Book contents
- Donor-Linked Families in the Digital Age
- Donor-Linked Families in the Digital Age
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Donor-Conceived Families
- Part I ‘DIY’ Donor Linking: Issues and Implications
- Part II Children’s and Adults’ Lived Experiences in Diverse Donor-Linked Families
- Chapter 6 The Importance of Donor Siblings to Teens and Young Adults
- Chapter 7 The Experiences of Donor-Conceived People Making Contact with Same-Donor Offspring through Fiom’s Group Meetings
- Chapter 8 ‘It’s All on Their Terms’
- Chapter 9 On Familial Haunting
- Chapter 10 Assisted Reproduction and Making Kin Connections between Māori and Pākehā in Aotearoa New Zealand
- Chapter 11 ‘Spunkles’, Donors, and Fathers
- Part III Institutionalised Resistance to Openness
- Index
- References
Chapter 6 - The Importance of Donor Siblings to Teens and Young Adults
Who Are We to One Another?
from Part II - Children’s and Adults’ Lived Experiences in Diverse Donor-Linked Families
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2023
Book contents
- Donor-Linked Families in the Digital Age
- Donor-Linked Families in the Digital Age
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Donor-Conceived Families
- Part I ‘DIY’ Donor Linking: Issues and Implications
- Part II Children’s and Adults’ Lived Experiences in Diverse Donor-Linked Families
- Chapter 6 The Importance of Donor Siblings to Teens and Young Adults
- Chapter 7 The Experiences of Donor-Conceived People Making Contact with Same-Donor Offspring through Fiom’s Group Meetings
- Chapter 8 ‘It’s All on Their Terms’
- Chapter 9 On Familial Haunting
- Chapter 10 Assisted Reproduction and Making Kin Connections between Māori and Pākehā in Aotearoa New Zealand
- Chapter 11 ‘Spunkles’, Donors, and Fathers
- Part III Institutionalised Resistance to Openness
- Index
- References
Summary
Children of the same donor and their families, with the help of the Internet, can now locate each other and have contact. This chapter explores the new forms of relatedness that have emerged with the growing availability and use of donor gametes. Specifically, I ask: how do donor-conceived youth situate their donor siblings in relation to other important relationships in their lives, such as friends and siblings who also live in their nuclear families? How do they actively construct these new relationships with newfound donor siblings and where do they fit within their families? Based upon in-depth interviews with teens and young adults who live in the United States, the varied understanding of these relationships is explored, including filling voids around identity, resemblances and the wish for “siblings”, the difficulties of forming new relationships and how heteronormative understandings of the bounded-nuclear family have sometimes become more fluid.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Donor-Linked Families in the Digital AgeRelatedness and Regulation, pp. 103 - 119Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Andreassen, R. (2017). New kinships, new family formations and negotiations of intimacy via social media sites. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1287683Google Scholar
Boyd, D. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cahn, N. R. (2013). The New Kinship: Constructing Donor-Conceived Families. NYU Press.Google Scholar
Davies, K. (2015). Siblings, stories and the self: the sociological significant of young people’s sibling relationships. Sociology, 49(4): 679–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, L., Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., & van den Akker, O. (2018). Searching for ‘relations’ using a DNA linking register by adults conceived following sperm donation. BioSocieties, 13(1), 170–189. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-017-0063-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, R. (2009). Turning strangers into kin: Half-siblings and anonymous donors. In Nelson, M.K. and Garey, A.I. (Eds.), Who’s Watching?: Daily Practices of Surveillance among Contemporary Families. Vanderbilt University Press, pp. 156–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv17vf76w.13Google Scholar
Hertz, R. & Mattes, J. (2011). Donor-shared siblings or genetic strangers: New families, clans and the internet. Journal of Family Issues, 32(9), 1129–1155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x11404345Google Scholar
Hertz, R., & Nelson, M. K. (2019). Random Families: Genetic Strangers, Sperm Donor Siblings, and the Creation of New Kin. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hertz, R, Nelson, M. K., & Kramer, W. (2017). Donor sibling networks as a vehicle for expanding kinship: a replication and extension. Journal of Family Issues, 38(2), 248–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x16631018Google Scholar
Indekeu, A., Bolt, S. H., & Maas, A. J. B. M. (2021). Meeting multiple donor half siblings: psychosocial challenges. Human Fertility, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.1872804Google Scholar
Jamieson, L. (2011), Intimacy as a concept: explaining social change in the context of globalization or another form of ethnocentricism? Sociological Research Online. 16(4), 151–163. Org.uk/16/4/15.html>10.5153/sro.2497Google Scholar
Mamo, L., & Alston-Stepnitz, E. (2015). Queer intimacies and structural inequalities: new directions in stratified reproduction. Journal of Family Issues, 36(4), 519–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x14563796Google Scholar
McKinnon, S. (2015). Productive paradoxes of the assisted reproductive technologies in the context of new kinship. Journal of Family Isses, 36(4), 461–479 https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14563799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordqvist, P. (2017). Genetic thinking and everyday living: on family practices and family imaginaries. The Sociological Review, 65(4): 865–881.Google Scholar
Powell, B. Blozendahl, C., Geist, C., & Steelman, L.C. (2010). Counted Out: Same-Sex Relationships and American’s Definitions of Family. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Scheib, J. E., McCormick, E., Benward, J., & Ruby, A. (2020). Finding people like me: contact among young adults who share an open-identity sperm donor. Human Reproduction Open, 2020(4) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa057Google Scholar
Stacey, J. (2011). Unhitched Love: Marriage, and Family Values from Western Hollywood to Western China. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. (1992). Reproducing the Future: Anthroplogy, Kinship and the Assisted Reproductive Technologies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weston, K. (1991), Families We Choose: Lesbian, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar