Book contents
- The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals
- Studies on International Courts and Tribunals
- The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I
- Part II
- 6 Assessing the International Criminal Court
- 7 How the Fragmentation of the International Judiciary Affects the Performance of International Judicial Bodies
- 8 International Judicial Performances and the Performance of International Courts
- 9 International Courts’ Socialization Strategies for Actual and Perceived Performance
- 10 What Happens after a Judgment is Given? Judgment Compliance and the Performance of International Courts and Tribunals
- 11 Problem-Solving Structure and International Courts and Tribunals: Lessons from the Study of International Regimes
- Part III
- Index
- References
7 - How the Fragmentation of the International Judiciary Affects the Performance of International Judicial Bodies
from Part II
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 March 2018
Book contents
- The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals
- Studies on International Courts and Tribunals
- The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I
- Part II
- 6 Assessing the International Criminal Court
- 7 How the Fragmentation of the International Judiciary Affects the Performance of International Judicial Bodies
- 8 International Judicial Performances and the Performance of International Courts
- 9 International Courts’ Socialization Strategies for Actual and Perceived Performance
- 10 What Happens after a Judgment is Given? Judgment Compliance and the Performance of International Courts and Tribunals
- 11 Problem-Solving Structure and International Courts and Tribunals: Lessons from the Study of International Regimes
- Part III
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals , pp. 234 - 260Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abbott, Frederick M. 2000. “NAFTA and the Legalization of World Politics: A Case Study,” International Organization 54(3): 519–547.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. “The Concept of Legalization,” International Organization 54(3): 401–419.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance,” International Organization 54(3): 421–456.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan. 2013. “Law, Legalization and Politics: An Agenda for the Next Generation of IL/IR Scholars,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–56.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2000. “The European Union’s Legal System and Domestic Policy: Spillover or Backlash,” International Organization 54(3): 489–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2008. “Agents or Trustees? International Courts in their Political Context,” European Journal of International Relations 14(1): 33–63.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2013. “The Multiple Roles of International Courts and Tribunals: Enforcement, Dispute Settlement, Constitutional and Administrative Review,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 345–370.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2014. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, Christian and Rittberger, Berthold. 2013. “The Legalization of Dispute Resolution in Mercosur,” Journal of Politics in Latin America 5(3): 97–132.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Mark. 2014. “Clash of the Treaties: Responding to Institutional Interplay in European Community-Chile Swordfish Negotiations,” European Journal of International Relations 20(4): 987–1013.Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal and Downs, George W. 2007. “The Empire’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law,” Stanford Law Review 60(2): 595–632.Google Scholar
Bezuijen, Jeanine. 2015. “Exploring the Causes for Change in Regional Third Party Dispute Settlement,” World Trade Review 14(1): 59–81.Google Scholar
Bièvre, Dirk de, Poletti, Arlo, and Thomann, Lars. 2014. “To Enforce or Not to Enforce? Judicialization, Venue Shopping, and Global Regulatory Harmonization,” Regulation & Governance 8(3): 269–286.Google Scholar
Brutger, Ryan and Morse, Julia C. 2015. “Balancing Law and Politics: Judicial Incentives in WTO Dispute Settlement,” The Review of International Organizations 10(2): 179–205.Google Scholar
Burley, Anne-Marie and Mattli, Walter. 1993. “Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration,” International Organization 47(1): 41–76.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. 2007. “Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade,” International Organization 61(4): 735–761.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2000. “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Early Settlement in GATT/WTO Disputes,” Fordham International Law Journal 24(1): 158–172.Google Scholar
Carmody, Chi. 2006. “Softwood Lumber Dispute (2001–2006),” The American Journal of International Law 100(3): 664–674.Google Scholar
Charney, Jonathan I. 1999. “The Proliferation of Courts and Tribunals: Piecing Together the Puzzle,” New York University Journal of International Law 31: 697–708.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina L. 2009. “Overlapping Institutions in Trade Policy,” Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 25–31.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole. 2009. “The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case,” International Organization 63(1): 33–65.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2007. All Politics is Global. Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L. 2007. The Many Dimensions of Softwood Lumber. Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Research Paper No. 2007–24. Temple University. Beasley School of Law.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989. The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order Studies in Rationality and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther. 2004. “Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law,” Michigan Journal of International Law 25: 999–1046.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2008. “Review Article: The Mechanismic Worldview: Thinking Inside the Box,” British Journal of Political Science 38(1): 161–179.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Michael, Johns, Leslie, and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2010. “Strengthening International Courts and the Early Settlement of Disputes,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 54(1): 5–38.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2014. “Political Constraints on International Courts,” in Romano, Cesare, Alter, Karen J., and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on International Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 483–502.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2000. “Introduction: Legalization and World Politics,” International Organization 54(3): 385–399.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith and Martin, Lisa L. 2000. “Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Politics: A Cautionary Note,” International Organization 54(3): 603–632.Google Scholar
Gomez-Mera, Laura and Molinari, Andrea. 2014. “Overlapping Institutions, Learning, and Dispute Initiation in Regional Trade Agreements: Evidence from South America,” International Studies Quarterly 58(2): 269–281.Google Scholar
Guglya, L. 2011. “The Interplay of International Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: The Softwood Lumber Controversy,” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2(1): 175–207.Google Scholar
Gutner, Tamar and Thompson, Alexander. 2010. “The Politics of IO performance: A Framework,” The Review of International Organizations 5(3): 227–248.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. 2009. “Regime Shifting in the International Intellectual Property System,” Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 39–44.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2005. “Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo,” California Law Review 93: 899–956.Google Scholar
Henckels, C. 2008. “Overcoming Jurisdictional Isolationism at the WTO-FTA Nexus. A Potential Approach for the WTO,” European Journal of International Law 19(3): 571–599.Google Scholar
Hillman, Jennifer. 2009. “Conflicts between Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO – What Should WTO Do,” Cornell International Law Journal 42(2): 193–208.Google Scholar
Johns, Leslie. 2012. “Courts as Coordinators. Endogenous Enforcement and Jurisdiction in International Adjudication,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 56(2): 257–289.Google Scholar
Jupille, Joseph. 2004. Procedural Politics: Issues, influence, and institutional choice in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jupille, Joseph, Mattli, Walter, and Snidal, Duncan. 2013. Institutional Choice and Global Commerce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 2000. “Legalization as Strategy: The Asia-Pacific Case,” International Organization 54(3): 549–571.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2000. “Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational,” International Organization 54(3): 457–488.Google Scholar
King, David C. 1997. Turf Wars: How Congressional Committees Claim Jurisdiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara and Betz, Timm. 2013. “The Design of Dispute Settlement Procedures in International Agreements,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 371–393.Google Scholar
Krapohl, Sebastian, Faude, Benjamin, and Dinkel, Julia. 2010. “Judicial Integration in the Americas?: A Comparison of Dispute Settlement in NAFTA and Mercosur,” in Laursen, Finn (ed.), Comparative Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Abingdon: Ashgate, pp. 169–192.Google Scholar
Kwak, Kyung and Marceau, Gabrielle. 2006. “Overlaps and Conflicts of Jurisdiction between the World Trade Organization and Regional Trade Agreements,” in Bartels, Lorand and Ortino, Federico (eds.), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 465–524.Google Scholar
Lavranos, Nikolaos. 2008. “Regulating Competing Jurisdictions among International Courts and Tribunals,” Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 68: 575–621.Google Scholar
Lavranos, Nikolaos and Vielliard, Nicolas. 2008. “Competing Jurisdictions between MERCOSUR and WTO,” The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 7(2): 205–234.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. and Milner, Helen V. 1999. “The New Wave of Regionalism,” International Organization 53(3): 589–627.Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle and Wyatt, Julian. 2010. “Dispute Settlement Regimes Intermingled. Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO,” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1(1): 67–95.Google Scholar
Mayntz, Renate. 2004. “Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34(2): 237–259.Google Scholar
McCall Smith, James. 2000. “The Politics of Dispute Settlement Design: Explaining Legalism in Regional Trade Pacts,” International Organization 54(1): 137–180.Google Scholar
Mestral, Armand de. 2006. “NAFTA Dispute Settlement: Creative Experiment or Confusion?,” in Bartels, Lorand and Ortino, Federico (eds.), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 359–381.Google Scholar
Morse, Julia C. and Keohane, Robert O. 2014. “Contested Multilateralism,” The Review of International Organizations 9(4): 385–412.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2004. “Going Global, Regional, or Both? Dispute Settlement in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and Overlaps with the WTO and Other Jurisdictions,” Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 13(1): 231–304.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2006. “Adding Sweeteners to Softwood Lumber: The WTO-NAFTA ‘Spaghetti Bowl’ is Cooking,” Journal of International Economic Law 9(1): 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2014. “The Politics of Precedent in International Law: A Social Network Application,” American Political Science Review 108(03): 547–564.Google Scholar
Powers, Kathy and Goertz, Gary. 2011. “The Economic-institutional Construction of Regions: Conceptualisation and Operationalisation,” Review of International Studies 37(5): 2387–2416.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal. 2013. “Institutional Proliferation and the International Legal Order,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 293–320.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal and Victor, David G. 2004. “The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources,” International Organization 58(2): 277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittberger, Volker, Zangl, Bernhard, and Kruck, Andreas. 2012. International Organization, 2nd edn., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Romano, Cesare P. R. 2011. “A Taxonomy of International Rule of Law Institutions,” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2(1): 241–277.Google Scholar
Safrin, Sabrina. 2002. “Treaties in Collision? The Biosafety Protocol and the World Trade Organization Agreements,” American Journal of International Law 96(3): 606–628.Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval. 2003. The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth and Guzman, Andrew. 2002. “To Settle or Empanel? An Empirical Analysis of Litigation and Settlement at the World Trade Organization,” Journal of Legal Studies 31(1): 205–S236.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1985. “Coordination Versus Prisoners’ Dilemma: Implications for International Cooperation and Regimes,” American Political Science Review 79(4): 923–942.Google Scholar
Squatrito, Theresa, Young, Oran R., Follesdal, Andreas, and Ulfstein, Geir. 2018. “A Framework for Evaluating the Performance of International Courts and Tribunals,” Chapter 1 in this volume.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO,” International Organization 56(2): 339–374.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 1997. “The New GATT. Dispute Resolution and the Judicialization of the Trade Regime,” in Volcansek, Mary L. (ed.), Law above Nations: Supranational Courts and the Legalization of Politics. Gainesville, Florida: University Press of Florida, pp. 118–141.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas and McCall Smith, James. 2014. “Dispute Settlement in World Politics: States, Supranational Prosecutors, and Compliance,” European Journal of International Relations 20(1): 118–144.Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel P. 2014. The Future of International Law: Global Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2010. “Borrowing and Nonborrowing among International Courts,” The Journal of Legal Studies 39(2): 547–576.Google Scholar
Williams, Russell A. 2010. “Assessing the Success of the WTO DSM. Lessons from Softwood Lumber IV,” Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 16(1): 17–34.Google Scholar
WTO Economic Research and Statistics Division. 2013. Mapping of Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Regional Trade Agreements – Innovative or Variations on a Theme? Staff Working Paper ERSD-2013–07.Google Scholar
Yearbook of International Organizations. 2013. Yearbook of International Organizations. New York: Union of International Associations.Google Scholar
Zangl, Bernhard. 2008. “Judicialization Matters! A Comparison of Dispute Settlement under GATT and the WTO,” International Studies Quarterly 52(4): 825–854.Google Scholar
Zangl, Bernhard, Helmedach, Achim, Mondre, Aletta, Kocks, Alexander, Neubauer, Gerald, and Blome, Kerstin. 2012. “Between Law and Politics: Explaining International Dispute Settlement Behavior,” European Journal of International Relations 18(2): 369–401.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by