Book contents
- Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals
- Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Kinds of Articles
- Part II Parts of Articles
- Part III The Journal Submission and Resubmission Process
- Part IV Systemic Issues
- Chapter 19 Transparent Science
- Chapter 20 Open Access
- Chapter 21 Ethical Considerations in Submitting Articles
- Part V Conclusion
- Index
- References
Chapter 20 - Open Access
from Part IV - Systemic Issues
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 November 2018
Edited by
Book contents
- Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals
- Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Kinds of Articles
- Part II Parts of Articles
- Part III The Journal Submission and Resubmission Process
- Part IV Systemic Issues
- Chapter 19 Transparent Science
- Chapter 20 Open Access
- Chapter 21 Ethical Considerations in Submitting Articles
- Part V Conclusion
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals , pp. 238 - 250Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Beall, J. (2016). Predatory journals: Ban predators from the scientific record. Nature, 534, 326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkeley, G. (n.d.) If a tree falls in the forest, Retrieved January 7, 2018 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_a_tree_falls_in_a_forestGoogle Scholar
Björk, B.-C. (2017). Gold, green, and black open access. Learned Publishing. doi:10.1002/leap.1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enserink, M. (2016). In dramatic statement, European leaders call for “immediate” open access to all scientific papers by 2020. Science. doi:10.1126/science.aag0577Google Scholar
Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantages of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), e157.Google Scholar
Fanelli, D. (2012). Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics, 90, 891–904.Google Scholar
Franco, A., Malhorta, N., & Simonovits, G. (2017). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345, 1502–1505.Google Scholar
Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs.non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.htmlGoogle Scholar
Himmelstein, D. S., Romero, A. R., Levernier, J. G., Munro, T. A., McLaughlin, S. R., Tzovaras, B. G., & Greene, C. S. (2017). Sci-hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature. eLife 2018;7:e32822 DOI: 10.7554/eLife.32822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124.Google Scholar
Laakso, M., and Björk, B.-C. (2012). Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of the longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine, 10, 124.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J., & Pepe, A. (2016) 65 out of the 100 most cited papers are paywalled. Retrieved January 18, 2018 from www.authorea.com/users/8850/articles/125400-65-out-of-the-100-most-cited-papers-are-paywalledGoogle Scholar
Pashler, H., & Harris, C. R. (2012). Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 7, 531–536.Google Scholar
Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Editors’ introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 7(6), 528–530.Google Scholar
Pinfield, S., Salter, J., & Bath, P. A. (2016). The “total cost of publication” in a hybrid open-access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article-processing charges in combination with subscriptions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(7), 1751–1766.Google Scholar
Shen, C., & Björk, B.-C. (2015). “Predatory” open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine, 13, 230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorokowski, P., Kulczycki, E., Sorokowska, A., & Pisanski, K. (2017), Predatory journals recruit fake editor. Nature, 543, 481–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicherts, J. M., Borsboom, D., Kats, J., & Molenaar, D. (2006). The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. American Psychologist, 61(7), 726–728.Google Scholar