Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T12:22:36.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Texts

Collecting and Analyzing Event Documents

from Part III - Collecting and Analysing Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2023

Hannah Hughes
Affiliation:
Aberystwyth University
Alice B. M. Vadrot
Affiliation:
Universität Wien, Austria
Get access

Summary

One way to study agreement-making and its actors, processes, sites, and how they shape global order is through texts produced along the way. In any given multilateral environmental negotiation, there are implementation reports, decisions, resolutions, statements, newsletters, and other technical reports that are often written in a language all of their own. They contain phrases that have a long history and may indicate more than they appear at face value. Choices of words, phrases, and qualifying language often tell part of the story of how governments and other delegates at conferences compromised and reached agreement. This chapter examines the importance of understanding documents at multilateral environmental negotiations in context and what they can and cannot tell you. First we explain why studying negotiations through the documentation is important. We then give a brief overview of the different types of documents you encounter at a COP or other negotiating session, then turn to the question of context, and show how social norms and institutional settings can influence the creation of texts, which in turn could influence research that relies on those texts. Finally, we utilize a case study to show how to consider context when using documents for research.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

1.Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse analysis: An introduction. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
A useful practical guide that provides overview of various types of discourse analysis.Google Scholar
2.Johnstone, B. (2017). Discourse analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
This book includes theoretical and practical advice on how to locate context, roles, and power in text.Google Scholar
3.Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice and using software. Sage.Google Scholar
This book provides a wide-ranging look at qualitative text analysis, including hermeneutics, various qualitative text analysis methods, and computer assistance. It provides practical advice throughout.Google Scholar
4.Grimmer, J., and Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21(3),267297.Google Scholar
For those considering using computer models to identify commonalities or patterns in large amounts of text, this is a helpful resource on the use of such techniques.Google Scholar

References

Allan, J. I. (2018). Seeking entry: Discursive hooks and NGOs in global climate politics. Global Policy, 9(4),560569.Google Scholar
Allan, J. I. (2020). The new climate activism: NGO authority and participation in global climate governance. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Barkemeyer, R. (2017). Climate policy: Uncovering ocean-related priorities. Nature Climate Change, 7(11),761762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baya-Laffite, J., Gray, I., De Pryck, K, et al. (2014). Absolute and relative visibility of countries in the UNFCCC negotiations, 1995–2013. http://climaps.eu/#!/map/absolute-and-relative-visibility-of-countries-in-the-unfccc-negotiations-1995-2013.Google Scholar
Baya-Laffite, N., and Cointet, J. P. (2016). Mapping topics in international climate negotiations: A computer-assisted semantic network approach. In Kaun, A. and Kubitschko, S., eds., Innovative methods in media and communication research. London: Palgrave-Macmillan, pp. 273291.Google Scholar
Benedick, R. (1998). Ozone diplomacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Betsill, M. M., and Corell, E., eds. (2008). NGO diplomacy: The influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Biniaz, S. (2016). Comma but differentiated responsibilities: Punctuation and 30 other ways negotiators have resolved issues in the international climate change regime. Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law, 6(1),37.Google Scholar
Blaxekjær, L. Ø., and Nielsen, T. D. (2015). Mapping the narrative positions of new political groups under the UNFCCC. Climate Policy, 15(6),751766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brun, A. (2016). Conference diplomacy: The making of the Paris Agreement. Politics and Governance, 4(3),115123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, P., and Stothard, M. (2015). “COP21: US adds weight to group pushing for strong climate deal.” Financial Times. www.ft.com/content/d690ddea-9ec2-11e5-b45d-4812f209f861.Google Scholar
Depledge, J. (2005). The organization of international negotiations: Constructing the climate change regime. London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Engfeldt, L-G. (2009). From Stockholm to Johannesburg and beyond. Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hadden, J., and Seybert, L. A. (2016). What’s in a norm: Mapping the norm definition process in the debate on sustainable development. Global Governance, 22(2),249268.Google Scholar
Hein, J., Guarin, A., Frommé, E., and Pauw, P. (2018). Deforestation and the Paris climate agreement: An assessment of REDD+ in the national climate action plans. Forest Policy and Economics, 90,711.Google Scholar
Jernnäs, M., and Linnér, B. O. (2019). A discursive cartography of nationally determined contributions to the Paris climate agreement. Global Environmental Change, 55,7383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamau, M., Chasek, P., and O’Connor, D. (2018). Transforming multilateral diplomacy: The inside story of the sustainable development goals. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, L. (2016). Bypassing the ‘ratification straitjacket’: Reviewing US legal participation in a climate agreement. Climate Policy, 16(8),10111028.Google Scholar
Klein, D., Carazo, M. P., Doelle, M. Bulmer, J. and Higham, A., eds. (2019). The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Analysis and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, F. (1996). The Biodiversity Convention: A negotiating history. London: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J., and Fiorino, D., eds. (2017). Conceptual innovation in global environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mills-Novoa, M., and Liverman, D. M. (2019). Nationally determined contributions: Material climate commitments and discursive positioning in the NDCs. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(5),e589.Google Scholar
Morgera, E., and Tsioumani, E. (2010). Yesterday, today, and tomorrow: Looking afresh at the Convention on Biological Diversity. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 21(1),340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, V., and Thérien, J. P. (2018). Global governance in practice. Global Policy, 9(2), 163172.Google Scholar
Prior, L. (2008). Repositioning documents in social research. Sociology, 42(5),821836.Google Scholar
Thew, H., Middlemiss, L., and Paavola, J. (2020). “Youth is not a political position”: Exploring justice claims-making in the UN Climate Change Negotiations. Global Environmental Change, 61,102036.Google Scholar
Thew, H., Middlemiss, L., and Paavola, J. (2021). Does youth participation increase the democratic legitimacy of UNFCCC-orchestrated global climate change governance? Environmental Politics, 30(6),873894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thew, H., Middlemiss, L., and Paavola, J. (2022). “You need a month’s holiday just to get over it!” Exploring young people’s lived experiences of the UN Climate Change Negotiations. Sustainability, 14 (7),4259.Google Scholar
Tørstad, V., and Sælen, H. (2018). Fairness in the climate negotiations: What explains variation in parties’ expressed conceptions? Climate Policy, 18(5),642654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venturini, T., Baya-Laffite, N., Cointet, J.-P. et al. (2014). Three maps and three misunderstandings: A digital mapping of climate diplomacy. Big Data & Society 1(2),119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×