Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T01:29:09.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Graham Gee
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Robert Hazell
Affiliation:
University College London
Kate Malleson
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Patrick O'Brien
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Assembly and Executive Review Committee, Inquiry into the Devolution of Policing and Justice Matters: Evidence of David Lavery (22/07/08R (Session 2007–08) 2007)Google Scholar
Assembly and Executive Review Committee, Inquiry into the Devolution of Policing and Justice Matters: Evidence of Sir Brian Kerr (22/07/08R (Session 2007–08) 2007)Google Scholar
Cabinet Office, Executive Agencies: A Guide for Departments (2006)Google Scholar
Canadian Judicial Council, Alternative Models of Court Administration (Ottawa, ON, 2006)Google Scholar
Chen, A., The Determination and Revision of Judicial Remuneration (Hong Kong, Report for the Hong Kong Standing Committee on Judicial Salaries and Conditions of Service, 2008)Google Scholar
Church, T. W. and Sallmann, P., Governing Australia’s Courts (Carlton South, Vic., Australia, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, 1991)Google Scholar
Committee on Super-Injunctions, Super-Injunctions, Anonymised Injunctions and Open Justice (2011)Google Scholar
Commonwealth (Latimer House) Principles on the Three Branches of Government (2003)Google Scholar
Commonwealth Secretariat, Commonwealth Principles on the Accountability of and the Relationship between the Three Branches of Government ([S.1], Commonwealth Secretariat, 2003)Google Scholar
Concordat between: The Ministry of Justice (MOJ) and the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (The Court) (DEP2014–0133 2013)Google Scholar
Council of HM Circuit Judges, Convicting Rapists and Protecting Victims: A Consultation (2006)Google Scholar
Court Service Agency, Framework Document (1995)Google Scholar
Cribb, J. and others, Living Standards, Poverty and Inequality in the UK: 2013 (Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2013)Google Scholar
Department of Constitutional Affairs, Constitutional Reform: A New Way of Appointing Judges (CP 10/03 2003)Google Scholar
Department of Constitutional Affairs, Constitutional Reform: A Supreme Court for the United Kingdom (CP 11/03 2003)Google Scholar
Department of Constitutional Affairs, Constitutional Reform: The Lord Chancellor’s Judiciary Related Functions: Proposals (‘the Concordat’) (2004)Google Scholar
Department of Constitutional Affairs, The Judicial Appointments Commission: Framework Document (2006)Google Scholar
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice, Evaluation Report on European Judicial Systems (2012)Google Scholar
Gay, O. /House of Commons Parliament and Constitution Centre, Role of the Lord Chancellor (SN/PC/2105 2003)Google Scholar
Genn, H., The Attractiveness of Senior Judicial Appointment to Highly Qualified Practitioners: A Report to the Judicial Executive Board (2008)Google Scholar
HC Constitutional Affairs Committee, Asylum and Immigration Tribunal: The Appeals Process (HC 1006-I 2006)Google Scholar
HC Constitutional Affairs Committee, The Creation of the Ministry of Justice (HC 466 2007)Google Scholar
HC Constitutional Affairs Committee, Judicial Appointments and a Supreme Court (Court of Final Appeal) (HC 48-I 2004)Google Scholar
HC Constitutional Affairs Committee, Judicial Appointments and a Supreme Court (Court of Final Appeal): Evidence of Sir Colin Campbell (HC 1275-i 2003)Google Scholar
HC Constitutional Affairs Committee, Judicial Appointments and a Supreme Court (Court of Final Appeal)Minutes of Evidence (HC 48-II 2004)Google Scholar
HC Constitutional Affairs Committee, Judicial Appointments CommissionMinutes of Evidence (HC 416-I 2007)Google Scholar
HC Constitutional Affairs Committee, Judicial Appointments CommissionMinutes of Evidence (HC 416-II 2007)Google Scholar
HC Culture, Media and Sport Committee, Press Standards, Privacy and Libel (HC 362-I 2010)Google Scholar
HC Home Affairs Committee, The USUK Extradition Treaty (HC 644 2012)Google Scholar
HC Justice Committee, Appointment of the Chair of the Judicial Appointments Commission (HC 770 2011)Google Scholar
HC Justice Committee, The Budget and Structure of the Ministry of Justice (HC 97-II 2012)Google Scholar
HC Justice Committee, Operation of the Family Courts (HC 518-I 2011)Google Scholar
HC Justice Committee, Operation of the Family CourtsOral and Written Evidence (HC 518-II 2011)Google Scholar
HC Justice Committee, Towards Effective Sentencing (HC 184-I 2008)Google Scholar
HC Justice Committee, Towards Effective Sentencing: Oral and Written Evidence (HC 184-II 2008)Google Scholar
HC Justice Committee, The Work of the Judicial Appointments CommissionOral Evidence Taken on 7 September 2010 (HC 449-I 2010)Google Scholar
HC Justice Committee, The Work of the Legal Services CommissionUncorrected Evidence30 November 2010 (HC 649-I 2012)Google Scholar
HC Justice Committee, The Work of the Lord Chief JusticeOral Evidence26 October 2010 (HC 521-I 2012)Google Scholar
HC Liaison Committee, Select Committees and Public Appointments (HC 830 2012)Google Scholar
HC Procedure Committee, The Sub Judice Rule of the House of Commons (HC 125 2005)Google Scholar
HC Public Administration Committee, Government by InquiryMinutes of Evidence (HC 51-II 2005)Google Scholar
HL Committee on the Constitutional Reform Bill, Constitutional Reform Bill [HL] (HL 125-I 2004)Google Scholar
HL Committee on the Constitutional Reform Bill, Constitutional Reform Bill [HL]Volume II: Evidence (HL 125-II 2004)Google Scholar
HL Constitution Committee, Coroners and Justice Bill (HL 96 2009)Google Scholar
HL Constitution Committee, Counter-terrorism Bill: The Role of Ministers, Parliament and the Judiciary (HL 167 2008)Google Scholar
HL Constitution Committee, Crime and Courts Bill [HL] (HL 17 2012)Google Scholar
HL Constitution Committee, Judicial Appointments (HL 272 2012)Google Scholar
HL Constitution Committee, Justice (Northern Ireland) Bill (HL 40 2004)Google Scholar
HL Constitution Committee, Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill (HL 54 2007)Google Scholar
HL Constitution Committee, Meetings with the Lord Chief Justice and the Lord Chancellor (HL 89 2011)Google Scholar
HL Constitution Committee, ‘Memorandum by Lord Irvine of Lairg’, The Cabinet Office and the Centre of Government (HL 30 2009)Google Scholar
HL Constitution Committee, Northern Ireland Bill (HL 50 2009)Google Scholar
HL Constitution Committee, Parliamentary Standards Bill: Implications for Parliament and the Courts (HL 134 2009)Google Scholar
HL Constitution Committee, Relations between the Executive, the Judiciary and Parliament (HL 151 2007)Google Scholar
HL Constitution Committee, Relations between the Executive, the Judiciary and Parliament: Follow-up Report (HL 177 2008)Google Scholar
HL Constitution Committee, Welfare Reform Bill (HL 79 2009)Google Scholar
HM Courts and Tribunals Service, Annual Report and Accounts 201112 (HC 323 2012)Google Scholar
HM Courts and Tribunals Service, Annual Report and Accounts 201213 (HC 239 2013)Google Scholar
HM Treasury, Spending Review 2010 (London: TSO, 2010)Google Scholar
HM Treasury, Spending Round 2013 (London: TSO, 2013)Google Scholar
HM Treasury, Managing Public Money (2013)Google Scholar
House of Commons, Matters Sub Judice: Resolution of 15 November 2001Google Scholar
House of Lords, The Grey Book: Who Does What in the House of Lords (2014)Google Scholar
International Bar Association, Minimum Standards of Judicial Independence (1982)Google Scholar
Joint Colloquium on Parliamentary Supremacy and Judicial Independence – towards a Commonwealth Model, Parliamentary Supremacy, Judicial Independence: Latimer House Guidelines for the Commonwealth (Oxford: Latimer House, 1998)Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Human Rights, Enhancing Parliament’s Role in Relation to Human Rights Judgments (HL 85/HC 455 2010)Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Human Rights, Human Rights Judgments: Minutes of Evidence (Uncorrected Transcript of Oral Evidence) (HC 873-II 2011)Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Human Rights, Legislative Scrutiny: Crime and Courts Bill (HL 67/HC 771 2012)Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Parliamentary Privilege, Parliamentary Privilege (HL 30/HC 100 2013)Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions, Privacy and Injunctions (HL 273/HC 1443 2012)Google Scholar
Joint Committee on the Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill, Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill (HL 166-I/HC 551-I 2008)Google Scholar
Judges’ Council, Annual Report 2007Google Scholar
Judges’ Council, First Progress Report of the Standing Committee of the Judges’ CouncilJudicial Support and Welfare (2007)Google Scholar
Judges’ Council, Guide to Judicial Conduct (2008)Google Scholar
Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman, Business Plan 20112012Google Scholar
Judicial Appointments Commission, Annual Report and Accounts: 20067 (HC 632 2007)Google Scholar
Judicial Appointments Commission, Annual Report and Accounts 200910 (HC 219 2010)Google Scholar
Judicial Appointments Commission, Annual Report and Accounts 201112 (HC 351 2012)Google Scholar
Judicial Appointments Commission, Annual Report and Accounts: 201213 (HC 495 2013)Google Scholar
Judicial Appointments Commission, Judicial Selection and Recommendations for Appointment Statistics, England and Wales, April 2010 to September 2010: Judicial Appointments Commission: Statistics Bulletin (2010)Google Scholar
Judicial Appointments Commission, Judicial Selection and Recommendations for Appointment Statistics, April to September 2011: Judicial Appointments Commission Statistics Bulletin (2011)Google Scholar
Judicial Appointments Commission, Judicial Selection and Recommendations for Appointment Statistics, October 2011 to March 2012: Judicial Appointments Commission Statistics Bulletin (2012)Google Scholar
Judicial Appointments Commission, Judicial Selection and Recommendations for Appointment Statistics, October 2012 to March 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
Judicial College, Performance Report AprilJune 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
Judicial Conduct and Investigations Office, Statement from the Judicial Conduct and Investigations Office (OJC 58/13 2013)Google Scholar
Judicial Executive Board, Guidance for Judges Appearing before or Providing Written Evidence to Parliamentary Committees (2008)Google Scholar
Judicial Executive Board, Guidance to Judges on Appearances before Select Committees (2012)Google Scholar
Judicial Independence Project, ‘The Abolition of the Office of Lord Chancellor: 10 Years On: Note of Seminar Held at Queen Mary, University of London’ (12 June 2013)Google Scholar
Judicial Independence Project, ‘Judicial Independence in Northern Ireland: Note of Seminar Held in Belfast’ (6 November 2012)Google Scholar
Judicial Office, Business Plan 20112012Google Scholar
Judicial Office, Business Plan 20132014Google Scholar
Judicial Office, Lord Chief Justice’s Report 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
Judicial Office, Magistrates in Post 2013Google Scholar
Judicial Office, Overview Data of Judicial Appointments by Type2013 (2013)Google Scholar
Judicial Studies Board, Appraisal Standards and Appraiser Competences in Tribunals (2009)Google Scholar
Judiciary of England and Wales, ‘The Accountability of the Judiciary’ (2007)Google Scholar
Leggatt, S. A., Tribunals for Users – One System, One Series: Report of the Review of Tribunals (London: TSO, 2001)Google Scholar
Leith, P. and Morison, J., Rewarding Merit in Judicial Appointments? (Belfast: QUB/Northern Ireland Judicial Appointments Commission, 2013)Google Scholar
Letter from Lord Gill to the Convenor of the Public Petitions Committee (28 May 2013)Google Scholar
Letter from Lord Judge to Keith Vaz MP (6 July 2013)Google Scholar
Lord Chief Justice, Lord Chief Justice’s Review of the Administration of Justice in the Courts (HC 448 2008)Google Scholar
Lord Chief Justice, The Lord Chief Justice’s Review of the Administration of Justice in the Courts (London: TSO, 2010)Google Scholar
Lord Chief Justice’s Office, Complaints about the Conduct of Judicial Office Holders (2013)Google Scholar
Lord President of the Court of Session, Complaints about the Judiciary (Scotland) Rules 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice, Appointments and Diversity: A Judiciary for the 21st Century: Response to Public Consultation (CP19/2011 2012)Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice, Fee Increases in the United Kingdom Supreme Court (CP4/2011 2011)Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice, Framework Document: Ministry of Justice and the Judicial Appointments Commission (2012)Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice, The Governance of Britain: Judicial Appointments (CP 25/07 2007)Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice, HM Courts and Tribunals Service Framework Document (Cm 8043 2011)Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice, HM Courts Service Framework Document (Cm 7350 2008)Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice, Judicial Pension Scheme Memorandum on Single Supplementary Estimate 201213 (2013)Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice, Judicial Salaries 201314 (2013)Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice, A Judiciary for the 21st Century (2011)Google Scholar
National Audit Office, The Performance of the Ministry of Justice 201213 (2013)Google Scholar
NI Assembly Justice Committee, Briefing from the Lord Chief Justice (2013)Google Scholar
NI Assembly Justice Committee, Judicial Appointments and Competition for a High Court Judge: Evidence of HH Judge Desmond Marrinan (2013)Google Scholar
NI Assembly Justice Committee, Judicial Appointments and Competition for a High Court Judge: Evidence of Karamjit Singh (2014)Google Scholar
NI Assembly Justice Committee, Review of Judicial Appointments: Evidence of Sir Declan Morgan (NIA 38/11–15 (Session 2011–15) 2012)Google Scholar
NI Assembly Justice Committee, Review of Judicial Appointments in Northern Ireland: Evidence of the Attorney General for Northern Ireland (NIA 38/11–15 (Session 2011–15) 2012)Google Scholar
Northern Ireland Judicial Appointments Commission, Annual Report and Accounts 20122013 (2013)Google Scholar
Northern Ireland Judicial Appointments Commission, A Guide to Judicial Careers in Northern Ireland (2013)Google Scholar
Office for Budget Responsibility, Fiscal Sustainability ReportJuly 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
Osler, D., Agency Review of the Scottish Court Service (Scottish Executive, 2006)Google Scholar
Paterson, A. and Paterson, C., Guarding the Guardians? Towards an Independent, Accountable and Diverse Senior Judiciary (London: CentreForum, 2012)Google Scholar
Peach, L., Independent Scrutiny of the Appointments Processes of Judges and Queen’s Counsel (1999)Google Scholar
Pensions Policy Institute, The Implications of the Coalition Government’s Reforms for Members of the Public Service Pension Schemes (2012)Google Scholar
Potter, M., Do the Media Influence the Judiciary? (Oxford: Foundation for Law, Justice and Society, 2011)Google Scholar
The Report of the Advisory Panel on Judicial Diversity 2010Google Scholar
Review Body on Senior Salaries, 25th Report on Senior Salaries: Report No. 54 (Cm 5718 2003)Google Scholar
Review Body on Senior Salaries, 33rd Annual Report on Senior Salaries: Report No. 77 (Cm 8026 2011)Google Scholar
Review Body on Senior Salaries, 35th Annual Report on Senior Salaries: Report No. 81 (Cm 8569 2013)Google Scholar
Royal Commission on the Reform of the House of Lords, A House for the Future (Cm 4534 2000)Google Scholar
Russell, M. and Benton, M., Analysis of Existing Data on the Breadth of Expertise and Experience in the House of Lords (London: The Constitution Unit, 2010)Google Scholar
Scottish Government, Civil Judicial Statistics 200910 (2010)Google Scholar
Scottish Government, Civil Judicial Statistics 201011 (2011)Google Scholar
Scottish Parliament Justice Committee, Stage 1 Report on the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Bill: Evidence of Lord Hamilton (SP Paper 91 (Session 3) 2008)Google Scholar
Senior Presiding Judge, HMCTS Reform: Judicial Overview (2013)Google Scholar
Senior Presiding Judge, Response: Proposals on the Provision of Court Services in England and Wales (2010)Google Scholar
Simson-Caird, J., Hazell, R. and Oliver, D., The Constitutional Standards of the House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution (London: The Constitution Unit, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submission by the Judiciary in the Court of Session to the Commission on Scottish Devolution (10 October 2008)Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Review of Judicial Training and Education in Other Jurisdictions: Report Prepared for the Judicial Studies Board (2006)Google Scholar
Tokyo Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary in the LAWASIA Region (1982)Google Scholar
UK Supreme Court, Annual Report and Accounts 2012–13 (London, HC 3 2013)Google Scholar
UK Supreme Court, Judicial Complaints ProcedureGoogle Scholar
UK Supreme Court, Minutes of the Management Board: April 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
UK Supreme Court, Minutes of the Management Board: May 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
UK Supreme Court, Note of the UKSC/JCPC User Group Meeting (UKSC, 2013)Google Scholar
UK Supreme Court, Scottish Criminal Cases and the UK Supreme Court (2012)Google Scholar
UK Supreme Court, Management Board: Minutes of the Meeting Held on 23 March 2010Google Scholar
UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary (UN Doc A/CONF.121/22/Rev.1 1985)Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, UN Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary (1985)Google Scholar
UN Office on Drugs and Crime: Judicial Integrity Group, Bangalore Principles of Judicial Independence (The Hague, 2002)Google Scholar
Waller, P. and Chalmers, M., Evaluation of Pre-appointment Scrutiny Hearings (London: The Constitution Unit, 2010)Google Scholar
Welsh Government, Evidence Submitted by the Welsh Government to the Commission on Devolution in Wales (2003)Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Allan, J., ‘Judicial Appointments in New Zealand: If It Were Done When ’Tis Done, Then ’Twere Well It Were Done Openly and Directly’, in Malleson, K. and Russell, P. (eds.), Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power: Critical Perspectives from around the World (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Andrews, N., ‘Judicial Independence: The British Experience’, in Shetreet, S. and Forsyth, C. (eds.), The Culture of Judicial Independence: Conceptual Foundations and Practical Challenges (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012)Google Scholar
Baker, R., ‘The New Courts Administration: A Case for a Systems Theory Approach’ (1974) 52 Public Administration285Google Scholar
Bell, J., ‘Judicial Cultures and Judicial Independence’ (2001) 4 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J., Judiciaries within Europe: A Comparative Review (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Bellamy, R., Political Constitutionalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beloff, M. J., ‘Paying Judges: Why, Who, Whom, How Much? Neill Lecture 2006’ [2006] Denning Law Journal1Google Scholar
Berlinksi, S., Dewan, T. and Dowding, K., Accounting for Ministers: Scandal and Survival in British Government 1945–2007 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Bevir, M., ‘The Westminster Model, Governance and Judicial Reform’ (2008) 61 Parliamentary Affairs559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, T., The Business of Judging: Selected Essays and Speeches, 1985–1999 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Bingham, T., ‘The Evolving Constitution’ [2002] European Human Rights Law Review1Google Scholar
Bingham, T., Lives of the Law: Selected Essays and Speeches: 2000–2010 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Blair, T., The Journey (London: Hutchinson, 2010)Google Scholar
Blom-Cooper, L., ‘Who Is the Most Senior Judge?’ [2008] Public Law413Google Scholar
Blom-Cooper, L., Dickson, B. and Drewry, G. (eds.), The Judicial House of Lords, 1876–2009 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom-Cooper, L. and Drewry, G., Final Appeal (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972)Google Scholar
Bonneau, C. and Gann Hall, M., In Defense of Judicial Elections (Abingdon: Routledge, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, M., ‘Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework’ (2007) 13 European Law Journal447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, M., ‘Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism’ (2010) 33 West European Politics946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, A., ‘Judges and the Media: The Kilmuir Rules’ [1986] Public Law383Google Scholar
Brazier, R., Ministers of the Crown (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, D., ‘The Use of Judicial Performance Evaluation to Enhance Judicial Accountability, Judicial Independence, and Public Trust’ (2008) 86 Denver University Law Review115Google Scholar
Browne-Wilkinson, N., ‘The Independence of the Judiciary in the 1980s’ [1988] Public Law44Google Scholar
Burbank, S., ‘The Architecture of Judicial Independence’ (1999) 72 Southern California Law Review315Google Scholar
Burbank, S., ‘What Do We Mean by “Judicial Independence”?’ 64 Ohio State Law Journal323Google Scholar
Burbank, S. and Friedman, B. (eds.), Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbank, S. and Friedman, B.Reconsidering Judicial Independence’, in Burbank, S. and Friedman, B. (eds.), Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2002)Google Scholar
Burrows, A., ‘Numbers Sitting in the Supreme Court’ (2013) 129 Law Quarterly Review305Google Scholar
Buxton, R., ‘Sitting En Banc in the New Supreme Court’ (2009) 125 Law Quarterly Review288Google Scholar
Cameron, C., ‘Judicial Independence: How Can You Tell It When You See It? And Who Cares?’, in Burbank, S. and Friedman, B. (eds.), Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2002)Google Scholar
Cooke, R., ‘The Law Lords: An Endangered Heritage’ (2003) 119 Law Quarterly Review49Google Scholar
Cornes, R., ‘A Constitutional Disaster in the Making? The Communications Challenge Facing the United Kingdom’s Supreme Court’ [2013] Public Law266Google Scholar
Cornes, R., ‘Gains (and Dangers of Losses) in Translation: The Leadership Function in the United Kingdom’s Supreme Court, Parameters and Prospects’ [2011] Public Law509Google Scholar
Cranston, R., ‘Lawyers, MPs and Judges’, in Feldman, D. (ed.), Law in Politics, Politics in Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013)Google Scholar
Dalton, R., Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darbyshire, P., Sitting in Judgment: The Working Lives of Judges (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar
Darbyshire, P., ‘Where Do English and Welsh Judges Come from?’ (2007) 66 Cambridge Law Journal365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denning, Lord, The Road to Justice (London: Stevens & Sons, 1955)Google Scholar
Dickson, B., ‘A Hard Act to Follow: The Bingham Court, 2000–2008’, in Blom-Cooper, L., Dickson, B. and Drewry, G. (eds.), The Judicial House of Lords, 1876–2009 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Dickson, B., Human Rights and the UK Supreme Court (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Dickson, B., ‘The Processing of Appeals in the House of Lords’ (2007) 123 Law Quarterly Review571Google Scholar
Dodek, A. and Sossin, L., ‘Introduction’, in Dodek, A. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Judicial Independence in Context (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2010)Google Scholar
Dodek, A. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Judicial Independence in Context (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2010)Google Scholar
Donaldson, J. and Scott, I., ‘Court Administration in England and Wales’, in Moloney, G. (ed.), Seminar on Constitutional and Administrative Responsibilities for the Administration of Justice: The Partnership of Judiciary and Executive (Canberra: Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, 1985)Google Scholar
Drewry, G., ‘The Executive: Towards Accountable Government and Effective Governance?’, in Jowell, J. and Oliver, D. (eds.), The Changing Constitution, 6th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Drewry, G., ‘Judicial Appointments’ [1998] Public Law1Google Scholar
Drewry, G., ‘Ministers, Parliament and the Courts’ (1992) 142 New Law Journal50Google Scholar
Drewry, G., ‘Parliamentary Accountability for the Administration of Justice’, in Horne, A., Drewry, G. and Oliver, D. (eds.), Parliament and the Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013)Google Scholar
Drewry, G., ‘The UK Supreme Court: A Fine New Vintage or Just a Smart New Label on a Dusty Old Bottle?’ (2011) 3 International Journal for Court Administration20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drewry, G. and Oliver, D., ‘Parliamentary Accountability for the Administration of Justice’, in Oliver, D. and Drewry, G. (eds.), The Law and Parliament (London: Butterworths, 1998)Google Scholar
Dunn, R., Sword and Wig: Memoirs of a Lord Justice (London: Quiller Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Elliot, M., ‘Ombudsmen, Tribunals, Inquiries: Re-fashioning Accountability beyond the Courts’, in Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Feldman, D., ‘“Which in Your Case You Have Not Got”: Constitutionalism, at Home and Abroad’ (2011) 64 Current Legal Problems117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, J. and Kramer, L., ‘Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Institutionalising Judicial Restraint’ (2002) 77 NYU Law Review962Google Scholar
Finn, J., ‘The Rule of Law and Judicial Independence in Newly Democratic Regimes’ (2004) 13 The Good Society12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garapon, A., ‘A New Approach for Promoting Judicial Independence’, in Peerenboom, R. (ed.), Judicial Independence in China: Lessons for Global Rule of Law Promotion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S., ‘Reassessing the New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism’ (2010) 8 International Journal of Constitutional Law167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J., ‘The Mark of Responsibility’, in Dowdle, M. (ed.), Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Gee, G., ‘Defending Judicial Independence in the British Constitution’, in Dodek, A. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Judicial Independence in Context (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2010)Google Scholar
Gee, G., ‘Guarding the Guardians: The Chief Executive of the UK Supreme Court’ [2013] Public Law538Google Scholar
Gee, G., ‘The Persistent Politics of Judicial Selection: A Comparative Analysis’, in Seibert-Fohr, A. (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (New York and Heidelberg: Springer, 2012)Google Scholar
Gee, G., ‘The Politics of Judicial Appointments in Canada’, in Judicial Appointments: Balancing Independence, Accountability and Legitimacy (London: Judicial Appointments Commission, 2010)Google Scholar
Geyh, C., ‘Rescuing Judicial Accountability from the Realm of Political Rhetoric’ (2006) 56 Case Western Law Review911Google Scholar
Gies, L., Law and the Media: The Future of an Uneasy Relationship (London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, G., ‘The Rationale and Some Aspects of Judicial Independence’ (1985) 59 Australian Law Journal135Google Scholar
Griffith, J., ‘Here Come the Judges’ [2000] Times Literary Supplement14Google Scholar
Griffith, J., The Politics of the Judiciary, 5th edn (London: Fontana, 1997)Google Scholar
Guarnieri, C., Pederzoli, P. and Thomas, C. A., The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hailsham, Lord, ‘The Office of Lord Chancellor and the Separation of Powers’ [1989] Civil Justice Quarterly308Google Scholar
Hain, P., Outside In (London: Biteback Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar
Hale, B., ‘A Supreme Judicial Leader’, in Andenas, M. and Fairgrieve, D. (eds.), Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the Law: A Liber Amicorum (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Hall, J. and Martin, D., Yes, Lord Chancellor: A Biography of Lord Schuster (Chichester: Barry Rose Law, 2003)Google Scholar
Harlow, C. (ed.), Public Law and Politics (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1986)Google Scholar
Harlow, C.Refurbishing the Judicial Service’, in Harlow, C. (ed.), Public Law and Politics (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1986)Google Scholar
Harlow, C. and Rawlings, R., ‘Promoting Accountability in Multi-level Governance: A Network Approach’ (2007) 13 European Law Journal542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J., ‘Judging the Judges: The New Scheme of Judicial Conduct and Discipline in Scotland’ [2009] Edinburgh Law Review427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayo, B. and Voigt, S., ‘Explaining De Facto Judicial Independence’ (2007) 28 International Review of Law and Economics269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazell, R., ‘Who Is the Guardian of Legal Values in the Legislative Process: Parliament or the Executive?’ [2004] Public Law495Google Scholar
Helmke, G. and Rosenbluth, F., ‘Regimes and the Rule of Law: Judicial Independence in Comparative Perspective’ (2009) 12 Annual Review of Political Science345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuston, R., Lives of the Lord Chancellors: 1940–1970 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Hogg, P., ‘The Bad Idea of Unwritten Constitutional Principles: Protecting Judicial Salaries’, in Dodek, A. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Judicial Independence in Context (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2010)Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W., ‘The Constitutional Position of the Judges’ (1932) 48 Law Quarterly Review29Google Scholar
Holmes, S., ‘Judicial Independence as Ambiguous Reality and Insidious Illusion’, in Dworkin, R. (ed.), From Liberal Values to Democratic Transition: Essays in Honor of Janos Kis (Budapest and New York: Central European University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Hope, Lord, ‘A Phoenix from the Ashes? Accommodating a New Supreme Court’ (2005) 121 Law Quarterly Review253Google Scholar
Hope, Lord, ‘Scots Law Seen from South of the Border’ (2012) 16 Edinburgh Law Review58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, Lord, ‘Voices from the Past: The Law Lords’ Contribution to the Legislative Process’ (2007) 123 Law Quarterly Review547Google Scholar
Howarth, D., ‘Lawyers in the House of Commons’, in Feldman, D. (ed.), Law in Politics, Politics in Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013)Google Scholar
Hunt, M., ‘The Joint Committee on Human Rights’, in Horne, A., Drewry, G. and Oliver, D. (eds.), Parliament and the Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013)Google Scholar
Hutchinson, A., ‘Judges and Politics: An Essay from Canada’ (2004) 24 Legal Studies275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, M. and others (eds.), Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice, 24th edn (London: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2011)Google Scholar
Jackson, V., ‘Judicial Independence: Structure, Context, Attitude’, in Seibert-Fohr, A. (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (New York and Heidelberg: Springer, 2012)Google Scholar
Jennings Peretti, T., ‘Does Judicial Independence Exist? The Lessons of Social Science Research’, in Burbank, S. and Friedman, B. (eds.), Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2002)Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A., ‘From Appellate Committee to Supreme Court: Independence, Activism and Transparency’, in Lee, J. (ed.), From House of Lords to Supreme Court: Judges, Jurists and the Process of Judging (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A., ‘A New Supreme Court for the United Kingdom: Some Reflections on Judicial Independence, Activism and Transparency’, Paper No. 58/2010, University of Oxford Legal Research SeriesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, R., ‘Select Committees: Powers and Functions’, in Horne, A., Drewry, G. and Oliver, D. (eds.), Parliament and the Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013)Google Scholar
Knight, C., ‘The Supreme Court Gives Its Reasons’ (2012) 128 Law Quarterly Review477Google Scholar
Knight, J. and Epstein, L., ‘The Norm of Stare Decisis’ (1996) 40 American Journal of Political Science1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosar, D., ‘The Least Accountable Branch’ (2013) 11 International Journal of Constitutional Law234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotzian, P., ‘Public Support for Liberal Democracy’ (2011) 32 International Political Science Review23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwak, J., ‘Cultural Capture and the Financial Crisis’, in Carpenter, D. and Moss, D. (eds.), Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit it (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Larkins, C., ‘Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis’ (1996) 44 American Journal of Comparative Law605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S., Judging Judges (London: Faber, 1988)Google Scholar
Legg, T., ‘Judges for the New Century’ [2001] Public Law62Google Scholar
Le Sueur, A., ‘Developing Mechanisms for Judicial Accountability in the UK’ (2004) 24 Legal Studies73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Sueur, A., ‘Parliamentary Accountability and the Judicial System’, in Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Livingstone, S., ‘The House of Lords and the Northern Ireland Conflict’ (1994) 57 Modern Law Review333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, S., Power: A Radical View (London: Macmillan, 1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, Lord, ‘The Lord Chancellor’s Role within Government’ (1995) 145 New Law Journal1650Google Scholar
Malleson, K., ‘Creating a Judicial Appointments Commission: Which Model Works Best?’ [2004] Public Law102Google Scholar
Malleson, K., ‘The Evolving Role of the UK Supreme Court’ [2011] Public Law754Google Scholar
Malleson, K., ‘The Judicial Appointments Commission in England and Wales: New Wine in New Bottles?’, in Malleson, K. and Russell, P. (eds.), Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power: Critical Perspectives from around the World (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Malleson, K., ‘Judicial Training and Performance Appraisal: The Problem of Judicial Independence’ (1997) 60 Modern Law Review655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malleson, K., ‘The New Judicial Appointments Commission in England and Wales’, in Malleson, K. and Russell, P. (eds.), Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power: Critical Perspectives from around the World (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malleson, K., The New Judiciary: The Effects of Expansion and Activism (London: Ashgate, 1999)Google Scholar
Malleson, K., ‘Promoting Diversity in the Judiciary: Reforming the Judicial Appointments Process’ in Thomas, P. (ed.), Discriminating Lawyers (London: Cavendish, 2000)Google Scholar
Malleson, K., ‘Prospects for Parity: The Position of Women in the Judiciary in England and Wales’, in Shultz, U. and Shaw, G. (eds.), Women in the World’s Legal Professions (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar
Malleson, K. and Russell, P. (eds.), Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power: Critical Perspectives from around the World (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, D., ‘Towards a Framework for Establishing Policy Success’ (2010) 88 Public Administration564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashaw, J., ‘Accountability and Institutional Design: Some Thoughts on the Grammar of Governance’, in Dowdle, M. (ed.), Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Masterman, R., ‘Labour’s “Juridification of the Constitution”’ (2009) 62 Parliamentary Affairs476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masterman, R., The Separation of Powers in the Contemporary Constitution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Masterman, R. and Murkens, J., ‘Skirting Supremacy and Subordination: The Constitutional Authority of the UK Supreme Court’ [2013] Public Law800Google Scholar
Millar, P. S. and Baar, C., Judicial Administration in Canada (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Moran, L., ‘Mass-Mediated “Open Justice”: Court and Judicial Reports in the Press in England and Wales’ (2014) 34 Legal Studies143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, L., ‘Judicial Administration in Transitional Eastern Countries’, in Seibert-Fohr, A. (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition (New York and Heidelberg: Springer, 2012)Google Scholar
Nergelius, J., Constitutional Law in Sweden (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2011)Google Scholar
Normanton, E., The Accountability and Audit of Governments: A Comparative Study (Manchester: University of Manchester Press, 1966)Google Scholar
O’Brien, P., ‘Change to Judicial Appointments in the Crime and Courts Act 2013’ [2014] Public Law179Google Scholar
Oliver, D., Constitutional Reform in the United Kingdom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Oliver, D., ‘Constitutionalism and the Abolition of the Office of Lord Chancellor’ (2004) 57 Parliamentary Affairs754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, D., ‘The Lord Chancellor’s Department and the Judges’ [1994] Public Law157Google Scholar
Olowofoyeku, A., Suing Judges: A Study of Judicial Immunity (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partington, M., ‘Training the Judiciary in England and Wales: The Work of the Judicial Studies Board’ [1994] Civil Justice Quarterly319Google Scholar
Paterson, A., Final Judgment (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013)Google Scholar
Paterson, A., The Law Lords (London: Macmillan, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, A., Lawyers and the Public Good: Democracy in Action? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Paterson, A., ‘The Scottish Judicial Appointments Board: New Wine in Old Bottles’, in Malleson, K. and Russell, P. (eds.), Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power: Critical Perspectives from around the World (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Paterson, A., ‘Scottish Lords of Appeal 1876–1988’ [1988] Juridical Review235Google Scholar
Paterson, A., ‘The Supreme Court Today’ [2012] Counsel34Google Scholar
Peerenboom, R. (ed.), Judicial Independence in China: Lessons for Global Rule of Law Promotion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Polden, P., Guide to the Records of the Lord Chancellor’s Department (London: HMSO, 1988)Google Scholar
Powell, J., The New Machiavelli: How to Wield Power in the Modern World (London: Vintage, 2010)Google Scholar
Prashar, Baroness, ‘Translating Aspirations into Reality: Establishing the Judicial Appointments Commission’, in Judicial Appointments: Balancing Independence, Accountability and Legitimacy (London: Judicial Appointments Commission, 2010)Google Scholar
Prince, S., ‘Law and Politics: Rumours of the Demise of the Lord Chancellor Have Been Exaggerated …’ (2005) 58 Parliamentary Affairs248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, S., ‘The Law and Politics: Upsetting the Judicial Apple-Cart’ (2004) 57 Parliamentary Affairs228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purchas, F., ‘The Constitution in the Market Place’ (1993) 143 New Law Journal1604Google Scholar
Purchas, F., ‘Lord Mackay and the Judiciary’ (1994) 144 New Law Journal527Google Scholar
Purchas, F., ‘What Is Happening to Judicial Independence?’ (1994) 144 New Law Journal1306Google Scholar
Resnik, J., ‘Judicial Selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure’ (2005) 26 no. 2Cardozo Law Review579Google Scholar
Rhodes, R., Control and Power in Central–Local Government Relations (Aldershot: Gower, 1981)Google Scholar
Rhodes, R., Everyday Life in British Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Robertson, D., Judicial Discretion in the House of Lords (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozenberg, J., Trial of Strength (London: Richard Cohen, 1997)Google Scholar
Rush, M. and Baldwin, N., ‘Lawyers in Parliament’, in Oliver, D. and Drewry, G. (eds.), The Law and Parliament (London: Butterworths, 1998)Google Scholar
Russell, P., ‘Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy’, in Russell, P. and O’Brien, D. (eds.), Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2001)Google Scholar
Russell, P., ‘Towards a General Theory of Judicial Independence’, in Russell, P. and O’Brien, D. (eds.), Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2001)Google Scholar
Russell, P. and O’Brien, D. (eds.), Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2001)Google Scholar
Sackville, R., ‘The Judicial Appointments Process in Australia: Towards Independence and Accountability’ (2007) 16 Journal of Judicial Administration125Google Scholar
Sallmann, P., ‘Courts Governance: A Thorn in the Crown of Judicial Independence?’ (2007) 16 Journal of Judicial Administration139Google Scholar
Sallmann, P. and Smith, T., ‘Constitutionalism and Managerial Effectiveness: Revisiting Australian Courts’ Governance’, in Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration (ed.), Australian Courts: Serving Democracy and Its Publics (Melbourne, 2013)Google Scholar
Schuster, Lord, ‘The Office of the Lord Chancellor’ (1948) 10 Cambridge Law Journal175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, C., ‘Accountability in the Regulatory State’ (2000) 27 Journal of Law and Society38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, I., ‘Judicial Involvement in Court Administration’ [1988] Civil Justice Quarterly153Google Scholar
Scott, I., ‘The Council of Judges in the Supreme Court of England and Wales’ [1989] Public Law379Google Scholar
Sedley, S., ‘Beware Kite-Flyers’ (2013) 35 London Review of Books13Google Scholar
Segal, J. and Spaeth, H., The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Segal, J. and Spaeth, H., The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, M., Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, M., ‘Political Jurisprudence’ (1963) 52 Kentucky Law Journal294Google Scholar
Shetreet, S., ‘Judicial Independence: New Conceptual Dimensions and Contemporary Challenges’, in Shetreet, S. and Deschênes, J. (eds.), Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1985)Google Scholar
Shetreet, S., ‘The Normative Cycle of Shaping Judicial Independence in Domestic and International Law’ (2009) 10 Chicago Journal of International Law275Google Scholar
Shetreet, S. and Deschênes, J. (eds.), Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1985)Google Scholar
Shetreet, S. and Forsyth, C. (eds.), The Culture of Judicial Independence: Conceptual Foundations and Practical Challenges (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shetreet, S. and Turenne, S., Judges on Trial: The Independence and Accountability of the English Judiciary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simson-Caird, J., ‘Parliamentary Constitutional Review: Ten Years of the House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution’ [2012] Public Law4Google Scholar
Simson-Caird, J., Hazell, R. and Oliver, D., The Constitutional Standards of the House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution (London: The Constitution Unit, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiller, P. and Tomasi, M., ‘Judicial Decision-Making in Unstable Environments: Argentina 1935–1998’ (2002) 46 American Journal of Political Science699Google Scholar
Steele, D., ‘The Judicial House of Lords: Abolition and Restoration 1873–6’, in Blom-Cooper, L., Dickson, B. and Drewry, G. (eds.), The Judicial House of Lords, 1876–2009 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Stevens, R., The English Judges: Their Role in the Changing Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar
Stevens, R., The Independence of the Judiciary: The View from the Lord Chancellor’s Office (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Stevens, R., ‘Judicial Independence in England: A Loss of Innocence’, in Russell, P. and O’Brien, D. (eds.), Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from around the World (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2001)Google Scholar
Stevens, R., ‘Judicial Salaries: Financial Independence in the Age of Equality’ (1992) 13 Legal History155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R., ‘A Loss of Innocence and the Separation of Powers’ (1999) 19 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steyn, Lord, ‘The Case for a Supreme Court’ (2002) 118 Law Quarterly Review382Google Scholar
Straw, J., Aspects of Law Reform: An Insider’s Perspective (The Hamlyn Lectures) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straw, J., Last Man Standing: Memoirs of a Political Survivor (London: Macmillan, 2012)Google Scholar
Stupak, R., ‘Court Leadership in Transition: Fast Forward toward the Year 2000’ (1991) 15 Justice System Journal617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunkin, M., ‘Judicialization of Politics in the United Kingdom’ (1994) 15 International Political Science Review125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Lord Justice, ‘The Judges’ Council’ [2005] Public Law608Google Scholar
Tushnet, M., ‘Judicial Accountability in Comparative Perspective’, in Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Underhill, N., The Lord Chancellor (Lavenham: Terence Dalton, 1978)Google Scholar
Vallance White, J., ‘The Judicial Office’, in Blom-Cooper, L., Dickson, B. and Drewry, G. (eds.), The Judicial House of Lords, 1876–2009 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Vyas, Y., ‘The Independence of the Judiciary: A Third World Perspective’ (1992) 11 Third World Legal Studies127Google Scholar
Watson, R. and Wolfe, M., ‘Comparing Judicial Compensation: Apples, Oranges and Cherry Picking’ [2008] SSRN Duke Law Working Paper SeriesGoogle Scholar
Widner, J., Building the Rule of Law: Francis Nyalali and the Road to Judicial Independence in Africa (London: W. W. Norton, 2001)Google Scholar
Windlesham, Lord, ‘The Constitutional Reform Act: The Politics of Constitutional Reform – Part 2’ [2006] Public Law35Google Scholar
Woodhouse, D., ‘The Constitutional Reform Act 2005: Defending Judicial Independence the English Way’ (2007) 5 International Journal of Constitutional Law153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhouse, D., ‘Judicial Independence and Accountability within the United Kingdom’s New Constitutional Settlement’, in Canivet, G., Andenas, M. and Fairgrieve, D. (eds.), Independence, Accountability and the Judiciary (London: BIICL, 2006)Google Scholar
Woodhouse, D., The Office of Lord Chancellor (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001)Google Scholar
Woodhouse, D., ‘The Office of Lord Chancellor: Time to Abandon the Judicial Role – the Rest Will Follow’ (2002) 22 Legal Studies128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhouse, D., ‘The Reconstruction of Constitutional Accountability’ [2002] Public Law73Google Scholar
Woolf, Lord, ‘The Needs of a 21st Century Judge: Judicial Studies Board Annual Lecture 2001’, in The Pursuit of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, Lord, ‘Judicial Independence Not Judicial Isolation’, in The Pursuit of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, Lord, The Pursuit of Justice (ed. Campbell-Holt, C.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, A., ‘Civil Litigation: A Public Service for the Enforcement of Civil Rights’ (2007) 26 Civil Justice Quarterly1Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Graham Gee, University of Birmingham, Robert Hazell, University College London, Kate Malleson, Queen Mary University of London, Patrick O'Brien, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: The Politics of Judicial Independence in the UK's Changing Constitution
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589223.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Graham Gee, University of Birmingham, Robert Hazell, University College London, Kate Malleson, Queen Mary University of London, Patrick O'Brien, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: The Politics of Judicial Independence in the UK's Changing Constitution
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589223.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Graham Gee, University of Birmingham, Robert Hazell, University College London, Kate Malleson, Queen Mary University of London, Patrick O'Brien, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: The Politics of Judicial Independence in the UK's Changing Constitution
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589223.012
Available formats
×