Abogunrin, S. O. “The Three Variant Accounts of Peter’s Call: A Critical and Theological Examination of the Texts.” Journal of Theological Studies 31 (1985): 587–602.Google Scholar

Aland, Barbara, Aland, Kurt, Karavidopoulos, Johannes, Martini, Carlo N., and Metzger, Bruce M., eds. The Greek New Testament. 5th ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2014.Google Scholar

Aletti, Jean-Noël. Saint Paul Épître aux Éphésiens. Etudes bibliques. Paris: Gabalda, 2001.Google Scholar

Allen, David. “The Use of Criteria: The State of the Question.” In Methodology in the Use of the Old Testament in the New, edited by Allen, David and Smith, Steve, 129–41. Library of New Testament Studies 579. London: T&T Clark, 2020.Google Scholar

Allison, Dale C., Jr. The Intertextual Jesus: Scripture in Q. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2000.Google Scholar

Allison, Dale C., Jr. Testament of Abraham. Commentaries on Early Jewish Literature. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2003.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gary A. and Stone, Michael E., eds. A Synopsis of the Books of Adam and Eve. Society of Biblical Literature Early Judaism and Its Literature 17. 2nd ed. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Anderson, Robert A. Signs and Wonders: A Commentary on the Book of Daniel. International Theological Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1984.Google Scholar

Ashmon, Scott A. Birth Annunciations in the Hebrew Bible and Ancient Near East: A Literary Analysis of the Forms and Functions of the Heavenly Foretelling of the Destiny of a Special Child. Lewiston, NY: Mellen, 2012.Google Scholar

Audet, Jean-Paul. “Autour de la théologie de Luc I–II.” Sciences ecclésiastiques 11 (1959): 409–18.Google Scholar

Augustine, . De Civitate Dei: Libri XI–XXII. Edited by Dombart, Bernardus and Kalb, Alphonsus. Corpus Christianorum: Series latina 48. Turnhout: Brepols, 1955.Google Scholar

Aune, David E. Prophecy in Early Christianity and the Ancient Mediterranean World. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1983.Google Scholar

Bates, Matthew W. “Close-Minded Hermeneutics? A Proposed Alternative Translation for Luke 24:45.” Journal of Biblical Literature 129 (2016): 537–57.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. “Anna of the Tribe of Asher (Luke 2:36–38).” Revue biblique 104 (1997): 161–91.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. God Crucified: Monotheism and Christology in the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. “Is ‘High Human Christology’ Sufficient? A Critical Response to J. R. Daniel Kirk’s A Man Attested by God.” Bulletin for Biblical Research 27 (2017): 503–25.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the God of Israel: God Crucified and Other Studies on the New Testament’s Christology of Divine Identity. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard, Davila, James R., and Panayotov, Alexander, eds. Old Testament Pseudepigrapha: More Noncanonical Scriptures. 2 vols. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2013–.Google Scholar

Bauer, Walter, Danker, Frederick W., Arndt, W. F., and Gingrich, F. W., eds. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Baum, Armin D. “Revelatory Experience and Pseudepigraphical Attribution in Early Jewish Apocalypses.” Bulletin for Biblical Research 21 (2011): 65–92.Google Scholar

Beale, G. K. Handbook on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament: Exegesis and Interpretation. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2012.Google Scholar

Beale, G. K. John’s Use of the Old Testament in Revelation. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 166. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1998.Google Scholar

Beale, G. K. A New Testament Biblical Theology: The Unfolding of the Old Testament in the New. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2011.Google Scholar

Beale, G. K. The Use of Daniel in Jewish Apocalyptic Literature and in the Revelation of St. John. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1984.Google Scholar

Beale, G. K. We Become What We Worship: A Biblical Theology of Idolatry. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2008.Google Scholar

Beale, G. K. and Gladd, Benjamin L.. Hidden but Now Revealed: A Biblical Theology of Mystery. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2014.Google Scholar

Beasley-Murray, George R. John. Word Biblical Commentary 36. Waco, TX: Word, 1987.Google Scholar

Beetham, Christopher A. Echoes of Scripture in the Letter of Paul to the Colossians. Biblical Interpretation Series 96. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar

Benko, Stephen. “The Magnificat: A History of the Controversy.” Journal of Biblical Literature 86 (1967): 263–75.Google Scholar

Benoit, Pierre. “‘Et toi-même, un glaive te transpercera l’âme!’ (Luc 2:35).” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 25 (1963): 251–61.Google Scholar

Bensly, R. L. The Fourth Book of Ezra, the Latin Version Edited from the MSS. Texts and Studies 3.2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1895.Google Scholar

Bentzen, Aage. Daniel. Handbuch zum Alten Testament 19. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1952.Google Scholar

Bertrand, Daniel A. La vie grecque d’Adam et Ève: Introduction, texte, traduction et commentaire. Recherches intertestamentaires 1. Paris: Maisonneuve, 1987.Google Scholar

Beyer, Klaus. Die aramäischen Texte vom Toten Meer. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1984.Google Scholar

Bigg, Charles. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistles of St. Peter and St. Jude. 2nd ed. International Critical Commentary. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1902; reprint, 1969.Google Scholar

Bird, Michael F. “The Unity of Luke-Acts in Recent Discussion.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 29 (2007): 425–48.Google Scholar

Blenkinsopp, Joseph. “Prophecy and Priesthood in Josephus.” Journal of Jewish Studies 25 (1974): 239–62.Google Scholar

Bock, Darrell L. Acts. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2007.Google Scholar

Bock, Darrell L. “Jesus as Lord in Acts and in the Gospel Message.” Bibliotheca sacra 143 (1986): 146–54.Google Scholar

Bock, Darrell L. Luke 1:1–9:50. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 1994.Google Scholar

Bock, Darrell L. Luke 9:51–24:53. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 1996.Google Scholar

Bock, Darrell L. Proclamation from Prophecy and Pattern: Lucan Old Testament Christology. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 12. Sheffield: JSOT, 1987.Google Scholar

Bock, Darrell L. A Theology of Luke and Acts. Biblical Theology of the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012.Google Scholar

Bockmuehl, Markus. Revelation and Mystery in Ancient Judaism and Pauline Christianity. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/36. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1990; reprint, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1997.Google Scholar

Bornkamm, Günther. “µυστήριον.” In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, vol. 4, edited by Kittel, Gerhard, translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley, 802–28. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1967.Google Scholar

Bovon, François. Luke 1: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 1:1–9:50. Translated by Christine M. Thomas. Hermeneia: A Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2002.Google Scholar

Bovon, François. Luke 3: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 19:28–24:53. Hermeneia: A Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2012.Google Scholar

Bronner, Leila L. “Biblical Prophetesses through Rabbinic Lenses.” Judaism 40 (1991): 171–83.Google Scholar

Brown, Jeannine K. “Creation’s Renewal in the Gospel of John.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 72 (2010): 275–90.Google Scholar

Brown, Jeannine K. “Metalepsis.” In Exploring Intertextuality: Diverse Strategies for New Testament Interpretation of Texts, edited by Oropeza, B. J. and Moyise, Steve, 29–41. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2016.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. Rev. ed. Anchor Bible Reference Library. New York: Doubleday, 1993.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. The Gospel according to John (i–xii). Anchor Bible. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. “The Meaning of Modern New Testament Studies for an Ecumenical Understanding of Mary.” In Brown, Raymond E., Biblical Reflections on Crises Facing the Church, 84–108. New York: Paulist, 1975.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. The Semitic Background of the Term “Mystery” in the New Testament. Facet Books, Biblical Series 21. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1968.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E., Donfried, Karl P., Fitzmyer, Joseph A., and Reumann, John, eds. Mary in the New Testament: A Collaborative Assessment by Protestant and Roman Catholic Scholars. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1978.Google Scholar

Bruce, F. F. The Book of Acts. Rev. ed. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1988.Google Scholar

Bruce, F. F. “The Book of Daniel and the Qumran Community.” In Neotestamentica et Semitica: Studies in Honour of Matthew Black, edited by Earle Ellis, E. and Wilcox, Max, 221–35. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1969.Google Scholar

Buckwalter, H. Douglas. The Character and Purpose of Luke’s Christology. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Buckwalter, H. Douglas. “The Divine Saviour.” In Witness to the Gospel: The Theology of Acts, edited by Howard Marshall, I. and Peterson, David, 107–23. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar

Burrows, Eric. “The Gospel of the Infancy: The Form of Luke Chapters 1 and 2.” In The Gospel of the Infancy and Other Biblical Essays, edited by Edmund, F. Sutcliffe, 1–58. Bellarmine Series 6. London: Burns, Oates & Washbourne, 1940.Google Scholar

Byrskog, Samuel. Story as History, History as Story. Boston: Brill Academic, 2002.Google Scholar

Cadbury, Henry J. The Making of Luke-Acts. Rev. ed. London: SPCK, 1958; reprint, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1999.Google Scholar

Caragounis, Chrys C. The Ephesian Mysterion: Meaning and Content. Coniectanea Biblica: New Testament Series 8. Uppsala: Gleerup, 1977.Google Scholar

Carroll, John T. Luke: A Commentary. New Testament Library. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2012.Google Scholar

Carson, D. A. The Gospel according to John. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1991.Google Scholar

Casey, Maurice. “Porphyry and the Origin of the Book of Daniel.” Journal of Theological Studies 27 (1976): 15–33.Google Scholar

Catholic Church. Catechism of the Catholic Church with Modifications from the Editio Typica. 2nd ed. New York: Doubleday, 1997.Google Scholar

Charles, R. H. The Assumption of Moses. London: Black, 1897.Google Scholar

Charles, R. H. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Book of Daniel: With Introduction, Indexes and a New English Translation. Oxford: Clarendon, 1929.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, James H., ed. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. 2 vols. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1983–85.Google Scholar

Chester, Andrew. “The Christ of Paul.” In Redemption and Resistance: The Messianic Hopes of Jews and Christians in Antiquity, edited by Bockmuehl, Markus and Paget, James C., 109–21. London: T&T Clark, 2007.Google Scholar

Chester, Andrew. “High Christology – Whence, When and Why?” Early Christianity 2 (2011): 22–50.Google Scholar

Chester, Andrew. Messiah and Exaltation: Jewish Messianic and Visionary Traditions and New Testament Christology. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 207. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007.Google Scholar

Clarke, E. G., Aufrecht, W. E., Hurd, J. C., and Spitzer, F., eds. Targum Pseudo-Jonathan of the Pentateuch: Text and Concordance. Hoboken, NJ: Ktav, 1984.Google Scholar

Coggins, R. J. and Knibb, Michael A.. The First and Second Books of Esdras. Cambridge Bible Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Mark. The Birth of the Lucan Narrative: Narrative as Christology in Luke 1–2. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 88. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1993.Google Scholar

Collins, John J. The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to Jewish Apocalyptic Literature. 3rd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2016.Google Scholar

Collins, John J. The Apocalyptic Vision of the Book of Daniel. Harvard Semitic Monographs 16. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Collins, John J. Daniel: A Commentary on the Book of Daniel. Hermeneia: A Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1993.Google Scholar

Collins, John J. “Introduction: Towards the Morphology of a Genre.” Semeia 14 (1979): 1–20.Google Scholar

Collins, John J. “Sibylline Oracles: A New Translation and Introduction.” In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, vol. 1, edited by Charlesworth, James H., 317–472. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1983.Google Scholar

Conzelmann, Hans. Acts of the Apostles: A Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles. Hermeneia: A Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1987.Google Scholar

Cook, L. Stephen. On the Question of the “Cessation of Prophecy” in Ancient Judaism. Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum 145. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.Google Scholar

Creed, John M. The Gospel according to St. Luke: The Greek Text with Introduction, Notes, and Indices. London: Macmillan, 1930.Google Scholar

Crisp, Oliver D. “The ‘Fittingness’ of the Virgin Birth.” In Crisp, Oliver D., God Incarnate: Explorations in Christology, 77–102. London: T&T Clark, 2009.Google Scholar

Croy, N. Clayton and Connor, Alice E.. “Mantic Mary? The Virgin Mother as Prophet in Luke 1.26–56 and the Early Church.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 34 (2012): 254–76.Google Scholar

Daniélou, Jean. The Infancy Narratives. New York: Herder & Herder, 1968.Google Scholar

Danker, Frederick W. Jesus and the New Age: A Commentary on St. Luke’s Gospel. Rev. ed. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1988.Google Scholar

Davila, James R. “Aramaic Levi: A New Translation and Introduction.” In Old Testament Pseudepigrapha: More Noncanonical Scriptures, vol. 1, edited by Bauckham, Richard, Davila, James R., and Panayotov, Alexander, 121–42. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2013.Google Scholar

Deden, D. “Le ‘Mystère’ Paulinien.” Ephemerides theologicae lovanienses 13 (1936): 405–42.Google Scholar

de Jonge, Henk J. “Sonship, Wisdom, Infancy: Luke 2:41–51a.” New Testament Studies 24 (1978): 317–54.Google Scholar

de Jonge, Marinus with Hollander, Harm W., de Jonge, Henk J., and Korteweg, Th.. The Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs: A Critical Edition of the Greek Text. Pseudepigrapha Veteris Testamenti Graece 1.2. Leiden: Brill, 1978.Google Scholar

Derrett, J. Duncan M. “The Manger at Bethlehem: Light on St. Luke’s Technique from Contemporary Jewish Religious Law.” Studia Evangelica 2 (1978): 39–47.Google Scholar

Dillon, Richard J. The Hymns of Saint Luke: Lyricism and Narrative Strategy in Luke 1–2). Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 50. Washington, DC: Catholic Biblical Association, 2013.Google Scholar

Dobroruka, Vicente. Second Temple Pseudepigraphy: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Apocalyptic Texts and Related Literature. Ekstasis 4. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2014.Google Scholar

Drawnel, Henryk. An Aramaic Wisdom Text from Qumran: A New Interpretation of the Levi Document. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 86. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G. Christology in the Making: A New Testament Inquiry into the Origins of the Doctrine of the Incarnation. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster, 1980.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G. Jesus Remembered. Christianity in the Making 1. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G. “Review of Simon Gathercole, The Preexistent Son: Recovering the Christologies of Matthew, Mark, and Luke.” Review of Biblical Literature 9 (2007): 378–84.Google Scholar

Edlin, Jim. Daniel: A Commentary in the Wesleyan Tradition. New Beacon Bible Commentary. Kansas City, MO: Beacon Hill, 2009.Google Scholar

Edwards, James R. The Gospel according to Luke. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015.Google Scholar

Edwards, James R. The Gospel according to Mark. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002.Google Scholar

Edwards, James R. “Parallels and Patterns between Luke and Acts.” Bulletin for Biblical Research 27 (2017): 485–501.Google Scholar

Ehrman, Bart D. The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Elliott, John H. 1 Peter. Anchor Bible 37b. New York: Doubleday, 2000.Google Scholar

Erdmann, Gottfried. Die Vorgeschichten des Lukas- und Matthäus-Evangelium und Vergils vierte Ekloge. Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des alten und neuen Testaments 2/30. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1932.Google Scholar

Evans, Craig A. Ancient Texts for New Testament Studies: A Guide to the Background Literature. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2005.Google Scholar

Evans, Craig A. and Sanders, James A., eds. Paul and the Scriptures of Israel. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 83. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1993.Google Scholar

Fabry, Heinz-Josef. “ ֵלב.” In Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, vol. 7, edited by Botterweck, G. Johannes, Ringgren, Helmer, and Fabry, Heinz-Josef, translated by David E. Green, 399–437. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar

Farris, Stephen. The Hymns of Luke’s Infancy Narratives: Their Origin, Meaning, and Significance. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 9. Sheffield: JSOT, 1985.Google Scholar

Feuillet, Andre. Jesus and His Mother: According to the Lucan Infancy Narratives, and according to St. John: The Role of the Virgin Mary in Salvation History and the Place of Woman in the Church. Translated by Leonard Maluf. Studies in Scripture. Still River, MA: St. Bede’s, 1984.Google Scholar

Figueras, Paul. “Syméon et Anne, ou le témoignage de la loi et des prophètes.” Novum Testamentum 20 (1978): 84–99.Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Genesis Apocryphon of Qumran Cave 1. 2nd ed. Biblica et orientalia 18a. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1971.Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Gospel according to Luke (I–IX): Introduction, Translation, and Notes. Anchor Bible 28. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1981.Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Gospel according to Luke (X–XXIV): Introduction, Translation, and Notes. Anchor Bible 28a. New York: Doubleday, 1985.Google Scholar

Fletcher-Louis, Crispin. Jesus Monotheism. 4 vols. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2015–.Google Scholar

Fletcher-Louis, Crispin. “The Worship of Divine Humanity as God’s Image and the Worship of Jesus.” In The Jewish Roots of Christological Monotheism: Papers from the St. Andrews Conference on the Historical Origins of the Worship of Jesus, edited by Newman, Carey C., Davila, James R., and Lewis, Gladys S., 112–28. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 63. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar

Flint, Peter W. “The Daniel Tradition at Qumran.” In The Book of Daniel: Composition and Reception, vol. 2, edited by Collins, John J. and Flint, Peter W., 329–67. Supplements to Vetus Testamentum 83. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar

Forbes, Greg W. and Harrower, Scott D.. Raised from Obscurity: A Narratival and Theological Study of the Characterization of Women in Luke-Acts. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2015.Google Scholar

Foskett, Mary F. A Virgin Conceived: Mary and Classical Representations of Virginity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Foster, Paul. “Echoes without Resonance: Critiquing Certain Aspects of Recent Scholarly Trends in the Study of the Jewish Scriptures in the New Testament.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 38 (2015): 96–111.Google Scholar

Friedeman, Caleb T. “Jesus’ Davidic Lineage and the Case for Jewish Adoption.” New Testament Studies 66 (2020): 249–67.Google Scholar

Friedeman, Caleb T. and Otten, Jeremy D.. “A Reception History and English Translation of Frans Neirynck, Maria bewaarde al de woorden in haar hart.” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 97 (2021): 647–76.Google Scholar

García Serrano, Andrés. “Anna’s Characterization in Luke 2:36–38: A Case of Conceptual Allusion?” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 76 (2014): 464–80.Google Scholar

García Serrano, Andrés. The Presentation in the Temple: The Narrative Function of Lk 2:22–39 in Luke-Acts. Analecta biblica 197. Rome: Gregorian & Biblical, 2012.Google Scholar

Garland, David E. Luke. Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament 3. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011.Google Scholar

Gathercole, Simon J. “The Heavenly ἀνατολή (Luke 1:78–9).” Journal of Theological Studies 56 (2005): 471–88.Google Scholar

Gathercole, Simon J. The Preexistent Son: Recovering the Christologies of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2006.Google Scholar

Gaventa, Beverly Roberts. “‘All Generations Will Call Me Blessed’: Mary in Biblical and Ecumenical Perspective.” In A Feminist Companion to Mariology, edited by Levine, Amy-Jill with Robbins, Maria Mayo, 121–29. Feminist Companion to the New Testament and Early Christian Writings 10. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar

Gaventa, Beverly Roberts. Mary: Glimpses of the Mother of Jesus. Studies on Personalities of the New Testament. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1999.Google Scholar

Geissen, Angelo, ed. Der Septuaginta-Text des Buches Daniel, Kap. 5–12, zusammen mit Susanna, Bel et Draco, sowie Esther, Kap. 1, 1a–2, 15, nach dem Kölner Teil des Papyrus 967. Papyrologische Texte und Abhandlungen 5. Bonn: Rudolph Habelt, 1968.Google Scholar

Geldenhuys, Norval. Commentary on the Gospel of Luke. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1951; reprint, 1968.Google Scholar

George, Augustin. “Le parallèle entre Jean-Baptiste et Jésus en Lc 1–2.” In Augustin George, Études sur l’œuvre de Luc, 43–65. Sources bibliques. Paris: Gabalda, 1978.Google Scholar

Gladd, Benjamin L. Revealing the Mysterion: The Use of Mystery in Daniel and Second Temple Judaism with Its Bearing on First Corinthians. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 160. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar

Goldingay, John E. Daniel. Word Biblical Commentary 30. Dallas, TX: Word, 1989.Google Scholar

Goppelt, Leonhard. A Commentary on I Peter. Edited by Hahn, Ferdinand. Translated by John E. Alsup. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1993.Google Scholar

Green, Joel B. “Good News to the Poor: A Lukan Leitmotif.” Review and Expositor 111 (2014): 173–79.Google Scholar

Green, Joel B. “Good News to Whom? Jesus and the ‘Poor’ in the Gospel of Luke.” In Jesus of Nazareth: Lord and Christ: Essays on the Historical Jesus and New Testament Christology, edited by Green, Joel B. and Turner, Max, 59–74. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1994.Google Scholar

Green, Joel B. The Gospel of Luke. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1997.Google Scholar

Green, Joel B. “Luke-Acts, or Luke and Acts? A Reaffirmation of Narrative Unity.” In Reading Acts Today: Essays in honour of Loveday C. A. Alexander, edited by Walton, Steve, Philips, Thomas E., Pietersen, Lloyd K., and Spencer, F. Scott, 101–19. Library of New Testament Studies 427. London: T&T Clark, 2011.Google Scholar

Green, Joel B. The Theology of the Gospel of Luke. New Testament Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Green, Joel B. “Wealthy … Who? Me? Surprising Perspectives on Faith and Wealth from Luke-Acts.” Living Pulpit 12 (2003): 18–19.Google Scholar

Greenfield, Jonas C., Stone, Michael, and Eshel, Esther. The Aramaic Levi Document. Studia in Veteris Testamenti pseudepigrapha 19. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar

Gregory, Andrew. “The Reception of Luke and Acts and the Unity of Luke-Acts.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 29 (2007): 459–72.Google Scholar

Gregory, Andrew. The Reception of Luke and Acts in the Period before Irenaeus. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/169. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 2003.Google Scholar

Grundmann, Walter. Das Evangelium nach Lukas. 7th ed. Theologischer Handkommentar zum Neuen Testament 3. Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 1974.Google Scholar

Guelich, Robert A. Mark 1–8:26. Word Biblical Commentary 34a. Dallas, TX: Word, 1989.Google Scholar

Guthrie, George H. “Hebrews.” In Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament, edited by Beale, G. K. and Carson, D. A., 919–95. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2007.Google Scholar

Haenchen, Ernst. John 2: A Commentary on the Gospel of John Chapters 7–21. Hermeneia: A Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1984.Google Scholar

Hamm, Dennis. “The Tamid Service in Luke-Acts: The Cultic Background behind Luke’s Theology of Worship (Luke 1:5–25; 18:9–14; 24:50–53; Acts 3:1; 10:3, 30.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 65 (2003): 215–31.Google Scholar

Hann, Robert R. “Christos Kyrios in PsSol 17.32: ‘The Lord’s Anointed’ Reconsidered.” New Testament Studies 31 (1985): 620–27.Google Scholar

Harrington, Daniel J. “The Apocalypse of Hannah: Targum Jonathan of 1 Samuel 2:1–10.” In “Working with No Data”: Semitic and Egyptian Studies Presented to Thomas O. Lambdin, edited by Golomb, David M. and Hollis, Susan T, 147–52. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1987.Google Scholar

Harrington, Daniel J. and Saldarini, Anthony J., eds. Targum Jonathan of the Former Prophets: Introduction, Translation and Notes. The Aramaic Bible 10. Wilmington, DL: Glazier, 1987.Google Scholar

Hartman, Louis F. and Di Lella, Alexander A.. The Book of Daniel. Anchor Bible 23. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1978.Google Scholar

Hay, David M. Glory at the Right Hand: Psalm 110 in Early Christianity. Society of Biblical Literature Monograph Series 18. Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1973.Google Scholar

Hays, Richard B. Echoes of Scripture in the Gospels. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Hays, Richard B. Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Hays, Richard B. “Netted.” In The Art of Reading Scripture, edited by Davis, Ellen F. and Hays, Richard B, 311–16. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar

Hays, Richard B. “‘Who Has Believed Our Message?’ Paul’s Reading of Isaiah.” Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers 37 (1998): 205–25. Repr. in John M. Court, ed. New Testament Writers in the Old Testament: An Introduction, 46–70. London: SPCK, 2002. Repr. in Richard B. Hays. The Conversion of the Imagination: Paul as Interpreter of Israel’s Scripture, 25–49. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar

Hendriksen, William. Exposition of the Gospel according to Luke. New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1978.Google Scholar

Hendriksen, William. Mark. New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1975.Google Scholar

Henrichs-Tarasenkova, Nina. Luke’s Christology of Divine Identity. Library of New Testament Studies 542. London: T&T Clark, 2016.Google Scholar

Hilgenfeld, Adolphus. Messias Judaeorum, Libris eorum Paulo ante et Paulo post Christum natum conscriptis illustratus. Leipzig: Sumptu Fuesiano, 1869.Google Scholar

Hill, Wesley. Paul and the Trinity: Persons, Relations, and the Pauline Letters. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015.Google Scholar

Hippolytus, . Commentaire sur Daniel. Edited by Bardy, Gustave and Lefèvre, Maurice. Sources chrétiennes 14. Paris: Cerf, 1947; reprint, 2006.Google Scholar

Hollander, H. W. and de Jonge, Marinus. The Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs: A Commentary. Studia in Veteris Testamenti pseudepigrapha 8. Leiden: Brill, 1985.Google Scholar

Horbury, William. “Jewish and Christian Monotheism in the Herodian Age.” In Early Jewish and Christian Monotheism, edited by Stuckenbruck, Loren T and North, Wendy E. S., 16–44. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 263. London: T&T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar

Huizenga, Leroy A. The New Isaac: Tradition and Intertextuality in the Gospel of Matthew. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 131. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Huizenga, Leroy A. “The Old Testament in the New, Intertextuality and Allegory.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 38 (2015): 17–35.Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W. How on Earth Did Jesus Become a God? Historical Questions about Earliest Devotion to Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2005.Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W. Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. 3rd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W. One God, One Lord: Early Christian Devotion and Ancient Jewish Monotheism. 3rd ed. London: T&T Clark, 2015.Google Scholar

Hurtado, Larry W. “What Do We Mean by ‘First-Century Jewish Monotheism’?” Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers 32 (1993): 348–68.Google Scholar

James, M. R. The Testament of Abraham. Texts and Studies 2.1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1892.Google Scholar

Jeffery, Arthur. “Daniel.” In The Interpreter’s Bible, vol. 6, edited by Buttrick, George A., 339–549. Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1956.Google Scholar

Jobes, Karen H. 1 Peter. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2005.Google Scholar

Jobes, Karen H. and Silva, Moisés. Invitation to the Septuagint. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2015.Google Scholar

Johnson, Luke Timothy. The Gospel of Luke. Sacra Pagina 3. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical, 1991.Google Scholar

Johnson, Luke Timothy. “Literary Criticism of Luke-Acts: Is Reception-History Pertinent?” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 28 (2005): 159–62.Google Scholar

Jones, Donald L. “The Title Christos in Luke-Acts.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 30 (1970): 69–76.Google Scholar

Just, Arthur A. Luke 1:1–9:50. Concordia Commentary. Saint Louis, MO: Concordia, 1996.Google Scholar

Justin, Martyr. Apologiae pro Christianis. Dialogus cum Tryphone. Edited by Marcovich, Miroslav. Patristische Texte und Studien 38. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2005.Google Scholar

Kee, H. C. “Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs: A New Translation and Introduction.” In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, vol. 1, edited by Charlesworth, James H., 775–828. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1983.Google Scholar

Keener, Craig S. Acts: An Exegetical Commentary. Vol. 1. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2012.Google Scholar

Kenyon, Frederick G., ed. The Chester Beatty Biblical Papyri: Descriptions and Texts of Twelve Manuscripts on Papyrus of the Greek Bible, Fasc. VII Ezekiel, Daniel, Esther. London: Emery Walker, 1937–38.Google Scholar

Kilgallen, John J. “Jesus’ First Trial: Messiah and Son of God (Luke 22,66–71).” Biblica 80 (1999): 401–14.Google Scholar

Kirk, J. R. Daniel. A Man Attested by God: The Human Jesus of the Synoptic Gospels. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2016.Google Scholar

Kistemaker, Simon J. Acts. New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1990.Google Scholar

Kugler, Robert A. From Patriarch to Priest: The Levi-Priestly Tradition from Aramaic Levi to Testament of Levi. Early Judaism and Its Literature 9. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Lacocque, André. The Book of Daniel. Translated by David Pellauer. Atlanta, GA: John Knox, 1979.Google Scholar

Ladd, George E. The Presence of the Future: The Eschatology of Biblical Realism. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974.Google Scholar

Laffey, Alice L. “Images of Mary in the Christian Scriptures.” In All Generations Shall Call Me Blessed, edited by Eigo, F. A., 39–71. Villanova, PA: Villanova University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Lagrange, M.-J. Évangile selon Saint Luc. 3rd ed. Etudes bibliques. Paris: Victor Lecoffre, 1927.Google Scholar

Lane, William L. The Gospel according to Mark. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974.Google Scholar

Lanier, Gregory R. “‘From God’ or ‘from Heaven’? ἐξ ὕψους in Luke 1,78.” Biblica 97 (2016): 121–27.Google Scholar

Larkin, William J. “Luke’s Use of the Old Testament in Luke 22–23.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Durham, 1974.Google Scholar

Laurentin, René. Jésus au Temple: Mystère de Pâques et foi de Marie en Luc 2,48–50. Paris: Gabalda, 1966.Google Scholar

Laurentin, René. Structure et theólogie de Luc I–II. Paris: Gabalda, 1957.Google Scholar

Law, T. M. “A History of Research on Origen’s Hexapla: From Masius to the Hexapla Project.” Bulletin of the International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies 40 (2007): 30–48.Google Scholar

Leaney, A. R. C. A Commentary on the Gospel according to St. Luke. 2nd ed. Black’s New Testament Commentaries. London: Black, 1971.Google Scholar

Lee, Aquila H. I. From Messiah to Preexistent Son: Jesus’ Self-Consciousness and Early Christian Exegesis of Messianic Psalms. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/192. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005.Google Scholar

Legrand, Lucien. “L’évangile aux bergers. Essai sur le genre littéraire de Lc 2, 8–20.” Revue biblique 75 (1968): 161–87.Google Scholar

Levey, Samson H. “The Date of Targum Jonathan to the Prophets.” Vetus Testamentum 21 (1971): 186–96.Google Scholar

Litwak, Kenneth D. Echoes of Scripture in Luke-Acts: Telling the Story of God’s People Intertextually. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 282. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar

Loisy, Alfred. L’évangile selon Luc. Paris: Minerva, 1924.Google Scholar

Loke, Andrew Ter Ern. The Origin of Divine Christology. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Louw, Johannes P. and Nida, Eugene A., eds. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains. 2 vols. 2nd ed. New York: United Bible Societies, 1989.Google Scholar

Lucas, Alec J. “Assessing Stanley E. Porter’s Objections to Richard B. Hays’s Notion of Metalepsis.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 76 (2014): 93–111.Google Scholar

Lucas, Ernest. Daniel. Apollos Old Testament Commentary 20. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2002.Google Scholar

Lunn, Nicholas P. “Allusions to the Joseph Narratives in the Synoptic Gospels and Acts: Foundations of a Biblical Type.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 55 (2012): 27–41.Google Scholar

Maher, Michael, ed. Targum Pseudo-Jonathan: Genesis. Translated, with Introduction and Notes. The Aramaic Bible 1b. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical, 1992.Google Scholar

Mann, Joshua L. “What Is Opened in Luke 24:45, the Mind or the Scriptures?” Journal of Biblical Literature 135 (2016): 799–806.Google Scholar

Marshall, I. Howard. “Acts and the ‘Former Treatise.’” In Ancient Literary Setting. Vol. 1 of The Book of Acts in Its First Century Setting, edited by Winter, Bruce W. and Clark, Andrew D., 163–82. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1993.Google Scholar

Marshall, I. Howard. The Gospel of Luke: A Commentary on the Greek Text. The New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Paternoster, 1978.Google Scholar

Marshall, I. Howard. “‘Israel’ and the Story of Salvation: One Theme in Two Parts.” In Jesus and the Heritage of Israel: Luke’s Narrative Claim upon Israel’s Legacy, edited by Moessner, David P., 340–57. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 1999.Google Scholar

Marshall, I. Howard. Luke: Historian and Theologian. 3rd ed. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1988.Google Scholar

Martin, Michael W. “Defending the ‘Western Non-Interpolations’: The Case for an Anti- Separationist Tendenz in the Longer Alexandrian Readings.” Journal of Biblical Literature 124 (2005): 269–94.Google Scholar

Martínez, Florentino García, and Tigchelaar, Eibert J. C., eds. The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill, 2000.Google Scholar

McConnell, James R., Jr. The Topos of Divine Testimony in Luke-Acts. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2014.Google Scholar

McCullough, David. 1776. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2005.Google Scholar

Meade, David G. Pseudonymity and Canon: An Investigation into the Relationship of Authorship and Authority in Jewish and Earliest Christian Tradition. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1986.Google Scholar

Meier, John P. A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus. 5 vols. ABRL. New York: Doubleday, 1991–2016.Google Scholar

Metzger, B. M. “The Fourth Book of Ezra: A New Translation and Introduction.” In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, vol. 1, edited by Charlesworth, James H., 517–59. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1983.Google Scholar

Meyer, Ben F. “But Mary Kept All These Things.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 26 (1964): 31–49.Google Scholar

Miller, Stephen R. Daniel. New American Commentary 18. Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman, 1994.Google Scholar

Milne, H. J. M. and Skeat, T. C.. The Codex Sinaiticus and the Codex Alexandrinus. London: British Museum, 1951.Google Scholar

Minear, Paul S. “Luke’s Use of the Birth Stories.” In Studies in Luke-Acts: Essays Presented in Honor of Paul Schubert, edited by Keck, Leander E. and Martyn, J. Louis, 111–30. Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1966.Google Scholar

Montgomery, James A. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Book of Daniel. International Critical Commentary. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1927.Google Scholar

Morgenstern, Matthew, Qimron, Elisha, and Sivan, Daniel. “The Hitherto Unpublished Columns of the Genesis Apocryphon.” Abr-Nahrain 33 (1995): 30–54.Google Scholar

Morris, Leon. The Gospel according to John. Rev. ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar

Morris, Leon. Luke: An Introduction and Commentary. Rev. ed. Tyndale New Testament Commentaries. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1988; reprint, 1990.Google Scholar

Myers, Jacob M. I and II Esdras. Anchor Bible 42. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1974.Google Scholar

Neirynck, Frans. L’évangile de noël selon S. Luc. Etudes religieuses 749. Brussels: La Pensée Catholique, 1960.Google Scholar

Neirynck, Frans. “‘Maria bewaarde al de woorden in haar hart.’ Lk. 2, 19. 51 in hun context verklaard.” Collationes Brugenses et Gandavenses 5 (1959): 433–66. Repr., Sylloge excerptorum e dissertationibus ad gradum Doctoris in Sacra Theologia vel in Iure canonico consequendum conscriptis, vol. 34, 5–38. Leuven: Universitas Catholica Lovaniensis, 1960.Google Scholar

Nestle, Eberhard, Nestle, Erwin, Aland, Barbara, et al., eds. Novum Testamentum Graece. 28th ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2012.Google Scholar

Newsom, Carol A., with Breed, Brennan W.. Daniel: A Commentary. Old Testament Library. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2014.Google Scholar

Neyrey, Jerome H. The Passion according to Luke: A Redaction Study of Luke’s Soteriology. New York: Paulist, 1985.Google Scholar

Nolland, John. Luke 1–9:20. Word Biblical Commentary 35a. Dallas, TX: Word, 1989.Google Scholar

Nolland, John. Luke 9:21–18:34. Word Biblical Commentary 35b. Dallas, TX: Word, 1993.Google Scholar

Nolland, John. Luke 18:35–24:53. Word Biblical Commentary 35c. Dallas, TX: Word, 1993.Google Scholar

Oliver, H. H. “The Lucan Birth Stories and the Purpose of Luke-Acts.” New Testament Studies 10 (1963–64): 202–26.Google Scholar

Orr, Peter C. Exalted Above the Heavens: The Risen and Ascended Christ. New Studies in Biblical Theology 47. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2018.Google Scholar

Osborne, Grant R. The Resurrection Narratives: A Redactional Study. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1984.Google Scholar

Pao, David W. Acts and the Isaianic New Exodus. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/130. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.Google Scholar

Pao, David W. and Schnabel, Eckhard J.. “Luke.” In Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament, edited by Beale, G. K. and Carson, D. A., 251–414. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2007.Google Scholar

Parker, D. C. Codex Sinaiticus: The Story of the World’s Oldest Bible. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2010.Google Scholar

Parry, Donald W. and Tov, Emanuel, eds. The Dead Sea Scrolls Reader. 6 vols. Leiden: Brill, 2004–05.Google Scholar

Parsons, Mikeal C. “A Christological Tendency in P⁷⁵.” Journal of Biblical Literature 105 (1986): 463–79.Google Scholar

Parsons, Mikeal C. The Departure of Jesus in Luke-Acts: The Ascension Narratives in Context. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 21. Sheffield: JSOT, 1987.Google Scholar

Parsons, Mikeal C. and Pervo, Richard I.. Rethinking the Unity of Luke and Acts. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1993.Google Scholar

Peppard, Michael. The Son of God in the Roman World: Divine Sonship in Its Social and Political Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Perkins, Pheme. Peter: Apostle for the Whole Church. Studies on the Personalities of the New Testament. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Perry, Tim. Mary for Evangelicals: Toward an Understanding of the Mother of Our Lord. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2006.Google Scholar

Pervo, Richard I. “Fourteen Years After: Revisiting Rethinking the Unity of Luke and Acts.” In Rethinking the Unity and Reception of Luke and Acts, edited by Gregory, Andrew F. and Rowe, C. Kavin, 23–40. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Péter-Contesse, René and Ellington, John. A Handbook on the Book of Daniel. New York: United Bible Societies, 1993.Google Scholar

Pierce, Ronald W. Daniel. Teach the Text Commentary Series. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2015.Google Scholar

Pietersma, Albert and Wright, Benjamin G., ed. A New English Translation of the Septuagint and the Other Greek Translations Traditionally Included under That Title. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Plummer, Alfred. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel according to S. Luke. 5th ed. International Critical Commentary. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1922.Google Scholar

Pokorný, Petr. Theologie der Lukanischen Schriften. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996.Google Scholar

Pope Clement, I, Frederick, G. Kenyon, H. J. M. Milne, , and Skeat, T. C., eds. The Codex Alexandrinus (Royal ms. 1 D v–viii) in Reduced Photographic Facsimile. Vol. 3. London: British Museum, 1936.Google Scholar

Porteous, Norman W. Daniel: A Commentary. Old Testament Library. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster, 1965.Google Scholar

Porter, Stanley E. “Allusions and Echoes.” In As It Is Written: Studying Paul’s Use of Scripture, edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Stanley, Christopher D., 29–40. Society of Biblical Literature Symposium Series 50. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar

Porter, Stanley E. “Further Comments on the Use of the Old Testament in the New Testament.” In The Intertextuality of the Epistles: Explorations of Theory and Practice, edited by Brodie, Thomas L., MacDonald, Dennis R., and Porter, Stanley E., 98–110. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2006.Google Scholar

Porter, Stanley E. “The Use of the Old Testament in the New Testament: A Brief Comment on Method and Terminology.” In Early Christian Interpretation of the Scriptures of Israel: Investigations and Proposals, edited by Evans, Craig A. and Sanders, James A., 79–96. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 148. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1997.Google Scholar

Powell, Mark Allen. Chasing the Eastern Star: Adventures in Biblical Reader-Response Criticism. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2001.Google Scholar

Rahlfs, Alfred and Hanhart, Robert, eds. Septuaginta: Editio altera. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2006.Google Scholar

Räisänen, Heikki. Die Mutter Jesu im Neuen Testament. Annales Academiae scientiarum fennicae 2/158. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, 1969.Google Scholar

Reid, Barbara E. “Prophetic Voices of Elizabeth, Mary, and Anna in Luke 1–2.” In New Perspectives on the Nativity, edited by Corley, Jeremy, 37–46. New York: T&T Clark, 2009.Google Scholar

Rese, Martin. Altestamentliche Motive in der Christologie des Lukas. Studien zum Neuen Testament 1. Gütersloh: Mohn, 1969.Google Scholar

Reynolds, Benjamin E., ed. The Son of Man Problem: Critical Readings. Critical Readings in Biblical Studies. London: T&T Clark, 2018.Google Scholar

Rowe, C. Kavin. “Acts 2.36 and the Continuity of Lukan Christology.” New Testament Studies 53 (2007): 37–56.Google Scholar

Rowe, C. Kavin. Early Narrative Christology: The Lord in the Gospel of Luke. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 139. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2006; reprint, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2009.Google Scholar

Rowe, C. Kavin. “History, Hermeneutics, and the Unity of Luke-Acts.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 28 (2005): 131–57.Google Scholar

Rowe, C. Kavin. “Literary Unity and Reception History: Reading Luke-Acts as Luke and Acts.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 29 (2007): 449–57.Google Scholar

Rowe, C. Kavin. “Luke and the Trinity: An Essay in Ecclesial Biblical Theology.” Scottish Journal of Theology 56 (2003): 1–26.Google Scholar

Rowe, C. Kavin. World Upside Down: Reading Acts in the Graeco-Roman Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Rusam, Dietrich. Das alte Testament bei Lukas. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 112. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2003.Google Scholar

Ryle, Herbert E. and James, Montague R., eds. ΨΑΛΜΟΙ ΣΟΛΟΜΩΝΤΟΣ: Psalms of the Pharisees, Commonly Called the Psalms of Solomon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1891.Google Scholar

Sahlin, Harald. Der Messias und das Gottesvolk: Studien zur protolukanischen Theologie. Acta seminarii neotestamentici upsaliensis 12. Uppsala: Almqvist, 1945.Google Scholar

Sanders, E. P. “Testament of Abraham: A New Translation and Introduction.” In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, vol. 1, edited by Charlesworth, James H., 871–902. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1983.Google Scholar

Schnabel, Eckhard J. Acts. Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament 5. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012.Google Scholar

Schneider, Gerhard. Das Evangelium nach Lukas Kapitel 1–10. 3rd ed. Ökumenischer Taschenbuch-Kommentar 3/1. Gütersloher: Mohn, 1992.Google Scholar

Schreiner, Thomas R. 1, 2 Peter, Jude. New American Commentary 37. Nashville, TN: Broadman & Holman, 2003.Google Scholar

Schubert, Paul. “The Structure and Significance of Luke 24.” In Neutestamentliche Studien für Rudolf Bultmann: zu seinem siebzigsten Geburtstag am 20. August 1954, edited by Eltester, Walther, 165–86. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 21. Berlin: Töpelmann, 1957.Google Scholar

Schürer, Emil, Vermes, Geza, and Millar, Fergus. The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ (175 B.C.–A.D. 135). Vol. 2. Rev. ed. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1978.Google Scholar

Schürmann, Heinz. Das Lukasevangelium, erster Teil: Kommentar zu Kap. 1, 1–9, 50. Herders theologischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 3. Freiburg: Herder, 1969.Google Scholar

Schürmann, Heinz. “Die Verheissung an Simon Petrus: Auslegung von Lk 5,1–11.” In Heinz Schürmann, Ursprung und Gestalt: Erörterungen und Besinnungen zum Neuen Testament, 268–73. Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1970.Google Scholar

Schweizer, Eduard. The Good News according to Luke. Translated by David E. Green. Atlanta, GA: John Knox, 1984.Google Scholar

Seim, Turid K. The Double Message: Patterns of Gender in Luke-Acts. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1994.Google Scholar

Serra, Aristide. Sapienza e Contemplazione di Maria secondo Luca 2, 19,51b. Scripta Pontificiae Facultatis Theologicae “Marianum” 36. Rome: Edizioni Marianum, 1982.Google Scholar

Shaw, David A. “Converted Imaginations? The Reception of Richard Hays’s Intertextual Method.” Currents in Biblical Research 11 (2013): 234–45.Google Scholar

Silva, Moisés, ed. New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology and Exegesis. 5 vols. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2014.Google Scholar

Smolar, Leivy and Aberbach, Moses. Studies in Targum Jonathan to the Prophets. The Library of Biblical Studies. New York: Ktav, 1983.Google Scholar

Songer, Harold S. “Luke’s Portrayal of the Origins of Jesus.” Review and Expositor 64 (1967): 453–63.Google Scholar

Spencer, Patrick E. “The Unity of Luke-Acts: A Four-Bolted Hermeneutical Hinge.” Currents in Biblical Research 5 (2007): 341–66.Google Scholar

Stein, Robert H. Luke. New American Commentary 24. Nashville, TN: B&H, 1992.Google Scholar

Stein, Robert H. Mark. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008.Google Scholar

Steiner, Richard C. “The Heading of the Book of the Words of Noah on a Fragment of the Genesis Apocryphon: New Light on a ‘Lost’ Work.” Dead Sea Discoveries 2 (1995): 66–71.Google Scholar

Stolz, F. “ ֵ לב.” In Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament, vol. 2, edited by Jenni, Ernst, 638–42. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1997.Google Scholar

Stone, Michael E. “The Book(s) Attributed to Noah.” Dead Sea Discoveries 13 (2006): 4–23.Google Scholar

Stone, Michael E. Fourth Ezra: A Commentary on the Book of Fourth Ezra. Hermeneia: A Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1990.Google Scholar

Stone, Michael E. The Testament of Abraham: The Greek Recensions. Society of Biblical Literature Texts and Translations 2; Pseudepigrapha Series 2. Missoula, MT: Society of Biblical Literature, 1972.Google Scholar

Strack, Hermann L. and Billerbeck, Paul. Kommentar zum neuen Testament aus Talmud und Midrasch. 6 vols. Munich: Beck, 1922–61.Google Scholar

Strauss, Mark L. The Davidic Messiah in Luke-Acts: The Promise and Its Fulfillment in Lukan Christology. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 110. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1995.Google Scholar

Sylva, Dennis D. “The Cryptic Clause en tois tou patros mou dei einai me in Lk 2:49b.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 78 (1987): 132–40.Google Scholar

Talbert, Charles H. Literary Patterns, Theological Themes, and the Genre of Luke-Acts. Society of Biblical Literature Monograph Series 20. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Talbert, Charles H. Reading Luke: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Third Gospel. Reading the New Testament Series. New York: Crossroad, 1982.Google Scholar

Tannehill, Robert C. The Narrative Unity of Luke-Acts: A Literary Interpretation. 2 vols. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1986–90.Google Scholar

Tatum, W. B. “The Epoch of Israel: Luke 1–2 and the Theological Plan of Luke-Acts.” New Testament Studies 13 (1967): 184–95.Google Scholar

Thompson, Michael. Clothed with Christ: The Example and Teaching of Jesus in Romans 12.1–15.13. Journal for the Study of the New Testament: Supplement Series 59. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1991.Google Scholar

Thrall, Margaret E. Greek Particles in the New Testament: Linguistic and Exegetical Studies. New Testament Tools and Studies 3. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1962.Google Scholar

Torrey, Charles C. “Χριστός.” In Quantulacumque: Studies Presented to Kirsopp Lake by Pupils, Colleagues and Friends, edited by Casey, Robert P., Lake, Silva, and Lake, Agnes K., 317–24. London: Christophers, 1937.Google Scholar

Tromp, Johannes. The Life of Adam and Eve in Greek. Pseudepigrapha Veteris Testamenti Graece 6. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar

Turner, Max. Power from on High: The Spirit in Israel’s Restoration and Witness in Luke-Acts. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1996.Google Scholar

Turner, Max. “The Spirit of Christ and Christology.” In Christ the Lord: Studies in Christology Presented to Donald Guthrie, edited by Rowdon, Harold H., 168–90. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1982.Google Scholar

Turner, Max. “The Spirit of Christ and ‘Divine’ Christology.” In Jesus of Nazareth: Lord and Christ, edited by Green, Joel B. and Turner, Max, 413–36. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1994.Google Scholar

van Unnik, Willem C. “Die rechte Bedeutung des Wortes treffen: Lukas 2,19.” In Verbum: Essays on Some Aspects of the Religious Function of Words. Dedicated to Dr. H. W. Obbink, Professor in the History of Religions and Egyptology, University of Utrecht, on November 14th, 1964, edited by van Baaren, Theodorus Petrus, 129–47. Studia theologica Rheno-Traiectina 6. Utrecht: Kemink, 1964.Google Scholar

Violet, Bruno. Die Apokalypsen des Esra und des Baruch in deutscher Gestalt. Griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller 32. Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1924.Google Scholar

Wagner, J. Ross. Heralds of the Good News: Isaiah and Paul in Concert in the Letter to the Romans. Leiden: Brill, 2003.Google Scholar

Wallace, Daniel B. Greek Grammar beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996.Google Scholar

Walters, Patricia. The Assumed Authorial Unity of Luke and Acts: A Reassessment of the Evidence. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Weinert, Francis D. “The Multiple Meanings of Luke 2:49 and Their Significance.” Biblical Theology Bulletin 13 (1983): 19–22.Google Scholar

Westcott, B. F. and Hort, F. J. A.. The New Testament in the Original Greek. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Macmillan, 1881; reprint, Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2003.Google Scholar

Wilson, Brittany E. “Pugnacious Precursors and the Bearer of Peace: Jael, Judith, and Mary in Luke 1:42.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 68 (2006): 436–56.Google Scholar

Winter, Paul. “Lukanische Miszellen.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 49 (1958): 65–77.Google Scholar

Witherington, Ben, III. The Acts of the Apostles: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar

Witherington, Ben, III. Women in the Earliest Churches. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Wolter, Michael. The Gospel according to Luke. Translated by Wayne Coppins and Christoph Heilig. 2 vols. Baylor-Mohr Siebeck Studies in Early Christianity. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2016–17.Google Scholar

Wrede, William. The Messianic Secret. Translated by J. C. G. Greig. London: James Clarke, 1971.Google Scholar

Wright, N. T. The Resurrection of the Son of God. Christian Origins and the Question of God 3. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2003.Google Scholar

Wright, R. B. “Psalms of Solomon: A New Translation and Introduction.” In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, vol. 2, edited by Charlesworth, James H., 639–70. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1985.Google Scholar

Ziegler, Joseph, ed. Ezechiel. Septuaginta: Vetus Testamentum Graecum Auctoritate Academiae Scientarum Gottingensis editum 16/1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1952.Google Scholar

Ziegler, Joseph, ed., Ieremias, Baruch, Threni, Epistula Ieremiae. Septuaginta: Vetus Testamentum Graecum Auctoritate Academiae Scientarum Gottingensis editum 15. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 1957.Google Scholar

Ziegler, Joseph, ed. Susanna, Daniel, Bel et Draco. Septuaginta: Vetus Testamentum Graecum Auctoritate Academiae Scientarum Gottingensis editum 16/2. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck &Ruprecht, 1954.Google Scholar

Ziegler, Joseph and Munnich, Olivier, eds. Susanna, Daniel, Bel et Draco. Septuaginta: Vetus Testamentum Graecum Auctoritate Academiae Scientarum Gottingensis editum. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999.Google Scholar

Zwiep, A. W. Christ, the Spirit and the Community of God. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/293. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010.Google Scholar

Zwiep, A. W. “The Text of the Ascension Narratives (Luke 24.50–3; Acts 1.1–2, 9–11).” New Testament Studies 42 (1996): 219–44.Google Scholar