Aitchison, J. 1991. Language change: Progress or decay? London: Fortuna.Google Scholar

Baayen, R. H., Wurm, L. H. and Aycock, J. 2007. ‘Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities’, Mental Lexicon 2: 419–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blevins, J. P. and Blevins, J. 2009. ‘Introduction: Analogy in grammar’, Blevins, J. P. and Blevins, J. (eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition. Oxford University Press, pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouda, K. 1939. ‘Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Udischen auf Grund neuer Texte’, Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft 93(1): 60–72.Google Scholar

Campbell, A. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, L. 1999. Historical linguistics: An introduction, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cassidy, F. G. and Ringler, R. N. (eds.) 1971. Bright’s Old English grammar and reader. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Charachidzé, G. 1981. Grammaire de la langue Avar (langue du Caucase Nord-Est). Saint-Sulpice de Favières: Jean-Favard.Google Scholar

Čikobava, A. and Cercvaʒe, I. 1962. Xunzuri ena [The Avar language]. Tbilisi: Universit’et’i.Google Scholar

De Smet, H. 2013. Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dirr, A. 1928. ‘Udische Texte’, Caucasica 5: 60–72.Google Scholar

Ellegård, A. 1953. The auxiliary do: The establishment and regulation of its use in English (Gothenburg Studies in English). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar

Fertig, D. 2013. Analogy and morphological change. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forker, D. 2012. ‘The bi-absolutive construction in Nakh-Daghestanian’, Folia Linguistica 46: 75–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gagliardi, A., Goncalves, M., Polinsky, M. and Radkevich, N. 2014. ‘The biabsolutive construction in Lak and Tsez’, Lingua 150: 137–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrett, A. 2008. ‘Paradigmatic uniformity and markedness’, in Good, J. (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change. Oxford University Press, pp. 125–43.Google Scholar

Harris, A. C. 1985. Diachronic syntax: The Kartvelian case (Syntax and Semantics 18). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, A. C. 2000a. ‘Word order harmonies and word order change in Georgian’, in Sornicola, R., Poppe, E. and Sisha-Halevy, A. (eds.), Stability, variation and change of word order patterns over time. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 133–63.Google Scholar

Harris, A. C. 2000b. ‘Where in the word is the Udi clitic?’, Language 76: 593–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, A. C. 2002. Endoclitics and the origins of Udi morphosyntax. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, A. C. 2013. ‘Origins of metathesis in Batsbi’, in Lohndahl, T. (ed.), In search of universal grammar: From Old Norse to Zoque. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 221–37.Google Scholar

Harris, A. C. 2014. ‘On the origins of biabsolutive constructions in Avar, Batsbi, and Nakh-Daghestanian languages’, presentation at the workshop ‘Diachronic Typology of Differential Argument Marking’, University of Konstanz, April.Google Scholar

Harris, A. C. and Campbell, L. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofstadter, D. R. and Sander, E. 2013. Surfaces and essences: Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Jeiranišvili, E. 1971. Udiuri ena [The Udi language]. Tbilisi University.Google Scholar

Joseph, B. D. and Pappas, P. 2002. ‘On some recent views concerning the development of the Greek future system’, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 26: 247–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kadagiʒe, D. and Kadagiʒe, N. 1984. C’ova-tušur-kartul-rusuli leksik’oni [Tsova-Tush-Georgian-Russian dictionary]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. 1973. ‘“Elsewhere” in phonology’, in Anderson, S. R. and Kiparsky, P. (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 93–106.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. [1978] 1982. ‘Analogical change as a problem for linguistic theory’, reprinted in Explanation in phonology, ed. Kiparsky, P.. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 217–36.Google Scholar

Kroch, A. S. 1989. ‘Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change’, Language variation and change 1: 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krug, M. 2000. Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krug, M. 2003. ‘Frequency as a determinant in grammatical variation and change’, in Rojdenburg, G and Mondorf, B. (ed.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 7–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Los, B. 2005. The rise of the to-infinitive. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogura, M. 1993. ‘The development of periphrastic do in English: A case of lexical diffusion in syntax’, Diachronica 10: 51–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogura, M. and Wang, W. S.-Y. 1996. ‘Snowball effect in lexical diffusion: The development of –s in the third person singular present indicative in English’, in Britton, D. (ed.), English historical linguistics 1994: Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics at Edinburgh. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 119–41.Google Scholar

Paul, H. [1880] 1968. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 7th edn. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Sadock, J. M. 1973. ‘Word-final devoicing in the development of Yiddish’, in Kachru, B., Lees, R. B. and Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Issues in linguistics: Papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 790–7.Google Scholar

Schiefner, A. 1863. Versuch über die Sprache der Uden. Mémoires de l’Académie impériale des sciences de St.-Pétersbourg, 7th series, 6(8). St Petersburg: Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Stemberger, J. P. and MacWhinney, B. 1986. ‘Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms’, Memory and Cognition 14: 17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Trask, R. L. 1996. Historical Linguistics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar