Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- 13 A Review of Work–Family Research in Western and Southern Europe
- 14 A Review of Work–Family Research in Central and Eastern Europe
- 15 A Review of Work–Family Research in the Nordic Region
- 16 A Review of Work–Family Research in Latin America
- 17 A Review of Work–Family Research in Africa
- 18 A Review of Work–Family Research in the Middle East
- 19 A Review of Work–Family Research in South East Asia
- 20 A Review of Work–Family Research in Confucian Asia
- 21 A Review of Work–Family Research in Australia and New Zealand
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
15 - A Review of Work–Family Research in the Nordic Region
from Part IV - Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Part I Overview
- Part II Assessing Cultural and Structural Differences
- Part III Methodological Considerations
- Part IV Review of Research in Regions across the Globe
- 13 A Review of Work–Family Research in Western and Southern Europe
- 14 A Review of Work–Family Research in Central and Eastern Europe
- 15 A Review of Work–Family Research in the Nordic Region
- 16 A Review of Work–Family Research in Latin America
- 17 A Review of Work–Family Research in Africa
- 18 A Review of Work–Family Research in the Middle East
- 19 A Review of Work–Family Research in South East Asia
- 20 A Review of Work–Family Research in Confucian Asia
- 21 A Review of Work–Family Research in Australia and New Zealand
- Part V Cultures within Cultures
- Part VI Organizational Perspectives
- Part VII Family Perspectives
- Part VIII Individual Perspectives
- Part IX Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
The Nordic countries are characterized by a “dual-worker/dual-carer model” in which a majority of both women and men are engaged in paid work, but also take actively part in the upbringing of their children. Still, work-family conflict is an issue in the Nordic countries, and it remains unclear whether women and men in these countries perceive less, more, or the same amount of work-family conflict compared to women and men elsewhere. Research in the Nordic countries include effects of work-family enrichment, the importance of organizational culture, and the negative health effects of work-family conflict. Future research areas suggested include antecedents of work-family enrichment, the meaning of high expectations regarding the combinability of work and family demands, the use of objective health register data as a complement to questionnaire data, consequences of the increasing flexibility in working life, and obstacles and facilitators regarding the compatibility of work and family in female- and male-dominated sectors.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the Global Work–Family Interface , pp. 288 - 302Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abrahamsen, B. (1991). Pleiearbeid og helse. Daglige belastninger, slitasjelidelser og sykefravaer blant hjelpepleiere (Nursing and health. Daily work load, musculoskeletal health problems and sickness absence among state enrolled nurses). ISF-Report 91/6. Oslo: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Albertsen, K., Persson, R., Garde, A. H., & Rugulies, R. (2010). Psychosocial determinants of work-to-family conflict among knowledge workers with boundaryless work. Applied Psychology: Health and Well Being, 2(2), 160–181.Google Scholar
Albrecht, S. C., Kecklund, G., Tucker, P., & Leineweber, C. (2016). Investigating the factorial structure and availability of work time control in a representative sample of the Swedish working population. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 44(3), 320–328.Google Scholar
Alexanderson, K., Björkenstam, A., Kjeldgård, L., Narusyte, J., Ropponen, A., & Svedberg, P. (2013). Barnafödande, sjuklighet och sjukfrånvaro: En studie av tvillingsystrar [Childbirth, illness and sickness absence: A study of twin sisters]. Retrieved from Karolinska Institutet: http://ki.se/sites/default/files/rapporten_barnafodande.pdfGoogle Scholar
Allvin, M., Mellner, C., Movitz, F., & Aronsson, G. (2013). The diffusion of flexibility: Estimating the incidence of low-regulated working conditions. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 3(3), 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björklund, A. (1991). Vem får sjukpenning? En empirisk analys av sjukfrånvarons bestämningsfaktorer (Who receives sickness benefits? An empirical analysis of the determinants of sickness absence). Arbetskraft, arbetsmarknad och produktivitet, Extrarapport no 4, 285–299.Google Scholar
Blank, N., & Diderichsen, F. (1995). Short-term and long-term sick-leave in Sweden: relationships with social circumstances, working conditions and gender. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 23(4), 265–272.Google Scholar
Boye, K. (2011). Work and well-being in a comparative perspective – the role of family policy. European Sociological Review, 72(1), 16–30.Google Scholar
Boye, K., & Nermo, M. (2014). Lönsamt arbete: Familjeansvarets fördelning och konsekvenser [Gainful employment: Family responsibility and it’s distribution and consequenses]. Forskningsrapport till Delegationen för jämställdhet i arbetslivet [Research report for the Delegation for equality at work]: Statens offentliga utredningar [Governmental report].Google Scholar
Bratberg, E., Dahl, S.-Å., & Erling, R. A. (2002). “The double burden”: do combinations of career and family obligations increase sickness absence among women? European Sociological Review, 18(2), 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, T. (2009). Work life and mental well-being: single and coupled employed mothers in Southern Europe and Scandinavia. Global Health Promotion, 16(3), 6–16. doi:10.1177/1757975909339674Google Scholar
Casper, W. J., Eby, L. T., Bordeaux, C., Lockwood, A., & Lambert, D. (2007). A review of research method in IO/OB work–family research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 28–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crompton, R., & Lyonette, C. (2006). Work–life ‘balance’ in Europe. Acta Sociologica, 49(4), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demerouti, E., Derks, D., ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). New ways of working: Impact on working conditions, work–family balance, and well-being. In Korunka, C. & Hoonakker, P. (Eds.), The impact of ICT on quality of life. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Duran, M.-A. (2015). The Contribution of Unpaid Work to Global Wellbeing: Exploration of Well-Being of Nations and Continents. In Glatzer, W., Camfield, L., Møller, V., & Rojas, M. (Eds.), Global Handbook of Quality of Life (pp. 381–411). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edlund, J., & Öun, I. (2016). Who should work and who should care? Attitudes towards the desirable division of labour between mothers and fathers in five European countries. Acta Sociologica, 59(2), 151–169.Google Scholar
Ellingsaeter, A.L., & Leira, A. (2006). Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia. Bristol: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvin-Nowak, Y. (1999). Accompanied by guilt: Modern motherhood the Swedish way. (Doctoral dissertation), Stockholm University Stockholm.Google Scholar
Eurofound. (2010). Absence from work – Denmark. Retrieved from http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/print/observatories/eurwork/comparative-information/national-contributions/denmark/absence-from-work-denmarkGoogle Scholar
Eurostat. (2009). Reconciliation between work, private and family life in the European Union. Statistical book.Google Scholar
Falkenberg, H. (2010). How privatization and corporatization affect healthcare employees’ work climate, work attitudes and ill-health: Implications of social status. (Doctoral dissertation), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Försäkringskassan. (2013). Kvinnors sjukfrånvaro. [Sickness absence among women]. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.Google Scholar
Gonäs, L., Johansson, S., & Svärd, I. (1997). Lokala utfall av den offentliga sektorns omvandling [Local outcomes of public sector transformation]. In Rapport till Utredningen om fördelning av ekonomisk makt och ekonomiska resurser mellan kvinnor och män [Report to the commission on the distribution of economic power and economic resources between women and men]. Statens offentliga utredningar [Governmental report]Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92. doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guest, D. E. (2002). Work–life balance within a European perspective: issues arising in the symposium discussion. Social Science Information, 41(2), 319–322.Google Scholar
Haas, L., Allard, K., & Hwang, P. (2002). The impact of organizational culture on men’s use of parental leave in Sweden. Community, Work & Family, 5(3), 319–342.Google Scholar
Hakanen, J. J., Peeters, M. C. W., & Perhoniemi, R. (2011). Enrichment processes and gain spirals at work and at home: A 3-year cross-lagged panel study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 8–30.Google Scholar
Hammer, L. B., Neal, M. B., Newsom, J. T., Brockwood, K. J., & Colton, C. L. (2005). A longitudinal study of the effects of dual-earner couples’ utilization of family-friendly workplace supports on work and family outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 799–810. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.90.4.799Google Scholar
Hansen, H. T. (1996). Trygd: en midlertidig bro, eller en vei ut av arbeidsmarkedet (Social insurance: a temporary bridge, or a road out of the labour market)? (Doctoral thesis), University of Bergen, Norway, Bergen.Google Scholar
Hanson, L. L., Leineweber, C., Chungkham, H. S., & Westerlund, H. (2014). Work–home interference and its prospective relation to major depression and treatment with antidepressants. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 40(1), 66–73. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innstrand, S. T., Melbye Langballe, E., Espnes, G. A., Falkum, E., & Gjerløw Aasland, O. (2008). Postive and negative work–family interaction and burnout: A longitudinal study of reciprocal relations. Work & Stress, 22(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Johansson, G. (2002). Work–life balance: the case of Sweden in the 1990s. Social Science Information, 41(2), 303–317. doi:10.1177/0539018402041002007Google Scholar
Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., Geurts, S. A. E., & Pulkkinen, L. (2006). Types of work–family interface: Well-being correlates of negative and positive spillover between work and family. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47(2), 149–162. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9450.2006.00502.xGoogle Scholar
Kinnunen, U., Geurts, S. A. E., & Mauno, S. (2004). Work-to-family conflict and its relationship with satisfaction and well-being: a one-year longitudinal study on gender differences. Work & Stress, 18(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lallukka, T., Arber, S., Laaksonen, M., Lahelma, E., Partonen, T., & Rahkonen, O. (2013). Work–family conflicts and subsequent sleep medication among women and men. A longitudinal registry linkage study. Social Science and Medicine, 79, 66–75.Google Scholar
Lallukka, T., Chandola, T., Roos, E., Cable, N., Sekine, M., Kagamimori, S., Tatsue, T., Marmot, M., Lahelma, E. (2010). Work–family conflicts and health behaviors among British, Finnish, and Japanese employees. International Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 17, 134–142.Google Scholar
Lallukka, T., Rahkonen, O., Lahelma, E., & Arber, S. (2010). Sleep complaints in middle-aged women and men: the contribution of working conditions and work–family conflicts. Journal of Sleep Research, 19(3), 466–477. doi:10.1111/j.1365–2869.2010.00821.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leineweber, C., Baltzer, M., Magnusson Hanson, L. L., & Westerlund, H. (2013). Work–family conflict and health in Swedish working women and men: a 2-year prospective analysis (the SLOSH study). European Journal of Public Health, 23(4), 710–716. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cks064Google Scholar
Leira, A. (2006). Parenthood change and policy reform in Scandinavia, 1970s-2000s. In Ellingsaeter, A. L. & Leira, A. (Eds.), Politics Parenthood in Scandinavia: Gender relations in welfare states (pp. 27–51). Bristol: The University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidwall, U., Bill, S., Palmer, E., & Bohlin Olsson, C. (2014). Sjukfrånvaro i psykiska diagnoser. [Sickness absence due to mental diagnoses]. Vol. 4. Socialförsäkringsrapport (Social Insurance Report). Stockholm: Försäkringskassan.Google Scholar
Lidwall, U., Marklund, S., & Voss, M. (2010). Work–family interference and long-term sickness absence: a longitudinal cohort study. European Journal of Public Health, 20(6), 676–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mastekaasa, A. (2000). Parenthood, gender and sickness absence. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 1827–1842.Google Scholar
Mauno, S. (2010). Effects of work–family culture on employee well-being: Exploring moderator effects in a longitudinal sample. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(6), 675–195.Google Scholar
Mauno, S., De Cuyper, N., Kinnunen, U., Ruokolainen, M., Rantanen, J., & Mäkikangas, A. (2015). The prospective effects of work–family conflict and enrichment on job exhaustion and turnvover intentions: comparing long-term temporary vs. permanent workers across three waves. Work & Stress, 29(1), 75–94.Google Scholar
Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Piitulainen, S. (2005). Work–family culture in four organisations in Finland: Examining antecedents and outcomes. Community, Work & Family, 8(2), 115–140.Google Scholar
Mäkelä, L., Bergbom, B., Tanskanen, J., & Kinnunen, U. (2014). The relationship between international business travel and sleep problems via work–family conflict. Career Development International, 19(7), 794–812. doi:10.1108/CDI-04–2014-0048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordic Council of Ministers. (2014). Nordic Statistical Yearbook. Retrieved from Copenhagen: http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:763002/FULLTEXT07.pdfGoogle Scholar
Nordic Social Statistical Committee. (2015). Sickness absence in the Nordic countries. Retrieved from Copenhagen: http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:811504/FULLTEXT06.pdfGoogle Scholar
Nylen, L., Melin, B., & Laflamme, L. (2007). Interference between work and outside-work demands relative to health: unwinding possibilities among full-time and part-time employees. International Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 14(4), 229–236.Google Scholar
Öun, I. (2012). Work–family conflict in the Nordic countries: A comparative analysis. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43(2), 165–184.Google Scholar
Rantanen, J., Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., & Pulkkinen, L. (2008). Work–family conflict and psychological well-being: Stability and cross-lagged relations within one- and six-year follow-up. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 37–51.Google Scholar
Rapp, B., & Jackson, P. (2013). Organisation and Work Beyond 2000. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Richter, A., Schraml, K., & Leineweber, C. (2015). Work–family conflict, emotional exhaustion and performance-based self-esteem: reciprocal relationships. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 88(1), 103–112. doi:10.1007/s00420-014–0941-xGoogle Scholar
Roos, E., Lahelma, E., & Rahkonen, O. (2006). Work–family conflicts and drinking behaviours among employed women and men. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 83, 49–56.Google Scholar
Roos, E., Sarlio-Lähteenkorva, S., Lallukka, T., & Lahelma, E. (2007). Associations of work–family conflicts with food habits and physical activity. Public Health Nutrition, 10(3), 222–229. doi:10.1017/S1368980007248487CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rostgaard, T. (2014). Family Policies in Scandinavia. Retrieved from Aalborg University, Denmark: http://vbn.aau.dk/da/publications/family-policies-in-scandinavia(471991a9-8288-4610-a50a-cd45fdb50290).htmlGoogle Scholar
Ruppanner, L. (2013). Conflict between work and family: An investigation of four policy measures. Social Indicators Research, 110, 327–347.Google Scholar
Statistics Norway. (2016). Sickness absence, Q2 2016. Retrieved from www.ssb.no/en/sykefratot/Google Scholar
Statistics Sweden. (2014). På tal om kvinnor och män – Lathund om jämställdhet 2014 [Women and men in Sweden 2014 – Facts and figures]. Retrieved from Örebro: www.scb.se/statistik/_publikationer/le0201_2013b14_br_x10br1401.pdfGoogle Scholar
Stier, H., Lewin-Epstein, N., & Braun, M. (2012). Work–family conflict in comparative perspective: The role of social policies. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(3), 255–279.Google Scholar
Strandh, M., & Nordenmark, M. (2006). The interference of paid work with household demands in different social policy contexts: perceived work-household conflict in Sweden, the UK, the Netherlands, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(4), 597–617.Google Scholar
Sverke, M., Falkenberg, H., Kecklund, G., Magnusson Hanson, L., & Lindfors, P. (2016). Women and men and their working conditions: The importance of organizational and psychosocial factors for work-related and health-related outcomes. Report 2016: 2 Eng. Stockholm: Swedish Work Environment Authority. Retrieved from: https://www.av.se/en/work-environment-work-and-inspections/knowledge-compilations/women-and-men-and-their-working-conditions/Google Scholar
Van der Lippe, T., Jager, A., & Kops, Y. (2006). Combination pressure: The paid work–family balance of men and women in European countries. Acta Sociologica, 49(3), 303–319. doi:10.1177/0001699306067711Google Scholar
Vogel, J., Kindlund, H., & Diderichsen, F. (1992). Arbetsförhållanden, ohälsa och sjukfrånvaro 1975–1989. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.Google Scholar
Voss, M., Josephson, M., Stark, S., Vaez, M., Alexanderson, K., Alfredsson, L., & Vingard, E. (2008). The influence of household work and of having children on sickness absence among publicly employed women in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 36(6), 564–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Väänänen, A., Kevin, M. V., Ala-Mursula, L., Pentti, J., Kivimäki, M., & Vahtera, J. (2005). The double burden of and the negative spillover between paid and domestic work: Associations with health among men and women. Women and Health, 40(3), 1–18. doi:10.1300/J013c40n03_01CrossRefGoogle Scholar