Book contents
- Contagion and War
- Contagion and War
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Theoretical Expectations
- Part II Dyadic Case Analyses: History and Data
- Part III Conclusions: Lessons from the First World War
- References
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2018
Book contents
- Contagion and War
- Contagion and War
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Theoretical Expectations
- Part II Dyadic Case Analyses: History and Data
- Part III Conclusions: Lessons from the First World War
- References
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Contagion and WarLessons from the First World War, pp. 372 - 386Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abbenhuis, Maartje (2014a). An Age of Neutrals: Great Power Politics, 1815–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbenhuis, Maartje (2014b). Foreign policy (the Netherlands). In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.11102.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. (2002). Toward a new political methodology: Microfoundations and ART. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 423–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afflerbach, Holger and Stevenson, David (2007). An Improbable War? The Outbreak of World War I and European Political Culture before 1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aksakal, Mustafa (2008). The Ottoman Road to War in 1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aksakal, Mustafa (2011). The limits of diplomacy: The Ottoman Empire and the First World War. Foreign Policy Analysis, 7(2), 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertini, Luigi (1952). The Origins of the War of 1914, Vols. I–III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Harry E. (1970 [1926]). The Genesis of the War: An Introduction to the Problem of War Guilt. New York: Howard Fertig.Google Scholar
Bastias Saavedra, Manuel (2014). Nitrate. In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10228.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2015). Process tracing: From philosophical roots to best practices. In Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T., eds., Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–37.Google Scholar
Bobroff, Ronald P. (2006). Roads to Glory: Late Imperial Russia and the Turkish Straits. New York: I. B. Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobroff, Ronald P. (2014). War accepted but unsought: Russia’s growing militancy and the July crisis, 1914. In Levy, Jack S. and Vasquez, John A., eds., The Outbreak of the First World War: Structure, Politics, and Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Andrew, ed. (1918). The Brazilian Green Book, Consisting of Diplomatic Documents Relating to Brazil’s Attitude with Regard to the European War, 1914–1917. Authorized English Version. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério das Relações Exteriores.Google Scholar
Braumoeller, Bear F. (2019). Only the Dead: The Persistence of War in the Modern Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bremer, Stuart A. (1982). The contagiousness of coercion: The spread of serious international disputes, 1900–1976. International Interactions, 9(1), 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, Stuart A. (1992). Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816–1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(June), 309–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, Stuart A. (1995). Advancing the scientific study of war. In Bremer, Stuart A. and Cusak, Thomas R., eds., The Process of War: Advancing the Scientific Study of War. Luxembourg: Gordon and Breach, pp. 259–273.Google Scholar
Brocheux, Pierre (2015). Colonial society (Indochina). In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10613.Google Scholar
Cain, Peter and Hopkins, Tony (2002). British Imperialism, 1688–2002, 2nd edn, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. and Stanley, Julian C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf (1962). The Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chi, Sang-Hyun, Flint, Colin, Diehl, Paul F., Vasquez, John A., Scheffran, Jürgen, Rider, Toby, and Radil, Steven M. (2014). The spatial diffusion of war: The case of World War I. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 49(1), 57–76.Google Scholar
Choucri, Nazli and North, Robert C. (1975). Nations in Conflict: National Growth and International Violence. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Christensen, Thomas J. and Snyder, Jack (1990). Chain gangs and passed bucks: Predicting alliance patterns in multipolarity. International Organization, 44(2), 137–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Christopher (2012). The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Cohn, Einar (1930). Denmark. In Heckscher, Eli F., Bergendal, Kurt, Keilhau, Wilhelm, Cohn, Einar, and Thorsteinsson, Thorsteinn, eds., Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Iceland in the World War. New Haven, Yale University Press, pp. 411–558.Google Scholar
Colaresi, Michael, Rasler, Karen, and Thompson, William R. (2007). Strategic Rivalries in World Politics: Position, Space and Conflict Escalation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, John Milton (1976). The command of gold reversed: American loans to Britain, 1915–1917. Pacific Historical Review, 45(May), 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, John Milton Jr. (2003). The United States. In Hamilton, Richard F. and Herwig, Holder H., eds., The Origins of World War I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 415–442.Google Scholar
Copeland, Dale C. (2014a). Economic Interdependence and War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Copeland, Dale C. (2014b). International relations theory and three great puzzles of the First World War. In Levy, Jack W. and Vasquez, John A., eds., The Outbreak of the First World War: Structure, Politics, and Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Timothy W. (2003). Pivotal Deterrence: Third-Party Statecraft and the Pursuit of Peace. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cronin, Thomas E. (1989). Inventing the American Presidency. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Davis, William W., Duncan, George T., and Siverson, Randolph M. (1978). The dynamics of warfare, 1815–1965, American Journal Political Science, 22(November): 772–792.Google Scholar
Declarations of War: Severances of Diplomatic Relations, 1914–1918 (1919). Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Dehne, Phillip (2011). Britain’s global war and Argentine Neutrality. In Hertog, Johan den and Kruizinga, Samuël, eds., Caught in the Middle: Neutrals, Neutrality and the First World War. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Frederick R. (2003). Japan. In Hamilton, Richard and Herwig, Holger, eds., The Origins of World War I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 300–336.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Frederick R. (2011). Globalizing ConflictSpace: The view from Asia, Foreign Policy Analysis, 7(2), 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, Paul F. (1983). Arms races and escalation: A closer look. Journal of Peace Research, 20(3), 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, Paul F. and Goertz, Gary (2000). War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Diehl, Paul F. and Goertz, Gary (2012). The rivalry process: How rivalries are sustained and terminated. In Vasquez, John A., ed., What Do We Know about War?, 2nd edn, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 83–109.Google Scholar
Diehl, Paul F. and Wright, Thorin (2016). A conditional defense of the dyadic approach. International Studies Quarterly, 60(2), 363–368.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry (1975). Case studies and theory in political science. In Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W., eds., Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7. Reading: Addison-Wesley, pp. 94–137.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. (1995). Rationalist explanations of war. International Organization. 49(3), 379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Niall (1999). The Pity of War: Explaining World War I, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fischer, Fritz (1975). War of Illusions: German Policies from 1911 to 1914. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Flint, Colin, Diehl, Paul, Scheffran, Jürgen, Vasquez, John A., and Sang-Hyun, Chi (2009). Conceptualizing ConflictSpace: Towards a geography of relational power and embeddedness in the analysis of conflict. The Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(5), 827–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freyberg-Inan, Annette, Harrison, Ewan, and James, Patrick (2016). Conclusion: Different standards for discovery and confirmation. In Freyberg-Inan, Anette, Harrison, Ewan, and James, Patrick, eds., Evaluating Progress in International Relations: How Do You Know? New York: Routledge, pp. 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Martin B. (2014). Austro-Hungarian War Aims in the Balkans during World War I. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedberg, Aaron L. (1988). The Weary Titan: Britain and the Experience of Relative Decline, 1895–1905. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fromkin, David (1989). A Peace to End All Peace: Creating the Modern Middle East, 1914–1922. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara (1990). How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics. Political Analysis, 2, 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geller, Daniel S. (1992). Capability concentration, power transition, and war. International Interactions, 17(3), 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L. (1979). Case studies and theory development: The method of structured focused comparison. In Lauren, Paul Gordon, ed., Diplomacy: New Approaches in History. New York: Free Press, pp. 43–68.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew (2005). Case Studies and Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Smoke, Richard (1974). Deterrence in American Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, John (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ghosn, Faten, Palmer, Glenn, and Bremer, Stuart A. (2004). The MID3 data set: 1993–2001: Procedures, coding rules, and description. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 21(2), 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibler, Douglas M. (2009). Handbook of International Alliances, 1648–2008, Washington: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Gibler, Douglas M. (2012). The Territorial Peace: Borders, State Development and International Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibler, Douglas M. and Sarkees, Meredith Reid (2004). Measuring alliances: The Correlates of War Formal Interstate Alliance Dataset, 1816–2000. Journal of Peace Research, 41(2), 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, Hein E. (2000). War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination & the First World War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertz, Gary (2017). Multimethod Research, Causal Mechanisms, and Case Studies: An Integrated Approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. and Freeman, John R. (1990). Three-Way Street: Strategic Reciprocity in World Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gould, P. R. (1969). Spatial Diffusion. Washington: Association of American Geographers.Google Scholar
Haldi, Stacy Bergstrom (2003). Why Wars Widen: A Theory of Predation and Balancing. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard C. (2003). Bulgaria, Romania, and Greece. In Hamilton, Richard F. and Herwig, Holger H., eds., The Origins of World War I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 389–414.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Richard F. and Herwig, Holger H., eds. (2003). The Origins of World War I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haug, Karl Erik (2016). Norway. In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10809.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary (1992). The science of politics and the politics of science. In Hawkesworth, Mary and Kogan, Maurice, eds., Encyclopedia of Government and Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 5–39.Google Scholar
Heaton, John L., ed. (1924). Cobb of “The World”: A Leader in Liberalism. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Hell, Stefan (2015). Siam. In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10596.Google Scholar
Hensel, Paul R., Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, Sowers, Thomas E. II, and Thyne, Clayton L. (2008). Bones of contention: Comparing territorial, maritime, and river issues. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(February), 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertog, Johan den (2011). Dutch neutrality and the value of legal argumentation. In den Hertog, Johan and Kruizinga, Samuël, eds., Caught in the Middle: Neutrals, Neutrality and the First World War. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 15–33.Google Scholar
Herwig, H., (2009). The Marne, 1914: The Opening of World War I and the Battle That Changed the World. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole (1972). Crisis, Escalation, War. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Michael Dean (1987). Arms Races and the International System. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Hull, Isabel V. (2014). A Scrap of Paper: Breaking and Making International Law during the Great War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, David (2017). World War 1 history: Japanese Navy in the Mediterranean. https://owlcation.com/humanities/World-War-1-History-Japanese-Navy-in-the-Mediterranean.Google Scholar
James, Patrick and Wilkenfeld, Jonathan (1984). Structural factors and international crisis behavior. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 7(2), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jiménez, Patricia V. (2014). Press (Latin America). In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Aalan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10343.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel, Bremer, Stuart A., and Singer, J. David (1996). Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15(2), 163–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Choong-Nam (2012). Alliances: Path to peace or path to war? In Vasquez, John A., ed., What Do We Know about War?, 2nd edn. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 27–44.Google Scholar
Keiger, John F. V. (1983). France and the Origins of the First World War. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keilhau, Wilhelm (1930). Norway. In Heckscher, Eli F., Kurt, Bergendal, Wlhelm, Keilhau, Einar, Cohn, and Thorsteinn, Thorsteinsson, eds., Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Iceland in the World War. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 281–407.Google Scholar
Kennan, George F. (1984). The Fateful Alliance: France, Russia, and the Coming of the First World War. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul M. (1980). The Rise of the Anglo-German Antagonism, 1860–1914. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul M. (1984). The First World War and the International Power System. International Security, 9(Summer), 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Ross (2014) Peace initiatives. In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10405.Google Scholar
Kenwick, Michael, Vasquez, John A., and Powers, Matthew A. (2015). Do alliances really deter? Journal of Politics, 77(October): 943–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd edn. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Klein, James P., Goertz, Gary, and Diehl, Paul F. (2006). The new rivalry data set: Procedures and patterns. Journal of Peace Research, 43(3), 331–348.Google Scholar
Knock, Thomas J. (1992). To End All Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Koller, Christian (2014). Colonial military participation in Europe (Africa). In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10193.Google Scholar
Kruizinga, Samuël (2011). NOT neutrality: The Dutch government, the Netherlands overseas trust company and the entente blockade of Germany, 1914–1918. In den Hertog, Johan and Kruizinga, Samuël, eds., Caught in the Middle: Neutrals, Neutrality and the First World War. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruizinga, Samuël (2014). Neutrality. In Winter, Jay, ed., The Cambridge History of the First World War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 542–575.Google Scholar
Kruizinga, Samuël, Moeyes, Paul, and Klinkert, Wim (2014). The Netherlands. In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Aalan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/id1418.10432Google Scholar
Lake, David (2009). Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Langer, William L. (1967 [1929]). The Franco-Russian Alliance, 1890–1894. New York: Octagon Books.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned (2007). Contingency, catalysts and nonlinear change: The origins of World War I. In Goertz, Gary and Levy, Jack S., eds., Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals. New York: Routledge, pp. 85–111.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned (2010) Forbidden Fruit: Counterfactuals and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Leeds, Brett Ashley, Ritter, Jeffrey M., Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, and Long, Andrew G. (2002). Alliance treaty obligations and provisions, 1815–1944. International Interactions, 28(3), 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, Russell J. (1983). When will they ever learn? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 27(3), 379–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. (1982). The contagion of Great Power war behavior, 1495–1975. American Journal of Political Science, 26(3), 562–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. (1983). War in the Modern Great Power System, 1495–1975. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. (1990/1991). Mobilization and inadvertence in the July crisis. International Security, 16(1), 189–203.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. (1992). Prospect theory and international relations: Theoretical applications and analytical problems. Political Psychology, 13(2), 283–310.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. (1996). Loss aversion, framing, and bargaining: The implications of prospect theory for international conflict. International Political Science Review, 17(2), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. (2007). The role of necessary conditions in the outbreak of World War I. In Goertz, Gary and Levy, Jack S., eds., Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals. New York: Routledge, pp. 47–84.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. (2011). The initiation and spread of the First World War: Interdependent decisions. Foreign Policy Analysis, 7(April), 183–188.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. (2014). The sources of preventive logic in German decision-making in 1914. In Levy, Jack S. and Vasquez, John A., eds., The Outbreak of the First World War: Structure, Politics, and Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. and Mulligan, William (2017). Shifting power, preventive logic, and the response of the target: Germany, Russia, and the First World War. Journal of Strategic Studies, 40(5), 731–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Keir A. (2007). The new history of World War I and what it means for international relations theory. International Security, 2(2), 155–191.Google Scholar
Lieven, Dominic (2015). The End of Tsarist Russia: The March to World War I and Revolution. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Link, Arthur S. (1979). Woodrow Wilson: Revolution, War, and Peace. Arlington Heights: AHM Publishing.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, David (1994). Serbia as Piedmont and the Yugoslav idea, 1804–1914. East European Quarterly, 28(2), 1–98.Google Scholar
MacMillan, Margaret (2001). Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
MacMillan, Margaret (2013). The War That Ended Peace: The Road to 1914. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Mansbach, Richard W. and Vasquez, John A. (1981). In Search of Theory: A New Paradigm for Global Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, Terris, Lesley G., Kuperman, Ranan D., and Talmud, Ilan (2007). What is the enemy of my enemy: Causes and consequences of imbalanced international relations, 1816–2001. Journal of Politics, 69(1), 100–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, Harold (1994). A History of Ethiopia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Percy Alvin (1925). Latin America and the War. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
McMeekin, Sean (2011). The Russian Origins of the First World War. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Menning, Bruce (2015). Russian military intelligence, July 1914: What St. Petersburg perceived and why it mattered. The Historian, 77(Summer), 213–268.Google Scholar
Meyer, G. J. (2016). The World Remade: America in World War I. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Midlarsky, Manus I. (1990). Big wars, little wars – A single theory? International Interactions, 16(3), 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mombauer, Annika (2002). The Origins of the First World War: Controversies and Consensus. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mombauer, Annika (2006). Of war plans and war guilt: The debate surrounding the Schlieffen plan. Journal of Strategic Studies, 28(5), 857–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mombauer, Annika (2013a). The Fischer controversy, documents and the “truth” about the origins of the First World War. The Journal of Contemporary History, 48(2), 290–314.Google Scholar
Mombauer, Annika, ed. (2013b). The Origins of the First World War: Diplomatic and Military Documents. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1948, 1954, 1973). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 1st edn, 2nd edn, 5th edn, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1952). Another “great debate”: The nationalist interest of the United States. The American Political Science Review, 46(4), 961–988.Google Scholar
Most, Benjamin A. and Starr, Harvey (1980). Diffusion, reinforcement, geopolitics, and the spread of war. American Political Science Review, 74(December), 932–946.Google Scholar
Most, Benjamin A. and Starr, Harvey (1989). Inquiry, Logic, and International Politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Mulligan, William (2010). The Origins of the First World War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nish, Ian (1972). Alliance in Decline: A Study in Anglo-Japanese Relations, 1909–1923. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Organski, A. F. K. and Kugler, Jacek (1980). The War Ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Orvik, Nils (1953). The Decline of Neutrality, 1914–1941. Oslo: Johan Grundt Tanum Forlag.Google Scholar
Otte, Thomas G. (2014). July Crisis: The World’s Descent into War, Summer 1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pad, Kumlertsakul (2017). Why did Siam join the First World War? http://blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk/blog/siam-enter-first-world-war/.Google Scholar
Paige, Edward (2007). Tip and Run: The Untold Tragedy of the Great War in Africa. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
The Papers of Woodrow Wilson, Vol. 41: January 24–April 6, 1917, ed. Link, Arthur S.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, Karen K., Vasquez, John A., and Wang, Yijia (2004). Multiparty disputes and the probability of war, 1816–1992. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 21(2), 85–100.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven (2011). The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Poast, Paul (2010). (Mis)using dyadic data to analyze multilateral events. Political Analysis, 18(4), 403–425.Google Scholar
Poast, Paul (2012). Does issue linkage work? Evidence from European alliance negotiations, 1860 to 1945. International Organization, 66(2), 277–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponce, Javier (2011). Spanish neutrality in the First World War. In den Hertog, Johan and Kruizinga, Samuël, eds., Caught in the Middle: Neutrals, Neutrality and the First World War. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 53–65.Google Scholar
Ponce, Javier (2014). Spain. In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10584.Google Scholar
Qvarnström, Sofi (2014). Sweden. In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10150.Google Scholar
Radil, Steven M., Flint, Colin, and Chi, Sang-Hyun (2013). A relational geography of war: Actor–context interaction and the spread of World War I. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(6), 1468–1484.Google Scholar
Raghavan, Spinath (2016). India’s War: World War II and the Making of Modern South Asia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rasler, Karen and Thompson, William R. (1983). Global wars, public debt and the long cycle. World Politics, 35(4), 489–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasler, Karen and Thompson, William R. (1989). War and State Making: The Shaping of the Global Powers. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Ray, James Lee (2003). Explaining interstate conflict and war: What should be controlled for? Conflict Management and Peace Science, 20(2), 1–31.Google Scholar
Reiter, Dan (1996). Crucible of Beliefs: Learning, Alliances, and World Wars. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, Dan (2003). Exploring the bargaining model of war. Perspectives on Politics, 1(1), 27–43.Google Scholar
Rich, Norman (1985). Why the Crimean War?: A Cautionary Tale. Lebanon: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Richardson, James L. (1994). Crisis Diplomacy: The Great Powers since the Mid-Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. (1962). The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rinke, Stefan (2015). Propaganda war (Latin America). In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10537.Google Scholar
Rinke, Stefan, and Kriegesmann, Karina (2015). Latin America. In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10760.Google Scholar
Riste, Olav (1965). The Neutral Ally: Norway’s Relations with Belligerent Powers in the First World War. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Röhl, John C. G. (1994) The Kaiser and His Court: Wilhelm II and the Government of Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Röhl, John C. G. (2012). The curious case of the Kaiser’s disappearing war guilt: Wilhelm II in July 1914. In Afflerbach, Holger and Stevenson, David, eds., An Improbable War?: The Outbreak of World War I and European Political Culture before 1914. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 75–92.Google Scholar
Röhl, John C. G. (2014). Kaiser Wilhelm II, 1859–1941: A Concise Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rollo, Maria Fernanda, Pires, Ana Paula, and Ribeiro de Meneses, Filipe (2017). Portugal. In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.11152.Google Scholar
Rosen, Steven (1972). War power and the willingness to suffer. In Russett, Bruce, ed., Peace, War, and Numbers. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 167–184.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. (1966). Pre-theories and theories in foreign policy. In Farrell, R. B., ed., Approaches to Comparative and International Politics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 27–93.Google Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph J. (1972). U.S. foreign relations: Conflict, cooperation, and attribute distances. In Russett, Bruce, ed., Peace, War, and Numbers. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 71–113.Google Scholar
Sabrosky, Alan Ned (1985). Alliance aggregation, capability distribution, and the expansion of interstate war. In Sabrosky, A. N., ed., Polarity and War. Boulder: Westview, pp. 145–189.Google Scholar
Salmon, Patrick (1997). Scandinavia and the Great Powers 1890–1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sample, Susan G. (1997). Arms races and dispute escalation: Resolving the debate. Journal of Peace Research, 34(1), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sample, Susan G. (2002). The outcomes of military buildups: Minor vs. major powers. Journal of Peace Research, 39(6), 669–692.Google Scholar
Sample, Susan G., Valeriano, Brandon, and Kang, Choong-Nam (2013). The societal determinants of impact of military spending patterns. Political and Military Sociology: An Annual Review, 41, 109–133.Google Scholar
Sarkees, Meredith Reid and Wayman, Frank W. (2010) Resort to War 1816–2008. Washington: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Stefan (2007). Frankreichs Außenpolitik in der Julikrise 1914: Ein Betrag zur Geschichte des Ausbruchs des Ersten Weltkrieges. Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Paul W. (1999). A pointless rivalry: France and the Habsburg monarchy, 1715–1918. In Thompson, William R., ed., Great Power Rivalries. Columbia: University of South Carolina, pp. 60–85.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Paul W. (2007). Stealing horses to great applause: Austria-Hungary’s decision in 1914 in system perspective. In Afflerbach, Holger and Stevenson, David, eds., An Improbable War? The Outbreak of World War I and European Political Culture. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 17–42.Google Scholar
Schulze, Frederik (2015). Brazil. In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10579.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randy (1994). Bandwagoning for profit: Bringing the revisionist state back in. International Security, 19(Summer), 72–107.Google Scholar
Scott, James Brown (1918). War between Austria-Hungary and the United States. The American Journal of International Law, 12(1), 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senese, Paul D. and Vasquez, John A. (2008). The Steps to War: An Empirical Study. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shirkey, Zachary C. (2009). Is This a Private Fight or Can Anybody Join?: The Spread of Interstate War. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David (1969). The incomplete theorist: Insight without evidence. In Knorr, Klauss and Rosenau, James, eds., Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 62–86.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David and Small, Melvin (1966). Formal alliances, 1815–1939: A quantitative description. Journal of Peace Research, 3(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siverson, Randolph M. and King, Joel (1979). Alliances and the expansion of war, 1815–1965. In Singer, J. David and Wallace, Michael, eds., To Augur Well. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 37–49.Google Scholar
Siverson, Randolph M. and Starr, Harvey (1991). The Diffusion of War: A Study of Opportunity and Willingness. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, Melvin and Singer, J. David (1969). Formal alliances, 1815–1965: An extension of the basic data. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H. and Diesing, Paul (1977). Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack (1984). The Ideology of the Offensive: Military Decision Making and the Disasters of 1914. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sørensen, Nils Arne (2014). Denmark. In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10276.Google Scholar
Stapleton, Timothy J. (2016). Union of South Africa. In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 15463/ie1418.10848,Google Scholar
Stearns, Peter N. and Langer, William L. (2001). The Encyclopedia of World History, 6th edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Stein, Arthur A. (2015). Respites or resolutions? Recurring crises and the origins of war. In Rosecrance, Richard N. and Miller, Steven E. eds., The Next Great War? The Roots of World War I and the Risk of U.S.–China Conflict. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 13–23.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Jonathan (1966). The Copenhagen complex. Journal of Contemporary History, 1(3), 23–46.Google Scholar
Steiner, Zara S. and Neilson, Keith (2003). Britain and the Origins of the First World War, 2nd edn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stevenson, David (1996). Armaments and the Coming of the War: Europe 1904–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, David (2007). Battlefield or barrier? Rearmament and military planning in Belgium, 1902–1914. International History Review, 29(3), 473–507.Google Scholar
Stevenson, David (2011). From Balkan conflict to global conflict: The spread of the First World War, 1914–18. Foreign Policy Analysis, 7(2), 169–182.Google Scholar
Stevenson, David (2017). 1917: War, Peace, and Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sweers, Erik (2016). Neutraal Moresnet: de vergeten ministaat. Historiën, www.historien.nl/neutraal-moresnet/.Google Scholar
Tato, Maria Ines (2014). Yrigoyen Hipólito. In Daniel, Ute, Gatrell, Peter, Janz, Oliver, Jones, Heather, Keene, Jennifer, Kramer, Alan, and Nasson, Bill, eds., 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10091.Google Scholar
Thompson, William R. (1992). Dehio, long cycles and the geohistorical context of structural transition. World Politics, 45(1), 127–152.Google Scholar
Thompson, William R. (1995). Principal rivalries. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39(June), 195–223.Google Scholar
Thompson, William R. (2001). Identifying rivalries in world politics. International Studies Quarterly, 45(4), 557–586.Google Scholar
Thompson, William R. (2003). A streetcar named Sarajevo: Catalysts, multiple causation chains, and rivalry structures. International Studies Quarterly, 47(3), 453–469.Google Scholar
Thompson, William R., and Dreyer, David R. (2012). Handbook of International Rivalries, 1494–2010. Washington: CQ Press, Sage.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1975). The Formation of Nation States in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tir, Jaroslav and Diehl, Paul F. (2002). Geographic dimensions of enduring rivalries. Political Geography, 21(February), 263–286.Google Scholar
Tooze, Adam (2014). The Deluge: The Great War, America and the Remaking of the Global Order, 1916–1931. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc (1990/1991). The meaning of mobilization in 1914. International Security, 15(3), 120–150.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc (2010). French foreign policy in the July crisis, 1914: A review article. H-Diplo/ISSF, No. 3.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc (2017). New light on 1914? Forum in H-Diplo/ISSF, ed. Jervis, Robert, Gavin, Frank, and Labrosse, Diane, 16 (September), 10–56 (www.h-net.org/diplo/ISSF1) online.Google Scholar
Trumpener, Ulrich (2003). The Ottoman Empire. In Hamilton, Richard F. and Herwig, Holger H., eds., The Origins of World War I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 337–355.Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen (1984). The cult of the offensive and the origins of the First World War. International Security, 9(1), 58–107.Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen (1999). Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conflict. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. (1993). The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John A. (1995). Why do neighbors fight? Proximity, interactions, or territoriality. Journal of Peace Research, 32(3), 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John A. (1996a). The causes of the Second World War in Europe: A new scientific explanation. International Political Science Review, 17(April), 161–178.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. (1996b). Distinguishing rivals that go to war from those that do not: A quantitative comparative case study of the two paths to war. International Studies Quarterly, 40(4), 531–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John A. (2002). The Vienna peace system: Why it worked and why it broke down. In Kruger, Peter and Schroeder, Paul, eds., The Transformation of European Politics, 1763–1848: Episode or Model in Modern History? Münster: LIT Verlag, pp. 235–241.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. (2009). The War Puzzle Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John A. (2014a). The First World War and international relations theory: A review of books on the 100th anniversary. International Studies Review, 16(4), 623–644.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. (2014b). Was the First World War a preventive war? Concepts, criteria, and evidence. In Levy, Jack S. and Vasquez, John A., eds., The Outbreak of the First World War: Structure, Politics, and Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John A. and Gibler, Douglas (2001). The steps to war in Asia, 1931–1941. Security Studies, 10(Spring), 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John A. and Henehan, Marie T. (2001). Territorial disputes and the probability of war, 1816–1992. Journal of Peace Research, 38(2), 123–138.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. and Kang, C. (2013). How and why the Cold War became a long peace: Some statistical insights. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(1), 28–50.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. and Leskiw, Christopher S. (2001). The origins of interstate rivalry, 1816–1992. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(September), 295–316.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. and Rundlett, Ashlea (2016). Alliances as a necessary condition of multiparty wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 60(December), 1395–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John A. and Valeriano, Brandon (2010). Classification of interstate wars. Journal of Politics, 72(2), 292–309.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A., Diehl, Paul F., Flint, Colin, Scheffran, Jürgen, Chi, Sang-Hyun, and Rider, Toby J. (2011). The ConflictSpace of cataclysm: The international system and the spread of war 1914–1917. Foreign Policy Analysis, 7(2), 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayman, Frank, Williamson, Paul, Polachek, Solomon, and Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, eds. (2014). Predicting the Future in Science, Economics, and Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Weisiger, Alex (2013). Logics of War: Explanations for Limited and Unlimited Wars. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitsman, Patricia A. (2004). Dangerous Alliances: Proponents of Peace, Weapons of War. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Weitsman, Patricia A. (2014). Waging War: Alliances, Coalitions, and Institutions of Interstate Violence. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Samuel R. Jr. (1969). The Politics of Grand Strategy: Britain and France Prepare for War, 1904–1914. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Samuel R. Jr. (1991). Austria-Hungary and the Origins of the First World War. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Williamson, Samuel R. Jr. (2014). July 1914 revisited and revised: The erosion of the German paradigm. In Levy, Jack S. and Vasquez, John A., eds., The Outbreak of the First World War: Structure, Politics, and Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–62.Google Scholar
Williamson, Samuel R., Jr. and Van Wyk, Russel (2003). July 1914: Soldiers, Statesmen and the Coming of the Great War: A Brief Documentary History. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Yoshinobu and Bremer, Stuart A. (1980). Wider wars and restless nights: Major power intervention in ongoing war. In Singer, J. D., ed., The Correlates of War, vol. II. New York: Free Press, pp. 199–229.Google Scholar
Zagare, Frank C. (2011). The Games of July: Explaining the Great War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Zinn, Howard (1980). A People’s History of the United States. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
Zuber, Terrence (2002). Inventing the Schlieffen Plan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar