Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T18:34:02.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 22 - Cross-borderreproductive services and fertility counseling

from Section 6 - Practice issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

By
Petra Thorn  and
Eric Blyth
Edited by
Sharon N. Covington
Sharon N. Covington
Affiliation:
Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, Maryland
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Fertility Counseling
Clinical Guide and Case Studies
 , pp. 308 - 320
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Thorn, P. Reproduktives Reisen – eine Expertise für den Pro Familia Bundesverband. Pro Familia Bundesverband. 2008 http://www.profamilia.de/fileadmin/publikationen/Fachpublikationen/expertise_reproduktives_reisen.pdf. (Accessed 14 April, 2014.)Google Scholar
Inhorn, MC, Patrizio, P. Rethinking reproductive “tourism” as reproductive “exile.” Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 904–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blyth, E. Fertility patients’ experiences of cross-border reproductive care. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: e11–15.Google Scholar
Shenfield, F, de Mouzon, J, Pennings, G, et al. Cross border reproductive care in six European countries. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 1361–68.Google Scholar
Bergmann, S. Reproductive borders, agency, and imagination: the experience of Germans seeking egg donation abroad. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 23: 600–8.Google Scholar
Hughes, E, DeJean, D. Cross-border fertility services in North America: a survey of Canadian and American providers. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: e16–e19.Google Scholar
Infertility Network. The Infertility Network UK Fertility Tourism Survey Results. Unpublished survey results. 2008.Google Scholar
Inhorn, MC, Shrivastav, P. Globalization and reproductive tourism in the United Arab Emirates. Asia-Pacific J Pub Health/Asia-Pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health 2010; 22(3 Suppl):68S–74S.Google Scholar
Kilani, Z, Shaban, M, Haj, Hassan L. Gender selection. In: Hédon, B, Mettler, L, Tinnneberg, HR. eds. Proceedings of the IFFS 2th World Congress on Fertility and Sterility. München, Lukn Verlagsgesellschaft. 2010; 110–14.Google Scholar
Smerdon, UR. Crossing bodies, crossing borders: international surrogacy between the United States and India. Cumberland Law Rev 2008; 39: 15–85.Google Scholar
Whittaker, AM. Reproduction opportunists in the new global sex trade: PGD and non-medical sex selection. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 23: 609–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson, N, Culley, L, Blyth, E, et al. Cross-border reproductive care: a review of the literature. Reprod BioMed Online 2011; 22: 673–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2008 assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports 13. 2010. http://www.cdc.gov/art/artreports.htm. (Accessed April 14, 2014.)Google Scholar
Blyth, E, Thorn, P, Wischmannn, T. CBRC and psychosocial counselling: assessing needs and developing an ethical framework for practice. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 23: 642–51.Google Scholar
McKelvey, A, David, A, Shenfield, F, et al. The impact of cross-border reproductive care or “fertility tourism” on NHS maternity services. BJOG 2009; 116: 1520–3.Google Scholar
Inhorn, MC, Patrizio, P. The global landscape of cross-border reproductive care: twenty key findings for the new millennium. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2012; 24: 158–63.Google Scholar
Thorn, P, Wischmann, T. German guidelines for psychosocial counselling in the area of “cross border reproductive services.” Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;287: 599–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennings, G. Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 2689–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shenfield, F, Pennings, G, De Mouzon, J, et al. ESHRE's good practice guide for cross-border reproductive care for centers and practitioners. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 1625–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Cross-border reproductive care: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013; 100: 645–50.Google Scholar
Thorn, P, Wischmann, T, Blyth, E. Cross Border Reproductive Services – suggestions for an ethically based minimum standard of care in Europe. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 2012; 33: 1–6.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. CETS No: 164. 1997. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/164.htm (Accessed April 14, 2014.)Google Scholar
Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. CETS No: 005. 1950. http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/005.htm. (Accessed April 14, 2014.)Google Scholar
International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Ethical Issues in Obstetrics and Gynecology by the FIGO Committee for the Study of Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health. 2012. http://www.glowm.com/pdf/English%20Ethical%20Issues%20in%20Obstetrics%20a (Accessed October, 2014.)Google Scholar
International Alliance of Patients’ Organisations. What is Patient Centred Health Care? A Review of Definitions and Principles. 2007. http://www.patientsorganizations.org/pchreview. (Accessed April 14, 2014.)Google Scholar
Blyth, E, Hunt, J. A history of infertility counselling in the United Kingdom. In: Jennings, S. ed. Infertility Counselling. Oxford, Basil Blackwell. 1994; 175–90.Google Scholar
Blyth, E. 1988–2008: twenty years of BICA [British Infertility Counselling Association. J Fertil Counsel 2008; 15(1): 15–28.Google Scholar
Kleinschmidt, D, Thorn, P, Wischmann, T. Kinderwunsch und professionelle Beratung. Das Handbuch des Beratungsnetzwerkes Kinderwunsch Deutschland (BKiD). Stuttgart, Kohlhammer. 2008.Google Scholar
Blyth, E. Guidelines for infertility counselling in different countries: is there an emerging trend? Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 2046–57.Google Scholar
Pennings, G, de Wert, G, Shenfield, F, et al. ESHRE task force on ethics and law 15: cross-border reproductive care. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 2182–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Federation of Infertility Societies. IFFS Surveillance 2013. http://www.iffs-reproduction.org/?page = SurveillanceHidden. (Accessed April 14, 2014.)Google Scholar
Ferraretti, A.P., Goossens, V., Kupka, M., et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2009: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 2318–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jungheim, E, Ryan, GL, Levens, ED, et al. Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 1432–36.Google Scholar
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril 2006; 86(5 Suppl): S51–52.Google Scholar
The ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. 6. Ethical issues related to multiple pregnancies in medically assisted procreation. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1976–9.Google Scholar
Trimmings, K, Beaumont, P. International Surrogacy Arrangements. Oxford, Hart Publishing. 2013.Google Scholar
Spiewak, M Verbotene Kinder. Die Zeit. 2010, April 22;17. http://www.zeit.de/2010/17/Leihmutterschaft?page = all. 07.05.2010. (Accessed April 14, 2014.)Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = OJ:L:2004:102:0048:0058:en:PDF. (Accessed April 14, 2014.)Google Scholar
Janssens, PM, Nap, AW, Bancsi, LF. Reconsidering the number of offspring per gamete donor in the Dutch open-identity system. Hum Fertil 2011; 14: 106–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfeffer, N. Eggs-ploiting women: a critical feminist analysis of the different principles in transplant and fertility tourism. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 23: 634–41.Google Scholar
Thorn, P, Wischmann, T. German guidelines for psychosocial counselling in the area of gamete donation. Hum Fertil 2009; 12: 73–80.Google Scholar
Triseliotis, J. Identity-formation and the adopted person revisited. In: Treacher, A, Katz, I. eds. The Dynamics of Adoption. Social and Personal Experiences. London, Jessica Kingsley Publishers. 2000; 81–98.Google Scholar
Dickens, B. Cross-border reproductive services: FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health. IJ Gynecol Obstet 2010; 111: 190–1.Google Scholar
Blyth, E, Farrand, A. Reproductive tourism – a price worth paying for reproductive autonomy? Crit Soc Pol 2005; 25: 91–114.Google Scholar
Blyth, E, Auffrey, M. International Policy on Cross Border Reproductive Services. Geneva, International Federation of Social Workers. 2008. http://ifsw.org/policies/cross-border-reproductive-services/ (Accessed April 14, 2014).Google Scholar
Culley, L, Hudson, N, Rapport, F, et al. Crossing borders for fertility treatment: motivations, destinations and outcomes of UK fertility travellers. Hum Reprod 2012; 26: 2373–81.Google Scholar
Culley, L, Hudson, N, Rapport, F, et al, ‘What are you going to do, confiscate their passports?’ Professional perspectives on cross-border reproductive travel. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2013; 31(1): 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palattiyil, G, Blyth, E, Sidhva, D, et al. Globalisation and cross-border reproductive services: ethical implications of surrogacy in India for social work. I Soc Work 2010; 53: 686–700.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×