Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T19:31:25.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Privacy and Dignity in Acute Hospitals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2024

George Tadros
Affiliation:
Aston University, Birmingham
George Crowther
Affiliation:
Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds
Get access

Summary

Numerous reports addressing the care of older people have highlighted deficiencies in th provision of nutrition, hydration, and personal hygiene. Healthcare organisations may inadvertently compromise dignity by prioritising measurable targets and not placing due emphasis on the core work of looking after frail older people who are at risk of having their dignity violated.

The concept of dignity draws on ideas of dignity of merit, moral stature, and Menschenwürde (human dignity) – the dignity that each individual has as an essential component of being a human being. It is argued here that older people, as a group, are particularly worthy of the dignity of merit of wisdom, by virtue of their experience and associated understanding.

A suitable environment is important to promoting dignity; the emphasis is not only on basics like nutrition, hydration, and hygiene but on the delivery of person-centred care that encourages understanding of an older person’s life story.

Dying will come to us all (with even greater certainty than old age), and all older people have a right to respect and dignity when dying. Understanding how someone lived their life, and what was important to that person allows us to co-write the final chapter with preservation of autonomy and maintenance of dignity of personal identity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Centre for Ageing Better. Doddery but dear? Examining age-related stereotypes. 2020. www.ageing-better.org.uk/sites/default/files/2020-03/Doddery-but-dear.pdf.Google Scholar
Mistry, R. Family Matters. London: Faber, 2001.Google Scholar
National Dignity Council. The Dignity in Care campaign. About page, 2023. www.dignityincare.org.uk/About/Dignity_in_Care_campaign.Google Scholar
Health Service Ombudsman. Care and compassion: Report of the Health Service Ombudsman on ten investigations into NHS care of older people. Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, 2011. www.ombudsman.org.uk/publications/care-and-compassion.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centre for Policy on Ageing. Ageism and Age Discrimination in Secondary Health Care in the United Kingdom. Centre for Policy on Ageing, 2009. www.cpa.org.uk/information/reviews/CPA-ageism_and_age_discrimination_in_secondary_health_care-report.pdf.Google Scholar
Care Quality Commission. Dignity and Nutrition Inspection Programme: National Overview. Care Quality Commission, October 2011. www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/20111007_dignity_and_nutrition_inspection_report_final_update.pdf.Google Scholar
The All-Party Parliamentary Group. Inquiry into human rights and older people: Protecting our rights as we age. Age UK, 2018. www.ageuk.org.uk/globalassets/age-uk/documents/reports-and-publications/appg/appg_ageingandolderpeople_humanrights_jun18.pdf.Google Scholar
Alzheimer’s Society. Counting the Cost: Caring for People with dementia on Hospital Wards. Alzheimer’s Society, 2009. www.alzheimers.org.uk/sites/default/files/2018-05/Counting_the_cost_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Francis, R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office, 2013. assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/279124/0947.pdf.Google Scholar
Department of Health. Patients First and Foremost: The Initial Government Response to the Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. 2013. assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/170701/Patients_First_and_Foremost.pdf.Google Scholar
Tadd, W., Hillman, A., Calnan, M., et al. Dignity in Practice: An Exploration of the Care of Older Adults in Acute NHS Trusts. Cardiff University and Kent University, 2011. www.netscc.ac.uk/hsdr/files/project/SDO_FR_08-1819-218_V02.pdf.Google Scholar
Ellis, G., Gardner, M., Tsiachristas, A., et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017, 9: CD006211. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006211.pub3.Google ScholarPubMed
Ellis, G., and Langhorne, P. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older hospital patients. Br Med Bull 2004, 71: 4559. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldh033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Dignity Council. The 10 dignity do’s. About page, 2009. www.dignityincare.org.uk/About/The_10_Point_Dignity_Challenge.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, s.v. ‘dignity’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nordenfelt, L. Dignity in Care for Older People. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2009, here p. 00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, N. Dignity and health: A review. Soc Sci Med 2007, 64(2): 292302. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, N. A taxonomy of dignity: A grounded theory study. BMC International Health and Human Rights 2009, 9(1): 3. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-9-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Kings Fund. Is your ward dementia friendly? EHE environmental assessment tool. 2014. www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/EHE-dementia-assessment-tool.pdf.Google Scholar
The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. legislation.gov.uk, 2014. www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2936/regulation/9/made.Google Scholar
Kitwood, T.M. Dementia Reconsidered: The Person Comes First. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Alzheimer’s Society. This is me: A support tool to enable person-centred care. Alzheimer’s Society, 2020. www.alzheimers.org.uk/get-support/publications-factsheets/this-is-me.Google Scholar
Sutton, E.J., and Coast, J. Development of a supportive care measure for economic evaluation of end-of-life care using qualitative methods. Palliative Medicine 2014, 28(2): 151–7. doi: 10.1177/0269216313489368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×