Book contents
- The New Cambridge Companion to Aquinas
- Other Volumes in the Series of Cambridge Companions
- The New Cambridge Companion to Aquinas
- Copyright page
- For our teachers
- Contents
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- A Select List of Aquinas’s Works
- Introduction
- Part I Life and Works
- Part II Metaphysics and the Ultimate Foundation of Reality
- Part III Epistemology
- Part IV Ethics
- Part V Philosophical Theology
- Bibliography
- Index
- Other Volumes in the Series of Cambridge Companions (continued from page ii)
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 July 2022
Book contents
- The New Cambridge Companion to Aquinas
- Other Volumes in the Series of Cambridge Companions
- The New Cambridge Companion to Aquinas
- Copyright page
- For our teachers
- Contents
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- A Select List of Aquinas’s Works
- Introduction
- Part I Life and Works
- Part II Metaphysics and the Ultimate Foundation of Reality
- Part III Epistemology
- Part IV Ethics
- Part V Philosophical Theology
- Bibliography
- Index
- Other Volumes in the Series of Cambridge Companions (continued from page ii)
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The New Cambridge Companion to Aquinas , pp. 381 - 400Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Acar, R. 2005. Talking about God and Talking about Creation: Avicenna’s and Thomas Aquinas’ Positions. Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science. Texts and Studies 58 (Leiden and Boston: Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, M. M. 1999. What Sort of Human Nature? Medieval Philosophy and the Systematics of Christology (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press).Google Scholar
Adams, M. M. 2012. “Why Bodies as Well as Souls?” in Doolan, G. T. (ed.), The Science of Being as Being: Metaphysical Investigations (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press), pp. 264–98.Google Scholar
Aertsen, J. 1996. Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals: The Case of Thomas Aquinas (Leiden, New York, and Cologne: Brill).Google Scholar
Aldama, J. and Solano, I.. 2014. Sacrae Theologiae Summa IIIA: On the Incarnate Word, On the Blessed Virgin Mary, Baker, K. (trans.) (Saddle River, NJ: Keep The Faith).Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. 2020. Virtue and Grace in the Theology of Thomas Aquinas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle, Barnes, J. (ed.) (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Augustine, . 1982. The Literal Meaning of Genesis, 2 vols., Taylor, J. H. (trans. and annotation) (New York: Newman Press).Google Scholar
Augustine, . 1994. “The Spirit and the Letter,” Holmes, P. and Wallis, R. (trans.), in Schaff, P. (ed.), The Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5 (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers).Google Scholar
Avicenna, . 1977. Liber de Philosophia Prima sive Scientia Divina, I–IV, Van Riet, S. ed. (Leuven and Leiden: Peeters and Brill).Google Scholar
Avicenna, . 2003. The Metaphysics of the Healing, Marmura, M. (trans.) (Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press).Google Scholar
Ayala, F. J. 2007. Darwin’s Gift to Science and Religion (Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press).Google Scholar
Bäck, A. T. 1998. “Scotus on the Consistency of the Incarnation and the Trinity,” Vivarium 36: 83–107.Google Scholar
Barker, M. 2012. “Experience and Experimentation: The Meaning of Experimentum in Aquinas,” The Thomist 76: 37–71.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. L. 2012. Christ’s Two Wills in Scholastic Thought: The Christology of Aquinas and Its Historical Contexts (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies).Google Scholar
Barnes, C. L. 2014. “Thomas Aquinas’s Chalcedonian Christology and Its Influence on Later Scholastics,” The Thomist 78: 189–217.Google Scholar
Bartel, T. W. 1991. “Like Us in All Things, Apart From Sin?,” Journal of Philosophical Research 16: 19–52.Google Scholar
Bataillon, L. J. 2014. “Introduction” in Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnia: iussu Leonis XIII P.M. edita (“Leonine edition”), vol. 44/1 (Rome: Commissio Leonina).Google Scholar
Bateson, M., Nettle, D., and Roberts, G.. 2006. “Cues of Being Watched Enhance Cooperation in a Real-World Setting,” Biology Letters 2: 412–14, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0509.Google Scholar
Beiting, C. 1998. “The Idea of Limbo in Thomas Aquinas,” The Thomist 62: 217–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belo, C. 2016. “Freedom and Determinism” in Taylor, R. and López-Farjeat, L. X. (eds.), Routledge Companion to Islamic Philosophy (New York: Routledge), pp. 325–36.Google Scholar
Bliss, R. and Trogdon, K.. 2016. “Metaphysical Grounding” in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [online], https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/grounding/.Google Scholar
Block, B. 2019. “Thomas Aquinas on How We Know Essences: The Formation and Perfection of Concepts in the Human Intellect.” Dissertation, The Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Boland, V. 1996. Ideas in God according to Saint Thomas Aquinas: Sources and Synthesis (New York: Brill).Google Scholar
Bouillard, H. 1944. Conversion et grâce chez S. Thomas d’Aquin (Paris: Éditions Aubier-Montaigne).Google Scholar
Boyle, L. 2002. “The Setting of the Summa Theologiae of St. Thomas – Revisited” in Pope, S. J. (ed.), The Ethics of Aquinas (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press), pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Bradley, D. 1997. Aquinas on the Twofold Human Good: Reason and Human Happiness in Aquinas’s Moral Science (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar
Breiner, N. 2018. “Punishment and Satisfaction in Aquinas’s Account of the Atonement,” Faith and Philosophy 35: 237–56.Google Scholar
Brower, J. 2005. “Aquinas’s Metaphysics of Modality: Reply to Leftow,” Modern Schoolman 83: 201–12.Google Scholar
Brower, J. 2014. Aquinas’s Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism, and Material Objects (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Brown, C. 2005. Aquinas and the Ship of Theseus: Solving Puzzles about Material Objects (London: Continuum).Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. 2001. “Aquinas on Spiritual Change” in Perler, D. (ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality (Leiden: Brill), pp. 129–53.Google Scholar
Burrell, D. B. 1993. Freedom and Creation in Three Traditions (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Burrell, D. B. (ed.). 2010. Creation and the God of Abraham (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Bynum, C. W. 1995. The Resurrection of the Body in Western Christianity, 200–1336 (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Calo, P. 1917. “Vita S. Thomae Aquinatis, c. 7” in Prümmer, D. (ed.), Fontes Vitae S. Thomae Aquinatis (Toulouse: Privat).Google Scholar
Calvin, J. 1989. Institutes of the Christian Religion, Beveridge, H. (trans.) (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans).Google Scholar
Carl, M. 1997. “Law, Virtue, and Happiness in Aquinas’s Moral Theory,” The Thomist 61: 425–47.Google Scholar
Carlson, J. W. 2012. Words of Wisdom: A Philosophical Dictionary for the Perennial Tradition (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenu, M.-D. 2002. Aquinas and His Role in Theology, Philibert, P. (trans.), (Collegeville: Liturgical Press).Google Scholar
Christianson, J. 1988. “Aquinas: The Necessity and Some Characteristics of the Habit of First Indemonstrable (Speculative) Principles,” New Scholasticism 62: 249–96.Google Scholar
Clayton, P. 2004. “Natural Law and Divine Action: The Search for an Expanded Theory of Causation,” Zygon 39: 615–36.Google Scholar
Cohoe, C. 2013. “There Must Be a First: Why Thomas Aquinas Rejects Infinite, Essentially Ordered, Causal Series,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21: 838–56.Google Scholar
Colton, R. 2006. “Two Rival Versions of Sexual Virtue: Simon Blackburn and John Paul II on Lust and Chastity,” The Thomist 70: 71–101.Google Scholar
Cory, D. 2018. “Agency and Materiality in Aquinas’s Soul Theory.” PhD thesis, The Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Cory, T. S. 2013. “What Is an Intellectual Turn? The Liber de Causis, Avicenna, and Aquinas’s Turn to Phantasms,” Tópicos 45: 129–62.Google Scholar
Cory, T. S. 2015. “Rethinking Abstractionism: Aquinas’s Intellectual Light and Some Arabic Sources,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53: 607–46.Google Scholar
Cory, T. S. 2014. Aquinas on Human Self-Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Cory, T. S. 2016. “Attention, Intentionality, and Mind-Reading in Aquinas’s De malo 16.8” in Dougherty, M. V. (ed.), Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 164–91.Google Scholar
Cory, T. S. 2020. “Aquinas’s Intelligible Species as Formal Constituents,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 31: 261–309.Google Scholar
Crisp, O. D. 2007. “Was Christ Sinless or Impeccable?,” Irish Theological Quarterly 72: 168–86.Google Scholar
Crisp, O. D. 2020. Approaching the Atonement: The Reconciling Work of Christ (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic).Google Scholar
Cross, R. 1989. “Nature and Personality in the Incarnation,” The Downside Review 107: 237–54.Google Scholar
Cross, R. 1996. “Aquinas on Nature, Hypostasis, and the Metaphysics of the Incarnation,” The Thomist 60: 171–202.Google Scholar
Cross, R. 2005. The Metaphysics of the Incarnation: Thomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Cross, R. 2019. Communicatio Idiomatum: Reformation Christological Debates (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dahm, B. 2015. “The Acquired Virtues Are Real Virtues: A Response to Stump,” Faith and Philosophy 32: 453–70.Google Scholar
Davies, B. 2016. Thomas Aquinas’s Summa contra Gentiles: A Guide and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
De Haan, D. 2014. “Perception and the Vis Cogitativa: A Thomistic Analysis of Aspectual, Actional, and Affectional Percepts,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 88: 397–437.Google Scholar
De Haan, D. 2019. “Approaching Other Animals with Caution: Exploring Insights from Aquinas’s Psychology,” New Blackfriars 100: 715–37.Google Scholar
De Haan, D. 2019. “Aquinas on Sensing, Perceiving, Thinking, Understanding, and Cognizing Individuals” in Băltuṭă, E. (ed.), Medieval Perceptual Puzzles: Theories of Sense-Perception in the 13th and 14th Centuries (Leiden: Brill), pp. 238–68.Google Scholar
Descartes, . 1984. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D. (trans.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Dewan, L. 1999. “St. Thomas and the Causes of Free Choice,” Acta Philosophica 8: 87–96.Google Scholar
DeYoung, R., McCluskey, C., and Van Dyke, C.. 2009. Aquinas’s Ethics: Metaphysical Foundations, Moral Theory, and Theological Context (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Dodds, M. J. 2012. Unlocking Divine Action: Contemporary Science and Thomas Aquinas (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar
Echavarría, A. 2020. “Aquinas on Divine Impeccability, Omnipotence, and Free Will,” Religious Studies 56: 256–73.Google Scholar
Emery, G. 2007. The Trinitarian Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Fabro, C. 1950. La nozione metafisica di partecipazione secondo s. Tommaso d’Aquino (Turin: Società Editrice Internazionale).Google Scholar
Fabro, C. 1961. Participation et causalité selon s. Thomas d’Aquin (Leuven and Paris: Publications Universitaires de Louvain and Béatrice-Nauwelaerts).Google Scholar
Fakhry, M. 2008 [1958]. Islamic Occasionalism and Its Critique by Averroes and Aquinas (Abingdon and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Farrer, A. 1967. Faith and Speculation: An Essay in Philosophical Theology (London: Adam and Charles Black).Google Scholar
Feingold, L. 2016. “God’s Movement of the Soul Through Operative and Cooperative Grace” in Long, S. A., Nutt, R. W., and White, T. J. (eds.), Thomism and Predestination: Principles and Disputations (Ave Maria, FL: Sapientia Press), pp. 166–91.Google Scholar
Feser, E. 2019. Aristotle’s Revenge: The Metaphysical Foundations of Physical and Biological Science (Haverton, PA: Editiones Scholasticae).Google Scholar
Fisher, K. 2017. “Thomas Aquinas on Hylomorphism and the In-Act Principle,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25: 1053–72.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, A. 2017. Thomas Aquinas on Bodily Identity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Freddoso, A. 1986. “Human Nature, Potency and the Incarnation,” Faith and Philosophy 3: 27–53.Google Scholar
Frost, G. 2022. Aquinas on Efficient Causation and Causal Powers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlong, P. 2015. “Aquinas, the Principle of Alternative Possibilities, and Augustine’s Axiom,” International Philosophical Quarterly 55: 179–96.Google Scholar
Gaine, S. F. 2003. Will There Be Free Will in Heaven? Freedom, Impeccability, and Beatitude (London: T&T Clark).Google Scholar
Gaine, S. F. 2015. “Christ’s Acquired Knowledge according to Thomas Aquinas: How Aquinas’s Philosophy Helped and Hindered His Account,” New Blackfriars 96: 255–68.Google Scholar
Gaine, S. F. 2017. “The Veracity of Prophecy and Christ’s Knowledge,” New Blackfriars 98: 44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, D. 1994. “Free Choice and Free Judgment in Thomas Aquinas,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 76: 247–77.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, A. 1993. “Reductionism” in Boyd, R., Gasper, P., and Trout, J. D. (eds.), The Philosophy of Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 443–59.Google Scholar
Garrigou-Lagrange, R. 1946. La synthèse thomiste. Bibliothèque Française de Philosophie (Paris: Desclée de Brouwer).Google Scholar
Geiger, L.-B. 1942. La participation dans la philosophie de S. Thomas d’Aquin (Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin).Google Scholar
Gilson, É. 1952. Being and Some Philosophers (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies).Google Scholar
Gondreau, P. 2009. “St. Thomas Aquinas, the Communication of Idioms, and the Suffering of Christ in the Garden of Gethsemane” in Keating, J. F. and White, T. J. O. P. (eds.), Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans), pp. 214–45.Google Scholar
Gondreau, P. 2018. The Passions of Christ’s Soul in the Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas (Providence, RI: Cluny Media).Google Scholar
Gorman, M. 2000. “Uses of the Person–Nature Distinction in Thomas’s Christology,” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 67: 58–79.Google Scholar
Gorman, M. 2014. “Christological Consistency and the Reduplicative Qua,” Journal of Analytic Theology 2: 86–100.Google Scholar
Gorman, M. 2016. “Classical Theism, Classical Anthropology, and the Christological Coherence Problem,” Faith and Philosophy 33: 278–92.Google Scholar
Gorman, M. 2017. Aquinas on the Metaphysics of the Hypostatic Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, W. M. 2001. “Aquinas among Libertarians and Compatibilists: Breaking the Logic of Theological Determinism,” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75: 221–35.Google Scholar
Grimm, S. 2021. “Understanding” in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [online], https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/understanding/.Google Scholar
Gui, B. 1959. “Vita S. Thomae Aquinatis, c. 6” in Foster, K. (ed.), The Life of St. Thomas Aquinas: Biographical Documents (Baltimore, MD: Helicon Press).Google Scholar
Hause, J. 1997. “Thomas Aquinas and the Voluntarists,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6: 167–82.Google Scholar
Hause, J. 2007. “Aquinas on the Function of Moral Virtue,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81: 1–20.Google Scholar
Hauser, C. n.d. “Aquinas on Persons, Psychological Subjects, and the Coherence of the Incarnation” [manuscript].Google Scholar
Hauser, C. 2020. “On Being Human and Divine: The Coherence of the Incarnation,” Faith and Philosophy 37: 3–31.Google Scholar
Hibbs, T. 1988. “Against a Cartesian Reading of Intellectus in Aquinas,” The Modern Schoolman 66: 55–69.Google Scholar
Hight, M. A. 2010. “The Son More Visible: Immaterialism and the Incarnation,” Modern Theology 26: 120–48.Google Scholar
Hill, J. 2012. “Aquinas and the Unity of Christ: A Defence of Compositionalism,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71: 117–35.Google Scholar
Hobson, P. 2005. “What Puts Jointness into Joint Attention?” in Eilan, N., Hoerl, C., McCormack, T., and Roessler, J. (eds.), Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 185–204.Google Scholar
Hofer, A. 2009. “Balthasar’s Eschatology on the Intermediate State: The Question of Knowability,” Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 12: 148–72.Google Scholar
Hoffman, P. 1990. “St. Thomas Aquinas on the Halfway State of Sensible Being,” Philosophical Review 99: 73–92.Google Scholar
Hoffman, P. 2005. “Aquinas on Threats and Temptations,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86: 225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, T. 2021. Free Will and the Rebel Angels in Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T. and Furlong, P.. 2016. “Free Choice” in Dougherty, M. V. (ed.), Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 56–74.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T. and Michon, C.. 2017. “Aquinas on Free Will and Intellectual Determinism,” Philosophers’ Imprint 17: 1–36.Google Scholar
International Theological Commission. 2004. Communion and Stewardship, https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20040723_communion-stewardship_en.html.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. 1997. Knowledge and Faith in Thomas Aquinas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Jensen, S. 2017. “Libertarian Free Choice: A Thomistic Account,” The Thomist 81: 315–43.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. 2021. “Final Causality, Cognition, and Self-Motion in Aquinas’s Natural Philosophy” [manuscript].Google Scholar
Johnson, J. 2021. “Nature Does Nothing in Vain: Reexamining Aquinas’s Fifth Way” [manuscript].Google Scholar
Kerr, G. 2012. “Ontological Commitment and Thomistic Realism” in McEvoy, J., Dunne, M., and Hynes, J. (eds.), Thomas Aquinas: Teaching and Scholar (Dublin: Four Courts Press), pp. 211–29.Google Scholar
Kerr, G. 2015. Aquinas’s Way to God: The Proof in De Ente et Essentia (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kerr, G. 2019. Aquinas and the Metaphysics of Creation (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1984. “1953 and All That: A Tale of Two Sciences,” The Philosophical Review 93: 335–73.Google Scholar
Klubertanz, G. 1952. The Discursive Power: Sources and Doctrine of the Vis Cogitativa according to St. Thomas Aquinas (Saint Louis: The Modern Schoolman).Google Scholar
Klubertanz, G. P. 1952. “St. Thomas and the Knowledge of the Singular,” New Scholasticism 26: 135–66.Google Scholar
Knobel, A. M. 2021. Aquinas and the Infused Moral Virtues (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Krause, K. 2020. Thomas Aquinas on Seeing God: The Beatific Vision in His Commentary on Peter Lombard’s Sentences IV.49.2 (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press).Google Scholar
Kretzmann, N. 1993. “Philosophy of Mind” in Kretzmann, N. and Stump, E. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 128–59.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, N. 1997. The Metaphysics of Theism: Aquinas’s Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles I (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Kretzmann, N. 1998. The Metaphysics of Creation: Aquinas’s Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles II (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Kromholtz, B. 2010. On the Last Day: The Time of the Resurrection of the Dead according to Thomas Aquinas (Fribourg: Academic Press Fribourg).Google Scholar
Kvanvig, J. L. and McCann, H. J.. 1988. “Divine Conservation and the Persistence of the World” in Morris, T. V. (ed.), Divine and Human Action (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 13–49.Google Scholar
Lamb, M. L. 2004. “The Eschatology of St. Thomas Aquinas” in Weinandy, T. G., Keating, D. A., and Yocum, J. P. (eds.), Aquinas on Doctrine: A Critical Introduction (New York: T&T Clark), pp. 225–40.Google Scholar
Langley, S. 2001. “Aquinas, Resurrection, and Material Continuity,” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75: 135–47.Google Scholar
Leget, C. 2005. “Eschatology” in van Nieuwenhove, R. and Wawrykow, J. (eds.), The Theology of Thomas Aquinas (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 386–406.Google Scholar
Levering, M. W. 2017. Engaging the Doctrine of Creation: Cosmos, Creatures, and the Wise and Good Creator (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic).Google Scholar
Lisska, A. 2016. Aquinas’s Theory of Perception: An Analytic Reconstruction (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lonergan, B. J. F. 2000. Grace and Freedom: Operative Grace in the Thought of St. Thomas Aquinas. Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan, vol. 1 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar
Long, S. A., Nutt, R. W., and White, T. J. (eds.). 2016. Thomism and Predestination: Principles and Disputations (Ave Maria, FL: Sapientia Press).Google Scholar
López-Farjeat, L. X. 2012. “Avicenna’s Influence on Aquinas’ Early Doctrine of Creation in ‘In Sent.’, D. 1, Q. 1, A. 2,” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 79: 307–37.Google Scholar
Loughran, S. 1999. “Aquinas, Compatibilist” in McLain, F. W. and Richardson, W. M. (eds.), Human and Divine Agency: Anglican, Catholic, and Lutheran Perspectives (Lanham, MD: University Press of America), pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Löwe, C. L. 2021. Thomas Aquinas on the Metaphysics of the Human Act (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
MacDonald, S. 1991. “Ultimate Ends in Practical Reasoning: Aquinas’s Aristotelian Moral Psychology and Anscombe’s Fallacy,” Philosophical Review 100: 31–66.Google Scholar
MacDonald, S. 1993. “Theory of Knowledge” in Kretzmann, N. and Stump, E. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 160–95.Google Scholar
MacDonald, S. 1998. “Aquinas’s Libertarian Account of Free Choice,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 52: 309–28.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 2007. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 3rd edn. (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Matava, F. J. 2016. Divine Causality and Human Free Choice: Domingo Báñez, Physical Premotion and the Controversy de Auxiliis Revisited (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
McCluskey, C. 2002. “Intellective Appetite and the Freedom of Human Action,” The Thomist 66: 421–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCluskey, C. 2013. “Thomism” in Crisp, R. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 147–66.Google Scholar
McCluskey, C. 2017. Thomas Aquinas on Moral Wrongdoing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
McFadden, R. D. and Macropoulos, A.. 2008. “Wal-Mart Employee Trampled to Death,” New York Times, November 28, 2008, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/29/business/29walmart.html [accessed February 9, 2012].Google Scholar
McGilchrist, I. 2009. The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
McKinley, J. E. 2009. Tempted for Us: Theological Models and the Practical Relevance of Christ’s Impeccability and Temptation (Eugene, OR: Paternoster).Google Scholar
McKinley, J. E. 2011. “Four Patristic Models of Jesus Christ’s Impeccability and Temptation,” Perichoresis 9: 29–66.Google Scholar
Miner, R. 2009. Thomas Aquinas on the Passions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Miner, R. 2011. Thomas Aquinas on the Passions: A Study of Summa Theologiae, Ia2ae 22–48 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Moloney, R. 1998. “Approaches to Christ’s Knowledge in the Patristic Era” in Finan, T. and Twomey, V. (eds.), Studies in Patristic Christology (Portland, OR: Four Courts Press), pp. 37–66.Google Scholar
Morard, M. 2005. “Thomas d’Aquin lecteur des Conciles,” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 98: 211–365.Google Scholar
Murray, J. C. 1963. The Infused Knowledge of Christ in the Theology of the 12th and 13th Centuries (Windsor, ON: Privately printed PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Nevitt, T. C. 2016. “Aquinas on the Death of Christ,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90: 77–99.Google Scholar
Noone, T. and Hauser, R. E.. 2020. “Saint Bonaventure” in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [online], https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/bonaventure/.Google Scholar
Norris Clarke, W. 1994. “Action as the Self-Revelation of Being: A Central Theme in the Thought of St. Thomas” in Explorations in Metaphysics: Being – God – Person (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 45–65.Google Scholar
Norris Clarke, W. 1994. “The Limitation of Act by Potency in St. Thomas: Aristotelianism or Neoplatonism?” in Explorations in Metaphysics: Being – God – Person (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 89–101.Google Scholar
Norris Clarke, W. 2001. The One and the Many: A Contemporary Metaphysics (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, J. 2003. Thomist Realism and the Linguistic Turn (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Oelze, A. 2018. Animal Rationality: Later Medieval Theories 1250–1350 (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Oliva, A. 2006. Les débuts de l’enseignement de Thomas d’Aquin et sa conception de la Sacra Doctrina avec l’édition du prologue de son Commentaire des Sentences (Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin).Google Scholar
Olson, C. E. and Meconi, D.. 2016. Called To Be the Children of God: The Catholic Theology of Human Deification, annotated edn. (San Francisco: Ignatius Press).Google Scholar
O’Neill, T. P. 2019. Grace, Predestination, and the Permission of Sin: A Thomistic Analysis (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar
O’Rourke, F. 2019. Ciphers of Transcendence: Essays in Philosophy of Religion in Honour of Patrick Masterson (Newbridge: Irish Academic Press).Google Scholar
Ortiz, J. 2019. Deification in the Latin Patristic Tradition (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar
Owens, J. 1985. An Interpretation of Existence (Houston, TX: Center for Thomistic Studies, University of St. Thomas).Google Scholar
Paluch, M. 2004. La profondeur de l’amour divin: La prédestination dans l’œuvre de saint Thomas d’Aquin (Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin).Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. 2002. Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. and Shields, C.. 2004. The Philosophy of Aquinas (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).Google Scholar
Pawl, T. 2014. “A Solution to the Fundamental Philosophical Problem of Christology,” Journal of Analytic Theology 2: 61–85.Google Scholar
Pawl, T. 2014. “The Freedom of Christ and Explanatory Priority,” Religious Studies 50: 157–73.Google Scholar
Pawl, T. 2014. “The Freedom of Christ and the Problem of Deliberation,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75: 233–47.Google Scholar
Pawl, T. 2015. “Conciliar Christology and the Problem of Incompatible Predications,” Scientia et Fides 3: 85–106.Google Scholar
Pawl, T. 2016. “Temporary Intrinsics and Christological Predication” in Kvanvig, J. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion: Volume 7 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 157–89.Google Scholar
Pawl, T. 2016. In Defense of Conciliar Christology: A Philosophical Essay (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Pawl, T. 2018. “Conciliar Christology and the Consistency of Divine Immutability with a Mutable, Incarnate God,” Nova et Vetera 16: 913–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawl, T. 2019. In Defense of Extended Conciliar Christology: A Philosophical Essay (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Pawl, T. 2019. “The Metaphysics of the Incarnation: Christ’s Human Nature” in Marschler, T. and Schärtl, T. (eds.), Herausforderungen und Modifikationen des klassischen Theismus. Volume 1: Die Trinität (Münster: Aschendorff), pp. 131–48.Google Scholar
Pelser, A. 2019. “Temptation, Virtue, and the Character of Christ,” Faith and Philosophy 36: 81–101.Google Scholar
Pinckaers, S. 2001. Morality: The Catholic View, Sherwin, M. (trans.) (South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press).Google Scholar
Pinsent, A. 2012. The Second-Person Perspective in Aquinas’s Ethics: Virtues and Gifts (New York and Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
Pinsent, A. 2014. “Avarice and Liberality” in Timpe, K. and Boyd, C. A. (eds.), Virtues and Their Vices (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 157–76.Google Scholar
Pinsent, A. 2014. “Neurotheological Eudaimonia” in Levy, N. and Clausen, J. (eds.), Handbook of Neuroethics (Dordrecht: Springer).Google Scholar
Pinsent, A. 2017. “Who’s Afraid of the Infused Virtues? Dispositional Infusion, Human and Divine” in Goris, H. and Schoot, H. (eds.), The Virtuous Life: Thomas Aquinas on the Theological Nature of Moral Virtues (Leuven, Paris, and Bristol, CT: Peeters), pp. 73–96.Google Scholar
Pinsent, A. 2020. “Temperance and the Second-Person Perspective,” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12: 101–15.Google Scholar
Pohle, J. 1911. The Divine Trinity: A Dogmatic Treatise (St. Louis, MO: B. Herder Book Co.).Google Scholar
Pohle, J. 1913. Christology: A Dogmatic Treatise on the Incarnation (St. Louis, MO: B. Herder Book Co.).Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, J. 1989. Science and Providence: God’s Interaction with the World (Boston, MA: New Science Library).Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, J. 1996. “Chaos Theory and Divine Action” in Richardson, W. M. and Wildman, W. J. (eds.), Religion and Science: History, Method and Dialogue (New York: Routledge), pp. 243–52.Google Scholar
Porro, P. 2016. Thomas Aquinas: A Historical and Philosophical Profile, Trabbic, J. G. and Nutt, R. W. (trans.) (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar
Porter, J. 1992. “The Subversion of Virtue: Acquired and Infused Virtues in the ‘Summa Theologiae,’” Annual of the Society of Christian Ethics 12: 19–41.Google Scholar
Porter, J. 2019. “Moral Virtues, Charity, and Grace: Why the Infused and Acquired Virtues Cannot Co-Exist,” Journal of Moral Theology 8: 40–66.Google Scholar
Prudlo, D. S. 2020. Thomas Aquinas: A Historical, Theological, and Environmental Portrait (Mahway, NJ: Paulist Press).Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius, . 1987. The Complete Works, Froehlich, K. (trans.) (Mahway, NJ: Paulist Press).Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius, . 1987. “The Divine Names,” Luibheid, C. (trans.), in The Complete Works, Froehlich, K. (trans.) (Mahway, NJ: Paulist Press).Google Scholar
Quinn, P. L. 1989. “Aquinas on Atonement” in Feenstra, R. J. (ed.), Trinity, Incarnation, and Atonement (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 153–77.Google Scholar
Reichberg, G. 2002. “The Intellectual Virtues” in Pope, S. (ed.), The Ethics of Aquinas (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).Google Scholar
Reynolds, P. L. 1999. Food and the Body: Some Peculiar Questions in High Medieval Theology (Boston, MA: Brill).Google Scholar
Richardson, K. 2020. “Causation in Arabic and Islamic Thought” in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [online] https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/arabic-islamic-causation/.Google Scholar
Rigby, P. 2015. The Theology of Augustine’s Confessions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Rota, M. 2004. “Substance and Artifact in Thomas Aquinas,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 21: 241–59.Google Scholar
Rota, M. 2012. “Causation” in Davies, B. and Stump, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook to Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 104–14.Google Scholar
Sammon, B. T. 2014. The God Who Is Beauty: Beauty as a Divine Name in Thomas Aquinas and Dionysius the Areopagite (Cambridge: James Clarke & Co.).Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. 1966. The Domain of Logic according to St. Thomas Aquinas (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
Schrader, D. 2021. “Christ’s Fear of the Lord according to Thomas Aquinas,” Heythrop Journal 62: 1052–64.Google Scholar
Senor, T. D. 2007. “The Compositional Account of the Incarnation,” Faith and Philosophy 24: 52–71.Google Scholar
Shanley, B. J. 1998. “Divine Causation and Human Freedom in Aquinas,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 72: 99–122.Google Scholar
Shanley, B. J. 1998. “Aquinas on God’s Causal Knowledge: A Reply to Stump and Kretzmann,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 72: 447–57.Google Scholar
Shanley, B. J. 2008. “Beyond Libertarianism and Compatibilism: Thomas Aquinas on Created Freedom” in Velkley, R. (ed.), Freedom and the Human Person (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press), pp. 70–89.Google Scholar
Sherwin, M. S. 2005. By Knowledge and by Love: Charity and Knowledge in the Moral Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar
Silva, I. 2013. “Thomas Aquinas Holds Fast: Objections to Aquinas within Today’s Debate on Divine Action,” Heythrop Journal 48: 658–67.Google Scholar
Silva, J. F. 2014. “Medieval Theories of Active Perception: An Overview” in Silva, J. F. and Yrjönsuuri, M. (eds.), Active Perception in the History of Philosophy (Cham: Springer), pp. 117–46.Google Scholar
Smiley, M. 2020. “Collective Responsibility” in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [online], https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/collective-responsibility/.Google Scholar
Spiering, J. A. 2015. “‘What Is Freedom?’: An Instance of the Silence of St. Thomas,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89: 27–46.Google Scholar
Stenberg, J. 2016. “‘Considerandum est quid sit beatitudo’: Aquinas on What Happiness Really is,” Res Philosophica 93: 161–84.Google Scholar
Stevenson, A. 2021. “The Unity of Christ and the Historical Jesus: Aquinas and Locke on Personal Identity,” Modern Theology 37: 851–64.Google Scholar
Stump, E. 1988. “Atonement according to Aquinas” in Morris, T. (ed.), Philosophy and the Christian Faith (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 61–91.Google Scholar
Stump, E. 1993. “Biblical Commentary and Philosophy” in Kretzmann, N. and Stump, E. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 252–68.Google Scholar
Stump, E. 1995. “Non-Cartesian Substance Dualism and Materialism without Reductionism,” Faith and Philosophy 12: 505–31.Google Scholar
Stump, E. 2004. “Aquinas’s Metaphysics of the Incarnation” in Davis, S. T., Kendall, D., and O’Collins, G. (eds.), The Incarnation (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 197–218.Google Scholar
Stump, E. 2006. “Resurrection, Reassembly, and Reconstitution: Aquinas on the Soul” in Niederbacher, B. and Runggaldier, E. (eds.), Die menschliche Seele: Brauchen wir den Dualismus? (Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag), pp. 151–71.Google Scholar
Stump, E. 2007. “Justifying Faith, Free Will, and the Atonement” in Velkley, R. (ed.), Freedom and the Human Person (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press), pp. 90–105.Google Scholar
Stump, E. 2011. “The Non-Aristotelian Character of Aquinas’s Ethics: Aquinas on the Passions,” Faith and Philosophy 28: 29–43.Google Scholar
Stump, E. 2013. “Emergence, Causal Powers, and Aristotelianism in Metaphysics” in Groff, R. and Greco, J. (eds.), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism (New York and Oxford: Routledge), pp. 48–68.Google Scholar
Stump, E. 2016. The God of the Bible and the God of the Philosophers: Aquinas Lecture (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press).Google Scholar
Stump, E. 2019. “Aquinas’s Ethics: The Infused Virtues and the Indwelling of the Holy Spirit,” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 95: 269–81.Google Scholar
Stump, E. and Kretzmann, N.. 1998. “Eternity and God’s Knowledge: A Reply to Shanley,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 72: 439–45.Google Scholar
ten Klooster, A. 2018. Thomas Aquinas on the Beatitudes: Reading Matthew, Disputing Grace and Virtue, Preaching Happiness (Leuven, Paris, and Bristol, CT: Peeters).Google Scholar
ten Klooster, A. 2019. “Aquinas on the Fruits of the Holy Spirit as the Delight of the Christian Life,” Journal of Moral Theology 8: 80–94.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1911. The “Summa Theologica” of St. Thomas Aquinas, Literally Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province (London: Burns, Oates and Washbourne).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1982. Quaestiones disputatae De malo (Rome: Commissio Leonina; Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1965. Quaestiones disputatae. Volume 2: Quaestiones disputatae de potentia. Pession, P. M. (ed.), 10th edn. (Turin and Rome: Marietti), pp. 1–276.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1970–76. Quaestiones disputatae De veritate (Rome: Editori di san Tommaso).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1971. In duodecim libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis expositio. Cathala, M. R. and Spiazzi, R. M. (eds.), 2nd edn. (Turin and Rome: Marietti).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1979. Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita. Volume 42: Compendium theologiae seu Brevis compilatio theologiae ad fratrem Raynaldum (Roma: Editori di San Tommaso), pp. 5–205.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1889–1906. Opera omnia iussu impensaque Leonis XIII P. M. edita. Summae theologiae. Volumes 4–5: Pars prima; volume 6–7: Prima secundae; volumes 8–10: Secunda secundae; volumes 11–12: Tertia pars (Rome: Ex Typographia Polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1953. Super Epistolas S. Pauli lectura. Volume 1: Super Epistolam ad Romanos lectura. Cai, R. (ed.), 8th edn. (Turin and Rome: Marietti), pp. 1–230.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1953. Super Epistolas S. Pauli lectura. Volume 1: Super secundam Epistolam ad Corinthios lectura. Cai, R. (ed.), 8th edn. (Turin and Rome: Marietti), pp. 437–561.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1953. Super Epistolas S. Pauli lectura. Volume 2: Super Epistolam ad Ephesios lectura. Cai, R. (ed.), 8th edn. (Turin and Rome: Marietti), pp. 1–87.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1953. Super Epistolas S. Pauli lectura. Volume 2: Super primam Epistolam ad Timotheum lectura. Cai, R. (ed.), 8th edn. (Turin and Rome: Marietti), pp. 211–264.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1965. Quaestiones disputatae. Volume 2: Quaestio disputata de caritate. Odetto, E. (ed.), 10th edn. (Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1965), pp. 753–790.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1972. Super Evangelium S. Ioannis lectura. Cai, R. (ed.), 6th edn. (Turin and Rome: Marietti).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1996. Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita. Volume 25/1: Quaestiones de quolibet.Préface. Quodlibet VII, VIII, IX, X, XI; volume 25/2: Quaestiones de quolibet. Quodlibet I, II, III, VI, IV, V, XII. (Rome: Commissio Leonina; Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1947. Summa theologica, Fathers of the English Dominican Province (trans.) (New York: Benzinger Brothers).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1948. Compendium of Theology, Vollert, C. (trans.) (St. Louis: B. Herder Book Co.).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1950. In librum Beati Dionysii De divinis nominibus Expositio (Turin: Marietti).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1954. The Disputed Questions on Truth (in Three Volumes), Schmidt, R. (trans.) (Chicago: Henry Regnery Co.).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1956. Summa contra Gentiles, vol. II, Anderson, J. (trans.) (Garden City, NJ: Doubleday).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1962. Tractatus de substantis separatis (West Hartford, CT: St. Joseph College).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1981. The Summa theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas, Fathers of the English Dominican Province (trans.) (South Bend, IN: Christian Classics).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1989. Summa contra Gentiles. Book Four: Salvation (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1992. Super Boethium De trinitate et expositio libri Boethii De ebdomadibus (Rome: Commissio Leonina).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1998. “On Being and Essence” in McInerny, R. (trans.), Thomas Aquinas Selected Writings (London and New York: Penguin).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 2005. Disputed Questions on the Virtues, Atkins, E. M. and Williams, T. (eds. and trans.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 2011. “On Creation: Quaestiones disputatae De potentia Dei, Q.3” in Selner-Wright, S. (trans.), Thomas Aquinas in Translation (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 2012. Commentary on the Letter of Saint Paul to the Romans, Larcher, F. R., Mortensen, J., and Alarcón, E. (trans.) (Lander, WY: Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 2012. The Power of God, Regan, R. J. (trans.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Tocco, W. 1996. Ystoria Sancti Thome de Aquino (critical edition prepared by C. le Brun-Gouanvic, Ystoria Sancti Thome de Aquino de Guillaume de Tocco (1323)) (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies).Google Scholar
Tolomeo of Lucca, . 1968. “Historia Ecclesiastica Nova 22.24,” in Ferrua, A. (ed.), S. Thomae Aquinatis Vitae Fontes Precipuae (Alba: Edizioni Domenicanae).Google Scholar
Toner, P. 2009. “Personhood and Death in St. Thomas Aquinas,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 26: 121–38.Google Scholar
Torrell, J.-P. 2003. Saint Thomas Aquinas. Volume 1: The Person and His Work, Royal, R. (trans.) (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar
Torrell, J.-P. 2003. Saint Thomas Aquinas. Volume 2: Spiritual Master, Royal, R. (trans.) (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar
Torrell, J.-P. 2015. Initiation à saint Thomas d’Aquin: Sa personne et son œuvre, new edn. (Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf).Google Scholar
Torrell, J.-P. 2017. Saint Thomas d’Aquin, maître spirituel, 3rd edn. (Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf).Google Scholar
Tuttle, J. 2016. “Suárez’s Non-Reductive Theory of Efficient Causation,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 4: 125–58.Google Scholar
Tyra, S. W. 2014. “When Considering Creation, Simply Follow the Rule (of Faith): Patristic Exegesis of Romans 8:9–12 and the Theological Interpretation of Scripture,” Journal of Theological Interpretation 8: 251–73.Google Scholar
Ugobi-Onyemere, M. 2015. Knowledge of the First Principles in Saint Thomas Aquinas (Oxford: Peter Lang).Google Scholar
Valuet, B. 2018. Dieu joueur d’échecs? Prédestination, grâce et libre arbitre. Volume 2: Relecture de saint Thomas d’Aquin (Le Barroux: Éditions Sainte-Madeleine).Google Scholar
Valuet, B. 2019. “Prédestination, grâce et libre arbitre, tentative de synthèse personnelle,” Revue thomiste 119: 67–90.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, C. 2014. “Aquinas’s Shiny Happy People: Perfect Happiness and the Limits of Human Nature,” Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Religion 6: 269–91.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, P. 1994. “Composition as Identity” in Tomberlin, J. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 8 (Altascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Co.), pp. 207–19.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, P. 1998. “Resurrection” in Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy 8 (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhove, R. 2012. “The Saving Work of Christ” in Davies, B. and Stump, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 436–47.Google Scholar
Visser, S. and Williams, T.. 2009. Anselm. Great Medieval Thinkers (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Wallace, W. A. 1974. “Aquinas on Creation: Science, Theology, and Matters of Fact,” The Thomist 38: 485–523.Google Scholar
Wawrykow, J. P. 1995. God’s Grace and Human Action: “Merit” in the Theology of Thomas Aquinas (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Wawrykow, J. 2015. “The Christology of Thomas Aquinas in Its Scholastic Context” in Murphy, F. and Stefano, T. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Christology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 233–49.Google Scholar
Wawrykow, J. 2018. “Aquinas and Bonaventure on Creation” in Anderson, G. and Bockmuehl, M. (eds.), Creation ex nihilo: Origins, Development, Contemporary Challenges (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 173–94.Google Scholar
Weisheipl, J. A. 1974. Friar Thomas d’Aquino: His Life, Thought, and Work (New York: Doubleday).Google Scholar
Werther, D. 2012. “Freedom, Temptation, and Incarnation” in Werther, D. and Linville, M. (eds.), Philosophy and the Christian Worldview: Analysis, Assessment and Development (New York: Continuum), pp. 252–65.Google Scholar
Westberg, D. 1994. Right Practical Reason: Aristotle, Action, and Prudence in Aquinas (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Westberg, D. 1994. “Did Aquinas Change His Mind about the Will?,” The Thomist 58: 41–60.Google Scholar
White, T. J. 2005. “The Voluntary Action of the Earthly Christ and the Necessity of the Beatific Vision,” The Thomist 69: 497–534.Google Scholar
White, T. J. 2009. Wisdom in the Face of Modernity (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar
White, T. J. 2016. “Divine Simplicity and the Holy Trinity,” International Journal of Systematic Theology 18: 66–93.Google Scholar
White, T. J. 2016. “Nicene Orthodoxy and Trinitarian Simplicity,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90: 727–50.Google Scholar
White, T. J. 2016. The Incarnate Lord: A Thomistic Study in Christology (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar
Williams, T. 2012. “Human Freedom and Agency” in Davies, B. and Stump, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 199–208.Google Scholar
Williams, T. 2021. “Atonement” in Cross, R. and Paasch, J. T. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Medieval Philosophy (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Wippel, J. F. 1977. “The Condemnations of 1270 and 1277 at Paris,” Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 7: 169–201.Google Scholar
Wippel, J. F. 1989. “Truth in Thomas Aquinas: Part 1,” Review of Metaphysics 43: 295–326.Google Scholar
Wippel, J. F. 1990. “Truth in Thomas Aquinas: Part 2,” Review of Metaphysics 43: 543–67.Google Scholar
Wippel, J. F. 1995. “Thomas Aquinas and the Condemnation of 1277,” The Modern Schoolman 72: 233–72.Google Scholar
Wippel, J. F. 1995. “Divine Knowledge, Divine Power, and Human Freedom in Thomas Aquinas and Henry of Ghent” in Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press), pp. 213–41.Google Scholar
Wippel, J. F. 2000. The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: From Finite Being to Uncreated Being (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar
Wippel, J. F. 2003. “Norman Kretzmann on Aquinas’s Attribution of Will and Freedom to Create to God,” Religious Studies 39: 287–98.Google Scholar
Wippel, J. F. 2007. “Truth in Thomas Aquinas” in Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas II (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press), pp. 65–113.Google Scholar
Wippel, J. F. 2007. “Thomas Aquinas and the Axiom ‘What Is Received Is Received according to the Mode of the Receiver’” in Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas II (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press), pp. 113–23.Google Scholar
Wippel, J. F. 2007. “Thomas Aquinas and the Axiom that Unreceived Act Is Unlimited” in Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas II (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press), pp. 123–52.Google Scholar
Wippel, J. F. 2007. “Thomas Aquinas on Our Knowledge of God and the Axiom that Every Agent Produces Something Like Itself” in Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas II (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press), pp. 152–71.Google Scholar
Wippel, J. F. 2011. “Thomas Aquinas on the Ultimate Why Question: Why Is There Anything At All Rather Than Nothing Whatsoever” in Wippel, J. (ed.), The Ultimate Why Question: Why Is There Anything At All Rather Than Nothing Whatsoever? (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press), pp. 84–109.Google Scholar
Wittman, T. R. 2019. God and Creation in the Theology of Thomas Aquinas and Karl Barth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wood, A. 2020. Thomas Aquinas on the Immateriality of the Human Intellect (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar