Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T01:10:14.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Ontogeny of Tactical Deception

from Part V - Evolution and Cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2020

By
Peter J. LaFreniere  and
Rachelle M. Smith
Edited by
Lance Workman ,
Will Reader  and
Jerome H. Barkow
Lance Workman
Affiliation:
University of South Wales
Will Reader
Affiliation:
Sheffield Hallam University
Jerome H. Barkow
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia
Get access

Summary

Years ago, we began a research program in the development of deliberate tactical deception because we felt that deception was central to the evolution of human social intelligence. We were also convinced that it was central to a successful social life in the modern era, particularly the ability to unmask deception masquerading as benevolence or cooperation. This is the pith of the Machiavellian Hypothesis that came to the forefront of evolutionary thinking in the 1980s (e.g., Byrne & Whiten, 1988; Humphrey, 1976). Now, 40 years later, we review the empirical case for its progressive development in children.

We view this essential question regarding the ontogeny of deception within a broader framework of interrelated questions. In his influential paper, “On the Aims and Methods of Ethology” (1963), Tinbergen gave the discipline of ethology a strong and enduring paradigm.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior , pp. 225 - 232
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkow, J. H. (1989). Darwin, Sex and Status: Biological Approaches to Mind and Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (2005). The empathizing system: A revision of the 1994 model of the mindreading system. In Ellis, B. J. & Bjorklund, D. F., eds., Origins of the Social Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and Child Development. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 468–492.Google Scholar
Bering, J. M., & Povinelli, D. J. (2003). Comparing cognitive development. In Maestripieri, D., ed., Primate Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 205–233.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. W., & Whiten, A. (1988). Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans. New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 187–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandler, M., Fritz, A., & Hala, S. (1989). Small-scale deceit: Deception as a marker of two-, three-, and four-year-olds’ early theories of mind. Child Development, 60, 1263–1277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. R. (1978). Animal signals: Information or manipulation? In Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B., eds., Behavioral Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publishers, pp. 282–309.Google Scholar
Debey, E., De Schryver, M., Logan, G. D., Suchotzki, K., & Verschuere, B. (2015). From junior to senior Pinocchio: A cross-sectional lifespan investigation of deception. Acta Psychologica, 160, 58–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the Face. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Evans, A. D., & Lee, K. (2013). Emergence of lying in very young children. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1958–1963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R. S., Jenkins, L., & Popoola, O. (1979). Detection of deception in adults and children via facial expressions. Child Development, 50, 350–355.Google Scholar
Freire, A., Eskritt, M., & Lee, K. (2004). Are eyes windows to a deceiver’s soul? Children’s use of another’s eye gaze cues in a deceptive situation. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1093–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosselin, P., Warren, M., & Diotte, M. (2002). Motivation to hide emotion and children’s understanding of the distinction between real and apparent emotions. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(4), 479–495.Google Scholar
Griffith, S. B., trans. (1963). The Art of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hala, S., Chandler, M., & Fritz, A. S. (1991). Fledgling theories of mind: Deception as a marker of three-year-olds’ understanding of false belief. Child Development, 62(1), 83–97.Google Scholar
Humphrey, N. (1976). The social function of intellect. In Bateson, P. P. G. & Hinde, R. A., eds., Growing Points in Ethology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 303–317.Google Scholar
Josephs, I. E. (1993). The Regulation of Emotional Expression in Preschool Children. Münster, NY: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Josephs, I. E. (1994). Display rule behavior and understanding in preschool children. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18(4), 301–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFreniere, P. J. (1988a). L’evolution at la function de la tromperie. Anthropologie et Societes, 12(3), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFreniere, P. J. (1988b). The ontogeny of tactical deception in humans. In Byrne, R. & Whiten, A., eds., Evolution of Social Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 238–252.Google Scholar
LaFreniere, P. J. (1998). Card sharks and poker faces: Links between developmental research on deception and evolutionary models. Presented at the International Society for Human Ethology, Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
LaFreniere, P. J., & Ménard, J. M. (1990). Le développement de la tromperie tactique chez le jeune enfant. Enfance, 45(4), 361–373.Google Scholar
Lewis, M., Stanger, C., & Sullivan, M. W. (1989). Deception in 3-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 439–443.Google Scholar
Lockard, J. S., & Paulhus, D. S. (1988). Self-Deception: An Adaptive Mechanism. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. W. (1986). A framework for discussing deception. In Mitchell, R. W. & Thompson, N. S., eds., Deception: Perspectives on Human and Nonhuman Deceit. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 3–40.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen Eighty-Four. London: Martin Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Owings, D. H., & Morton, E. S. (1998). Animal Vocal Communication: A New Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinelli, D. J., & O’Neill, D. K. (2000). Do chimpanzees use their gestures to instruct each other? In Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. J., eds., Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 459–487.Google Scholar
Premack, D. (1988). “Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind” revisited. In Byrne, R. W. & Whiten, A., eds., Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 160–179.Google Scholar
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526.Google Scholar
Reddy, V. (2007). Getting back to the rough ground: Deception and ‘social living’. In Emery, N., Nicola, C., & Frith, C., eds., Social Intelligence: From Brain to Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 219–244.Google Scholar
Ruihe, H., & Guoliang, Y. (2006). Children’s understanding of emotional display rules and use of strategies. Psychological Science (China), 29(1), 18–21.Google Scholar
Saarni, C. (1984). An observational study of children’s attempts to monitor their expressive behavior. Child Development, 55(4), 1504–1513.Google Scholar
Schultz, T. R., & Cloghesy, K. (1981). Development of recursive awareness of intention. Developmental Psychology, 17(4), 465–471.Google Scholar
Smith, R., & LaFreniere, P. (2013). Development of tactical deception from 4 to 8 years of age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31, 30–41.Google Scholar
Sodian, B., & Schneider, W. (1990). Children’s understanding of cognitive cuing: How to manipulate cues to fool a competitor. Child Development, 61(3), 697–704.Google Scholar
Sodian, B., Taylor, C., Harris, P. L., & Perner, J. (1991). Early deception and the child’s theory of mind: False trails and genuine markers. Child Development, 62(3), 468–483.Google Scholar
Talwar, V., & Crossman, A. (2011). From little white lies to filthy liars: The evolution of honesty and deception in young children. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 40, 139–179.Google Scholar
Talwar, V., & Lee, K. (2008). Social and cognitive correlates of children’s lying behavior. Child Development, 79, 866–881.Google Scholar
Talwar, V., Gordon, H. M., & Lee, K. (2007). Lying in the elementary school years: Verbal deception and its relation to second-order belief understanding. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 804–810.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1951). The Study of Instinct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Ethology, 20(4), 410–433.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (1976). Forward. In Dawkins, R., ed., The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (2000). The elements of a scientific theory of self-deception. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 907, 114–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, R. (2012). The Folly of Fools: The Logic of Deceit and Self-Deception in Human Life. Philadelphia, PA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
von Hippel, W., & Trivers, R. (2011). The evolution and psychology of self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 16–56.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684.Google Scholar
Woodruff, G., & Premack, D. (1979). Intentional communication in the chimpanzee: The development of deception. Cognition, 7(4), 333–362.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×