Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T12:41:51.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - The Obligation to Curb Carbon Emissions

A Right for All or None

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2023

By
Ottavio Quirico
Edited by
Walter F. Baber  and
James R. May
Walter F. Baber
Affiliation:
California State University, Long Beach
James R. May
Affiliation:
Widener University, Delaware Law School
Get access

Summary

The Polar ice caps shrink, ocean currents change, sea level rises and trees flower sooner than expected. Although scientific evidence proves that, owing to anthropogenic activities,1 air temperature is on track to increase beyond 2°C above pre-industrial levels by 2084 (Wang et al., 2018, p. 761) and the time window for addressing the problem is fast shrinking (IPCC, 2018, p. 112; IPCC, 2021, p. 8), all UNFCCC Conferences of the Parties have thus far failed to establish an effective regulatory system. There are indeed States that emit 6,457 million metric tons of CO2 per year (Ritchie & Roser, 2019, CO2 Emissions Per Capita), causing the polar regions to warm twice as fast as the rest of the world (Year of Polar Prediction, 2017).

Type
Chapter
Information
Environmental Human Rights in the Anthropocene
Concepts, Contexts, and Challenges
 , pp. 149 - 173
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

AComHR (2006). Letter from Ariel E. Dulitzky, Assistant Executive Secretary, OAS, to Paul Crowley, Legal Representative for Sheila Watt-Cloutier and Others, regarding Petition P-1413–05.Google Scholar
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide [2007] International Court of Justice Rep 43.Google Scholar
Barcelona Traction Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain) (New Application: 1962) [1970] International Court of Justice Rep 3, at 32, para. 33.Google Scholar
Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), Compensation Owed by the Republic of Nicaragua to the Republic of Costa Rica (Judgment) (2018). International Court of Justice Rep. 15.Google Scholar
Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (1979). Adopted 13 November 1979, 1302 UNTS 1317, in force 16 March 1983.Google Scholar
Copenhagen Accord (2009). Amendment to the List in Annex I to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, adopted 18 December 2009, 2707 UNTS 144.Google Scholar
Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area (Canada v. United States) (Judgment) (1984). International Court of Justice Rep. 246.Google Scholar
Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol (2012). Adopted 8 December 2012, C.N.718.2012.TREATIES-XXVII.7.c.Google Scholar
Furundžija (1998). IT-95-17/1-T, Judgment of 10 December.Google Scholar
Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia) (Judgment) (1997). International Court of Justice Rep. 7.Google Scholar
Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg v. Compagnie Luxembourgeoise de Télédiffusion (1987). 91 International Law Report 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
High Court of Lahore (2015). Case WP No. 25501/2015, Order of 4 September.Google Scholar
ILA (2014). Declaration of Legal Principles Relating to Climate Change, Resolution 2/2014.Google Scholar
ILC (1963). Report to the General Assembly on the Work of Its Fifteenth Session. UN Doc A15509. Yearbook International Law Commission 2, 187.Google Scholar
ILC (1980). Report to the General Assembly on the Work of the Thirty-Second Session. UN Doc. A/35/10. Yearbook International Law Commission 2(2), 1.Google Scholar
ILC (1996). Report to the General Assembly on the Work of the Forty-Eighth Session. UN Doc. A/51/10. Yearbook International Law Commission 2(2), 1.Google Scholar
ILC (2001a). Report to the General Assembly on the Work of the Fifty-Third Session. UN Doc. A/56/10. Yearbook International Law Commission 2(2), 1.Google Scholar
ILC (2001b). Draft Articles on the Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities. Yearbook International Law Commission 2(2), 144.Google Scholar
ILC (2011). Report to the General Assembly on the Work of the Sixty-Third Session. UN Doc. A/66/10. Yearbook International Law Commission 2(2), 1.Google Scholar
ILC (2014). Report to the General Assembly on the Work of the Fifty-Sixth Session. UN Doc. A/69/10.Google Scholar
ILC (2015). Provisional Summary Record of the 3260th Meeting. UN Doc. A/CN.4/SR.3260.Google Scholar
ILC (2018). Report to the General Assembly on the Work of the Seventieth Session. UN Doc. A/73/10 159.Google Scholar
ILC (2019). Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens), Text of the Draft Conclusions and Draft Annex Provisionally Adopted by the Drafting Committee on First Reading. UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.936.Google Scholar
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (2017). Consultative Opinion OC-23/17.Google Scholar
IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014, AR5.Google Scholar
IPCC (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C.Google Scholar
IPCC (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, AR6.Google Scholar
Juliana v. United States (2017). 217 F Supp (3d) 1224, Order of 1 May.Google Scholar
Kyoto Protocol to the UNFCCC (1997). Adopted 11 December 1997, 2303 UNTS 162, in force 16 February 2005.Google Scholar
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion) (1996). International Court of Justice Rep 226.Google Scholar
Paris Agreement (2016). Adopted 12 December 2015, C.N.63.2016.TREATIES-XXVII.7.d, in force 4 November 2016.Google Scholar
Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain (2004). 542 U.S. 692, 762–3.Google Scholar
South West Africa Cases (Ethiopia v. South Africa; Liberia v. South Africa) (Judgment) (1966). International Court of Justice Rep 6, Dissenting Opinion J. Tanaka 250.Google Scholar
The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation (2018). Case n. 200.178.245/01, The Hague Court of Appeal, 9 October.Google Scholar
The State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation (2019). Case n. 19/00135, Court of Cassation, Judgment of 20 December.Google Scholar
Treaties Deposited with the Secretary-General Close to Universal Participation (2016). https://treaties.un.org/doc/source/events/2016/Treaties/list_global_english.pdf.Google Scholar
UN (1986). Declaration on the Right to Development. GA Res. 41/128.Google Scholar
UN (1987). Our Common Future.Google Scholar
UN (2015). Sustainable Development Goals, www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html.Google Scholar
UN Climate Change Secretariat (2014). Negotiations towards New Universal Climate Agreement in 2015 Get Underway, https://unfccc.int/files/press/press_releases_advisories/application/pdf/20141403_adpclose.pdf.Google Scholar
UN HRC (2021). The Human Right to a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment. UN Doc. A/HRC/48/L.23/Rev.1.Google Scholar
UN GA (1988). Protection of Global Climate for Present and Future Generations of Mankind. Res. 43/53.Google Scholar
UNCHE (1972). Report of the UN Conference on Human Environment. UN Doc. A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1 4.Google Scholar
UNEP et al. (2014). Regional Consultation on the Relationship between Human Rights Obligations and Environmental Protection, with a Focus on Constitutional Environmental Rights. Report.Google Scholar
UNESCO (1999). Bizkaia Declaration on the Right to the Environment. UN Doc. 30 C/INF.11.Google Scholar
UNFCCC (1992). Adopted 9 May 1992, 1771 UNTS 107, in force 21 March 1994.Google Scholar
UNTC (2021a). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Status. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-7&chapter=27&Temp=mtdsg3&clang=_en.Google Scholar
UNTC (2021b). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Status. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-7-a&chapter=27&clang=_en.Google Scholar
UNTC (2021c). Paris Agreement, Status. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=XXVII-7-d&chapter=27&clang=_en.Google Scholar
Urgenda Foundation v. The Netherlands (2015). Case n. HAZA C/09/00456689, Judgment of 24 June.Google Scholar
Urgenda, Global Climate Litigation. www.urgenda.nl/en/themas/climate-case/global-climate-litigation.Google Scholar
Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer (1985). Adopted 22 March 1985, 1513 UNTS 293, in force 22 September 1988.Google Scholar
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969). Adopted 23 May 1969, 1155 UNTS 331, in force 27 January 1980.Google Scholar
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organisations or between International Organisations (1986). Adopted 21 March 1986, UN Doc. A/CONF.129/15, not yet into force.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Ago, R. (1976). Fifth Report on State Responsibility: The Internationally Wrongful Act of the State, Source of International Responsibility. UN Doc. A/CN.4/291 and Add.1 & 2. Yearbook International Law Commission 2(1), pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, G. (1992). Fourth Report to the International Law Commission on State Responsibility. UN Doc. A/CN.4/444 and Add. 1–3. Yearbook International Law Commission 2(1), pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, G. (1995). Seventh Report to the International Law Commission on State Responsibility. UN Doc. A/CN.4/469 and Add.1–2. Yearbook International Law Commission 2(1), pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (2013). Climate Change and Human Rights. WIRES Climate Change 4(3), pp. 159–70.Google Scholar
Berat, L. (1993). Defending the Right to a Healthy Environment: Toward a Crime of Genocide in International Law. Boston University International Law Journal 11(2), pp. 327–48.Google Scholar
Beyerlin, U. and Marauhn, T. (2011). International Environmental Law. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Birnie, P. et al. (2009). International Law and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D. (2011). Prologue to a Theory of Non-Treaty Norms. In Arsanjani, M. et al., eds., Looking to the Future. Leiden: Brill, pp. 119–35.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. (2012). The Environmental Rights Revolution. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. (2019). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations Relating to the Enjoyment of a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment. UN Doc. A/74/161.Google Scholar
Brunnée, J. (2012). The Global Climate Regime: Wither Common Concern? In Hestermeyer, H. et al., eds., Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity. Leiden: Nijhoff, vol. 1, pp. 721–36.Google Scholar
Byrne, M. (2010). Climate Crime: Can Responsibility for Climate Change Damage Be Criminalised? Carbon & Climate Law Review 4(3), pp. 278–90.Google Scholar
Carbonnier, J. (1987). Sociologie juridique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cassese, A. (2010). The Character of the Violated Obligation. In Crawford, J. et al., eds., The Law of International Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 415–20.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. (2000). Third Report to the International Law Commission on State Responsibility. UN Doc. A/CN.4/507. Yearbook International Law Commission 2(1), pp. 3–111.Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J. (2015). Non-State Actors and the Social Practice of International Law. In Noortmann, M., Reinisch, A. and Ryngaert, C., eds., Non-State Actors in International Law. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 11–31.Google Scholar
Daly, E. and May, J. (2018). Learning from Constitutional Environmental Rights. In Knox, J. and Pejan, R., eds., The Human Right to a Healthy Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 42–58.Google Scholar
Davis, J.S. (2005). State Responsibility for Global Climate Change: The Case of the Maldives. MA Thesis, The Fletcher School. Available at: dl.tufts.edu.Google Scholar
Donnelly, J. (2013). Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, E. (1913). Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts. München: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
EU Observer (2009). Arctic Council Rejects EU’s Observer Application. https://euobserver.com/environment/28043.Google Scholar
Euler, L., 1760, Recherches générales sur la mortalité et la multiplication du genre humain. Histoire del’Académie royale des sciences et des belles lettres de Berlin, 16, 144–164.Google Scholar
Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations (2015a). Oslo Principles on Global Obligations to Reduce Climate Change. https://globaljustice.yale.edu/oslo-principles-global-climate-change-obligations.Google Scholar
Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations (2015b). Commentary to the Oslo Principles on Global Obligations to Reduce Climate Change.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M. (2004). The Kyoto Protocol Compliance Regime and Treaty Law. Singapore Year Book of International Law 8, pp. 23–40.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M. (2010). Responsibility and Climate Change. German Yearbook of International Law 53, pp. 89–138.Google Scholar
General Assembly (2016). Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. UN Doc. A/RES/71/133.Google Scholar
Giorgetti, C. (1998). The Role of Nongovernmental Organizations in the Climate Change Negotiations. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy 9, pp. 115–37.Google Scholar
Government of the Netherlands (2019). Climate Policy. www.government.nl/topics/climate-change/climate-policy.Google Scholar
Hamilton, P. (2008). Counter[measur]ing Climate Change: The ILC, Third State Countermeasures and Climate Change. McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law & Policy 4(2), pp. 83–131.Google Scholar
Hilson, C. (2020). Hitting the Target? Analysing the Use of Targets in Climate Law. Journal of Environmental Law 32(2), pp. 195–220.Google Scholar
Horn, L. (2004). The Implications of the Concept of Common Concern of a Human Kind on a Human Right to a Healthy Environment. Macquarie Journal of International and Comparative Environmental Law 1(2), pp. 233–68.Google Scholar
Horn, L. (2015). Climate Change and the Future Role of the Concept of the Common Concern of Humankind. Australian Journal of Environmental Law 2(1), pp. 24–56.Google Scholar
ICE Coalition (1992). Draft Statute of the International Environmental Agency and the International Court of the Environment.Google Scholar
ICE Coalition (2012). Call for Action from Lawyers and Environmental Law Organizations.Google Scholar
Kadelbach, S. (2015). Genesis, Function and Identification of Jus Cogens Norms. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 46, pp. 147–72.Google Scholar
Kalinowski, G. (1972). Études de logique déontique. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Kellow, A. and Murphy-Gregory, H. (2018). Handbook of Research on NGOs. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1934). Reine Rechtslehre: Einleitung in die rechtswissenschaftliche Problematik. Mohr Siebrek Ek.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1966). Principles of International Law. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
Knox, J. (2012). Preliminary Report on Human Rights and the Environment. UN Doc. A/HRC/22/43.Google Scholar
Knox, J. (2016). Report on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations Relating to the Enjoyment of a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment. UN Doc. A/HRC/31/52.Google Scholar
Knox, J. (2018). Report on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations Relating to the Enjoyment of a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment. UN Doc A/73/188.Google Scholar
Kolb, R. (2015). Peremptory International Law – Jus Cogens: A General Inventory. London: Hart.Google Scholar
Kotzé, L. (2015). Constitutional Conversations in the Anthropocene: In Search of Environmental Jus Cogens Norms. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 46, pp. 241–71.Google Scholar
Kotzé, L. (2016). Global Environmental Constitutionalism in the Anthropocene. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Kotzé, L. (2018). In Search of a Right to a Healthy Environment in International Law. In Knox, J., and Pejan, R., eds., The Human Right to a Healthy Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 136–54.Google Scholar
Ksentini, F. (1994). Human Rights and the Environment. UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1994/9.Google Scholar
Linderfalk, U. (2011). International Legal Hierarchy Revisited: The Status of Obligations Erga Omnes. Nordic Journal of International Law 80(1), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1689). Two Treatises of Government.Google Scholar
Lopes Peña, O. (1998). Counter-claims and Obligations Erga Omnes before the International Court of Justice. European Journal of International Law 9(4), pp. 724–36.Google Scholar
Magraw, D. and Wienhöfer, K. (2018). The Malé Formulation of the Overarching Environmental Human Right. In Knox, J. and Pejan, R., eds., The Human Right to a Healthy Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215–35.Google Scholar
Mayer, B. (2018). The International Law on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Minister of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy (2019). Letter to the House of Representatives about the Proposal for a National Climate Agreement. www.government.nl/topics/climate-change/documents/parliamentary-documents/2019/06/28/letter-to-the-house-of-representatives-about-the-proposal-for-a-national-climate-agreement.Google Scholar
Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933). Adopted 26 December 1933, 165 LNTS 19, in force 26 December 1934.Google Scholar
Morton, T. (2017). Humankind: Solidarity with Non-Human People. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Murase, S. (2014). First Report to the International Law Commission. UN Doc. A/CN.4/667.Google Scholar
Murase, S. (2015). Second Report to the International Law Commission on the Protection of the Atmosphere. UN Doc. A/CN.4/681.Google Scholar
Neukom, R. et al. (2019). No Evidence for Globally Coherent Warm and Cold Periods over the Preindustrial Common Era. Nature 571, pp. 550–4.Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, A. (2006). Peremptory Norms in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pellet, A. (1999). Can a State Commit a Crime? Definitely, Yes! European Journal of International Law 10(2), pp. 425–34.Google Scholar
Pellet, A. (2012). Article 38. In Zimmermann, A. et al., eds., The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 731.Google Scholar
Ragazzi, M. (1997). The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Riphagen, W. (1983). State Responsibility: New Theories of Obligation in Interstate Relations. In St John MacDonald, R. and Millar Johnston, D., eds., The Structure and Process of International Law. The Hague: Nijhoff, p. 581.Google Scholar
Ritchie, H. and Roser, M. (2019). CO₂ and Other Greenhouse Gas Emissions. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions.Google Scholar
Rozakis, C. (1976). The Concept of Jus Cogens in the Law of Treaties. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Scelle, G. (1932). Précis de droit des gens: Principes et systématique. Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar
Schiermeier, Q. (4 November 2020). The US Left the Paris Climate Deal: What’s Next? Nature, www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03066-x.Google Scholar
Schwarte, C. and Frank, W. (2014). The International Law Association’s Legal Principles on Climate Change and Climate Liability under Public International Law. Climate Law 4(2–4), p. 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, D. (1991). Human Rights, Environmental Rights, and the Right to Environment. Stanford Journal of International Law 28(1), pp. 103–38.Google Scholar
Sixth Committee of the General Assembly (2019). Topical Summary of the Discussion Held in the During the Seventy-Third Session on The Work of the ILC of Its Seventieth Session. UN Doc. A/CN.4/724.Google Scholar
Stallard, H. (2009). Turning up the Heat on Tuvalu: An Assessment of Potential Compensation for Climate Change Damage in Accordance with State Responsibility under International Law. Canterbury Law Review 15, pp. 163–203.Google Scholar
Stevenson, John R. (1952). Relationship of Private International Law to Public International Law. Columbia Law Review 52(5), pp. 561–88.Google Scholar
Tladi, D. (2017). Second Report to the International Law Commission on Jus Cogens. UN Doc. A/CN.4/706.Google Scholar
Tladi, D. (2019). Fourth Report to the International Law Commission on Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens). UN Doc A/CN.4/727.Google Scholar
Tol, R. and Verheyen, R. (2004). State Responsibility and Compensation for Climate Change Damages – A Legal and Economic Assessment. Energy Policy 32(9), pp. 1109–30.Google Scholar
Trump, Donald (2017). Statement by President Trump on the Paris Climate Accord. www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-president-trump-paris-climate-accord.Google Scholar
Tunkin, G. (1993). Is General International Law Customary Law Only? European Journal of International Law 4(4), pp. 534–41.Google Scholar
Venn, J. (1880). On the Diagrammatic and Mechanical Representation of Propositions and Reasonings. Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 10(59), pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X. et al. (2018). Climate Change of 4°C Global Warming above Pre-industrial Levels. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 35, pp. 757–70.Google Scholar
Weatherall, T. (2015). Jus Cogens: International Law and Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×