Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T16:12:54.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Counseling Embryo Donors and Recipients

from III - Third Party Reproduction: Assessment and Preparation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2022

By
Elaine Gordon  and
Maya Grobel
Edited by
Sharon N. Covington
Sharon N. Covington
Affiliation:
Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, MD
Get access

Summary

Embryo donation is a unique and novel disposition option and family-building choice for patients. While there are an estimated one million surplus embryos cryopreserved around the world, embryo donation cases remain low. At the same time, interest in embryo donation is on the rise, as an increasing number of patients consider alternative methods of family creation. The heightened interest in embryo donation necessitates skilled fertility counselors to provide education and counseling to patients on both the donor and recipient side. Potential embryo donors often struggle with decision making around the disposition of their remaining embryos, while potential recipients may grapple with the notion of nongenetic parenting and their relationship to their donors and their donor-conceived children. The fertility counselor can play an integral role in helping patients navigate their decision making and their new relationships and family structure. This chapter explores the historical, logistical, psychosocial and relational considerations of embryo donation. The chapter highlights the important role of the fertility counselor throughout an embryo donation journey, and offers frameworks, best practices, and therapeutic tools that counselors can utilize as they work to support their patients.

Keywords

embryo donationeducationpsychosociallogisticsarrangement optionsfamily conceptualizationframeworksthird-partydonor conceptiondonor conceived
Type
Chapter
Information
Fertility Counseling: Clinical Guide , pp. 115 - 124
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lyerly, AD, Steinhauser, K, Namey, E, et al. Factors that affect infertility patients’ decisions about disposition of frozen embryos. Fertil Steril 2006;85:1623–1630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deniz, S, Hughes, E, Neal, M, Faghih, M, Amin, S, Karnis, M. Are health care providers adequately educating couples for embryo disposition decisions? Fertil Steril 2016;105(3):684–689.Google Scholar
Lyerly, AD, Steinhauser, K, Voils, C, et al. Fertility patients’ views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey. Fertil Steril 2008;93(2):499–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMahon, C, Saunders, D. Attitudes of couples with stored frozen embryos toward conditional embryo donation. Fertil Steril 2009;91(1):140–147.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Defining embryo donation: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2016;106(1):15–282.Google Scholar
ASRM Ethics Committee Opinion Fertility and Sterility. Interest, obligation and rights in gamete and embryo donation. Fertil Steril 2019;111(4):15–282.Google Scholar
Global Reproductive Health. International Federation of Fertility Societies’ Surveillance (IFFS) 2019: Global Trends in Reproductive Policy and Practice. 2019.Google Scholar
Nachtigall, RD, Becker, G, Friese, C, Butler, A, MacDougall, K. Parents’ conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertil Steril 2005;84(2):431–434.Google Scholar
McMahon, C, Gibson, F, Cohen, J, Leslie, G, Tennant, C, Saunders, D. Mothers conceiving through in vitro fertilization: siblings, setbacks, and embryo dilemmas. Reprod Technol 2000;10 :131–135.Google Scholar
Stiel, M, McMahon, C, Elwyn, G, Boivin, J. Pre-birth characteristics and 5-year follow-up of women with cryopreserved embryos after successful in vitro fertilisation treatment. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2010;31(1):32–39.Google Scholar
Golombok, S. We Are Family: The Modern Transformation of Parents and Children. New York, NY: Public Affairs, 2020.Google Scholar
Golombok, S. Modern Families: Parents and Children in New Family Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
International Federation of Fertility Societies’ Surveillance (IFFS) 2019: Global Trends in Reproductive Policy and Practice. Global Reprod Health 2019;4(1):29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. White Paper: Access to Care Summit. 2015. Available from: www.asrm.org/globalassets/asrm/asrm-content/news-and-publications/news-and-research/press-releases-and-bulletins/pdf/atcwhitepaper.pdf [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
Quinn, M, Fujimoto, V. Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology access and outcomes. Fertil Steril 2016;105:1119–1123.Google Scholar
Human Fertilization & Embryology Authority. Ethnic Diversity in Fertility Treatment 2018: UK Ethnicity Statistics for IVF and DI Fertility Treatment. 2021. Available from: www.hfea.gov.uk/about-us/publications/research-and-data/ethnic-diversity-in-fertility-treatment-2018/ [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
EMPOWER with Moxi. Video 4: The Empower Method (Video Series]). 2019. Available from: www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYujv07ELxY [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
Feingold, ML. Infertility, Reproductive Medicine, and the Role of the Psychologist. 2007. Available from: www.madelinefeingoldphd.com/infertility-reproductive-medicine-and-the-role-of-the-psychologist/ [last accessed June 16, 2022].Google Scholar
Klock, SC, Sheinin, S, Kazer, RR. The disposition of unused frozen embryos [letter]. N Engl J Med 2001;345:69–70.Google Scholar
de Lacey, S. Parent identity and ‘virtual’ children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos. Hum Reprod 2005;20(6):1661–1669. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh831Google Scholar
Baran, A, Pannor, R. Lethal Secrets: The Psychology of Donor Insemination: Problems and Solutions. Las Vegas, NV: Triadoption Publications, 2008.Google Scholar
Erikson, EH. Identity and the Life Cycle: Selected Papers. New York, NY: International Universities Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×