Adams, G., Anderson, S. L., & Adonu, J. K. (2004). The cultural grounding of closeness and intimacy. In Mashek, D. & Aron, A. (Eds.), The handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 321–339). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Agnew, C. R. (1999). Power over interdependent behavior within the dyad: Who decides what a couple does? In Severy, L. J. & Miller, W. (Eds.), Advances in population: Psychosocial perspectives (Vol. 3, pp. 163–188). London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar

Agnew, C. R., & South, S. C. (Eds.) (2014). Interpersonal relationships and health: social and clinical psychological mechanisms. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the cognitive representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939–954.Google Scholar

Allgood, S. M., Harris, S., Skogrand, L., & Lee, T. R. (2009). Marital commitment and religiosity in a religiously homogenous population. Marriage & Family Review, 45, 52–67.Google Scholar

Amadiume, I. (2002). Bodies, choices, globalizing neocolonial enchantments: African matriarchs and mammy water. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism, 2, 41–66.Google Scholar

Anderson, C., & Galinksy, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536.Google Scholar

Applbaum, K. D. (1995). Marriage with the proper stranger: Arranged marriage in metropolitan Japan. Ethnology, 34, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, E. H., Sanchez, L. A., Nock, S. L., & Wright, J. D. (2009). Covenant marriage and the sanctification of gendered marital roles. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 137–178.Google Scholar

Baker, R., Kiger, G., & Riley, P. J. (1996). Time, dirt, and money: The effects of gender, gender ideology, and type of earner marriage on time, house-hold task, and economic satisfaction among couples with children. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 161–177.Google Scholar

Banks, R. R. (2011). Is marriage for white people? How the African American marriage decline affects everyone. New York: Dutton/Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Barone, R. P., Wolgemuth, J. R., & Linder, C. (2007). Preventing sexual assault through engaging college men. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 585–594.Google Scholar

Barrett, A. E. (2000). Marital trajectories and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 451–64.Google Scholar

Berman, M. I., & Frazier, P. A. (2005). Relationship power and betrayal experience as predictors of reactions to infidelity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1617–1627.Google Scholar

Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.Google Scholar

Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar

Bond, M. H. (2007). Culture and collective violence: How good people, usually men, do bad things. In Drozdek, B. & Wilson, J. P. (Eds.), Voices of trauma: Treating survivors across cultures (pp. 27–57). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Bowles, H. R., & McGinn, K. L. (2008). Untapped potential in the study of negotiation and gender inequality in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 99–132.Google Scholar

Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.Google Scholar

Butler, J. P. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carson, R. C. (1969). Interaction concepts in personality. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Chen, Z., Fiske, S. T., & Lee, T. L. (2009). Ambivalent sexism and power-related gender-role ideology in marriage. Sex Roles, 60, 765–778.Google Scholar

Cherlin, A. (1992). Marriage, cohabitation, sexual behavior, and childbearing in North America. In The peopling of the Americas (Vol. 3, pp. 223–243). Liège, Belgium: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population.Google Scholar

Choi, S. Y. P., & Ting, K. (2008). Wife beating in South Africa: An imbalance theory of resources and power. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 834–852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201–234). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Collins, P. H. (1991). The meaning of motherhood in Black culture and Black mother–daughter relationships. In Bell-Scott, P., Guy-Sheftall, P. B., Royster, J. J., Sims-Wood, J., Decosta-Willis, M., & Fultz, L. (Eds.), Double stitch: Black women write about mothers and daughters (pp. 42–60). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Connell, R. (1987). Gender and power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Cook, K. S., & Gillmore, M. R. (1984). Power, dependence, and coalitions. In Lawler, E. J. (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 1, pp. 27–58). Greenwich: JAI.Google Scholar

Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2000). Power couples: Changes in the locational choice of the college educated, 1940–1990. Recent Developments in Urban and Regional Economics 182, 263–291.Google Scholar

Cox, C. L., Wexler, M. O., Rusbult, C. E., & Gaines, S. O. Jr. (1997). Prescriptive support and commitment processes in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, M. (2004). Mars and Venus collide: A discursive analysis of marital self-help psychology. Feminism & Psychology, 14, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, A., Schmader, T., & Block, K. (2015). An underexamined inequality: Cultural and psychological barriers to men's engagement with communal roles. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 343–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davis, L. E., Williams, J. H., Emerson, S., & Hourd-Bryant, M. (2000). Factors contributing to partner commitment among unmarried African Americans. Social Work Research, 24, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demo, D. H., & Acock, A. C. (1996). Singlehood, marriage and remarriage: The effects of family structure and family relationships on mothers’ well-being. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 388–407.Google Scholar

DePaulo, B. (2006). Singled out: How singles are stereotyped, stigmatized, and ignored, and still live happily ever after. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Dohm, A., & Wyatt, I. (2002). College at work: Outlook and earnings for college graduates, 2000-10. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 46, 3–15.Google Scholar

Dunbar, N. E. (2000). Explication and initial test of dyadic power theory. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 2993–3126.Google Scholar

Dunbar, N. E. (2004). Dyadic power theory: Constructing a communication-based theory of relational power. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 235–248.Google Scholar

Dunbar, N. E., & Burgoon, J. K. (2005). Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 207–233.Google Scholar

Duncan, C., & Loretto, W. (2004). Never the right age? Gender and age-based discrimination in employment. Gender, Work and Organization, 11, 95–115.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H. (1987). The analysis of sex differences in social behavior: A new theory and a new method. In Eagly, A. H. (Ed.), Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation (pp. 7–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of human sex differences: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.Google Scholar

Edin, K. (2000). What do low-income single mothers say about marriage? Social Problems, 47, 112–133.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. E., & Moskoff, W. (1983). Decision-making power in Romanian families. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 14, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, S. (Ed.). (2001). Shifting the center: Understanding contemporary families. Mountain View: Mayfield Publishing.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T., & Molm, L. D. (2010). Bridging inequality from both sides now. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 341–346.Google Scholar

Flanagan, J. (2009, April 25). Numbers gap and a crazy sex ratio in Beijing. Retrieved from http://www.healthintelasia.com/numbers-gap-and-a-crazy-sex-ratio-in-beijing/Google Scholar

French, J. R. P. Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in social power. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar

Fu, X. (2008). Interracial marriage and family socio-economic well-being: Equal status exchange or caste status exchange? The Social Science Journal, 45, 132–155.Google Scholar

Furnée, C. A., Groot, W., & Pfann, G. A. (2011). Health and income: A meta-analysis to explore cross-country, gender, and age differences. European Journal of Public Health, 21, 775–780.Google Scholar

Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450–1466.Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Journal of Personality, 58, 69–96.Google Scholar

Ganguly-Scrase, R. (2003). Paradoxes of globalization, liberalization, and gender equality: The worldviews of the lower middle class in West Bengal, India. Gender & Society, 17, 544–566.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1968). Power in the recent writings of Talcott Parsons. Sociology, 2, 257–272.Google Scholar

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.Google Scholar

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gorman, E. H., & Kmec, J. A. (2009). Hierarchical rank and women's organizational mobility: Glass ceilings in corporate law firms. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 1428–74.Google Scholar

Gray, J. (1992). Men are from mars, women are from venus. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A. (2000). Gender, power, and difference: Reconfiguring law from Bakwena women's perspectives. Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 23, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Ackerman, J. M., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., & White, A. E. (2012). The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 69–80.Google Scholar

Guerrero, M. A. J. (1997). Civil rights versus sovereignty: Native American women in life and land struggles. In Alexander, M. J. & Mohanty, C. T. (Eds.), Feminist Genealogies, colonial legacies, democratic futures (pp. 101–121). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Guinote, A. (2007). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076–1087.Google Scholar

Guttentag, M., & Secord, P. F. (1983). Too many women? The sex ratio question. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar

Halpern, C. T., Young, M. L., Waller, M. W., Martin, S. L., & Kupper, L. L. (2004). Prevalence of partner violence in same-sex romantic and sexual relationships in a national sample of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 124–131.Google Scholar

Harman, J. J., & Biringen, Z. (2016). Parents acting badly: How institutions and societies promote the alienation of children from their loving families. Fort Collins: Colorado Parental Alienation Project, LLC.Google Scholar

Harman, J. J., Kaufman, M. R., Aoki, E., & Trott, C. D. (2014). Sexual network partners in Tanzania: Labels, power, and the systemic muting of women's health and identity. In Pishwa, H. & Schulze, R. (Eds.), Expression of inequality in interaction: Power, dominance, and status, pp. 49–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Harman, J. J., Smith, V. E., & Egan, L. C. (2007). The impact of incarceration on intimate relationships. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 794–815.Google Scholar

Harry, J. (1984). Gay couples. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Harry, J., & DeVall, W. B. (1978). The social organization of gay males. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Harvey, S. M., Beckman, L. J., & Bird, S. T. (2003). Feeling powerful in heterosexual relationships: Cultural beliefs among couples of Mexican origin. Culture, Health, & Sexuality, 5, 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, A. K., Hunt, J., Welling, L. L. M., Cárdenas, R. A., Rotella, M. A., Wheatley, J. R., … Puts, D. A. (2013). Quantifying the strength and form of sexual selection on men's traits. Evolution & Human Behavior, 34, 334–341.Google Scholar

Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Hunnicutt, G. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting “patriarchy” as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15, 553–573.Google Scholar

Huston, T. L. (1983). Power. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christenses, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Paplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 169–219). New York: Freeman.Google Scholar

Ickes, W. (1993). Traditional gender roles: Do they make, and then break, our relationships? Journal of Social Issues, 49, 71–85.Google Scholar

ILO Socio-Economic Security Programme. (n.d.). Fact sheet no. 4: Women face more economic insecurity: Cumulative disadvantages intensify gender divide. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/ses/download/docs/sheet_no4.pdf.Google Scholar

Izraeli, D. N. (1983). Sex effects or structural effects? An empirical test of Kanter's theory of proportions. Social Forces, 62, 153–165.Google Scholar

Jemmott, J. B., Ashby, K. L., & Lindenfeld, K. (1989). Romantic commitment and the perceived availability of opposite-sex persons: On loving the one you're with. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1198–1211.Google Scholar

Kalmijn, M. (2005). The effects of divorce on men's unemployment and social security histories. European Journal of Population, 21, 347–366.Google Scholar

Kang, X. (2006). The cult of the fox: Power, gender, and religion in late imperial and modern China. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Karakurt, G., & Cumbie, T. (2012). The relationship between egalitarianism, dominance, and violence in intimate relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 27, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kelley, H. H. (1983). Close relationships. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978) Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar

Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ketchen, B., Armistead, L., & Cook, S. (2009). HIV infection, stressful life events, and intimate relationship power: The moderating role of community resources for Black South African women. Women & Health, 49, 197–214.Google Scholar

Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472–503.Google Scholar

Kim, J. S., Griskevicius, V., & Simpson, J. (2011, January). Sex ratio and relationship maintenance: An experimental approach. Address presented at the 12th annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar

Kirchler, E. (1989). Kaufentscheidungen im Privaten Haushalt. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar

Kjøs, P., Tjersland, O. A., & Roen, K. (2014). The mediation window: Regulation of argumentation and affect in custody mediation. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 55, 527–538.Google Scholar

Klawitter, M. (2008). The effects of sexual orientation and marital status on how couples hold their money. Review of Economics of the Household, 6, 423–446.Google Scholar

Klunklin, A., & Greenwood, J. (2005). Buddhism, the status of women, and the spread of HIV/AIDS in Thailand. Health Care for Women International, 26, 46–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Knudsen, K., & Wærness, K. (2008). National context and spouses’ housework in 34 countries. European Sociological Review, 24, 97–113.Google Scholar

Knudsen, K., & Wærness, K. (2009). Shared or separate: Money management and changing norms of gender equality among Norwegian couples. Community, Work & Family, 12, 39–55.Google Scholar

Knudson-Martin, C. (2013). Why power matters: Creating a foundation of mutual support in couple relationships. Family Processes, 52, 5–18.Google Scholar

Knudson-Martin, C., & Mahoney, A. R. (2009). Couples, gender, and power: Creating change in intimate relationships. New York: Springer Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Kompter, A. (1989). Hidden power in marriage. Gender and Society, 3, 187–216.Google Scholar

Kotla, H. (2011, April). India's skewed sex ratio: Seven brothers. The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/18530371Google Scholar

Kreager, D. A., & Staff, J. (2009). The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 143–164.Google Scholar

Kruger, D. J., Fitzgerald, C. J., & Peterson, T. (2010). Female scarcity reduces women's marital ages and increases variance in men's marital ages. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 420–431.Google Scholar

Kruger, D. J., & Schlemmer, E. (2009). Male scarcity is differentially related to male marital likelihood across the life course. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 280–287.Google Scholar

Kubicek, K., McNeeley, M., & Collins, S. (2015). Same-sex relationship in a straight world: Individual and societal influences on power and control in young men's relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 83–109.Google Scholar

Lachance-Grzela, M., & Bouchard, G. (2010). Why do women do the lion's share of the housework? A decade of research. Sex Roles, 63, 767–780.Google Scholar

Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships 10, 37–57.Google Scholar

Lee, K. (2001). China's growing problem of too many men. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/china/2011/05/13/chinas-growing-problem-of-too-many-single-men/.Google Scholar

Lee, I., Pratto, F., & Johnson, B. T. (2011). Intergroup consensus/disagreement in support of group-based hierarchy: An examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural factors. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 1029–1064.Google Scholar

Lehmiller, J. J. (2010). Differences in relationship investments between gay and heterosexual men. Personal Relationships, 17, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehmiller, J. J., & Agnew, C. R. (2008). Commitment in age-gap heterosexual romantic relationships: A test of evolutionary and socio-cultural predictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 74–82.Google Scholar

Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E., & Kelly, J. R. (2011). Sex differences in approaching friends with benefits relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 275–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lennon, C. A., Stewart, A. L., & Ledermann, T. (2012). The role of power in intimate relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 95–114.Google Scholar

Little, B., & Terrance, C. (2010). Perceptions of domestic violence in lesbian relationships: Stereotypes and gender role expectations. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 429–440.Google Scholar

MacDonald, K. B. (1991). A perspective on Darwinian psychology: The importance of domain-general mechanisms, plasticity, and individual differences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 449–480.Google Scholar

Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52, 175–186.Google Scholar

Marks, N. F., & Lambert, J. D. (1998). Marital status continuity and change among young and midlife adults: Longitudinal effects on psychological well-being. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 652–686.Google Scholar

Medicine, B. (2001). Learning to be an anthropologist & remaining “native”. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Meier, K., Kirchler, E., & Hubert, A. (1999). Savings and investment decisions within private households: Spouses’ dominance in decisions on various forms of investment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20, 99–519.Google Scholar

Mikula, G. (1998). Justice in the family – multiple perspectives in the division of labor: Introduction. Social Justice Research, 11, 211–213.Google Scholar

Molm, L. D. (1997). Coercive power in social exchange. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moskowitz, D. S. (2010). Quarrelsomeness in daily life. Journal of Personality, 78, 39–66.Google Scholar

Müller, U. (1998). The micropolitics of gender differences in family life. In Ferreira, V., Tavares, T., & Portugal, S. (Eds.), Shifting bonds, shifting bounds (pp. 329–344). Oeiras: Celta Editora.Google Scholar

Musaiger, A. O., & D'Souza, R. (2009). Role of age and gender in the perception of aging: A community-based survey in Kuwait. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 48, 50–57.Google Scholar

Nakonezny, P. A., & Denton, W. H. (2008). Marital relationships: A social exchange theory perspective. American Journal of Family Therapy, 36, 402–412.Google Scholar

National Spiritual Assembly of the Ba’ Hai of the United States (2013). Spiritual concepts. Retrieved from http://www.bahai.us/welcome/spiritual-concepts/Google Scholar

Naved, R. T., & Persson, L. A. (2010). Dowry and spousal physical violence against women in Bangladesh. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 830–856.Google Scholar

Netting, N. S. (2010). Marital ideoscapes in 21st-century India: Creative combinations of love and responsibility. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 707–726.Google Scholar

North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 982–997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Overall, N. C., Sibley, C. G., & Tan, R. (2011). The costs and benefits of sexism: Resistance to influence during relationship conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 271–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Overall, N. C., Hammond, M. D., McNulty, J. K., & Finkel, E. J. (2016). When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men's aggressive responses to low situational power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 195–217.Google Scholar

Oyamot, C. M., Fuglestad, P. T., & Snyder, M. (2010). Balance of power and influence in relationships: The role of self-monitoring. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 23–46.Google Scholar

Papp, L. M. (2010). The course and quality of intimate relationships among psychologically distressed mothers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80, 71–79.Google Scholar

Pedersen, F. A. (1991). Secular trends in human sex ratios: Their influence on individual and family behavior. Human Nature, 2, 271–291.Google Scholar

Peplau, L. A. (1979). Power in dating relationships. In Freeman, J. (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (2nd ed., pp. 106–121). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing.Google Scholar

Poeschl, G. (2008). Social norms and feelings of justice about unequal family practices. Social Justice Research, 21, 69–85.Google Scholar

Poortman, A. (2000). Sex differences in the economic consequences of separation: A panel study of the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 16, 1–17.Google Scholar

Population Reference Bureau. (2005). Marriage in the Arab world. Retrieved from http://www.igwg.org/pdf05/MarriageInArabWorld_Eng.pdfGoogle Scholar

Potoczniak, M. J., Murot, J. E., Crosbie-Burnett, M., & Potoczniak, D. J. (2003). Legal and psychological perspectives on same-sex domestic violence: A multisystemic approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 252–259.Google Scholar

Pratto, F., Lee, I., Tan, J. Y., & Pitpitan, E. V. (2011). Power basis theory: A psychoecological approach to power. In Dunning, D. (Ed.), Social motivation (pp. 191–222). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Pratto, F., & Walker, A. (2004). The bases of gendered power. In Eagly, A. H., Beall, A., & Sternberg, R. (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 242–268). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Prior, M. (2001). Matrifocality, power, and gender relations in Jamaica. In Brettell, C. B. & Sargent, C. F. (Eds.), Gender in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 371–379). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Qian, Z. (1997). Breaking the racial barriers: Variations in interracial marriage between 1980 and 1990. Demography, 34, 263–276.Google Scholar

Quisumbing, A. R., & Maluccio, J. A. (2003). Resources at marriage and intrahousehold allocation: Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, 283–327.Google Scholar

Raja, V. (2010). Intimacy, time, and scarcity: Drug-involved women account for secretly withholding financial capital in violent intimate relationships. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39, 131–158.Google Scholar

Raven, B. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 7, 217–244.Google Scholar

Raven, B. (2008). The bases of power and the power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8, 1–22.Google Scholar

Rich, A. (1976). Of women born: Motherhood experience and institution. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Richardson, D. (1993). Women, motherhood, and childrearing. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Rivers, J. J., & Josephs, R. A. (2010). Dominance and health: The role of social rank in physiology and illness. In Guinote, A. & Vescio, T. K. (Eds.), The social psychology of power (pp. 87–112). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Rodgers-Rose, L. (1980). The Black woman: A historical overview. In Rodgers-Rose, L. (Ed.), The black woman (pp. 15–25). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Rollins, B. C., & Bahr, S. J. (1976). A theory of power relationships in marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38, 619–627.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, M. J. (2005). A critique of exchange theory in mate selection. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1284–1325.Google Scholar

Rubin, J. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., & Conley, T. (2014). On the margins: Considering diversity among consensually non-monogamous relationships. Journal für Psychologie, 22, 1–23.Google Scholar

Rudman, L. A., Fetterolf, J. C., & Sanchez, D. T. (2013). What motivates the sexual double standard? More support for male versus female control theory. Personality and social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 250–263.Google Scholar

Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004–1010.Google Scholar

Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the Investment Model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., Agnew, C. R., & Arriaga, X. B. (2012). The Investment Model of Commitment Processes. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 218–231). Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Interdependence in close relationships. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Clark, M. S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 359–387). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558–571.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1996). Interdependence Processes. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 564–596). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–375.Google Scholar

Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A. (2012). Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 168–183.Google Scholar

Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–311.Google Scholar

Schrock, D., & Schwalbe, M. (2009). Men, masculinity, and manhood acts. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 277–295.Google Scholar

Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Simpson, J. A., Farrell, A. K., Orina, M. M., & Rothman, A. J. (2013). Power and social influence in relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.) APA handbook of personality and social psychology: vol. 2. interpersonal relations and group processes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.Google Scholar

Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1997). The balance of power in romantic heterosexual couples over time from “his” and “her” perspective. Sex Roles, 37, 361–379.Google Scholar

Staples, R. (1981). The myth of the Black matriarchy. Black Scholar, 12, 26–34.Google Scholar

StatsBee, (2012). Ratio of single men to single women. Retrieved from http://nycedc.tumblr.com/post/16175652438/ratio-of-single-men-to-single-women-in-nyc-newGoogle Scholar

Steil, J. M. (1997). Marital equality: Its relationship to the well-being of husbands and wives. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar

Steiner, I. D. (1986). Paradigms and groups. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 251–289). Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Stets, J. E. (1997). Status and identity in marital interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 185–217.Google Scholar

Strube, M. J. (1988). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 236–250.Google Scholar

Sutphin, S. T. (2010). Social exchange theory and the division of household labor in same sex couples. Marriage & Family Review, 46, 191–206.Google Scholar

The World Bank. (2008). Girls’ education in the 21st Century: Equality, empowerment, and growth. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources/278200-1099079877269/547664-1099080014368/DID_Girls_edu.pdf.Google Scholar

Thege, B. (2009). Rural Black women's agency within intimate partnerships amid the South African HIV epidemic. African Journal of AIDS Research, 8, 455–464.Google Scholar

Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley & Son.Google Scholar

Thitsa, K. (1983). Nuns, mediums and prostitutes in Chiang Mai: A study of some marginal categories of women. Occasional Paper No. 1. Kent, UK: University of Kent at Canterbury, Centre of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar

Tichenor, V. J. (1999). Status and income as gendered resources: The case of marital power. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 638–650.Google Scholar

Tichenor, V. (2005). Maintaining men's dominance: Negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles, 53, 191–205.Google Scholar

Uecker, J. E., & Regnerus, M. D. (2010). Bare market: Campus sex ratios, romantic relationships, and sexual behavior. The Sociological Quarterly, 51, 408–435.Google Scholar

US Census Bureau. (2011). More working women than men have college degrees, Census Bureau Reports. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/education/cb11-72.html.Google Scholar

Uunk, W. J. G. (2004). The economic consequences of divorce for women in the European Union: The impact of welfare state arrangements. European Journal of Population, 20, 251–285.Google Scholar

Van Willigen, M., & Drentea, P. (2001). Benefits of equitable relationships: The impact of sense of fairness, household division of labor, and decision making power on perceived social support. Sex Roles, 44, 571–597.Google Scholar

Vogler, C. (1998). Money in the household: Some underlying issues of power. The Sociological Review, 46, 687–713.Google Scholar

Waller, W., & Hill, R. (1951). The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Wong, D. (2012). Doing gender, doing culture: Division of domestic labour among lesbians in Hong Kong. Women's Studies International Forum, 35, 266–275.Google Scholar

Worell, J. (1988). Women's satisfaction in close relationships. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 477–498.Google Scholar

Whyte, M. K. (1978). The status of women in preindustrial societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Yan, Y. (2006). Girl power: Young women and the waning of patriarchy in rural North China. Ethnology, 45, 105–123.Google Scholar

Yusof, A., & Duasa, J. (2010). Household decision-making and expenditure patterns of married men and women in Malaysia. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31, 371–381.Google Scholar

Zhang, X. (2009). Fecundity and husband-wife education gaps at first marriage (Doctoral dissertation, Binghamton University). Retrieved from http://udini.proquest.com/view/fecundity-and-husband-wife-age-and-pqid:1917842381/Google Scholar

Zhou, L. (2006). American and Chinese college student's anticipation of their postgraduate education, career, and future family roles. Sex Roles, 55, 95–110.Google Scholar

Zhou, X., Dong, X. L., Wang, L., & Li, T. H. (2011). The very high sex ratio in rural China: Impact on the psychosocial wellbeing of unmarried men. Social Science & Medicine 73, 1422–1427.Google Scholar

Zipp, J. F., & Toth, J. (2002). She said, he said, they said: The impact of spousal presence in survey research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 177–208.Google Scholar

Zipp, J. F., Prohaska, A., & Bemiller, M. (2004). Wives, husbands, and hidden power in marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 933–958.Google Scholar