Book contents
- Planet in Peril
- Reviews
- Planet in Peril
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Fictional Vignettes
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Existential Threats: The Four Most Pressing Dangers Facing Humankind
- Part II Strategies and Obstacles: The Solutions We Need, and What’s Preventing Them from Being Realized
- Part III Sensible Steps for Today’s World: Powerful Measures We Can Implement Right Away
- Part IV The Middle-Term Goal: New International Tools for the Late Twenty-First Century
- Part V The Long-Term Goal: Envisioning a Mature System of Global Governance for the Twenty-Second Century
- Endnotes
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2022
Book contents
- Planet in Peril
- Reviews
- Planet in Peril
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Fictional Vignettes
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Existential Threats: The Four Most Pressing Dangers Facing Humankind
- Part II Strategies and Obstacles: The Solutions We Need, and What’s Preventing Them from Being Realized
- Part III Sensible Steps for Today’s World: Powerful Measures We Can Implement Right Away
- Part IV The Middle-Term Goal: New International Tools for the Late Twenty-First Century
- Part V The Long-Term Goal: Envisioning a Mature System of Global Governance for the Twenty-Second Century
- Endnotes
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Planet in PerilHumanity's Four Greatest Challenges and How We Can Overcome Them, pp. 385 - 425Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Adams, Kirsten, and Kreiss, Daniel, Power in Ideas: A Case-Based Argument for Taking Ideas Seriously in Political Communication (Cambridge University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Adams, Sam, Banavar, Guruduth, and Campbell, Murray, “I-Athlon: toward a multidimensional Turing Test,” AI Magazine (Spring 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamthwaite, Anthony, Britain, France, and Europe, 1945–1975: The Elusive Alliance (Bloomsbury, 2020).Google Scholar
Addison, Paul, The Road to 1945: British Politics and the Second World War (Jonathan Cape, 1975).Google Scholar
Akkerman, Tjitske, Lange, Sarah de, and Rooduijn, Matthijs, eds., Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Into the Mainstream? (Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Alibek, Ken, and Handelman, Stephen, Biohazard: The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World – Told from the Inside by the Man Who Ran It (Delta, 1999).Google Scholar
Allhof, Fritz, Lin, Patrick, Moor, James H., Weckert, John, and Roco, Mihail C., eds., Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology (Wiley, 2007).Google Scholar
Altmire, Jason, Dead Center: How Political Polarization Divided America and What We Can Do About It (Sunbury, 2017).Google Scholar
Ambinder, Marc, The Brink: President Reagan and the Nuclear War Scare of 1983 (Simon & Schuster, 2018).Google Scholar
Ambrose, Matthew, The Control Agenda: A History of the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (Cornell University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Verso, 2016).Google Scholar
Anderson, Kevin, and Peters, Glen, “The trouble with negative emissions,” Science 354:6309 (October 14, 2016).Google Scholar
Anderson, Michael, and Anderson, Susan Leigh, eds., Machine Ethics (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Angel, Roger, “Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point (L1),” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103:46 (November 14, 2006).Google Scholar
Angus, Ian, and Butler, Simon, Too Many People? Population, Immigration, and the Environmental Crisis (Haymarket, 2011).Google Scholar
Art, Robert J., and Jervis, Robert, eds., International Politics: Enduring Concepts and Contemporary Issues (HarperCollins, 1996).Google Scholar
Asahina, Robert, Just Americans: How Japanese Americans Won a War at Home and Abroad (Gotham, 2006).Google Scholar
Ausubel, Jesse, “Renewable and nuclear heresies”, International Journal of Nuclear Governance, Economy, and Ecology, 1:3 (2007).Google Scholar
Baber, Walter, and Bartlett, Robert, Consensus and Global Environmental Governance: Deliberative Democracy in Nature’s Regime (MIT Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Bacevich, Andrew, ed., Ideas and American Foreign Policy: A Reader (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Baldwin, Geoff, Bayer, Travis, Dickinson, Robert, et al., Synthetic Biology: A Primer (Imperial College Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Balleisen, Edward, Bennear, Lori, Krawiec, Kimberly, and Wiener, Jonathan, eds., Policy Shock: Recalibrating Risk and Regulation after Oil Spills, Nuclear Accidents, and Financial Crises (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Banerjee, Abhijit, and Duflo, Esther, Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty (Public Affairs, 2012).Google Scholar
Barash, David, Approaches to Peace: A Reader in Peace Studies (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Baratta, Joseph, The Politics of World Federation: From World Federalism to Global Governance (Praeger, 2004).Google Scholar
Barinaga, Marcia, “Asilomar revisited: lessons for today?” Science 287:5458 (March 3, 2000).Google Scholar
Barker, Gillian, and Kitcher, Philip, Philosophy of Science: A New Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha, Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (Cornell University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Barnett, Victoria J., Bystanders: Conscience and Complicity During the Holocaust (Praeger, 2000).Google Scholar
Barnosky, Anthony, Hadly, Elizabeth A., Bascompte, Jordi, et al., “Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere,” Nature 486 (June 7, 2012).Google Scholar
Barr, Niall, Eisenhower’s Armies: The American-British Alliance During World War II (Pegasus, 2015).Google Scholar
Barratt, James, Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era (Thomas Dunne Books, 2013).Google Scholar
Baum, Rudy, “Nanotechnology: Drexler and Smalley make the case for and against ‘molecular assemblers,’” Chemical Engineering News 81:48 (December 1, 2003).Google Scholar
Baum, S., and Tonn, B., “Introduction: Confronting future catastrophic threats to humanity,’ Futures 72 (2015).Google Scholar
Baumgaertner, Emily, “As D.I.Y. gene editing gains popularity, ‘someone is going to get hurt,’” New York Times (May 14, 2018).Google Scholar
Bear, Mark, Connors, Barry W., and Paradiso, Michael A., Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain, 3rd ed. (Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2006).Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, trans. by Mark Ritter (Sage, 1986, 2013).Google Scholar
Bedau, Mark, and Humphreys, Paul, eds., Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science (MIT Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex, and Luck, Edward, The Responsibility to Protect: From Promise to Practice (Polity, 2018).Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex, and Dunne, Tim, eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Benedick, Richard, Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet (Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia, Barriers to Bioweapons: The Challenges of Expertise and Organization for Weapons Development (Cornell University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Berezow, Alex, and Campbell, Hank, Science Left Behind: Feel-Good Fallacies and the Rise of the Anti-Scientific Left (PublicAffairs, 2012).Google Scholar
Berg, Paul, “Summary statement of the Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA Molecules,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 72:6 (1975).Google Scholar
Berners-Lee, Mike, There Is No Planet B: A Handbook for the Make or Break Years (Cambridge University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Daniel, Buchmann, Johannes, and Dahmen, Erik, eds., Post-quantum Cryptography (Springer, 2009).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Michael, The Great Depression: Delayed Recovery and Economic Change in America, 1929–1939 (Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Berry, Wendell, Life Is a Miracle: An Essay Against Modern Superstition (Counterpoint, 2000).Google Scholar
Berube, David, Nano-Hype: The Truth Behind the Nanotechnology Buzz (Prometheus Books, 2006).Google Scholar
Bess, Michael, Realism, Utopia, and the Mushroom Cloud: Four Activist Intellectuals and Their Strategies for Peace (University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Bess, Michael, The Light-Green Society: Ecology and Technological Modernity in France, 1960–2000 (University of Chicago Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Bess, Michael, Our Grandchildren Redesigned: Life in the Bioengineered Society of the Near Future (Beacon, 2015).Google Scholar
Bettez, David, “Unfulfilled initiative: disarmament negotiations and the Hague Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907,” Royal United Services Institute for Defence Studies 133:3 (June 1988).Google Scholar
Bickerton, Chris, European Integration: From Nation-States to Member-States (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Blackwill, Robert, and Harris, Jennifer, War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft (Harvard University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Bland, Larry, ed., The Papers of George Catlett Marshall, vol. 5 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Blanton, Thomas, “The Cuban Missile Crisis: 40 years later,” Washingtonpost.com (October 16, 2002).Google Scholar
Blascovich, Jim, and Bailenson, Jeremy, Infinite Reality: The Hidden Blueprint of our Virtual Lives (Morrow, 2011).Google Scholar
Blustein, Paul, “Laid low: the IMF, the Euro Zone, and the first rescue of Greece,” CIGI Paper no. 61 (Center for International Governance Innovation, April 2015).Google Scholar
Bocquet, Dominique, Deubner, Christian, and Peel, Quentin, The Future of the Franco-German Relationship: Three Views (Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1997).Google Scholar
Boellstorff, Tom, Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human (Princeton, 2008).Google Scholar
Bohman, James, and Rehg, William, eds., Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (MIT Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Bokat-Lindell, Spencer, “Is the coronavirus killing the World Health Organization?” New York Times (July 7, 2020).Google Scholar
Bonzo, Matthew, and Stevens, Michael, Wendell Berry and the Cultivation of Life (Brazos Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Bornstein, David, The Price of a Dream: The Story of the Grameen Bank (University of Chicago Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Bosco, David, Rough Justice: The International Criminal Court in a World of Power Politics (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Bostrom, Nick, Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Bostrom, Nick, Dafoe, Allan, and Flynn, Carrick, “Policy desiderata in the development of machine superintelligence,” Future of Humanity Institute Working Paper (Oxford University, 2016).Google Scholar
Bostrom, Nick, and Cirkovic, Milan, eds., Global Catastrophic Risks (Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudette, Neal, and Davenport, Coral, “G.M. announcement shakes up U.S. automakers’ transition to electric cars,” New York Times (January 29, 2021).Google Scholar
Bozo, Frédéric, Rodder, Andreas, and Sarotte, Mary Elise, eds., German Reunification: A Multinational History (Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Brand, Stewart, Whole Earth Discipline: Why Dense Cities, Nuclear Power, Transgenic Crops, Restored Wildlands, and Geoengineering Are Necessary (Penguin, 2009).Google Scholar
Bregman, Rutger, Humankind: A Hopeful History, trans. by Elizabeth Manton and Erica Moore (Little, Brown, 2020).Google Scholar
Breining, Greg, Super Volcano: The Ticking Time Bomb Beneath Yellowstone National Park (Voyageur, 2007).Google Scholar
Breyer, Christian, Fasihi, Mahdi, and Aghahosseini, Arman, “Carbon dioxide direct air capture for effective climate change mitigation based on renewable electricity: a new type of energy system sector coupling,” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 25:1 (2020).Google Scholar
Brissaud, Jean-Marc, Éléments pour une nouvelle politique étrangère (Front National, Université d’Été, September 1985).Google Scholar
Brixey-Williams, Sebastian, “Prospects for game-changers in submarine-detection technology,” The Strategist (Australian Strategic Policy Institute, August 22, 2020).Google Scholar
Brown, Archie, Seven Years That Changed the World: Perestroika in Perspective (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Brown, James, Ending Our Uncivil War: A Path to Political Recovery and Spiritual Renewal (Agape, 2017).Google Scholar
Brown, Jeremy, and Johnson, Matthew, Maoism at the Grassroots: Everyday Life in China’s Era of High Socialism (Harvard University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher, Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (Harper, 2017).Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, Erik, and McAfee, Andrew, The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (Norton, 2016).Google Scholar
Buchanan, Ben, The Hacker and the State: Cyber Attacks and the New Normal of Geopolitics (Harvard University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Buck, Holly, After Geoengineering: Climate Tragedy, Repair, and Restoration (Verso, 2019).Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 4th ed. (Red Globe, 2012).Google Scholar
Burke, Marshall, Davis, W. Matthew, and Diffenbaugh, Noah S., “Large potential reduction in economic damages under UN mitigation targets” Nature 557 (May 23, 2018).Google Scholar
Burnette, Ryan, ed., Biosecurity: Understanding, Assessing, and Preventing the Threat (Wiley, 2013).Google Scholar
Buss, David, Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind, 5th ed. (Psychology Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Callon, Michel, Lascoumes, Pierre, and Barthe, Yannick, Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy, trans. by Graham Burchell (MIT Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Camosy, Charles, Beyond the Abortion Wars: A Way Forward for a New Generation (Eerdmans, 2015).Google Scholar
Carlson, Robert, Biology Is Technology: The Promise, Peril, and New Business of Engineering Life (Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel, and Moss, David, Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit it (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Carroll, Dennis, Watson, Brooke, Togami, Eri, et al., “The Global Virome Project,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization (March 5, 2018).Google Scholar
Carson, Clayborne, “African Americans at war,” in Dear, I.C.B. and Foot, M.R.D., eds., The Oxford Companion to World War II (Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Carter, April, Peace Movements: International Protest and World Politics Since 1945 (Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Carter, Sarah, Rodemeyer, Michael, Garfinkel, Michele, and Friedman, Robert, Synthetic Biology and the U.S. Biotechnology Regulatory System: Challenges and Options (J. Craig Venter Institute, May 2014).Google Scholar
Castaneda, Andres, et al., “Global poverty update from the World Bank: New annual poverty estimates using the revised 2011 PPPs,” World Bank Blogs (September 2020), at: https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/september-2020-global-poverty-update-world-bank-new-annual-poverty-estimates-using-revised.Google Scholar
Castronova, Edward, Synthetic Worlds: The Business and Culture of Online Games (University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Castronova, Edward, Exodus to the Virtual World: How Online Fun Is Changing Reality (Palgrave, 2007).Google Scholar
Chace, Callum, Surviving AI: The Promise and Peril of Artificial Intelligence (Three C’s Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Chalmers, David, “The singularity: a philosophical analysis,” Journal of Consciousness Studies 17, 7–65 (2010).Google Scholar
Cheney, Catherine, “CEPI, a year in: how can we get ready for the next pandemic?” Devex (February 5, 2018).Google Scholar
Cherny, Andrei, The Candy Bombers: The Untold Story of the Berlin Airlift and America’s Finest Hour (Dutton Caliber, 2009).Google Scholar
Chertoff, Michael, Homeland Security: Assessing the First Five Years (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Christian, Brian, The Alignment Problem: Machine Learning and Human Values (Norton, 2020).Google Scholar
Chollet, François, “The implausibility of intelligence explosion,” Medium/Artificial Intelligence (November 27, 2017).Google Scholar
Christakis, Nicholas, Blueprint: The Evolutionary Origins of a Good Society (Little, Brown Spark, 2019).Google Scholar
Church, George, A Synthetic Biohazard Non-Proliferation Proposal (Harvard University, 2004); https://arep.med.harvard.edu/SBP/Church_Biohazard04c.htm.Google Scholar
Church, George, and Regis, Ed, Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves (Basic Books, 2012).Google Scholar
Clack, Christopher, Qvist, Staffan A., Apt, Jay, et al., “Evaluation of a proposal for reliable low-cost grid power with 100% wind, water, solar,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114:26 (June 27, 2017).Google Scholar
Clark, Bryan, The Emerging Era in Undersea Warfare (Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2015).Google Scholar
Clark, Grenville, and Sohn, Louis, World Peace Through World Law: Two Alternative Plans, 3rd ed. (Harvard University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold, Goodwin, Matthew, and Whiteley, Paul, Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip, and Davies, Paul, The Re-emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Clifford, Catherine, “This favorite saying of Mark Zuckerberg reveals the way the Facebook billionaire thinks about life,” CNBC.com (November 30, 2017).Google Scholar
Cohen, Benjamin, The Future of Global Currency: The Euro versus the Dollar (Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Coldewey, Devin, “OpenAI shifts from nonprofit to ‘capped-profit’ to attract capital,” Techcrunch (March 11, 2019).Google Scholar
Cole, David, Engines of Liberty: The Power of Citizen Activists to Make Constitutional Law (Basic Books, 2016).Google Scholar
Collier, Ellen, Bipartisanship and the Making of Foreign Policy: A Historical Survey (XLibris, 2011).Google Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Betts, Alexander, Refuge: Rethinking Refugee Policy in a Changing World (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Collina, Tom, “Russia, U.S. working on joint launch notification,” Arms Control Association (July 2, 2010).Google Scholar
Conant, James, Harvard to Hiroshima and the Making of the Nuclear Age (Stanford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Conniff, Richard, “The last resort: can we remove enough CO2 from the atmosphere to slow or even reverse climate change?” Scientific American 320:1 (January 2019).Google Scholar
Cook, John, Cranky Uncle vs. Climate Change: How to Understand and Respond to Climate Science Deniers (Citadel, 2020).Google Scholar
Cooley, Alexander, and Nexon, Daniel, Exit from Hegemony: The Unraveling of the American Global Order (Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Cooper, Robin, and Finley, Laura, Peace and Conflict Studies Research: A Qualitative Perspective (Information Age, 2014).Google Scholar
Cortright, David, Peace: A History of Movements and Ideas (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Cotton, Matthew, Ethics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach (Springer, 2014).Google Scholar
Cover, J.A., Pincock, Christopher, and Curd, Martin, Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues (Norton, 2012).Google Scholar
Craig, Robin, and Ruhl, J.B., “Designing administrative law for adaptive management,” Vanderbilt Law Review 67:1 (2014).Google Scholar
Cravens, Gwyneth, Power to Save the World: The Truth About Nuclear Energy (Vintage, 2007).Google Scholar
Cronon, William, ed., Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature (Norton, 1996).Google Scholar
Crowther, T. W., Glick, H. B., Bradford, M. A., et al., “Mapping tree density at a global scale,” Nature 525 (September 10, 2015).Google Scholar
Cyranoski, David, “The CRISPR-baby scandal: what’s next for human gene-editing,” Nature 566 (February 26, 2019).Google Scholar
Damasio, António, The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness (Harcourt, 1999).Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian, Melander, Erik, and Regan, Patrick, The Peace Continuum: What It Is and How to Study It (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Davies, Sara, Kamradt-Scott, Adam, and Rushton, Simon, Disease Diplomacy: International Norms and Global Health Security (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Davis, Ernest, “Ethical guidelines for a superintelligence,” Artificial Intelligence 220 (2015).Google Scholar
Davis, Zachary, ed., The India–Pakistan Military Standoff: Crisis and Escalation in South Asia (Palgrave MacMillan, 2011).Google Scholar
De Búrca, Gráinne, “Reappraising subsidiarity’s significance after Amsterdam,” Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper 7/99 (Harvard Law School, 1999).Google Scholar
Defense Science Board Task Force, “Department of Defense Biological Safety and Security Program” (Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, 2009).Google Scholar
Diamandis, Peter, and Kotler, Steven, Abundance: The Future is Better Than You Think (Free Press, 2012).Google Scholar
DiGiovanna, Sean, and Markusen, Ann, From Defense to Development? International Perspectives on Realizing the Peace Dividend (Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar
Dinan, Desmond, Origins and Evolution of the European Union, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Dinan, Desmond, Nugent, Neill, and Paterson, William, eds., The European Union in Crisis (Palgrave, 2016).Google Scholar
Dobbs, Michael, One Minute to Midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev, and Castro on the Brink of Nuclear War (Vintage, 2009).Google Scholar
Dolan, Kerry, “Forbes’ 35th Annual World’s Billionaires List: facts and figures 2021,” Forbes (April 6, 2021), at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/kerryadolan/2021/04/06/forbes-35th-annual-worlds-billionaires-list-facts-and-figures-2021/?sh=1f2837845e58.Google Scholar
Dollar, David, Huang, Yiping, and Yao, Yang, eds., China 2049: Economic Challenges of a Rising Global Power (Brookings Institution Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Domingos, Pedro, “AI will serve our species, not control it,” Scientific American 319:3 (September 2018).Google Scholar
Doudna, Jennifer, and Sternberg, Samuel, A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution (Mariner, 2018).Google Scholar
Downing, Taylor, 1983: Reagan, Andropov, and a World on the Brink (Da Capo Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Doyle, James, Nuclear Safeguards, Security, and Nonproliferation: Achieving Security with Technology and Policy (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2008).Google Scholar
Drexler, K. Eric, Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology (Anchor Doubleday, 1986).Google Scholar
Drexler, K. Eric, Radical Abundance: How a Revolution in Nanotechnology Will Change Civilization (Public Affairs, 2013).Google Scholar
Dryzek, John, Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Dryzek, John, Norgaard, Richard, and Schlosberg, David, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society (Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duane, Tim, Koomey, Jonathan, Belyeu, Kathy, and Hausker, Karl, From Risk to Return: Investing in a Clean Energy Economy (Risky Business Project, 2016).Google Scholar
Duchene, Francois, Jean Monnet: The First Statesman of Interdependence (Norton, 1980).Google Scholar
Dudley, Dominic, “China is set to become the world’s renewable energy superpower, according to new report,” Forbes (January 11, 2019).Google Scholar
Duedahl, Poul, ed., A History of UNESCO: Global Actions and Impacts (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).Google Scholar
Dunworth, Treasa, and Hood, Anna, eds., Disarmament Law: Reviving the Field (Routledge, 2020).Google Scholar
Dupuy, Jean-Pierre, On the Origins of Cognitive Science: The Mechanization of the Mind, trans. by M. B. DeBevoise (MIT, 2009).Google Scholar
Early, Bryan, Busted Sanctions: Explaining Why Economic Sanctions Fail (Stanford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Eden, Amnon, Moor, James, Soraker, Johnny, and Steinhart, Eric, eds., Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment (Springer, 2012).Google Scholar
Edwards, Mickey, The Parties versus the People: How to Turn Republicans and Democrats into Americans (Yale University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Ehlert, Dana, and Zickfeld, Kirsten, “Irreversible ocean thermal expansion under carbon dioxide removal,” Earth System Dynamics 9 (2018).Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry, Mehl, Arnaud, and Chitu, Livia, How Global Currencies Work: Past, Present, and Future (Princeton University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert, The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations (Blackwell, 2000).Google Scholar
Englander, John, Moving to Higher Ground: Rising Sea Level and the Path Forward (Science Bookshelf, 2021).Google Scholar
Enthoven, Alain, and Smith, Wayne, How Much is Enough? Shaping the Defense Program, 1961–1969 (Harper & Row, 1971).Google Scholar
Erlanger, Steven, “Europe lauds Biden but wonders: what will he want? How long will he stay?” New York Times (January 7, 2021).Google Scholar
ETC Group, Extreme Genetic Engineering: An Introduction to Synthetic Biology (ETC Group, January 2007).Google Scholar
Executive Office of the President, Office of Science and Technology Policy, “Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology,” 51 FR 23302 (Executive Office of the President, June 26, 1986).Google Scholar
Falk, Richard, and Strauss, Andrew, A Global Parliament: Essays and Articles (Committee for a Democratic UN, 2011).Google Scholar
Falk, Richard, Kim, Samuel, and Mendlovitz, Saul, eds., Toward a Just World Order (Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar
Farquharson, John E., and Holt, Stephen C., Europe from Below: An Assessment of Franco-German Popular Contacts (Allen & Unwin, 1975).Google Scholar
Felt, Ulrike, Fouché, Rayvon, Miller, Clark, and Smith-Doerr, Laurel, eds., The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 4th ed. (MIT, 2017).Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles, Nuclear Energy: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, Elena, Loescher, Gil, Long, Katy, and Sigona, Nando, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Fidler, David, “The World Health Organization and politics,” Think Global Health (April 10, 2020).Google Scholar
Field, Geoffrey, Blood, Sweat, and Toil: Remaking the British Working Class, 1939–1945 (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Fish, M. Steven, Democracy Derailed in Russia: The Failure of Open Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Fisher, Roger, Ury, William, and Patton, Bruce, Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (Penguin, 2011).Google Scholar
Fishkin, James, Democracy When the People Are Thinking: Revitalizing Our Politics Through Public Deliberation (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
FitzGerald, David, Refuge Beyond Reach: How Rich Democracies Repel Asylum Seekers (Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
FitzGerald, Frances, Way Out There in the Blue: Reagan, Star Wars and the End of the Cold War (Simon & Schuster, 2000).Google Scholar
Flam, Faye, “Americans are a little too relaxed about nukes,” Bloomberg Opinion (August 30, 2017).Google Scholar
Flynn, Michael E., “The international and domestic sources of bipartisanship in U.S. foreign policy,” Political Research Quarterly 67:2 (February 2014).Google Scholar
Ford, Martin, Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future (Basic, 2016).Google Scholar
Ford, Martin, Architects of Intelligence: The Truth about AI from the People Building It (Packt Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar
Foster, Lynn, Nanotechnology: Science, Innovation, and Opportunity (Prentice Hall, 2006).Google Scholar
Fountain, Henry, “Compact nuclear fusion reactor is ‘very likely to work,’ studies suggest,” New York Times (September 29, 2020).Google Scholar
Fox, Douglas, “The carbon rocks of Oman: could an unusual outcropping of Earth’s interior solve the world’s climate problem?” Scientific American 325:1 (July 2021).Google Scholar
Franco, Alessandro, and Diaz, Ana, “The future challenges for ‘clean coal technologies’: joining efficiency increase and pollutant emission control,” Energy 34:3 (March 2009).Google Scholar
Franklin, Alexi, “An international cyber warfare treaty: historical analogies and future prospects,” Journal of Law and Cyber Warfare 7:1 (Fall 2018).Google Scholar
Frankman, Myron, World Democratic Federalism: Peace and Justice Indivisible (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004).Google Scholar
Fraser, Derek, The Evolution of the British Welfare State, 5th ed. (Red Globe Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Frederickson, Donald, “Asilomar and recombinant DNA: the end of the beginning,” in Hanna, Kathi, ed., Biomedical Politics (National Academy Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Frederickson, Donald, “The first twenty-five years after Asilomar,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 44:2 (Spring, 2001).Google Scholar
Frederking, Brian, and Diehl, Paul, eds., The Politics of Global Governance: International Organizations in an Interdependent World, 5th ed. (Rienner, 2015).Google Scholar
Freitas, Robert, “Some limits to global ecophagy by biovorous nanoreplicators, with public policy recommendations,” Foresight Institute (April 2000).Google Scholar
Fried, Charles, and Fried, Gregory, Because It Is Wrong: Torture, Privacy, and Presidential Power in the Age of Terror (Norton, 2010).Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry, and Walter, Stefanie, “Understanding the political economy of the Eurozone crisis,” Annual Review of Political Science 20 (2017).Google Scholar
Friend, John, and Thayer, Bradley, How China Sees the World: Han-Centrism and the Balance of Power in International Politics (Potomac Books, 2018).Google Scholar
Fry, Douglas, Beyond War: The Human Potential for Peace (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis, Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution (Farrar Straus Giroux, 2002).Google Scholar
Fuss, Sabine, Canadell, Josep G., Peters, Glen P., et al., “Betting on negative emissions,” Nature Climate Change 4 (October 2014).Google Scholar
Galtung, Johan, Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization (Sage, 1996).Google Scholar
Grachev, Andrei, Gorbachev’s Gamble: Soviet Foreign Policy and the End of the Cold War (Polity, 2008).Google Scholar
Garcia, Denise, Disarmament Diplomacy and Human Security: Regimes, Norms and Moral Progress in International Relations (Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Michele, Endy, Drew, Epstein, Gerald, and Friedman, Robert, Synthetic Genomics: Options for Governance (J. Craig Venter Institute/CSIS/MIT, 2007).Google Scholar
Garrett, Laurie, The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out of Balance (Penguin, 1994).Google Scholar
Gates, Bill, How to Avoid a Climate Disaster: The Solutions We Have and the Breakthroughs We Need (Knopf, 2021).Google Scholar
Gauchat, Gordon, “Politicization of science in the public sphere: a study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010,” American Sociological Review 77:2 (April 2012).Google Scholar
Gaulin, Steven, and McBurney, Donald, Evolutionary Psychology, 2nd ed. (Pearson, 2004).Google Scholar
Geisinger, Alex, “A belief change theory of expressive law,” Iowa Law Review 35 (2002–2003).Google Scholar
Gelman, Vladimir, Authoritarian Russia: Analyzing Post-Soviet Regime Changes (University of Pittsburgh Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Gerstein, Daniel, National Security and Arms Control in the Age of Biotechnology (Rowman and Littlefield, 2013).Google Scholar
Gerzon, Mark, The Reunited States of America: How We Can Bridge the Partisan Divide (Berrett-Koehler, 2016).Google Scholar
Gessen, Masha, The Man Without a Face: The Unlikely Rise of Vladimir Putin (Riverhead, 2013).Google Scholar
Gibney, Elizabeth, “Self-taught AI is best yet at strategy game Go,” Nature (October 18, 2017).Google Scholar
Gilligan, Jonathan, “Flexibility, clarity, and legitimacy: considerations for managing nanotechnology risks,” Environmental Law Reporter 36:12 (2006).Google Scholar
Giridharadas, Anand, Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World (Vintage, 2019).Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Nils, Bjerkholt, Olav, Smith, Ron, and Dunne, Paul, eds., The Peace Dividend (Emerald, 1996).Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter, Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (University of Chicago Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Goldstein, E. Bruce, Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research, and Everyday Experience, 3rd ed. (Wadsworth, 2011).Google Scholar
Gonzalez, Robbie, “The potential pitfalls of sucking carbon from the atmosphere,” Wired (June 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Goodell, Jeff, How to Cool the Planet: Geoengineering and the Audacious Quest to Fix Earth’s Climate (Mariner, 2010).Google Scholar
Goodfellow, Ian, Bengio, Yoshua, and Courville, Aaron, Deep Learning (MIT Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert, The Oxford Handbook of Political Science (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Gottweis, Herbert, Governing Molecules: The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and the United States (MIT, 1998).Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Philip, We Wish to Inform You That Tomorrow We Will Be Killed with Our Families: Stories From Rwanda (Picador, 1999).Google Scholar
Grace, Katja, “The Asilomar Conference: a case study in risk mitigation,” Technical Report 2015–9 (Machine Intelligence Research Institute, 2015).Google Scholar
Grachev, Andrei, Gorbachev’s Gamble: Soviet Foreign Policy and the End of the Cold War (Polity, 2008).Google Scholar
Green, Jessica, Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance (Princeton University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Gronvall, Gigi, Synthetic Biology: Safety, Security, and Promise (Health Security Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Grunwald, Michael, “The trouble with the Green New Deal,” Politico (January 15, 2019).Google Scholar
Grush, Loren, “SXSW 2015: I reprogrammed a lifeform in someone’s kitchen while drinking a beer,” Popular Science (March 14, 2015).Google Scholar
Grushkin, Daniel, Kuiken, Todd, and Millet, Piers, Seven Myths and Realities about Do-It-Yourself Biology (Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Synthetic Biology Project, November 2013).Google Scholar
Guillemin, Jeanne, Biological Weapons: From the Invention of State-Sponsored Programs to Contemporary Bioterrorism (Columbia University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Gunkel, David, The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics (MIT, 2012).Google Scholar
Guston, David, and Sarewitz, Daniel, “Real-time technology assessment,” Technology in Society 24:1–2 (January 2002).Google Scholar
Guston, David, and Sarewitz, Daniel, eds., Shaping Science and Technology Policy: The Next Generation of Research (University of Wisconsin Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B., The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950–1957 (University of Notre Dame Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Haas, Peter, Morality After Auschwitz: The Radical Challenge of the Nazi Ethic (Fortress Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Haass, Richard, A World in Disarray: American Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order (Penguin, 2017).Google Scholar
Haftendorn, Helga, Coming of Age: German Foreign Policy Since 1945 (Rowman & Littlefield, 2006).Google Scholar
Happold, Matthew, and Eden, Paul, eds., Economic Sanctions and International Law (Hart, 2019).Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom (Basic Books, 2006).Google Scholar
Hamer, Christopher, A Global Parliament: Principles of World Federation (Self-published, 1998).Google Scholar
Hancock, M. Donald, Carman, Christopher J., Castle, Marjorie, et al., Politics in Europe, 6th ed. (CQ Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Hanna, Ryan, et al., “Emergency deployment of direct air capture as a response to the climate crisis,” Nature Communications 12:368 (2021).Google Scholar
Hansen, James, Storms of My Grandchildren: The Truth About the Coming Climate Catastrophe and Our Last Chance to Save Humanity (Bloomsbury, 2009).Google Scholar
Hanson, Robin, The Age of Em: Work, Love, and Life When Robots Rule the Earth (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Hanson, Robin, and Yudkowsky, Eliezer, “The AI-Foom debate” (Machine Intelligence Research Institute, 2013).Google Scholar
Hao, Karen, “These awful AI song lyrics show us how hard language is for machines,” Technology Review (November 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Harahan, Joseph P., On-Site Inspections under the INF Treaty (US Department of Defense, 1993).Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra, Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research (University of Chicago Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Harland, Paul, Staats, Henk, and Wilke, Henk, “Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 29:4 (2007).Google Scholar
Harris, Sam, The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values (Free Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas, Objectivity Is Not Neutrality: Explanatory Schemes in History (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Haslam, Nick, Smillie, Luke, and Song, John, An Introduction to Personality, Individual Differences, and Intelligence, 2nd ed. (Sage, 2017).Google Scholar
Hass, Ryan, Stronger: Adapting America’s China Strategy in an Age of Competitive Interdependence (Yale University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona, and Shapiro, Scott, The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World (Simon & Schuster, 2017).Google Scholar
Hauss, Charles, Security 2.0: Dealing with Wicked Global Problems (Rowman & Littlefield, 2015).Google Scholar
Hawken, Paul, ed., Drawdown: The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Proposed to Reverse Global Warming (Penguin, 2017).Google Scholar
Hawking, Stephen, Russell, Stuart, Tegmark, Max, and Wilczek, Frank, “Stephen Hawking: ‘Transcendence’ looks at the implications of artificial intelligence – but are we taking AI seriously enough?” The Independent (May 1, 2014).Google Scholar
Hawkins, Stephen, et al., “Hidden tribes: a study of America’s polarized landscape,” More in Common (2018).Google Scholar
Hayhoe, Katharine, Saving Us: A Climate Scientist’s Case for Hope and Healing in a Divided World (One Signal Publishers/Atria, 2021).Google Scholar
Hedgpeth, Dana, “Congress says DHS oversaw $15 billion in failed contracts,” Washington Post (September 17, 2008).Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F., The Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. by Terry Pinkard (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Heinberg, Richard, and Fridley, David, “The end of cheap coal,” Nature 468:7322 (2010).Google Scholar
Held, David, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Stanford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Hélias, Pierre-Jakez, The Horse of Pride: Life in a Breton Village, trans. by June Guicharnaud (Yale University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Hennigan, W.J., “Donald Trump is playing a dangerous game of nuclear poker,” Time (February 1, 2018).Google Scholar
Hern, Alex, “Experts including Elon Musk call for research to avoid AI pitfalls,” The Guardian (January 12, 2015).Google Scholar
Hershberg, J.G., James B. Conant: Harvard to Hiroshima and the Making of the Nuclear Age (Stanford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Hesterman, Jennifer, The Terrorist-Criminal Nexus: An Alliance of International Drug Cartels, Organized Crime, and Terror Groups (CRC Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc, and Rudolph, Thomas, Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis (University of Chicago Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Heydon, Kenneth, and Woolcock, Stephen, eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to International Trade Policy (Ashgate, 2012).Google Scholar
Hilaire, Jerome, Minx, Jan C., Callaghan, Max W. et al., “Negative emissions and international climate goals – learning from and about mitigation scenarios,” Climatic Change 157 (2019).Google Scholar
Hilberg, Raul, Perpetrators, Victims, Bystanders: The Jewish Catastrophe, 1933–1945 (HarperCollins, 1992).Google Scholar
Hilley, John, The Challenge of Legislation: Bipartisanship in a Partisan World (Brookings, 2007).Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric, The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914–1991 (Vintage, 1996).Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric, Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Hodge, Graeme, Bowman, Diana, and Maynard, Andrew, eds., International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies (Edward Elgar, 2010).Google Scholar
Hodsden, Suzanne, “Breathalyzer diagnoses 17 different diseases using a single breath,” Med Device Online (January 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, David, The Dead Hand: The Untold Story of the Cold War Arms Race and Its Dangerous Legacy (Anchor, 2010).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Matthew, Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley, Duties Beyond Borders: On the Limits and Possibilities of Ethical International Relations (Syracuse University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Hogan, Michael, A Cross of Iron: Harry S. Truman and the Origins of the National Security State, 1945–1954 (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Holtzman, David, Privacy Lost: How Technology Is Endangering Your Privacy (Jossey-Bass, 2006).Google Scholar
Hope, Bradley, and Friedman, Nicole, “Climate change is forcing the insurance industry to recalculate,” Wall Street Journal (October 28, 2018).Google Scholar
Hopkin, Jonathan, “When Polanyi met Farage: market fundamentalism, economic nationalism, and Britain’s exit from the European Union,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19:3 (June 2017).Google Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel, and Sides, John, eds., Political Polarization in American Politics (Bloomsbury, 2015).Google Scholar
Hore-Lacy, Ian, Nuclear Energy in the 21st Century, 4th ed. (World Nuclear Association, 2018).Google Scholar
Horgan, John, “Bethe, Teller, Trinity, and the end of the Earth,” Scientific American online (August 4, 2015).Google Scholar
Horvath, Robert, The Legacy of Soviet Dissent: Dissidents, Democratization, and Radical Nationalism in Russia (Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Hueglin, Thomas, and Fenna, Alan, Comparative Federalism: A Systematic Inquiry, 2nd ed. (University of Toronto Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary, Schott, Jeffrey J., Elliott, Kimberly Ann, and Oegg, Barbara, Economic Sanctions Reconsidered, 3rd ed. (Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2009).Google Scholar
Hughes, Terry, Kerry, James T., Baird, Andrew H. et al., “Global warming transforms coral reef assemblages,” Nature 556 (April 18, 2018).Google Scholar
Hulme, Mike, Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Humphreys, Paul , ed., The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Husain, Amir, The Sentient Machine: The Coming Age of Artificial Intelligence (Scriber, 2017).Google Scholar
Huston, Scott, “GPT-3 primer: understanding OpenAI’s cutting-edge language model,” Towards Data Science website (August 20, 2020).Google Scholar
Hylton, Wil, “Craig Venter’s bugs might save the world,” New York Times (May 30, 2012).Google Scholar
Igo, Sarah, The Known Citizen: A History of Privacy in Modern America (Harvard University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Igoe, Michael, and Saldinger, Adva, “What Trump’s budget request says about US aid,” Devex (May 23, 2017).Google Scholar
Institute for Policy Studies, “Global inequality,” Inequality.org (April 2021), at: https://inequality.org/facts/global-inequality/#global-wealth-inequality.Google Scholar
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-Being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems (IEEE, New York, 2017).Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2022.Google Scholar
Isaacson, Walter, The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race (Simon & Schuster, 2021).Google Scholar
Isasi, R., Kleiderman, E., and Knoppers, B.M., “Editing policy to fit the genome?” Science 351:6271 (January 22, 2016).Google Scholar
Ito, Joi, “Kitchen counter biohacking,” Online personal blog, available at: https://joi.ito.com/weblog/2014/09/01/kitchen-counter.html.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Stine, “World’s largest container shipper Maersk aims to be CO2 neutral by 2050,” Reuters (December 5, 2018).Google Scholar
Jacobson, Mark, and Delucchi, Mark, “A path to sustainable energy,” Scientific American (November 2009).Google Scholar
Jacobson, Mark, and Delucchi, Mark, “Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part I: Technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials,” Energy Policy 39 (2011).Google Scholar
Jacobson, Mark, Delucchi, Mark A., Bauer, Zack A. F., et al., “100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight all-sector energy roadmaps for 139 countries of the world,” Joule 1:1(2017).Google Scholar
Jacobson, Mark, Delucchi, Mark A., Bazaouin, Gillaume, et al., “100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) all-sector energy roadmaps for the 50 United States,” Energy and Environmental Science 8 (May 27, 2015).Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen, “How to debunk misinformation about COVID, vaccines, and masks,” Scientific American 324:4 (April 2021).Google Scholar
Jarausch, Konrad, Broken Lives: How Ordinary Germans Experienced the Twentieth Century (Princeton University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila, Markle, Gerald E., Peterson, James C., and Pinch, Trevor, eds., Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Sage Publications, 2001).Google Scholar
Jefferson, Catherine, Lentzos, Filippa, and Marris, Claire, “Synthetic biology and biosecurity: challenging the “myths,” Frontiers in Public Health 2:115 (August 21, 2014).Google Scholar
Johnson, Deborah, and Wetmore, Jameson, eds., Technology and Society: Building Our Sociotechnical Future (MIT Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Johnson, Eric, “The black hole case: the injunction against the end of the world,” Tennessee Law Review 76:4 (2009).Google Scholar
Johnson, Steven, Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software (Scribner, 2001).Google Scholar
Johnston, Seth, How NATO Adapts: Strategy and Organization in the Atlantic Alliance Since 1950 (Johns Hopkins, 2017).Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans, The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age (University of Chicago Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Jotterrand, Fabrice, ed., Emerging Conceptual, Ethical, and Policy Issues in Bionanotechnology (Springer, 2008).Google Scholar
Juarrero, Alicia, Dynamics in Action: Intentional Behavior as a Complex System (MIT, 1999).Google Scholar
Kaczor, Christopher, The Ethics of Abortion: Women’s Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice, 2nd ed. (Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
Kaebnick, Gregory, and Murray, Thomas, eds., Synthetic Biology and Morality: Artificial Life and the Bounds of Nature (MIT, 2013).Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert, The Jungle Grows Back: America and Our Imperiled World (Vintage, 2018).Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan, Jenkins-Smith, Hank, and Braman, Donald, “Cultural cognition of scientific consensus,” Journal of Risk Research 14:2 (February 2011).Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Diener, Ed and Schwarz, Norbert, Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russell Sage, 2003).Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos, eds., Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Kanaan, Michael, T-Minus AI: Humanity’s Countdown to Artificial Intelligence and the New Pursuit of Global Power (BenBella, 2020).Google Scholar
Kanbur, Ravi, and Shue, Henry, eds., Climate Justice: Integrating Economics and Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Jerry, Humans Need Not Apply: A Guide to Wealth and Work in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (Yale University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Lawrence, NATO Divided, NATO United: The Evolution of an Alliance (Praeger, 2004).Google Scholar
Karns, Margaret, Mingst, Karen, and Stiles, Kendall, International Organizations: The Politics and Process of Global Governance, 3rd ed. (Rienner, 2015).Google Scholar
Kaufman, Joyce, A Concise History of U.S. Foreign Policy, 4th ed. (Rowman & Littlefield, 2017).Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Cornell University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Keith, David, Holmes, Geoffrey, St. Angelo, David, and Heidel, Kenton, “A process for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere,” Joule 2:8 (August 15, 2018).Google Scholar
Kelleher, Kevin, “Here’s why nobody’s talking about nanotech anymore,” Time (October 9, 2015).Google Scholar
Keller, David, et al., “The effects of carbon dioxide removal on the carbon cycle,” Current Climate Change Reports 4 (2018).Google Scholar
Kennedy, David, Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945 (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (Vintage, 1989).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul, The Parliament of Man: The Past, Present, and Future of the United Nations (Vintage, 2007).Google Scholar
Kenny, Charles, Getting Better: Why Global Development Is Succeeding – and How We Can Improve the World Even More (Basic, 2011).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World (Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, and Nye, Joseph Jr., Power and Interdependence, 4th ed. (Longman/Pearson, 2011).Google Scholar
Kerlin, Kat, “Ambitious Global Virome Project could mark the end of pandemic era,” University of California Davis News (February 22, 2018).Google Scholar
Khatchadourian, Raffi, “The Doomsday Invention: will artificial intelligence bring us utopia or destruction?” The New Yorker (November 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles, and Aliber, Robert, Manias, Panics, and Crashes; A History of Financial Crises, 7th ed. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).Google Scholar
King, David, Schrag, Daniel, Dadi, Zhou, Ye, Qi, and Ghosh, Arunabha, “Climate change: a risk assessment,” Centre for Science and Policy, Cambridge University (2015).Google Scholar
Klein, Richard, Nicholls, Robert J., Ragoonaden, Sachooda, and Capobianco, Michele, “Technological options for adaptation to climate change in coastal zones,” Journal of Coastal Research 17:3 (Summer 2001).Google Scholar
Kletz, Trevor, and Amyotte, Paul, Process Plants: A Handbook for Inherently Safer Design (CRC Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Knight, Will, “The dark secret at the heart of AI,” Technology Review (April 11, 2017).Google Scholar
Koblentz, Gregory, Living Weapons: Biological Warfare and International Security (Cornell University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Koch, Christof, The Quest for Consciousness: A Neurobiological Approach (Roberts, 2004).Google Scholar
Koch, Christof, “AI software teaches itself video games,” Scientific American Mind (July 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Koerner, Brendan, “Philip Kennedy: melding man and machine to free the paralyzed,” US News and World Report (January 3, 2000).Google Scholar
Koenig, Matthew, The Return of Great Power Rivalry: Democracy versus Autocracy from the Ancient World to the U.S. and China (Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Kolakowski, Leszek, Main Currents of Marxism (3 volumes), trans. by P. S. Falla (Norton, 2008).Google Scholar
Kolbert, Elizabeth, “Can carbon dioxide removal save the world?” The New Yorker (November 20, 2017).Google Scholar
Konrad, Kornelia, Coenen, Christopher, Dijkstra, Anne, Milburn, Colin, and van Lente, Harro, eds., Shaping Emerging Technologies: Governance, Innovation, Discourse (IOS Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Kostigen, Thomas, Hacking Planet Earth: How Geoengineering Can Help Us Reimagine the Future (Tarcher, 2020).Google Scholar
Krepon, Michael, and Caldwell, Dan, The Politics of Arms Control Treaty Ratification (Palgrave Macmillan, 1992).Google Scholar
Krotz, Ulrich, and Schild, Joachim, Shaping Europe: France, Germany, and Embedded Bilateralism from the Elysée Treaty to Twenty-First Century Politics (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul, The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008 (Norton, 2009).Google Scholar
Lackner, Klaus, et al., “The promise of negative emissions,” Science 354:6313 (November 11, 2016).Google Scholar
Ladikas, Miltos, Chaturvedi, Sachin, Zhao, Yandong, and Stemerding, Dirk, eds., Science and Technology Governance and Ethics: A Global Perspective from Europe, India, and China (Springer, 2015).Google Scholar
Lahsen, Myanna, “Technocracy, democracy, and U.S. climate politics: the need for demarcations,” Science, Technology, and Human Values 30:1 (Winter 2005).Google Scholar
Laird, Robin F., ed., Strangers and Friends: The Franco-German Security Relationship (St. Martin’s, 1989).Google Scholar
Landes, David, The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Larsen, Jeffrey, Arms Control: Cooperative Security in a Changing Environment (Rienner, 2002).Google Scholar
Larsen, Jeffrey, and Wirtz, James, eds., Arms Control and Cooperative Security (Rienner, 2009).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Laughlin, Robert, A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down (Basic, 2005).Google Scholar
Lee, Kai-Fu, AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2018).Google Scholar
Leinen, Jo, and Bummel, Andreas, A World Parliament: Governance and Democracy in the 21st Century, trans. by Ray Cunningham (Democracy Without Borders, 2018).Google Scholar
Lemon, Stanley, Hamburg, Margaret, Sparling, P. Frederick, Choffnes, Eileen, and Mack, Alison, Ethical and Legal Considerations in Mitigating Pandemic Disease (National Academies Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Lenat, Douglas, and Guha, R.V., Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project (Addison-Wesley, 1990).Google Scholar
Lennick, Michael, “We knew that if we succeeded, we could at one blow destroy a city,” Interview with Edward Teller, American Heritage 56:3 (June/July 2005).Google Scholar
Lenton, Tim, Earth System Science: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Lenton, Tim, Rockström, Johan, Gaffney, Owen, et al., “Climate tipping points – too risky to bet against,” Nature 575 (November 27, 2019).Google Scholar
Levesque, Hector, Common Sense, the Turing Test, and the Quest for Real AI (MIT Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Levitan, Dave, “Quick-change planet: do global climate tipping points exist?” Scientific American (March 25, 2013).Google Scholar
Levy, Frank, and Murnane, Richard, The New Division of Labor: How Computers Are Creating the Next Job Market (Princeton, 2012).Google Scholar
Lewis, Patricia, Williams, Heather, Pelopidas, Benoit, and Aghlani, Sasan, “Too close for comfort: cases of near nuclear use and options for policy,” Chatham House Report (The Royal Institute of International Affairs, April 2014).Google Scholar
Licata, Ignazio, and Sakaji, Ammar, eds., Physics of Emergence and Organization (World Scientific Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
Lincoln, Don, The Large Hadron Collider: The Extraordinary Story of the Higgs Boson and Other Stuff That Will Blow Your Mind (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Linder, Wolf, Swiss Democracy: Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multicultural Societies, 2nd ed. (Palgrave, 1998).Google Scholar
Lissner, Rebecca, and Rapp-Hooper, Mira, An Open World: How America Can Win the Contest for Twenty-First Century Order (Yale University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Lomborg, Bjorn, Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist’s Guide to Global Warming (Vintage, 2010).Google Scholar
Lott, Trent, and Daschle, Tom, Crisis Point: Why We Must – and How We Can – Overcome Our Broken Politics in Washington and Across America (Bloomsbury, 2016).Google Scholar
Louis, William Roger, and Owen, Roger, Suez 1956: The Crisis and its Consequences (Clarendon, 1991).Google Scholar
Lovering, Jessica, Trembath, Alex, Swain, Marian, and Lavin, Luke, “Renewables and nuclear at a glance” (Breakthrough Institute, 2014), at: https://thebreakthrough.org/issues/energy/renewables-and-nuclear-at-a-glance.Google Scholar
Lowrey, Annie, “Are states really more efficient than the federal government?” The Atlantic (October 2, 2017).Google Scholar
Lowrie, Heather, and Tait, Joyce, Guidelines for the Appropriate Risk Governance of Synthetic Biology (International Risk Governance Council, 2010).Google Scholar
Lugar, Richard, “Cooperative threat reduction and nuclear security,” Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 10 (2009).Google Scholar
Lyman, Edwin, “‘Advanced’ isn’t always better: assessing the safety, security, and environmental impacts of non-light-water nuclear reactors” (Union of Concerned Scientists, 2021), at: https://doi.org/10.47923/2021.14000.Google Scholar
Lynas, Mark, Nuclear 2.0: Why a Green Future Needs Nuclear Power (UIT Cambridge, 2013).Google Scholar
Lyubomirsky, Sonja, The How of Happiness: A New Approach to Getting the Life You Want (Penguin, 2008).Google Scholar
Maathai, Wangari, The Green Belt Movement: Sharing the Approach and the Experience (Lantern Publishing, 2003).Google Scholar
Macer, D. R. J., Azariah, J., and Srinives, P., “Attitudes to biotechnology in Asia,” International Journal of Biotechnology (January 2000).Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald, and Wajcman, Judy, eds., The Social Shaping of Technology (Open University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Maddison, Angus, Contours of the World Economy 1–2030 AD (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Mahaffey, James, Atomic Awakening: A New Look at the History and Future of Nuclear Power (Pegasus, 2009).Google Scholar
Mann, Michael, The New Climate War: The Fight to Take Back Our Planet (PublicAffairs, 2021).Google Scholar
Manninen, Bertha, Pro-Life, Pro-Choice: Shared Values in the Abortion Debate (Vanderbilt University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward, Mutz, Diana, and Brackbill, Devon, “Effects of the Great Recession on American attitudes toward trade,” British Journal of Political Science 49:1 (November 2016).Google Scholar
Marchant, Gary, Allenby, Braden, and Herkert, Joseph, eds., The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight (Springer, 2011).Google Scholar
Marchant, Gary, Abbott, Kenneth, and Allenby, Braden, eds., Innovative Governance Models for Emerging Technologies (Edward Elgar Publications, 2014).Google Scholar
Marcus, Gary, “Am I human? Researchers need new ways to distinguish artificial intelligence from the natural kind,” Scientific American 316:3 (March 2017).Google Scholar
Marcus, Gary, Rossi, Francesca, and Veloso, Manuela, “Beyond the Turing Test,” Special Issue of AI Magazine, 37:1 (Spring 2016).Google Scholar
Markandya, A. and Wilkinson, P., “Electricity generation and health,” The Lancet, 370:9591 (2007).Google Scholar
Marshall, George, Don’t Even Think About It: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Ignore Climate Change (Bloomsbury, 2014).Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa, “Institutions and cooperation: sanctions during the Falkland Islands conflict,” International Security 16:4 (Spring 1992).Google Scholar
Martin, Richard, Super Fuel: Thorium, The Green Energy Source for the Future (St. Martin’s Griffin, 2012).Google Scholar
Marwick, Arthur, War and Social Change in the Twentieth Century: A Comparative Study of Britain, France, Germany, Russia, and the United States (Macmillan, 1974).Google Scholar
Matthews, Dylan, “The amazing true socialist miracle of the Alaska Permanent Fund,” Vox (February 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Mayer, Milton, They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45 (University of Chicago Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Mayrhofer, Jan, and Gupta, Joyeeta, “The science and politics of co-benefits in climate policy,” Environmental Science and Policy 57 (March 2016).Google Scholar
Mazower, Mark, Governing the World: The History of an Idea, 1815 to the Present (Penguin, 2013).Google Scholar
McCarthy, Patrick, ed., France-Germany, 1983-1993: the Struggle to Cooperate (St. Martin’s, 1993).Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard, Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, 2016).Google Scholar
McClaughlin, Kay, Talking Together: Getting Beyond Polarization Through Civil Dialogue (Lifeforce, 2017).Google Scholar
McCormick, John, Understanding the European Union: A Concise Introduction, 6th ed. (Palgrave, 2014).Google Scholar
McCray, Matthew, “Rapid reaction capability of the European Union: taking that last big step,” Connections 13:4 (Fall, 2014).Google Scholar
McDermott, Drew, “Response to ‘The singularity: a philosophical analysis’ by David Chalmers,” Journal of Consciousness Studies 19:1–2 (2012).Google Scholar
McDonald, Forrest, States’ Rights and the Union: Imperium in Imperio, 1776–1876 (University Press of Kansas, 2000).Google Scholar
McDougall, Walter, France’s Rhineland Policy, 1914-1924: The Last Bid for a Balance of Power in Europe (Princeton University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
McGonigal, Jane, Reality is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World (Penguin, 2011).Google Scholar
McGuire, Steven, and Smith, Michael, The European Union and the United States: Competition and Convergence in the Global Arena (Red Globe Press, 2008).Google Scholar
McLaren, Duncan, “Quantifying the potential scale of mitigation deterrence from greenhouse gas removal techniques,” Climatic Change 162 (2020).Google Scholar
McNamara, Robert S., Wilson’s Ghost: Reducing the Risk of Conflict, Killing, and Catastrophe in the 21st Century (Public Affairs, 2003).Google Scholar
McNerney, Ruth, Wondafrash, Beyene A., Amena, Kebede et al., “Field test of a novel detection device for Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen in cough,” BMC Infectious Diseases 10:161 (2010).Google Scholar
McQueen, Noah, Psarras, Peter C., Pilorgé, Hélène, and Liguori, Simona, “Cost analysis of direct air capture and sequestration coupled to low-carbon thermal energy in the United States,” Environmental Science and Technology 54:12 (2020).Google Scholar
McWhirter, Cameron, and Wise, Lindsay, “Trump pressured Georgia Secretary of State to ‘find’ votes,” Wall Street Journal (January 4, 2021).Google Scholar
Meacham, Jack, Talking Sense About Politics: How to Overcome Political Polarization In Your Next Conversation (Quaerere, 2017).Google Scholar
Metz, Cade, “Inside OpenAI, Elon Musk’s wild plan to set artificial intelligence free,” Wired (April 27, 2016).Google Scholar
Metz, Cade, “Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, and the feud over killer robots,” New York Times (June 9, 2018).Google Scholar
Miller, John, and Page, Scott, Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life (Princeton, 2007).Google Scholar
Miller, Judith, Engelberg, Stephen, and Broad, William, Germs: Biological Weapons and America’s Secret War (Simon & Schuster, 2002).Google Scholar
Miller, Melanie, and Page, Scott, Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life (Princeton, 2007).Google Scholar
Minsky, Marvin, The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of the Human Mind (Simon & Schuster, 2006).Google Scholar
Mitchel, Mark, and Schueter, Nathan, eds., The Humane Vision of Wendell Berry (ISI, 2011).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Melanie, Artificial Intelligence: A Guide for Thinking Humans (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2019).Google Scholar
Montgomery, Scott, and Graham, Thomas Jr., Seeing the Light: The Case for Nuclear Power in the 21st Century (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Mooney, Chris, The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science – and Reality (Wiley, 2012).Google Scholar
Moorehead, Caroline, Troublesome People: The Warriors of Pacifism (Adler & Adler, 1987).Google Scholar
Moravec, Hans, Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence (Harvard, 1988).Google Scholar
Morello, Carol, “Foreign aid cuts proposed, but ‘friends’ might be protected,” Washington Post (February 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Moreno, Jonathan, The Body Politic: The Battle Over Science in America (Bellevue, 2011).Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Richard, and Pizer, William, Reality Check: The Nature and Performance of Voluntary Environmental Programs in the United States, Europe, and Japan (Resources for the Future, 2007).Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 7th ed. (McGraw-Hill, 2005).Google Scholar
Morris, Charles, A Rabble of Dead Money: The Great Crash and the Global Depression: 1929-1939 (Public Affairs, 2017).Google Scholar
Morris, Julian, Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle (Butterworth/Heinemann, 2000).Google Scholar
Morton, Oliver, The Planet Remade: How Geoengineering Could Change the World (Princeton University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Mozur, Paul, “Beijing wants AI to be made in China by 2030,” New York Times (July 20, 2017).Google Scholar
Mullaney, Thomas, Peters, Benjamin, Hicks, Mar, and Philip, Kavita, eds., Your Computer Is On Fire (MIT Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Mulligan, James, Ellison, Gretchen, Levin, Kelly, and McCormick, Colin, “Technological carbon removal in the United States,” Working Paper (World Resources Institute, September 2018).Google Scholar
Mumford, Lewis, and Winner, Langdon, Technics and Civilization (University of Chicago Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Munk, Nina, The Idealist: Jeffrey Sachs and the Quest to End World Poverty (Anchor, 2013).Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey, Ellis, George, and O’Connor, Timothy, eds., Downward Causation and the Neurobiology of Free Will (Springer, 2009).Google Scholar
Musser, George, “Artificial imagination: how machines could learn creativity and common sense, among other human qualities,” Scientific American 320:5 (May 2019).Google Scholar
Nardi, Bonnie, My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft (Digital Culture Books, 2010).Google Scholar
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda (National Academies Press, 2019).Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences Committee on Advances in Technology and the Prevention of Their Application to Next Generation Biowarfare Threats, Globalization, Biosecurity, and the Future of the Life Sciences (National Academies Press, 2006).Google Scholar
National Biosurveillance Advisory Committee, Improving the Nation’s Ability to Detect and Respond to 21st Century Urgent Health Threats (Createspace, 2014).Google Scholar
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, “Universal influenza vaccine research” (May 2018), at: https://www.niaid.nih.gov/diseases-conditions/universal-influenza-vaccine-research.Google Scholar
Nature editorial board, “Curbing global warming could save US$20 trillion,” Nature online (May 23, 2018).Google Scholar
Nelsen, Brent, and Stubb, Alexander, The European Union: Readings on the Theory and Practice of European Integration, 4th ed. (Rienner, 2014).Google Scholar
Nichols, David, Eisenhower 1956: The President’s Year of Crisis – Suez and the Brink of War (Simon & Schuster, 2012).Google Scholar
Nielsen, Anne, Plantinga, Andrew, and Alig, Ralph, “New cost estimates for carbon sequestration through afforestation in the U.S.,” General Technical Report PNW-GTR-888 (USDA Forest Service, March 2014).Google Scholar
Nilsson, Sten, and Schopfhauser, Wolfgang, “The carbon sequestration potential of a global afforestation program,” Climatic Change 30:3 (July 1995).Google Scholar
Nordhaus, Ted, and Shellenberger, Michael, Break Through: Why We Can’t Leave Saving the Planet to Environmentalists (Mariner, 2009).Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World (Yale University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William, “Integrated assessment models of climate change,” National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Reporter 2017, no. 3.Google Scholar
Nordvig, Jens, The Fall of the Euro: Reinventing the Eurozone and the Future of Global Investing (McGraw Hill, 2014).Google Scholar
Nourbakhsh, Illah, Humans Need Not Apply: A Guide to Wealth and Work in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (Yale University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Noyce, Ryan S., Lederman, Seth, and Evans, David H., “Construction of an infectious horsepox virus vaccine from chemically synthesized DNA fragments,” PLOS One (January 19, 2018).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha, Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach (Harvard, 2011).Google Scholar
O’Connor, Cailin, and Weatherall, James, The Misinformation Age: How False Beliefs Spread (Yale University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Oehlschlaeger, Fritz, The Achievement of Wendell Berry: The Hard History of Love (University of Kentucky, 2011).Google Scholar
Olsen, Jonathan, and McCormick, John, The European Union: Politics and Policies, 6th ed. (Westview, 2016).Google Scholar
O’Mathuna, Donal, Nanoethics: Big Ethical Issues with Small Technology (Continuum, 2009).Google Scholar
Omohundro, Stephen, “The Nature of Self-Improving Artificial Intelligence” (Self-Aware Systems, 2008).Google Scholar
Omohundro, Stephen, “The basic AI drives,” at: https://selfawaresystems.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/ai_drives_final.pdf.Google Scholar
Omohundro, Stephen, “Autonomous technology and the greater human good,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 26:3 (2014).Google Scholar
Ord, Toby, The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity (Hachette, 2020).Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi, “The scientific consensus on climate change,” Science 306:5702 (December 2004).Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi, and Conway, Erik, Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (Bloomsbury, 2010).Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, “Statistics on resource flows to developing countries” (OECD, updated December 22, 2017).Google Scholar
Osterhammel, Jurgen, and Petersson, Niels, Globalization: A Short History (Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Overbye, Dennis, “Government seeks dismissal of end-of-world suit against collider,” New York Times (June 27, 2008).Google Scholar
Overy, Richard, The Twilight Years: The Paradox of Britain Between the Wars (Penguin, 2009).Google Scholar
Owen, Richard, Bessant, John, and Heintz, Maggy, eds., Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (Wiley, 2013).Google Scholar
Palazchenko, Pavel, My Years with Gorbachev and Shevardnadze: The Memoir of a Soviet Interpreter (Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Page, Scott, Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life (Princeton, 2007).Google Scholar
Panda, Ankit, “The uncertain future of the INF Treaty” (Council on Foreign Relations, February 21, 2018), at: www.cfr.org/backgrounder/uncertain-future-inf-treaty.Google Scholar
Papp, Daniel, Johnson, Loch, and Endicott, John, American Foreign Policy: History, Politics, and Policy (Pearson, 2004).Google Scholar
Pardo, R., Midden, C., and Miller, J. D., “Attitudes toward biotechnology in the European Union,” Journal of Biotechnology 98:1 (September 11, 2002).Google Scholar
Parens, Erik, Johnston, Josephine, and Moses, Jacob, Ethical Issues in Synthetic Biology: An Overview of the Debates (Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and Hastings Center, 2009).Google Scholar
Paris, Celia, “Breaking down bipartisanship: when and why citizens react to cooperation across party lines,” Public Opinion Quarterly 81:2 (May 2017).Google Scholar
Parker, Randall, ed., The Economics of the Great Depression: A Twenty-First Century Look Back at the Economics of the Interwar Era (Edward Elgar, 2007).Google Scholar
Pedersen, Susan, The Guardians: The League of Nations and the Crisis of Empire (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Perlroth, Nicole, This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyber-Weapons Arms Race (Bloomsbury, 2021).Google Scholar
Persily, Nathaniel, ed., Solutions to Political Polarization in America (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Peterson, Christopher, and Seligman, Martin, Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification (Oxford, 2004).Google Scholar
Peterson, James, American Foreign Policy: Alliance Politics in a Century of War, 1914-2014 (Bloomsbury, 2014).Google Scholar
Peterson, Jeannie, The Aftermath: The Human and Ecological Consequences of Nuclear War (Pantheon, 1983).Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (Belknap, 2014).Google Scholar
Pimentel, Diego, Aymar, Iñigo, and Lawson, Max, “Reward work, not wealth,” Oxfam Briefing Paper (Oxfam, January 2018).Google Scholar
Pincus, Walter, “New agreement on missile monitoring facility has elements of old plan,” Washington Post (July 13, 2009).Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven, The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined (Viking, 2011).Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven, Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress (Viking, 2018).Google Scholar
Plesch, Dan, Miletic, Kevin, and Rauf, Tariq, eds., Reintroducing Disarmament and Cooperative Security to the Toolbox of 21st Century Leaders (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 2017).Google Scholar
Pool, Robert, Beyond Engineering: How Society Shapes Technology (Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Poore, J., and Nemecek, T., “Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers,” Science 360:6392 (June 1, 2018).Google Scholar
Porcar, Manuel, and Pereto, Juli, Synthetic Biology: From iGEM to the Artificial Cell (Springer, 2014).Google Scholar
Power, Samantha, A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide (Basic Books, 2002).Google Scholar
Preimesberger, Freya, “Researchers design flu virus breathalyzer,” The Daily Texan (February 16, 2017).Google Scholar
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, New Directions: The Ethics of Synthetic Biology and Emerging Technologies (Washington, D.C., 2010).Google Scholar
Price, Jeffrey, Practical Aviation Security: Predicting and Preventing Future Threats, 2nd ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013).Google Scholar
Price-Smith, Andrew, Contagion and Chaos: Disease, Ecology, and National Security in the Era of Globalization (MIT, 2009).Google Scholar
Priestley, Theo, “Does Elon Musk and OpenAI want to democratise or sanitise artificial intelligence?” Forbes (December 13, 2015).Google Scholar
Program for Public Consultation, University of Maryland, and Voice of the People, “A not so divided America” (2014), at: https://publicconsultation.org/wp-content/uploads/reports/Red_Blue_Report_Jul2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Purves, William, Orians, Gordon H., Heller, H. Craig, and Sadava, David E., Life: The Science of Biology, 5th ed. (Freeman/Sinauer, 1998).Google Scholar
Quammen, David, Spillover: Animal Infections and the Next Human Pandemic (Norton, 2012).Google Scholar
Rahman, Redwanur and Kamruzzaman, A. K. M., Impact of Climate Change on the Outbreak of Infectious Diseases (Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar
Ramachandran, Gurumurthy, Wolf, Susan M., Paradise, Jordan, et al., “Recommendations for oversight of nanotechnobiology,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13:4 (2011).Google Scholar
Ramesh, Randeep, “Paradise almost lost; Maldives seek to buy a new homeland,” The Guardian (November 9, 2008).Google Scholar
Randerson, James, “Revealed: the lax laws that could allow assembly of deadly virus DNA,” The Guardian (June 14, 2006).Google Scholar
Rasch, Philip, Tilmes, Simone, Turco, Richard P. et al., “An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (August 29, 2008).Google Scholar
Realmonte, Giulia, Drouet, Laurent, Gambhir, Ajay et al., “An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways,” Nature Communications 10 (2019).Google Scholar
Reed, Stanley, and Ewing, Jack, “Hydrogen is one answer to climate change. Getting it is the hard part,” New York Times (July 13, 2021).Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian, and Snidal, Duncan, eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Rifkin, Jeremy, The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism (Palgrave/Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar
Ritchie, Hannah, “What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?” Our World in Data (May 5, 2021), at: https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy.Google Scholar
Roberts, Adam, and Kingsbury, Benedict, eds., United Nations, Divided World: The UN’s Role in International Relations, 2nd ed. (Clarendon, 1994).Google Scholar
Robinson, Mary, Climate Justice: Hope, Resilience, and the Fight for a Sustainable Future (Bloomsbury, 2018).Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani, The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy (Norton, 2012).Google Scholar
Romm, Joseph, Climate Change: What Everyone Needs to Know, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Rose, Sonya, Which People’s War? National Identity and Citizenship in Wartime Britain, 1939–1945 (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N., and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, eds., Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Rothman, Daniel, “Thresholds of catastrophe in the Earth system,” Science Advances 3 (2017).Google Scholar
Rozell, Mark R., and Wilcox, Clyde, Federalism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno, Science and Diplomacy: A New Dimension of International Relations (Springer, 2017).Google Scholar
Russell, Rudolph, Neural Networks: Easy Guide to Artificial Neural Networks (CreateSpace, 2018).Google Scholar
Russell, Stuart, Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control (Penguin, 2019).Google Scholar
Russell, Stuart, and Norvig, Peter, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3rd ed. (Prentice Hall, 2010).Google Scholar
Rychlak, Joseph, Artificial Intelligence and Human Reason: A Teleological Critique (Columbia University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Rychlak, Joseph, and Scheier, Christian, eds., Understanding Intelligence (MIT, 1999).Google Scholar
Sachs, Jeffrey, The End of Poverty: How We Can Make It Happen in Our Lifetime (Penguin, 2005).Google Scholar
Sachs, Jeffrey, A New Foreign Policy: Beyond American Exceptionalism (Columbia University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Sadowski, Jathan, “The much-needed and sane congressional office that Gingrich killed off and we need back,” The Atlantic (October 26, 2012).Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott, and Waltz, Kenneth, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: An Enduring Debate (Norton, 2013).Google Scholar
Sainato, Michael, “Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk, and Bill Gates warn about artificial intelligence,” The Observer (August 19, 2015).Google Scholar
Sakai, Jill, “Metabolic breathalyzer reveals early signs of disease,” University of Wisconsin-Madison News (February 6, 2012).Google Scholar
Sample, Ian, “‘It’s able to create knowledge itself’: ‘Google unveils AI that learns on its own,” The Guardian (October 18, 2017).Google Scholar
Sanchez, Joan-Pau, and McInnes, Colin, “Optimal sunshade configurations for space-based geoengineering near the Sun–Earth L1 point,” PLOS One (August 26, 2015).Google Scholar
Sandberg, Anders, and Bostrom, Nick, “Whole brain emulation: a roadmap,” Technical Report #2008‐3 (Future of Humanity Institute, Oxford University, 2008).Google Scholar
Sanger, David, The Perfect Weapon: War, Sabotage, and Fear in the Cyber Age (Crown, 2018).Google Scholar
Sanger, David, and Schmitt, Eric, “Biden signals break with Trump foreign policy in a wide-ranging State Dept. speech,” New York Times (February 4, 2021).Google Scholar
Sanger, David, and Verma, Pranshu, “The F.B.I. confirms that DarkSide, a ransomware group, was behind the hack of a major U.S. pipeline,” New York Times (May 10, 2021).Google Scholar
Sanger, David, and Broad, William, “To counter Russia, U.S. signals nuclear arms are back in a big way,” New York Times (February 4, 2018).Google Scholar
Sapolsky, Robert, Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst (Penguin, 2018).Google Scholar
Sarotte, Elise, 1989: The Struggle to Create Post-Cold War Europe (Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Sato, Motoaki, “Thermochemistry of the formation of fossil fuels,” Geochemical Society Special Publication No. 2 (1990).Google Scholar
Savage, Mike, “Changing social class identities in post-war Britain: perspectives from mass-observation,” Sociological Research Online 12:3 (May 2007).Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. Keith, ed., Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Schabas, William, An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, 6th ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Schell, Jonathan, The Fate of the Earth and The Abolition [combined volume] (Stanford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Schell, Jonathan, The Unconquerable World: Power, Nonviolence, and the Will of the People (Metropolitan Books, 2003).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas, Arms and Influence (Yale University Press, 2008 [first published 1966]).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas, and Halperin, Morton, Strategy and Arms Control (Martino Fine, 2014).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Markus, “Xenobiology: a new form of life as the ultimate biosafety tool,” BioEssays 32 (2010).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Markus, ed., Synthetic Biology: Industrial and Environmental Applications (Wiley-Blackwell, 2012).Google Scholar
Schnirring, Lisa, “Experts propose $2 billion global vaccine fund,” Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (July 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Schwartzberg, Joseph, Transforming the United Nations System: Designs for a Workable World (United Nations University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Sclove, Richard, Reinventing Technology Assessment: A 21st Century Model (W. Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2010).Google Scholar
Scott, James, Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States (Yale University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Seidensticker, Bob, Future Hype: The Myths of Technology Change (Berrett-Koehler, 2006).Google Scholar
Sekera, June, and Lichtenberger, Andreas, “Assessing carbon capture: public policy, science, and societal need,” Biophysical Economics and Sustainability 5:14 (2020).Google Scholar
Service, Robert F., “Synthetic microbe lives with fewer than 500 genes,” Science (March 24, 2016).Google Scholar
Service, Robert F. “Cost plunges for capturing carbon dioxide from the air,” Science (June 7, 2018).Google Scholar
Sewell, William, Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation (University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Shafir, Eldar, ed., The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy (Princeton University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon, Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Shear, Michael, and Saul, Stephanie, “Trump, in taped call, pressured Georgia official to ‘find’ votes to overturn election,” New York Times (January 3, 2021).Google Scholar
Sheehan, James, Where Have All the Soldiers Gone? The Transformation of Modern Europe (Houghton Mifflin, 2008).Google Scholar
Shen, Alice, “How China hopes to play a leading role in developing next-generation nuclear reactors,” South China Morning Post (January 10, 2019).Google Scholar
Shonting, David, and Ezrailson, Cathy, Chicxulub: The Impact and Tsunami (Springer, 2017).Google Scholar
Shulman, Carl, “Omohundro’s ‘Basic AI Drives’ and Catastrophic Risks” (The Singularity Institute, 2010).Google Scholar
Sides, John, “Most Americans live in Purple America, not Red or Blue America,” Washington Post (November 12, 2013).Google Scholar
Siegel, Ethan, “Could the Large Hadron Collider make an Earth-killing black hole?” Forbes (March 11, 2016).Google Scholar
Sigrin, Benjamin, and Mooney, Meghan, “Rooftop solar technical potential for low-to-moderate income households in the United States,” Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-70901 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, April 2018).Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn, Evidence for Hope: Making Human Rights Work in the 21st Century (Princeton University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Silver, David, Hubert, Thomas, Schrittwieser, Julian, et al., “A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and Go through self-play,” Science 362:6419 (December 7, 2018).Google Scholar
Singer, Donald, and Upton, Ronald, Guidelines for Laboratory Quality Auditing (CRC Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Singer, Peter, One World Now: The Ethics of Globalization (Yale University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Singer, P. W., Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century (Penguin, 2009).Google Scholar
Singer, P. W., and Friedman, Allan, Cybersecurity and Cyberwar: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Sloan, Stanley, Defense of the West: NATO, The European Union, and the Transatlantic Bargain (Manchester University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Sluga, Glenda, Internationalism in the Age of Nationalism (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Smalley, Richard, “Of chemistry, love, and nanobots,” Scientific American (September 2001).Google Scholar
Smith, Christian, What Is a Person? Rethinking Humanity, Social Life, and the Moral Good from the Person Up (University of Chicago Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Smith, Simon, ed., Reassessing Suez 1956: New Perspectives on the Crisis and Its Aftermath (Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Snowe, Olympia, Fighting for Common Ground: How We Can Fix the Stalemate in Congress (Weinstein Books, 2013).Google Scholar
Soares, Nate, “The value learning problem,” presented at 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (New York, 2016), at: https://intelligence.org/files/ValueLearningProblem.pdf.Google Scholar
Soares, Nate, and Fallenstein, Benya, “Agent foundations for aligning machine intelligence with human interests: a technical research agenda,” Report 2014–8 (Machine Intelligence Research Institute, 2014).Google Scholar
Solomon, Fred, and Marston, Robert, eds., The Medical Implications of Nuclear War (National Academies Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Song, Jean, “Bill Gates on how to outsmart global epidemics,” CBS News online (January 18, 2017).Google Scholar
Soros, George, and Schmitz, Gregor, The Tragedy of the European Union: Disintegration or Revival? (Public Affairs, 2014).Google Scholar
Sotala, Kaj, and Yampolskiy, Roman, “Responses to catastrophic AGI risk: a survey,” Technical Report 2013–2 (Machine Intelligence Research Institute, 2015).Google Scholar
Sovacool, Benjamin, Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power: A Critical Global Assessment of Atomic Energy (World Scientific, 2011).Google Scholar
Sowers, Jeannie, Vengosh, Avner, and Weinthal, Erika, “Climate change, water resources, and the politics of adaptation in the Middle East and North Africa,” Climatic Change 104 (2011).Google Scholar
Spindlove, Jeremy, and Simonsen, Clifford, Terrorism Today: The Past, the Players, the Future, 5th ed. (Pearson, 2013).Google Scholar
Springs, Jason, Healthy Conflict in Contemporary American Society: From Enemy to Adversary (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Staub, Ervin, The Roots of Evil: The Origins of Genocide and Other Group Violence (Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Steel, Brent, ed., Science and Politics: An A-to-Z Guide to Issues and Controversies (CQ Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Stern, Paul, Dietz, Thomas, Abel, Troy, Guagnano, Gregory A. and Kalof, Linda, “A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism,” Human Ecology Review 6:2 (Winter 1999).Google Scholar
Sterrett, Dave, Aborting Aristotle: Examining the Fatal Fallacies in the Abortion Debate (St. Augustine’s Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph, The Euro: How a Common Currency Threatens the Future of Europe (Norton, 2016).Google Scholar
Stock, Gregory, Redesigning Humans: Choosing Our Genes, Changing Our Future (Mariner, 2003).Google Scholar
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, SIPRI Yearbook 2017: Armaments, Disarmament, and International Security (SIPRI, 2017), at: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2017-09/yb17-summary-eng.pdf.Google Scholar
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, SIPRI Yearbook 2020: Armaments, Disarmament, and International Security (SIPRI, 2020), at: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/YB20%2010%20WNF.pdf.Google Scholar
Stoler, Mark, Allies and Adversaries: The Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Grand Alliance, and U.S. Strategy in World War II (University of North Carolina Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Strogatz, Steven, “One giant step for a chess-playing machine,” New York Times (December 26, 2018).Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media (Princeton University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Svetlana, Savranskaya, “New sources on the role of Soviet submarines in the Cuban Missile Crisis,” Journal of Strategic Studies, 28:2 (2005).Google Scholar
Swan, Jonathan, “Trump’s budget calls for major boost to nukes,” Axios (February 9, 2020).Google Scholar
Sweet, William, Climate Diplomacy from Rio to Paris: The Effort to Contain Global Warming (Yale University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Taleb, Nassim, The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable (Random House, 2007).Google Scholar
Taubman, Philip, The Partnership: Five Cold Warriors and Their Quest to Ban the Bomb (Harper, 2012).Google Scholar
Tavoni, Massimo, and Socolow, Robert, “Modeling meets science and technology: an introduction to a special issue on negative emissions,” Climatic Change 118 (2013).Google Scholar
Taylor, A .J. P., The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848-1918 (Oxford University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Tegmark, Max, Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (Knopf, 2017).Google Scholar
“The Empire Strikes Back,” cover story, Newsweek (April 19, 1982).Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward, The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays (Monthly Review Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Thornton, Chuck, “US–Russia proposed joint data exchange center: a historical compilation,” Scribd (September 2009).Google Scholar
Thurber, James, and Yoshinaka, Antoine, eds., American Gridlock: The Sources, Character and Impact of Political Polarization (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Tiersky, Ronald, and Jones, Erik, eds., Europe Today: A Twenty-First Century Introduction, 5th ed. (Rowman & Littlefield, 2014).Google Scholar
Tollefson, Jeff, “Sucking carbon dioxide from air is cheaper than scientists thought,” Nature 558 (June 7, 2018).Google Scholar
Tokarska, Katarzyna, and Zickfeld, Kirsten, “The effectiveness of net negative carbon emissions in reversing anthropogenic climate change,” Environmental Research Letters 10 (September 10, 2015).Google Scholar
Tomasky, Michael, If We Can Keep It: How the Republic Collapsed and How It Might Be Saved (Liveright, 2019).Google Scholar
Townsend, Charles, Terrorism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Trafton, Ann, “Rewiring cells: how a handful of MIT electrical engineers pioneered synthetic biology,” MIT Technology Review (April 19, 2011).Google Scholar
Trakimavicius, Lukas, “Is Russia violating the biological weapons convention?” Atlantic Council website (May 23, 2018).Google Scholar
Treisman, Rachel, “California program giving $500 no-string-attached stipends pays off, study finds,” National Public Radio (March 4, 2021).Google Scholar
Tucker, Jonathan, War of Nerves: Chemical Warfare from World War I to Al-Qaeda (Anchor, 2006).Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert, and Zilinskas, Raymond, “The promise and peril of synthetic biology,” The New Atlantis 12 (Spring 2006).Google Scholar
Tumpey, Terrence M., Basler, Christopher F., Aguilar, Patricia V., et al., “Characterization of the reconstructed 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic virus,” Science 310:5745 (October 7, 2005).Google Scholar
Turkle, Sherry, Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less From Each Other (Basic, 2011).Google Scholar
Turner, Barry, Suez 1956: The Inside Story of the First Oil War (Hodder & Stoughton, 2007).Google Scholar
Turner, Barry, The Berlin Airlift: A New History of the Cold War’s Decisive Relief Operation (Icon, 2017).Google Scholar
Ugarriza, Juan, and Caluwaerts, Didier, eds., Democratic Deliberation in Deeply Divided Societies: From Conflict to Common Ground (Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar
United Nations, “General Assembly approves $3 billion UN budget for 2020,” UN News (December 27, 2019), at: https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/12/1054431.Google Scholar
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, “World population projected to reach 9.8 billion in 2050 and 11.2 billion in 2100” (June 21, 2017).Google Scholar
Union of Concerned Scientists, “Close calls with nuclear weapons,” Fact Sheet (January 2015), at: https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/04/Close%20Calls%20with%20Nuclear%20Weapons.pdf.Google Scholar
Union of Concerned Scientists, “Each country’s share of CO2 emissions,” at: https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/science-and-impacts/science/each-countrys-share-of-co2.html.Google Scholar
United States Government General Accounting Office, Inspectors General: Department of Defense IG Peer Reviews (US GAO, 2011).Google Scholar
Urge-Vorsatz, Diana, et al., “Measuring the co-benefits of climate change mitigation,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 39 (2014).Google Scholar
Urry, Lisa, Cain, Michael, Wasserman, Steven, Minorsky, Peter, and Reece, Jane, Campbell Biology, 11th ed. (Pearson, 2016).Google Scholar
US Energy Information Administration, “A look at the U.S. commercial building stock,” (March 4, 2015), at: https://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/reports/2012/buildstock/.Google Scholar
Vandenbergh, Michael, “Order without social norms: how personal norm activation can protect the environment,” Northwestern University Law Review 99:3 (2004–2005).Google Scholar
Vandenbergh, Michael, and Gilligan, Jonathan, Beyond Politics: The Private Governance Response to Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Van den Bossche, Peter, and Zdouc, Werner, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases, and Materials, 4th ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Van der Linden, Sander, Leiserowitz, Anthony, Rosenthal, Seth, and Maibach, Edward, “Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change,” Global Challenges 1:2 (2017).Google Scholar
Van Eijndhoven, Josée, “Technology assessment: product or process?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54:2–3 (1997).Google Scholar
Vanian, Jonathan, “Four big takeaways from Satya Nadella’s talk at Microsoft Build,” Fortune (May 7, 2018).Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe, and Vanderborght, Yannick, Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy (Harvard University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Victor, David, Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Vogel, Kathleen, Phantom Menace or Looming Danger? A New Framework for Assessing Bioweapons Threats (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Von Mering, Sabine, and McCarty, Timothy, Right-Wing Radicalism Today: Perspectives from Europe and the US (Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Wade, Nicholas, A World Beyond Healing: The Prologue and Aftermath of Nuclear War (Norton, 1987).Google Scholar
Wade, Nicholas, “Scientists seek ban on method of editing the human genome,” New York Times (March 19, 2015).Google Scholar
Wagner, Gernot, and Weitzman, Martin, Climate Shock: The Economic Consequences of a Hotter Planet (Princeton University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Wall Street Journal Staff, “Trump’s Georgia call: listen to the audio and read a full transcript: President urged Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to overturn the state’s victory for President-elect Joe Biden,” Wall Street Journal (January 3, 2021).Google Scholar
Wall, Don, “National Building Code to include climate change obligations,” Daily Commercial News (December 20, 2018).Google Scholar
Wallace-Wells, David, The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming (Tim Duggan Books, 2019).Google Scholar
Wallach, Wendell, A Dangerous Master: How to Keep Technology from Slipping Beyond Our Control (Basic, 2015).Google Scholar
Wallach, Wendell, and Allen, Colin, Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong (Oxford University Press Scholarship Online, 2009).Google Scholar
Weart, Spencer, The Discovery of Global Warming, 2nd ed. (Harvard University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Weber, Eugen, Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870–1914 (Stanford University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Weinberg, Leonard, Right-Wing Violence in the Western World Since World War II (World Scientific Publishing, 2021).Google Scholar
Weinberg, Leonard, and Martin, Susanne, The Role of Terrorism in Twenty-First Century Warfare (Manchester University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas, What’s Wrong with the United Nations and How to Fix It, 3rd ed. (Polity, 2016).Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas, and Wilkinson, Rorden, eds., International Organization and Global Governance (Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas, and Daws, Sam, eds., The Oxford Handbook of the United Nations, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Welch, Craig, “Climate change pushing tropical diseases toward Arctic,” National Geographic (June 14, 2017).Google Scholar
West, Geoffrey, Scale: The Universal Laws of Life, Growth, and Death in Organisms, Cities, and Companies (Penguin, 2018).Google Scholar
White House, “The Recovery Act made the largest single investment in clean energy in history, driving the deployment of clean energy, promoting energy efficiency, and supporting manufacturing,” Fact Sheet (The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, February 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Whiteside, Kerry, Precautionary Politics: Principle and Practice in Confronting Environmental Risk (MIT, 2006).Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje, Borzel, Tanja, and Risse, Thomas, eds., European Integration Theory, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Wiener, Jonathan, “The Tragedy of the Uncommons: on the politics of apocalypse,” Global Policy 7:1 (May 2016).Google Scholar
Wilks, Yorick, “Will there be superintelligence and would it hate us?” AI Magazine 38:4 (Winter 2017).Google Scholar
Williams, James, Haley, Benjamin, Jones, Ryan, Policy Implications of Deep Decarbonization in the United States (Energy and Environmental Economics, Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations, and Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project, 2015).Google Scholar
Williams, Robert, and Viotti, Paul, Arms Control: History, Theory, and Policy (Praeger, 2012).Google Scholar
Williams, Sam, Arguing AI: The Battle for 21st Century Science (AtRandom Books, 2002).Google Scholar
Wilson, James, Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It (Basic, 1991).Google Scholar
Wittner, Lawrence, Confronting the Bomb: A Short History of the World Nuclear Disarmament Movement (Stanford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Wittner, Lawrence, Toward Nuclear Abolition: A History of the World Nuclear Disarmament Movement (Stanford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Wood, David, Deep Time, Dark Times: On Being Geologically Human (Fordham University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Wood, Houston, Current Debates in Peace and Conflict Studies (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
World Health Organization, “WHO Strategic Action Plan for pandemic influenza” (WHO, 2007) at: http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/influenza/StregPlanEPR_GIP_2006_2.pdf.Google Scholar
World Institute for Nuclear Security, “The journey beyond 2016: WINS strategy and goals” (2015).Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert, Be Very Afraid: The Cultural Response to Terror, Pandemics, Environmental Devastation, Nuclear Annihilation, and Other Threats (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Yampolskiy, Roman, Artificial Superintelligence: A Futuristic Approach (CRC Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Yang, Andrew, The War on Normal People: The Truth About America’s Disappearing Jobs and Why Universal Basic Income Is Our Future (Hachette, 2018).Google Scholar
Yergin, Daniel, The New Map: Energy, Climate, and the Clash of Nations (Penguin, 2020).Google Scholar
York, Herbert, and Lakoff, Sanford, A Shield in Space? Technology, Politics, and the Strategic Defense Initiative (University of California Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Young, Robert, Postcolonialism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Yudkowsky, Eliezer, “A reply to Francois Chollet on intelligence explosion” (Machine Intelligence Research Institute, 2017), at: https://intelligence.org/2017/12/06/chollet/.Google Scholar
Yudkowsky, Eliezer “Complex value systems are required to realize valuable futures” (Machine Intelligence Research Institute, 2011), at: http://intelligence.org/files/ComplexValues.pdf.Google Scholar
Zilinskas, Raymond, “The Soviet biological weapons program and its legacy in today’s Russia,” Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Occasional Paper 11 (National Defense University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Zimdars, Melissa, and McLeod, Kembrew, eds., Fake News: Understanding Media and Misinformation in the Digital Age (MIT Press, 2020).Google Scholar