘Kyoto surprise.’ Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 7(2), 147–158.Google Scholar

Wettestad, J. (2005). The Making of the 2003 EU Emissions Trading Directive: an ultra-quick process due to entrepreneurial proficiency? Global Environmental Politics, 5(1), 1–23.Google Scholar

Wettestad, J. (2009). EU energy-intensive industries and emission trading: losers becoming winners? Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(5), 309–320.Google Scholar

Wettestad, J., & Jevnaker, T. (2016). Rescuing EU Emissions Trading, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar

Wigley, T. M. L. (2011). Coal to gas: the influence of methane leakage. Climatic Change, 108(3), 601–608.Google Scholar

World Bank. (2006). State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2006, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

World Bank. (2008). State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2008, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

World Bank. (2010). State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2010, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

World Bank. (2012). State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2012, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

World Bank. (2014). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2014, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

World Bank. (2015). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2015, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

World Bank. (2016). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2016, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

World Bank. (2017). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2017, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

WWF Europe. (2010). WWF response to the European Commission public consultation on a measure to introduce further quality restrictions on the use of credits from industrial gas projects. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/consultations/docs/0004/registered/wwf_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

WWF Europe. (2012). WWF response to the European Commission public consultation on review of the auction time profile for the EU Emissions Trading System. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/clima/consultations/docs/0016/organisation/wwf_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

WWF Europe. (2013). Response to the European Commission public consultation on a 2030 climate and energy package. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/consultations/20130702_green_paper_2030_en.htmGoogle Scholar

York, R. (2012). Asymmetric effects of economic growth and decline on CO2 emissions. Nature Climate Change, 2(11), 762–764.Google Scholar

Zhu, B., & Chevallier, J. (2017). Pricing and Forecasting Carbon Markets, Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar