Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T13:47:54.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2018

Angus S. Macdonald
Affiliation:
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh
Stephen J. Richards
Affiliation:
Longevitas Ltd, Edinburgh
Iain D. Currie
Affiliation:
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalen, O. O. 1975. Statistical inference for a family of counting processes. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Aalen, O. O. 1978. Non-parametric inference for a family of counting processes. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 701726.Google Scholar
Aalen, O. O. 1987. Dynamic modelling and causality. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1987, 177190.Google Scholar
Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Pages 267281 of: Petrov, B. and Cźaki, F. (eds), 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory. Akademiai Kiadó, Budapest.Google Scholar
Akaike, H. 1987. Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrica, 52, 317333.Google Scholar
Andersen, P. K., Borgan, Ø., Gill, R. D. and Keiding, N. 1993. Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Arjas, E. 1989. Survival models and martingale dynamics. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 16, 177225.Google Scholar
Arjas, E. and Harra, P. 1984. A marked point process approach to censored failure data with complicated covariates. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 11, 193209.Google Scholar
Bailey, W. G. and Haycocks, H. W. 1947. A synthesis of methods of deriving measures of decrement from observed data. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 73, 179212 (with discussion).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, R. E. 1959. Note on some mathematical mortality models. Pages 302311 of: Wolstenholme, G. E. W. and O’Connor, M. (eds), The Lifespan of Animals. Little, Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
Benjamin, B. and Pollard, J.H. 1980. The Analysis of Mortality and Other Actuarial Statistics. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Bielecki, T. R. and Rutkowski, M. 2002. Credit Risk: Modeling, Valuation and Hedging. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Booth, H. and Tickle, L. 2008. Mortality modelling and forecasting: A review of methods. Annals of Actuarial Science, 3(I/II), 344.Google Scholar
Bowers, N. L., Gerber, H. U., Hickman, J. C., Jones, D. A. and Nesbitt, C. J. 1986. Actuarial Mathematics. Society of Actuaries, Itasca, IL.Google Scholar
Brouhns, N., Denuit, M. and Vermunt, J. K. 2002. A Poisson log-bilinear approach to the construction of projected lifetables. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 31 (3), 373393.Google Scholar
Cairns, A. J. G., Blake, D. and Dowd, K. 2006. A two-factor model for stochastic mortality with parameter uncertainty: Theory and calibration. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73, 687718.Google Scholar
Cairns, A. J. G., Blake, D., Dowd, K., Coughlan, G. D., Epstein, D., Ong, A. and Balevich, I. 2009. A quantitative comparison of stochastic mortality models using data from England and Wales and the United States. North American Actuarial Journal, 13 (1), 135.Google Scholar
Camarda, C. G. 2012. MortalitySmooth: An R package for smoothing Poisson counts with P-splines. Journal of Statistical Software, 50, 124.Google Scholar
Carstairs, V. and Morris, R. 1991. Deprivation and Health in Scotland. Aberdeen University Press, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Collett, D. 2003. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research, second edn. Chapman &Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
Conte, S. D. and de Boor, C. 1981. Elementary Numerical Analysis: An Algorithmic Approach, third edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Continuous Mortality Investigation. 1991. Continuous Mortality Investigation Report No. 12. Institute of Actuaries and Faculty of Actuaries, London.Google Scholar
Continuous Mortality Investigation. 2007. Working Paper 26: Extensions to Younger Ages of the “00” Series Pensioner Tables of Mortality. Institute of Actuaries and Faculty of Actuaries, London.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. 1972. Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 24, 187220 (with discussion).Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. and Hinkley, D. V. 1974. Theoretical Statistics. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. and Miller, H. D. 1987. The Theory of Stochastic Processes. Science Paperbacks, vol. 134. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Crowder, M. 1991. On the identifiability crisis in competing risks analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 18, 222233.Google Scholar
Crowder, M. 2001. Classical Competing Risks. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
Currie, I. D. 2013. Smoothing constrained generalized linear models with an application to the Lee–Carter model. Statistical Modelling, 13, 6993.Google Scholar
Currie, I. D. 2016. On fitting generalized linear and non-linear models of mortality. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2016, 356383.Google Scholar
Currie, I. D., Durban, M. and Eilers, P. H. C. 2004. Smoothing and forecasting mortality rates. Statistical Modelling, 4, 279298.Google Scholar
Delwarde, A., Denuit, M. and Eilers, P. H. C. 2007. Smoothing the Lee–Carter and Poisson log-bilinear models for mortality forecasting: A penalized likelihood approach. Statistical Modelling, 7, 2948.Google Scholar
Dickson, D. C. M., Hardy, M. R. and Waters, H. R. 2013. Actuarial Mathematics for Life Contingent Risks, second edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Djeundje, V. A. B. and Currie, I. D. 2011. Smoothing dispersed counts with applications to mortality data. Annals of Actuarial Science, 5(I), 3352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A. J. 2002. An Introduction to Statistical Modelling. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Durbin, J. and Watson, G. S. 1971. Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression, III. Biometrika, 58 (1), 119.Google Scholar
Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. J. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap, first edn. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, vol. 57. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Eilers, P. H. C. and Marx, B. D. 1996. Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties. Statistical Science, 11, 89121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, W. 1950. An Introduction to Probability and its Applications, third edn. Vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Fleming, T. R. and Harrington, D. P. 1991. Counting Processes and Survival Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Forfar, D. O., McCutcheon, J. J. and Wilkie, A. D. 1988. On graduation by mathematical formula. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 115, 1149.Google Scholar
Gerber, H.U. 1990. Life Insurance Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, and the Swiss Association of Actuaries, Zurich.Google Scholar
Gini, C. 1921. Measurement of inequality of incomes. The Economic Journal, 31 (121), 124126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girosi, F. and King, G. 2008. Demographic Forecasting. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Gompertz, B. 1825. The nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 115, 513585.Google Scholar
Green, P. J. and Silverman, B. W. 1994. Nonparametric Regression and Generalized Linear Models: A Roughness Penalty Approach. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M. 1926. The natural duration of cancer. Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects, 33, 126.Google Scholar
Hannan, E. J. and Quinn, B. G. 1979. The determination of the order of an autoregression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 41, 190195.Google Scholar
Hardy, M. R. 2006. An Introduction to Risk Measures for Actuarial Applications. Construction and Evaluation of Actuarial Models Study Note. Society of Actuaries, Schaumburg, IL, and Casualty Actuarial Society, Arlington, VA. Available online at www.casact.org/library/studynotes/hardy4.pdf.Google Scholar
Harrell, F. E. and Davis, C. E. 1982. A new distribution-free quantile estimator. Biometrika, 69, 635640.Google Scholar
Hastie, T. J. and Tibshirani, R. J. 1990. Generalized Additive Models. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Hattendorff, K. 1868. Das Risiko bei der Lebensversicherung. Masius Rundschau der Versicherungen, 18, 169183.Google Scholar
Haycocks, H. W. and Perks, W. 1955. Mortality and Other Investigations. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hoem, J. M. 1969. Markov chain models in life insurance. Blätter der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Versicherungsmathematik, 9, 91107.Google Scholar
Hoem, J. M. 1988. The versatility of the Markov chain as a tool in the mathematics of life insurance. Transactions of the 23rd International Congress of Actuaries, Helsinki, S, 171202.Google Scholar
Hoem, J. M. and Aalen, O. O. 1978. Actuarial values of payment streams. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1978, 3847.Google Scholar
Hurvich, C. M. and Tsai, C. L. 1989. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika, 76 (2), 297307.Google Scholar
Hyndman, R.J. and Fan, Y. 1996. Sample quantiles in statistical packages. American Statistician, 50 (4), 361365.Google Scholar
Kahan, W. 1965. Further remarks on reducing truncation errors. Communications of the ACM, 8 (I), 40.Google Scholar
Kaishev, V. K., Haberman, S. and Dimitrova, S. 2009. Spline Graduation of Crude Mortality Rates for the English Life Table 16. Office for National Statistics, London. Pages 1424.Google Scholar
Kalbfleisch, J. D. and Prentice, R. L. 2002. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, second edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. L. and Meier, P. 1958. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 457481.Google Scholar
Karr, A. F. 1991. Point Processes and their Statistical Inference, second edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, Basel.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A. 1973. The Advanced Theory of Statistics, third edn. Vol. 2. Griffin, London.Google Scholar
Kleinow, T. and Richards, S. J. 2016. Parameter risk in time-series mortality forecasts. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2017 (9), 804828.Google Scholar
Lawless, J. F. 1987. Negative binomial and mixed Poisson regression. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 15, 209225.Google Scholar
Lee, R. D. and Carter, L. 1992. Modeling and forecasting US mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 659671.Google Scholar
Li, J. S. H., Hardy, M. R. and Tan, K. S. 2009. Uncertainty in mortality forecasting: An extension to the classic Lee–Carter approach. Astin Bulletin, 39, 137164.Google Scholar
Macdonald, A. S. 1996. An actuarial survey of statistical models for decrement and transition data, III: Counting process models. British Actuarial Journal, 2, 703726.Google Scholar
Madrigal, A., Matthews, F., Patel, D., Gaches, A. and Baxter, S. 2011. What longevity predictors should be allowed for when valuing pension scheme liabilities? British Actuarial Journal, 16 (I), 162 (with discussion).Google Scholar
Makeham, W. M. 1860. On the law of mortality and the construction of annuity tables. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries and Assurance Magazine, 8, 301310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. 1989. Generalized Linear Models, second edn. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, vol. 37. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, J. J. 1985. Experiments in graduating the data for the English Life Tables (No. 14). Transactions of the Faculty of Actuaries, 40, 135147.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, J. J. and Eilbeck, J. C. 1975. Experiments in the graduation of the English Life Tables (No. 13) data. Transactions of the Faculty of Actuaries, 35, 281296.Google Scholar
McLoone, P. 2000. Carstairs Scores for Scottish Postcode Sectors from the 1991 Census. Public Health Research Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Neill, A. 1986. Life Contingencies. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Nelder, J. A. and Wedderburn, R. W. M. 1972. Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 135, Part 3, 370384.Google Scholar
Nelson, W. 1958. Theory and applications of hazard plotting for censored failure times. Technometrics, 14, 945965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawitan, Y. 2001. In All Likelihood: Statistical Modelling and Inference Using Likelihood. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Perks, W. 1932. On some experiments in the graduation of mortality statistics. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 63, 1240.Google Scholar
Perperoglou, A. and Eilers, P. H. C. 2010. Penalized regression with individual deviance effects. Computational Statistics, 25, 341361.Google Scholar
Philips, L. 1990. Hanging on the metaphone. Computer Language, 7 (12), 3943.Google Scholar
Prentice, R. L., Kalbfleisch, J. D., Peterson, A. V., Jr., Flournoy, N. S., Farewell, V. T. and Breslow, N. E. 1978. The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics, 34, 541554.Google Scholar
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. and Flannery, B. P. 1986. Numerical Recipes in C++: The Art of Scientific Computing, second edn. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ramlau-Hansen, H. 1988. Hattendorff’s theorem: A Markov chain and counting process approach. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1988, 143156.Google Scholar
Renshaw, A. E. and Haberman, S. 2006. A cohort-based extension to the Lee–Carter model for mortality reduction factors. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38, 556570.Google Scholar
Richards, S. J. 2008. Applying survival models to pensioner mortality data. British Actuarial Journal, 14 (II), 257326 (with discussion).Google Scholar
Richards, S. J. 2009. Selected issues in modelling mortality by cause and in small populations. British Actuarial Journal, 15 (supplement), 267283.Google Scholar
Richards, S. J. 2012. A handbook of parametric survival models for actuarial use. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2012 (4), 233257.Google Scholar
Richards, S. J. 2016. Mis-estimation risk: Measurement and impact. British Actuarial Journal, 21 (3), 429457.Google Scholar
Richards, S. J. and Currie, I. D. 2009. Longevity risk and annuity pricing with the Lee–Carter model. British Actuarial Journal, 15 (II) No. 65, 317365 (with discussion).Google Scholar
Richards, S. J. and Jones, G. L. 2004. Financial Aspects of Longevity Risk. Staple Inn Actuarial Society (SIAS), London.Google Scholar
Richards, S. J., Kirkby, J. G. and Currie, I. D. 2006. The importance of year of birth in two-dimensional mortality data. British Actuarial Journal, 12 (I), 561 (with discussion).Google Scholar
Richards, S. J., Kaufhold, K. and Rosenbusch, S. 2013. Creating portfolio-specific mortality tables: A case study. European Actuarial Journal, 3 (2), 295319.Google Scholar
Richards, S. J., Currie, I. D. and Ritchie, G. P. 2014. A value-at-risk framework for longevity trend risk. British Actuarial Journal, 19 (1), 116167.Google Scholar
Schwarz, G. E. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6 (2), 461464.Google Scholar
Shumway, R. H. and Stoffer, D. S. 2010. Time Series Analysis and its Applications, third edn. Springer, London.Google Scholar
Spencer, J. 1904. On the graduation of the rates of sickness and mortality. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 38, 334343.Google Scholar
Sverdrup, E. 1965. Estimates and test procedures in connection with stochastic models for deaths, recoveries and transfers between states of health. Skandinavisk Aktuaritidskrift, 48, 184211.Google Scholar
Thatcher, A.R., Kannisto, V. and Vaupel, J.W. 1998. The Force of Mortality at Ages 80 to 100. Odense University Press, Odense.Google Scholar
The Economist . 2012. The ferment of finance. Special report on financial innovation. 25 February 2012, 8.Google Scholar
Thurston, S. W., Wand, M. P. and Wiencke, J. K. 2000. Negative binomial additive models. Biometrics, 56, 139144.Google Scholar
Tsiatis, A. A. 1975. A nonidentifiability aspect of the problem of competing risks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 72, 2022.Google Scholar
Turner, H. and Firth, D. 2012. Generalized non-linear models in R: An overview of the gnm package (R package version 1.0–6). Available online at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gnm.Google Scholar
Waters, H. R. 1984. An approach to the study of multiple state models. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 111, 363374.Google Scholar
Wedderburn, R. W. M. 1974. Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss–Newton method. Biometrika, 61, 439447.Google Scholar
Whittaker, E. T. 1923. On a new method of graduation. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 41, 6375.Google Scholar
Willets, R. C. 1999. Mortality in the Next Millennium. Staple Inn Actuarial Society (SIAS), London.Google Scholar
Willets, R. C. 2004. The cohort effect: Insights and explanations. British Actuarial Journal, 10, 833877.Google Scholar
Williams, D. 1991. Probability with Martingales. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wood, S. N. 2006. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×