Book contents
- Etruria and Anatolia
- Mediterranean Studies in Antiquity
- Etruria and Anatolia
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Maps and Figures
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Notes on Abbreviations and Spelling
- Introduction
- Part I Broadening Perspectives
- Part II Interpretive Frameworks
- Part III Technology and Mobility
- Part IV Shared Practices
- Part V Shared and Distinct Iconographies
- Part VI Shared Forms, Distinct Functions
- 15 Forms and Functions of Beds and Couches in Etruscan and Anatolian Tombs
- 16 Female Assembly on Archaic Etruscan and Anatolian Funerary Monuments
- 17 Anatolian Fashion in Etruscan Clothing
- 18 Male Necklaces in the East and West
- Index
- References
17 - Anatolian Fashion in Etruscan Clothing
The Case of the Pointed Shoes
from Part VI - Shared Forms, Distinct Functions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 March 2023
Book contents
- Etruria and Anatolia
- Mediterranean Studies in Antiquity
- Etruria and Anatolia
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Maps and Figures
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Notes on Abbreviations and Spelling
- Introduction
- Part I Broadening Perspectives
- Part II Interpretive Frameworks
- Part III Technology and Mobility
- Part IV Shared Practices
- Part V Shared and Distinct Iconographies
- Part VI Shared Forms, Distinct Functions
- 15 Forms and Functions of Beds and Couches in Etruscan and Anatolian Tombs
- 16 Female Assembly on Archaic Etruscan and Anatolian Funerary Monuments
- 17 Anatolian Fashion in Etruscan Clothing
- 18 Male Necklaces in the East and West
- Index
- References
Summary
Similarities in the imagery of Etruscan and Western Anatolian dress fashions, such as pointed shoes and Ionic chitons, indicate an obvious connection between the clothing systems of the two cultures. Indeed, Larissa Bonfante (2003) in her groundbreaking book Etruscan Dress classifies an “Ionian Phase” (550–475 BCE) in the development of the Etruscan clothing system. This chapter investigates the adaptation of Ionian dress items into the Etruscan dress repertoire through a comparative iconographic study of dress fashions in western Anatolia and Etruscan funerary art of the sixth and fifth centuries BCE. After an overview of prevailing dress fashions in both cultures, it explores the specific case of shoes with upturned toes (Etruscan/Hittite shoes, as they are commonly known) to show the changing meanings and cultural connections the adopted dress items conveyed.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Etruria and AnatoliaMaterial Connections and Artistic Exchange, pp. 303 - 317Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Works Cited
Bammer, A., and Muss, U. 1996. Das Artemision von Ephesos: das Weltwunder Ioniens in archaischer und klassischer Zeit. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Barber, E. W. 1994. Women’s Work: The First 20,000 Years: Women, Cloth, and Society in Early Times. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Baughan, E. P. 2010. “Persian Riders in Lydia? The Painted Frieze of the Aktepe Tomb Kline,” in Proceedings of the XVIIth International Congress of Classical Archaeology, 22–26 September 2008. Rome: Bollettino di Archeologia, Online 1, Volume special G/G1/3: 24–36.Google Scholar
Baughan, E. P. 2013. Couched in Death: Klinai and Identity in Anatolia and Beyond. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bellinger, L. 1962. “Textiles from Gordion,” The Bulletin of the Needle and Bobbin Club 46: 5–33.Google Scholar
Benda-Weber, I. 2005. Lykier und Karer. Zwei auctochthone Ethnien Kleinasien zwischen Orient und Okzident, Asia Minor Studien 56. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GMBH.Google Scholar
Bonfante, L. (ed.) 1986. Etruscan Life and Afterlife: A Handbook of Etruscan Studies. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Burke, B. 2005. “Textile Production at Gordion and the Phrygian Economy,” in The Archaeology of Midas and the Phrygians: Recent Work at Gordion, ed. Kealhofer, L., 69–81. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum.Google Scholar
Clamer, C. A. 1985. “Middle Bronze Age Pottery Boot from Tel Lachish,” in Palestine in the Bronze and Iron Ages: Papers in Honour of Olga Tufnell, ed. Tubb, J. N., 50–56. London: Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Cole, S. G. 2004. Landscapes, Gender, and Ritual Space: The Ancient Greek Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F. 1963. Die Hethitische Keramik von Boğazköy, Boğazköy-Hattuşa, Vol. 4, Wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 75: 143–173. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. 2013. “Ancient Greek Prostitutes and the Textile Industry in Attic Vase-Painting ca. 550–450 B.C.E.,” Classical World 106: 219–259.Google Scholar
Greaves, A. M. 2010. The Land of Ionia: Society and Economy in the Archaic Period. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Greenewalt, C. H., and Majewski, L. J. 1980. “Lydian Textiles,” in From Athens to Gordion: The Papers of a Memorial Symposium for Rodney S. Young Held at the University Museum the Third of May, 1975, ed. DeVries, K., 133–147. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum.Google Scholar
Günther, W. 1988. “‘Vieuxat inutilisable’ dans un inventaire inedit de Milet,” in Comptes et inventaires dans la cité grecque. Actes du colloque international d’epigraphie tenu à Neuchâtel du 23 au 26 septembre 1986 en l’honneur de Jacques Tréheux, ed. Knoepfler, D. and Quellet, N., 217–237. Geneva: Faculté des Lettres.Google Scholar
Haentjens, A. M. E. 2002. “Ritual Shoes in Early Greek Female Graves,” L’Antiquité Classique 71: 171–184.Google Scholar
Hermans, R. 2012. “Juno Sospita: Foreign Goddess through Roman Eyes,” in Processes of Integration and Identity Formation in the Roman Republic, ed. Roselaar, S. T., 327–336. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Jenkins, I. 2006. Greek Architecture and Its Sculpture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kuru, S., and Paksoy, C. 2011. “Anadolu’da Ayakkabı Ve Cumhuri̇yet Dönemi Ayakkabı Kültürü,” ICANAS (Uluslararası Asya ve Kuzey Afrika Çalışmaları Kongresi) 38: 821–837.Google Scholar
Llewellyn-Jones, L. 2003. Aphrodite’s Tortoise: The Veiled Woman of Ancient Greece. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Mellink, M. J. 1973. “Excavations at Karataş-Semayük and Elmali, Lycia, 1972,” American Journal of Archaeology 77: 293–307.Google Scholar
Miller, M. C. 1997. Athens and Persia in the Fifth Century BC: A Study in Cultural Receptivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, M. C. 1999. “Reexamining Transvestism in Archaic and Classical Athens: The Zewadski Stamnos,” American Journal of Archaeology 103: 223–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. C. 2013. “Clothes and Identity: The Case of the Greeks in Ionia c. 400 BC,” Antichthon 47: 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. G. 2010. “Two Painted Chamber Tombs of Northern Lycia at Kızılbel and Karaburun,” in Tatarlı: Renklerin Dönüş/The Return of Colours, ed. Summerer, L. and von Kienlin, A., 318–329. Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Özgen, İ., Öztürk, J., and Mellink, M. J. 1996. The Lydian Treasure: Heritage Recovered. Istanbul: Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Culture, General Directorate of Monuments and Museums.Google Scholar
Richard, E. 1981. “Gordion Textiles,” in Three Great Early Tumuli. The Gordion Excavation Final Reports 1, ed. Young, R. S., 294–310. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum.Google Scholar
Romano, I. B. 1995. The Terracotta Figurines and Related Vessels. Gordion Special Studies, Vol. 2. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum.Google Scholar
Root, M. C. 2007. “Reading Persepolis in Greek: Gifts of the Yauna,” in Persian Responses: Political and Cultural Interaction with (in) the Achaemenid Empire, ed. Tuplin, C., 117–224. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. F. 1953. Persepolis I: Structures, Reliefs, and Inscriptions, The University of Chicago Oriental Institute Publications, Vol. 68. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steingräber, S. 2006. Abundance of Life: Etruscan Wall Painting. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
Şare, T. 2010. “An Archaic Ivory Figurine from a Tumulus near Elmalı: Cultural Hybridization and a New Anatolian Style,” Hesperia 79: 53–78.Google Scholar
Şare, T. 2013. “The Sculpture of the Heroon of Perikle at Limyra: The Making of a Lycian King,” Anatolian Studies 63: 55–74.Google Scholar
Şare, T. 2014. “Arakhne’s Loom: Luxurious Textile Production in Ancient Western Anatolia,” Olba 22: 251–280.Google Scholar
Şare, T. 2015. “Antik Anadolu Sanatının Etnik Kategoriler Ve Batı-Doğu Arasında Sıkışmışlığı Üzerine,” in Changing Archaeology: Proceedings of the 1st Tag-Turkey Meeting, 9–10 Mayıs 2013, ed. Çilingiroğlu, Ç. and Özgüner, N. P., 191–197. Izmir: Ege Yayınları.Google Scholar
Tuplin, C. 2011. “The Limits of Persianization: Some Reflections on Cultural Links in the Persian Empire,” in Cultural Identity and the Peoples of the Ancient Mediterranean, ed. Gruen, E., 150–182. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute.Google Scholar
Turfa, J. M. 1986. “International Contacts: Commerce, Trade, and Foreign Affairs,” in Bonfante (ed.), 66–91.Google Scholar