Book contents
- Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation
- Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Part 1 The Role of Simulation
- Part 2 The Impact of Human Factors in Clinical Practice
- 6 Introduction to Human Factors and Ergonomics in Obstetric Simulation
- 7 Situational Awareness, Bias and Decision-Making Styles in Obstetric Simulation
- 8 Team-Working, Communication and Use of Communication Aids and Checklists in an Emergency
- Part 3 Clinical Scenarios
- Scenario Section 1 Obstetric
- Scenario Section 2 Maternal Collapse
- Scenario Section 3 Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
- Scenario Section 4 Neuraxial Analgesia
- Scenario Section 5 Non-Neuraxial Analgesia
- Scenario Section 6 General Anaesthesia
- Scenario Section 7 Haemorrhage
- Scenario Section 8 Sepsis
- Scenario Section 9 Cardiac
- Scenario Section 10 Endocrine
- Scenario Section 11 Neurological
- Scenario Section 12 Trauma
- Scenario Section 13 Neonatal
- Index
- References
7 - Situational Awareness, Bias and Decision-Making Styles in Obstetric Simulation
from Part 2 - The Impact of Human Factors in Clinical Practice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2019
Book contents
- Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation
- Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Part 1 The Role of Simulation
- Part 2 The Impact of Human Factors in Clinical Practice
- 6 Introduction to Human Factors and Ergonomics in Obstetric Simulation
- 7 Situational Awareness, Bias and Decision-Making Styles in Obstetric Simulation
- 8 Team-Working, Communication and Use of Communication Aids and Checklists in an Emergency
- Part 3 Clinical Scenarios
- Scenario Section 1 Obstetric
- Scenario Section 2 Maternal Collapse
- Scenario Section 3 Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
- Scenario Section 4 Neuraxial Analgesia
- Scenario Section 5 Non-Neuraxial Analgesia
- Scenario Section 6 General Anaesthesia
- Scenario Section 7 Haemorrhage
- Scenario Section 8 Sepsis
- Scenario Section 9 Cardiac
- Scenario Section 10 Endocrine
- Scenario Section 11 Neurological
- Scenario Section 12 Trauma
- Scenario Section 13 Neonatal
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Obstetric Decision-Making and Simulation , pp. 37 - 44Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Bromiley, M. (2008). Have you ever made a mistake. A Patient Liaison Group Debate. Royal College of Anaesthetists Bulletin, 48, 2442–2445.Google Scholar
Croskerry, P. (2002). Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9(11), 1184–1204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croskerry, P. (2009). Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process model of reasoning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(1), 27–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croskerry, P., Singhal, G. and Mamede, S. (2013a). Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22(Suppl 2), ii58–ii64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croskerry, P., Singhal, G. and Mamede, S. (2013b). Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change. BMJ Quality & Safety, pp.bmjqs-2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowther, C. A., Dodd, J. M., Hiller, J. E., Haslam, R. R., Robinson, J. S. and Birth After Caesarean Study Group (2012). Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial. PLoS Medicine, 9(3), e1001192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endsley, M. R. (2006). Expertise and situation awareness. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J. and Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, pp. 633–651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fioratou, E., Flin, R., Glavin, R. and Patey, R. (2010). Beyond monitoring: distributed situation awareness in anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 105(1), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzpatrick, K. E., Kurinczuk, J. J., Alfirevic, Z., Spark, P., Brocklehurst, P. and Knight, M. (2012). Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study. PLoS Medicine, 9(3), e1001184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, M. L., Kissam, S., Payne, V. L., et al. (2012). Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review. BMJ Quality & Safety, pp.bmjqs-2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HEENW. (2017). Resources|Health Education North West. [Online]. Available from: www.nwpgmd.nhs.uk/resources (accessed April 26, 2017).Google Scholar
Klein, G. A. and Hoffman, R. R. (1993). Perceptual-cognitive aspects of expertise. In Rabinowitz, M. (Ed.), Cognitive Science Foundations of Instruction, pp. 203–226. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Knight, M., Kenyon, S., Brocklehurst, P., Neilson, J., Shakespeare, J. and Kurinczuk, J. J. (Eds.) on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. (2014). Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care – Lessons Learned to Inform Future Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2009–12. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Ross, L., Shafer, J. and Klein, G., (2006). Professional judgements and ‘naturalistic decision making’. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J. and Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, pp. 403–420. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, C. M., Endsley, M. R., Kochs, E. F., Gelb, A. W. and Wagner, K. J. (2013). Situation awareness in anesthesia concept and research. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 118(3), 729–742.Google ScholarPubMed
Stiegler, M. P. and Tung, A. (2014). Cognitive processes in anesthesiology decision making. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 120(1), 204–217.Google Scholar
Strachan, B. K. and Baden Fuller, J. (2009). Dealing with conflict and aggression in obstetrics and gynaecology. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 11, 122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1975). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. In Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making, pp. 141–162. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yee, L. M., Liu, L. Y. and Grobman, W. A. (2015). Relationship between obstetricians’ cognitive and affective traits and delivery outcomes among women with a prior cesarean. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 213(3), 413–e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed