Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T16:55:25.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Life-Cycle Corrosion Assessment and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2022

Jeom Kee Paik
Jeom Kee Paik
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Ship-shaped offshore installations deteriorate over time. This deterioration leads to significant problems in terms of safety, health and the environment and may require substantial financial expenditure to remedy. Moreover, age-related deterioration has reportedly been a factor in many failures (including total losses) of ships and offshore structures.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
Design, Construction, Operation, Healthcare and Decommissioning
 , pp. 400 - 444
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu–Khader, M. M., Badran, O. and Attarakih, M. (2011). ‘Ballast water treatment technologies: Hydrocyclonic a viable option’. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 13: 403–413.Google Scholar
Boon, B., Buisman, B. C., Luijendijk, T. and Vonk, R. (1998). ‘The influence of corrosion on the strength of ship structures’. Proceedings of the 1998 European Corrosion Congress, Utrecht, 28 September–1 October.Google Scholar
Chapkis, D. T. (1967). ‘Simulation of pitting corrosion of hull plating under static loading’. Trudy TSNIIMF, 82: 34–50.Google Scholar
Daidola, J. C., Parente, J., Mat, K. T. and Orisamolu, I. R. (1997). Residual Strength Assessment of Pitted Plate Panels. Report No. SSC–394, Ship Structure Committee, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Dante, J. (2017). Accelerated Dynamic Corrosion Test Method Development. Final Report of SERDP Project WP-1673 for Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Devanney, J. (2006). The Tankship Tromedy: The Impending Disasters in Tankers. Center for Tankship Excellence (CTX) Press, Tavernier, FL.Google Scholar
DNV (2017a). Corrosion Protection of Ships. Class Guideline DNV–CG–0288, Det Norske Veritas, Oslo.Google Scholar
DNV (2017b). Cathodic Protection Design. DNV–RP–B401, Det Norske Veritas, Oslo.Google Scholar
Eliasson, J. (2003). ‘Economics of coatings / corrosion protection of ships’. Proceedings of Lloyd’s Register Conference on the Prevention and Management of Marine Corrosion, London, 2–3 April.Google Scholar
Ellinas, C. P., Supple, W. J. and Walker, A. C. (1984). Buckling of Offshore Structures: A State-of-the-Art Review. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
Emi, H., Matoba, M., Arima, T. and Umino, M. (1994). ‘Corrosion protection system for long ships’ water ballast tanks’. Proceedings of International Conference on Marine Corrosion Prevention, Paper No. 15, The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, London, 11–12 October.Google Scholar
Faber, M. H. and Melchers, R. E. (2001). ‘Aspects of safety in design and assessment of deteriorating structures safety’. Proceedings of the 2001 IABSE Conference on Trends in Engineering, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Malta, 161–166, 21–23 March.Google Scholar
Flaks, V. Y. (1978). ‘Correlation of pitting corrosion of aluminum plates and reduction of load-bearing capacity under tension’. Fiziko–Khimicheskaya Mekhanika Materialov, 14(1): 89–93.Google Scholar
Flores, S. and Morcillo, M. (1999). ‘Anticipated levels of soluble salts remaining on rusty steel prior to painting’. Surface Coatings International, 82(1): 19–25.Google Scholar
Friar, D. E. (2001). ‘A new concept in corrosion protection for ships hulls’. Proceedings of International Conference on Marine Corrosion Prevention, Paper No. 8, The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, London, 11–12 October.Google Scholar
IACS (2017). Bulk Carriers: Gguidelines for Surveys, Assessments, and Repair of Hull Structures. International Association of Classification Societies, London.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. R. (1999). ‘A primary cause of coating failure’. Materials Performance, 38(6): 48–49.Google Scholar
Lambourne, R. and Strivens, T. A. (1999). Paint and Surface Coatings: Theory and Practice. William Andrew Publishing, Norwich, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., Baek, S., Boo, C., Son, A., Jung, H., Park, S. S. and Hong, S. W. (2020). ‘Water deoxygenation using a hollow fiber membrane contactor to prevent pipe corrosion for sustainable management of district heating systems: A pilot-scale study’. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, doi: 0.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124049.Google Scholar
Martin, J. W., Saunders, S. C., Floyd, F. L. and Wineburg, J. P. (1996). Methodologies for Predicting the Service Lives of Coating Systems. Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology, Blue Bell, PA.Google Scholar
Matsuda, M., Kobayashi, S., Miyuki, H. and Yoshida, S. (1999). An Anticorrosion Method for Ballast Tanks Using Nitrogen Gas. Ship and Ocean Foundation, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Melchers, R. E. (2018). ‘Progress in developing realistic corrosion models’. Structure and Infrastructure, 14(7): 843–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchers, R. E. and Jiang, X. (2006). ‘Estimation of models for durability of epoxy coatings in water ballast tanks’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 1(1): 61–70.Google Scholar
Melchers, R. E. and Paik, J. K. (2009). ‘Effect of tensile strain on the rate of marine corrosion of steel plates’. Corrosion Science, 51: 2298–2303.Google Scholar
Miller, A. W., Frazier, M., Smith, G. E., Perry, E. S., Ruiz, G. M. and Tamburri, M. N. (2011). ‘Enumerating sparse organisms in ship’s ballast water: Why counting to 10 is not so easy’. Environmental Science & Technology, 45: 3539–3546.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2004). ‘Corrosion analysis of seawater ballast tanks’. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 146(Part A1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2018). Ultimate Limit State Analysis and Design of Plated Structures. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2020). Advanced Structural Safety Studies with Extreme Conditions and Accidents. Springer, Singapore.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Brennan, F., Carlsen, C. A., Daley, C., Garbatov, Y., Ivanov, L., Rizzo, C. M., Simonsen, B. C., Yamamoto, N. and Zhuang, H. Z. (2006). Condition Assessment of Aged Ships. Report of the ISSC Specialist Committee V.6, International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress, Southampton University Press, Southampton.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. and Kim, D. K. (2012). ‘Advanced method for the development of an empirical model to predict time-dependent corrosion wastage’. Corrosion Science, 63: 51–58.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Lee, J. M., Hwang, J. S. and Park, Y. I. (2003). ‘A time-dependent corrosion wastage model for the structures of single– and double–hull tankers and FSOs and FPSOs’. Marine Technology, 40(3): 201–217.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Lee, J. M., Hwang, J. S. and Park, Y. I. (2003a). ‘A time-dependent corrosion wastage model for the structures of single- and double-hull tankers and FSOs and FPSOs’. Marine Technology, 40(3): 201–217.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Lee, J. M. and Ko, M. J. (2003b). ‘Ultimate compressive strength of plate elements with pit corrosion wastage’. Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 217(M4): 185–200.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Lee, J. M. and Ko, M. J. (2004). ‘Ultimate shear strength of plate elements with pit corrosion wastage’. Thin–Walled Structures, 42(8): 1161–1176.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. and Melchers, R. E. (2008). Condition Assessment of Aged Structures. CRC Press, New York.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Thayamballi, A. K., Park, Y. I. and Hwang, J. S. (2004). ‘A time-dependent corrosion wastage model for seawater ballast tank structures of ships’. Corrosion Science, 46: 471–486.Google Scholar
Park, S. H., Shin, H. K., Kim, J. S., Cho, S. R., Jang, Y. S., Baek, N. K. and Park, D. K. (2020). ‘Experimental investigations on the residual strength of corroded steel-stiffened plates’. Proceedings of the 39thInternational Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, doi: 10.1115/OMAE2020-19122, 3–7 August (Online).Google Scholar
Perera, D. Y. (1995). ‘Stress phenomena in organic coatings’. Paint and Coating Testing Manual: Gardner–Sward Handbook, ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) International, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
Pirogov, V. D., Lyublinskii, E. Y., Samsonov, A. L., Shevchuk, P. R., Galapats, B. P. and Shevchuk, V. A. (1993). ‘Analytical method for calculating the life of ship paint coatings’. Protection of Metals, 29(2): 291–296.Google Scholar
Rajput, A., Ak, M., Kim, S. J., Noh, S. H., Park, J. H. and Paik, J. K. (2019). ‘Effects of the surface preparation on the life of epoxy coating in steel ship plates: An experimental study’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 14(S1): 199–206.Google Scholar
Rajput, A. and Paik, J. K. (2021). ‘Effects of naturally-progressed corrosion on the chemical and mechanical properties of structural steels’. Structures, 29: 2120–2138.Google Scholar
Rajput, A., Park, J. H., Noh, S. H. and Paik, J. K. (2020). ‘Fresh and sea water immersion corrosion testing on marine structural steel at low temperature’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 15(6): 661–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, R. E. (1997). Elements of Ocean Engineering. The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
Rolli, M. S. (1995). ‘A reliable method for predicting long-term coatings performance’. Corrosion Management, 4(1): 4–7.Google Scholar
Sakhnenko, N. D. (1997). ‘Imitation model form predicting the lifetime of paint coatings’. Protection of Metals, 33(4): 393–397.Google Scholar
Scully, J. R. and Hensley, S. T. (1994). ‘Lifetime prediction for organic coatings on steel and a magnesium alloy using electrochemical impedance methods’. Corrosion, 50(9): 705–716.Google Scholar
SRAJ (2002). Study on Cargo Oil Tank Corrosion of Oil Tanker. Report of Ship Research Panel 242, The Shipbuilding Research Association of Japan, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Staff, C. M. (1996). ‘Surface preparation: The key to coating performance on steel’. Corrosion Management, 5(1): 23–32.Google Scholar
Stambaugh, A. and Knecht, J. C. (1988). Corrosion Experience Data Requirements. Report No. SSC–348, Ship Structure Committee, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Tamburri, M. N., Little, B. J., Ruiz, G. M., Lee, J. S. and McNulty, P. D. (2003). ‘Evaluations of Venturi Oxygen Stripping™ as a ballast water treatment to prevent aquatic invasions and ship corrosion’. Proceedings of the 2nd International Ballast Water Treatment R&D Symposium, International Maritime Organization, London, 21–23 July.Google Scholar
Tamburri, M. N. and Ruiz, G. M. (2005). ‘Evaluation of a ballast water treatment to stop invasive species and tank corrosion’. Proceedings of the 2005 SNAME Annual Meeting, The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Houston, TX, 19–21 October.Google Scholar
TSCF (2002). ‘Guidelines for ballast tank coatings systems and surface preparation’. Tanker Structures Co-operative Forum, Witherby & Co., London.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, N. and Ikegami, K. (1998). ‘A study on the degradation of coating and corrosion of ship’s hull based on the probabilistic approach’. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 120: 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zekos, I. and Stack, M. M. (2019). ‘A note of a design protocol for deoxygenation of water’. Electrochemistry Communications, 103: 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Wu, J., Zhao, X., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y., Su, T. and Deng, H. (2020). ‘Life evaluation of organic coatings on hydraulic metal structures’. Progress in Organic Coatings, 148, doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105848.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×