Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T14:03:50.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2023

Graham Zanker
Graham Zanker
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Fate and the Hero in Virgil's Aeneid
Stoic World Fate and Human Responsibility
 , pp. 233 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnell, P. 2004. ‘Wed or Unwed? Ambiguity in Aeneid 4’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 25: 95–110Google Scholar
Ahl, F. M. 1976. Lucan: An Introduction. Ithaca, NY. Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Ando, C. 2011. Law, Language, and Empire in the Roman Tradition. Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar
Ando, C. 2014. ‘Postscript: Cities, Citizenship, and the Work of Empire’, in Rapp, C. and Drake, H. A. (eds.) The City in the Classical and Post-Classical World. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press: pp. 240–56Google Scholar
Ando, C. 2017. ‘Empire and Aftermath’, in Lizzi, Testa, R. (ed.) Late Antiquity in Contemporary Debate. Newcastle upon Tyne. Cambridge Scholars Publishing: pp. 2–14Google Scholar
Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A., and Skinner, M. B. (eds.) 2004. Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. Austin. University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar
Arnim, H. F. A. von 1964 (repr. of 1905–24 ed.). Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. 4 vols. Stuttgart. TeubnerGoogle Scholar
Asmis, E. 1991. ‘Philodemus’ Poetic Theory and “On the Good King According to Homer”’, Classical Antiquity 10: 1–45Google Scholar
Austin, R. G. 1955. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Austin, R. G. 1971. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C. 1935. Religion in Virgil. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1994. ‘Rappresentazioni del dolore e interpretazione nell’Eneide’, Antike und Abendland 40: 109–24Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 2005. ‘Lucan’, in Foley, J. M. (ed.) A Companion to Ancient Epic. Malden, MA. Wiley: pp. 492–502Google Scholar
Berry, D. H. 2014. ‘Did Aeneas Love Dido?’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 28: 197–217Google Scholar
Bleisch, P. R. 1996. ‘On Choosing a Spouse: Aeneid 7.378–84 and Callimachus’ Epigram 1’, American Journal of Philology 117: 455–72Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. 1998. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bowra, C. M. 1933. ‘Aeneas and the Stoic Ideal’, Greece and Rome 3: 8–21, reprinted in Harrison, S. J. (ed.) 1990. Oxford Readings in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford. Oxford University Press: pp. 363–77Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. 1963. La Religion de Virgile. Paris. Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar
Boyle, A. J. 1986. The Chaonian Dove: Studies in the Eclogues, Georgics, and Aeneid of Virgil. Mnemosyne Suppl. 94. Leiden. E. J. BrillGoogle Scholar
Brooks, R. A. 1953. ‘Discolor Aura: Reflections on the Golden Bough’, American Journal of Philology 74: 260–80Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1975. ‘Stoicism and the Principate’, Papers of the British School at Rome 43: 7–35, reprinted in Griffin, M. and Samuels, A. (eds.) 2013. Studies in Stoicism. Oxford. Oxford University Press: pp. 275–309Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. 1963. Vergil über die Sendung Roms: Untersuchungen zum Bellum Poenicum und zur Aeneis. Gymnasium Beih. 3. Heidelberg. Carl Winter VerlagGoogle Scholar
Cairns, D. L. (ed.) 2001. Oxford Readings in Homer’s Iliad. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Camps, W. A. 1969. An Introduction to Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, G. 1945. ‘The Hero and Fate in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Eranos 43: 111–35Google Scholar
Caston, R. R. 2013. The Elegiac Passion: Jealousy in Roman Love Elegy. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Clausen, W. 1964. ‘An Interpretation of the Aeneid’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 68: 139–47Google Scholar
Coleman, R. G. G. 1982. ‘The Gods in the Aeneid’, Greece and Rome 29: 143–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colish, M. L. 1985. The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages, vol. 1, Stoicism in Classical Literature. Studies in the History of Christian Thought 34. Leiden. E. J. BrillGoogle Scholar
Commager, S. 1981. ‘Fateful Words: Some Conversations in Aeneid 4’, Arethusa 14: 101–14Google Scholar
Conington, J. 1872–5. P. Vergili Opera2. 3 vols. London. WhittakerGoogle Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Ithaca, NY. Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Conte, G. B. 2007. The Poetry of Pathos: Studies in Virgilian Epic, with Harrison, S. J. (ed.). Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Conte, G. B. 2009. P. Vergilius Maro: Aeneis. Berlin. Walter de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Cooley, A. E. 2009. RES GESTAE DIVI AUGUSTI: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Cova, P. V. 1994. Virgilio: Il libro terzo dell’Eneide. Milan. Pubblicazioni dell’ Università CattolicaGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. 2012. Parthenope: The Interplay of Ideas in Vergilian Bucolic. Mnemosyne Suppl. 346. Leiden. E. J. BrillGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. 2020. ‘Horace and Vergil’, in Mitsis, P. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Epicurus and Epicureanism. Oxford. Oxford University Press: pp. 456–75Google Scholar
Davis, P. J. 1999. ‘“Since My Part Has Been Well Played”: Conflicting Evaluations of Augustus’, Ramus 28: 1–15Google Scholar
Dick, B. F. 1967. ‘Fatum and Fortuna in Lucan’s Bellum Civile’, Classical Philology 62: 235–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, S. 1992. The Roman Family. Baltimore, MD. Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1951. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley. University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Dyson, J. T. 1996. ‘Dido the Epicurean’, Classical Antiquity 15: 203–21Google Scholar
Dyson, J. T. 1997. ‘Fluctus Irarum, Fluctus Curarum: Lucretian Religio in the Aeneid’, American Journal of Philology 118: 449–57Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. 1960. ‘The Expression of Stoic Ideas in the Aeneid’, Phoenix 14: 151–65Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 1998. ‘Allecto’s First Victim: A Study of Vergil’s Amata, Aeneid 7.341–405 and 12.1–80’, in Stahl, H.-P. (ed.) Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. Swansea. The Classical Press of Wales: pp. 135–53Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 1991. Virgil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. New York. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. 2021. Juno’s Aeneid: A Battle for Heroic Identity. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1984. ‘The Reconciliations of Juno’, Classical Quarterly 34: 188–203Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1991. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A. 1995. ‘Ships of State: Aeneid 5 and Augustan Circus Spectacle’, Classical Antiquity 14: 245–65Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, S. 1992. The Cultural Front: Power and Culture in Revolutionary Russia. Ithaca, NY. Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, F. 1955. Virgil: Aeneid VI. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Flower, H. I. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Flower, H. I. 2000. ‘The Tradition of the Spolia Opima: M. Claudius Marcellus and Augustus’, Classical Antiquity: 34–64Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 1997a. ‘Epicurean Anger’, in Morton Braund, S. and Gill, C. (eds.) The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press: pp. 16–35Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 1997b. ‘Second Thoughts on Closure’, in Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M. and Fowler, D. P. (eds.) Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press: pp. 3–22Google Scholar
Frede, D. 2003. ‘Stoic Determinism’, in Inwood, B. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press: pp. 179–205Google Scholar
Frede, M. 2011. A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought, edited by Long, A. A., with a Foreword by Sedley, D. Berkeley. University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Freer, N. 2019. ‘Virgil’s Georgics and the Epicurean Sirens of Poetry’, in Xinyue, B. and Freer, N. (eds.) Reflections and New Perspectives on Virgil’s Georgics. London. Bloomsbury Publishing: pp.79–90, notes at pp. 211–14Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. 1997. ‘The Shield of Turnus (Aeneid 7.783–92)’, Greece and Rome 44: 176–96Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. 2000. Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1988. ‘The Anger of Aeneas’, The American Journal of Philology 109: 321–48Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1994. ‘How to Be Philosophical about the End of the Aeneid’, Illinois Classical Studies 19: 191–201Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 2003. ‘Greek and Roman Drama and the Aeneid’, in Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.) Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Exeter. Exeter University Press: pp. 275–94Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. 1992. ‘Turnus, Mezentius and the Complexity of Virgil’s Aeneid’, in Deroux, C. (ed.) Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 6, Collection Latomus 217. Brussels. Société pour le progrès des études philologiques et historiques: pp. 295–316Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. 2001. ‘Do Homeric Heroes Make Real Decisions?’, in Cairns, D. L. (ed.) Oxford Readings in Homer’s Iliad. Oxford. Oxford University Press: pp. 147–69Google Scholar
Gill, C. 1998. ‘Altruism or Reciprocity in Greek Ethical Philosophy?’, in Gill, C., Postlethwaite, N., and Seaford, R. (eds.) Reciprocity in Ancient Greece. Oxford. Oxford University Press: pp. 303–28Google Scholar
Gill, C. 2004. ‘Character and Passion in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 25: 111–214Google Scholar
Giusti, E. 2018. Carthage in Virgil’s Aeneid: Staging the Enemy under Augustus. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Gladhill, B. 2016. Rethinking Roman Alliance: A Study in Poetics and Society. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Gómez, L. L. 2014. ‘Chrysippean Compatibilistic Theory of Fate: What Is Up to Us, and Moral Responsibility’, in Destrée, P., Salles, R. and Zingano, M. (eds.) What Is Up to Us? Studies on Agency and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy. Sankt Augustin. Academia Verlag: pp. 121–39Google Scholar
Gordon, P. 1998. ‘Phaeacian Dido: Lost Pleasures of an Epicurean Intertext’, Classical Antiquity 17: 188–211Google Scholar
Gotoff, H. C. 1984. ‘The Transformation of Mezentius’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 114: 191–218Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. 2014. ‘Adsensio in nostra potestate: “From Us” and “Up to Us” in Ancient Stoicism’, in Destrée, P., Salles, R. and Zingano, M. (eds.) What Is Up to Us? Studies on Agency and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy. Sankt Augustin.Academia Verlag: pp. 141–50Google Scholar
Gransden, K. W. 2004. Virgil: The Aeneid, 2nd ed. by Harrison, S. J. (ed.). Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1986. Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1991. ‘The Aeneid and the Oresteia’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 20: 29–45Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1993. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1997. ‘Virgil and Tragedy’, in Martindale, C. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press: pp. 312–26Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1998a. ‘Fame and Defamation in the Aeneid: The Council of the Latins, Aeneid 11.225–467’, in Stahl, H.-P. (ed.) Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. Swansea. The Classical Press of Wales: 243–70Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1998b. Virgil. Greece and Rome: New Surveys in the Classics 28. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2012. Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2014. The Last Trojan Hero: A Cultural History of Virgil’s Aeneid. London. I. B. TaurisGoogle Scholar
Harrison, E. L. 1984. ‘The Aeneid and Carthage’, in Woodman, A. J. and West, D. (eds.). Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press: pp. 95–115, with notes at pp. 214–25Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1986. Review of Schenk, P. 1984. Die Gestalt des Turnus in Vergils Aeneis, Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 164. Königstein. Anton Hain and Renger, C. 1985. Aeneas und Turnus: Analyse einer Feindschaft, Studien zur klassischen Philology 11. Frankfurt am Main. Peter Lang. Classical Review 36: 40–4Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (ed.) 1990. Oxford Readings in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1991. Vergil: Aeneid 10. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1996. ‘Aeneid 1.286: Julius Caesar or Augustus?’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 9: 127–33Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2007. Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Haskins, C. E. 1887. M. Annaei Lucani Pharsalia, with an introduction by W. E. Heitland. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Heinze, R. 1993. Virgil’s Epic Technique. Trans. Harvey, H., Harvey D. H. and Robertson, F. London. Bristol Classical PressGoogle Scholar
Henry, J. 1873–92. Aeneidea, or Critical, Exegetical, and Aesthetical Remarks on the Aeneis. 4 vols. London. Printed for the Trustees of the AuthorGoogle Scholar
Hershkowitz, D. 1998. The Madness of Epic: Reading Insanity from Homer to Statius. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hejduk, J. 2009. ‘Jupiter’s Aeneid: Fama and Imperium’, Classical Antiquity 28: 279–327Google Scholar
Hejduk, J. 2020. The God of Rome: Jupiter in Augustan Poetry. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. and Morwood, J. H. W. 2017. A Commentary on Vergil Aeneid 3. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Highbarger, E. L. 1947–8. ‘The Tragedy of Turnus: A Study of Vergil, Aeneid XII’, Classical Weekly 41: 114–24Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1973–4. ‘Dido in the Light of History’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 12: 1–13, reprinted in Harrison, S. J. (ed.) 1990. Oxford Readings in Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford. Oxford University Press: pp. 127–44Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1991. Virgilio: L’epopea in alambicco. Naples. LiguoriGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1999. Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary. Mnemosyne Suppl. 198. Leiden. E. J. BrillGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N. 2013. Virgil, Aeneid 6: A Commentary. 2 vols. Berlin. Walter de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Janko, R. 1992. The Iliad: A Commentary: Volume IV: Books 13–16. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. R. 1976. Darkness Visible: A Study of Virgil’s Aeneid. Berkeley. University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Kallendorf, C. 1999. ‘Historicizing the “Harvard School”: Pessimistic Readings of the Aeneid in Italian Renaissance Scholarship’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 99: 391–403Google Scholar
Kallendorf, C. 2007. The Other Virgil: ‘Pessimistic’ Readings of the Aeneid in Early Modern Culture. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Keller, O. 1877. Rerum naturalium scriptores graeci minores. Vol. 1. Leipzig. TeubnerGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. 1992. ‘“Augustan” and “Anti-Augustan”: Reflections on Terms of Reference’, in Powell, A. (ed.) Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. London. Bristol Classical Press: pp. 26–58Google Scholar
Kronenberg, L. 2005. ‘Mezentius the Epicurean’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 135: 403–31Google Scholar
Kühn, W. 1971. Götterszenen bei Vergil, Bibliothek der Alterthumswissenschaften, n.F. 2. Reihe, vol. 41. Heidelberg. Carl Winter VerlagGoogle Scholar
La Penna, A. 1967. ‘Amata e Didone’, Maia 19: 309–18Google Scholar
La Penna, A. 1984. ‘Amata’, in Della Corte, F. (ed.) Enciclopedia Virgiliana 1. Rome. Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana Treccani: pp. 125–8Google Scholar
Le Doze, P. 2014. Le Parnasse face à l’Olympe: Poésie et culture politique à l’époque d’Octavien/Auguste. Collection de l’Ècole Française de Rome 484. Rome. Ècole Française de RomeGoogle Scholar
Lesky, A. 1964. Göttliche und menschliche Motivation im homerischen Epos, Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften: Philosophisch-historische Klasse, Abh. 4. Heidelberg. Carl Winter Verlag. Partial Eng. trans. by L. Holford-Strevens, ‘Divine Causation in Homeric Epic’, in Cairns, D. L. (ed.) 2001. Oxford Readings in Homer’s Iliad. Oxford: pp. 170–202Google Scholar
Liebermann, W.-L. 1976. ‘Aeneas – Schicksal und Selbstfindung’, in Görgemanns, H. and Schmidt, E. A. (eds.) Studien zum antiken Epos. Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 72. Meisenheim am Glan. Anton Hain Verlag: pp. 173–207Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1971. ‘Freedom and Determinism in the Stoic Theory of Human Action’, in Long, A. A. (ed.). Problems in Stoicism. London. Athlone Press: pp. 173–99Google Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1983. ‘Vergil and the Politics of War’, Classical Quarterly 33: 188–203Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1987. Further Voices in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1994. ‘Vergil’s Aeneid: Subversion by Intertextuality: Catullus 66.39–40 and Other Examples’, Greece and Rome 41: 187–204. Reprinted in Harrison, S. J. 2007. R. O. A. M. Lyne: Collected Papers on Latin Poetry. Oxford. Oxford University Press: pp. 167–83Google Scholar
Mackie, C. J. 1988. The Characterisation of Aeneas. Edinburgh. Scottish Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1999. ‘Sources’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press: pp. 3–30Google Scholar
Matthaei, L. E. 1917. ‘The Fates, the Gods, and the Freedom of Man’s Will in the Aeneid’, Classical Quarterly 11: 11–26Google Scholar
Moles, J. 1987. ‘The Tragedy and Guilt of Dido’, in Whitby, M., Hardie, P. and Whitby, M. (eds.) Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble. Bristol. Bristol Classical Press: pp. 153–61Google Scholar
Morgan, L. 1999. Patterns of Redemption in Virgil’s Georgics. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Morrison, J. V. 1988. Homeric Misdirection: False Predictions in the ‘Iliad’. Diss., MichiganGoogle Scholar
Morton Braund, S. 1997. ‘Virgil and the Cosmos: Religious and Philosophical Ideas’, in Martindale, C. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press: pp. 204–21.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1965. ‘Philodemus on the Good King according to Homer’, Journal of Roman Studies 55: 161–82Google Scholar
Nappa, C. 2005. Reading after Actium: Vergil’s Georgics, Octavian, and Rome. Ann Arbor. University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Nash, C. 2017. Philosophical Readings in Virgil’s Aeneid. Diss., OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nelis, D. P. 1992. ‘The Aristaeus Episode and Aeneid 1’, in Haan, E. (ed.). From Erudition to Inspiration, Essays in Honour of M. J. Mc. Gann. Belfast Byzantine Texts and Translations 5: pp. 3–18Google Scholar
Nelis, D. P. 2001. Vergil’s Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius, ARCA Classical and Medieval Texts, Papers, and Monographs 39. Cambridge. Francis CairnsGoogle Scholar
Nelis, D. P. 2011. ‘Didactic voices in Vergil’s Aeneid’, in Raymond, E. (ed.) Vox poetae. Manifestations auctoriales dans l’épopée gréco-latine. Actes du colloque organisé les 13 et 14 novembre 2008 par l’Université de Lyon 3. Paris. De Boccard: pp. 275–83Google Scholar
Nelis, D. P. 2014. ‘Vergil’s Library’, in Farrell, J. and Putnam, M. C. J. (eds.) A Companion to Vergil’s Aeneid and Its Tradition. Malden, MA. Wiley: pp. 13–25Google Scholar
Nelis, D. P. 2015. ‘Juno, Sea-Storm and Emotion in Virgil, Aeneid 1.1–156: Homeric and Epicurean Contexts’, in Cairns, D. (ed.) Emotions between Greece and Rome. London. Institute of Classical Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London: pp. 149–61Google Scholar
Neri, V. 1978. ‘Dei, Fato e divinazione nella letteratura latina del I sec. d.C.’, in Temporini, H. and Haase, W. (eds.) Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2,16.3. Berlin. Walter de Gruyter: pp. 1974–2051Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1991. Space, Geography, and Politics in the Early Roman Empire. Ann Arbor. University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 1978. ‘Aeneas Imperator: Roman Generalship in an Epic Context’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 17: 50–61, repr. in Harrison, S. J. (ed.) 1995. R. G. M. Nisbet: Collected Papers on Latin Literature. Oxford. Oxford University Press: pp. 132–43Google Scholar
Norden, E. 1984. P. Vergilius Maro: Aeneis, Buch VI8. Stuttgart. TeubnerGoogle Scholar
Obbink, D. 2004. ‘Vergil’s De pietate: From Ehoiae to Allegory in Vergil, Philodemus, and Ovid’, in Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A., and Skinner, M. B. (eds.) Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. Austin. University of Texas Press: pp. 175–209Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. 1990. Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil’s Aeneid. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. 2007. Inconsistency in Roman Epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. 2017. True Names: Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay. Ann Arbor. University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. 2018. Vergil: Aeneid Book 8. Indianapolis, IN. Hackett Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
Önnerfors, A. 1977. ‘Vergil und das Schicksal’, Classica et Mediaevalia 69: 1–20Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. 2016. ‘The Madness of Elegy: Rationalizing Propertius’, in Hardie, P. (ed.) Augustan Poetry and the Irrational. Oxford. Oxford University Press: pp. 199–217.Google Scholar
Otis, B. 1964. Virgil: A Study in Civilized Poetry. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Pandey, N. B. 2018. The Poetics of Power in Augustan Rome: Latin Poetic Responses to Early Imperial Iconography. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Panoussi, V. 2009. Greek Tragedy in Vergil’s “Aeneid”: Ritual, Empire, and Intertext. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Parry, A. 1963. ‘The Two Voices of Virgil’s Aeneid’, Arion 2: 66–80Google Scholar
Pavlock, B. 1985. ‘Epic and Tragedy in Vergil’s Nisus and Euryalus Episode’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 115: 207–24Google Scholar
Perkell, C. 1999. Reading Vergil’s Aeneid: An Interpretive Guide. Norman, OK. University of Oklahoma PressGoogle Scholar
Pöschl, V. 1964. Die Dichtkunst Virgils: Bild und Symbol in der Äneis2. Vienna. Röhrer, Rudolf M. VerlagGoogle Scholar
Pötscher, W. 1977. Vergil und die göttlichen Mächte: Aspekte einer Weltanschauung, Spudasmata 35. Hildesheim. Georg Olms VerlagGoogle Scholar
Powell, A. 1992. ‘The Aeneid and the Embarrassments of Augustus’, in Powell, A. (ed.) Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. London. Bristol Classical Press: pp. 141–74Google Scholar
Powell, A. 2008. Virgil the Partisan: A Study in the Re-integration of Classics. Swansea. Classical Press of WalesGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. 2006. M. Tulli Ciceronis De Republica, De Legibus, Cato Maior de Senectute, Laelius de Amicitia. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. U. 1925. Collectanea Alexandrina: Reliquiae minores Poetarum Graecorum Aetatis Ptolemaicae 323–146 A. C. Epicorum, Elegiacorum, Lyricorum, Ethicorum. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1965. The Poetry of the Aeneid: Four Studies in Imaginative Unity and Design. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1998. ‘Dido’s Murals and Virgilian Ekphrasis’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 98: 243–75Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 2011. The Humanness of Heroes: Studies in the Conclusion of Virgil’s Aeneid. Amsterdam. Amsterdam University PressGoogle Scholar
Quinn, K. 1968. Virgil’s Aeneid: A Critical Description. London. Routledge and Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
Quint, D. 1993. Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Rabel, R. J. 1981. ‘Vergil, Tops, and the Stoic View of Fate’, Classical Journal 77: 27–31Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2005. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago. The University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Richardson, N. J. 1993, The Iliad: A Commentary Volume V1: Books 21–24 (general ed. Kirk, G. S. ). Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, A. 2017. Virgil’s Ascanius: Imagining the Future in the Aeneid. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Roller, M. B. 2018. Models from the Past in Roman Culture: A World of Exempla. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Rosso, E. 2015. ‘D’Aphrodisias à Orange: Mythes grecs et “styles rétrospectifs” en context public au début du principat’, in Linant de Bellefonds, P., Prioux, É. and Rouveret, A. (eds.). D’Alexandre à Auguste: Dynamiques de la création dans les arts visuels et la poésie. Rennes. Presses Universitaires de Rennes: 249–67Google Scholar
Salles, R. 2005. The Stoics on Determinism and Compatibilism. Aldershot. AshgateGoogle Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. 1989. The Stoics2. London. Bristol Classical Press and Hackett Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
Schauer, M. 2007. Aeneas dux in Vergils Aeneis: Eine literarische Fiktion in augusteischer Zeit, Zetemata 128. Munich. C. H. BeckGoogle Scholar
Scheid, J. 2007. Res Gestae Divi Augusti: Hauts faits du divin Auguste. Paris. Les Belles LettresGoogle Scholar
Schenk, P. 1984. Die Gestalt des Turnus in Vergils Aeneis, Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 164. Königstein. Anton Hain VerlagGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, A. 1990. Selbständigkeit und Abhängigkeit menschlichen Handelns bei Homer: Hermeneutische Untersuchungen zur Psychologie Homers, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz: Abhandlungen der geistes-und sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse, Abh. 5. Stuttgart. Franz Steiner VerlagGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. 1991. The Stoic Idea of the City. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Scodel, R. 2016. ‘Sunt Lacrimae Rerum’, Classical Journal 111: 219–30Google Scholar
Sellar, W. Y. 1897. The Roman Poets of the Augustan Age: Virgil3. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1966. Cicero’s Letters to Atticus, vol. 5. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1986. ‘Tu Marcellus eris’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 199–205Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. 1991. Cicero: On Fate (De Fato) and Boethius: The Consolation of Philosophy IV.5–7, V (Philosophiae Consolationis). Warminster. Aris & PhillipsGoogle Scholar
Skutsch, O. 1985. The Annals of Q. Ennius. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Snell, B. 1948. Die Entdeckung des Geistes: Studien zur Entstehung des europäischen Denkens bei den Griechen. Hamburg. Claassen & Goverts Verlag. Trans. Rosenmeyer, T. G., The Greek Origins of European Thought. 1953. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Stahl, H.-P. 1990. ‘The Death of Turnus: Augustan Vergil and the Political Rival’, in Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M. (eds.) Between Republic and Empire. Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate. Berkeley. University of California Press: 174–211Google Scholar
Stahl, H.-P. 2016. Poetry Underpinning Power: Vergil’s Aeneid: The Epic for Emperor Augustus: A Recovery Study. Swansea. The Classical Press of WalesGoogle Scholar
Stern, J. P. 1973. On Realism. London. Routledge and Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
Steuart, E. M. 1925. The Annals of Quintus Ennius. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Stevens, J. 2007. ‘Platonism and Stoicism in Vergil’s Aeneid’, in Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C. (eds.) Platonic Stoicism, Stoic Platonism: The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity, Ancient and Medieval Philosophy 39. Leuven. Leuven University Press: 87–107Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. 1999. Vergils Aeneis: Epos zwischen Geschichte und Gegenwart. Stuttgart. ReclamGoogle Scholar
Swain, J. W. 1940. ‘The Theory of the Four Monarchies; Opposition History under the Roman Empire’, Classical Philology 35: 1–21Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1939. The Roman Revolution. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. 1982. ‘Aeneas and the Gates of Sleep’, Classical Philology 77: 51–5Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. 1997. ‘Poetry and Power: Virgil’s Poetry in Contemporary Context’, in Martindale, C. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press: pp. 169–87Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. 2012. Virgil: Aeneid Book XII. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1998a. ‘The Isolation of Turnus, Aeneid Book 12’, in Stahl, H.-P. (ed.) Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. Swansea. The Classical Press of Wales: pp. 271–302Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1998b. ‘Tree Violation and Ambivalence in Virgil’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 118: 261–73Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 2001. Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. and Ziolkowski, J. M. (eds.) 2014. The Virgil Encyclopedia. 3 vols. Malden, MA. WileyGoogle Scholar
Thornton, A. 1976. The Living Universe: Gods and Men in Virgil’s Aeneid. Mnemosyne Suppl. 46. Leiden. E. J. Brill. Published in New Zealand by the University of Otago Press, DunedinGoogle Scholar
Treggiari, S. 1991. Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Uden, J. 2014. ‘The Smile of Aeneas’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 114: 71–96Google Scholar
Van Nortwick, T. 1980, ‘Aeneas, Turnus, and Achilles’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 110: 303–14Google Scholar
Van Straaten, M. 1962. Panaetii Rhodii Fragmenta. Philosophia Antiqua 5. Leiden. E. J. BrillGoogle Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1981. ‘The Historical Moment of Tragedy in Greece: Some of the Social and Psychological Conditions’, in Vernant, J.-P. and Vidal-Naquet, P. (eds.) Tragedy and Myth in Ancient Greece. Trans. Lloyd, J. Brighton. The Harvester Press: pp. 1–5Google Scholar
Watson, L. 2003. A Commentary on Horace’s Epodes. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
West, D. 1998. ‘The End and the Meaning: Aeneid 12.791–842’, in Stahl, H.-P. (ed.) Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. Swansea. The Classical Press of Wales: pp. 303–18Google Scholar
Westerman, F. 2010. Engineers of the Soul: In the Footsteps of Stalin’s Writers. London. Harvill Secker. Trans. Garrett, S. of Westerman, F. 2002. Ingenieurs van de ziel. Amsterdam. AtlasGoogle Scholar
Wigodsky, M. 2004. ‘Emotions and Immortality in Philodemus On the Gods 3 and the Aeneid’, in Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A., Skinner, M. (eds.) Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. Austin. University of Texas Press: pp. 211–28Google Scholar
Williams, G. W. 1976. ‘What Is Happening to Interpretation of Virgil’s Aeneid?’, in Muecke, F. (ed.) 1998. The Todd Memorial Lectures: The University of Sydney 1976-1997, Prudentia Supplementary Number 1998. Auckland. Auckland University Press: 1–31Google Scholar
Williams, G. W. 1983. Technique and Ideas in the Aeneid. New Haven, CT. Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. D. 1972. The Aeneid of Virgil. Vol. 1. Basingstoke. MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. D. 1973. The Aeneid of Virgil. Vol. 2. Basingstoke. MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Wlosok, A. 1967. Die Göttin Venus in Vergils Aeneis, Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft n.F. II 21. Heidelberg. Carl Winter VerlagGoogle Scholar
Wlosok, A. 1990. ‘Zwei Beispiele frühchristlicher “Vergilrezeption”: Polemik (Lact., div. inst. 5,10 und Usurpation (Or. Const. 19–21)’, in Pöschl, V. 1983. 2000 Jahre Vergil: Ein Symposion. Wiesbaden. Otto Harrassowitz: pp. 63–86. Reprinted in Heck, E. and Schmidt, E. A. (eds.) Antonie Wlosok: Res humanae – res divinae: Kleine Schriften. Heidelberg. Carl Winter Verlag: pp. 437–59Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 2022. Horace, Odes Book III. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Zanker, G. 1979. ‘The Love-Theme in Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica’, Wiener Studien 13: 52–75Google Scholar
Zanker, G. 1994. The Heart of Achilles: Characterization and Personal Ethics in the Iliad. Ann Arbor. University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Zanker, G. 1998. ‘Beyond Reciprocity: The Akhilleus-Priam Scene in Iliad 24’, in Gill, C., Postlethwaite, N., and Seaford, R. (eds.). Reciprocity in Ancient Greece. Oxford. Oxford University Press: 73–92.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. 2004. Modes of Viewing in Hellenistic Poetry and Art. Madison, WI. The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. 2019. ‘Stoic Cosmic Fate and Roman Imperium in the Aeneid’, Classical Philology 114: 153–63Google Scholar
Zanker, G. 2021. ‘A Note on Anchises’ “Romane” at Aeneid 6.851’, Mnemosyne 74: 329–37Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1996. ‘Natural Law and Poetic Justice: A Carneadean Debate in Cicero and Virgil’, Classical Philology 91: 297–319Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1999. On the Commonwealth and On the Laws. Cambridge. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Graham Zanker, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • Book: Fate and the Hero in Virgil's <I>Aeneid</I>
  • Online publication: 06 April 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009319850.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Graham Zanker, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • Book: Fate and the Hero in Virgil's <I>Aeneid</I>
  • Online publication: 06 April 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009319850.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Graham Zanker, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • Book: Fate and the Hero in Virgil's <I>Aeneid</I>
  • Online publication: 06 April 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009319850.011
Available formats
×