Book contents
- Anti-Constitutional Populism
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Anti-Constitutional Populism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Anti-Constitutional Populism
- I Populisms
- II Courts
- III Anti-Constitutionalism After Post-Communism
- Chapter 8 Conservative Populism in Defiance of Anti-Totalitarian Constitutional Democracy
- Chapter 9 Constitutional Populism and the Rule of Law in Poland
- Chapter 10 Populism or Authoritarianism? A Plaidoyer Against Illiberal or Authoritarian Constitutionalism
- IV Eu Responses
- V Concluding Reflections
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
Chapter 10 - Populism or Authoritarianism? A Plaidoyer Against Illiberal or Authoritarian Constitutionalism
from III - Anti-Constitutionalism After Post-Communism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 March 2022
By
Book contents
- Anti-Constitutional Populism
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Anti-Constitutional Populism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Anti-Constitutional Populism
- I Populisms
- II Courts
- III Anti-Constitutionalism After Post-Communism
- Chapter 8 Conservative Populism in Defiance of Anti-Totalitarian Constitutional Democracy
- Chapter 9 Constitutional Populism and the Rule of Law in Poland
- Chapter 10 Populism or Authoritarianism? A Plaidoyer Against Illiberal or Authoritarian Constitutionalism
- IV Eu Responses
- V Concluding Reflections
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
Summary
In an infamous speech delivered on July 26, 2014, the populist and autocratic Prime Minister Viktor Orbán proclaimed his intention to turn Hungary into a state that ‘will undertake the odium of expressing that in character it is not of liberal nature’. Citing as models he added:
We have abandoned liberal methods and principles of organizing society, as well as the liberal way to look at the world … Today, the stars of international analyses are Singapore, China, India, Turkey, Russia … and if we think back on what we did in the last four years, and what we are going to do in the following four years, then it really can be interpreted from this angle. We are … parting ways with Western European dogmas, making ourselves independent from them … If we look at civil organizations in Hungary … we have to deal with paid political activists here … [T]hey would like to exercise influence … on Hungarian public life. It is vital, therefore, that if we would like to reorganize our nation state instead of it being a liberal state, that we should make it clear, that these are not civilians … opposing us, but political activists attempting to promote foreign interests … This is about the ongoing reorganization of the Hungarian state. Contrary to the liberal state organization logic of the past twenty years, this is a state organization originating in national interests.1
Liberalism gave rise to political correctness—that is, to a form of totalitarianism, which is the opposite of democracy. That’s why I believe that illiberalism restores true freedom, true democracy.2
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Anti-Constitutional Populism , pp. 366 - 398Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Ackerman, Bruce, We the People, Volume 1: Foundations (Harvard University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Alviar García, Helena, ‘Neoliberalism as a Form of Authoritarian Constitutionalism’ in García, Helena Alviar and Frankenberg, Günter (eds) Authoritarian Constitutionalism: Comparative analysis and Critique (Edward Elgar, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antal, Attila, ‘The Rebirth of the Political - A Schmittian Moment in Hungary’ (Transcript of a lecture, Polska Fundacja im. Roberta Schumana, Warsaw, 6 November 2017) academia.edu/35061692/The_Rebirth_of_the_Political_A_Schmittian_Moment_in_Hungary_Transcript_of_LectureGoogle Scholar
Arato, Andrew, ‘Political Theology and Populism’ (2013) 80(1) Social Research 143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arato, Andrew, ‘Populism, Constitutional Courts and Civil Society’ in Langfried, Christine (ed) Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations (Cambridge University Press, 2019)Google Scholar
Balázs, Zoltán, ‘Political Theory in Hungary after the Regime Change’ (2014) 7(1) International Political Anthropology 5Google Scholar
Balogh, Éva S ‘Orbán, the New Jesus Delivers His Sermon on the Mount’ Hungarian Spectrum (15 September 2019)Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah, ‘To Define Populism,’ (The Isaiah Berlin Virtual Library, Isaiah Berlin 1968, The Isaiah Berlin Literary Trust 2013) berlin.wolf.ox.ac.uk/lists/bibliography/bib111bLSE.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bielefeld, Heiner, ‘Deconstruction of the Rule of Law: Carl Schmitt’s Philosophy of the Policial’ (1996) 82 Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophy 379Google Scholar
Bielefeld, Heiner, ‘Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism: Systematic Reconstruction and Countercriticism’ (1997) 10(1) Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 65Google Scholar
Bozóki, András and Hegedűs, Dániel, ‘An Externally Constrained Hybrid Regime: Hungary in the European Union’ (2018) 25(7) Democratization 1173Google Scholar
Castillo-Ortiz, Pablo, ‘The Illiberal Abuse of Constitutional Courts in Europe’ (2019) 15(1) European Constitutional Law Review 48Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L, ‘What’s Wrong with the Normative Theory (and the Actual Practice) of Left Populism?’ (2019) 26 Constellations 391Google Scholar
Corso, Lucia, ‘What Does Populism Have to Do with Constitutional Law? Discussing Populist Constitutionalism and Its Assumptions’ (2014) 2 Rivista di filosofia del Diritto 443Google Scholar
Czarnota, Adam, ‘The Constitutional Tribunal’ Verfassungsblog (3 June 2017) verfassungsblog.de/the-constitutional-tribunal/Google Scholar
Dénes, Albert ‘Hungarian government outraged after Donald Tusk claims prominent Nazi would be “proud” of PM Orbán’ on Remix (undated) rmx.news/article/article/hungarian-government-outraged-after-donald-tusk-claims-prominent-nazi-would-be-proud-of-pm-orbanGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry ‘Democracy Demotion: How the Freedom Agenda Fell Apart’ Foreign Affairs (July/August 2019)Google Scholar
Ewing, Keith D, ‘The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy’ (1999) 62 Modern Law Review 79Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley, ‘There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech and It’s a Good Thing, Too’ (1992) 17(1) Boston Review 1Google Scholar
Flinders, Matthew, ‘Shifting the Balance? Parliament, the Executive and the British Constitution’ (2002) 50(1) Political Studies 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankenberg, Günter, ‘Authoritarian Constitutionalism: Coming to Terms with Modernity’s Nightmares’ in Garcia, Helena Alviar and Frankenberg, Günter (eds) Authoritarian Constitutionalism: Comparative analysis and Critique (Edward Elgar, 2019)Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J, Constitutional Governance and Democracy: Theory and Practice in Europe and America (Blaisdell, 4th ed, 1968)Google Scholar
Fusaro, Carlo, and Oliver, Dawn, ‘Towards a Theory of Constitutional Change’ in Oliver, Dawn and Fusaro, Carlo (eds) How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study (Hart, 2011)Google Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen, The Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice (Cambridge, 2013 )Google Scholar
Gargarella, Roberto, Latin American Constitutionalism 1810–2010: The Engine Room of the Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom and Simpser, Alberto, Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes (Cambridge, 2014)Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, ‘Abuse of Constitutional Identity: The Hungarian Constitutional Court on Interpretation of Article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law’ (2018) 43(1) Review of Central and East European Law 23Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, ‘Populism, Authoritarianism and Constitutionalism’ (2019) 20(3) German Law Journal 296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, ‘How COVID-19 Unveils the True Autocrats: Viktor Orbán’s Ermächtigungsgesetz’ (2020) I-CONnect (1 April 2020) iconnectblog.com/2020/04/how-covid-19-unveils-the-true-autocrats-viktor-orbans-ermachtigungsgesetz/Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor and Scheppele, Kim Lane, ‘Don’t Be Fooled by Autocrats! Why Hungary’s Emergency Violates Rule of Law’ Verfassungsblog (22 April 2020) verfassungsblog.de/dont-be-fooled-by-autocrats/Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, Gábor Mészáros and Kim Lane Scheppele, ‘From Emergency to Disaster’ Verfassungsblog (30 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/from-emergency-to-disaster/Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor and Kim Lane, Scheppele, ‘Orbán Is Still the Sole Judge of His Own Law Verfassungsblog (30 April 2020) verfassungsblog.de/orban-is-still-the-sole-judge-of-his-own-law/Google Scholar
Halmai, Gábor, Mészáros, Gábor and Scheppele, Kim Lane, ‘So It Goes – Part I’ (2020) Verfassungsblog (19 November 2020) verfassungsblog.de/so-it-goes-part-i/Google Scholar
Heller, Hermann, ‘Authoritarian Liberalism?’ (1933) 44 Die Neue Rundschau 289; tr Bonnie Litschewski Paulson, Stanley L Paulson and Alexander Somek (2015) 21(3) European Law Journal 295Google Scholar
Hiebert, , Janet, , ‘Parliamentary Bill of Rights: An Alternative Model?’ (2006) 69(1) Modern Law Review 7Google Scholar
Iancu, Bogdan, ‘Separation of Powers and the Rule of Law in Romania: The Crisis in Concepts and Contexts’ in Bogdandy, Armin von and Sonnevend, Pál (eds) Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area: Theory, Law and Politics in Hungary and Romania (Hart Publishing, 2015)Google Scholar
Isiksel, Turkuler, ‘Between Text and Context: Turkey’s Tradition of Authoritarian Constitutionalism’ (2013) 11(3) International Journal of Constitutional Law 702Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian, and Ghaleigh, Navraj Singh (eds) Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and Its Legal Traditions (Hart Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar
Judge, David, ‘Whatever Happened to Parliamentary Democracy in the United Kingdom?’ (2004) 57(3) Parliamentary Affairs 682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavanaugh, Aileen, ‘Participation and Judicial Review: A Reply to Jeremy Waldron’ (2003) 22 Law and Philosophy 45Google Scholar
Körösényi, András, ‘Weber és az Orbán-rezsim: plebiszciter vezéremokrácia Magyarországon’ [Weber and the Orbán-regime: Plebisciter Leader Democracy in Hungary] (2017) 26(4) Politikatudományi Szemle 7Google Scholar
Kumm, Matthias, ‘Rethinking Constitutional Authority: On Structure and Limits of Constitutional Pluralism’ in Avbelj, Matej and Komárek, Jan (eds) Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Hart Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias, ‘Demokratie als verfassungsfeindlicher Topos’ Verfassungsblog (6 September 2017) verfassungsblog.de/demokratie-als-verfassungsfeindlicher-topos/Google Scholar
Law, David S, and Versteeg, Mila, ‘Sham Constitutions’ (2013) 101 California Law Review 863Google Scholar
Lálik, Tomás, ‘Constitutional Crisis in Slovakia: Still Far from Resolution’ I-CONnect (5 August 2016) iconnectblog.com/2016/08/constitutional-court-crisis-in-slovakia-still-far-away-from-resolution/Google Scholar
Lepsius, Oliver, ‘The Problem of Perceptions of National Socialist Law or: Was There A Constitutional Theory of National Socialism?’ in Joerges, Christian and Ghaleigh, Navraj Singh (eds) Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and Its Legal Traditions (Hart Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan A, ‘The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism’ (2002) 13(2) Journal of Democracy 51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy, Bernard-Henri, ‘How an Anti-totalitarian Militant Discovered Ultranationalism: After 30 Years, I Spoke with Viktor Orbán Again.’ The Atlantic (13 May 2019) theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/05/bernard-henri-levy-interviews-viktor-orban/589102/Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (Yale University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
McIlwain, Charles Howard Constitutionalism, Ancient and Modern (Cornell University Press, 1940)Google Scholar
Morawski, Lech, ‘A Critical Response’ Verfassungsblog (3 June 2017) verfassungsblog.de/a-critical-response/Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F, ‘Constitutions, Constitutionalism and Democracy’ in Greenberg, Douglas, Katz, Stanley N, Oliviero, Melanie Beth and Wheatley, Steven C (eds) Constitutionalism and Democracy: Transitions in the Contemporary World (Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Orbán, Viktor, ‘A Tavares jelentés egy baloldali akció [The Tavares report is a leftist action] Interview with PM Viktor Orbán’ Hungarian Public Radio, Kossuth Rádió (5 July 2013).Google Scholar
Orbán, Viktor, ‘Speech at Băile Tuşnad (Tusnádfürdő) of 26 July 2014’ Budapest Beacon (29 July 2014), budapestbeacon.com/full-text-of-viktor-orbans-speech-at-baile-tusnad-tusnadfurdo-of-26-july-2014/.Google Scholar
Ortega, Roberto Niembro, ‘Conceptualizing Authoritarian Constitutionalism’ (2016) 49(4) Verfassung und Recht in Übersee 339Google Scholar
Parker, Richard D, ‘“Here, the People Rule”: A Constitutional Populist Manifesto’ (1993) 27 Valparaiso University Law Review 531Google Scholar
Perju, Vlad, ‘The Romanian Double Executive and the 2012 Constitutional Crisis’ (2015) 13(1) International Journal of Constitutional Law 246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pin, Andrea, ‘The Transnational Drivers of Populist Backlash in Europe: The Role of the Courts’ 20(2) German Law Journal 225Google Scholar
Pokol, Béla, The Juristocratic State: Its Victory and the Possibility of Taming (Dialóg Campus Kiadó, 2017)Google Scholar
Pócza, Kálmán, Dobos, Gábor and Gyulai, Attila ‘The Hungarian Constitutional Court: A constructive partner in constitutional dialogue’ in Pócza, Kálmán (ed) Constitutional Politics and the Judiciary: Decision-Making in Central and Eastern Europe (Routledge, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, ‘Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to Democracy’ in O’Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe C and Whitehead, Laurence (eds) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Roach, Kent, ‘Dialogic Judicial Review and Its Critics’ (2004) 23 Supreme Court Law Review: Second Series 49Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni, ‘Constitutionalism: A Preliminary Discussion’ (1962) 56(4) American Political Science Review 853Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni, Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes (Palgrave MacMillan, 2nd ed, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sajó, András and Uitz, Renáta, The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane, ‘Autocratic Legalism’ (2018) 85(2) University of Chicago Law Review 545Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, ‘Der Führer schützt das Recht: Zur Reichstagsrede von Adolf Hitler vom 13 Juli 1934’ [The Führer Protects the Law: On Adolf Hitler’s Reichstag Address of 13 July 1934] ARPLAN (15 June 2019) tr Clara Teresa Picker and John P McCormick arplan.org/2019/06/15/SCHMITT-FUHRER-LAW/Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political: Expanded Edition (University of Chicago Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somek, Alexander Somek, ‘Authoritarian Constitutionalism: Austrian Constitutional Doctrine 1933–1938 and Its Legacy’ in Joerges, Christian and Ghaleigh, Navraj Singh (eds) Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and Its Legal Traditions (Hart Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar
Stopler, Gila, ‘Constitutional Capture in Israel’ I-CONnect (21 August 21 2017) iconnectblog.com/2017/08/constitutional-capture-israel/Google Scholar
Stumpf, István, Erős Állam – Alkotmányos Korlátok [Strong State – Constitutional Limits] (Századvég, 2014)Google Scholar
Tellér, Gyula, Született-e Orbán-rendszer 2010 és 2014 között? [Was an Orbán System Born between 2010 and 2014?] (2014) 59(3) Nagyvilág 346Google Scholar
Thio, Li-Ann, ‘Constitutionalism in Illiberal Polities’ in Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András (eds) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Tóth, Gábor Attila, ‘Constitutional Markers of Authoritarianism’ (2019) 11 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 37Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, ‘Alternative Forms of Judicial Review’ (2003) 101(8) Michigan Law Review 2781Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, ‘Editorial: Varieties of Constitutionalism’ (2016) 14(1) International Journal of Constitutional Law 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varga, András Zs, From Ideal to Idol? The Concept of the Rule of Law (Dialóg Campus, 2019)Google Scholar
Vincze, Attila, ‘Az Alkotmánybíróság határozata az Alaptörvény negyedik módosításáról: az alkotmánymódosítás alkotmánybírósági kontrollja’ [The Decision of the Constitutional Court on the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law: The Constitutional Review of Constitutional Amendments] (2013) 3 Jogesetek Magyarázata 3Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, ‘The Core of the Case against Judicial Review’ (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal 1348Google Scholar
Way, Lucan Ahmad and Levitsky, Steven ‘How autocrats can rig the game and damage democracy’ The Washington Post (4 January 2019) washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2019/01/04/how-do-you-know-when-a-democracy-has-slipped-over-into-autocracy/Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Michael A, ‘Authoritarian Liberalism as Authoritarian Constitutionalism’ in (García, Helena Alviar and Frankenberg, Günter (eds) Authoritarian Constitutionalism: Comparative Analysis and Critique (Edward Elgar, 2019)Google Scholar
Young, Alison L, Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act (Hart Publishing, 2009)Google Scholar