Book contents
- MacIntyre’s After Virtue at 40
- Cambridge Philosophical Anniversaries
- MacIntyre’s After Virtue at 40
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I After Virtue and Ethical Theory
- Part II After Virtue and Political Theory
- Part III After Virtue and Narrative
- Part IV After Virtue beyond Philosophy
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 October 2023
Edited by
Book contents
- MacIntyre’s After Virtue at 40
- Cambridge Philosophical Anniversaries
- MacIntyre’s After Virtue at 40
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I After Virtue and Ethical Theory
- Part II After Virtue and Political Theory
- Part III After Virtue and Narrative
- Part IV After Virtue beyond Philosophy
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- MacIntyre's After Virtue at 40 , pp. 258 - 275Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Adams, R. M. 2006. A Theory of Virtue: Excellence in Being for the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Adkins, A. 1960. Merit and Responsibility: A Study in Greek Values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ahmari, S. et al. 2019. ‘Against the Dead Consensus’, First Things, 21 March. Available at: www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2019/03/against-the-dead-consensus.Google Scholar
Akrivou, K. and Sison, A. J. G. 2016. The Challenges of Capitalism for Virtue Ethics and the Common Good. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
Albertson, D. and Blakely, J. 2021. ‘From Here to Utopia: What Religion Can Teach the Left’, Commonweal 148 (6): 20–3.Google Scholar
Angier, T. 2017. ‘Book Review: Alasdair MacIntyre, Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity’, Religious Studies 53 (3): 419–27.Google Scholar
Angier, T. 2018b. ‘Aristotle and the Charge of Egoism’, Journal of Value Inquiry 52: 457–75.Google Scholar
Angier, T. 2020. ‘Happiness as Subjective Well-Being: An Aristotelian Critique’, Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 76 (1): 59–90.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1963. Intention, 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981. Ethics, Religion and Politics: Collected Philosophical Papers, vol. 3. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1984b. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Barnes, J. (ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, 2011. Nicomachean Ethics. Bartlett, R. and Collins, S. (trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, 2014. Nicomachean Ethics. C. D. C. Reeve (trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. 2003. ‘Liberal Neutrality on the Good: An Autopsy’, in Wall, S. and Klosko, G. (eds), Perfectionism and Neutrality. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 192–218.Google Scholar
Avineri, S. 1968. The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1950. ‘Jean-Paul Sartre’s Doctrine of Commitment’, Listener 44 (1135): 633–4.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1952. ‘Critique of Ethics and Theology’, in Language, Truth, and Logic. Garden City, NY: Dover Publications, pp. 102–20.Google Scholar
Baril, A. 2013. ‘The Role of Welfare in Eudaimonism’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (4): 511–35.Google Scholar
Baron, M. 2011. ‘Virtue Ethics in Relation to Kantian Ethics: An Opinionated Overview and Commentary’, in Jost, L. and Wuerth, J. (eds), Perfecting Virtue: New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 8–37.Google Scholar
Beabout, G. 2012. ‘Management as a Domain-Related Practice That Requires and Develops Practical Wisdom’, Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2): 405–32.Google Scholar
Beabout, G. 2020. ‘MacIntyre and Business Ethics’, in Beadle, R. and Moore, G. (eds), Learning from MacIntyre. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications, pp. 209–34.Google Scholar
Beadle, R. 2008. ‘Why Business Cannot Be a Practice’, in Knight, K. and Blackledge, P. (eds), Revolutionary Aristotelianism: Ethics, Resistance and Utopia. Stuttgart: Lucius and Lucius, pp. 229–41.Google Scholar
Beadle, R. 2017. ‘MacIntyre’s Influence on Business Ethics’, in Sison, A. J. G., Beabout, G. R. and Ferrero, I. (eds), Springer Handbook of Virtue in Business and Management. New York: Springer, pp. 59–67.Google Scholar
Beadle, R. and Moore, G. 2006. ‘MacIntyre on Virtue and Organization’, Organization Studies 27: 323–40.Google Scholar
Beier, K. 2020. ‘Virtue and Tradition: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Thomistic–Aristotelian Naturalism’, in Hähnel, M. (ed.), Aristotelian Naturalism: A Research Companion. Berlin: Springer Nature, pp. 209–22.Google Scholar
Beiner, R. 2013. ‘The Parochial and the Universal: MacIntyre’s Idea of the University’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 264 (2): 169–82.Google Scholar
Beiner, R. 2014. Political Philosophy: What It Is and Why It Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bellah, R. et al. 1996. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life, 2nd edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. 1984. ‘Nietzsche or Aristotle? Reflections on Alasdair MacIntyre’s After Virtue’, Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 67 (1): 6–29.Google Scholar
Berry, W. 2012. It All Turns on Affection: The Jefferson Lecture & Other Essays. Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint.Google Scholar
Bevir, M. 2011. The Making of British Socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Blackledge, P. 2007. ‘Review L. Boltanski and E. Chiapello “The New Spirit of Capitalism”’, Capital and Class 92: 198–201.Google Scholar
Blackledge, P. 2009. ‘Alasdair MacIntyre: Social Practices, Marxism and Ethical Anti-capitalism’, Political Studies 57 (4): 866–84.Google Scholar
Blackledge, P. 2014. ‘Alasdair MacIntyre as a Marxist and as a Critic of Marxism’, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 88 (4): 705–24.Google Scholar
Blackledge, P. 2019a. ‘Historical Materialism’, in Vidal, M. et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Karl Marx. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 37–56.Google Scholar
Blackledge, P. 2019b. Friedrich Engels’s Contribution to Social and Political Theory. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Blackledge, P. 2020. ‘Alasdair MacIntyre’s Aristotelianism’, in Bielskis, A., Leontsini, E. and Knight, K. (eds), Virtue Ethics and Contemporary Aristotelianism. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 220–35.Google Scholar
Blackledge, P. and Davidson, N. D. 2008. Alasdair MacIntyre’s Engagement with Marxism: Selected Writings 1953–1974. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Blackledge, P. and Knight, K. 2011a. Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Blackledge, P. and Knight, K. 2011b. ‘Introduction: Towards a Virtuous Politics’, in Blackledge, P. and Knight, K. (eds), Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
Blakely, J. 2013. ‘The Forgotten MacIntyre: Beyond Value Neutrality in the Social Sciences’, Polity 45 (3): 445–63.Google Scholar
Blakely, J. 2016. Alasdair MacIntyre, Charles Taylor, and the Demise of Naturalism. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Blakely, J. 2017. ‘Does Liberalism Lack Virtue? A Critique of Alasdair MacIntyre’s Reactionary Politics’, Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy 44 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Blakley, J. 2020a. We Built Reality: How Social Science Infiltrated Politics, Culture, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blakely, J. 2020b. ‘MacIntyre contra MacIntyre: Interpretive Philosophy and Aristotle’, The Review of Metaphysics 74 (1): 121–42.Google Scholar
Breen, K. 2012. Under Weber’s Shadow: Modernity, Subjectivity, and Politics in Habermas, Arendt, and MacIntyre. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Brown, W. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Burke, E. 1999 [1770]. Thoughts on the Present Discontents, in Select Works of Edmund Burke, vol. 1. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Burke, E. 1999 [1790]. Reflections on the Revolution in France, in Select Works of Edmund Burke, vol. 2. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Burns, T. 2011. ‘Revolutionary Aristotelianism?’, in Blackledge, P. and Knight, K. (eds), Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 35–53.Google Scholar
Butler, A. 1903. The Lives of the Fathers, Martyrs, and Principal Saints (complete and unabridged), 4 vols. New York: P. J. Kennedy.Google Scholar
Butler, J. 2017. Fifteen Sermons and Other Writings on Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Callinicos, A. 2011. ‘Two Cheers for Enlightenment Universalism: Or, Why It’s Hard to Be an Aristotelian Revolutionary’, in Blackledge, P. and Knight, K. (eds), Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 54–78.Google Scholar
Cavell, S. 1971. The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cavell, S. 1981. Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, T. 2014. Knowing What to Do: Imagination, Virtue, and Platonism in Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. 1991. Marx, Marginalism and Modern Sociology: From Adam Smith and Max Weber. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. G. and Simpson, E. 1989. Anti-theory in Ethics and Moral Conservatism. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2013. Finding Oneself in the Other. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. 1994. ‘MacIntyre and Aquinas’, in Horton, J. and Mendus, S. (eds), After MacIntyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 65–90.Google Scholar
Conly, S. 1988. ‘Flourishing and the Failure of the Ethics of Virtue’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 13 (1): 83–96.Google Scholar
Copp, D. and Sobel, D. 2004. ‘Morality and Virtue: An Assessment of Some Recent Work in Virtue Ethics’, Ethics 114 (3): 514–54.Google Scholar
Cunningham, L. 2009. Intractable Disputes about the Natural Law: Alasdair MacIntyre and His Critics. Noter Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
D’Andrea, T. 2006. Tradition, Rationality, and Virtue: The Thought of Alasdair MacIntyre. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Danford, A. 1998. ‘Work Organisation Inside Japanese Firms in South Wales’, in Thompson, P. and Warhurst, C. (eds), Workplaces of the Future. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 40–64.Google Scholar
Deneen, P. 2016. Conserving America? Essays on Present Discontents. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
Deneen, P. 2018b. ‘Corporate Progressivism’, First Things, 18 November. Available at: www.firstthings.com/article/2018/11/corporate-progressivism.Google Scholar
Dreher, R. 2017. The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post-Christian Nation. New York: Sentinel.Google Scholar
Driver, J. 1998. ‘The Virtues and Human Nature’, in Crisp, R. (ed.) How Should One Live? Essays on the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 111–30.Google Scholar
Duff, A. 2021. ‘The Problem of Rule in MacIntyre’s Politics and Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity’, Politics and Poetics 4: 23–41.Google Scholar
Dupré, L. 1995. Passage to Modernity: An Essay on the Hermeneutics of Nature and Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1994. Life’s Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E. 2015. ‘On Happiness and Time’, in Rabbas, Ø., Emilsson, E. K., Fossheim, H. and Tuominen, M. (eds), The Quest for the Good Life: Ancient Philosophers on Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 222–40.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency 1998. ‘Mack Trucks Diesel Engine Settlement’. Available at: www.epa.gov/enforcement/mack-trucks-diesel-engine-settlement.Google Scholar
Farrelly, C. and Solum, L. 2008. Virtue Jurisprudence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ferrero, I. and Sison, A. J. G. 2014. ‘A Quantitative Analysis of Authors, Schools and Themes in Virtue Ethics Articles in Business Ethics and Management Journals’, Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (4): 375–400.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 1998. Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011a. ‘Reason, Authority, and Friendship’, in Reason in Action, Collected Essays, vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 104–24.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2011b. ‘On Hart’s Ways: Law as Reason and as Fact’, in Philosophy of Law, Collected Essays, vol. IV. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 230–56.Google Scholar
Foot, P. 1978. Virtues and Vices: And Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frazer, E. and Lacey, N. 1994. ‘MacIntyre, Feminism, and the Concept of Practice’, in Horton, J. and Mendus, S. (eds), After MacIntyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 265–82.Google Scholar
Frey, J. A. 2018. ‘How to Be an Ethical Naturalist’, in Hacker-Wright, J. (ed.), Philippa Foot on Goodness and Virtue. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 47–84.Google Scholar
Freytag, M. 1994. ‘MacIntyre’s Conservatism and Its Cure: The Formal Structure of Traditions’, Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1 (2): 1–10.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1970. ‘The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits’, New York Times, 13 September. www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.html.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. 2003. ‘Liberal Neutrality: A Compelling and Radical Principle’, in Wall, S. and Klosko, G. (eds), Perfectionism and Neutrality. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 138–65.Google Scholar
Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. 1946. ‘Introduction: The Man and His Work’, in Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. (eds), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (trans. H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–74.Google Scholar
Goldie, P. 2012. The Mess Inside: Narrative, Emotion, and the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gottfried, P. 1999. After Liberalism: Mass Democracy in the Managerial State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gregson, J. 2019. Marxism, Ethics and Politics: The Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. 2011. ‘Kantian Perfectionism’, in Jost, L. and Wuerth, J. (eds), Perfecting Virtue: New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 194–214.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. 1994. ‘MacIntyre’s Thomist Revival: What Next?’, in Horton, J. and Mendus, S. (eds), After MacIntyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 91–107.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., Jay, J. and Madison, J. 2001 [1787–1788]. The Federalist, Gideon edition. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hart, D. B. 2022. Tradition and Apocalypse: An Essay on the Future of Religious Belief. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1958. ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’, Harvard Law Review 71 (4): 593–629.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1994. The Concept of Law, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, S. 1978. Truthfulness and Tragedy. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, S. 1981. Community of Character. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, S. 2007. ‘The Virtues of Alasdair MacIntyre’, First Things, October. Available at: www.firstthings.com/article/2007/10/the-virtues-of-alasdair-MacIntyre.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, S. 2010. Hannah’s Child: A Theologian’s Memoir. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, S. 2022. ‘God and Alasdair MacIntyre’, in Fully Alive: The Apocalyptic Humanism of Karl Barth. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, pp. 81–99.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, S. and MacIntyre, A. C. 1983. Revisions: Changing Perspectives in Moral Philosophy. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. 1957. The Liberal Temper in Greek Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Herdt, J. A. 1998. ‘Alasdair MacIntyre’s “Rationality of Traditions” and Tradition-Transcendental Standards of Justification’, The Journal of Religion 78: 524–46.Google Scholar
Herdt, J. A. 2018. ‘Book Review: Alasdair MacIntyre, Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity’, Studies in Christian Ethics 31 (4): 488–92.Google Scholar
Herdt, J. A. 2022. Assuming Responsibility: Ecstatic Eudaimonism and the Call to Live Well. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, B. 2011. ‘The Difference That Ends Make’, in Jost, L. and Wuerth, J. (eds), Perfecting Virtue: New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 92–115.Google Scholar
Hibbs, T. 2004. ‘MacIntyre, Aquinas, and Politics’, The Review of Politics 66 (3): 357–83.Google Scholar
Hittinger, R. 1989. ‘After MacIntyre: Natural Law Theory, Virtue Ethics, and Eudaimonia’, International Philosophical Quarterly 29 (4): 449–61.Google Scholar
Holmes, S. 1993. The Anatomy of Antiliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hörcher, F. 2020. A Political Philosophy of Conservatism: Prudence, Moderation and Tradition. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Horton, J. and Mendus, S. 1994a. ‘Alasdair MacIntyre: After Virtue and After’, in Horton, J. and Mendus, S. (eds), After MacIntyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Horton, J. and Mendus, S. 1994b. After MacIntyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1975 [1751]. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, in Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, 3rd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 2007. A Treatise of Human Nature: A Critical Edition, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, R. 2012. ‘Human Nature and Virtue Ethics’, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 70: 169–88.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. 1989. ‘Tradition and Reason in the History of Ethics’, Social Philosophy and Policy 7 (1): 45–68.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. 2007–2009. The Development of Ethics, 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. 2016. ‘An American Utopia’, in Zizek, S. (ed.), An American Utopia: Dual Power and the Universal Army. London: Verso, pp. 1–96.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 2017. The Metaphysics of Morals (revised edition, trans. M. Gregor). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, W. 1967. ‘Editor’s Introduction’, in Nietzsche, F., On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo. New York: Random House, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, W. 1974. Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist, 4th edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. J. Jr 2020. ‘MacIntyre and Law’, in Beadle, R. and Moore, G. (eds), Learning from MacIntyre. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications, pp. 280–303.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1949. General Theory of Law and State (trans. A. Wedberg). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, J. 2012. ‘The Stoics’, in Angier, T. (ed.), Ethics: The Key Thinkers. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 57–82.Google Scholar
Knight, K. 1998b. ‘Introduction’, in Knight, K. (ed.), The MacIntyre Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Knight, K. 2007. Aristotelian Philosophy: Ethics and Politics from Aristotle to MacIntyre. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Knight, K. 2008. ‘Practices: The Aristotelian Concept’, Analyse & Kritik 30 (2): 317–29.Google Scholar
Knight, K. 2011a. ‘What’s the Good of Post-Analytic Philosophy?’, History of European Ideas 37 (3): 304–14.Google Scholar
Knight, K. 2011b. ‘Revolutionary Aristotelianism’, in Blackledge, P. and Knight, K. (eds), Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 20–34.Google Scholar
Knight, K. 2013. ‘Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revisionary Aristotelianism: Pragmatism Opposed, Marxism Outmoded, Thomism Transformed’, in O’Rourke, F. (ed.), What Happened in and to Moral Philosophy in the Twentieth Century? Philosophical Essays in Honor of Alasdair MacIntyre. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 83–121.Google Scholar
Knight, K. 2017. ‘MacIntyre’s Critique of Management’, in Sison, A. J. G., Beabout, G. R. and Ferrero, I. (eds), Springer Handbook of Virtue in Business and Management. New York: Springer, pp. 79–87.Google Scholar
Knight, K. 2019. ‘Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Peripateticism’, in Trepanier, L. and Havers, G. (eds.), Walk Away: When the Political Left Turns Right. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Koƚakowski, L. 1978. Main Currents in Marxism, vol. 3 (trans. P. S. Falla). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kolozi, P. 2017. Conservatives against Capitalism: From the Industrial Revolution to Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 1996. The Sources of Normativity (Tanner Lectures 1992). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Larmore, C. 1987. Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lear, G. R. 2015. ‘Aristotle on Happiness and Long Life’, in Rabbas, Ø., Emilsson, E. K., Fossheim, H. and Tuominen, M. (eds), The Quest for the Good Life: Ancient Philosophers on Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 127–45.Google Scholar
Lemos, J. 1997. ‘Virtue, Happiness, and Intelligibility’, Journal of Philosophical Research 22: 307–20.Google Scholar
Lilla, M. 2016. The Shipwrecked Mind: On Political Reaction. New York: New York Review of Books.Google Scholar
Lilla, M. 2018. ‘Two Roads for the New French Right’, The New York Review of Books, 65 (20): 42.Google Scholar
Lipscomb, B. J. B. 2022. The Women Are Up to Something: How Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch Revolutionized Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lomasky, L. 2002. ‘Classical Liberalism and Civil Society’, in Chambers, S. and Kymlicka, W. (eds), Alternative Conceptions of Civil Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 50–70.Google Scholar
Lott, M. 2012. ‘Moral Virtue as Knowledge of Human Form’, Social Theory and Practice 38 (3): 407–31.Google Scholar
Lott, M. 2016. ‘Constructing a Good Life’, Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (3): 363–75.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. S. 2004. Tradition in the Ethics of Alasdair MacIntyre: Relativism, Thomism, and Philosophy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. S. 2012. Reading Alasdair MacIntyre’s After Virtue. London: Continuum Publishing.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. S. 2014. ‘MacIntyre Overview’, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 30 April. Available at: https://iep.utm.edu/mac-over/.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. S. 2018. ‘Alasdair MacIntyre’s Ethics of Practical Reasoning’, Politics and Poetics 4: 349640.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. S. 2019. ‘Narrative and the Rationality of Traditions: MacIntyre’s Epistemological Stance’, Acta Philosophica 28 (2): 205–24.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. S. 2020. ‘Alasdair MacIntyre: An Intellectual Biography’, in Beadle, R. and Moore, G. (eds), Learning from MacIntyre. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N. 1978. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1951a. ‘Analogy in Metaphysics’, Downside Review 69 [1] (215): 45–61.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1951b. The Significance of Moral Judgements. Being a Thesis presented for the Degree of M. A. in the University of Manchester under Ordinance II (A) in April 1951. Unpublished.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1962. ‘A Mistake about Causality in Social Science’, in Laslett, P. and Runciman, W. G. (eds), Philosophy, Politics and Society, 2nd series. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 48–70.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1965b. ‘Imperatives, Reasons for Action, and Morals’, Journal of Philosophy 62 (19): 513–14.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1966. A Short History of Ethics: A History of Moral Philosophy from the Homeric Age to the Twentieth Century. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1969a. ‘Philosophy and Sanity: Nietzsche’s Titanism’, Encounter 32 (4): 79–82.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1969b. ‘Atheism and Morals’, in MacIntyre, A. and Ricoeur, P. (eds), The Religious Significance of Atheism. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 31–55.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1971. ‘The Idea of a Social Science’, in Against the Self-Images of the Age. London: Duckworth, pp. 211–29.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1972. ‘Modern German Thought’, in Pasley, M. (ed.), Germany: A Companion to German Studies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1973. ‘Ideology, Social Science, and Revolution’, Comparative Politics 5 (3): 321–42.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1977a. ‘Epistemological Crises, Dramatic Narrative and the Philosophy of Science’, The Monist 60: 453–72.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1977b. ‘Can Medicine Dispense with a Theological Perspective on Human Nature?’, in Engelhardt, H. T. and Callahan, D. (eds), Knowledge, Value and Belief. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: Hastings Center, pp. 25–43.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1978a. Against the Self-Images of the Age: Essays on Ideology and Philosophy. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1978b. ‘What Morality Is Not’, Philosophy 32: 325–35. Reprinted in Against the Self-Images of the Age: Essays on Ideology and Philosophy. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 96–108.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1978c. ‘Objectivity in Morality and Objectivity in Science’, in Engelhardt, H. T. and Callahan, D. (eds), Morals, Science and Sociality. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: Hastings Center, pp. 21–39.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1980. ‘Regulation: A Substitute for Morality’, The Hastings Center Report 10 (1): 31–3.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1984. After Virtue, 2nd edition. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1986. ‘The Intelligibility of Action’, in Margolis, J., Krausz, M. and Burian, R. M. (eds), Rationality, Relativism and the Human Sciences. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 63–80.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1990. Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry: Encyclopaedia, Genealogy, and Tradition. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1991. ‘An Interview for Cogito’, in Knight, K. (ed.), The MacIntyre Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 267–75.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1994a. ‘An Interview with Giovanna Borrado’, in Knight, K. (ed.), The MacIntyre Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 253–66.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1994b. ‘The Theses on Feuerbach: A Road Not Taken’, in Knight, K. (ed.), The MacIntyre Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 221–34.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1994c. ‘My Station and Its Virtues’, Journal of Philosophical Research 19: 1–8.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1994d. ‘A Partial Response to My Critics’, in Horton, J. and Mendus, S. (eds), After MacIntyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 283–304.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1995a. ‘Some Enlightenment Projects Reconsidered’, in Ethics and Politics: Selected Essays, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [2006], pp. 172–85.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1995b. ‘Three Perspectives on Marxism: 1953, 1968, 1995’, in Ethics and Politics: Selected Essays, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [2006], pp. 145–58.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1995c. ‘Natural Law as Subversive: The Case of Aquinas’, in Ethics and Politics: Selected Essays, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [2006], pp. 41–63.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1996. ‘An Interview with Alasdair MacIntyre’ [Interview with Thomas D. Pearson], Kinesis 20: 34–47. Reprinted in Kinesis 23: 40–50.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1997. ‘Natural Law Reconsidered’, International Philosophical Quarterly 37 (1): 95–9.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1998a. ‘Social Science Methodology as the Ideology of Bureaucratic Authority’, in Knight, K. (ed.), The MacIntyre Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 53–68.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1998b. ‘Politics, Philosophy and Common Good’, in Knight, K. (ed.), The MacIntyre Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 235–52.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1998c. ‘Plain Persons and Moral Philosophy: Rules, Virtues and Goods’, in Knight, K. (ed.), The MacIntyre Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 136–52.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1998d. ‘Moral Relativism, Truth, and Justification’, in Knight, K. (ed.), The MacIntyre Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 202–22.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1998e. ‘Notes from the Moral Wilderness’, in Knight, K. (ed.), The MacIntyre Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 31–52.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1998f. ‘Practical Rationalities as Forms of Social Structure’, in Knight, K. (ed.), The MacIntyre Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 120–35.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1998g. ‘The Theses on Feuerbach’, in Knight, K. (ed.), The MacIntyre Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 223–34.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1999a. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 1999b. ‘Toleration and the Goods of Conflict’, in Ethics and Politics: Selected Essays, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [2006], pp. 205–223.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2004. ‘Questions for Confucians’, in Shun, K. and Wong, D. (eds), Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy and Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 203–18.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2006a. Ethics and Politics: Selected Essays, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2006b. ‘Preface’, in Ethics and Politics: Selected Essays, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. vii–xi.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2006c. ‘Epistemological Crises, Dramatic Narrative and the Philosophy of Science’, in The Tasks of Philosophy: Selected Essays, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2006d. First Principles, Final Ends, and Contemporary Moral Issues (The Aquinas Lecture 1990). Marquette, WI: Marquette University Press. Reprinted in The Tasks of Philosophy: Selected Essays, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 143–78.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2006e. The Tasks of Philosophy: Selected Essays, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2006f. ‘Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Social Practice’, in Tasks of Philosophy: Selected Essays, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 104–22.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2006g. ‘Social Structures and Their Threats to Moral Agency’, in Ethics and Politics: Selected Essays, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 186–204.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2006h. ‘Outside Ethics’, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 5 March. Available at: https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/outside-ethics.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2007. After Virtue, 3rd edition. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2008a. ‘What More Needs to Be Said? A Beginning, although Only a Beginning, at Saying It’, Analyse & Kritik 30: 261–76.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2008b. ‘Prediction and Politics’, in Blackledge, P. and Davidson, N. D. (eds), Alasdair MacIntyre’s Engagement with Marxism: Selected Writings 1953–1974. Leiden: Brill, pp. 249–61.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2008c. ‘Communism and British Intellectuals’, in Blackledge, P. and Davidson, N. D. (eds), Alasdair MacIntyre’s Engagement with Marxism: Selected Writings 1953–1974. Leiden: Brill, pp. 115–22.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2009a. God, Philosophy, Universities: A Selective History of the Catholic Philosophical Tradition. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2009b. ‘Common Goods and Political Reasoning’, unpublished document, CASEP, London Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2009c. ‘Intractable Moral Disagreements’, in Cunningham, L. (ed.), Intractable Disputes about the Natural Law: Alasdair MacIntyre and His Critics. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2010a. ‘Five Answers to Two Questions’, unpublished document, CASEP, London Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2010b. ‘Review of: G. A. Cohen, Why Not Socialism?’, Ethics 120 (2): 393–4.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2010c. ‘On Being a Theistic Philosopher in a Secularized Culture’, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84: 23–32.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2011a. ‘How Aristotelianism Can Become Revolutionary: Ethics, Resistance, and Utopia’, in Blackledge, P. and Knight, K. (eds), Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2011b. ‘Where We Were, Where We Are, Where We Need to Be’, in Blackledge, P. and Knight, K. (eds), Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 307–34.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2012. ‘Practical Rationality and Irrationality and Their Social Settings’, unpublished paper presented to CASEP, London Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2013a. ‘Epilogue: What Next?’, in O’Rourke, F. (ed.), What Happened in and To Moral Philosophy in the Twentieth Century? Philosophical Essays in Honor of Alasdair MacIntyre. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 474–8.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2013b. ‘Replies’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 264 (2): 201–20.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2013c. ‘On Having Survived the Academic Moral Philosophy of the Twentieth Century’, in O’Rourke, F. (ed.), What Happened in and To Moral Philosophy in the Twentieth Century? Philosophical Essays in Honor of Alasdair MacIntyre. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 17–34.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2014. ‘Ends and Endings’, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 88 (4): 807–21.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2015. ‘The Irrelevance of Ethics’, in Bielskis, A. and Knight, K. (eds), Virtue and Economy: Essays on Morality and Markets. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 7–22.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2016. Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity: An Essay on Desire, Practical Reasoning, and Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2020. ‘Four – or More? – Political Aristotles’, in Bielskis, A., Leontsini, E. and Knight, K. (eds), Virtue Ethics and Contemporary Aristotelianism: Modernity, Conflict and Politics. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. C. 2021. ‘Human Dignity: A Puzzling and Possibly Dangerous Idea?’ Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=V727AcOoogQ.Google Scholar
Mansfield, H. 2010. Tocqueville: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maritain, J. 1970. Three Reformers: Luther, Descartes, Rousseau. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1959. The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 (trans. M. Milligan). Moscow: Progress Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1969. The Theses on Feuerbach (trans. W. Lough), in Marx/Engels Selected Works, vol. 1. Moscow: Progress Publishers, pp. 13–15. Available at: www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/theses.htm.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1975a. ‘Theses on Feuerbach’, in Early Writings. London: Penguin Books, pp. 421–3.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1975b. ‘Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts’, in Early Writings. London: Penguin Books, pp. 279–400.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F. 1975. ‘The Holy Family’, in Marx and Engels Collected Works, vol. 4. London: Lawrence and Wishart, pp. 3–211.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F. 1978. ‘Manifesto of the Communist Party’, in Tucker, R. (ed.), The Marx–Engels Reader. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, pp. 469–500.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F. 2000 [1848]. The Communist Manifesto, in McLellan, D. (ed.), Karl Marx: Selected Writings, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. 2013. ‘The Psychological Self as Actor, Agent, and Author’, Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3): 272–95.Google Scholar
McMylor, P. M. 2011. ‘Compartmentalisation and Social Roles: MacIntyre’s Critical Theory of Modernity’, in Blackledge, P. and Knight, K. (eds), Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 228–40.Google Scholar
McPherson, D. 2017. ‘Traditional Morality and Sacred Values’, Analyse & Kritik 39 (1): 41–62.Google Scholar
McPherson, D. 2020. Virtue and Meaning: A Neo-Aristotelian Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mendham, M. 2007. ‘Eudaimonia and Agape in MacIntyre and Kierkegaard’s “Works of Love”: Beginning Unpolemical Inquiry’, Journal of Religious Ethics 35 (4): 591–625.Google Scholar
Michéa, J.-C. 2007. L’Empire du Moindre Mal: Essai sur la Civilisation Libérale. Paris: Climats.Google Scholar
Milbank, J. 2006. Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Milbank, J. and Pabst, A. 2016. The Politics of Virtue. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1989. On Liberty and Other Writings (ed. Collini, S.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Misak, C. 2000. Truth, Politics, Morality: Pragmatism and Deliberation. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, G. 2002. ‘On the Implications of the Practice–Institution Distinction’, Business Ethics Quarterly 12: 19–32.Google Scholar
Moore, G. and Beadle, R. 2006. ‘In Search of Organizational Virtue in Business’, Organization Studies 27: 369–89.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1993. Principia Ethica, revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, J. 1983. Japanese Workers and the Struggle for Power. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Moran, R. 2015. The Story of My Life: Narrative and Self-Understanding. Marquette, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Mulhall, S. 2013. The Self and Its Shadows: A Book of Essays on Individuality as Negation in Philosophy and the Arts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mulhall, S. 2021. The Ascetic Ideal: Genealogies of Life-Denial in Religion, Morality, Art, Science and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mulhall, S. and Swift, A. 1996. Liberals and Communitarians, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Müller, J. 2018. ‘Practical and Productive Thinking in Aristotle’, Phronesis 63 (2): 148–75.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. 2020. Your Whole Life: Beyond Childhood and Adulthood. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. C. 2003b. ‘MacIntyre’s Political Philosophy’, in Murphy, M. C. (ed.), Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–75.Google Scholar
Nicholas, J. 2018. ‘Geoff Moore, Virtue at Work’, Philosophy of Management 17 (2): 257–9.Google Scholar
Nicholas, J. L. 2021. Love and Politics: Persistent Human Desires as a Foundation for Liberation. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 1967a. ‘On the Genealogy of Morals’ (trans. W. Kaufman and R. J. Hollingdale), in Kaufman, W. (ed.), On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo. New York: Random House, pp. 24–166.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 1967b. ‘Ecce Homo’ (trans. W. Kaufmann), in Kaufman, W. (ed.), On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo. New York: Random House, pp. 223–338.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 1973. Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future (trans. R. J. Hollingdale). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 1994. The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings (ed. and trans. Geuss, R. and Speirs, R.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1989. ‘Recoiling from Reason’, New York Review of Books, 7 December. Available at: www.nybooks.com/articles/1989/12/07/recoiling-from-reason/.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 2001 [1986]. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donovan, O. 1994. Resurrection and Moral Order, 2nd edition. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, M. 1991 [1962]. Rationalism in Politics and other Essays, new and expanded edition. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Osborne, T. 2008. ‘MacIntyre, Thomism and the Contemporary Common Good’, Analyse & Kritik 30: 75–90.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1947. ‘Introduction’, in Weber, M., The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (trans. M. Henderson and T. Parsons, ed. Parsons, T.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perreau-Saussine, É. 2005. Alasdair MacIntyre: Une Biographie Intellectuelle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Pettigrove, G. 2011. ‘Is Virtue Ethics Self-Effacing?’, The Journal of Ethics 15 (3): 191–207.Google Scholar
Pinches, C. R. 2002. Theology and Action: After Theory in Christian Ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
Pinches, C. R. 2014. ‘On Hope’, in Timpe, K. and Boyd, C. (eds), Virtues and Their Vices. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 349–68.Google Scholar
Pinkoski, N. 2019. ‘Why Alasdair MacIntyre Is Not a Conservative Post-Liberal’, The Political Science Review 43 (2): 531–63.Google Scholar
Pozo, I. S. del 2022. ‘¿Por Qué Necesitamos Virtudes?: MacIntyre Tras Weber’, in de la Torre, F. J., Loria, M. and Nontol, L. (eds), Cuarenta Años de After Virtue de Alasdair MacIntyre: Relecturas Iberoamericanas. Madrid: Dykinson.Google Scholar
Quinton, A. 1978. The Politics of Imperfection: The Religious and Secular Traditions of Conservative Thought in England from Hooker to Oakeshott. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. Collected Papers (ed. Freeman, S.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 2002. ‘The Central Conflict: Morality and Self-Interest’, in Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 303–32.Google Scholar
Retter, M. D. 2015. ‘Internal Goods to Legal Practice: Reclaiming Fuller with MacIntyre’, UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 4 (1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Retter, M. D. 2019. ‘Before and After Legal Positivity: Peremptory Norms from Global and Transnational Social Practice’, in Siliquini-Cinelli, L. (ed.), Legal Positivism in a Global and Transnational Age. Dordecht: Springer, pp. 179–212.Google Scholar
Retter, M. D. 2022. ‘Common Goods, Group Rights, and Human Rights’, in Angier, T., Benson, I. and Retter, M. D. (eds), The Cambridge Handbook on Natural Law and Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 291–307.Google Scholar
Revel, J.-F. 1970. Ni Marx, Ni Jésus: La Nouvelle Révolution Mondiale est Commencée aux Etats-Unis. Paris: Robert Laffont.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. C. 2015. ‘How Virtue Contributes to Flourishing’, in Alfano, M. (ed.), Current Controversies in Virtue Theory. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 36–49.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Blanco, V. 2007. ‘Peter Winch and H. L. A. Hart: Two Concepts of the Internal Point of View’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20 (2): 453–73.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Blanco, V. 2014. Law and Authority under the Guise of the Good. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Rondel, D. 2007. ‘Equality, Luck, and Pragmatism’, Journal of Speculative Philosophy 21 (2): 115–23.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1991. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rowland, T. 2003. Culture and the Thomist Tradition: After Vatican II. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rudd, A. 2012. Self, Value, and Narrative: A Kierkegaardian Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, D. C. 2013. ‘Virtue Ethics, Happiness, and the Good Life’, in Russell, D. C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Virtue Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–28.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1945–1946. ‘Knowing How and Knowing That: The Presidential Address’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series 46: 1–16.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. J. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. J. 1984. ‘The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self’, Political Theory 12 (1): 81–96.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. 2007. Existentialism Is a Humanism (trans. C. Macomber). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sayers, S. P. 2011. ‘MacIntyre and Modernity’, in Blackledge, P. and Knight, K. (eds), Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. 1994. The Rejection of Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 2008 [1942]. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 3rd edition. New York: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
Scruton, R. 2006. ‘Hayek and Conservatism’, in Feser, E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hayek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–31.Google Scholar
Scruton, R. 2010. The Uses of Pessimism: And the Dangers of False Hope. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Y. 1980. A General Theory of Authority. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1995. Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of Our Traditional Ethics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Sinnicks, M. 2014. ‘Mastery of One’s Domain Is Not the Essence of Management’, Business Ethics Journal Review 2 (2): 8–14.Google Scholar
Solomon, D. 1999. ‘Keeping Virtue in Its Place: A Critique of Subordinating Strategies’, in Hibbs, J. and O’Callaghan, J. (eds), Recovering Nature: Essays in Natural Philosophy, Ethics, and Metaphysics in Honor of Ralph McInerny. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 83–104.Google Scholar
Stevenson, C. L. 1937. ‘The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms’, Mind, New Series 46 (181): 14–31.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. 1953. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Genesis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. 1995. Liberalism Ancient and Modern. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1994. ‘Justice after Virtue’, in Horton, J. and Mendus, S. (eds), After MacIntyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 16–43.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. 2008. Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Toner, C. H. 2010. ‘Virtue Ethics and the Nature and Forms of Egoism’, Journal of Philosophical Research 35: 275–303.Google Scholar
Tosi, J. and Warmke, B. 2022. ‘Conservative Critiques’, in Zwolinski, M. and Benjamin, B. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Libertarianism. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 579–92.Google Scholar
Trilling, L. 1978. The Liberal Imagination: Essays on Literature and Society. New York: New York Review Books.Google Scholar
Velleman, D. 2000. The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vermeule, A. 2018. ‘Integration from Within’, American Affairs 2 (1). Available at: https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2018/02/integration-from-within/.Google Scholar
Vermeule, A. 2019. ‘All Human Conflict Is Ultimately Theological’, Church Life Journal, 26 July. Available at: https://churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/all-human-conflict-is-ultimately-theological/.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. 2012. In God’s Shadow: Politics in the Hebrew Bible. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1994. ‘Parliament and Government in Germany under a New Political Order’ (trans. R. Speirs), in Lassman, P. and Speirs, R. (eds), Weber: Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–271.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 2004. ‘Politics as a Vocation’ (trans. R. Livingstone), in Owen, D. and Strong, T. B. (eds), Max Weber: The Vocation Lectures. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, pp. 32–94.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 2016. Die Protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus / Die Protestantischen Sekten und der Geist des Kapitalismus (Max Weber Gesamtausgabe, Teil 1, Vol. 18; ed. Schluchter, W.. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. 2002. ‘Eudaimonia, External Results, and Choosing Virtuous Actions for Themselves’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2): 270–90.Google Scholar
Williams, B. A. O. 2009. ‘Life as Narrative’, The European Journal of Philosophy 17 (2): 305–14.Google Scholar
Winch, P. 1990. The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy, 2nd edition. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wood, A. 2000. ‘Kant vs. Eudaimonism’, in Cicovacki, P. (ed.), Kant’s Legacy: Essays Dedicated to Lewis White Beck. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, pp. 261–82.Google Scholar
Wood, A. 2011. ‘Kant and Agent-Oriented Ethics’, in Jost, L. and Wuerth, J. (eds), Perfecting Virtue: New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 58–91.Google Scholar
Woodcock, S. 2015. ‘Neo-Aristotelian Naturalism and the Indeterminacy Objection’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (1): 23–41.Google Scholar