References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 July 2021
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Evolution of Social Behaviour , pp. 327 - 397Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Aanen, D.K. & Eggleton, P. 2005. Fungus-growing termites originated in African rain forest. Current Biology, 15, 851–855.Google Scholar
Aanen, D.K., Eggleton, P., Rouland-Lefèvre, C., et al. 2002. The evolution of fungus-growing termites and their mutualistic fungal symbionts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 99, 14887–14892.Google Scholar
Abbot, P., Withgott, J.H. & Moran, N.A. 2001. Genetic conflict and conditional altruism in social aphid colonies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 12068–12071.Google Scholar
Abbot, P., Abe, J., Alcock, J., et al. 2011. Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature, 471, E1–E4.Google Scholar
Abrahams, M.V. 1986. Patch choice under perceptual constraints: a cause for departures from an ideal free distribution. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 19, 409–415.Google Scholar
Adami, C. & Hintze, A. 2013. Evolutionary instability of zero-determinant strategies demonstrates that winning is not everything. Nature Communications, 4, 2193.Google Scholar
Afshar, M. & Giraldeau, L.A. 2014. A unified modelling approach for producer–scrounger games in complex ecological conditions. Animal Behaviour, 96, 167–176.Google Scholar
Akçay, E. & Van Cleve, J. 2016. There is no fitness but fitness, and the lineage is its bearer. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Science, 371, 20150085.Google Scholar
Alatalo, R.V., Gustafsson, L., Linden, M. & Lundberg, A. 1985. Interspecific competition and niche shifts in tits and the goldcrest: an experiment. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 54, 977–984.Google Scholar
Alatalo, R.V., Höglund, J., Lundberg, A. & Sutherland, W.J. 1992. Evolution of black grouse leks: female preferences benefit males in larger leks. Behavioral Ecology, 3, 53–59.Google Scholar
Alatalo, R.V., Höglund, J., Lundberg, A., Rintamäki, P.T. & Silverin, B. 1996. Testosterone and male mating success on the black grouse leks. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Science, 263, 1697–1702.Google Scholar
Alberts, J.R. 1978. Huddling by rat pups – group behavioral mechanisms of temperature regulation and energy-conservation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 92, 231–245.Google Scholar
Alberts, J.R. 2007. Huddling by rat pups: ontogeny of individual and group behavior. Developmental Psychobiology, 49, 22–32.Google Scholar
Alerstam, T., Nilsson, S.G. & Ulfstrand, S. 1974. Niche differentiation during winter in woodland birds in southern Sweden and the island of Gotland. Oikos, 321–330.Google Scholar
Alexander, R.D. 1974. The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 325–383.Google Scholar
Allen, B., Nowak, M.A. & Wilson, E.O. 2013. Limitations of inclusive fitness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 20135–20139.Google Scholar
Allison, S.T. & Kerr, N.L. 1994. Group correspondence biases and the provision of public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 688.Google Scholar
Almany, G.R., Hamilton, R.J., Bode, M., et al. 2013. Dispersal of grouper larvae drives local resource sharing in a coral reef fishery. Current Biology, 23, 626–630.Google Scholar
Alonzo, S.H. 2010. Social and coevolutionary feedbacks between mating and parental investment. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 99–108.Google Scholar
Alonzo, S.H. & Klug, H. 2012. Paternity, maternity, and parental care. In Royle, N.J., Smiseth, P.T. & Kölliker, M. (eds), The Evolution of Parental Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alonzo, S.H., Taborsky, M. & Wirtz, P. 2000. Male alternative reproductive behaviours in a Mediterranean wrasse, Symphodus ocellatus: evidence from otoliths for multiple life-history pathways. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2, 997–1007.Google Scholar
Alvard, M.S. & Nolin, D.A. 2002. Rousseau’s whale hunt? Coordination among big-game hunters. Current Anthropology, 43, 533–559.Google Scholar
Alvarez, H.P. 2004. Residence groups among hunter gatherers: a review of the claims and evidence for patrilocal bands. In Chapais, B. & Berman, C.M. (eds), Kinship and Behavior in Primates, pp. 420–442. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Amos, B., Barrett, J. & Dover, G.A. 1991. Breeding behaviour of pilot whales revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Heredity, 67, 49.Google Scholar
Anderholm, S., Waldeck, P., Van der Jeugd, H.P., et al. 2009. Colony kin structure and host–parasite relatedness in the barnacle goose. Molecular Ecology, 18, 4955–4963.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.G., Rhymer, J.M. & Rohwer, F.C. 1992. Philopatry, dispersal, and the genetic structure of waterfowl populations. In Batt, B.D.J., Afton, A.D., Anderson, M.G., et al. (eds), Ecology and Management of Breeding Waterfowl, pp. 365–395. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Andersson, M. 1984. Brood parasitism within species. In Barnard, C.J. (ed.), Producers and Scroungers: Strategies of Exploitation and Parasitism, pp. 195–228. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Andersson, M. 2005. Evolution of classical polyandry: three steps to female emancipation. Ethology, 111, 1–23.Google Scholar
Andersson, M. & Åhlund, M. 2000. Host–parasite relatedness shown by protein fingerprinting in a brood parasitic bird. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 13188–13193.Google Scholar
Andersson, M. & Simmons, L.W. 2006. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 296–302.Google Scholar
Andersson, M., Ahlund, M. & Waldeck, P. 2019. Brood parasitism, relatedness and sociality: a kinship role in female reproductive tactics. Biological Reviews, 94, 307–327.Google Scholar
Andre, J.B. 2015. Contingency in the evolutionary emergence of reciprocal cooperation. American Naturalist, 185, 303–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ang, T.Z. & Manica, A. 2010. Aggression, segregation and social stability in a dominance hierarchy. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 1337–1343.Google Scholar
Antolin, M.F. 1999. A genetic perspective on mating systems and sex ratios of parasitoid wasps. Researches on Population Ecology, 41, 29–37.Google Scholar
Aplin, L.M. & Morand-Ferron, J. 2017. Stable producer–scrounger dynamics in wild birds: sociability and learning speed covary with scrounging behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284, 20162872.Google Scholar
Archetti, M. & Scheuring, I. 2012. Game theory of public goods in one-shot social dilemmas without assortment. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 299, 9–20.Google Scholar
Arnold, C. & Taborsky, B. 2010. Social experience in early ontogeny has lasting effects on social skills in cooperatively breeding cichlids. Animal Behaviour, 79, 621–630.Google Scholar
Arnold, K.E. & Owens, I.P.F. 1998. Cooperative breeding in birds: a comparative test of the life history hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 265, 739–745.Google Scholar
Arnold, K.E. & Owens, I.P. 1999. Cooperative breeding in birds: the role of ecology. Behavioral Ecology, 10, 465–471.Google Scholar
Arnold, W. 1988. Social thermoregulation during hibernation in alpine marmots (Marmota marmota). Journal of Comparative Physiology B: Biochemical Systemic and Environmental Physiology, 158, 151–156.Google Scholar
Arnold, W. 1990a. The evolution of marmot sociality: I. Why disperse late? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 229–237.Google Scholar
Arnold, W. 1990b. The evolution of marmot sociality: II. Costs and benefits of joint hibernation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 239–246.Google Scholar
Arnott, G. & Elwood, R.W. 2009. Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Animal Behaviour, 77, 991–1004.Google Scholar
Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arseneau-Robar, T.J.M., Taucher, A.L., Muller, E., et al. 2016. Female monkeys use both the carrot and the stick to promote male participation in intergroup fights. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283, 20161817.Google Scholar
Ashton, B.J., Ridley, A.R., Edwards, E.K. & Thornton, A. 2018. Cognitive performance is linked to group size and affects fitness in Australian magpies. Nature, 554, 364.Google Scholar
Awata, S., Munehara, H. & Kohda, M. 2005. Social system and reproduction of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Julidochromis ornatus) in Lake Tanganyika: field observations and parentage analyses. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 58, 506–516.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. & Hamilton, W.D. 1981. The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390–1396.Google Scholar
Ågren, J. A. 2014. Evolutionary transitions in individuality: insights from transposable elements. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 90–96.Google Scholar
Ågren, J.A., Davies, N.G. & Foster, K.R. 2019. Enforcement is central to the evolution of cooperation. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3, 1018–1029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baba, R. 1990. Brood parasitism and egg robbing among three freshwater fish. Animal Behaviour, 40, 776–778.Google Scholar
Babcock, R.C., Bull, G.D., Harrison, P.L., et al. 1986. Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef. Marine Biology, 90, 379–394.Google Scholar
Babcock, R., Mundy, C., Keesing, J. & Oliver, J. 1992. Predictable and unpredictable spawning events – in-situ behavioral-data from free-spawning coral-reef invertebrates. Invertebrate Reproduction & Development, 22, 213–228.Google Scholar
Baglione, V., Canestrari, D., Marcos, J.M., Griesser, M. & Ekman, J. 2002. History, environment and social behaviour: experimentally induced cooperative breeding in the carrion crow. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1247–1251.Google Scholar
Baglione, V., Canestrari, D., Marcos, J.M. & Ekman, J. 2003. Kin selection in cooperative alliances of carrion crows. Science, 300, 1947–1949.Google Scholar
Baglione, V., Canestrari, D., Marcos, J.M. & Ekman, J. 2006. Experimentally increased food resources in the natal territory promote offspring philopatry and helping in cooperatively breeding carrion crows. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1529–1535.Google Scholar
Baird, T.A., Ryer, C.H. & Olla, B.L. 1991. Social enhancement of foraging on an ephemeral food source in juvenile walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 31, 307–311.Google Scholar
Baker, W.E. & Bulkley, N. 2014. Paying it forward vs. rewarding reputation: mechanisms of generalized reciprocity. Organization Science, 25, 1493–1510.Google Scholar
Balasubramaniam, K., Berman, C., Ogawa, H. & Li, J. 2011. Using biological markets principles to examine patterns of grooming exchange in Macaca thibetana. American Journal of Primatology, 73, 1269–1279.Google Scholar
Balcombe, J.P. 1989. Non-breeder asymmetry in Florida scrub jays. Evolutionary Ecology, 3, 77–79.Google Scholar
Baldan, D., Hinde, C.A. & Lessells, C.M. 2019. Turn-taking between provisioning parents: partitioning alternation. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 448. doi: 10. 3389/fevo.Google Scholar
Balmford, A. 1992. Social dispersion and lekking in Uganda kob. Behaviour, 120, 177–191.Google Scholar
Balmford, A., Deutsch, J.C., Nefdt, R.J.C. & Clutton-Brock, T. 1993. Testing hotspot models of lek evolution: data from three species of ungulates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 33, 57–65.Google Scholar
Balshine, S. 2012. Patterns of parental care in vertebrates. In Royle, N.J., Smiseth, P.T. & Kölliker, M. (eds), The Evolution of Parental Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Balshine, S., Leach, B., Neat, F., et al. 2001. Correlates of group size in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 134–140.Google Scholar
Balshine-Earn, S. & Lotem, A. 1998. Individual recognition in a cooperatively breeding cichlid: evidence from video playback experiments. Behaviour, 135, 369–386.Google Scholar
Balshine-Earn, S., Neat, F.C., Reid, H. & Taborsky, M. 1998. Paying to stay or paying to breed? Field evidence for direct benefits of helping behavior in a cooperatively breeding fish. Behavioral Ecology, 9, 432–438.Google Scholar
Balzarini, V., Taborsky, M., Wanner, S., Koch, F. & Frommen, J.G. 2014. Mirror, mirror on the wall: the predictive value of mirror tests for measuring aggression in fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 68, 871–878.Google Scholar
Balzarini, V., Taborsky, M., Villa, F. & Frommen, J.G. 2017. Computer animations of color markings reveal the function of visual threat signals in Neolamprologus pulcher. Current Zoology, 63, 45–54.Google Scholar
Bang, A. & Gadagkar, R. 2012. Reproductive queue without overt conflict in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 14494–14499.Google Scholar
Barak, Y. & Yomtov, Y. 1989. The advantage of group hunting in Kuhl’s bat Pipistrellus kuhli (Microchiroptera). Journal of Zoology, 219, 670–675.Google Scholar
Barelli, C., Reichard, U.H. & Mundry, R. 2011. Is grooming used as a commodity in wild white-handed gibbons, Hylobates lar? Animal Behaviour, 82, 801–809.Google Scholar
Barkan, C.P., Craig, J.L., Strahl, S.D., Stewart, A.M. & Brown, J.L. 1986. Social dominance in communal Mexican jays Aphelocoma ultramarina. Animal Behaviour, 34, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, J.L., Bronstein, J.L., Friesen, M.L., et al. 2017. Synthesizing perspectives on the evolution of cooperation within and between species. Evolution, 71, 814–825.Google Scholar
Barlow, G. 2008. The Cichlid Fishes: Nature’s Grand Experiment in Evolution. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Barlow, G.W. 1974. Contrasts in social behavior between Central American cichlid fishes and coral-reef surgeon fishes. American Zoologist, 14, 9–34.Google Scholar
Barlow, G.W. 1993. The puzzling paucity of feeding territories among freshwater fishes. Marine Behaviour & Physiology, 23, 155–174.Google Scholar
Barnard, C.J. (ed.). 1984. Producers and Scroungers: Strategies of Exploitation and Parasitism. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Barnard, C.J. & Sibly, R.M. 1981. Producers and scroungers: a general model and its application to captive flocks of house sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 29, 543–550.Google Scholar
Barnett, S.A. 1963. The Rat – A Study in Behavior. New Brunswick, NJ: AldineTransaction/Rutgers – The State University.Google Scholar
Barnett, S.A. & Spencer, M.M. 1951. Feeding, social behaviour and interspecific competition in wild rats. Behaviour, 3, 229–242.Google Scholar
Barrett, L., Henzi, S.P., Weingrill, T., Lycett, J.E. & Hill, R.A. 1999. Market forces predict grooming reciprocity in female baboons. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 266, 665–670.Google Scholar
Barrett, L., Gaynor, D. & Henzi, S.P. 2002. A dynamic interaction between aggression and grooming reciprocity among female chacma baboons. Animal Behaviour, 63, 1047–1053.Google Scholar
Barta, Z.N., Houston, A.I., McNamara, J.M. & Szekely, T. 2002. Sexual conflict about parental care: the role of reserves. American Naturalist, 159, 687–705.Google Scholar
Barta, Z., McNamara, J.M., Huszar, D.B. & Taborsky, M. 2011. Cooperation among non-relatives evolves by state-dependent generalized reciprocity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 843–848.Google Scholar
Barta, Z., Szekely, T., Liker, A. & Harrison, F. 2014. Social role specialization promotes cooperation between parents. American Naturalist, 183, 747–761.Google Scholar
Bartal, I.B., Rodgers, D.A., Sarria, M.S.B., Decety, J. & Mason, P. 2014. Pro-social behavior in rats is modulated by social experience. Elife, 3.Google Scholar
Bartlett, M.Y. & DeSteno, D. 2006. Gratitude and prosocial behavior. Psychological Science, 17, 319–325.Google Scholar
Basquill, S.P. & Grant, J.W. 1998. An increase in habitat complexity reduces aggression and monopolization of food by zebra fish (Danio rerio). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 76, 770–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, P. & Laland, K.N. 2013. Tinbergen’s four questions: an appreciation and an update. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 712–718.Google Scholar
Bateson, P., Gluckman, P. & Hanson, M. 2014. The biology of developmental plasticity and the Predictive Adaptive Response hypothesis. The Journal of Physiology, 592, 2357–2368.Google Scholar
Batra, L.R. & Michie, M.D. 1963. Pleomorphism in some ambrosia and related fungi. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science (1903–), 66, 470–481.Google Scholar
Bayani, D.M., Taborsky, M. & Frommen, J.G. 2017. To pee or not to pee: urine signals mediate aggressive interactions in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71, 37.Google Scholar
Bean, D. & Cook, J.M. 2001. Male mating tactics and lethal combat in the nonpollinating fig wasp Sycoscapter australis. Animal Behaviour, 62, 535–542.Google Scholar
Beani, L. & Turillazzi, S. 1988. Alternative mating tactics in males of Polistes dominulus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 22, 257–264.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, G. 2012. Foraging speed in staging flocks of semipalmated sandpipers: evidence for scramble competition. Oecologia, 169, 975–980.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, G. & Fernández-Juricic, E. 2004. The group-size paradox: effects of learning and patch departure rules. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 352–357.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, G. & Giraldeau, L.A. 1997. Patch exploitation in a producer–scrounger system: test of a hypothesis using flocks of spice finches (Lonchura punctulata). Behavioral Ecology, 8, 54–59.Google Scholar
Beauplet, G., Barbraud, C., Dabin, W., Küssener, C. & Guinet, C. 2006. Age-specific survival and reproductive performances in fur seals: evidence of senescence and individual quality. Oikos, 112, 430–441.Google Scholar
Bebbington, K. & Hatchwell, B.J. 2016. Coordinated parental provisioning is related to feeding rate and reproductive success in a songbird. Behavioral Ecology, 27, 652–659.Google Scholar
Bebbington, K., Kingma, S.A., Fairfield, E.A., et al. 2017. Kinship and familiarity mitigate costs of social conflict between Seychelles warbler neighbors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, E9036–E9045.Google Scholar
Beck, N.R., Peakall, R. & Heinsohn, R. 2008. Social constraint and an absence of sex-biased dispersal drive fine-scale genetic structure in white-winged choughs. Molecular Ecology, 17, 4346–4358.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S. 1968. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.Google Scholar
Beckerman, A.P., Sharp, S.P. & Hatchwell, B.J. 2011. Predation and kin-structured populations: an empirical perspective on the evolution of cooperation. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 1294–1303.Google Scholar
Bednarz, J.C. 1988. Cooperative hunting in Harris hawks (Parabuteo unicinctus). Science, 239, 1525–1527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bednekoff, P.A. 1997. Mutualism among safe, selfish sentinels: a dynamic game. American Naturalist, 150, 373–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bednekoff, P.A. & Naguib, M. 2015. Sentinel behavior: a review and prospectus. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 47, 115–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beekman, M. & Oldroyd, B.P. 2008. When workers disunite: intraspecific parasitism by eusocial bees. Annual Review of Entomology, 53, 19–37.Google Scholar
Begon, M., Townsend, C.R. & Harper, J.L. 2006. Ecology: From Individuals to Ecosystems (4th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Bell, G. & Collins, S. 2008. Adaptation, extinction and global change. Evolutionary Applications, 1(1), 3–16.Google Scholar
Bell, M.B.V., Nichols, H.J., Gilchrist, J.S., Cant, M.A. & Hodge, S.J. 2012. The cost of dominance: suppressing subordinate reproduction affects the reproductive success of dominant female banded mongooses. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 279, 619–624.Google Scholar
Bender, N., Heg, D., Hamilton, I.M., et al. 2006. The relationship between social status, behaviour, growth and steroids in male helpers and breeders of a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Hormones and Behavior, 50, 173–182.Google Scholar
Bentley, M.G., Olive, P.J.W. & Last, K. 2001. Sexual satellites, moonlight and the nuptial dances of worms: The influence of the Moon on the reproduction of marine animals. Earth, Moon and Planets, 85, 67–84.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, B.O. 1978. Avoiding inbreeding: at what cost? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 73, 439–444.Google Scholar
Benoit-Bird, K.J. & Au, W.W. 2009. Cooperative prey herding by the pelagic dolphin, Stenella longirostris. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 125–137.Google Scholar
Benson-Amram, S., Dantzer, B., Stricker, G., Swanson, E.M. & Holekamp, K.E. 2016. Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 2532–2537.Google Scholar
Benton, T.G. & Foster, W.A. 1992. Altruistic housekeeping in a social aphid. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 247, 199–202.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, F.B. 1988. Coalitions, cooperation and reproductive tactics among adult male baboons. Animal Behaviour, 36, 1198–1209.Google Scholar
Berec, M. & Bajgar, A. 2011. Choosy outsiders? Satellite males associate with sexy hosts in the European tree frog Hyla arborea. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 57, 247–254.Google Scholar
Berg, E.C. 2005. Parentage and reproductive success in the white-throated magpie-jay, Calocitta formosa, a cooperative breeder with female helpers. Animal Behaviour, 70, 375–385.Google Scholar
Berg, E.C., Eadie, J.M., Langen, T.A. & Russell, A.F. 2009. Reverse sex-biased philopatry in a cooperative bird: genetic consequences and a social cause. Molecular Ecology, 18, 3486–3499.Google Scholar
Berger-Tal, R., Lubin, Y., Settepani, V., et al. 2015. Evidence for loss of nepotism in the evolution of permanent sociality. Scientific Reports, 5, 13284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berghänel, A., Ostner, J., Schröder, U. & Schülke, O. 2011. Social bonds predict future cooperation in male Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus. Animal Behaviour, 81, 1109–1116.Google Scholar
Bergmüller, R. & Taborsky, M. 2005. Experimental manipulation of helping in a cooperative breeder: helpers ‘pay to stay’ by pre-emptive appeasement. Animal Behaviour, 69, 19–28.Google Scholar
Bergmüller, R. & Taborsky, M. 2007. Adaptive behavioural syndromes due to strategic niche specialization. BMC Ecology, 7, 12.Google Scholar
Bergmüller, R. & Taborsky, M. 2010. Animal personality due to social niche specialisation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 504–511.Google Scholar
Bergmüller, R., Heg, D. & Taborsky, M. 2005a. Helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid stay and pay or disperse and breed, depending on ecological constraints. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, 325–331.Google Scholar
Bergmüller, R., Heg, D., Peer, K. & Taborsky, M. 2005b. Extended safe havens and between-group dispersal of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Behaviour, 142, 1643–1667.Google Scholar
Bergmüller, R., Johnstone, R.A., Russell, A.F. & Bshary, R. 2007. Integrating cooperative breeding into theoretical concepts of cooperation. Behavioural Processes, 76, 61–72.Google Scholar
Bergmüller, R., Schurch, R. & Hamilton, I.M. 2010. Evolutionary causes and consequences of individual variation in cooperative behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2751–2764.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, G. & Strassmann, J.E. 1999. Cooperation among unrelated individuals: the ant foundress case. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 477–482.Google Scholar
Bernheim, B.D. & Thomadsen, R. 2005. Memory and anticipation. The Economic Journal, 115, 271–304.Google Scholar
Bénabou, R. & Tirole, J. 2009. Over my dead body: bargaining and the price of dignity. The American Economic Review, 99, 459–465.Google Scholar
Bhadra, A. & Gadagkar, R. 2008. We know that the wasps ‘know’: cryptic successors to the queen in Ropalidia marginata. Biology Letters, 4, 634–637.Google Scholar
Bhadra, A., Mitra, A., Deshpande, S.A., et al. 2010. Regulation of reproduction in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata: on the trail of the queen pheromone. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 36, 424–431.Google Scholar
Biedermann, P.H.W. 2010. Observations on sex ratio and behavior of males in Xyleborinus saxesenii Ratzeburg (Scolytinae, Coleoptera). Zookeys, 56, 253–267.Google Scholar
Biedermann, P.H.W. & Taborsky, M. 2011. Larval helpers and age polyethism in ambrosia beetles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 17064–17069.Google Scholar
Biedermann, P.H.W. & Taborsky, M. 2021. Experimental social evolution of philopatry and cooperation in fungus-farming beetles. Unpublished data.Google Scholar
Biedermann, P.H.W., Klepzig, K.D. & Taborsky, M. 2009. Fungus cultivation by ambrosia beetles: behavior and laboratory breeding success in three xyleborine species. Environmental Entomology, 38, 1096–1105.Google Scholar
Biedermann, P.H.W., Klepzig, K.D. & Taborsky, M. 2011. Costs of delayed dispersal and alloparental care in the fungus-cultivating ambrosia beetle Xyleborus affinis Eichhoff (Scolytinae: Curculionidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 1753–1761.Google Scholar
Biedermann, P.H.W., Peer, K. & Taborsky, M. 2012. Female dispersal and reproduction in the ambrosia beetle Xyleborinus saxesenii Ratzeburg (Coleoptera; Scolytinae). Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Allgemeine und Angewandte Entomologie, 18, 231–235.Google Scholar
Biedermann, P.H.W., Klepzig, K.D., Taborsky, M. & Six, D.L. 2013. Abundance and dynamics of filamentous fungi in the complex ambrosia gardens of the primitively eusocial beetle Xyleborinus saxesenii Ratzeburg (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae). FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 83, 711–723.Google Scholar
Bignell, D.E., Roisin, Y. & Lo, N. 2011. Biology of Termites: A Modern Synthesis. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Bijleveld, A.I., van Gils, J.A., Jouta, J. & Piersma, T. 2015. Benefits of foraging in small groups: an experimental study on public information use in red knots Calidris canutus. Behavioural Processes, 117, 74–81.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. 2010. Bargaining in biology? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23, 1351–1363.Google Scholar
Bird, R.B., Scelza, B., Bird, D.W. & Smith, E.A. 2012. The hierarchy of virtue: mutualism, altruism and signaling in Martu women’s cooperative hunting. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 64–78.Google Scholar
Birkhead, T.R. 1998. Cryptic female choice: criteria for establishing female sperm choice. Evolution, 52, 1212–1218.Google Scholar
Bischoff, L.L. 2004. The social structure of the haplodiploid bark beetle, Xylosandrus germanus. Diploma thesis, University of Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Bissonnette, A., Franz, M., Schulke, O. & Ostner, J. 2014. Socioecology, but not cognition, predicts male coalitions across primates. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 794–801.Google Scholar
Black, J.M. & Owen, M. 1989. Parent–offspring relationships in wintering barnacle geese. Animal Behaviour, 37, 187–198.Google Scholar
Blanchard, D.C., Fukunagastinson, C., Takahashi, L.K., Flannelly, K.J. & Blanchard, R.J. 1984. Dominance and aggression in social groups of male and female rats. Behavioural Processes, 9, 31–48.Google Scholar
Blanckenhorn, W.U. & Caraco, T. 1992. Social subordinance and a resource queue. The American Naturalist, 139, 442–449.Google Scholar
Blanckenhorn, W.U., Morf, C. & Reuter, M. 2000. Are dung flies ideal-free distributed at their oviposition and mating site? Behaviour, 137, 233–248.Google Scholar
Blaustein, A.R., Bekoff, M. & Daniels, T.J. 1987. Kin recognition in vertebrates (excluding primates): empirical evidence. In Fletcher, D.J.C. & Michener, C.D. (eds), Kin Recognition in Animals, pp. 287–331. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Blažek, R., Polačik, M., Smith, C., et al. 2018. Success of cuckoo catfish brood parasitism reflects coevolutionary history and individual experience of their cichlid hosts. Science Advances, 4, eaar4380.Google Scholar
Bleay, C., Comendant, T. & Sinervo, B. 2007. An experimental test of frequency-dependent selection on male mating strategy in the field. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 2019–2025.Google Scholar
Blumstein, D.T., Ebensperger, L.A., Hayes, L.D., et al. 2010. Toward an integrative understanding of social behavior: new models and new opportunities. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 34.Google Scholar
Blurton Jones, N.G. 1984. A selfish origin for human food sharing – tolerated theft. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5, 1–3.Google Scholar
Blurton Jones, N.G. 1987. Tolerated theft, suggestions about the ecology and evolution of sharing, hoarding and scrounging. Social Science Information Sur les Sciences Sociales, 26, 31–54.Google Scholar
Boehm, C. 1999. Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boesch, C. 1994. Cooperative hunting in wild chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 48, 653–667.Google Scholar
Boesch, C. 2002. Cooperative hunting roles among Tai chimpanzees. Human Nature – An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective, 13, 27–46.Google Scholar
Boesch, C. & Boesch, H. 1989. Hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees in the Tai National Park. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 78, 547–573.Google Scholar
Boesch, C., Crockford, C., Herbinger, I., et al. 2008. Intergroup conflicts among chimpanzees in Tai National Park: lethal violence and the female perspective. American Journal of Primatology: Official Journal of the American Society of Primatologists, 70, 519–532.Google Scholar
Bogliani, G.I.U.S., Sergio, F.A.B.R. & Tavecchia, G.I.A.C. 1999. Woodpigeons nesting in association with hobby falcons: advantages and choice rules. Animal Behaviour, 57, 125–131.Google Scholar
Boland, C.R. 2003. An experimental test of predator detection rates using groups of free-living emus. Ethology, 109, 209–222.Google Scholar
Bonduriansky, R. & Chenoweth, S.F. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 280–288.Google Scholar
Bonneaud, C., Pérez-Tris, J., Federici, P., Chastel, O. & Sorci, G. 2006. Major histocompatibility alleles associated with local resistance to malaria in a passerine. Evolution, 60, 383–389.Google Scholar
Bonner, J.T. 1998. The origins of multicellularity. Integrative Biology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 1, 27–36.Google Scholar
Boomsma, J.J. 2007. Kin selection versus sexual selection: why the ends do not meet. Current Biology, 17, R673–R683.Google Scholar
Boomsma, J.J. 2009. Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3191–3207.Google Scholar
Boomsma, J.J. 2013. Beyond promiscuity: mate-choice commitments in social breeding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368.Google Scholar
Borgeaud, C. & Bshary, R. 2015. Wild vervet monkeys trade tolerance and specific coalitionary support for grooming in experimentally induced conflicts. Current Biology, 25, 3011–3016.Google Scholar
Bornbusch, S.L., Lefcheck, J.S. & Duffy, J.E. 2018. Allometry of individual reproduction and defense in eusocial colonies: a comparative approach to trade-offs in social sponge dwelling Synalpheus shrimps. PLoS One, 13.Google Scholar
Bos, D., van de Koppel, J. & Weissing, F.J. 2004. Dark-bellied Brent geese aggregate to cope with increased levels of primary production. Oikos, 107, 485–496.Google Scholar
Böttcher, M.A. & Nagler, J. 2016. Promotion of cooperation by selective group extinction. New Journal of Physics, 18.Google Scholar
Bouchard, F. & Huneman, P. 2013. From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boucher, D.H. 1985. The Biology of Mutualism: Ecology and Evolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourke, A.F. 2005. Genetics, relatedness and social behaviour in insect societies. In Fellowes, M., Holloway, G. & Rolff, J. (eds), Insect Evolutionary Ecology. Wallingford: CABI.Google Scholar
Bourke, A.F.G. 1999. Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 245–257.Google Scholar
Bourke, A.F.G. 2009. The kin structure of sexual interactions. Biology Letters, 5, 689–692.Google Scholar
Bourke, A.F.G. 2014. Hamilton’s rule and the causes of social evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130362.Google Scholar
Bourke, A.F., Franks, N.R. & Franks, N.R. 1995. Social Evolution in Ants. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. 2009. Did warfare among ancestral hunter-gatherers affect the evolution of human social behaviors? Science, 324, 1293–1298.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. 2013. A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Box, G.E. & Draper, N.R. 1987. Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P.J. 1988. The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 132, 337–356.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P.J. 1989. The evolution of indirect reciprocity. Social Networks, 11, 213–236.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P.J. 1992. Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 171–195.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S. & Richerson, P.J. 2003. The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 3531–3535.Google Scholar
Boydston, E.E., Morelli, T.L. & Holekamp, K.E. 2001. Sex differences in territorial behavior exhibited by the spotted hyena (Hyaenidae, Crocuta crocuta). Ethology, 107, 369–385.Google Scholar
Bradley, B.J., Doran-Sheehy, D.M. & Vigilant, L. 2007. Potential for female kin associations in wild western gorillas despite female dispersal. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 2179–2185.Google Scholar
Brahma, A., Mandal, S. & Gadagkar, R. 2018. Emergence of cooperation and division of labor in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 756–761.Google Scholar
Brahma, A., Mandal, S. & Gadagkar, R. 2019. To leave or to stay: direct fitness through natural nest foundation in a primitively eusocial wasp. Insectes Sociaux, 66, 335–342.Google Scholar
Branconi, R., Baracchi, D., Turillazzi, S. & Cervo, R. 2018. Testing the signal value of clypeal black patterning in an Italian population of the paper wasp Polistes dominula. Insectes Sociaux, 65, 161–169.Google Scholar
Brandl, S. & Bellwood, D. 2015. You watch my back and I’ll watch yours: coordinated vigilance and reciprocal cooperation in coral reef rabbitfishes. Scientific Reports, 5, 14556.Google Scholar
Brandt, H., Ohtsuki, H., Iwasa, Y. & Sigmund, K. 2007. Survey of indirect reciprocity. In Takeuchi, Y., Iwasa, Y. & Sato, K. (eds), Mathematics for Ecology and Environmental Sciences, pp. 21–49. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Brandt, M., Foitzik, S., Fischer-Blass, B. & Heinze, J. 2005. The coevolutionary dynamics of obligate ant social parasite system – between prudence and antagonism. Biological Reviews, 80, 251–267.Google Scholar
Breder, C.M. & Rosen, D.E. 1966. Modes of Reproduction in Fishes. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Brent, L.J., Franks, D.W., Foster, E.A., et al. 2015. Ecological knowledge, leadership, and the evolution of menopause in killer whales. Current Biology, 25, 746–750.Google Scholar
Bridge, C. & Field, J. 2007. Queuing for dominance: gerontocracy and queue-jumping in the hover wasp Liostenogaster flavolineata. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 1253–1259.Google Scholar
Briffa, M. & Elwood, R.W. 2009. Difficulties remain in distinguishing between mutual and self-assessment in animal contests. Animal Behaviour, 77, 759–762.Google Scholar
Briffa, M. & Fortescue, K.J. 2017. Motor pattern during fights in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus: evidence for the role of skill in animal contests. Animal Behaviour, 128, 13–20.Google Scholar
Briffa, M. & Hardy, I.C. 2013. Introduction to animal contests. In Hardy, I.C.W. & Briffa, M. (eds), Animal Contests, pp. 1–4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Briffa, M. & Sneddon, L.U. 2007. Physiological constraints on contest behaviour. Functional Ecology, 21, 627–637.Google Scholar
Briffa, M., Hardy, I.C., Gammell, M.P., et al. 2013. Analysis of animal contest data. In Hardy, I.C.W. & Briffa, M. (eds), Animal Contests, pp. 47–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bright, M. & Bulgheresi, S. 2010. A complex journey: transmission of microbial symbionts. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 8, 218.Google Scholar
Brockmann, H.J. 2001. The evolution of alternative strategies and tactics. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 30, 1–51.Google Scholar
Brockmann, H.J. & Taborsky, M. 2008. Alternative reproductive tactics and the evolution of alternative allocation phenotypes. In Oliveira, R.F., Taborsky, M. & Brockmann, H.J. (eds), Alternative Reproductive Tactics, pp. 25–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bro-Jørgensen, J. 2003. The significance of hotspots to lekking topi antelopes (Damaliscus lunatus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 53, 324–331.Google Scholar
Bronstein, J.L. 1994a. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9, 214–217.Google Scholar
Bronstein, J.L. 1994b. Our current understanding of mutualism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 69, 31–51.Google Scholar
Bronstein, J.L., Alarcon, R. & Geber, M. 2006. The evolution of plant–insect mutualisms. New Phytologist, 172, 412–428.Google Scholar
Brooker, M.G., Rowley, I., Adams, M. & Baverstock, P.R. 1990. Promiscuity: an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in a socially monogamous species? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26, 191–199.Google Scholar
Broom, M., Johanis, M. & Rychtá, J. 2015. The effect of fight cost structure on fighting behaviour. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 71, 979–996.Google Scholar
Brosnan, S.F., Salwiczek, L. & Bshary, R. 2010. The interplay of cognition and cooperation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2699–2710.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L., Heg, D. & Taborsky, M. 2005. Experimental evidence for helper effects in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 667–673.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L., Richardson, D.S., Eikenaar, C. & Komdeur, J. 2006. The role of group size and environmental factors on survival in a cooperatively breeding tropical passerine. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 1321–1329.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L., Tinbergen, J.M., Both, C., et al. 2009. Experimental evidence for density-dependent reproduction in a cooperatively breeding passerine. Ecology, 90, 729–741.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L., Van De Pol, M., Atema, E.L.S. & Cockburn, A. 2011. Strategic promiscuity helps avoid inbreeding at multiple levels in a cooperative breeder where both sexes are philopatric. Molecular Ecology, 20, 4796–4807.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L., Richardson, D.S. & Komdeur, J. 2012. Helpers at the nest improve late-life offspring performance: evidence from a long-term study and a cross-foster experiment. Plos One, 7, e33167.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L., van de Pol, M. & Cockburn, A. 2014. The role of social environment on parental care: offspring benefit more from the presence of female than male helpers. Journal of Animal Ecology, 83, 491–503.Google Scholar
Brown, C., Garwood, M.P. & Williamson, J.E. 2012. It pays to cheat: tactical deception in a cephalopod social signalling system. Biology Letters, 8, 729–732.Google Scholar
Brown, C.R., Brown, M.B. & Shaffer, M.L. 1991. Food-sharing signals among socially foraging cliff swallows. Animal Behaviour, 42, 551–564.Google Scholar
Brown, J.L. 1964. The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. The Wilson Bulletin, 76, 160–169.Google Scholar
Brown, J.L. 1980. Fitness in complex avian social systems. In Markl, H. (ed.), Evolution of Social Behavior: Hypotheses and Empirical Tests, pp. 115–128. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie.Google Scholar
Brown, J.L. 1983. Cooperation – a biologists dilemma. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 13, 1–37.Google Scholar
Brown, J.L. 1987. Helping and Communal Breeding in Birds: Ecology and Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J.L. & Brown, E.R. 1980. Reciprocal aid-giving in a communal bird. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie – Journal of Comparative Ethology, 53, 313–324.Google Scholar
Brown, J.L. & Brown, E.R. 1984. Parental facilitation: parent–offspring relations in communally breeding birds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 14, 203–209.Google Scholar
Brown, J.L. & Brown, E.R. 1990. Mexican jays: uncooperative breeding. In Stacey, P.B. & Koenig, W.D. (eds), Cooperative Breeding in Birds, pp. 267–288. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J.L. & Orians, G.H. 1970. Spacing patterns in mobile animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 239–262.Google Scholar
Brown, W.L. & Wilson, E.O. 1956. Character displacement. Systematic Zoology, 5, 49–64.Google Scholar
Browne, F.G. 1961. The biology of Malayan Scolytidae and Platypodidae. Malayan Forest Records, 22, 1–255.Google Scholar
Browne, F.G. 1965. Types of ambrosia beetle attack on living trees. Proceedings of the International Congress of Entomology, 12, 680.Google Scholar
Brucks, D. & von Bayern, A.M.P. 2020. Parrots voluntarily help each other to obtain food rewards. Current Biology, 30, 292–297.Google Scholar
Bruintjes, R. & Taborsky, M. 2008. Helpers in a cooperative breeder pay a high price to stay: effects of demand, helper size and sex. Animal Behaviour, 75, 1843–1850.Google Scholar
Bruintjes, R. & Taborsky, M. 2011. Size-dependent task specialization in a cooperative cichlid in response to experimental variation of demand. Animal Behaviour, 81, 387–394.Google Scholar
Bruintjes, R., Hekman, R. & Taborsky, M. 2010. Experimental global food reduction raises resource acquisition costs of brood care helpers and reduces their helping effort. Functional Ecology, 24, 1054–1063.Google Scholar
Bruintjes, R., Bonfils, D., Heg, D. & Taborsky, M. 2011. Paternity of subordinates raises cooperative effort in cichlids. PLoS One, 6, e25673.Google Scholar
Bruintjes, R., Heg-Bachar, Z. & Heg, D. 2013. Subordinate removal affects parental investment, but not offspring survival in a cooperative cichlid. Functional Ecology, 27, 730–738.Google Scholar
Bruintjes, R., Lynton-Jenkins, J., Jones, J.W., et al. 2016. Out-group threat promotes within-group affiliation in a cooperative fish. The American Naturalist, 187, 274–282.Google Scholar
Brunner, E. & Heinze, J. 2009. Worker dominance and policing in the ant Temnothorax unifasciatus. Insectes Sociaux, 56, 397–404.Google Scholar
Bshary, R. 2002. Biting cleaner fish use altruism to deceive image-scoring client reef fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269, 2087–2093.Google Scholar
Bshary, R. & Bergmüller, R. 2008. Distinguishing four fundamental approaches to the evolution of helping. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 405–420.Google Scholar
Bshary, R. & Grutter, A.S. 2002. Asymmetric cheating opportunities and partner control in a cleaner fish mutualism. Animal Behaviour, 63, 547–555.Google Scholar
Bshary, R. & Grutter, A.S. 2005. Punishment and partner switching cause cooperative behaviour in a cleaning mutualism. Biology Letters, 1, 396–399.Google Scholar
Bshary, R. & Grutter, A.S. 2006. Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism. Nature, 441, 975–978.Google Scholar
Bshary, R. & Schäffer, D. 2002. Choosy reef fish select cleaner fish that provide high-quality service. Animal Behaviour, 63, 557–564.Google Scholar
Bshary, R., Hohner, A., Ait-el-Djoudi, K. & Fricke, H. 2006. Interspecific communicative and coordinated hunting between groupers and giant moray eels in the Red Sea. PLoS Biology, 4, e431.Google Scholar
Bshary, R., Zuberbuhler, K. & van Schaik, C.P. 2016. Why mutual helping in most natural systems is neither conflict-free nor based on maximal conflict. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150091.Google Scholar
Buckley, N.J. 1996. Food finding and the influence of information, local enhancement, and communal roosting on foraging success of North American vultures. The Auk, 113, 473–488.Google Scholar
Buckley, N.J. 1997. Experimental tests of the information-center hypothesis with black vultures (Coragypsatratus) and turkey vultures (Cathartesaura). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 267–279.Google Scholar
Bugnyar, T. & Kotrschal, K. 2002. Observational learning and the raiding of food caches in ravens, Corvus corax: is it ‘tactical’deception? Animal Behaviour, 64, 185–195.Google Scholar
Bugnyar, T. & Kotrschal, K. 2004. Leading a conspecific away from food in ravens (Corvus corax)? Animal Cognition, 7, 69–76.Google Scholar
Burgerhout, E., Tudorache, C., Brittijn, S.A., et al. 2013. Schooling reduces energy consumption in swimming male European eels, Anguilla anguilla L. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 448, 66–71.Google Scholar
Burke, T., Davies, N.B., Bruford, M.W. & Hatchwell, B.J. 1989. Parental care and mating behaviour of polyandrous dunnocks Prunella modularis related to paternity by DNA fingerprinting. Nature, 338, 249–251.Google Scholar
Burnet, F.M. 1970. The concept of immunological surveillance. Immunological Aspects of Neoplasia, 13, 1–27.Google Scholar
Burnovski, M. & Safra, Z. 1994. Deterrence effects of sequential punishment policies: should repeat offenders be more severely punished? International Review of Law and Economics, 14, 341–350.Google Scholar
Burt, A. & Trivers, R. 2006. Genes in Conflict: the Biology of Selfish Genetic Elements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, D.B. & Peterson, A.T. 1993. Biology of cooperative-breeding scrub jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) of Oaxaca, Mexico. The Auk, 110, 207–214.Google Scholar
Buss, L.W. 1987. The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Buston, P. 2003a. Forcible eviction and prevention of recruitment in the clown anemonefish. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 576–582.Google Scholar
Buston, P. 2003b. Social hierarchies: size and growth modification in clownfish. Nature, 424, 145–146.Google Scholar
Buston, P.M. & Cant, M.A. 2006. A new perspective on size hierarchies in nature: patterns, causes, and consequences. Oecologia, 149, 362–372.Google Scholar
Buston, P.M., Fauvelot, C., Wong, M.Y. & Planes, S. 2009. Genetic relatedness in groups of the humbug damselfish Dascyllus aruanus: small, similar-sized individuals may be close kin. Molecular Ecology, 18, 4707–4715.Google Scholar
Buzatto, B.A., Tomkins, J.L. & Simmons, L.W. 2014. Alternative phenotypes within mating systems. In Shuker, D. & Simmons, L. (eds), The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, pp. 106–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cade, W.H. & Cade, S. 1992. Male mating success, calling and searching behaviour at high and low densities in the field cricket, Gryllus integer. Animal Behaviour, 43, 49–56.Google Scholar
Caine, N.G., Addington, R.L. & Windfelder, T.L. 1995. Factors affecting the rates of food calls given by red-bellied tamarins. Animal Behaviour, 50, 53–60.Google Scholar
Cam, E., Link, W.A., Cooch, E.G., Monnat, J.Y. & Danchin, E. 2002. Individual covariation in life-history traits: seeing the trees despite the forest. The American Naturalist, 159, 96–105.Google Scholar
Cam, E., Monnat, J. & Royle, A. 2004. Dispersal and individual quality in a long lived species. Oikos, 106, 386–398.Google Scholar
Campbell, L.A., Tkaczynski, P.J., Lehmann, J., Mouna, M. & Majolo, B. 2018. Social thermoregulation as a potential mechanism linking sociality and fitness: Barbary macaques with more social partners form larger huddles. Scientific Reports, 8, 6074.Google Scholar
Campenni, M., Manciocco, A., Vitale, A. & Schino, G. 2015. Exchanging grooming, but not tolerance and aggression in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). American Journal of Primatology, 77, 222–228.Google Scholar
Canestrari, D., Marcos, J.M. & Baglione, V. 2005. Effect of parentage and relatedness on the individual contribution to cooperative chick care in carrion crows Corvus corone corone. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57, 422–428.Google Scholar
Canestrari, D., Marcos, J.M. & Baglione, V. 2011. Helpers at the nest compensate for reduced maternal investment in egg size in carrion crows. Journal of Evolutionay Biology, 24, 1870–1878.Google Scholar
Caniglia, G. 2015. Understanding societies from inside the organisms. Leo Pardi’s work on social dominance in Polistes wasps (1937–1952). Journal of the History of Biology, 48, 455–486.Google Scholar
Canonge, S., Deneubourg, J.L. & Sempo, G. 2011. Group living enhances individual resources discrimination: the use of public information by cockroaches to assess shelter quality. PLoS One, 6.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A. 1998. A model for the evolution of reproductive skew without reproductive suppression. Animal Behaviour, 55, 163–169.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A. 2000. Social control of reproduction in banded mongooses. Animal Behaviour, 59, 147–158.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A. 2003. Patterns of helping effort in cooperatively breeding banded mongooses (Mungos mungo). Journal of Zoology, 259, 115–121.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A. 2006. A tale of two theories: parent–offspring conflict and reproductive skew. Animal Behaviour, 71, 255–263.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A. 2011. The role of threats in animal cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 170–178.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A. 2012. Suppression of social conflict and evolutionary transitions to cooperation. American Naturalist, 179, 293–301.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A. & Croft, D.P. 2019. Life-history evolution: grandmothering in space and time. Current Biology, 29 (6), R215–R218.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A. & Field, J. 2001. Helping effort and future fitness in cooperative animal societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268, 1959–1964.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A. & Johnstone, R.A. 1999. Costly young and reproductive skew in animal societies. Behavioral Ecology, 10, 178–184.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A. & Johnstone, R.A. 2006. Self-serving punishment and the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19, 1383–1385.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A. & Johnstone, R.A. 2008. Reproductive conflict and the separation of reproductive generations in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 5332–5336.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A. & Johnstone, R.A. 2009. How threats influence the evolutionary resolution of within-group conflict. American Naturalist, 173, 759–771.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A. & Reeve, H.K. 2002. Female control of the distribution of paternity in cooperative breeders. American Naturalist, 160, 602–611.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A. & Shen, S.F. 2006. Endogenous timing in competitive interactions among relatives. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273, 171–178.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A. & Young, A.J. 2013. Resolving social conflict among females without overt aggression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 368, 20130076.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A., English, S., Reeve, H.K. & Field, J. 2006a. Escalated conflict in a social hierachy. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1471–2954.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A., Llop, J.B. & Field, J. 2006b. Individual variation in social aggression and the probability of inheritance: theory and a field test. American Naturalist, 167, 837–852.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A., Hodge, S.J., Gilchrist, J.S., Bell, M.B.V. & Nichols, H.J. 2010. Reproductive control via eviction (but not the threat of eviction) in banded mongooses. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2219–2226.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A., Vitikainen, E. & Nichols, H.J. 2013. Demography and social evolution of banded mongooses. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 45, 407–445.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A., Nichols, H.J., Johnstone, R.A. & Hodge, S.J. 2014. Policing of reproduction by hidden threats in a cooperative mammal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 326–330.Google Scholar
Cant, M.A., Nichols, H.J., Thompson, F.J. & Vitikainen, E.I. 2016. Banded mongooses: demography, life history, and social behavior. In Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. (eds), Cooperative Breeding in Vertebrates: studies of ecology, evolution and behavior, pp. 318–337. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carayon, J. 1966. Traumatic insemination and the paragenital system. Monograph of Cimicidae (Hemiptera, Heteroptera), pp. 81–166. College Park, MD: Entomological Society of America.Google Scholar
Carazo, P., Tan, C.K., Allen, F., Wigby, S. & Pizzari, T. 2014. Within-group male relatedness reduces harm to females in Drosophila. Nature, 505, 672.Google Scholar
Carbone, C. & Taborsky, M. 1996. Mate choice or harassment avoidance? A question of female control at the lek. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 370–378.Google Scholar
Carey, H.V. & Moore, P. 1986. Foraging and predation risk in yellow-bellied marmots. American Midland Naturalist, 267–275.Google Scholar
Carlstead, K. 1986. Predictability of feeding: its effect on agonistic behaviour and growth in grower pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 16, 25–38.Google Scholar
Carne, C., Wiper, S. & Semple, S. 2011. Reciprocation and interchange of grooming, agonistic support, feeding tolerance, and aggression in semi-free-ranging Barbary macaques. American Journal of Primatology, 73, 1127–1133.Google Scholar
Carpenter, F.L. 1987. Food abundance and territoriality – to defend or not to defend. American Zoologist, 27, 387–399.Google Scholar
Carpenter, F.L. & Macmillen, R.E. 1976. Threshold model of feeding territoriality and test with a Hawaiian honeycreeper. Science, 194, 639–642.Google Scholar
Carter, G. 2014. The reciprocity controversy. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 1, 368–386.Google Scholar
Carter, G.G. & Wilkinson, G.S. 2013. Food sharing in vampire bats: reciprocal help predicts donations more than relatedness or harassment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280, 20122573.Google Scholar
Carter, G.G. & Wilkinson, G.S. 2015. Social benefits of non-kin food sharing by female vampire bats. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20152524.Google Scholar
Carter, G.G. & Wilkinson, G.S. 2016. Common vampire bat contact calls attract past food-sharing partners. Animal Behaviour, 116, 45–51.Google Scholar
Carter, G.G., Farine, D.R. & Wilkinson, G.S. 2017. Social bet-hedging in vampire bats. Biology Letters, 13.Google Scholar
Carter, G.G., Schino, G. & Farine, D. 2019. Challenges in assessing the roles of nepotism and reciprocity in cooperation networks. Animal Behaviour, 150, 255–271.Google Scholar
Carter, G.G., Farine, D.R., Crisp, R.J., et al. 2020. Development of new food-sharing relationships in vampire bats. Current Biology, 30, 1275–1279.Google Scholar
Case, T.J. & Gilpin, M.E. 1974. Interference competition and niche theory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 71, 3073–3077.Google Scholar
Cervo, R., Dapporto, L., Beani, L., Strassmann, J.E. & Turillazzi, S. 2008. On status badges and quality signals in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus: body size, facial colour patterns and hierarchical rank. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 1189–1196.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, S. & Jhala, Y.V. 2017. Selfish partners: resource partitioning in male coalitions of Asiatic lions. Behavioral Ecology, 28, 1532–1539.Google Scholar
Chancellor, R.L. & Isbell, L.A. 2009. Female grooming markets in a population of gray-cheeked mangabeys (Lophocebus albigena). Behavioral Ecology, 20, 79–86.Google Scholar
Chandrashekara, K. & Gadagkar, R. 1992. Queen succession in the primitively eusocial tropical wasp Ropalidia marginata (Lep.) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Journal of Insect Behaviour, 5, 193–209.Google Scholar
Chapman, S.N., Pettay, J.E., Lummaa, V. & Lahdenperä, M. 2019a. Limits to fitness benefits of prolonged post-reproductive lifespan in women. Current Biology, 29, 645–650.Google Scholar
Chapman, S.N., Jackson, J., Htut, W., Lummaa, V. & Lahdenperä, M. 2019b. Asian elephants exhibit post-reproductive lifespans. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 19, 193.Google Scholar
Chapman, T. 2006. Evolutionary conflicts of interest between males and females. Current Biology, 16, R744–R754.Google Scholar
Chapuisat, M. & Keller, L. 1999. Testing kin selection with sex allocation data in eusocial Hymenoptera. Heredity, 82, 473.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18, 237–268.Google Scholar
Charnov, E.L. 1978a. Evolution of eusocial behavior: offspring choice or parental parasitism? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 75, 451–465.Google Scholar
Charnov, E.L. 1978b. Sex-ratio selection in eusocial Hymenoptera. The American Naturalist, 112, 317–326.Google Scholar
Charnov, E.L. 1982. The Theory of Sex Allocation (18th ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chase, I. 1980. Cooperative and non-cooperative behavior in animals. American Naturalist, 115, 827–857.Google Scholar
Chellappa, S. & Huntingford, F.A. 1989. Depletion of energy reserves during reproductive aggression in male three-spined stickleback, Gasterostem aculeatus L. Journal of Fish Biology, 35, 315-316.Google Scholar
Chen, M.K. & Hauser, M. 2005. Modeling reciprocation and cooperation in primates: evidence for a punishing strategy. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 235, 5–12.Google Scholar
Chen, S.H., Fan, Z.Y., Chen, C.S. & Lu, Y.W. 2011. The breeding biology of Chinese crested terns in mixed species colonies in eastern China. Bird Conservation International, 21, 266–273.Google Scholar
Cheney, D.L. 2011. Extent and limits of cooperation in animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 10902–10909.Google Scholar
Cheney, D.L., Moscovice, L.R., Heesen, M., Mundry, R. & Seyfarth, R.M. 2010. Contingent cooperation between wild female baboons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 9562–9566.Google Scholar
Chervet, N., Zöttl, M., Schürch, R., Taborsky, M. & Heg, D. 2011. Repeatability and heritability of behavioural types in a social cichlid. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2011, 321729.Google Scholar
Chiang, Y.S. & Takahashi, N. 2011. Network homophily and the evolution of the pay-it-forward reciprocity. PLoS One, 6, e29188.Google Scholar
Chiba, S. & Leong, K. 2015. An example of conflicts of interest as pandering disincentives. Economics Letters, 131, 20–23.Google Scholar
Chiong, R. & Kirley, M. 2015. Promotion of cooperation in social dilemma games via generalised indirect reciprocity. Connection Science, 27, 417–433.Google Scholar
Choi, J.K. & Bowles, S. 2007. The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science, 318, 636–640.Google Scholar
Christe, P., Richner, H. & Oppliger, A. 1996. Of great tits and fleas: sleep baby sleep. Animal Behaviour, 52, 1087–1092.Google Scholar
Christensen, C. & Radford, A.N. 2018. Dear enemies or nasty neighbors? Causes and consequences of variation in the responses of group-living species to territorial intrusions. Behavioral Ecology, 29, 1004–1013.Google Scholar
Claidiere, N., Whiten, A., Mareno, M.C., et al. 2015. Selective and contagious prosocial resource donation in capuchin monkeys, chimpanzees and humans. Scientific Reports, 5, 7631.Google Scholar
Clark, C.W. & Mangel, M. 1986. The evolutionary advantages of group foraging. Theoretical Population Biology, 30, 45–75.Google Scholar
Clarke, F.M. & Faulkes, C.G. 1997. Dominance and queen succession in captive colonies of the eusocial naked mole-rat, Heterocephalus glaber. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 264, 993–1000.Google Scholar
Clarke, F.M. & Faulkes, C.C. 2001. Intracolony aggression in the eusocial naked mole-rat, Heterocephalus glaber. Animal Behaviour, 61, 311–324.Google Scholar
Clarke, F.M., Miethe, G.H. & Bennett, N.C. 2001. Reproductive suppression in female Damaraland mole-rats Cryptomys damarensis: dominant control or self-restraint? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268, 899–909.Google Scholar
Clarke, M.F. 1984. Co-operative breeding by the Australian bell miner Manorina melanophrys Latham: a test of kin selection theory. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 14, 137–146.Google Scholar
Clarke, M.F. 1989. The pattern of helping in the bell miner (Manorina melanophrys). Ethology, 80, 292–306.Google Scholar
Clarke, M.F. & Heathcote, C.F. 1990. Dispersal, survivorship and demography in the co-operatively-breeding bell miner Manorina melanophrys. Emu, 90, 15–23.Google Scholar
Clobert, J., Danchin, E., Dhondt, A.A. & Nichols, J. 2001. Dispersal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H. 1985. Size, sexual dimorphism, and polygyny in primates. In Jungers, W.L. (ed.), Size and Scaling in Primate Biology. Advances in Primatology, pp. 51–60. Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H. 1991. The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. 2002. Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science, 296(5565), 69–72.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. 2009. Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies. Nature, 462, 51–57.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. & Huchard, E. 2013a. Social competition and its consequences in female mammals. Journal of Zoology, 289, 151–171.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Huchard, E. 2013b. Social competition and selection in males and females. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368, 20130074.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Lukas, D. 2012. The evolution of social philopatry and dispersal in female mammals. Molecular Ecology, 21, 472–492.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Manser, M. 2016. Meerkats: cooperative breeding in the Kalahari. In Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. (eds), Cooperative Breeding in Vertebrates, pp. 294–317. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Parker, G.A. 1995a. Punishment in animal societies. Nature, 373, 209–216.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Parker, G.A. 1995b. Sexual coercion in animal societies. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1345–1365.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. & Sheldon, B.C. 2010. Individuals and populations: the role of long-term, individual-based studies of animals in ecology and evolutionary biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 562–573.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H., Albon, S.D. & Guinness, F.E. 1989. Fitness costs of gestation and lactation in wild mammals. Nature, 337, 260.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H., Deutsch, J.C. & Nefdt, R.J.C. 1993. The evolution of ungulate leks. Animal Behaviour, 46, 1121–1138.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H., Brotherton, P.N.M., Smith, R., et al. 1998. Infanticide and expulsion of females in a cooperative mammal. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 265, 2291–2295.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H., Gaynor, D., McIlrath, G.M., et al. 1999a. Predation, group size and mortality in a cooperative mongoose, Suricata suricatta. Journal of Animal Ecology, 68, 672–683.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H., O’Riain, M.J., Brotherton, P.N., et al. 1999b. Selfish sentinels in cooperative mammals. Science, 284, 1640–1644.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H., Brotherton, P.N.M., O’Riain, M.J., et al. 2000. Individual contributions to babysitting in a cooperative mongoose, Suricata suricatta. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 267, 301–305.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H., Brotherton, P.N.M., O’Riain, M.J., et al. 2001a. Contributions to cooperative rearing in meerkats. Animal Behaviour, 61, 705–710.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H., Brotherton, P.N., Russell, A.F., et al. 2001b. Cooperation, control, and concession in meerkat groups. Science, 291, 478–481.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H., Russell, A.F., Sharpe, L.L. & Jordan, N.R. 2005. ‘False feeding’ and aggression in meerkat societies. Animal Behaviour, 69, 1273–1284.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H., Hodge, S.J. & Flower, T.P. 2008. Group size and the suppression of subordinate reproduction in Kalahari meerkats. Animal Behaviour, 76, 689–700.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T.H., Hodge, S.J., Flower, T.P., Spong, G.F. & Young, A.J. 2010. Adaptive suppression of subordinate reproduction in cooperative mammals. The American Naturalist, 176, 664–673.Google Scholar
Cockburn, A. 1998. Evolution of helping behavior in cooperatively breeding birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29, 141–177.Google Scholar
Cockburn, A. 2004. Mating systems and sexual conflict in birds. In Koenig, W. & Dickinson, J. (eds), Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, pp. 81–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cockburn, A. 2006. Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1375–1383.Google Scholar
Cockburn, A., Osmond, H.L., Mulder, R.A., Double, M.C. & Green, D.J. 2008. Demography of male reproductive queues in cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wrens Malurus cyaneus. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77, 297–304.Google Scholar
Coffie, P.A. 1998. Status of the spinynose sculpin, Asemichthys taylori, in Canada. Canadian Field Naturalist, 112, 130–132.Google Scholar
Cohen, L.B. & Dearborn, D.C. 2004. Great frigatebirds, Fregata minor, choose mates that are genetically similar. Animal Behaviour, 68, 1229–1236.Google Scholar
Collar, N.J. & Stuart, S.N. 1985. Threatened Birds of Africa and Related Islands: The ICBP/IUCN Red Data Book.(Third Edition, Part 1). Cambridge: International Council for Bird Preservation, and International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
Concannon, M.R., Stein, A.C. & Uy, J.A. 2012. Kin selection may contribute to lek evolution and trait introgression across an avian hybrid zone. Molecular Ecology, 21, 1477–1486.Google Scholar
Connor, R.C. 1986. Pseudo-reciprocity – investing in mutualism. Animal Behaviour, 34, 1562–1566.Google Scholar
Connor, R.C. 1995a. The benefits of mutualism – a conceptual framework. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 70, 427–457.Google Scholar
Connor, R.C. 1995b. Impala allogrooming and the parceling model of reciprocity. Animal Behaviour, 49, 528–530.Google Scholar
Connor, R.C. 1995c. Altruism among non-relatives – alternatives to the prisoners-dilemma. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10, 84–86.Google Scholar
Connor, R.C. & Curry, R.L. 1995. Helping non-relatives – a role for deceit. Animal Behaviour, 49, 389–393.Google Scholar
Connor, R.C., Cioffi, W.R., Randic, S., et al. 2017. Male alliance behaviour and mating access varies with habitat in a dolphin social network. Scientific Reports, 7, 46354.Google Scholar
Conrad, K.F., Robertson, R.J. & Boag, P.T. 1998. Frequency of extrapair young increases in second broods of eastern phoebes. The Auk, 115, 497–502.Google Scholar
Conradt, L., Krause, J., Couzin, I.D. & Roper, T.J. 2009. ‘Leading according to need’ in self-organizing groups. The American Naturalist, 173, 304–312.Google Scholar
Cook, D.F. 1990. Differences in courtship, mating and postcopulatory behaviour between male morphs of the dung beetle Onthophagus binodis Thunberg (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Animal Behaviour, 40, 428–436.Google Scholar
Cook, J.M., Compton, S.G., Herre, E.A. & West, S.A. 1997. Alternative mating tactics and extreme male dimorphism in fig wasps. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 264, 747–754.Google Scholar
Cooke, S.J., Schreer, J.F., Wahl, D.H. & Philipp, D.P. 2010. Cardiovascular performance of six species of field-acclimatized centrarchid sunfish during the parental care period. Journal of Experimental Biology, 213, 2332–2342.Google Scholar
Coolen, I., van Bergen, Y., Day, R.L. & Laland, K.N. 2003. Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270, 2413–2419.Google Scholar
Cooney, R. & Bennett, N.C. 2000. Inbreeding avoidance and reproductive skew in a cooperative mammal. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 267, 801–806.Google Scholar
Cooper, G.A., Levin, S.R., Wild, G. & West, S.A. 2018. Modeling relatedness and demography in social evolution. Evolution Letters, 2, 260–271.Google Scholar
Cooper, M.A., Aureli, F. & Singh, M. 2004. Between-group encounters among bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 56, 217–227.Google Scholar
Copeland, S.R., Sponheimer, M., de Ruiter, D.J., et al. 2011. Strontium isotope evidence for landscape use by early hominins. Nature, 474, 76–78.Google Scholar
Cordero, O.X., Ventouras, L.A., DeLong, E.F. & Polz, M.F. 2012. Public good dynamics drive evolution of iron acquisition strategies in natural bacterioplankton populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 20059–20064.Google Scholar
Cords, M. 2002. Friendship among adult female blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis). Behaviour, 139, 291–314.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, T., Cintra, F. & Santos, J.C. 2016. Shelter-building insects and their role as ecosystem engineers. Neotropical entomology, 45, 1–12.Google Scholar
Cornforth, D.M., Sumpter, D.J., Brown, S.P. & Brannstrom, A. 2012. Synergy and group size in microbial cooperation. American Naturalist, 180, 296–305.Google Scholar
Corning, P.A. & Szathmary, E. 2015. ‘Synergistic selection’: a Darwinian frame for the evolution of complexity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 371, 45–58.Google Scholar
Cornwallis, C.K., West, S.A. & Griffin, A.S. 2009. Routes to indirect fitness in cooperatively breeding vertebrates: kin discrimination and limited dispersal. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22, 2445–2457.Google Scholar
Cornwallis, C.K., West, S.A., Davis, K.E. & Griffin, A.S. 2010. Promiscuity and the evolutionary transition to complex societies. Nature, 466, 969–972.Google Scholar
Cornwallis, C.K., Botero, C.A., Rubenstein, D.R., et al. 2017. Cooperation facilitates the colonization of harsh environments. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1, 0057.Google Scholar
Courchamp, F., Grenfell, B. & Clutton-Brock, T. 1999. Population dynamics of obligate cooperators. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 266, 557–563.Google Scholar
Courtene-Jones, W. & Briffa, M. 2014. Boldness and asymmetric contests: role-and outcome-dependent effects of fighting in hermit crabs. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 1073–1082.Google Scholar
Couzin, I.D. & Krause, J. 2003. Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 32, 1–75.Google Scholar
Couzin, I.D., Krause, J., James, R., Ruxton, G.D. & Franks, N.R. 2002. Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 218, 1–11.Google Scholar
Covas, R. & Griesser, M. 2007. Life history and the evolution of family living in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 1349–1357.Google Scholar
Covas, R., Doutrelant, C. & du Plessis, M.A. 2004. Experimental evidence of a link between breeding conditions and the decision to breed or to help in a colonial cooperative bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271, 827–832.Google Scholar
Covas, R., Dalecky, A., Caizergues, A. & Doutrelant, C. 2006. Kin associations and direct vs indirect fitness benefits in colonial cooperatively breeding sociable weavers Philetairus socius. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 60, 323–331.Google Scholar
Cox, J.A. 2012. Social grooming in the brown-headed nuthatch may have expanded functions. Southeastern Naturalist, 11, 771–774.Google Scholar
Coyne, J.A. & Sohn, J.J. 1978. Interspecific brood care in fishes: reciprocal altruism or mistaken identity? The American Naturalist, 112, 447–450.Google Scholar
Craig, D.M. 1982. Group selection versus individual selection – an experimental analysis. Evolution, 36, 271–282.Google Scholar
Crawford, J.C., Liu, Z., Nelson, T.A., Nielsen, C.K. & Bloomquist, C.K. 2009. Genetic population structure within and between beaver (Castor canadensis) populations in Illinois. Journal of Mammalogy, 90, 373–379.Google Scholar
Creel, S. & Creel, N.M. 1995. Communal hunting and pack size in African wild dogs, Lycaon pictus. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1325–1339.Google Scholar
Creel, S. & Creel, N.M. 2002. The African Wild Dog: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Creel, S.R., Monfort, S.L., Wildt, D.E. & Waser, P.M. 1991. Spontaneous lactation is an adaptive result of pseudopregnancy. Nature, 351, 660.Google Scholar
Creel, S., Schuette, P. & Christianson, D. 2014. Effects of predation risk on group size, vigilance, and foraging behavior in an African ungulate community. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 773–784.Google Scholar
Cremer, S., Armitage, S.A.O. & Schmid-Hempel, P. 2007. Social immunity. Current Biology, 17, R693–R702.Google Scholar
Crespi, B.J. & Ragsdale, J.E. 2000. A skew model for the evolution of sociality via manipulation: why it is better to be feared than loved. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 267, 821–828.Google Scholar
Crick, H.Q.P. 1992. Load-lightening in cooperatively breeding birds and the cost of reproduction. Ibis, 134, 56–61.Google Scholar
Crick, J., Suchak, M., Eppley, T.M., Campbell, M.W. & de Waal, F.B. 2013. The roles of food quality and sex in chimpanzee sharing behavior (Pan troglodytes). Behaviour, 150, 1203–1224.Google Scholar
Crimaldi, J.P. 2012. The role of structured stirring and mixing on gamete dispersal and aggregation in broadcast spawning. Journal of Experimental Biology, 215, 1031–1039.Google Scholar
Crimaldi, J.P. & Zimmer, R.K. 2014. The physics of broadcast spawning in benthic invertebrates. Annual Review of Marine Science, 6(6), 141–165.Google Scholar
Croft, D.P., James, R., Thomas, P.O.R., et al. 2006. Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59, 644–650.Google Scholar
Croft, D.P., Krause, J., Darden, S.K., et al. 2009. Behavioural trait assortment in a social network: patterns and implications. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63, 1495–1503.Google Scholar
Croft, D.P., Brent, L.J., Franks, D.W. & Cant, M.A. 2015. The evolution of prolonged life after reproduction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30, 407–416.Google Scholar
Croft, D.P., Johnstone, R.A., Ellis, S., et al. 2017. Reproductive conflict and the evolution of menopause in killer whales. Current Biology, 27, 298–304.Google Scholar
Crompton, B., Thomason, J.C. & McLachlan, A. 2003. Mating in a viscous universe: the race is to the agile, not to the swift. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270, 1991–1995.Google Scholar
Cronin, K.A., Schroeder, K.K.E. & Snowdon, C.T. 2010. Prosocial behaviour emerges independent of reciprocity in cottontop tamarins. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 3845–3851.Google Scholar
Crook, J.H. 1972. Sexual selection, dimorphism and social organization in the primates. In Campbell, B.G. (ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Crozier, R.G. & Giese, R.L. 1967a. The Columbian timber beetle, Corthylus columbianus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). III. Definition of epiphytotics. Journal of Economic Entomology, 60, 55–58.Google Scholar
Crozier, R.G. & Giese, R.L. 1967b. The Columbian timber beetle, Corthylus columbianus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). IV. Intrastand population distribution. The Canadian Entomologist, 99, 1203–1214.Google Scholar
Crozier, R.H. & Pamilo, P. 1996. Evolution of Social Insect Colonies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cubaynes, S., MacNulty, D.R., Stahler, D.R., et al. 2014. Density-dependent intraspecific aggression regulates survival in northern Yellowstone wolves (Canis lupus). Journal of Animal Ecology, 83, 1344–1356.Google Scholar
Curry, R.L. 1988. Influence of kinship on helping behavior in Galapagos mockingbirds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 22, 141–152.Google Scholar
Curry, R.L. & Grant, P.R. 1990. Galapagos mockingbirds: territorial cooperative breeding in a climatically variable environment. In Stacey, P.B. & Koenig, W.D. (eds), Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Long-Term Studies of Ecology and Behavior, pp. 291–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dandekar, A.A., Chugani, S. & Greenberg, E.P. 2012. Bacterial quorum sensing and metabolic incentives to cooperate. Science, 338, 264–266.Google Scholar
Daniels, R.A. 1978. Nesting behaviour of Harpagifer bispinis in Arthur Harbour, Antarctic Peninsula. Journal of Fish Biology, 12, 465–474.Google Scholar
Daniels, R.A. 1979. Nest guard replacement in the Antarctic fish Harpagifer bispinis: possible altruistic behavior. Science, 205, 831–833.Google Scholar
Darch, S.E., West, S.A., Winzer, K. & Diggle, S.P. 2012. Density-dependent fitness benefits in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 8259–8263.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dausmann, K.H., Glos, J., Ganzhorn, J.U. & Heldmaier, G. 2004. Physiology: hibernation in a tropical primate – even in the wound-down hibernating state, this lemur can warm up without waking up. Nature, 429, 825–826.Google Scholar
David, M., Gillingham, M.A.F., Salignon, M., Laskowski, K.L. & Giraldeau, L.A. 2014. Speed–accuracy trade-off and its consequences in a scramble competition context. Animal Behaviour, 90, 255–262.Google Scholar
Davies, N.B. 1986. Reproductive success of dunnocks, Prunella modularis, in a variable mating system. I. Factors influencing provisioning rate, nestling weight and fledging success. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 55, 123–138.Google Scholar
Davies, N.B. 1992. Dunnock Behaviour and Social Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, N.B. & Brooke, M. de L. 1988. Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Animal Behaviour, 36, 262–284.Google Scholar
Davies, N.B. & Brooke, M. de L. 1989a. An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I. Host egg discrimination. Journal of Animal Ecology, 58, 207–214.Google Scholar
Davies, N.B. & Brooke, M. de L. 1989b. An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus and its hosts. II. Host egg markings, chick discrimination and general discussion. Journal of Animal Ecology, 58, 225–236.Google Scholar
Davies, N.B. & Houston, A.I. 1981. Owners and satellites: the economics of territory defence in the pied wagtail, Motacilla alba. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 157–180.Google Scholar
Davies, N.B. & Lundberg, A. 1984. Food distribution and a variable mating system in the dunnock, Prunella modularis. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 895–912.Google Scholar
Davies, N.B., Bourke, A.F.G. & Brooke, M. de L. 1989. Cuckoos and parasitic ants – interspecific brood parasitism as an evolutionary arms-race. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 4, 274–278.Google Scholar
Davies, N.B., Kilner, R.M. & Noble, D.G. 1998. Nestling cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, exploit hosts with begging calls that mimic a brood. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 265, 673–678.Google Scholar
Davis, D.E. 1953. The characteristics of rat populations. Quarterly Review of Biology, 28, 373–401.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R., Krebs, J.R., Maynard, S.J. & Holliday, R. 1979. Arms races between and within species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 205, 489–511.Google Scholar
De Boer, B.A. 1981. Influence of population density on the territorial, courting and spawning behaviour of male Chromis cyanea (Pomacentridae). Behaviour, 77, 99–120.Google Scholar
De Fine Licht, H. & Biedermann, P.H. 2012. Patterns of functional enzyme activity in fungus farming ambrosia beetles. Frontiers in Zoology, 9, 13.Google Scholar
de Kort, S.R., Emery, N.J. & Clayton, N.S. 2006. Food sharing in jackdaws, Corvus monedula: what, why and with whom? Animal Behaviour, 72, 297–304.Google Scholar
De Leon, L.F., Podos, J., Gardezi, T., Herrel, A. & Hendry, A.P. 2014. Darwin’s finches and their diet niches: the sympatric coexistence of imperfect generalists. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 27, 1093–1104.Google Scholar
de Luca, D.W. & Ginsberg, J.R. 2001. Dominance, reproduction and survival in banded mongooses: towards an egalitarian social system? Animal Behaviour, 61, 17–30.Google Scholar
de Ruiter, J.R. & Geffen, E. 1998. Relatedness of matrilines, dispersing males and social groups in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 265, 79–87.Google Scholar
De Souza, A.R. & Prezoto, F. 2012. Aggressive interactions for a decentralized regulation of foraging activity in the social wasp Polistes versicolor. Insectes Sociaux, 59, 463–467.Google Scholar
de Waal, F.B.M. 1989. Food sharing and reciprocal obligations among chimpanzees. Journal of Human Evolution, 18, 433–459.Google Scholar
de Waal, F.B.M. 1997a. Food transfers through mesh in brown capuchins. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 370–378.Google Scholar
de Waal, F.B.M. 1997b. The chimpanzee’s service economy: food for grooming. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 375–386.Google Scholar
de Waal, F.B.M. 2000. Attitudinal reciprocity in food sharing among brown capuchin monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 60, 253–261.Google Scholar
de Waal, F.B. & Brosnan, S.F. 2006. Simple and complex reciprocity in primates. In Kappeler, P.M. & van Schaik, C.P. (eds), Cooperation in Primates and Humans, pp. 85–105. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
de Waal, F.B. & Luttrell, L.M. 1988. Mechanisms of social reciprocity in three primate species: symmetrical relationship characteristics or cognition? Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 101–118.Google Scholar
Dechmann, D.K., Kranstauber, B., Gibbs, D. & Wikelski, M. 2010. Group hunting – a reason for sociality in molossid bats? PLoS One, 5.Google Scholar
Delattre, O., Blatrix, R., Châline, N., et al. 2012. Do host species evolve a specific response to slave-making ants? Frontiers in Zoology, 9, 38.Google Scholar
DeLay, L.S., Faaborg, J., Naranjo, J., et al. 1996. Paternal care in the cooperatively polyandrous Galapagos hawk. Condor, 98, 300–311.Google Scholar
Delgado, M.M., Nicholas, M., Petrie, D.J. & Jacobs, L.F. 2014. Fox squirrels match food assessment and cache effort to value and scarcity. PLoS One, 9.Google Scholar
Delmas, G.E., Lew, S.E. & Zanutto, B.S. 2019. High mutual cooperation rates in rats learning reciprocal altruism: the role of pay-off matrix. PLoS One, 14.Google Scholar
Demsar, J. & Bajec, I.L. 2013. Family bird: a heterogeneous simulated flock. In Advances in Artificial Life, ECAL 12, pp. 1114–1115.Google Scholar
Denault, L.K. & Mcfarlane, D.A. 1995. Reciprocal altruism between male vampire bats, Desmodus rotundus. Animal Behaviour, 49, 855–856.Google Scholar
Desjardins, J.K., Stiver, K.A., Fitzpatrick, J.L. & Balshine, S. 2008a. Differential responses to territory intrusions in cooperatively breeding fish. Animal Behaviour, 75, 595–604.Google Scholar
Desjardins, J.K., Stiver, K.A., Fitzpatrick, J.L., et al. 2008b. Sex and status in a cooperative breeding fish: behavior and androgens. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 785–794.Google Scholar
DeWoody, J.A., Fletcher, D.E., Wilkins, S.D. & Avise, J.C. 2001. Genetic documentation of filial cannibalism in nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 5090–5092.Google Scholar
Dey, C.J., Reddon, A.R., O’Connor, C.M. & Balshine, S. 2013. Network structure is related to social conflict in a cooperatively breeding fish. Animal Behaviour, 85, 395–402.Google Scholar
Dey, C.J., O’Connor, C.M., Wilkinson, H., et al. 2017. Direct benefits and evolutionary transitions to complex societies. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(5), 137.Google Scholar
Díaz-Muñoz, S.L., DuVal, E.H., Krakauer, A.H. & Lacey, E.A. 2014. Cooperating to compete: altruism, sexual selection and causes of male reproductive cooperation. Animal Behaviour, 88, 67–78.Google Scholar
DiBitetti, M.S. 1997. Evidence for an important social role of allogrooming in a platyrrhine primate. Animal Behaviour, 54, 199–211.Google Scholar
Dickinson, J.L. 2004. A test of the importance of direct and indirect fitness benefits for helping decisions in western bluebirds. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 233–238.Google Scholar
Dickinson, J.L. & Akre, J.J. 1998. Extrapair paternity, inclusive fitness, and within-group benefits of helping in western bluebirds. Molecular Ecology, 7, 95–105.Google Scholar
Dickinson, J.L. & Hatchwell, B.J. 2004. Fitness consequences of helping. In Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. (eds), Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, pp. 48–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dickinson, J.L. & McGowan, A. 2005. Winter resource wealth drives delayed dispersal and family-group living in western bluebirds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272, 2423–2428.Google Scholar
Dickinson, J.L., Koenig, W.D. & Pitelka, F.A. 1996. Fitness consequences of helping behavior in the western bluebird. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 168–177.Google Scholar
Dickinson, J.L., Ferree, E.D., Stern, C.A., Swift, R. & Zuckerberg, B. 2014. Delayed dispersal in western bluebirds: teasing apart the importance of resources and parents. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 843–851.Google Scholar
Dierkes, P., Taborsky, M. & Kohler, U. 1999. Reproductive parasitism of broodcare helpers in a cooperatively breeding fish. Behavioral Ecology, 10, 510–515.Google Scholar
Dierkes, P., Heg, D., Taborsky, M., Skubic, E. & Achmann, R. 2005. Genetic relatedness in groups is sex-specific and declines with age of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Ecology Letters, 8, 968–975.Google Scholar
Dierkes, P., Taborsky, M. & Achmann, R. 2008. Multiple paternity in the cooperatively breeding fish Neolamprologus pulcher. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 1581–1589.Google Scholar
Diggle, S.P., Griffin, A.S., Campbell, G.S. & West, S.A. 2007. Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Nature, 450, 411–414.Google Scholar
Dijk, R.E., Kaden, J.C., Ticó, A., et al. 2014. Cooperative investment in public goods is kin directed in communal nests of social birds. Ecology Letters, 17, 1141–1148.Google Scholar
Dill, L.M. 1978. Energy-based model of optimal feeding-territory size. Theoretical Population Biology, 14, 396–429.Google Scholar
Dill, L.M., Ydenberg, R.C. & Fraser, A.H.G. 1981. Food abundance and territory size in juvenile Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Canadian Journal of Zoology–Revue Canadienne de Zoologie, 59, 1801–1809.Google Scholar
Dloniak, S.M., French, J.A. & Holekamp, K.E. 2006. Rank-related maternal effects of androgens on behaviour in wild spotted hyaenas. Nature, 440, 1190.Google Scholar
Dobson, F.S. 1982. Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammals. Animal Behaviour, 30, 1183–1192.Google Scholar
Dobson, F.S., Viblanc, V.A., Arnaud, C.M. & Murie, J.O. 2012. Kin selection in Columbian ground squirrels: direct and indirect fitness benefits. Molecular Ecology, 21, 524–531.Google Scholar
Doebeli, M. & Hauert, C. 2005. Models of cooperation based on the Prisoner’s Dilemma and the Snowdrift game. Ecology Letters, 8, 748–766.Google Scholar
Doebeli, M. & Knowlton, N. 1998. The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 8676–8680.Google Scholar
Doerr, E.D. & Doerr, V.A. 2006. Comparative demography of treecreepers: evaluating hypotheses for the evolution and maintenance of cooperative breeding. Animal Behaviour, 72, 147–159.Google Scholar
Dolivo, V. & Taborsky, M. 2015a. Norway rats reciprocate help according to the quality of help they received. Biology Letters, 11, 20140959.Google Scholar
Dolivo, V. & Taborsky, M. 2015b. Cooperation among Norway rats: the importance of visual cues for reciprocal cooperation, and the role of coercion. Ethology, 121, 1071–1080.Google Scholar
Dolivo, V. & Taborsky, M. 2017. Environmental enrichment of young adult rats (Rattus norvegicus) in different sensory modalities has long-lasting effects on their ability to learn via specific sensory channels. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 131, 79–88.Google Scholar
Dolivo, V., Rutte, C. & Taborsky, M. 2016. Ultimate and proximate mechanisms of reciprocal altruism in rats. Learning & Behavior, 44, 223–226.Google Scholar
Domeier, M.L. & Colin, P.L. 1997. Tropical reef fish spawning aggregations: defined and reviewed. Bulletin of Marine Science, 60, 698–726.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L., Thompson, F.J., Field, J. & Cant, M.A. 2013. Do paper wasps negotiate over helping effort? Behavioral Ecology, 25, 88–94.Google Scholar
Double, M.C. & Cockburn, A. 2003. Subordinate superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) parasitize the reproductive success of attractive dominant males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270, 379–384.Google Scholar
Double, M.C., Peakall, R., Beck, N.R. & Cockburn, A. 2005. Dispersal, philopatry, and infidelity: dissecting local genetic structure in superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus). Evolution, 59, 625–635.Google Scholar
Dowds, B.M. & Elwood, R.W. 1985. Shell wars II: the influence of relative size on decisions made during hermit crab shell fights. Animal Behaviour, 33, 649–656.Google Scholar
Dowling, D.K., Richardson, D.S., Blaakmeer, K. & Komdeur, J. 2001. Feather mite loads influenced by salt exposure, age and reproductive stage in the Seychelles warbler Acrocephalus sechellensis. Journal of Avian Biology, 32, 364–369.Google Scholar
Downing, P.A., Griffin, A.S. & Cornwallis, C.K. 2018. Sex differences in helping effort reveal the effect of future reproduction on cooperative behaviour in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 285, 20181164.Google Scholar
Doyle, R.W. & Talbot, A.J. 1986. Artificial selection on growth and correlated selection on competitive behaviour in fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 43, 1059–1064.Google Scholar
Drea, C.M. & Carter, A.N. 2009. Cooperative problem solving in a social carnivore. Animal Behaviour, 78, 967–977.Google Scholar
Drury, D.W., Siniard, A.L. & Wade, M.J. 2009. Genetic differentiation among wild populations of Tribolium castaneum estimated using microsatellite markers. Journal of Heredity, 100, 732–741.Google Scholar
Drury, J.P., Okamoto, K.W., Anderson, C.N. & Grether, G.F. 2015. Reproductive interference explains persistence of aggression between species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20142256.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, M.A. 1993. Helping behaviour in cooperatively-breeding green woodhoopoes: selected or unselected trait? Behaviour, 127, 49–65.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, M.A. & Williams, J.B. 1994. Communal cavity roosting in green woodhoopoes – consequences for energy-expenditure and the seasonal pattern of mortality. Auk, 111, 292–299.Google Scholar
Dubois, F. & Giraldeau, L.A. 2003. The forager’s dilemma: food sharing and food defense as risk-sensitive foraging options. The American Naturalist, 162, 768–779.Google Scholar
Duckworth, R.A. & Badyaev, A.V. 2007. Coupling of dispersal and aggression facilitates the rapid range expansion of a passerine bird. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 15017–15022.Google Scholar
Dufour, V., Pele, M., Neumann, M., Thierry, B. & Call, J. 2009. Calculated reciprocity after all: computation behind token transfers in orang-utans. Biology Letters, 5, 172–175.Google Scholar
Duftner, N., Sefc, K.M., Koblmuller, S., et al. 2007. Parallel evolution of facial stripe patterns in the Neolamprologus brichardi/pulcher species complex endemic to Lake Tanganyika. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 45, 706–715.Google Scholar
Dugatkin, L.A. 1997. Cooperation Among Animals: an Evolutionary Perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dugatkin, L.A. 2002. Animal cooperation among unrelated individuals. Naturwissenschaften, 89, 533–541.Google Scholar
Dugatkin, L.A. & Alfieri, M. 1991. Guppies and the TIT FOR TAT strategy: preference based on past interaction. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 28, 243–246.Google Scholar
Dugatkin, L.A. & Biederman, L. 1991. Balancing asymmetries in resource holding power and resource value in the pumpkinseed sunfish. Animal Behaviour, 42, 691–692.Google Scholar
Dumke, M., Herberstein, M.E. & Schneider, J.M. 2018. Advantages of social foraging in crab spiders: groups capture more and larger prey despite the absence of a web. Ethology, 124, 695–705.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R.I.M. & Dunbar, P. 1988. Maternal time budgets of gelada baboons. Animal Behaviour, 36, 970–980.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R.I.M. & Sharman, M. 1984. Is social grooming altruistic? Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie – Journal of Comparative Ethology, 64, 163–173.Google Scholar
Duncan, C., Gaynor, D., Clutton-Brock, T. & Dyble, M. 2019. The evolution of indiscriminate altruism in a cooperatively breeding mammal. The American Naturalist, 193, 841–851.Google Scholar
Duncan, F.D. & Crewe, R.M. 1994. Group hunting in a ponerine ant, Leptogenys nitida Smith. Oecologia, 97, 118–123.Google Scholar
Dunford, C. 1977. Behavioral limitation of round-tailed ground squirrel density. Ecology, 58, 1254–1268.Google Scholar
Dunn, J., Dunn, D.W., Strand, M.R. & Hardy, I.C.W. 2014. Higher aggression towards closer relatives by soldier larvae in a polyembryonic wasp. Biology Letters, 10, 20140229.Google Scholar
Dunn, P.O., Cockburn, A. & Mulder, R.A. 1995. Fairy-wren helpers often care for young to which they are unrelated. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 259, 339–343.Google Scholar
Durrant, R. 2011. Collective violence: an evolutionary perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 428–436.Google Scholar
DuVal, E.H. 2007a. Social organization and variation in cooperative alliances among male lance-tailed manakins. Animal Behaviour, 73, 391–401.Google Scholar
DuVal, E.H. 2007b. Cooperative display and lekking behavior of the lance-tailed manakin (Chiroxiphia lanceolata). Auk, 124, 1168–1185.Google Scholar
DuVal, E.H. 2007c. Adaptive advantages of cooperative courtship for subordinate male lance-tailed manakins. American Naturalist, 169, 423–432.Google Scholar
Earley, R.L. & Dugatkin, L.A. 2002. Eavesdropping on visual cues in green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) fights: a case for networking. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269, 943–952.Google Scholar
Ebensperger, L.A., Hurtado, M.J. & Valdivia, I. 2006. Lactating females do not discriminate between their own young and unrelated pups in the communally breeding rodent, Octodon degus. Ethology, 112, 921–929.Google Scholar
Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ebersole, J.P. 1977. The adaptive significance of interspecific territoriality in the reef fish Eupomacentrus leucostictus. Ecology, 58, 914–920.Google Scholar
Eccard, J.A. & Ylönen, H. 2002. Direct interference or indirect exploitation? An experimental study of fitness costs of interspecific competition in voles. Oikos, 99, 580–590.Google Scholar
Edenbrow, M., Bleakley, B.H., Darden, S.K., et al. 2017. The evolution of cooperation: interacting phenotypes among social partners. American Naturalist, 189, 630–643.Google Scholar
Edvardsson, M. & Tregenza, T. 2005. Why do male Callosobruchus maculatus harm their mates? Behavioral Ecology, 16, 788–793.Google Scholar
Edwards, S.V. 1993. Mitochondrial gene genealogy and gene flow among island and mainland populations of a sedentary songbird, the grey-crowned babbler (Pomatostomus temporalis). Evolution, 47, 1118–1137.Google Scholar
Eikenaar, C., Richardson, D.S., Brouwer, L. & Komdeur, J. 2007. Parent presence, delayed dispersal, and territory acquisition in the Seychelles warbler. Behavioral Ecology, 18, 874–879.Google Scholar
Eikenaar, C., Richardson, D.S., Brouwer, L. & Komdeur, J. 2008a. Sex biased natal dispersal in a closed, saturated population of Seychelles warblers Acrocephalus sechellensis. Journal of Avian Biology, 39, 73–80.Google Scholar
Eikenaar, C., Richardson, D.S., Brouwer, L., Bristol, R. & Komdeur, J. 2008b. Experimental evaluation of sex differences in territory acquisition in a cooperatively breeding bird. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 207–214.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, J.F., Muckenhirn, N.A. & Rudran, R. 1972. The relation between ecology and social structure in primates. Science, 176, 863–874.Google Scholar
Ekman, J. 2004. Delayed dispersal. In Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. (eds), Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, pp. 35–47. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, J. & Griesser, M. 2002. Why offspring delay dispersal: experimental evidence for a role of parental tolerance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1709–1713.Google Scholar
Ekman, J., Sklepkovych, B. & Tegelstrom, H. 1994. Offspring retention in the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus): the prolonged brood care hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology, 5, 245–253.Google Scholar
Ekman, J., Baglione, V., Eggers, S. & Griesser, M. 2001. Delayed dispersal: living under the reign of nepotistic parents. The Auk, 118, 1–10.Google Scholar
Ekvall, K. 1998. Effects of social organization, age and aggressive behaviour on allosuckling in wild fallow deer. Animal Behaviour, 56, 695–703.Google Scholar
El Mouden, C. & Gardner, A. 2008. Nice natives and mean migrants: the evolution of dispersal-dependent social behaviour in viscous populations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 1480–1491.Google Scholar
El Mouden, C., West, S.A. & Gardner, A. 2010. The enforcement of cooperation by policing. Evolution, 64, 2139–2152.Google Scholar
Eldakar, O.T., Dlugos, M.J., Pepper, J.W. & Wilson, D.S. 2009. Population structure mediates sexual conflict in water striders. Science, 326, 816.Google Scholar
Elgar, M.A. 1986. House sparrows establish foraging flocks by giving chirrup calls if the resources are divisible. Animal Behaviour, 34, 169–174.Google Scholar
Ellis, S., Franks, D.W., Nattrass, S., et al. 2018. Analyses of ovarian activity reveal repeated evolution of post-reproductive lifespans in toothed whales. Scientific Reports, 8, 1–10.Google Scholar
Elwood, R.W. 1991. Ethical implications of studies on infanticide and maternal aggression in rodents. Animal Behaviour, 42, 841–849.Google Scholar
Emlen, D.J. 1997. Alternative reproductive tactics and male-dimorphism in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 335–341.Google Scholar
Emlen, S.T. 1982. The evolution of helping. I. An ecological constraints model. The American Naturalist, 119, 29–39.Google Scholar
Emlen, S.T. 1991. Evolution of cooperative breeding in birds and mammals. In Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. (eds), Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (3rd ed.), pp. 301–337. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Emlen, S.T. 1995. An evolutionary theory of the family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 92, 8092–8099.Google Scholar
Emlen, S.T. 1997. Predicting family dynamics in social vertebrates. In Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. (eds), Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (4th ed.), pp. 228–253. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Emlen, S.T. & Oring, L.W. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–223.Google Scholar
Emlen, S.T. & Wrege, P.H. 1988. The role of kinship in helping decisions among white-fronted bee-eaters. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 23, 305–315.Google Scholar
Emlen, S.T. & Wrege, P.H. 1991. Breeding biology of white-fronted bee-eaters at Nakuru – the influence of helpers on breeder fitness. Journal of Animal Ecology, 60, 309–326.Google Scholar
Emlen, S.T., Reeve, H.K., Sherman, P.W., et al. 1991. Adaptive versus nonadaptive explanations of behavior: the case of alloparental helping. The American Naturalist, 138, 259–270.Google Scholar
Emonds, G., Declerck, C.H., Boone, C., Vandervliet, E.J. & Parizel, P.M. 2012. The cognitive demands on cooperation in social dilemmas: an fMRI study. Social Neuroscience, 7, 494–509.Google Scholar
Endler, A., Hölldobler, B. & Liebig, J. 2007. Lack of physical policing and fertility cues in egg-laying workers of the ant Camponotus floridanus. Animal Behaviour, 74, 1171–1180.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, S.C. & Taborsky, M. 2020. Broad definitions of enforcement are unhelpful for understanding evolutionary mechanisms of cooperation. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4, 323.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, S.C., Weladji, R.B., Holand, O., Roed, K.H. & Nieminen, M. 2015. Evidence of reciprocal allonursing in reindeer, Rangifer tarandus. Ethology, 121, 245–259.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, S.C., Bergeron, P., Gagnon, A., Dillon, L. & Pelletier, F. 2019. Using geographical distance as a potential proxy for help in the assessment of the grandmother hypothesis. Current Biology, 29, 651–656.Google Scholar
Engelmann, J.M., Herrmann, E. & Tomasello, M. 2015. Chimpanzees trust conspecifics to engage in low-cost reciprocity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20142083.Google Scholar
Enquist, M. & Leimar, O. 1983. Evolution of fighting behaviour: decision rules and assessment of relative strength. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 102, 387–410.Google Scholar
Enquist, M. & Leimar, O. 1987. Evolution of fighting behaviour: the effect of variation in resource value. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 127, 187–205.Google Scholar
Engqvist, L. & Taborsky, M. 2016. The evolution of genetic and conditional alternative reproductive tactics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 283, 20152945.Google Scholar
Eppley, T.M., Watzek, J., Dausmann, K.H., Ganzhorn, J.U. & Donati, G. 2017. Huddling is more important than rest site selection for thermoregulation in southern bamboo lemurs. Animal Behaviour, 127, 153–161.Google Scholar
Eriksson, J., Siedel, H., Lukas, D., et al. 2006. Y-chromosome analysis confirms highly sex-biased dispersal and suggests a low male effective population size in bonobos (Pan paniscus). Molecular Ecology, 15, 939–949.Google Scholar
Ermeidou, C. 2016. The influence of kinship on helper acceptance and reproductive behaviour in the cooperatively breeding fish Neolamrologus pulcher. MSc thesis, University of Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Ermeidou, C., Taborsky, M. & Frommen, J.G. 2021. Inbreeding depression, but no inbreeding avoidance in the cichlid fish Neolamprologus pulcher. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Eshel, I. & Shaked, A. 2001. Partnership. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 208, 457–474.Google Scholar
Espmark, Y. & Knudsen, T. 2001. Intraspecific brood adoption in the convict cichlid with respect to fry of two colour morphs. Journal of Fish Biology, 59, 504–514.Google Scholar
Estrela, S., Libby, E., Van Cleve, J., et al. 2019. Environmentally mediated social dilemmas. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34, 6–18.Google Scholar
Ewald, P.W. & Carpenter, F.L. 1978. Territorial responses to energy manipulations in the Anna hummingbird. Oecologia, 31, 277–292.Google Scholar
Faber, D.B. & Baylis, J.R. 1993. Effects of body size on agonistic encounters between male jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). Animal Behaviour, 45, 289–299.Google Scholar
Fagan, J. & Meares, T.L. 2008. Punishment, deterrence and social control: the paradox of punishment in minority communities. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 173.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, B.M. & Dobson, F.S. 2010. Kinship does not affect vigilance in Columbian ground squirrels (Urocitellus columbianus). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 88, 266–270.Google Scholar
Faria, G.S. & Gardner, A. 2020. Does kin discrimination promote cooperation? Biology Letters, 16(3), 20190742.Google Scholar
Farine, D.R., Garroway, C.J. & Sheldon, B.C. 2012. Social network analysis of mixed-species flocks: exploring the structure and evolution of interspecific social behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 84, 1271–1277.Google Scholar
Farmer, M.B. & Alonzo, S.H. 2008. Competition for territories does not explain allopaternal care in the tessellated darter. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 83, 391–395.Google Scholar
Farrell, B.D., Sequeira, A.S., O’Meara, B.C., et al. 2001. The evolution of agriculture in beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae). Evolution, 55, 2011–2027.Google Scholar
Faulkes, C.G., Arruda, M.F. & Monteiro da Cruz, M.A.O. 2003. Matrilineal genetic structure within and among populations of the cooperatively breeding common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus. Molecular Ecology, 12, 1101–1108.Google Scholar
Fawcett, T.W., Hamblin, S. & Giraldeau, L.A. 2013. Exposing the behavioral gambit: the evolution of learning and decision rules. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 2–11.Google Scholar
Feeney, W.E., Welbergen, J.A. & Langmore, N.E. 2014. Advances in the study of coevolution between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 45, 227–246.Google Scholar
Feh, C. 1999. Alliances and reproductive success in Camargue stallions. Animal Behaviour, 57, 705–713.Google Scholar
Feh, C. & Demazieres, J. 1993. Grooming at a preferred site reduces heart-rate in horses. Animal Behaviour, 46, 1191–1194.Google Scholar
Feldblum, J.T., Wroblewski, E.E., Rudicell, R.S., et al. 2014. Sexually coercive male chimpanzees sire more offspring. Current Biology, 24, 2855–2860.Google Scholar
Ferreira, C.E.L., Goncalves, J.E.A., Coutinho, R. & Peret, A.C. 1998. Herbivory by the dusky damselfish Stegastes fuscus (Cuvier, 1830) in a tropical rocky shore: effects on the benthic community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 229, 241–264.Google Scholar
Field, J. 1992. Intraspecific parasitism as an alternative reproductive tactic in nest-building wasps and bees. Biological Reviews, 67, 79–126.Google Scholar
Field, J. & Cant, M.A. 2009. Reproductive skew in primitively eusocial wasps: how useful are current models? In Hager, R. & Jones, C.B. (eds), Reproductive Skew in Vertebrates: Proximate and Ultimate Causes, pp. 305–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Field, J. & Leadbeater, E. 2016. Cooperation between non-relatives in a primitively eusocial paper wasp, Polistes dominula. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150093.Google Scholar
Field, J., Solís, C.R., Queller, D.C. & Strassmann, J.E. 1998. Social and genetic structure of paper wasp cofoundress associations: tests of reproductive skew models. The American Naturalist, 151, 545–563.Google Scholar
Field, J., Cronin, A. & Bridge, C. 2006. Future fitness and helping in social queues. Nature, 441, 214–217.Google Scholar
Firman, R.C., Gasparini, C., Manier, M.K. & Pizzari, T. 2017. Postmating female control: 20 years of cryptic female choice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32, 368–382.Google Scholar
Fischer, E.A. 1980. The relationship between mating system and simultaneous hermaphroditism in the coral-reef fish, Hypoplectrus nigricans (Serranidae). Animal Behaviour, 28, 620–633.Google Scholar
Fischer, E.A. 1984. Egg trading in the chalk bass, Serranus torgurarum, a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 66, 143–151.Google Scholar
Fischer, S., Zöttl, M., Groenewoud, F. & Taborsky, B. 2014. Group-size-dependent punishment of idle subordinates in a cooperative breeder where helpers pay to stay. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 281, 20140184.Google Scholar
Fischer, S., Bessert-Nettelbeck, M., Kotrschal, A. & Taborsky, B. 2015. Rearing-group size determines social competence and brain structure in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. American Naturalist, 186, 123–140.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, J.L., Desjardins, J.K., Stiver, K.A., Montgomerie, R. & Balshine, S. 2006. Male reproductive suppression in the cooperatively breeding fish Neolamprologus pulcher. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 25–33.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, J.W. & Bowman, R. 2016. Florida scrub-jays: oversized territories and group defense in a fire-maintained habitat. In Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. (eds), Cooperative Breeding in Vertebrates: Studies of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, pp. 77–96. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, D.J.C. & Ross, K.G. 1985. Regulation of reproduction in eusocial Hymenoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 30, 319–343.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J.A. & Doebeli, M. 2009. A simple and general explanation for the evolution of altruism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276, 13–19.Google Scholar
Flower, T. 2011. Fork-tailed drongos use deceptive mimicked alarm calls to steal food. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278, 1548–1555.Google Scholar
Flower, T.P., Gribble, M. & Ridley, A.R. 2014. Deception by flexible alarm mimicry in an African bird. Science, 344, 513–516.Google Scholar
Foley, A.M., Hewitt, D.G., DeYoung, R.W., et al. 2018. Reproductive effort and success of males in scramble-competition polygyny: evidence for trade-offs between foraging and mate search. Journal of Animal Ecology, 87, 1600–1614.Google Scholar
III Folse, H.J. & Roughgarden, J. 2010. What is an individual organism? A multilevel selection perspective. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 85, 447–472.Google Scholar
Forsgren, E., Karlsson, A. & Kvarnemo, C. 1996. Female sand gobies gain direct benefits by choosing males with eggs in their nests. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 39, 91–96.Google Scholar
Forstmeier, W., Nakagawa, S., Griffith, S.C. & Kempenaers, B. 2014. Female extra-pair mating: adaptation or genetic constraint? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 456–464.Google Scholar
Forsyth, A. & Alcock, J. 1990. Female mimicry and resource defense polygyny by males of a tropical rove beetle, Leistotrophus versicolor (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26, 325–330.Google Scholar
Foster, E.A., Franks, D.W., Mazzi, S., et al. 2012. Adaptive prolonged postreproductive life span in killer whales. Science, 337, 1313.Google Scholar
Foster, E.G., Ritz, D.A., Osborn, J.E. & Swadling, K.M. 2001. Schooling affects the feeding success of Australian salmon (Arripis trutta) when preying on mysid swarms (Paramesopodopsis rufa). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 261, 93–106.Google Scholar
Foster, K.R. 2004. Diminishing returns in social evolution: the not-so-tragic commons. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17, 1058–1072.Google Scholar
Foster, K.R. & Wenseleers, T. 2006. A general model for the evolution of mutualisms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19, 1283–1293.Google Scholar
Foster, K.R., Wenseleers, T. & Ratnieks, F.L. 2006. Kin selection is the key to altruism. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 57-60.Google Scholar
Foster, M.S. 1977. Odd couples in manakins: a study of social organization and cooperative breeding in Chiroxiphia linearis. The American Naturalist, 111.Google Scholar
Foster, M.S. 1981. Cooperative behavior and social organization of the swallow-tailed manakin (Chiroxiphia caudata). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 9, 167–177.Google Scholar
Foster, N.L. & Briffa, M. 2014. Familial strife on the seashore: aggression increases with relatedness in the sea anemone Actinia equina. Behavioural Processes, 103, 243–245.Google Scholar
Foster, W.A. & Treherne, J.E. 1981. Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature, 293, 466–467.Google Scholar
Fowler, A.C. 2005. Fine-scale spatial structuring in cackling Canada geese related to reproductive performance and breeding philopatry. Animal Behaviour, 69, 973–981.Google Scholar
Fowler, J.H. 2005. Altruistic punishment and the origin of cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 7047–7049.Google Scholar
Fowler, J.H. & Christakis, N.A. 2010. Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 5334–5338.Google Scholar
Francisco, M.R., Gibbs, H.L. & Galetti, P.M. Jr. 2009. Patterns of individual relatedness at blue manakin (Chiroxiphia caudata) leks. Auk, 126, 47–53.Google Scholar
Francke-Grosmann, H. 1967. Ectosymbiosis in wood-inhabiting insects. In Henry, M.S. (ed.), Symbiosis: Associations of Invertebrates, Birds, Ruminants, and Other Biota, pp. 141–205. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Frank, R.E. & Silk, J.B. 2009a. Grooming exchange between mothers and non-mothers: the price of natal attraction in wild baboons (Papio anubis). Behaviour, 146, 889–906.Google Scholar
Frank, R.E. & Silk, J.B. 2009b. Impatient traders or contingent reciprocators? Evidence for the extended time-course of grooming exchanges in baboons. Behaviour, 146, 1123–1135.Google Scholar
Frank, S.A. 1993. Coevolutionary genetics of plants and pathogens. Evolutionary Ecology, 7, 45–75.Google Scholar
Frank, S.A. 1994. Genetics of mutualism: the evolution of altruism between species. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 170, 393–400.Google Scholar
Frank, S.A. 1995. Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups. Nature, 377, 520–522.Google Scholar
Frank, S.A. 1998. Foundations of Social Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, S.A. 2003. Repression of competition and the evolution of cooperation. Evolution, 57, 693–705.Google Scholar
Frank, S.A. 2013. Natural selection. VII. History and interpretation of kin selection theory. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26, 1151–1184.Google Scholar
Franks, N.R. 1986. Teams in social insects – group retrieval of prey by army ants (Eciton burchelli, Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 18, 425–429.Google Scholar
Fraser, O.N. & Bugnyar, T. 2012. Reciprocity of agonistic support in ravens. Animal Behaviour, 83, 171–177.Google Scholar
Fraser, S.A., Wisenden, B.D. & Keenleyside, M.H.A. 1993. Aggressive behaviour among convict cichlid (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum) fry of different sizes and its importance to brood adoption. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 71, 2358–2362.Google Scholar
Freidin, E., Carballo, F. & Bentosela, M. 2017. Direct reciprocity in animals: the roles of bonding and affective processes. International Journal of Psychology, 52, 163–170.Google Scholar
French, B.W. & Cade, W.H. 1989. Sexual selection at varying population densities in male field crickets, Gryllus veletis and G. pennsylvanicus. Journal of Insect Behavior, 2, 105–121.Google Scholar
Fretwell, S.D. 1972[2020]. Populations in a Seasonal Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fretwell, S.D. & Lucas, H.L. 1970. On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheoretica, 19, 16–36.Google Scholar
Frommen, J.G. & Bakker, T.C. 2006. Inbreeding avoidance through non-random mating in sticklebacks. Biology Letters, 2, 232–235.Google Scholar
Frommen, J.G., Luz, C. & Bakker, T.C. 2007. Kin discrimination in sticklebacks is mediated by social learning rather than innate recognition. Ethology, 113, 276–282.Google Scholar
Fruteau, C., Voelkl, B., van Damme, E. & Noe, R. 2009. Supply and demand determine the market value of food providers in wild vervet monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 12007–12012.Google Scholar
Fruteau, C., Lemoine, S., Hellard, E., van Damme, E. & Noe, R. 2011a. When females trade grooming for grooming: testing partner control and partner choice models of cooperation in two primate species. Animal Behaviour, 81, 1223–1230.Google Scholar
Fruteau, C., van de Waal, E., van Damme, E. & Noe, R. 2011b. Infant access and handling in sooty mangabeys and vervet monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 81, 153–161.Google Scholar
Fu, F., Nowak, M.A. & Hauert, C. 2010. Invasion and expansion of cooperators in lattice populations: prisoner’s dilemma vs. snowdrift games. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 266, 358–366.Google Scholar
Furrer, R.D. & Manser, M.B. 2009. The evolution of urgency-based and functionally referential alarm calls in ground-dwelling species. The American Naturalist, 173, 400–410.Google Scholar
Gadagkar, R. 1997. Survival Strategies: Cooperation and Conflict in Animal Societies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gadagkar, R. 2001. The Social Biology of Ropalidia marginata: Toward Understanding the Evolution of Eusociality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gadagkar, R. 2016. Evolution of social behaviour in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata: do we need to look beyond kin selection? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150094.Google Scholar
Gadgil, M. 1975. Evolution of social-behavior through interpopulation selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 72, 1199–1201.Google Scholar
Galliard, J.L., Ferrière, , & Clobert, J. 2003. Mother–offspring interactions affect natal dispersal in a lizard. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270, 1163–1169.Google Scholar
Gaillard, J.M., Festa-Bianchet, M., Delorme, D. & Jorgenson, J. 2000. Body mass and individual fitness in female ungulates: bigger is not always better. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 267, 471–477.Google Scholar
Galef, B.G. Jr & Giraldeau, L.A. 2001. Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions. Animal Behaviour, 61, 3–15.Google Scholar
Gamboa, G.J., Wacker, T.L., Scope, J.A., Cornell, T.J. & Shellmanreeve, J. 1990. The mechanism of queen regulation of foraging by workers in paper wasps (Polistes fuscatus, Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Ethology, 85, 335–343.Google Scholar
Gandon, S. & Rousset, F. 1999. Evolution of stepping-stone dispersal rates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 266, 2507–2513.Google Scholar
Garay, J. 2009. Cooperation in defence against a predator. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 257, 45–51.Google Scholar
Garcia, R.A., Cabeza, M., Rahbek, C. & Araújo, M.B. 2014. Multiple dimensions of climate change and their implications for biodiversity. Science, 344, 1247579.Google Scholar
Gardner, A. 2010. Sex-biased dispersal of adults mediates the evolution of altruism among juveniles. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 262, 339–345.Google Scholar
Gardner, A. & Grafen, A. 2009. Capturing the superorganism: a formal theory of group adaptation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22, 659–671.Google Scholar
Gardner, A. & West, S.A. 2004. Cooperation and punishment, especially in humans. The American Naturalist, 164, 753–764.Google Scholar
Gardner, A. & West, S.A. 2006. Demography, altruism, and the benefits of budding. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19, 1707–1716.Google Scholar
Gardner, A., West, S.A. & Buckling, A. 2004. Bacteriocins, spite and virulence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 271, 1529–1535.Google Scholar
Gardner, A., West, S. & Barton, N. 2007. The relation between multilocus population genetics and social evolution theory. The American Naturalist, 169, 207–226.Google Scholar
Gardner, A., West, S. & Wild, G. 2011. The genetical theory of kin selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24, 1020–1043.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, M.R. & Skaperdas, S. 2007. Economics of conflict: an overview. Handbook of Defense Economics, 2, 649–709.Google Scholar
Garroway, C.J., Radersma, R., Sepil, I., et al. 2013. Fine-scale genetic structure in a wild bird population: the role of limited dispersal and environmentally based selection as causal factors. Evolution, 67, 3488–3500.Google Scholar
Garza, J.C., Dallas, J., Duryadi, D., et al. 1997. Social structure of the mound-building mouse Mus spicilegus revealed by genetic analysis with microsatellites. Molecular Ecology, 6, 1009–1017.Google Scholar
Gaspari, S., Azzellino, A., Airoldi, S. & Hoelzel, A.R. 2007. Social kin associations and genetic structuring of striped dolphin populations (Stenella coeruleoalba) in the Mediterranean Sea. Molecular Ecology, 16, 2922–2933.Google Scholar
Gasparini, C. & Pilastro, A. 2011. Cryptic female preference for genetically unrelated males is mediated by ovarian fluid in the guppy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278, 2495–2501.Google Scholar
Gaston, A.J. 1978. The evolution of group territorial behavior and cooperative breeding. The American Naturalist, 112, 1091–1100.Google Scholar
Gautrais, J., Jost, C., Soria, M., et al. 2009. Analyzing fish movement as a persistent turning walker. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 58, 429–445.Google Scholar
Gavrilets, S. 2012. On the evolutionary origins of the egalitarian syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 14069–14074.Google Scholar
Gavrilets, S. & Fortunato, L. 2014. A solution to the collective action problem in between-group conflict with within-group inequality. Nature Communications, 5, 3526.Google Scholar
Gazda, S.K., Connor, R.C., Edgar, R.K. & Cox, F. 2005. A division of labour with role specialization in group-hunting bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) off Cedar Key, Florida. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272, 135–140.Google Scholar
Gerber, N., Schweinfurth, M.K. & Taborsky, M. 2020. The smell of cooperation: rats increase helpful behaviour when receiving odour cues of a conspecific performing a cooperative task. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 287, 20202327.Google Scholar
Gerlach, G. & Lysiak, N. 2006. Kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance in zebrafish, Danio rerio, is based on phenotype matching. Animal Behaviour, 71, 1371–1377.Google Scholar
Gfrerer, N. 2017. Cooperation, social competence and working ability in Swiss military dogs. PhD thesis, University of Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Gfrerer, N. & Taborsky, M. 2017. Working dogs cooperate among one another by generalised reciprocity. Scientific Reports, 7, 43867.Google Scholar
Gfrerer, N. & Taborsky, M. 2018. Working dogs transfer different tasks in reciprocal cooperation. Biology Letters, 14, 20170460.Google Scholar
Ghoul, M., Griffin, A.S. & West, S.A. 2014. Toward an evolutionary definition of cheating. Evolution, 68, 318–331.Google Scholar
Gibbs, H.L., Goldizen, A.W., Bullough, C. & Goldizen, A.R. 1994. Parentage analysis of multi-male social groups of Tasmanian native hens (Tribonyx mortierii): genetic evidence for monogamy and polyandry. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 35, 363–371.Google Scholar
Gibson, R.M., Pires, D., Delaney, K.S. & Wayne, R.K. 2005. Microsatellite DNA analysis shows that greater sage grouse leks are not kin groups. Molecular Ecology, 14, 4453–4459.Google Scholar
Gilbert, C., McCafferty, D., Le Maho, Y., et al. 2010. One for all and all for one: the energetic benefits of huddling in endotherms. Biological Reviews, 85, 545–569.Google Scholar
Gilbert, W.M., Nolan, P.M., Stoehr, A.M. & Hill, G.E. 2005. Filial cannibalism at a house finch nest. The Wilson Bulletin, 117, 413–415.Google Scholar
Gilby, I.C. 2006. Meat sharing among the Gombe chimpanzees: harassment and reciprocal exchange. Animal Behaviour, 71, 953–963.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, J.S. 2004. Pup escorting in the communal breeding banded mongoose: behavior, benefits, and maintenance. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 952–960.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, J.S. 2008. Aggressive monopolization of mobile carers by young of a cooperative breeder. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2491–2498.Google Scholar
Gill, F.B. & Wolf, L.L. 1975. Economics of feeding territoriality in golden-winged sunbird. Ecology, 56, 333–345.Google Scholar
Gill, S.A. 2012. Strategic use of allopreening in family-living wrens. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66, 757–763.Google Scholar
Gillespie, J.H. 1977. Natural selection for variances in offspring numbers: a new evolutionary principle. The American Naturalist, 111, 1010–1014.Google Scholar
Ginther, A.J. & Snowdon, C.T. 2009. Expectant parents groom adult sons according to previous alloparenting in a biparental cooperatively breeding primate. Animal Behaviour, 78, 287–297.Google Scholar
Giorgi, M.S., Arlettaz, R., Christe, P. & Vogel, P. 2001. The energetic grooming costs imposed by a parasitic mite (Spinturnix myoti) upon its bat host (Myotis myotis). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268, 2071–2075.Google Scholar
Giraldeau, L.A. 1988. The stable group and the determinants of foraging group size. In Slobodchikoff, C.N. (ed.), The Ecology of Social Behavior, pp. 33–53. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Girman, D.J., Mills, M.G.L., Geffen, E. & Wayne, R.K. 1997. A molecular genetic analysis of social structure, dispersal, and interpack relationships of the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 187–198.Google Scholar
Giron, D., Dunn, D.W., Hardy, I.C. & Strand, M.R. 2004. Aggression by polyembryonic wasp soldiers correlates with kinship but not resource competition. Nature, 430, 676.Google Scholar
Glonekova, M., Brandlova, K. & Pluhacek, J. 2016. Stealing milk by young and reciprocal mothers: high incidence of allonursing in giraffes, Giraffa camelopardalis. Animal Behaviour, 113, 113–123.Google Scholar
Godfray, H.C. 1995. Evolutionary theory of parent–offspring conflict. Nature, 376, 133.Google Scholar
Godin, J.G. & Keenleyside, M.H. 1984. Foraging on patchily distributed prey by a cichlid fish (Teleostei, Cichlidae): a test of the ideal free distribution theory. Animal Behaviour, 32, 120–131.Google Scholar
Goldberg, J.L., Grant, J.W. & Lefebvre, L. 2001. Effects of the temporal predictability and spatial clumping of food on the intensity of competitive aggression in the Zenaida dove. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 490–495.Google Scholar
Goldizen, A.W., Putland, D.A. & Goldizen, A.R. 1998a. Variable mating patterns in Tasmanian native hens (Gallinula mortierii): correlates of reproductive success. Journal of Animal Ecology, 67, 307–317.Google Scholar
Goldizen, A.W., Goldizen, A.R., Putland, D.A., et al. 1998b. ‘Wife-sharing’ in the Tasmanian native hen (Gallinula mortierii): is it caused by a male-biased sex ratio? The Auk, 115, 528–532.Google Scholar
Goldizen, A.W., Buchan, J.C., Putland, D.A., Goldizen, A.R. & Krebs, E.A. 2000. Patterns of mate-sharing in a population of Tasmanian native hens Gallinula mortierii. Ibis, 142, 40–47.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, T.G., Bakker, T.C. & Feuth-de Bruijn, E. 1993. Selective copying in mate choice of female sticklebacks. Animal Behaviour, 45, 547.Google Scholar
Gomes, C.M. & Boesch, C. 2009. Wild chimpanzees exchange meat for sex on a long-term basis. PLoS One, 4(4), e5116.Google Scholar
Gomes, C.M. & Boesch, C. 2011. Reciprocity and trades in wild West African chimpanzees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 2183–2196.Google Scholar
Gomes, C.M., Mundry, R. & Boesch, C. 2009. Long-term reciprocation of grooming in wild West African chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 699–706.Google Scholar
Gomez-Gardenes, J., Campillo, M., Floria, L. & Moreno, Y. 2007. Dynamical organization of cooperation in complex topologies. Physical Review Letters, 98, 108103.Google Scholar
Goodale, E., Beauchamp, G., Magrath, R.D., Nieh, J.C. & Ruxton, G.D. 2010. Interspecific information transfer influences animal community structure. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 354–361.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. 1986. The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Goodnight, C. 2013a. On multilevel selection and kin selection: contextual analysis meets direct fitness. Evolution, 67, 1539–1548.Google Scholar
Goodnight, C.J. 2013b. Defining the individual. In Bouchad, F. & Huneman, P. (eds), From Groups to Individuals – Evolution and Emerging Individuality, pp. 37–53. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goodnight, C.J. & Stevens, L. 1997. Experimental studies of group selection: what do they tell us about group selection in nature? American Naturalist, 150, S59–S79.Google Scholar
Gore, J., Youk, H. & van Oudenaarden, A. 2009. Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast. Nature, 459, 253–256.Google Scholar
Gorrell, J.C., McAdam, A.G., Coltman, D.W., Humphries, M.M. & Boutin, S. 2010. Adopting kin enhances inclusive fitness in asocial red squirrels. Nature Communications, 1, 22.Google Scholar
Grafen, A. 1979. The hawk–dove game played between relatives. Animal Behaviour, 27(Part 3), 905–907.Google Scholar
Grafen, A. 1984. Natural selection, kin selection and group selection. Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 2, 62–84.Google Scholar
Grafen, A. 2007. The formal Darwinism project: a mid-term report. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 1243–1254.Google Scholar
Grafen, A. 2009. Formalizing Darwinism and inclusive fitness theory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3135–3141.Google Scholar
Grafen, A. 2014. The formal Darwinism project in outline. Biology & Philosophy, 29, 155–174.Google Scholar
Grant, J.W. 1993. Whether or not to defend? The influence of resource distribution. Marine & Freshwater Behaviour & Physiology, 23, 137–153.Google Scholar
Grant, J.W. & Kramer, D.L. 1992. Temporal clumping of food arrival reduces its monopolization and defence by zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. Animal Behaviour, 44, 101–110.Google Scholar
Grant, J.W. & Noakes, D.L. 1988. Aggressiveness and foraging mode of young-of-the-year brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis (Pisces, Salmonidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 22, 435–445.Google Scholar
Grant, J.W.A., Girard, I.L., Breau, C. & Weir, L.K. 2002. Influence of food abundance on competitive aggression in juvenile convict cichlids. Animal Behaviour, 63, 323–330.Google Scholar
Grantner, A. & Taborsky, M. 1998. The metabolic rates associated with resting, and with the performance of agonistic, submissive and digging behaviours in the cichlid fish Neolamprologus pulcher (Pisces: Cichlidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 168, 427–433.Google Scholar
Grasmuck, V. & Desor, D. 2002. Behavioural differentiation of rats confronted to a complex diving-for-food situation. Behavioural Processes, 58, 67–77.Google Scholar
Gray, K., Ward, A.F. & Norton, M.I. 2014. Paying it forward: generalized reciprocity and the limits of generosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology – General, 143, 247–254.Google Scholar
Green, J.P. & Hatchwell, B. 2018. Inclusive fitness consequences of dispersal decisions in a cooperatively breeding bird, the long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 12011–12016.Google Scholar
Green, J.P., Cant, M.A. & Field, J. 2014. Using social parasitism to test reproductive skew models in a primitively eusocial wasp. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 281, 20141206.Google Scholar
Green, J.P., Freckleton, R.P. & Hatchwell, B.J. 2016. Variation in helper effort among cooperatively breeding bird species is consistent with Hamilton’s Rule. Nature Communications, 7, 12663.Google Scholar
Green, P.A. & Patek, S.N. 2018. Mutual assessment during ritualized fighting in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 285, 20172542.Google Scholar
Green, P.A., McHenry, M.J. and Patek, S.N., 2019. Context-dependent scaling of kinematics and energetics during contests and feeding in mantis shrimp. Journal of Experimental Biology, 222(7).Google Scholar
Greenwood, P.J. 1980. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Animal Behaviour, 28, 1140–1162.Google Scholar
Greiner, B. & Levati, M.V. 2005. Indirect reciprocity in cyclical networks – an experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 711–731.Google Scholar
Grether, G.F., Losin, N., Anderson, C.N. & Okamoto, K. 2009. The role of interspecific interference competition in character displacement and the evolution of competitor recognition. Biological Reviews, 84, 617–635.Google Scholar
Grether, G.F., Anderson, C.N., Drury, J.P., et al. 2013. The evolutionary consequences of interspecific aggression. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1289, 48–68.Google Scholar
Griesser, M. 2003. Nepotistic vigilance behavior in Siberian jay parents. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 246–250.Google Scholar
Griesser, M. & Ekman, J. 2004. Nepotistic alarm calling in the Siberian jay, Perisoreus infaustus. Animal Behaviour, 67, 933–939.Google Scholar
Griesser, M. & Ekman, J. 2005. Nepotistic mobbing behaviour in the Siberian jay, Perisoreus infaustus. Animal Behaviour, 69, 345–352.Google Scholar
Griesser, M., Nystrand, M. & Ekman, J. 2006. Reduced mortality selects for family cohesion in a social species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1881–1886.Google Scholar
Griesser, M., Drobniak, S.M., Nakagawa, S. & Botero, C.A. 2017. Family living sets the stage for cooperative breeding and ecological resilience in birds. PLoS Biology, 15, e2000483.Google Scholar
Griffin, A.S. & West, S.A. 2002. Kin selection: fact and fiction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 15–21.Google Scholar
Griffin, A.S. & West, S.A. 2003. Kin discrimination and the benefit of helping in cooperatively breeding vertebrates. Science, 302, 634–636.Google Scholar
Griffin, A.S., West, S.A. & Buckling, A. 2004. Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria. Nature, 430, 1024–1027.Google Scholar
Griffith, S.C., Owens, I.P. & Thuman, K.A. 2002. Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2195–2212.Google Scholar
Grinsted, L. & Field, J. 2017. Market forces influence helping behaviour in cooperatively breeding paper wasps. Nature Communications, 8.Google Scholar
Grinsted, L. & Field, J. 2018. Predictors of nest growth: diminishing returns for subordinates in the paper wasp Polistes dominula. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 72, 88.Google Scholar
Groenewoud, F., Frommen, J.G., Josi, D., et al. 2016. Predation risk drives social complexity in cooperative breeders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 4104–4109.Google Scholar
Groenewoud, F., Kingma, S.A., Hammers, M., et al. 2018. Subordinate females in the cooperatively breeding Seychelles warbler obtain direct benefits by joining unrelated groups. Journal of Animal Ecology, 87, 1251–1263.Google Scholar
Groom, M.J. 1992. Sand-colored nighthawks parasitize the antipredator behavior of three nesting bird species. Ecology, 73, 785–793.Google Scholar
Groothuis, T.G. & Kraak, S.B. 1994. Female preference for nests with eggs is based on the presence of the eggs themselves. Behaviour, 131, 189–206.Google Scholar
Gross, M.R. 1996. Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 92–98.Google Scholar
Gröning, J. & Hochkirch, A. 2008. Reproductive interference between animal species. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 83, 257–282.Google Scholar
Gruber-Vodicka, H.R., Dirks, U., Leisch, N., et al. 2011. Paracatenula, an ancient symbiosis between thiotrophic Alphaproteobacteria and catenulid flatworms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 12078–12083.Google Scholar
Grüter, C. & Taborsky, B. 2005. Sex ratio and the sexual conflict about brood care in a biparental mouthbrooder. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 58, 44–52.Google Scholar
Gumert, M.D. 2007. Payment for sex in a macaque mating market. Animal Behaviour, 74, 1655–1667.Google Scholar
Gumert, M.D. & Ho, M.H. 2008. The trade balance of grooming and its coordination of reciprocation and tolerance in Indonesian long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Primates, 49, 176–185.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, G.S. & Steingrimsson, S.O. 2011. Contrasting patterns of territoriality and foraging mode in two stream-dwelling salmonids, Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) and brown trout (Salmo trutta). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 68, 2090–2100.Google Scholar
Gurven, M. & Kaplan, H. 2007. Longevity among hunter-gatherers: a cross-cultural examination. Population and Development Review, 33, 321–365.Google Scholar
Gurven, M. & Walker, R. 2006. Energetic demand of multiple dependents and the evolution of slow human growth. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273, 835–841.Google Scholar
Hack, M.A. 1997. Assessment strategies in the contests of male crickets, Acheta domesticus (L.). Animal Behaviour, 53, 733–747.Google Scholar
Hadfield, J.D., Richardson, D.S. & Burke, T. 2006. Towards unbiased parentage assignment: combining genetic, behavioural and spatial data in a Bayesian framework. Molecular Ecology, 15, 3715–3730.Google Scholar
Haemig, P.D. 2001. Symbiotic nesting of birds with formidable animals: a review with applications to biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity & Conservation, 10, 527–540.Google Scholar
Hager, R. & Jones, C.B. 2009. Reproductive Skew in Vertebrates. Proximate and Ultimate Causes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haig, D. 1993. Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy. Quarterly Review of Biology, 68, 495–532.Google Scholar
Haig, D. 2014. Genetic dissent and individual compromise. Biology & Philosophy, 29, 233-239.Google Scholar
Haig, D. 2015. Maternal–fetal conflict, genomic imprinting and mammalian vulnerabilities to cancer. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 370, 20140178.Google Scholar
Haig, D. & Grafen, A. 1991. Genetic scrambling as a defence against meiotic drive. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 153, 531–558.Google Scholar
Haig, D. & Wilkins, J.F. 2000. Genomic imprinting, sibling solidarity and the logic of collective action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 355, 1593–1597.Google Scholar
Halling, L.A., Oldroyd, B.P., Wattanachaiyingcharoen, W., et al. 2001. Worker policing in the bee Apis florea. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 49, 509–513.Google Scholar
Halliwell, B., Uller, T., Wapstra, E. & While, G.M. 2017. Resource distribution mediates social and mating behavior in a family living lizard. Behavioral Ecology, 28, 145–153.Google Scholar
Halpin, Z.T. 1991. Kin recognition cues of vertebrates. In Hepper, P.G. (ed.), Kin Recognition, pp. 220–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamel, S., Gaillard, J.M., Festa-Bianchet, M. & Côté, S.D. 2009a. Individual quality, early-life conditions, and reproductive success in contrasted populations of large herbivores. Ecology, 90, 1981–1995.Google Scholar
Hamel, S., Côté, S.D., Gaillard, J.M. & Festa-Bianchet, M. 2009b. Individual variation in reproductive costs of reproduction: high-quality females always do better. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78, 143–151.Google Scholar
Hamilton, I.M. & Dill, L.M. 2002. Monopolization of food by zebrafish (Danio rerio) increases in risky habitats. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80, 2164–2169.Google Scholar
Hamilton, I. & Heg, D. 2008. Sex differences in the effect of social status on the growth of subordinates in a co-operatively breeding cichlid. Journal of Fish Biology, 72, 1079–1088.Google Scholar
Hamilton, I.M. & Ligocki, I.Y. 2012. The extended personality: indirect effects of behavioural syndromes on the behaviour of others in a group-living cichlid. Animal Behaviour, 84, 659–664.Google Scholar
Hamilton, I.M. & Taborsky, M. 2005a. Contingent movement and cooperation evolve under generalized reciprocity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272, 2259–2267.Google Scholar
Hamilton, I.M. & Taborsky, M. 2005b. Unrelated helpers will not fully compensate for costs imposed on breeders when they pay to stay. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272, 445–454.Google Scholar
Hamilton, I.M., Heg, D. & Bender, N. 2005. Size differences within a dominance hierarchy influence conflict and help in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Behaviour, 142, 1591–1613.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. 1963. The evolution of altruistic behavior. The American Naturalist, 97, 354–356.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 17–52.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. 1970. Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature, 228, 1218–1220.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. 1971. Geometry for the selfish herd. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 31, 295–311.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. 1972. Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 3, 193–232.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. 1975. Innate social aptitudes of man: an approach from evolutionary genetics. Biosocial Anthropology, 53, 133–155.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. 1979. Wingless and fighting males in fig wasps and other insects. In Blum, M.S. & Blum, N.A. (eds), Reproductive Competition, Mate Choice, and Sexual Selection in Insects, pp. 167–220. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Hammers, M., Kingma, S.A., Spurgin, L.G., et al. 2019. Breeders that receive help age more slowly in a cooperatively breeding bird. Nature Communications, 10, 1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerstein, P. 1981. The role of asymmetries in animal contests. Animal Behaviour, 29, 193–205.Google Scholar
Hammerstein, P. 2003. Why is reciprocity so rare in social animals? A protestant appeal. In Hammerstein, P. (ed.), Dahlem Workshop Report. Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation, pp. 83–93. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerstein, P. & Noe, R. 2016. Biological trade and markets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 371.Google Scholar
Hammerstein, P. & Parker, G.A. 1982. The asymmetric war of attrition. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 96, 647–682.Google Scholar
Handegard, N.O., Boswell, K.M., Ioannou, C.C., et al. 2012. The dynamics of coordinated group hunting and collective information transfer among schooling prey. Current Biology, 22, 1213–1217.Google Scholar
Hankinson, T.L. 1920. Report on investigations of the fish of the Galien River, Berrien County, Michigan. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 89, 1–14.Google Scholar
Hannon, S.J., Mumme, R.L., Koenig, W.D. & Pitelka, F.A. 1985. Replacement of breeders and within-group conflict in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 17, 303–312.Google Scholar
Hanwell, A. & Peaker, M. 1977. Physiological effects of lactation on the mother. In Comparative Aspects of Lactation, Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 41, 297–312. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harcourt, J.L., Sweetman, G., Manica, A. & Johnstone, R.A. 2010. Pairs of fish resolve conflicts over coordinated movement by taking turns. Current Biology, 20, 156–160.Google Scholar
Hardy, I.C., Goubault, M. & Batchelor, T.P. 2013. Hymenopteran contests and agonistic behaviour. In Hardy, I.C.W. & Briffa, M. (eds), Animal Contests, p. 147. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hario, M., Koljonen, M.L. & Rintala, J. 2012. Kin structure and choice of brood care in a common eider (Somateria m. mollissima) population. Journal of Ornithology, 153, 963–973.Google Scholar
Harris, A.C. & Madden, G.J. 2002. Delay discounting and performance on the prisoner’s dilemma game. Psychological Record, 52, 429–40.Google Scholar
Harris, J.A., Campbell, K.G. & Wright, G.M. 1976. Ecological studies on the horizontal borer ‘Austroplatypus incompertus’ (Schedl) (Coleoptera: Platypodidae). Journal of the Entomological Society of Australia (NSW), 9, 11–21.Google Scholar
Harrison, F., Barta, Z., Cuthill, I. & Szekely, T. 2009. How is sexual conflict over parental care resolved? A meta analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22, 1800–1812.Google Scholar
Harrisson, K.A., Pavlova, A., Amos, J.N., et al. 2013. Disrupted fine-scale population processes in fragmented landscapes despite large-scale genetic connectivity for a widespread and common cooperative breeder: the superb fairy-wren (Malurus cyaneus). Journal of Animal Ecology, 82, 322–333.Google Scholar
Hart, B.L. & Hart, L.A. 1992. Reciprocal allogrooming in impala, Aepyceros melampus. Animal Behaviour, 44, 1073–1083.Google Scholar
Hart, B.L., Hart, L.A., Mooring, M.S. & Olubayo, R. 1992. Biological basis of grooming behavior in antelope – the body-size, vigilance and habitat principles. Animal Behaviour, 44, 615–631.Google Scholar
Hart, D.D. 1987. Feeding territoriality in aquatic insects – cost–benefit models and experimental tests. American Zoologist, 27, 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, M.K., Kratter, A.W. & Crowley, P.H. 2016. Partner fidelity and reciprocal investments in the mating system of a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Behavioral Ecology, 27, 1471–1479.Google Scholar
Harten, L., Prat, Y., Ben Cohen, S., Dor, R. & Yovel, Y. 2019. Food for sex in bats revealed as producer males reproduce with scrounging females. Current Biology, 29, 1895–1900.Google Scholar
Hartley, I.R., Davies, N.B., Hatchwell, B.J., et al. 1995. The polygynandrous mating system of the alpine accentor, Prunella collaris. II. Multiple paternity and parental effort. Animal Behaviour, 49, 789–803.Google Scholar
Harts, A.M. & Kokko, H. 2013. Understanding promiscuity: when is seeking additional mates better than guarding an already found one? Evolution, 67, 2838–2848.Google Scholar
Hatchwell, B.J. 1999. Investment strategies of breeders in avian cooperative breeding systems. American Naturalist, 154, 205–219.Google Scholar
Hatchwell, B.J. 2009. The evolution of cooperative breeding in birds: kinship, dispersal and life history. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3217–3227.Google Scholar
Hatchwell, B.J. & Komdeur, J. 2000. Ecological constraints, life history traits and the evolution of cooperative breeding. Animal Behaviour, 59, 1079–1086.Google Scholar
Hatchwell, B.J., Ross, D.J., Fowlie, M.K. & McGowan, A. 2001. Kin discrimination in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268, 885–890.Google Scholar
Hatchwell, B.J., Ross, D.J., Chaline, N., Fowlie, M.K. & Burke, T. 2002. Parentage in the cooperative breeding system of long-tailed tits, Aegithalos caudatus. Animal Behaviour, 64, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatchwell, B.J., Russell, A.F., MacColl, A.D., et al. 2004. Helpers increase long-term but not short-term productivity in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 1–10.Google Scholar
Hattori, Y., Kuroshima, H. & Fujita, K. 2005. Cooperative problem solving by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): spontaneous division of labor, communication, and reciprocal altruism. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119, 335–342.Google Scholar
Hauert, C., Michor, F., Nowak, M.A. & Doebeli, M. 2006. Synergy and discounting of cooperation in social dilemmas. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 239, 195–202.Google Scholar
Haunhorst, C.B., Schülke, O. & Ostner, J. 2016. Opposite-sex social bonding in wild Assamese macaques. American Journal of Primatology, 78, 872–882.Google Scholar
Hauser, M.D., Teixidor, P., Field, L. & Flaherty, R. 1993. Food-elicited cells in chimpanzees: effects of food quantity and divisibility. Animal Behaviour, 45, 817–819.Google Scholar
Hauser, M.D., Chen, M.K., Chen, F., Chuang, E. & Chuang, E. 2003. Give unto others: genetically unrelated cotton-top tamarin monkeys preferentially give food to those who altruistically give food back. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270, 2363–2370.Google Scholar
Hawlena, H., Bashary, D., Abramsky, Z. & Krasnov, B.R. 2007. Benefits, costs and constraints of anti-parasitic grooming in adult and juvenile rodents. Ethology, 113, 394–402.Google Scholar
Hayden, B.Y. 2016. Time discounting and time preference in animals: a critical review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 39–53.Google Scholar
Haydock, J., Koenig, W.D. & Stanback, M.T. 2001. Shared parentage and incest avoidance in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker. Molecular Ecology, 10, 1515–1525.Google Scholar
Hector, D.P. 1986. Cooperative hunting and its relationship to foraging success and prey size in an avian predator. Ethology, 73, 247–257.Google Scholar
Heg, D. 2008. Reproductive suppression in female cooperatively breeding cichlids. Biology Letters, 4, 606–609.Google Scholar
Heg, D. 2010. Status-dependent and strategic growth adjustments in female cooperative cichlids. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64, 1309–1316.Google Scholar
Heg, D. & Hamilton, I.M. 2008. Tug-of-war over reproduction in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 1249–1257.Google Scholar
Heg, D. & Taborsky, M. 2010. Helper response to experimentally manipulated predation risk in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher. PLoS One, 5, e10784.Google Scholar
Heg, D., Bachar, Z., Brouwer, L. & Taborsky, M. 2004a. Predation risk is an ecological constraint for helper dispersal in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 271, 2367–2374.Google Scholar
Heg, D., Bender, N. & Hamilton, I. 2004b. Strategic growth decisions in helper cichlids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 271, S505–S508.Google Scholar
Heg, D., Brouwer, L., Bachar, Z. & Taborsky, M. 2005a. Large group size yields group stability in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher. Behaviour, 142, 1615–1641.Google Scholar
Heg, D., Bachar, Z. & Taborsky, M. 2005b. Cooperative breeding and group structure in the Lake Tanganyika cichlid Neolamprologus savoryi. Ethology, 111, 1017–1043.Google Scholar
Heg, D., Bergmuller, R., Bonfils, D., et al. 2006. Cichlids do not adjust reproductive skew to the availability of independent breeding options. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 419–429.Google Scholar
Heg, D., Heg-Bachar, Z., Brouwer, L. & Taborsky, M. 2008a. Experimentally induced helper dispersal in colonially breeding cooperative cichlids. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 83, 191–206.Google Scholar
Heg, D., Jutzeler, E., Bonfils, D. & Mitchell, J.S. 2008b. Group composition affects male reproductive partitioning in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Molecular Ecology, 17, 4359–4370.Google Scholar
Heg, D., Jutzeler, E., Mitchell, J.S. & Hamilton, I.M. 2009. Helpful female subordinate cichlids are more likely to reproduce. PLoS One, 4, e5458.Google Scholar
Heg, D., Rothenberger, S. & Schuerch, R. 2011. Habitat saturation, benefits of philopatry, relatedness, and the extent of co-operative breeding in a cichlid. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 82–92.Google Scholar
Heg, D., Josi, D., Takeyama, T., et al. (submitted). Age- and sex-dependent relatedness explains reproductive skew, territory inheritance and workload in highly social cichlids.Google Scholar
Heinrich, B. 1988. Winter foraging at carcasses by three sympatric corvids, with emphasis on recruitment by the raven, Corvus corax. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 23, 141–156.Google Scholar
Heinsohn, R.G. 1991. Kidnapping and reciprocity in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs. Animal Behaviour, 41, 1097–1100.Google Scholar
Heinsohn, R.G. 2004. Parental care, load-lightening, and costs. In Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. (eds), Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, pp. 67–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heinsohn, R. & Legge, S. 1999. The cost of helping. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 53–57.Google Scholar
Heinsohn, R., Dunn, P., Legge, S. & Double, M. 2000. Coalitions of relatives and reproductive skew in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 267, 243–249.Google Scholar
Heitman, T.L., Koski, K.G. & Scott, M.E. 2003. Energy deficiency alters behaviours involved in transmission of Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematoda) in mice. Canadian Journal of Zoology – Revue Canadienne de Zoologie, 81, 1767–1773.Google Scholar
Hellmann, J.K. & Hamilton, I.M. 2018. Dominant and subordinate outside options alter help and eviction in a pay-to-stay negotiation model. Behavioral Ecology, 29, 553–562.Google Scholar
Hellmann, J.K., Ligocki, I.Y., O’Connor, C.M., et al. 2015. Reproductive sharing in relation to group and colony-level attributes in a cooperative breeding fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20150954.Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, C.K. 1990. Models of, and tests for, reciprocity, unidirectionality and other social-interaction patterns at a group level. Animal Behaviour, 39, 1013–1029.Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, C.K. 1994. Support for being groomed in long-tailed macaques, Macaca fascicularis. Animal Behaviour, 48, 479–481.Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, C.K. & Ek, A. 1991. Reciprocity and interchange of grooming and support in captive chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 41, 923–935.Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, C.K. & Luteijn, M. 1998. Philopatry, male presence and grooming reciprocation among female primates: a comparative perspective. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 42, 207–215.Google Scholar
Henter, H.J. 2003. Inbreeding depression and haplodiploidy: experimental measures in a parasitoid and comparisons across diploid and haplodiploid insect taxa. Evolution, 57, 1793–1803.Google Scholar
Henzi, S.P. & Barrett, L. 2002. Infants as a commodity in a baboon market. Animal Behaviour, 63, 915–921.Google Scholar
Henzi, S.P., Lycett, J.E. & Weingrill, T. 1997. Cohort size and the allocation of social effort by female mountain baboons. Animal Behaviour, 54, 1235–1243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hepper, P.G. 1991. Recognizing Kin: Ontogeny and Classification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herberstein, M.E., Painting, C.J. & Holwell, G.I. 2017. Scramble competition polygyny in terrestrial arthropods. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 49, 237–295.Google Scholar
Herbert-Read, J.E., Romanczuk, P., Krause, S., et al. 2016. Proto-cooperation: group hunting sailfish improve hunting success by alternating attacks on grouping prey. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 283, 20161671.Google Scholar
Herbert-Read, J.E., Rosén, E., Szorkovszky, A., et al. 2017. How predation shapes the social interaction rules of shoaling fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 284, 20171126.Google Scholar
Herne, K., Lappalainen, O. & Kestila-Kekkonen, E. 2013. Experimental comparison of direct, general, and indirect reciprocity. Journal of Socio-Economics, 45, 38–46.Google Scholar
Herre, E.A., Knowlton, N., Mueller, U.G. & Rehner, S.A. 1999. The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 49–53.Google Scholar
Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernández-Lloreda, M.V., Hare, B. & Tomasello, M. 2007. Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: the cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science, 317, 1360–1366.Google Scholar
Hershey, A.E. 1987. Tubes and foraging behavior in larval Chironomidae – implications for predator avoidance. Oecologia, 73, 236–241.Google Scholar
Hert, E. 1985. Individual recognition of helpers by the breeders in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi (Poll, 1974). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 68, 313–325.Google Scholar
Heymann, E.W. & Hsia, S.S. 2015. Unlike fellows – a review of primate–non-primate associations. Biological Reviews, 90, 142–156.Google Scholar
Higashi, M. & Yamamura, N. 1993. What determines animal group size? Insider–outsider conflict and its resolution. The American Naturalist, 142, 553–563.Google Scholar
Higginson, D.M., Miller, K.B., Segraves, K.A. & Pitnick, S. 2012. Female reproductive tract form drives the evolution of complex sperm morphology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 4538–4543.Google Scholar
Hilbe, C., Nowak, M.A. & Sigmund, K. 2013. Evolution of extortion in Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 6913–6918.Google Scholar
Hilbe, C., Rohl, T. & Milinski, M. 2014. Extortion subdues human players but is finally punished in the prisoner’s dilemma. Nature Communications, 5, 3976.Google Scholar
Hilbe, C., Hagel, K. & Milinski, M. 2016. Asymmetric power boosts extortion in an economic experiment. PLoS One, 11, e0163867.Google Scholar
Hill, K. & Hurtado, A.M. 1996. Ache Life History: the Ecology and Demography of a Foraging People. New York, NY: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hinde, C.A. & Kilner, R.M. 2007. Negotiations within the family over the supply of parental care. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 53–60.Google Scholar
Hinsch, M. & Komdeur, J. 2010. Defence, intrusion and the evolutionary stability of territoriality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 266, 606–613.Google Scholar
Hinsch, M. & Komdeur, J. 2017. What do territory owners defend against? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 284, 20162356.Google Scholar
Hinsch, M., Pen, I. & Komdeur, J. 2013. Evolution of defense against depletion of local food resources in a mechanistic foraging model. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 245–252.Google Scholar
Hintz, W.D. & Lonzarich, D.G. 2018. Maximizing foraging success: the roles of group size, predation risk, competition, and ontogeny. Ecosphere, 9, e02456.Google Scholar
Hirschenhauser, K., Canario, A.V., Ros, A.F., Taborsky, M. & Oliveira, R.F. 2008. Social context may affect urinary excretion of 11-ketotestosterone in African cichlids. Behaviour, 145, 1367–1388.Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, J. 1989. Conflict and rent-seeking success functions: ratio versus difference models of relative success. Public Choice, 63, 101–112.Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, J. 2001. The Dark Side of the Force: Economic Foundations of Conflict Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoare, D.J., Couzin, I.D., Godin, J.G. & Krause, J. 2004. Context-dependent group size choice in fish. Animal Behaviour, 67, 155–164.Google Scholar
Hochberg, M.E., Rankin, D.J. & Taborsky, M. 2008. The coevolution of cooperation and dispersal in social groups and its implications for the emergence of multicellularity. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8, 238.Google Scholar
Hochkirch, A., Groning, J. & Bucker, A. 2007. Sympatry with the devil: reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76, 633–642.Google Scholar
Hodge, S.J. 2005. Helpers benefit offspring in both the short and long-term in the cooperatively breeding banded mongoose. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272, 2479–2484.Google Scholar
Hodge, S.J., Bell, M.B.V., Mwanghuya, F., et al. 2009. Maternal weight, offspring competition and the evolution of communal breeding. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 729–735.Google Scholar
Hodge, S.J., Bell, M.B. & Cant, M.A. 2011. Reproductive competition and the evolution of extreme birth synchrony in a cooperative mammal. Biology Letters, 7, 54–56.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, J.D. & Bruna, E.M. 2000. Pursuing the big questions about interspecific mutualism: a review of theoretical approaches. Oecologia, 125, 321–330.Google Scholar
Hof, C., Levinsky, I., Araújo, M.B. & Rahbek, C. 2011. Rethinking species’ ability to cope with rapid climate change. Global Change Biology, 17, 2987–2990.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, A.A. & Sgrò, C.M. 2011. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature, 470, 479.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H.A., Beery, A.K., Blumstein, D.T., et al. 2014. An evolutionary framework for studying mechanisms of social behavior. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 581–589.Google Scholar
Holbrook, C.T., Barden, P.M. & Fewell, J.H. 2011. Division of labor increases with colony size in the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 960–966.Google Scholar
Holman, L., Jorgensen, C.G., Nielsen, J. & d’Ettorre, P. 2010. Identification of an ant queen pheromone regulating worker sterility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 3793–3800.Google Scholar
Holmes, W.G. & Sherman, P.W. 1983. Kin recognition in animals: the prevalence of nepotism among animals raises basic questions about how and why they distinguish relatives from unrelated individuals. The American Scientist, 71, 46–55.Google Scholar
Holt, R.D. 1977. Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theoretical Population Biology, 12, 197–229.Google Scholar
Honza, M., Taborsky, B., Taborsky, M., et al. 2002. Behaviour of female common cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, in the vicinity of host nests before and during egg laying: a radiotelemetry study. Animal Behaviour, 64, 861–868.Google Scholar
Hoppitt, W. & Laland, K.N. 2013. Social Learning: an Introduction to Mechanisms, Methods, and Models. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Horak, P., Tegelmann, L., Ots, I. & Möller, A.P. 1999. Immune function and survival of great tit nestlings in relation to growth conditions. Oecologia, 121, 316–322.Google Scholar
Horner, V., Carter, J., Suchak, M. & de Waal, F.B. 2011. Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 13847–13851.Google Scholar
Houston, A.I. & Davies, N.B. 1985. The evolution of cooperation and life history in the dunnock Prunella modularis. In Sibley, R.M. & Smith, R.H. (eds), Behavioural Ecology, pp. 471–487. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Houston, A.I. & McNamara, J.M. 1991. Evolutionarily stable strategies in the repeated hawk–dove game. Behavioral Ecology, 2, 219–227.Google Scholar
Houston, A.I., McCleery, R.H. & Davies, N.B. 1985. Territory size, prey renewal and feeding rates – interpretation of observations on the pied wagtail (Motacilla alba) by simulation. Journal of Animal Ecology, 54, 227–239.Google Scholar
Houston, A.I., Szekely, T. & McNamara, J.M. 2005. Conflict between parents over care. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 33–38.Google Scholar
Höglund, J. 2003. Lek-kin in birds – provoking theory and surprising new results. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 40, 249–253.Google Scholar
Höglund, J., Alatalo, R.V., Lundberg, A., Rintamäki, P.T. & Lindell, J. 1999. Microsatellite markers reveal the potential for kin selection on black grouse leks. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 266, 813–816.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. 2009. The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance and Strangeness of Insect Societies. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Hsu, Y.Y., Earley, R.L. & Wolf, L.L. 2006. Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biological Reviews, 81, 33–74.Google Scholar
Hughes, J.M., Mather, P.B., Toon, A., et al. 2003. High levels of extra-group paternity in a population of Australian magpies Gymnorhina tibicen: evidence from microsatellite analysis. Molecular Ecology, 12, 3441–3450.Google Scholar
Hughes, W.O.H., Oldroyd, B.P., Beekman, M. & Ratnieks, F.L.W. 2008. Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science, 320, 1213–1216.Google Scholar
Hulcr, J. & Dunn, R.R. 2011. The sudden emergence of pathogenicity in insect–fungus symbioses threatens naive forest ecosystems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278, 2866–2873.Google Scholar
Huntingford, F.A., Lazarus, J., Barrie, B.D. & Webb, S. 1994. A dynamic analysis of cooperative predator inspection in sticklebacks. Animal Behaviour, 47, 413–423.Google Scholar
Huth, A. & Wissel, C. 1994. The simulation of fish schools in comparison with experimental data. Ecological Modelling, 75, 135–146.Google Scholar
Iguchi, K. & Abe, S. 2002. Territorial defense of an excess food supply by an algal grazing fish, ayu. Ecological Research, 17, 373–380.Google Scholar
Ilmonen, P., Stundner, G., Thoss, M. & Penn, D.J. 2009. Females prefer the scent of outbred males: good-genes-as-heterozygosity? BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9, 104.Google Scholar
Inglis, R.F., Garfjeld Roberts, P., Gardner, A. & Buckling, A. 2011. Spite and the scale of competition in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The American Naturalist, 178, 276–285.Google Scholar
Inglis, R.F., West, S. & Buckling, A. 2014. An experimental study of strong reciprocity in bacteria. Biology Letters, 10, 20131069.Google Scholar
Ingvarsson, P.K. 1998. Kin-structured colonization in Phalacrus substriatus. Heredity, 80, 456.Google Scholar
Innes, R.J., McEachern, M.B., Van Vuren, D.H., et al. 2012. Genetic relatedness and spatial associations of dusky-footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes). Journal of Mammalogy, 93, 439–446.Google Scholar
Inzani, E.L., Marshall, H.H., Sanderson, J.L., et al. 2016. Female reproductive competition explains variation in prenatal investment in wild banded mongooses. Scientific Reports, 6, 20013.Google Scholar
Ioannou, C.C., Guttal, V. & Couzin, I.D. 2012. Predatory fish select for coordinated collective motion in virtual prey. Science, 337, 1212–1215.Google Scholar
Irwin, A.J. & Taylor, P.D. 2001. Evolution of altruism in stepping-stone populations with overlapping generations. Theoretical Population Biology, 60, 315–325.Google Scholar
Isack, H.A. & Reyer, H.U. 1989. Honeyguides and honey gatherers: interspecific communication in a symbiotic relationship. Science, 243, 1343–1346.Google Scholar
Iserbyt, A., Farrell, S., Eens, M. & Muller, W. 2015. Sex-specific negotiation rules in a costly conflict over parental care. Animal Behaviour, 100, 52–58.Google Scholar
Iserbyt, A., Fresneau, N., Kortenhoff, T., Eens, M. & Muller, W. 2017. Decreasing parental task specialization promotes conditional cooperation. Scientific Reports, 7, 6565.Google Scholar
Isvaran, K. & Ponkshe, A. 2013. How general is a female mating preference for clustered males in lekking species? A meta-analysis. Animal Behaviour, 86, 417–425.Google Scholar
Ito, K., McNamara, J.M., Yamauchi, A. & Higginson, A.D. 2017. The evolution of cooperation by negotiation in a noisy world. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 30, 603–615.Google Scholar
Iwagami, A. & Masuda, N. 2010. Upstream reciprocity in heterogeneous networks. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 265, 297–305.Google Scholar
Izawa, K. 1980. Social behavior of the wild black-capped capuchin (Cebus apella). Primates, 21, 443–467.Google Scholar
Jaafar, Z. & Zeng, Y. 2012. Visual acuity of the goby-associated shrimp, Alpheus rapax Fabricius, 1798 (Decapoda, Alpheidae). Crustaceana, 85, 1487–1497.Google Scholar
Jaatinen, K., Jaari, S., O’Hara, R.B., Jöst, M. & Merilä, J. 2009. Relatedness and spatial proximity as determinants of host–parasite interactions in the brood parasitic Barrow’s goldeneye (Bucephala islandica). Molecular Ecology, 18, 2713–2721.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D.S. & Jarvis, J.U.M. 1996. No evidence for the work-conflict hypothesis in the eusocial naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 39, 401–409.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, A.V. & Gurven, M. 2013. Natural cooperators: food sharing in humans and other primates. Evolutionary Anthropology, 22, 186–195.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, A.V. & van Schaik, C.P. 2011. The evolution of food sharing in primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 2125–2140.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, A.V., Stevens, J.M. & Van Schaik, C.P. 2010. Tolerant food sharing and reciprocity is precluded by despotism among bonobos but not chimpanzees. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 143, 41–51.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, A.V., De Groot, E., Stevens, J.M. & Van Schaik, C.P. 2013. Mechanisms of reciprocity in primates: testing for short-term contingency of grooming and food sharing in bonobos and chimpanzees. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 69–77.Google Scholar
Jamieson, I.G., Quinn, J.S., Rose, P.A. & White, B.N. 1994. Shared paternity among non-relatives is a result of an egalitarian mating system in a communally breeding bird, the pukeko. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 257, 271–277.Google Scholar
Jandt, J.M., Tibbetts, E.A. & Toth, A.L. 2014. Polistes paper wasps: a model genus for the study of social dominance hierarchies. Insectes Sociaux, 61, 11–27.Google Scholar
Jaramillo, J.L., Ospina, C.M., Gil, Z.N., Montoya, E.C. & Benavides, P. 2011. Advances on the biology of Corthylus zulmae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Alnus acuminata (Betulaceae). Revista Colombiana de Entomologia, 37, 48–55.Google Scholar
Jeanne, R.L. 1991. The swarm-founding Polistinae. In Ross, K.G. & Matthews, R.W. (eds), The Social Biology of Wasps, pp. 191–231. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jennions, M.D. & Macdonald, D.W. 1994. Cooperative breeding in mammals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9, 89–93.Google Scholar
Jetz, W. & Rubenstein, D.R. 2011. Environmental uncertainty and the global biogeography of cooperative breeding in birds. Current Biology, 21, 72–78.Google Scholar
Jirotkul, M. 1999. Population density influences male–male competition in guppies. Animal Behaviour, 58, 1169–1175.Google Scholar
Johansen, J.L., Vaknin, R., Steffensen, J.F. & Domenici, P. 2010. Kinematics and energetic benefits of schooling in the labriform fish, striped surfperch Embiotoca lateralis. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 420, 221–229.Google Scholar
Johns, P.M., Howard, K.J., Breisch, N.L., Rivera, A. & Thorne, B.L. 2009. Nonrelatives inherit colony resources in a primitive termite. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 17452–17456.Google Scholar
Johnston, C.E. 1994. Nest association in fishes: evidence for mutualism. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 35, 379–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, R.A. 2000. Models of reproductive skew: a review and synthesis. Ethology, 106, 5–26.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R.A. 2001. Eavesdropping and animal conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 9177–9180.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R.A. 2008. Kin selection, local competition, and reproductive skew. Evolution, 62, 2592–2599.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R.A. 2011. Load lightening and negotiation over offspring care in cooperative breeders. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 436–444.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R.A. & Cant, M.A. 1999. Reproductive skew and the threat of eviction: a new perspective. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 266, 275–279.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R.A. & Cant, M.A. 2008. Sex differences in dispersal and the evolution of helping and harming. American Naturalist, 172, 318–330.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R. & Cant, M.A. 2009. Models of reproductive skew: outside options and the resolution of reproductive conflict. In Hager, R. & Jones, C.B. (eds), Reproductive Skew in Vertebrates: Proximate and Ultimate Causes, pp. 3–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R.A. & Cant, M.A. 2010. The evolution of menopause in cetaceans and humans: the role of demography. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 3765–3771.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R.A. & Hinde, C. 2006. Negotiation over offspring care – how should parents respond to each other’s efforts? Behavioral Ecology, 17, 818–827.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R.A. & Keller, L. 2000. How males can gain by harming their mates: sexual conflict, seminal toxins, and the cost of mating. The American Naturalist, 156, 368–377.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R.A. & Roulin, A. 2003. Sibling negotiation. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 780–786.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R.A. & Savage, J.L. 2019. Conditional cooperation and turn-taking in parental care. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 335.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R.A., Cant, M.A. & Field, J. 2012. Sex-biased dispersal, haplodiploidy and the evolution of helping in social insects. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 279, 787–793.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R.A., Manica, A., Fayet, A.L., et al. 2014. Reciprocity and conditional cooperation between great tit parents. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 216–222.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R.A., Cant, M.A., Cram, D. & Thompson, F.J. 2020. Exploitative leaders incite violent intergroup conflict in a social mammal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117, 29759–29766.Google Scholar
Jolles, J.W., King, A.J., Manica, A. & Thornton, A. 2013. Heterogeneous structure in mixed-species corvid flocks in flight. Animal Behaviour, 85, 743–750.Google Scholar
Jolles, J.W., Boogert, N.J., Sridhar, V.H., Couzin, I.D. & Manica, A. 2017. Consistent individual differences drive collective behavior and group functioning of schooling fish. Current Biology, 27, 2862–2868.Google Scholar
Jolles, J.W., King, A.J. & Killen, S.S. 2020. The role of individual heterogeneity in collective animal behaviour. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 35, 278–291.Google Scholar
Jones, E.I., Bronstein, J.L. & Ferriere, R. 2012. The fundamental role of competition in the ecology and evolution of mutualisms. Year in Evolutionary Biology, 1256, 66–88.Google Scholar
Jones, H.A.C., Noble, C., Damsgård, B. & Pearce, G.P. 2012. Investigating the influence of predictable and unpredictable feed delivery schedules upon the behaviour and welfare of Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar) using social network analysis and fin damage. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 138, 132–140.Google Scholar
Jordal, B.H. & Cognato, A.I. 2012. Molecular phylogeny of bark and ambrosia beetles reveals multiple origins of fungus farming during periods of global warming. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 12, 133.Google Scholar
Jordan, L.A., Wong, M.Y. & Balshine, S.S. 2010. The effects of familiarity and social hierarchy on group membership decisions in a social fish. Biology Letters, 6, 301–303.Google Scholar
Jordan, N.R., Buse, C., Wilson, A.M., et al. 2017. Dynamics of direct inter-pack encounters in endangered African wild dogs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71, 115.Google Scholar
Josi, D., Taborsky, M. & Frommen, J.G. 2020a. Investment of group members is contingent on helper number and the presence of young in a cooperative breeder. Animal Behaviour, 160, 35–42.Google Scholar
Josi, D., Freudiger, A., Taborsky, M. & Frommen, J.G. 2020b. Experimental predator intrusions in a cooperative breeder reveal task partitioning of group members. Behavioral Ecology, 31, 1369–1378.Google Scholar
Jungwirth, A. & Taborsky, M. 2015. First- and second-order sociality determine survival and reproduction in cooperative cichlids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20151971.Google Scholar
Jungwirth, A., Walker, J. & Taborsky, M. 2015a. Prospecting precedes dispersal and increases survival chances in cooperatively breeding cichlids. Animal Behaviour, 106, 107–114.Google Scholar
Jungwirth, A., Josi, D., Walker, J. & Taborsky, M. 2015b. Benefits of coloniality: communal defence saves anti-predator effort in cooperative breeders. Functional Ecology, 29, 1218–1224.Google Scholar
Kaburu, S.S. & Newton-Fisher, N.E. 2015. Egalitarian despots: hierarchy steepness, reciprocity and the grooming-trade model in wild chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Animal Behaviour, 99, 61–71.Google Scholar
Kagel, J.H., Green, L. & Caraco, T. 1986. When foragers discount the future – constraint or adaptation. Animal Behaviour, 34, 271–283.Google Scholar
Kaniewska, P., Alon, S., Karako-Lampert, S., Hoegh-Guldberg, O. & Levy, O. 2015. Signaling cascades and the importance of moonlight in coral broadcast mass spawning. Elife, 4, e09991.Google Scholar
Kappeler, P.M. 2017. Sex roles and adult sex ratios: insights from mammalian biology and consequences for primate behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 372, 20160321.Google Scholar
Kappeler, P.M. & Fichtel, C. 2012. Female reproductive competition in Eulemur rufifrons: eviction and reproductive restraint in a plurally breeding Malagasy primate. Molecular Ecology, 21, 685–698.Google Scholar
Kappeler, P.M. & van Schaik, C.P. 2002. Evolution of primate social systems. International Journal of Primatology, 23, 707–740.Google Scholar
Kardile, S.P. & Gadagkar, R. 2002. Docile sitters and active fighters in paper wasps: a tale of two queens. Naturwissenschaften, 89, 176–179.Google Scholar
Karplus, I. & Thompson, A. 2011. The partnership between gobiid fishes and burrowing alpheid shrimps. In Patzner, R.A., Van Tassell, J.L., Kovačić, M. & Kapoor, B.G. (eds), The Biology of Gobies, pp. 559–607. New York, NY: Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Kasper, C., Colombo, M., Aubin-Horth, N. & Taborsky, B. 2018. Brain activation patterns following a cooperation opportunity in a highly social cichlid fish. Physiology & Behavior, 195, 37–47.Google Scholar
Katula, R.S. & Page, L.M. 1998. Nest association between a large predator, the bowfin (Amia calva), and its prey, the golden shiner (Notemigonus crysoleucas). Copeia, 220–221.Google Scholar
Katz, L., Levitt, S.D. & Shustorovich, E. 2003. Prison conditions, capital punishment, and deterrence. American Law and Economics Review, 5, 318–343.Google Scholar
Katz, Y., Tunstrøm, K., Ioannou, C.C., Huepe, C. & Couzin, I.D. 2011. Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 18720–18725.Google Scholar
Kawasaki, Y., Ito, M., Miura, K. & Kajimura, H. 2010. Superinfection of five Wolbachia in the alnus ambrosia beetle, Xylosandrus germanus (Blandford) (Coleoptera: Curuculionidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 100, 231–239.Google Scholar
Keane, B., Waser, P.M., Creel, S.R., et al. 1994. Subordinate reproduction in dwarf mongooses. Animal Behaviour, 47, 65–75.Google Scholar
Keen, W.H. & Reed, R.W. 1985. Territorial defense of space and feeding sites by a plethodontid salamander. Animal Behaviour, 33, 1119–1123.Google Scholar
Keenleyside, M.H.A. 1991. Parental care. In Keenleyside, M.H.A. (ed.), Cichlid Fishes: Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution, pp. 191–208. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Keller, L. 1997. Indiscriminate altruism: unduly nice parents and siblings. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 12, 99–103.Google Scholar
Keller, L. & Reeve, H.K. 1994. Partitioning of reproduction in animal societies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9, 98–102.Google Scholar
Keller, L. & Ross, K.G. 1998. Selfish genes: a green beard in the red fire ant. Nature, 394, 573.Google Scholar
Keller, L.F. & Waller, D.M. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 230–241.Google Scholar
Keller, L., Peer, K., Bernasconi, C., Taborsky, M. & Shuker, D.M. 2011. Inbreeding and selection on sex ratio in the bark beetle Xylosandrus germanus. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 11, 359.Google Scholar
Kellogg, K.A., Markert, J.A., Stuaffer, J.R. Jr & Kocher, T.D. 1995. Microsatellite variation demonstrates multiple paternity in lekking cichlid fishes from Lake Malawi, Africa. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 260, 79–84.Google Scholar
Kellogg, K.A., Markert, J.A., Stauffer, J.R. & Kocher, T.D. 1998. Intraspecific brood mixing and reduced polyandry in a maternal mouth-brooding cichlid. Behavioral Ecology, 9, 309–312.Google Scholar
Kempenaers, B.A.R.T. & Dhondt, A.A. 1993. Why do females engage in extra-pair copulations? A review of hypotheses and their predictions. Belgian Journal of Zoology, 123, 93.Google Scholar
Kempenaers, B.A.R.T. & Sheldon, B.C. 1997. Studying paternity and paternal care: pitfalls and problems. Animal Behaviour, 53, 423–427.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P., Higginson, A.D., Radford, A.N. & Sumner, S. 2018. Altruism in a volatile world. Nature, 555, 359–362.Google Scholar
Kent, D.I., Fisher, J.D. & Marliave, J.B. 2011. Interspecific nesting in marine fishes: spawning of the spinynose sculpin, Asemichthys taylori, on the eggs of the buffalo sculpin, Enophrys bison. Ichthyological Research, 58, 355–359.Google Scholar
Kent, D.S. & Simpson, J.A. 1992. Eusociality in the beetle Austroplatypus incompertus (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Naturwissenschaften, 79, 86–87.Google Scholar
Kern, J.M. & Radford, A.N. 2018. Experimental evidence for delayed contingent cooperation among wild dwarf mongooses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 6255–6260.Google Scholar
Kerth, G. 2008. Causes and consequences of sociality in bats. Bioscience, 58, 737–746.Google Scholar
Kerth, G. & Reckardt, K. 2003. Information transfer about roosts in female Bechstein’s bats: an experimental field study. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270, 511–515.Google Scholar
Kettler, N., Schweinfurth, M.K. & Taborsky, M. 2021. Rats show direct reciprocity when interacting with multiple partners. Scientific Reports, 11, 3228.Google Scholar
Keynan, O., Ridley, A.R. & Lotem, A. 2015. Social foraging strategies and acquisition of novel foraging skills in cooperatively breeding Arabian babblers. Behavioral Ecology, 26, 207–214.Google Scholar
Kiers, E.T. & West, S.A. 2015. Evolving new organisms via symbiosis. Science, 348, 392–394.Google Scholar
Kiers, E.T., Duhamel, M., Beesetty, Y., et al. 2011. Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science, 333, 880–882.Google Scholar
Killingback, T. & Doebeli, M. 2002. The continuous prisoner’s dilemma and the evolution of cooperation through reciprocal altruism with variable investment. American Naturalist, 160, 421–438.Google Scholar
Kilner, R.M. & Hinde, C.A. 2008. Information warfare and parent–offspring conflict. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 38, 283–336.Google Scholar
Kilner, R.M. & Hinde, C.A. 2012. Parent–offspring conflict. In Royle, N.J., Smiseth, P.T. & Kölliker, M. (eds), The Evolution of Parental Care, pp. 119–132. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kilner, R.M. & Langmore, N.E. 2011. Cuckoos versus hosts in insects and birds: adaptations, counter-adaptations and outcomes. Biological Reviews, 86, 836–852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J.-W., Wood, J.L.A., Grant, J.W.A. & Brown, G.E. 2011. Acute and chronic increases in predation risk affect the territorial behaviour of juvenile Atlantic salmon in the wild. Animal Behaviour, 81, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, W.J. 1989a. Spacing of female kin in Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 67, 91–95.Google Scholar
King, W.J. 1989b. Kin-differential behaviour of adult female Columbian ground squirrels. Animal Behaviour, 38, 354–356.Google Scholar
Kingma, S.A. 2017. Direct benefits explain interspecific variation in helping behaviour among cooperatively breeding birds. Nature Communications, 8, 1–7.Google Scholar
Kingma, S.A., Santema, P., Taborsky, M. & Komdeur, J. 2014. Group augmentation and the evolution of cooperation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 476–484.Google Scholar
Kingma, S.A., Bebbington, K., Hammers, M., Richardson, D.S. & Komdeur, J. 2016a. Delayed dispersal and the costs and benefits of different routes to independent breeding in a cooperatively breeding bird. Evolution, 70, 2595–2610.Google Scholar
Kingma, S.A., Komdeur, J., Hammers, M. & Richardson, D.S. 2016b. The cost of prospecting for dispersal opportunities in a social bird. Biology Letters, 12, 20160316.Google Scholar
Kingma, S.A., Komdeur, J., Burke, T. & Richardson, D.S. 2017. Differential dispersal costs and sex-biased dispersal distance in a cooperatively breeding bird. Behavioral Ecology, 28, 1113–1121.Google Scholar
Kirkendall, L.R. 1993. Ecology and evolution of biased sex ratios in bark and ambrosia beetles. In Wrensch, D.L. & Ebbert, M.A. (eds), Evolution and Diversity of Sex Ratio in Insects and Mites, pp. 235–345. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Kirkendall, L.R. 2006. A new host-specific, Xyleborus vochysiae (Curculionidae: Scolytinae), from Central America breeding in live trees. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 99, 211–217.Google Scholar
Kirkendall, L.R., Kent, D.S. & Raffa, K.F. 1997. Interactions among males, females and offspring in bark and ambrosia beetles: the significance of living in tunnels for the evolution of social behavior. In Choe, J.C. & Crespi, B.J. (eds), The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids, pp. 181–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirkendall, L.R., Biedermann, P.H. & Jordal, B.H. 2015. Evolution and diversity of bark and ambrosia beetles. In Vega, F.E. & Hofstetter, R.W. (eds), Bark Beetles. Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species, pp. 85–156. Amsterdam: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Klaassen, M., Brenninkmeijer, A., Boix-Hinzen, C. & Mendelsohn, J. 2003. Fathers with highly demanding partners and offspring in a semidesert environment: energetic aspects of the breeding system of Monteiro’s hornbills (Tockus monteiri) in Namibia. Auk, 120, 866–873.Google Scholar
Klug, H. 2018. Why monogamy? A review of potential ultimate drivers. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 30.Google Scholar
Klug, H. & Bonsall, M.B. 2007. When to care for, abandon, or eat your offspring: the evolution of parental care and filial cannibalism. The American Naturalist, 170, 88–901.Google Scholar
Knapp, R.A. & Sargent, R.C. 1989. Egg-mimicry as a mating strategy in the fantail darter, Etheostoma flabellare: females prefer males with eggs. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 25, 321–326.Google Scholar
Knapp, R., Wingfield, J.C. & Bass, A.H. 1999. Steroid hormones and paternal care in the plainfin midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus). Hormones and Behavior, 35, 81–89.Google Scholar
Knell, R.J. 2009. Population density and the evolution of male aggression. Journal of Zoology, 278, 83–90.Google Scholar
Knopp, T., Heimovirta, M., Kokko, H. & Merilä, J. 2008. Do male moor frogs (Rana arvalis) lek with kin? Molecular Ecology, 17, 2522–2530.Google Scholar
Koblmüller, S., Odhiambo, E.A., Sinyinza, D., Sturmbauer, C. & Sefc, K.M. 2015. Big fish, little divergence: phylogeography of Lake Tanganyika’s giant cichlid, Boulengerochromis microlepis. Hydrobiologia, 748, 29–38.Google Scholar
Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. 2004. Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. 2016. Cooperative Breeding in Vertebrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koenig, W. & Haydock, J. 2004. Incest and incest avoidance. In Koenig, W. & Dickinson, J. (eds), Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, pp. 142–156. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koenig, W.D. & Walters, E.L. 2011. Age-related provisioning behaviour in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker: testing the skills and the pay-to-stay hypotheses. Animal Behaviour, 82, 437–444.Google Scholar
Koenig, W.D., Pitelka, F.A., Carmen, W.J., Mumme, R.L. & Stanback, M.T. 1992. The evolution of delayed dispersal in cooperative breeders. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 67, 111–150.Google Scholar
Koenig, W.D., Haydock, J. & Stanback, M.T. 1998. Reproductive roles in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker: incest avoidance versus reproductive competition. The American Naturalist, 151, 243–255.Google Scholar
Koenig, W.D., Hooge, P.N., Stanback, M.T. & Haydock, J. 2000. Natal dispersal in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker. The Condor, 102, 492–502.Google Scholar
Koenig, W.D., Walters, E.L. & Haydock, J. 2009. Helpers and egg investment in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker: testing the concealed helper effects hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63, 1659–1665.Google Scholar
Koenig, W.D., Dickinson, J.L. & Emlen, S.T. 2016. Synthesis: cooperative breeding in the twenty-first century. In Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. (eds), Cooperative Breeding in Vertebrates: Studies of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, pp. 353–374. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koenig, W.D., Walters, E.L. & Barve, S. 2019. Does helping-at-the-nest help? The case of the acorn woodpecker. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 272.Google Scholar
Koga, T. & Ikeda, S. 2010. Perceived predation risk and mate defense jointly alter the outcome of territorial fights. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64, 827–833.Google Scholar
Kohda, M. 1997. Interspecific society among herbivorous cichlid fishes. In Kawanabe, H., Hori, M. & Nagoshi, M. (eds), Fish Communities of Lake Tanganyika, pp. 107–120. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.Google Scholar
Kohda, M., Heg, D., Makino, Y., et al. 2009. Living on the wedge: female control of paternity in a cooperatively polyandrous cichlid. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276, 4207–4214.Google Scholar
Kohda, M., Jordan, L.A., Hotta, T., et al. 2015. Facial recognition in a group-living cichlid fish. PLoS One, 10, e0142552.Google Scholar
Kokko, H. 2013. Dyadic contests: modelling flights between two individuals. In Hardy, I.C.W. & Briffa, M. (eds), Animal Contests. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kokko, H. & Lindström, J. 1996. Kin selection and the evolution of leks: whose success do young males maximize? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 263, 919–923.Google Scholar
Kokko, H., Johnstone, R.A. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2001. The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268, 187–196.Google Scholar
Kokko, H., Johnstone, R.A. & Wright, J. 2002. The evolution of parental and alloparental effort in cooperatively breeding groups: when should helpers pay to stay? Behavioral Ecology, 13, 291–300.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J. 1992. Importance of habitat saturation and territory quality for evolution of cooperative breeding in the Seychelles warbler. Nature, 358, 493–495.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J. 1994a. Experimental evidence for helping and hindering by previous offspring in the cooperative-breeding Seychelles warbler Acrocephalus sechellensis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 34, 175–186.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J. 1994b. The effect of kinship on helping in the cooperative breeding Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 256, 47–52.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J. 1994c. Conserving the Seychelles warbler Acrocephalus sechellensis by translocation from Cousin Island to the islands of Aride and Cousine. Biological Conservation, 67, 143–152.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J. 1996a. Influence of age on reproductive performance in the Seychelles warbler. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 417–425.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J. 1996b. Seasonal timing of reproduction in a tropical bird, the Seychelles warbler: a field experiment using translocation. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 11, 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komdeur, J. 1996c. Influence of helping and breeding experience on reproductive performance in the Seychelles warbler: a translocation experiment. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 326–333.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J. & Daan, S. 2005. Breeding in the monsoon: semi-annual reproduction in the Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). Journal of Ornithology, 146, 305–313.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J. & Edelaar, P. 2001a. Male Seychelles warblers use territory budding to maximize lifetime fitness in a saturated environment. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 706–715.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J. & Edelaar, P. 2001b. Evidence that helping at the nest does not result in territory inheritance in the Seychelles warbler. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268, 2007–2012.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J. & Ekman, J. 2010. Adaptations and constraints in the evolution of delayed dispersal: implications for cooperation. In Szekely, T., Moore, A.J. & Komdeur, J. (eds), Social Behaviour. Genes, Ecology and Evolution, pp. 306–327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J. & Hatchwell, B.J. 1999. Kin recognition: function and mechanism in avian societies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 237–241.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J. & Kats, R.K. 1999. Predation risk affects trade-off between nest guarding and foraging in Seychelles warblers. Behavioral Ecology, 10, 648–658.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J. & Pels, M.t.D. 2005. Rescue of the Seychelles warbler on Cousin Island, Seychelles: the role of habitat restoration. Biological Conservation, 124, 15–26.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J., Huffstadt, A., Prast, , et al. 1995. Transfer experiments of Seychelles warblers to new islands: changes in dispersal and helping behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 49, 695–708.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J., Daan, S., Tinbergen, J. & Mateman, C. 1997. Extreme adaptive modification in sex ratio of the Seychelles warbler’s eggs. Nature, 385, 522–525.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J., Richardson, D.S., Hammers, M., et al. 2001. The evolution of cooperative breeding in vertebrates. eLS, 1–11.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J., Piersma, T., Kraaijeveld, K., Kraaijeveld-Smit, F. & Richardson, D.S. 2004a. Why Seychelles warblers fail to recolonize nearby islands: unwilling or unable to fly there? Ibis, 146, 298–302.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J., Richardson, D.S. & Burke, T. 2004b. Experimental evidence that kin discrimination in the Seychelles warbler is based on association and not on genetic relatedness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 271, 963.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J., Eikenaar, C., Brouwer, L. & Richardson, D.S. 2008. The evolution and ecology of cooperative breeding in vertebrates. eLS.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J., Burke, T., Dugdale, H.L. & Richardson, D.S. 2016. Seychelles warblers: Complexities of the helping paradox. In Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. (eds), Cooperative Breeding in Vertebrates. Studies of Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour, pp. 197–216. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Komdeur, J., Richardson, D.S., Hammers, M., et al. 2017. The evolution of cooperative breeding in vertebrates. eLS. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0021218.pub2Google Scholar
Kondoh, M. & Higashi, M. 2000. Reproductive isolation mechanism resulting from resolution of intragenomic conflict. American Naturalist, 156, 511–518.Google Scholar
Korb, J. & Heinze, J. 2004. Multilevel selection and social evolution of insect societies. Naturwissenschaften, 91, 291–304.Google Scholar
Korolev, K.S., Xavier, J.B. & Gore, J. 2014. Turning ecology and evolution against cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer, 14, 371.Google Scholar
Korpimäki, E., Norrdahl, K. & Rinta-Jaskari, T. 1991. Responses of stoats and least weasels to fluctuating food abundances: is the low phase of the vole cycle due to mustelid predation? Oecologia, 88, 552–561.Google Scholar
Korpimäki, E., Oksanen, L., Oksanen, T., et al. 2005. Vole cycles and predation in temperate and boreal zones of Europe. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 1150–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, J., Lukas, D., Nolin, D., et al. 2019. Kinship ties across the lifespan in human communities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 374.Google Scholar
Kotiaho, J.S., Simmons, L.W., Hunt, J. & Tomkins, J.L. 2003. Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Onthophagus taurus. The American Naturalist, 161, 852–859.Google Scholar
Kotrschal, A. & Taborsky, B. 2010. Resource defence or exploded lek? – A question of perspective. Ethology, 116, 1189–1198.Google Scholar
Kotrschal, K., Hemetsberger, J. & Dittami, J. 1993. Food exploitation by a winter flock of greylag geese – behavioral dynamics, competition and social status. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 33, 289–295.Google Scholar
Koyama, N. 1973. Dominance, grooming, and clasped-sleeping relationships among bonnet monkeys in India. Primates, 14, 225–244.Google Scholar
Koyama, N., Caws, C. & Aureli, F. 2006. Interchange of grooming and agonistic support in chimpanzees. International Journal of Primatology, 27, 1293–1309.Google Scholar
Koykka, C. & Wild, G. 2015. The evolution of group dispersal with leaders and followers. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 371, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kölliker, M., Boos, S., Wong, J.W.Y., et al. 2015. Parent–offspring conflict and the genetic trade-offs shaping parental investment. Nature Communications, 6, 6850.Google Scholar
König, B. 1989. Kin recognition and maternal care under restricted feeding in house mice (Mus domesticus). Ethology, 82, 328–343.Google Scholar
König, B. 1994. Components of lifetime reproductive success in communally and solitarily nursing house mice – a laboratory study. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 34, 275–283.Google Scholar
Kraak, S.B. 1996. Female preference and filial cannibalism in Aidablennius sphynx (Teleostei, Blenniidae); a combined field and laboratory study. Behavioural Processes, 36, 85–97.Google Scholar
Kraak, S.B.M. & Groothuis, T.G.G. 1994. Female preference for nests with eggs is based on the presence of the eggs themselves. Behaviour, 131, 189–206.Google Scholar
Kraak, S.B.M., Bakker, T.C.M. & Mundwiler, B. 1999. Correlates of the duration of the egg collecting phase in the three-spined stickleback. Journal of Fish Biology, 54, 1038–1049.Google Scholar
Krafft, B., Colin, C. & Peignot, P. 1994. Diving for food – a new model to assess social roles in a group of laboratory rats. Ethology, 96, 11–23.Google Scholar
Krakauer, A.H. 2005. Kin selection and cooperative courtship in wild turkeys. Nature, 434, 69–72.Google Scholar
Krakauer, A.H. & DuVal, E.H. 2011. Kin selection and cooperative courtship in birds. In Salmon, C.A. & Shackelford, T.K. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Family Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krama, T., Vrublevska, J., Freeberg, T.M., et al. 2012. You mob my owl, I’ll mob yours: birds play tit-for-tat game. Scientific Reports, 2, 800.Google Scholar
Kramer, J., Klauke, N., Bauer, M. & Schaefer, H.M. 2016. No evidence for enforced alloparental care in a cooperatively breeding parrot. Ethology, 122, 389–398.Google Scholar
Krams, I., Krama, T., Igaune, K. & Maend, R. 2008. Experimental evidence of reciprocal altruism in the pied flycatcher. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 599–605.Google Scholar
Krams, I., Berzins, A., Krama, T., et al. 2010. The increased risk of predation enhances cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 513–518.Google Scholar
Krams, I., Kokko, H., Vrublevska, J., et al. 2013. The excuse principle can maintain cooperation through forgivable defection in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 280, 20131475.Google Scholar
Krasheninnikova, A., Brucks, D., Blanc, S. & von Bayern, A.M.P. 2019. Assessing African grey parrots’ prosocial tendencies in a token choice paradigm. Royal Society Open Science, 6, 190696.Google Scholar
Krause, J. & Godin, J.G. 1994. Shoal choice in the banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus, Teleostei, Cyprinodontidae): effects of predation risk, fish size, species composition and size of shoals. Ethology, 98, 128–136.Google Scholar
Krebs, J.R. 1974. Colonial nesting and social feeding as strategies for exploiting food resources in the great blue heron (Ardea herodias). Behaviour, 51, 99–134.Google Scholar
Kruuk, H. 1972. The Spotted Hyena: a Study of Predation and Social Behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuijper, B. & Johnstone, R.A. 2018. Maternal effects and parent–offspring conflict. Evolution, 72, 220–233.Google Scholar
Kunz, T.H. (ed.). 1982. Roosting ecology of bats. In Ecology of Bats, pp. 1–55. Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Kutsukake, N. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2006a. Aggression and submission reflect reproductive conflict between females in cooperatively breeding meerkats Suricata suricatta. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59, 541–548.Google Scholar
Kutsukake, N. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2006b. Social functions of allogrooming in cooperatively breeding meerkats. Animal Behaviour, 72, 1059–1068.Google Scholar
Kutsukake, N. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2010. Grooming and the value of social relationships in cooperatively breeding meerkats. Animal Behaviour, 79, 271–279.Google Scholar
Kutsukake, N., Inada, M., Sakamoto, S.H. & Okanoya, K. 2012. A distinct role of the queen in coordinated workload and soil distribution in eusocial naked mole-rats. PLoS One, 7, e44584.Google Scholar
Kümmerli, R., Gardner, A., West, S.A. & Griffin, A.S. 2009a. Limited dispersal, budding dispersal, and cooperation: an experimental study. Evolution, 63, 939–949.Google Scholar
Kümmerli, R., Griffin, A.S., West, S.A., Buckling, A. & Harrison, F. 2009b. Viscous medium promotes cooperation in the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276, 3531–3538.Google Scholar
Kvarnemo, C. 2018. Why do some animals mate with one partner rather than many? A review of causes and consequences of monogamy. Biological Reviews, 93, 1795–1812.Google Scholar
Lacey, E.A. & Sherman, P.W. 1991. Social organization of naked mole-rat colonies: evidence for divisions of labor. In Sherman, P.W., Jarvis, J.U.M. & Alexander, R.D. (eds), The Biology of the Naked Mole-Rat, pp. 275–336. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lacey, E.A., Braude, S.H. & Wieczorek, J.R. 1998. Solitary burrow use by adult Patagonian tuco-tucos (Ctenomys haigi). Journal of Mammalogy, 79, 986–991.Google Scholar
Lacey, E., O’Brien, S.L., Sobrero, R. & Ebensperger, L.A. 2019. Spatial relationships among free-living cururos (Spalacopus cyanus) demonstrate burrow sharing and communal nesting. Journal of Mammalogy, 100, 1918–1927.Google Scholar
Lahdenperä, M., Lummaa, V., Helle, S., Tremblay, M. & Russell, A.F. 2004. Fitness benefits of prolonged post-reproductive lifespan in women. Nature, 428, 178–181.Google Scholar
Lahdenperä, M., Gillespie, D.O., Lummaa, V. & Russell, A.F. 2012. Severe intergenerational reproductive conflict and the evolution of menopause. Ecology Letters, 15, 1283–1290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laidre, M.E. 2011. Ecological relations between hermit crabs and their shell-supplying gastropods: constrained consumers. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 397, 65–70.Google Scholar
Laidre, M.E. 2013. Eavesdropping foragers use level of collective commotion as public information to target high quality patches. Oikos, 122, 1505–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K.N., Sterelny, K., Odling-Smee, J., Hoppitt, W. & Uller, T. 2011. Cause and effect in biology revisited: is Mayr’s proximate–ultimate dichotomy still useful? Science, 334, 1512–1516.Google Scholar
Lalueza-Fox, C., Rosas, A., Estalrrich, A., et al. 2011. Genetic evidence for patrilocal mating behavior among Neandertal groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 250–253.Google Scholar
Lamba, S., Kazi, Y.C., Deshpande, S., et al. 2007. A possible novel function of dominance behaviour in queen-less colonies of the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata. Behavioural Processes, 74, 351–356.Google Scholar
Lambert, D.M., Millar, C.D., Jack, K., Anderson, S. & Craig, J.L. 1994. Single and multilocus DNA fingerprinting of communally breeding pukeko: do copulations or dominance ensure reproductive success? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91, 9641–9645.Google Scholar
Landa, J.T. 1998. Bioeconomics of schooling fishes: selfish fish, quasi-free riders, and other fishy tales. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 53, 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langen, K., Schwarzer, J., Kullmann, H., Bakker, T.C. & Thünken, T. 2011. Microsatellite support for active inbreeding in a cichlid fish. PLoS One, 6, e24689.Google Scholar
Langer, P., Hogendoorn, K. & Keller, L. 2004. Tug-of-war over reproduction in a social bee. Nature, 428, 844–847.Google Scholar
Langergraber, K., Mitani, J. & Vigilant, L. 2009. Kinship and social bonds in female chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). American Journal of Primatology, 71, 840–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lank, D.B. & Smith, C.M. 1992. Females prefer larger leks: field experiments with ruffs (Philomachus pugnax). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 30, 323–329.Google Scholar
Lank, D.B., Smith, C.M., Hanotte, O., Burke, T. & Cooke, F. 1995. Genetic polymorphism for alternative mating-behavior in lekking male ruff Philomachus pugnax. Nature, 378, 59–62.Google Scholar
Lank, D.B., Smith, C.M., Hanotte, O., et al. 2002. High frequency of polyandry in a lek mating system. Behavioral Ecology, 13, 209–215.Google Scholar
Larose, K. & Dubois, F. 2011. Constraints on the evolution of reciprocity: an experimental test with zebra finches. Ethology, 117, 115–123.Google Scholar
Laundré, J.W., Hernández, L. & Altendorf, K.B. 2001. Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the ‘landscape of fear’ in Yellowstone National Park, USA. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79, 1401–1409.Google Scholar
Lawler, R.R., Richard, A.F. & Riley, M.A. 2003. Genetic population structure of the white sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi) at Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve, southwest Madagascar (1992–2001). Molecular Ecology, 12, 2307–2317.Google Scholar
Lawson Handley, L.L. & Perrin, N. 2007. Advances in our understanding of mammalian sex-biased dispersal. Molecular Ecology, 16, 1559–1578.Google Scholar
Lazaro-Perea, C. 2001. Intergroup interactions in wild common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus: territorial defence and assessment of neighbours. Animal Behaviour, 62, 11–21.Google Scholar
Le Comber, S.C., Faulkes, C.G., Formosinho, J. & Smith, C. 2003. Response of territorial males to the threat of sneaking in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus): a field study. Journal of Zoology, 261, 15–20.Google Scholar
Le Roux, A., Cherry, M.I., Gygax, L. & Manser, M.B. 2009. Vigilance behaviour and fitness consequences: comparing a solitary foraging and an obligate group-foraging mammal. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63, 1097–1107.Google Scholar
Le Roux, A., Snyder-Mackler, N., Roberts, E.K., Beehner, J.C. & Bergman, T.J. 2013. Evidence for tactical concealment in a wild primate. Nature Communications, 4, 1–6.Google Scholar
Le Vin, A., Mable, B. & Arnold, K. 2010. Kin recognition via phenotype matching in a cooperatively breeding cichlid, Neolamprologus pulcher. Animal Behaviour, 79, 1109–1114.Google Scholar
Le Vin, A., Mable, B., Taborsky, M., Heg, D. & Arnold, K. 2011. Individual variation in helping in a cooperative breeder: relatedness versus behavioural type. Animal Behaviour, 82, 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leadbeater, E., Carruthers, J.M., Green, J.P., van Heusden, J. & Field, J. 2010. Unrelated helpers in a primitively eusocial wasp: is helping tailored toward direct fitness? PLoS One, 5, e11997.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, E., Carruthers, J.M., Green, J.P., Rosser, N.S. & Field, J. 2011. Nest inheritance is the missing source of direct fitness in a primitively eusocial insect. Science, 333, 874–876.Google Scholar
Lebigre, C., Alatalo, R.V., Forss, H.E. & Siitari, H. 2008. Low levels of relatedness on black grouse leks despite male philopatry. Molecular Ecology, 17, 4512–4521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leclaire, S., Nielsen, J.F., Thavarajah, N.K., Manser, M. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2013. Odour-based kin discrimination in the cooperatively breeding meerkat. Biology Letters, 9, 20121054.Google Scholar
Lee, J.W., Jang, B.S., Dawson, D.A., Burke, T. & Hatchwell, B.J. 2009. Fine-scale genetic structure and its consequence in breeding aggregations of a passerine bird. Molecular Ecology, 18, 2728–2739.Google Scholar
Lee, J.W., Lee, Y.K. & Hatchwell, B.J. 2010. Natal dispersal and philopatry in a group-living but noncooperative passerine bird, the vinous-throated parrotbill. Animal Behaviour, 79, 1017–1023.Google Scholar
Leggett, H.C., El Mouden, C., Wild, G. & West, S. 2011. Promiscuity and the evolution of cooperative breeding. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 279, 1405–1411.Google Scholar
Leggett, H.C., Wild, G., West, S.A. & Buckling, A. 2017. Fast-killing parasites can be favoured in spatially structured populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 372, 20160096.Google Scholar
Lehmann, L. 2007. The evolution of trans-generational altruism: kin selection meets niche construction. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 181–189.Google Scholar
Lehmann, L. & Balloux, F. 2007. Natural selection on fecundity variance in subdivided populations: kin selection meets bet hedging. Genetics, 176, 361–377.Google Scholar
Lehmann, L. & Feldman, M.W. 2008. War and the evolution of belligerence and bravery. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2877–2885.Google Scholar
Lehmann, L. & Keller, L. 2006a. The evolution of cooperation and altruism – a general framework and a classification of models. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19, 1365–1376.Google Scholar
Lehmann, L. & Keller, L. 2006b. Synergy, partner choice and frequency dependence: their integration into inclusive fitness theory and their interpretation in terms of direct and indirect fitness effects. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19, 1426–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, L. & Perrin, N. 2003. Inbreeding avoidance through kin recognition: choosy females boost male dispersal. The American Naturalist, 162, 638–652.Google Scholar
Lehmann, L. & Rousset, F. 2010. How life history and demography promote or inhibit the evolution of helping behaviours. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2599–2617.Google Scholar
Lehmann, L., Bargum, K. & Reuter, M. 2006. An evolutionary analysis of the relationship between spite and altruism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19, 1507–1516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehmann, L., Keller, L., West, S. & Roze, D. 2007. Group selection and kin selection: two concepts but one process. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 6736–6739.Google Scholar
Lehner, S.R., Rutte, C. & Taborsky, M. 2011. Rats benefit from winner and loser effects. Ethology, 117, 949–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehtonen, J. 2016. Multilevel selection in kin selection language. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31, 752–762.Google Scholar
Leigh, E.G.J. 2010. The evolution of mutualism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23, 2507–2528.Google Scholar
Leighton, G.M. & Vander Meiden, L. 2016. Sociable weavers increase cooperative nest construction after suffering aggression. PLoS One, 11, e0150953.Google Scholar
Leimar, O. & Hammerstein, P. 2001. Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268, 745–753.Google Scholar
Leimar, O. & Hammerstein, P. 2010. Cooperation for direct fitness benefits. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2619–2626.Google Scholar
Leimar, O., Austad, S. & Enquist, M. 1991. A test of the sequential assessment game: fighting in the bowl and doily spider Frontinella pyramitela. Evolution, 45, 862–874.Google Scholar
Leimgruber, K.L. 2018. The developmental emergence of direct reciprocity and its influence on prosocial behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 122–126.Google Scholar
Leimgruber, K.L., Ward, A.F., Widness, J., et al. 2014. Give what you get: capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and 4-year-old children pay forward positive and negative outcomes to conspecifics. PLoS One, 9, e87035.Google Scholar
Leinfelder, I., De Vries, H., Deleu, R. & Nelissen, M. 2001. Rank and grooming reciprocity among females in a mixed-sex group of captive hamadryas baboons. American Journal of Primatology, 55, 25–42.Google Scholar
Lenormand, T., Engelstädter, J., Johnston, S.E., Wijnker, E. & Haag, C.R. 2016. Evolutionary mysteries in meiosis. Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 371, 20160001.Google Scholar
Lessells, C.M. 1991. The evolution of life histories. In Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. (eds), Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, pp. 32–68. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Lessells, C.M. 2006. The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 361, 301–317.Google Scholar
Lessells, C.M. 2012. Sexual conflict. In Royle, N.J., Smiseth, P.T. & Kölliker, M. (eds), The Evolution of Parental Care, pp. 150–170. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lessells, C. & McNamara, J.M. 2012. Sexual conflict over parental investment in repeated bouts: negotiation reduces overall care. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 279, 1506–1514.Google Scholar
Levin, S.R., Gandon, S. & West, S.A. 2020. The social coevolution hypothesis for the origin of enzymatic cooperation. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4, 132–137.Google Scholar
Levitan, D.R. 1995. The ecology of fertilization in free-spawning invertebrates. In McEdward, L. (ed.), Ecology of Marine Invertebrate Larvae, pp. 123–156. Marine Science Series. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Levitan, D.R., Sewell, M.A. & Chia, F.S. 1991. Kinetics of fertilization in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus: interaction of gamete dilution, age, and contact time. The Biological Bulletin, 181, 371–378.Google Scholar
Levitis, D.A. & Lackey, L.B. 2011. A measure for describing and comparing postreproductive life span as a population trait. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 446–453.Google Scholar
Lewis, D.S.C. 1980. Mixed species broods in Lake Malawi cichlids: an alternative to the cuckoo theory. Copeia, 4, 874–875.Google Scholar
Lewis, S., Roberts, G., Harris, M.P., Prigmore, C. & Wanless, S. 2007. Fitness increases with partner and neighbour allopreening. Biology Letters, 3, 386–389.Google Scholar
Liao, X.Y., Rong, S. & Queller, D.C. 2015. Relatedness, conflict, and the evolution of eusociality. PLoS Biology, 13, e1002098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liebl, A.L., Nomano, F.Y., Browning, L.E. & Russell, A.F. 2016. Experimental evidence for fully additive care among male carers in the cooperatively breeding chestnut-crowned babbler. Animal Behaviour, 115, 47–53.Google Scholar
Lievin-Bazin, A., Pineaux, M., Le Covec, M., et al. 2019. Food sharing and affiliation: an experimental and longitudinal study in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus). Ethology, 125, 276–288.Google Scholar
Ligon, J.D. 1983. Cooperation and reciprocity in avian social systems. American Naturalist, 121, 366–384.Google Scholar
Ligon, J.D. & Burt, D.B. 2004. Evolutionary origins. In Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. (eds), Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, pp. 5–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ligon, J.D. & Ligon, S.H. 1978a. Communal breeding in green woodhoopoes as a case for reciprocity. Nature, 276, 496–498.Google Scholar
Ligon, J.D. & Ligon, S.H. 1978b. The communal social system of the green woodhoopoe in Kenya. Living Bird, 17, 159–197.Google Scholar
Ligon, J.D. & Ligon, S.H. 1983. Reciprocity in the green woodhoopoe (Phoeniculus purpureus). Animal Behaviour, 31, 480–489.Google Scholar
Ligon, J.D., Ligon, S.H. & Ford, H.A. 1991. An experimental study of the bases of male philopatry in the cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus. Ethology, 87, 134–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lill, J.T. & Marquis, R.J. 2007. Microhabitat manipulation: ecosystem engineering by shelter-building insects. In Cuddington, K., Byers, J.E., Wilson, W.G. & Hastings, A. (eds), Ecosystem Engineers: Plants to Protists, pp. 107–138. New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lima, M.R., Macedo, R.H., Muniz, L., Pacheco, A. & Graves, J.A. 2011. Group composition, mating system, and relatedness in the communally breeding guira cuckoo (Guira guira) in Central Brazil. The Auk, 128, 475–486.Google Scholar
Lima, S.L. & Dill, L.M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68, 619–640.Google Scholar
Limberger, D. 1983. Pairs and harems in a cichlid fish, Lamprologus brichardi. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 62, 115–144.Google Scholar
Lion, S. & Boots, M. 2010. Are parasites ‘prudent’ in space? Ecology Letters, 13, 1245–1255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lippold, S., Xu, H., Ko, A., et al. 2014. Human paternal and maternal demographic histories: insights from high-resolution Y chromosome and mtDNA sequences. Investigative Genetics, 5, 13.Google Scholar
Little, A.E.F. & Currie, C.R. 2007. Symbiotic complexity: discovery of a fifth symbiont in the attine ant–microbe symbiosis. Biology Letters, 3, 501–504.Google Scholar
Loiselle, B.A., Blake, J.G., Durães, R., Ryder, T.B. & Tori, W. 2007. Environmental and spatial segregation of leks among six co-occurring species of manakins (Pipridae) in eastern Ecuador. The Auk, 124, 420–431.Google Scholar
Loke, L.H.L., Ladle, R.J., Bouma, T.J. & Todd, P.A. 2015. Creating complex habitats for restoration and reconciliation. Ecological Engineering, 77, 307–313.Google Scholar
LoPresti, E.F. & Morse, D.H. 2013. Costly leaf shelters protect moth pupae from parasitoids. Arthropod–Plant Interactions, 7, 445–453.Google Scholar
Lopuch, S. & Popik, P. 2011. Cooperative behavior of laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus) in an instrumental task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125, 250–253.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. 1963. Das Sogenannte Böse. Zur Naturgeschichte Der Aggression. Vienna: Borotha-Schoeler.Google Scholar
Losin, N., Drury, J.P., Peiman, K.S., Storch, C. & Grether, G.F. 2016. The ecological and evolutionary stability of interspecific territoriality. Ecology Letters, 19, 260–267.Google Scholar
Lott, D.F. 1991. Intraspecific Variation in the Social Systems of Wild Vertebrates (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loukola, O.J., Perry, C.J., Coscos, L. & Chittka, L. 2017. Bumblebees show cognitive flexibility by improving on an observed complex behavior. Science, 355, 833–836.Google Scholar
Løvlie, H., Gillingham, M.A., Worley, K., Pizzari, T. & Richardson, D.S. 2013. Cryptic female choice favours sperm from major histocompatibility complex-dissimilar males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 280, 20131296.Google Scholar
Lubin, Y. & Bilde, T. 2007. The evolution of sociality in spiders. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 37, 83–145.Google Scholar
Lucherini, M. & Birochio, D.E. 1997. Lack of aggression and avoidance between vicuna and guanaco herds grazing in the same Andean habitat. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 32, 72–75.Google Scholar
Lukas, D. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2012a. The evolution of mammalian societies: cooperative breeding monogamy and polytocy. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 279, 4065–4070.Google Scholar
Lukas, D. & Clutton-Brock, T. 2012b. Cooperative breeding and monogamy in mammalian societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 279, 2151–2156.Google Scholar
Lukas, D. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2013. The evolution of social monogamy in mammals. Science, 341, 526–530.Google Scholar
Lukas, D. & Clutton-Brock, T. 2017. Climate and the distribution of cooperative breeding in mammals. Royal Society Open Science, 4, 160897.Google Scholar
Lutermann, H., Verburgt, L. & Rendigs, A. 2010. Resting and nesting in a small mammal: sleeping sites as a limiting resource for female grey mouse lemurs. Animal Behaviour, 79, 1211–1219.Google Scholar
Lüscher, M. 1961. Social control of polymorphism in termites. In Kennedy, J.S. (ed.), Insect Polymorphism, pp. 57–67. London: Royal Entomological Society.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Maan, M.E. & Taborsky, M. 2007. Sexual conflict over breeding substrate causes female expulsion and offspring loss in a cichlid fish. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 302–308.Google Scholar
MacColl, A.D. & Hatchwell, B.J. 2004. Determinants of lifetime fitness in a cooperative breeder, the long-tailed tit Aegithalos caudatus. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73, 1137–1148.Google Scholar
MacDougall-Shackleton, S.A. 2011. The levels of analysis revisited. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 366, 2076–2085.Google Scholar
Mace, R. & Alvergne, A. 2012. Female reproductive competition within families in rural Gambia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 279, 2219–2227.Google Scholar
Macedo, R.H. & Bianchi, C.A. 1997. Communal breeding in tropical Guira cuckoos Guira guira: sociality in the absence of a saturated habitat. Journal of Avian Biology, 28, 207–215.Google Scholar
Machanda, Z.P., Gilby, I.C. & Wrangham, R.W. 2014. Mutual grooming among adult male chimpanzees: the immediate investment hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 87, 165–174.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, A., Reynolds, J.D., Brown, V.J. & Sutherland, W.J. 1995. Variation in male mating success on leks. The American Naturalist, 145, 633–652.Google Scholar
MacLeod, K. & Clutton-Brock, T. 2015. Low costs of allonursing in meerkats: mitigation by behavioral change? Behavioral Ecology, 26, 697–705.Google Scholar
MacLeod, K.J. & Lukas, D. 2014. Revisiting non-offspring nursing: allonursing evolves when the costs are low. Biology Letters, 10, 20140378.Google Scholar
MacLeod, K.J., Nielsen, J.F. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2013. Factors predicting the frequency, likelihood and duration of allonursing in the cooperatively breeding meerkat. Animal Behaviour, 86, 1059–1067.Google Scholar
Madden, J.R., Lowe, T.J., Fuller, H.V., et al. 2004. Neighbouring male spotted bowerbirds are not related, but do maraud each other. Animal Behaviour, 68, 751–758.Google Scholar
Madden, J.R. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2009. Manipulating grooming by decreasing ectoparasite load causes unpredicted changes in antagonism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276, 1263–1268.Google Scholar
Madgwick, P.G., Belcher, L.J. & Wolf, J.B. 2019. Greenbeard genes: theory and reality. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34, 1092–1103.Google Scholar
Magnus, D.B.E. 1967. Zur Ökologie sedimentbewohnender Alpheus garnelen (Decapoda, Natantia) des Roten Meeres. Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 15, 506.Google Scholar
Magrath, R.D. & Whittingham, L.A. 1997. Subordinate males are more likely to help if unrelated to the breeding female in cooperatively breeding white-browed scrubwrens. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 185–192.Google Scholar
Magurran, A.E. 1990. The adaptive significance of schooling as an anti-predator defence in fish. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 27, 51–66.Google Scholar
Maher, C.R. & Lott, D.F. 2000. A review of ecological determinants of territoriality within vertebrate species. American Midland Naturalist, 143, 1–29.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, M.C. 2011. The use of nestboxes by roosting birds during the non-breeding season: a review of the costs and benefits. Ardea, 99, 167–176.Google Scholar
Majolo, B., Schino, G. & Aureli, F. 2012. The relative prevalence of direct, indirect and generalized reciprocity in macaque grooming exchanges. Animal Behaviour, 83, 763–771.Google Scholar
Manica, A., Fayet, A.L., Hinde, C.A., et al. 2013. Reciprocity and conditional cooperation between great tit parents. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 216–222.Google Scholar
Manser, M.B. 2001. The acoustic structure of suricates’ alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268, 2315–2324.Google Scholar
Manson, J.H., Navarrete, C.D., Silk, J.B. & Perry, S. 2004. Time-matched grooming in female primates? New analyses from two species. Animal Behaviour, 67, 493–500.Google Scholar
Marconato, A. & Bisazza, A. 1986. Males whose nests contain eggs are preferred by female Cottus gobio L.(Pisces, Cottidae). Animal Behaviour, 34, 1580–1582.Google Scholar
Marler, P., Dufty, A. & Pickert, R. 1986a. Vocal communication in the domestic chicken: I. Does a sender communicate information about the quality of a food referent to a receiver? Animal Behaviour, 34, 188–193.Google Scholar
Marler, P., Dufty, A. & Pickert, R. 1986b. Vocal communication in the domestic chicken: II. Is a sender sensitive to the presence and nature of a receiver? Animal Behaviour, 34, 194–198.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F.W. 2004. Marital residence among foragers. Current Anthropology, 45, 277–284.Google Scholar
Marshall, H.H., Sanderson, J.L., Mwanghuya, F., et al. 2016. Variable ecological conditions promote male helping by changing banded mongoose group composition. Behavioral Ecology, 27, 978–987.Google Scholar
Marshall, J.A.R. 2011. Group selection and kin selection: formally equivalent approaches. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26, 325–332.Google Scholar
Martel, G. 1996. Growth rate and influence of predation risk on territoriality in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 53, 660–669.Google Scholar
Martel, G. & Dill, L.M. 1993. Feeding and aggressive behaviours in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) under chemically-mediated risk of predation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 32, 365–370.Google Scholar
Martin, E. & Taborsky, M. 1997. Alternative male mating tactics in a cichlid, Pelvicachromis pulcher: a comparison of reproductive effort and success. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 311–319.Google Scholar
Martin, S.J., Beekman, M., Wossler, T.C. & Ratnieks, F.L.W. 2002. Parasitic Cape honeybee workers, Apis mellifera capensis, evade policing. Nature, 415, 163–165.Google Scholar
Marzluff, J.M. & Balda, R.P. 1990. Pinyon jays: making the best of a bad situation by helping. In Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. (eds), Cooperative Breeding in Vertebrates: Studies of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, pp. 199–237. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marzluff, J.M. & Heinrich, B. 1991. Foraging by common ravens in the presence and absence of territory holders: an experimental analysis of social foraging. Animal Behaviour, 42, 755–770.Google Scholar
Marzluff, J.M., Heinrich, B. & Marzluff, C.S. 1996. Raven roosts are mobile information centres. Animal Behaviour, 51, 89–103.Google Scholar
Maslow, A.H. 1936. The rôle of dominance in the social and sexual behavior of infra-human primates: I. observations at vilas park zoo. Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 48, 261–277.Google Scholar
Masse, A. & Cote, S.D. 2013. Spatiotemporal variations in resources affect activity and movement patterns of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) at high density. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 91, 252–263.Google Scholar
Massen, J.J.M., Ritter, C. & Bugnyar, T. 2015. Tolerance and reward equity predict cooperation in ravens (Corvus corax). Scientific Reports, 5, 15021.Google Scholar
Masuda, N. 2007. Participation costs dismiss the advantage of heterogeneous networks in evolution of cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 1815–1821.Google Scholar
Masuda, N. 2011. Clustering in large networks does not promote upstream reciprocity. PLoS One, 6, e25190.Google Scholar
Masuda, N. 2012. Evolution of cooperation driven by zealots. Scientific Reports, 2, 646.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, K. & Kohda, M. 2004. Territorial defense against various food competitors in the Tanganyikan benthophagous cichlid Neolamprologus tetracanthus. Ichthyological Research, 51, 354–359.Google Scholar
Matsuura, K. 2012. Multifunctional queen pheromone and maintenance of reproductive harmony in termite colonies. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 38, 746–754.Google Scholar
Mattey, S.N. & Smiseth, P.T. 2015. No inbreeding avoidance by female burying beetles regardless of whether they encounter males simultaneously or sequentially. Ethology, 121, 1031–1038.Google Scholar
May, R.M., Conway, G.R., Hassell, M.P. & Southwood, T.R.E. 1974. Time delays, density-dependence and single-species oscillations. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 747–770.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1974. The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47, 209–221.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1977. Parental investment: a prospective analysis. Animal Behaviour, 25, 1–9.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1982a. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1982b. The evolution of social behaviour – a classification of models. In Current Problems in Sociobiology, pp. 29–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1988. Evolutionary progress and levels of selection. In Nitecki, M.H. (ed.), Evolutionary Progress, pp. 219–230. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. & Harper, D. 2003. Animal Signals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. & Parker, G.A. 1976. The logic of asymmetric contests. Animal Behaviour, 24, 159–175.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. & Price, G.R. 1973. The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246, 15–18.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. & Ridpath, M.G. 1972. Wife sharing in the Tasmaninan native hen, Tribonyx mortierii – a case of kin selection? American Naturalist, 106, 447–452.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. & Szathmary, E. 1995. The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, D.B. 1993a. Delayed plumage maturation and orderly queues for status: a manakin mannequin experiment. Ethology, 94, 31–45.Google Scholar
McDonald, D.B. 1993b. Demographic consequences of sexual selection in the long-tailed manakin. Behavioral Ecology, 4, 297–309.Google Scholar
McDonald, D.B. 2009. Young-boy networks without kin clusters in a lek-mating manakin. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63, 1029–1034.Google Scholar
McDonald, D.B. & Potts, W.K. 1994. Cooperative display and relatedness among males in a lek-mating bird. Science, 266, 1030–1032.Google Scholar
McDonald, P.G. 2014. Cooperative breeding beyond kinship: why else do helpers help? Emu, 114, 91–96.Google Scholar
McDonald, P.G. & Wright, J. 2011. Bell miner provisioning calls are more similar among relatives and are used by helpers at the nest to bias their effort towards kin. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278, 3403–3411.Google Scholar
McDonald, P.G., Kazem, A.J.N., Clarke, M.F. & Wright, J. 2008a. Helping as a signal: does removal of potential audiences alter helper behavior in the bell miner? Behav. Ecol., 19, 1047–1055.Google Scholar
McDonald, P.G., Te Marvelde, L., Kazem, A.J. & Wright, J. 2008b. Helping as a signal and the effect of a potential audience during provisioning visits in a cooperative bird. Animal Behaviour, 75, 1319–1330.Google Scholar
McEachern, M.B., Eadie, J.M. & Van Vuren, D.H. 2007. Local genetic structure and relatedness in a solitary mammal, Neotoma fuscipes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 1459–1469.Google Scholar
McFall-Ngai, M. 2014. Divining the essence of symbiosis: insights from the squid–Vibrio model. PLoS Biology, 12, e1001783.Google Scholar
McGregor, P.K. 2005. Animal Communication Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McInnes, A.M., McGeorge, C., Ginsberg, S., Pichegru, L. & Pistorius, P.A. 2017. Group foraging increases foraging efficiency in a piscivorous diver, the African penguin. Royal Society Open Science, 4.Google Scholar
McKaye, K.R. 1977. Defense of a predator’s young by a herbivorous fish: an unusual strategy. The American Naturalist, 111, 301–315.Google Scholar
McKaye, K.R. 1979. Defense of a predator’s young revisited. The American Naturalist, 114, 595–601.Google Scholar
McKaye, K.R. 1985. Cichlid–catfish mutualistic defense of young in Lake Malawi, Africa. Oecologia, 66, 358–363.Google Scholar
McKaye, K.R. & McKaye, N.M. 1977. Communal care and kidnapping of young by parental cichlids. Evolution, 31, 674–681.Google Scholar
McKaye, K.R. & Oliver, M.K. 1980. Geometry of a selfish school: defence of cichlid young by bagrid catfish in Lake Malawi, Africa. Animal Behaviour, 28, 1287.Google Scholar
McKaye, K.R., Mughogho, D.E. & Lovullo, T.J. 1992. Formation of the selfish school. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 35, 213–218.Google Scholar
McKinnon, L., Gilchrist, H.G. & Scribner, K.T. 2006. Genetic evidence for kin-based female social structure in common eiders (Somateria mollissima). Behavioral Ecology, 17, 614–621.Google Scholar
McMahon, B.F. & Evans, R.M. 1992. Foraging strategies of American white pelicans. Behaviour, 120, 69–89.Google Scholar
McNamara, J.M. 2013. Towards a richer evolutionary game theory. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10, 20130544.Google Scholar
McNamara, J.M. & Houston, A.I. 2002. Credible threats and promises. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 357, 1607–1616.Google Scholar
McNamara, J.M. & Houston, A.I. 2009. Integrating function and mechanism. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 670–675.Google Scholar
McNamara, J.M., Gasson, C.E. & Houston, A.I. 1999. Incorporating rules for responding into evolutionary games. Nature, 401, 368–371.Google Scholar
McNamara, J.M., Houston, A.I., Barta, Z. & Osorno, J.L. 2003. Should young ever be better off with one parent than with two? Behavioral Ecology, 14, 301–310.Google Scholar
McNamara, J.M., Barta, Z., Fromhage, L. & Houston, A.I. 2008. The coevolution of choosiness and cooperation. Nature, 451, 189–192.Google Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. & Cook, J.M. 2001. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.Google Scholar
McRae, S.B. 1996. Family values: costs and benefits of communal nesting in the moorhen. Animal Behaviour, 52, 225–245.Google Scholar
Mech, L.D. 2003. The Wolves of Denali. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mehlis, M., Bakker, T.C. & Frommen, J.G. 2008. Smells like sib spirit: kin recognition in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) is mediated by olfactory cues. Animal Cognition, 11, 643–650.Google Scholar
Mehlis, M., Bakker, T.C., Engqvist, L. & Frommen, J.G. 2010. To eat or not to eat: egg-based assessment of paternity triggers fine-tuned decisions about filial cannibalism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2627–2635.Google Scholar
Mehlis, M., Thunken, T., Bakker, T. & Frommen, J. 2015. Quantification acuity in spontaneous shoaling decisions of three-spined sticklebacks. Animal Cognition, 18, 1125–1131.Google Scholar
Meise, K., von Engelhardt, N., Forcada, J. & Hoffman, J.I. 2016. Offspring hormones reflect the maternal prenatal social environment: potential for foetal programming? PLoS One, 11, e0145352.Google Scholar
Melis, A.P., Hare, B. & Tomasello, M. 2008. Do chimpanzees reciprocate received favours? Animal Behaviour, 76, 951–962.Google Scholar
Melis, A.P., Hare, B. & Tomasello, M. 2009. Chimpanzees coordinate in a negotiation game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 381–392.Google Scholar
Mendres, K.A. & de Waal, F.B.M. 2000. Capuchins do cooperate: the advantage of an intuitive task. Animal Behaviour, 60, 523–529.Google Scholar
Mennella, J.A., Blumberg, M.S., McClintock, M.K. & Moltz, H. 1990. Inter-litter competition and communal nursing among Norway rats: advantages of birth synchrony. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 183–190.Google Scholar
Mesterton-Gibbons, M. & Dugatkin, L.A. 1992. Cooperation among unrelated individuals – evolutionary factors. Quarterly Review of Biology, 67, 267–281.Google Scholar
Metheny, J.D., Kalcounis-Rueppell, M.C., Bondo, K.J. & Brigham, R.M. 2008. A genetic analysis of group movement in an isolated population of tree-roosting bats. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2265–2272.Google Scholar
Meunier, J. 2015. Social immunity and the evolution of group living in insects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 370, 20140102.Google Scholar
Meunier, J., West, S.A. & Chapuisat, M. 2008. Split sex ratios in the social Hymenoptera: a meta-analysis. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 382–390.Google Scholar
Meunier, J., Delaplace, L. & Chapuisat, M. 2010. Reproductive conflicts and egg discrimination in a socially polymorphic ant. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64, 1655–1663.Google Scholar
Michael, R.P. & Zumpe, D. 1993. A review of hormonal factors influencing the sexual and aggressive behavior of macaques. American Journal of Primatology, 30, 213–241.Google Scholar
Michod, R.E. 2000. Darwinian Dynamics: Evolutionary Transitions in Fitness and Individuality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mielke, A., Crockford, C. & Wittig, R.M. 2019. Snake alarm calls as a public good in sooty mangabeys. Animal Behaviour, 158, 201–209.Google Scholar
Milinski, M. 1977. Experiments on the selection by predators against spatial oddity of their prey. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 43, 311–325.Google Scholar
Milinski, M. 1979. An evolutionarily stable feeding strategy in sticklebacks 1. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 51, 36–40.Google Scholar
Milinski, M. 2016. Reputation, a universal currency for human social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150100.Google Scholar
Milinski, M. & Wedekind, C. 1998. Working memory constrains human cooperation in the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 13755–13758.Google Scholar
Milinski, M., Pfluger, D., Kulling, D. & Kettler, R. 1990. Do sticklebacks cooperate repeatedly in reciprocal pairs? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 17–21.Google Scholar
Milinski, M., Semmann, D. & Krambeck, H.J. 2002. Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Nature, 415, 424–426.Google Scholar
Mills, A.D., Crawford, L.L., Domjan, M. & Faure, J.M. 1997. The behavior of the Japanese or domestic quail Coturnix japonica. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 21, 261–281.Google Scholar
Mitani, J.C. 2006. Reciprocal exchange in chimpanzees and other primates. In Kappeler, P.M. & van Schaik, C.P. (eds), Cooperation in Primates: Mechanisms and Evolution, pp. 101–113. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Mitani, J.C. & Watts, D.P. 1999. Demographic influences on the hunting behavior of chimpanzees. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 109, 439–454.Google Scholar
Mitani, J.C. & Watts, D.P. 2001. Why do chimpanzees hunt and share meat? Animal Behaviour, 61, 915–924.Google Scholar
Mitani, J.C., Watts, D.P. & Amsler, S.J. 2010. Lethal intergroup aggression leads to territorial expansion in wild chimpanzees. Current Biology, 20, R507–R508.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J.S., Jutzeler, E., Heg, D. & Taborsky, M. 2009a. Dominant members of cooperatively-breeding groups adjust their behaviour in response to the sexes of their subordinates. Behaviour, 146, 1665–1686.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J.S., Jutzeler, E., Heg, D. & Taborsky, M. 2009b. Gender differences in the costs that subordinate group members impose on dominant males in a cooperative breeder. Ethology, 115, 1162–1174.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J.S., Ocana, S.W. & Taborsky, M. 2014. Male and female shell-brooding cichlids prefer different shell characteristics. Animal Behaviour, 98, 131–137.Google Scholar
Mitri, S., Floreano, D. & Keller, L. 2009. The evolution of information suppression in communicating robots with conflicting interests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 15786–15790.Google Scholar
Mitteldorf, J. & Wilson, D.S. 2000. Population viscosity and the evolution of altruism. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 204, 481–496.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, E., Seguchi, A., Takahashi, N., Motai, A. & Izawa, E.I. 2020. Different patterns of allopreening in the same-sex and opposite-sex interactions of juvenile large-billed crows (Corvus macrorhynchos). Ethology, 126, 195–206.Google Scholar
Mock, D.W. & Parker, G.A. 1997. The Evolution of Sibling Rivalry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mock, D.W., Dugas, M.B. & Strickler, S.A. 2011. Honest begging: expanding from signal of need. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 909–917.Google Scholar
Moczek, A.P. & Emlen, D.J. 2000. Male horn dimorphism in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favour alternative phenotypes? Animal Behaviour, 59, 459–466.Google Scholar
Moffett, M.W. 2012. Supercolonies of billions in an invasive ant: What is a society? Behavioral Ecology, 23, 925–933.Google Scholar
Molbo, D., Machado, C.A., Herre, E.A. & Keller, L. 2004. Inbreeding and population structure in two pairs of cryptic fig wasp species. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1613–1623.Google Scholar
Molesti, S. & Majolo, B. 2017. Evidence of direct reciprocity, but not of indirect and generalized reciprocity, in the grooming exchanges of wild Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). American Journal of Primatology, 79.Google Scholar
Monaghan, P. & Metcalfe, N.B. 1985. Group foraging in wild brown hares: effects of resource distribution and social status. Animal Behaviour, 33, 993–999.Google Scholar
Monnin, T. & Peeters, C. 1999. Dominance hierarchy and reproductive conflicts among subordinates in a monogynous queenless ant. Behavioral Ecology, 10, 323–332.Google Scholar
Moody, M. 2008. Serial reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Sociological Theory, 26, 130–151.Google Scholar
Moore, J.C., Loggenberg, A. & Greeff, J.M. 2005. Kin competition promotes dispersal in a male pollinating fig wasp. Biology Letters, 2, 17–19.Google Scholar
Mooring, M.S. 1995. The effect of tick challenge on grooming rate by impala. Animal Behaviour, 50, 377–392.Google Scholar
Mooring, M.S. & Hart, B.L. 1995. Costs of allogrooming in impala – distraction from vigilance. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1414–1416.Google Scholar
Mooring, M.S. & Hart, B.L. 1997. Reciprocal allogrooming in wild impala lambs. Ethology, 103, 665–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooring, M.S. & Samuel, W.M. 1999. Premature loss of winter hair in free-ranging moose (Alces alces) infested with winter ticks (Dermacentor albipictus) is correlated with grooming rate. Canadian Journal of Zoology – Revue Canadienne de Zoologie, 77, 148–156.Google Scholar
Morand-Ferron, J. & Quinn, J.L. 2011. Larger groups of passerines are more efficient problem solvers in the wild. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 15898–15903.Google Scholar
Moreira, J., Vukov, J., Sousa, C., et al. 2013. Individual memory and the emergence of cooperation. Animal Behaviour, 85, 233–239.Google Scholar
Morgan, L.D. & Fine, M.L. 2020. Agonistic behavior in juvenile blue catfish Ictalurus furcatus. Journal of Ethology, 38, 29–40.Google Scholar
Mori, S. 1995. Factors associated with and fitness effects of nest-raiding in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, in a natural situation. Behaviour, 132, 1011–1023.Google Scholar
Morris, B.E.L., Henneberger, R., Hube, H. & Moissl-Eichinger, C. 2013. Microbial syntrophy: interaction for the common good. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 37, 384–406.Google Scholar
Morris, D.W. 1996. Coexistence of specialist and generalist rodents via habitat selection. Ecology, 77, 2352–2364.Google Scholar
Morrow, E.H. & Arnqvist, G. 2003. Costly traumatic insemination and a female counter-adaptation in bed bugs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270, 2377–2381.Google Scholar
Morse, D.H. 1978. Structure and foraging patterns of flocks of tits and associated species in an English woodland during the winter. Ibis, 120, 298–312.Google Scholar
Mottley, K. & Giraldeau, L.A. 2000. Experimental evidence that group foragers can converge on predicted producer–scrounger equilibria. Animal Behaviour, 60, 341–350.Google Scholar
Mueller, C.A. & Cant, M.A. 2010. Imitation and traditions in wild banded mongooses. Current Biology, 20, 1171–1175.Google Scholar
Mueller, U.G., Rehner, S.A. & Schultz, T.R. 1998. The evolution of agriculture in ants. Science, 281, 2034–2038.Google Scholar
Mueller, U.G., Gerardo, N.M., Aanen, D.K., Six, D.L. & Schultz, T.R. 2005. The evolution of agriculture in insects. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36, 563–595.Google Scholar
Mulder, R.A. & Langmore, N.E. 1993. Dominant males punish helpers for temporary defection in the superb fairy wren. Animal Behaviour, 45, 830–833.Google Scholar
Mulder, R.A., Dunn, P.O., Cockburn, A., Cohen, K.A.L. & Howell, M.J. 1994. Helpers liberate female fairy-wrens from constraints on extra-pair mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 255, 223–229.Google Scholar
Muller, C.A. & Manser, M.B. 2007. ‘Nasty neighbours’ rather than ‘dear enemies’ in a social carnivore. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 959–965.Google Scholar
Muller, C.A. & Bell, M.B.V. 2009. Kidnapping and infanticide between groups of banded mongooses. Mammalian Biology, 74, 315–318.Google Scholar
Mumme, R.L. 1992. Do helpers increase reproductive success? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 31, 319–328.Google Scholar
Mumme, R.L., Koenig, W.D. & Pitelka, F.A. 1983. Reproductive competition in the communal acorn woodpecker – sisters destroy each other’s eggs. Nature, 306, 583–584.Google Scholar
Mumme, R.L., Koenig, W.D. & Ratnieks, F.L. 1989. Helping behaviour, reproductive value, and the future component of indirect fitness. Animal Behaviour, 38, 331–343.Google Scholar
Myrberg, A.A. Jr & Thresher, R.E. 1974. Interspecific aggression and its relevance to the concept of territoriality in reef fishes. American Zoologist, 14, 81–96.Google Scholar
Naef, J. & Taborsky, M. 2020a. Commodity-specific punishment for experimentally induced defection in cooperatively breeding fish. Royal Society Open Science, 7, 191808.Google Scholar
Naef, J. & Taborsky, M. 2020b. Punishment controls helper defence against egg predators but not against predators of adults in cooperatively breeding cichlids. Animal Behaviour, 168, 137–147.Google Scholar
Nagoshi, M. & Gashagaza, M.M. 1988. Growth of the larvae of a Tanganyikan cichlid, Lamprologus attenuatus, under parental care. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology, 35, 392–395.Google Scholar
Nakamaru, M., Matsuda, H. & Iwasa, Y. 1997. The evolution of cooperation in a lattice-structured population. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 184, 65–81.Google Scholar
Nakazawa, T. & Yamamura, N. 2009. Theoretical considerations for the maintenance of interspecific brood care by a Nicaraguan cichlid fish: behavioral plasticity and spatial structure. Journal of Ethology, 27, 67–73.Google Scholar
Nam, K.B., Simeoni, M., Sharp, S.P. & Hatchwell, B.J. 2010. Kinship affects investment by helpers in a cooperatively breeding bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 3299–3306.Google Scholar
Nattrass, S., Croft, D.P., Ellis, S., et al. 2019. Postreproductive killer whale grandmothers improve the survival of their grandoffspring. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116, 26669–26673.Google Scholar
Neems, R.M., Lazarus, J. & Mclachlan, A.J. 1992. Swarming behavior in male chironomid midges: a cost–benefit analysis. Behavioral Ecology, 3, 285–290.Google Scholar
Neff, B.D. 2003. Decisions about parental care in response to perceived paternity. Nature, 422, 716.Google Scholar
Neff, B.D. & Sherman, P.W. 2003. Nestling recognition via direct cues by parental male bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Animal Cognition, 6, 87–92.Google Scholar
Neff, B.D. & Svensson, E.I. 2013. Polyandry and alternative mating tactics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 368, 20120045.Google Scholar
Nelson, R.M. & Greeff, J.M. 2009. Evolution of the scale and manner of brother competition in pollinating fig wasps. Animal Behaviour, 77, 693–700.Google Scholar
Neukom, R., Barboza, L.A., Erb, M.P., et al. 2019. Consistent multi-decadal variability in global temperature reconstructions and simulations over the Common Era. Nature Geoscience, 12, 643–649.Google Scholar
Nevo, E. 1979. Adaptive convergence and divergence of subterranean mammals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 10, 269–308.Google Scholar
Newby, J., Darden, T., Bassos-Hull, K. & Shedlock, A.M. 2014. Kin structure and social organization in the spotted eagle ray, Aetobatus narinari, off coastal Sarasota, FL. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 97, 1057–1065.Google Scholar
Newton-Fisher, N.E. & Lee, P.C. 2011. Grooming reciprocity in wild male chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 81, 439–446.Google Scholar
Nichols, H.J., Jordan, N.R., Jamie, G.A., Cant, M.A. & Hoffman, J.I. 2012a. Fine-scale spatiotemporal patterns of genetic variation reflect budding dispersal coupled with strong natal philopatry in a cooperatively breeding mammal. Molecular Ecology, 21, 5348–5362.Google Scholar
Nichols, H.J., Amos, W., Bell, M.B., et al. 2012b. Food availability shapes patterns of helping effort in a cooperative mongoose. Animal Behaviour, 83, 1377–1385.Google Scholar
Nichols, H.J., Cant, M.A. & Sanderson, J.L. 2015. Adjustment of costly extra-group paternity according to inbreeding risk in a cooperative mammal. Behavioral Ecology, 26, 1486–1494.Google Scholar
Nicholson, A.J. 1954. An outline of the dynamics of animal populations. Australian Journal of Zoology, 2, 9–65.Google Scholar
Nicola, G.G., Ayllon, D., Elvira, B. & Almodovar, A. 2016. Territorial and foraging behaviour of juvenile Mediterranean trout under changing conditions of food and competitors. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 73, 990–998.Google Scholar
Nielsen, C.L.R., Gates, R.J. & Parker, P.G. 2006. Intraspecific nest parasitism of wood ducks in natural cavities: comparisons with nest boxes. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 70, 835–843.Google Scholar
Nielsen, J.F., English, S., Goodall-Copestake, W.P., et al. 2012. Inbreeding and inbreeding depression of early life traits in a cooperative mammal. Molecular Ecology, 21, 2788–2804.Google Scholar
Niklas, K.J., Cobb, E.D. & Kutschera, U. 2014. Did meiosis evolve before sex and the evolution of eukaryotic life cycles? Bioessays, 36, 1091–1101.Google Scholar
Noë, R. 1990. A veto game played by baboons: a challenge to the use of the prisoner’s dilemma as a paradigm for reciprocity and cooperation. Animal Behavior, 39, 78–90.Google Scholar
Noë, R. 2006. Cooperation experiments: coordination through communication versus acting apart together. Animal Behaviour, 71, 1–18.Google Scholar
Noë, R. & Hammerstein, P. 1994. Biological markets – supply-and-demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 35, 1–11.Google Scholar
Noë, R. & Hammerstein, P. 1995. Biological markets. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10, 336–339.Google Scholar
Noë, R., Vanschaik, C.P. & Vanhooff, J.A.R.A. 1991. The market effect – an explanation for pay-off asymmetries among collaborating animals. Ethology, 87, 97–118.Google Scholar
Noël, M.V., Grant, J.W. & Carrigan, J.G. 2005. Effects of competitor-to-resource ratio on aggression and size variation within groups of convict cichlids. Animal Behaviour, 69, 1157–1163.Google Scholar
Nomano, F.Y., Browning, L.E., Savage, J.L., et al. 2015. Unrelated helpers neither signal contributions nor suffer retribution in chestnut-crowed babblers. Behavioral Ecology, 26, 986–995.Google Scholar
Nonacs, P. 2011. Kinship, greenbeards, and runaway social selection in the evolution of social insect cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 10808–10815.Google Scholar
Normark, B.B., Jordal, B.H. & Farrell, B.D. 1999. Origin of a haplodiploid beetle lineage. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 266, 2253–2259.Google Scholar
Norris, D.M. & Chu, H.-M. 1985. Xyleborus ferrugineus. In Singh, P. & Moore, R.F. (eds), Handbook of Insect Rearing, Vol. I, pp. 303–315. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Nowak, M.A. 2006. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314, 1560–1563.Google Scholar
Nowak, M.A. & May, R.M. 1992. Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature, 359, 826–829.Google Scholar
Nowak, M.A. & Roch, S. 2007. Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 605–610.Google Scholar
Nowak, M.A. & Sigmund, K. 1992. Tit-for-tat in heterogeneous populations. Nature, 355, 250–253.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. & Sigmund, K. 1993. A strategy of win stay, lose shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the prisoners-dilemma game. Nature, 364, 56–58.Google Scholar
Nowak, M.A. & Sigmund, K. 1998a. The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 194, 561–574.Google Scholar
Nowak, M.A. & Sigmund, K. 1998b. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 393, 573–577.Google Scholar
Nowak, M.A. & Sigmund, K. 2005. Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437, 1291–1298.Google Scholar
Nowak, M.A., Tarnita, C.E. & Wilson, E.O. 2010a. The evolution of eusociality. Nature, 466, 1057–1062.Google Scholar
Nowak, M.A., Tarnita, C.E. & Antal, T. 2010b. Evolutionary dynamics in structured populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 365, 19–30.Google Scholar
Nuotcla, J.A., Taborsky, M. & Biedermann, P.H.W. 2014. The importance of blocking the gallery entrance in the ambrosia beetle Xyleborinus saxesenii ratzeburg (Coleoptera; Scolytinae). Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Allgemeine und Angewandte Entomologie, 19, 203–207.Google Scholar
Nuotclá, J.A., Biedermann, P.H. & Taborsky, M. 2019. Pathogen defence is a potential driver of social evolution in ambrosia beetles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 286, 20192332.Google Scholar
Nuotclá, J.A., Diehl, J.M.C. & Taborsky, M. 2021. Habitat quality determines dispersal decisions and fitness in a beetle–fungus mutualism. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 242.Google Scholar
Nutt, K.J. 2008. A comparison of techniques for assessing dispersal behaviour in gundis: revealing dispersal patterns in the absence of observed dispersal behaviour. Molecular Ecology, 17, 3541–3556.Google Scholar
O’Brien, S., Luján, A.M., Paterson, S., Cant, M.A. & Buckling, A. 2017. Adaptation to public goods cheats in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 284, 20171089.Google Scholar
O’Connor, C.M., Reddon, A.R., Ligocki, I.Y., et al. 2015. Motivation but not body size influences territorial contest dynamics in a wild cichlid fish. Animal Behaviour, 107, 19–29.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, S. 2001. Worker biting interactions and task performance in a swarm-founding eusocial wasp (Polybia occidentalis, Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behavioral Ecology, 12, 353–359.Google Scholar
Ochi, H. & Yanagisawa, Y. 1996. Interspecific brood-mixing in Tanganyikan cichlids. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 45, 141–149.Google Scholar
Ochi, H. & Yanagisawa, Y. 2005. Farming-out of offspring is a predominantly male tactic in a biparental mouthbrooding cichlid Perrisodus mircolepis. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 73, 335–340.Google Scholar
Ochi, H., Yanagisawa, Y. & Omori, K. 1995. Intraspecific brood-mixing of the cichlid fish Perissodus microlepis in Lake Tanganyika. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 43, 201–206.Google Scholar
Ochi, H., Onchiand, T. & Yanagisawa, Y. 2001. Alloparental care between catfishes in Lake Tanganyika. Journal of Fish Biology, 59, 1279–1286.Google Scholar
Ohtsuki, H. 2018. Evolutionary dynamics of coordinated cooperation. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 62.Google Scholar
Ohtsuki, H. & Iwasa, Y. 2004. How should we define goodness? Reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 231, 107–120.Google Scholar
Ohtsuki, H. & Iwasa, Y. 2006. The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 239, 435–444.Google Scholar
Ohtsuki, H., Hauert, C., Lieberman, E. & Nowak, M.A. 2006. A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature, 441, 502–505.Google Scholar
Oi, C.A., Van Oystaeyen, A., Oliveira, R.C., et al. 2015a. Dual effect of wasp queen pheromone in regulating insect sociality. Current Biology, 25, 1638–1640.Google Scholar
Oi, C.A., van Zweden, J.S., Oliveira, R.C., et al. 2015b. The origin and evolution of social insect queen pheromones: novel hypotheses and outstanding problems. Bioessays, 37, 808–821.Google Scholar
Oka, R. & Kusimba, C.M. 2008. The archaeology of trading systems, part 1: towards a new trade synthesis. Journal of Archaeological Research, 16, 339–395.Google Scholar
Okasha, S. 2005. Altruism, group selection and correlated interaction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56, 703–725.Google Scholar
Okasha, S. 2012. Social justice, genomic justice and the veil of ignorance: Harsanyi meets Mendel. Economics & Philosophy, 28, 43–71.Google Scholar
Okasha, S. 2016. The relation between kin and multilevel selection: an approach using causal graphs. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67, 435–470.Google Scholar
Okasha, S. & Paternotte, C. 2012. Group adaptation, formal Darwinism and contextual analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25, 1127–1139.Google Scholar
Oksanen, T. & Henttonen, H. 1996. Dynamics of voles and small mustelids in the taiga landscape of northern Fennoscandia in relation to habitat quality. Ecography, 19, 432–443.Google Scholar
Okuda, N. 2001. The costs of reproduction to males and females of a paternal mouthbrooding cardinalfish Apogon notatus. Journal of Fish Biology, 58, 776–787.Google Scholar
Oldroyd, B.P., Halling, L.A., Good, G., et al. 2001. Worker policing and worker reproduction in Apis cerana. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 371–377.Google Scholar
Olendorf, R., Getty, T. & Scribner, K. 2004. Cooperative nest defence in red-winged blackbirds: reciprocal altruism, kinship or by-product mutualism? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 271, 177–182.Google Scholar
Oli, M.K. 2003. Hamilton goes empirical: estimation of inclusive fitness from life-history data. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270, 307–311.Google Scholar
Oliveira, R.F., McGregor, P.K. & Latruffe, C. 1998. Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 265, 1045–1049.Google Scholar
Oliveira, R.F., Taborsky, M. & Brockmann, H.J. 2008. Alternative Reproductive Tactics: an Integrative Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, A.S. 1997. Size and density dependent mating tactics in the simultaneously hermaphroditic seabass Serranus subligarius (Cope, 1870). Behaviour, 134, 563–594.Google Scholar
Olson, L.E. & Blumstein, D.T. 2009. A trait-based approach to understand the evolution of complex coalitions in male mammals. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 624–632.Google Scholar
Oosthuizen, M.K., Bennett, N.C., Lutermann, H. & Coen, C.W. 2008. Reproductive suppression and the seasonality of reproduction in the social Natal mole-rat (Cryptomys hottentotus natalensis). General and Comparative Endocrinology, 159, 236–240.Google Scholar
Orians, G.H. & Willson, M.F. 1964. Interspecific territories of birds. Ecology, 45, 736–745.Google Scholar
Ortega, J. & Arita, H.T. 2000. Defence of females by dominant males of Artibeus jamaicensis (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Ethology, 106, 395–407.Google Scholar
Ortega, J. & Arita, H.T. 2002. Subordinate males in harem groups of Jamaican fruit-eating bats (Artibeus jamaicensis): Satellites or sneaks? Ethology, 108, 1077–1091.Google Scholar
Ortego, J., Calabuig, G., Aparicio, J.M. & Cordero, P.J. 2008. Genetic consequences of natal dispersal in the colonial lesser kestrel. Molecular Ecology, 17, 2051–2059.Google Scholar
Ostner, J., Schülke, O. & Nunn, C.L. 2008. Female reproductive synchrony predicts skewed paternity across primates. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 1150–1158.Google Scholar
Owen-Smith, N., Martin, J. & Yoganand, K. 2015. Spatially nested niche partitioning between syntopic grazers at foraging arena scale within overlapping home ranges. Ecosphere, 6(9), 1–17.Google Scholar
Öst, M. & Tierala, T. 2011. Synchronized vigilance while feeding in common eider brood-rearing coalitions. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 378–384.Google Scholar
Öst, M., Jaatinen, K. & Steele, B. 2007. Aggressive females seize central positions and show increased vigilance in brood-rearing coalitions of eiders. Animal Behaviour, 73, 239–247.Google Scholar
Öst, M., Smith, B.D. & Kilpi, M. 2008. Social and maternal factors affecting duckling survival in eiders Somateria mollissima. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77, 315–325.Google Scholar
Östlund-Nilsson, S. 2002. Does paternity or paternal investment determine the level of paternal care and does female choice explain egg stealing in the fifteen-spined stickleback? Behavioral Ecology, 13, 188–192.Google Scholar
Packer, C. & Pusey, A.E. 1982. Cooperation and competition within coalitions of male lions – kin selection or game theory. Nature, 296, 740–742.Google Scholar
Packer, C. & Pusey, A.E. 1983. Adaptations of female lions to infanticide by incoming males. The American Naturalist, 121, 716–728.Google Scholar
Packer, C. & Pusey, A.E. 1993. Dispersal, kinship, and inbreeding in African lions. In Thornhill, N.W. (ed.), The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Theoretical and Impirical Perspectives, pp. 375–391. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Packer, C. & Ruttan, L. 1988. The evolution of cooperative hunting. American Naturalist, 132, 159–198.Google Scholar
Packer, C., Scheel, D. & Pusey, A.E. 1990. Why lions form groups: food is not enough. The American Naturalist, 136, 1–19.Google Scholar
Packer, C., Gilbert, D.A., Pusey, A.E. & Obrien, S.J. 1991. A molecular genetic-analysis of kinship and cooperation in African lions. Nature, 351, 562–565.Google Scholar
Packer, C., Lewis, S. & Pusey, A. 1992. A comparative analysis of non-offspring nursing. Animal Behaviour, 43, 265–281.Google Scholar
Packer, C., Pusey, A.E. & Eberly, L.E. 2001. Egalitarianism in female African lions. Science, 293, 690–693.Google Scholar
Painter, J.N., Crozier, R.H., Poiani, A., Robertson, R.J. & Clarke, M.F. 2000. Complex social organization reflects genetic structure and relatedness in the cooperatively breeding bell miner, Manorina melanophrys. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1339–1347.Google Scholar
Pamilo, P. 1990. Sex allocation and queen–worker conflict in polygynous ants. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 31–36.Google Scholar
Pamilo, P. & Rosengren, R. 1984. Evolution of nesting strategies of ants: genetic evidence from different population types of Formica ants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 21, 331–348.Google Scholar
Pande, S., Shitut, S., Freund, L., et al. 2015. Metabolic cross-feeding via intercellular nanotubes among bacteria. Nature Communications, 6, 6238.Google Scholar
Paquet, M., Doutrelant, C., Loubon, M., et al. 2016. Communal roosting, thermoregulatory benefits and breeding group size predictability in cooperatively breeding sociable weavers. Journal of Avian Biology, 47, 749–755.Google Scholar
Park, T. 1954. Experimental studies of interspecies competition II. Temperature, humidity, and competition in two species of Tribolium. Physiological Zoology, 27, 177–238.Google Scholar
Parker, A.K., Parker, C.H. & Codding, B.F. 2019. When to defend? Optimal territoriality across the Numic homeland. Quaternary International, 518, 3–10.Google Scholar
Parker, G.A. 1970. The reproductive behaviour and the nature of sexual selection in Scatophaga stercoraria L. (Diptera: Scatophagidae): II. The fertilization rate and the spatial and temporal relationships of each sex around the site of mating and oviposition. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 39, 205–228.Google Scholar
Parker, G.A. 1974. Assessment strategy and evolution of fighting behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47, 223–243.Google Scholar
Parker, G.A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In Blum, M.S. & Blum, N.A. (eds), Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, pp. 123–166. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Parker, G.A. 1984. Evolutionarily stable strategies. In Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. (eds), Behavioural Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach, pp. 30–61. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Parker, G.A. 1985. Models of parent–offspring conflict V: effects of the behaviour of two parents. Animal Behaviour, 33, 519–533.Google Scholar
Parker, G.A. 2000. Scramble in behaviour and ecology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 355, 1637–1645.Google Scholar
Parker, G.A. 2006. Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 361, 235–259.Google Scholar
Parker, G.A. & Sutherland, W.J. 1986. Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free models. Animal Behaviour, 34, 1222–1242.Google Scholar
Parker, G.A., Ramm, S.A., Lehtonen, J. & Henshaw, J.M. 2018. The evolution of gonad expenditure and gonadosomatic index (GSI) in male and female broadcast-spawning invertebrates. Biological Reviews, 93, 693–753.Google Scholar
Parmentier, T., Dekoninck, W. & Wenseleers, T. 2015. Context-dependent specialization in colony defence in the red wood ant Formica rufa. Animal Behaviour, 103, 161–167.Google Scholar
Parrish, A.E., Brosnan, S.F. & Beran, M.J. 2015. Capuchin monkeys alternate play and reward in a dual computerized task. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 2, 334–347.Google Scholar
Partridge, B.L., Johansson, J. & Kalish, J. 1983. The structure of schools of giant bluefin tuna in Cape Cod Bay. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 9, 253–262.Google Scholar
Patricelli, G.L., Krakauer, A.H. & McElreath, R. 2011. Assets and tactics in a mating market: economic models of negotiation offer insights into animal courtship dynamics on the lek. Current Zoology, 57, 225–236.Google Scholar
Payne, R.J. 1998. Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model. Animal Behaviour, 56, 651–662.Google Scholar
Payne, R.J. & Pagel, M. 1997. Why do animals repeat displays? Animal Behaviour, 54, 109–119.Google Scholar
Peake, T.M. 2005. Eavesdropping in communication networks. In McGregor, P.K. (ed.), Animal Communication Networks, pp. 13–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peake, T.M., Terry, A.M.R., McGregor, P.K. & Dabelsteen, T. 2001. Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male-to-male vocal interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268, 1183–1187.Google Scholar
Peer, K. & Taborsky, M. 2004. Female ambrosia beetles adjust their offspring sex ratio according to outbreeding opportunities for their sons. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17, 257–264.Google Scholar
Peer, K. & Taborsky, M. 2005. Outbreeding depression, but no inbreeding depression in haplodiploid ambrosia beetles with regular sibling mating. Evolution, 59, 317–323.Google Scholar
Peer, K. & Taborsky, M. 2007. Delayed dispersal as a potential route to cooperative breeding in ambrosia beetles. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 729–739.Google Scholar
Peeters, C. & Ito, F. 2001. Colony dispersal and the evolution of queen morphology in social Hymenoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 46, 601–630.Google Scholar
Pena, J. & Rochat, Y. 2012. Bipartite graphs as models of population structures in evolutionary multiplayer games. PLoS One, 7, e44514.Google Scholar
Pena, J., Pestelacci, E., Berchtold, A. & Tomassini, M. 2011. Participation costs can suppress the evolution of upstream reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 273, 197–206.Google Scholar
Pepper, J.W. & Smuts, B.B. 2002. A mechanism for the evolution of altruism among nonkin: positive assortment through environmental feedback. American Naturalist, 160, 205–213.Google Scholar
Perc, M., Gomez-Gardenes, J., Szolnoki, A., Floria, L.M. & Moreno, Y. 2013. Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10, 20120997.Google Scholar
Petersen, C.W. 1995. Reproductive behavior, egg trading, and correlates of male mating success in the simultaneous hemaphrodite, Serranus tabacarius. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 43, 351–361.Google Scholar
Petit, O. & Bon, R. 2010. Decision-making processes: the case of collective movements. Behavioural Processes, 84, 635–647.Google Scholar
Petrie, M. & Moller, A.P. 1991. Laying eggs in other’s nests: intraspecific brood parasitism in birds. TREE, 6, 315–320.Google Scholar
Petrie, M., Krupa, A. & Burke, T. 1999. Peacocks lek with relatives even in the absence of social and environmental cues. Nature, 401, 155.Google Scholar
Peyton, K.A., Valentino, L.M. & Maruska, K.P. 2014. Dual roles of an algal farming damselfish as a cultivator and opportunistic browser of an invasive seaweed. PLoS One, 9, e109007.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, T., Rutte, C., Killingback, T., Taborsky, M. & Bonhoeffer, S. 2005. Evolution of cooperation by generalized reciprocity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272, 1115–1120.Google Scholar
Pfennig, D.W. 1992. Polyphenism in spadefoot toad tadpoles as a locally adjusted evolutionarily stable strategy. Evolution, 46, 1408–1420.Google Scholar
Pfennig, K.S. 2007. Facultative mate choice drives adaptive hybridization. Science, 318, 965–967Google Scholar
Pfennig, K.S. & Simovich, M.A. 2002. Differential selection to avoid hybridization in two toad species. Evolution, 56, 1840–1848.Google Scholar
Phillips, T. 2018. The concepts of asymmetric and symmetric power can help resolve the puzzle of altruistic and cooperative behaviour. Biological Reviews, 93, 457–468.Google Scholar
Picchi, L., Cabanes, G., Ricci-Bonot, C. & Lorenzi, M.C. 2018. Quantitative matching of clutch size in reciprocating hermaphroditic worms. Current Biology, 28, 3254–3259.Google Scholar
Pietsch, T.W. 2005. Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes). Ichthyological Research, 52, 207–236.Google Scholar
Piper, W.H. 1994. Courtship, copulation, nesting behavior and brood parasitism in the Venezuelan stripe-backed wren. Condor, 96, 654–671.Google Scholar
Pitcher, T.J. 1986. Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In Pitcher, T.J. (ed.), The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes, pp. 294–337. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Pitcher, T.J. 1992. Who dares, wins: the function and evolution of predator inspection behaviour in shoaling fish. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 42, 371–391.Google Scholar
Piyapong, C., Butlin, R.K., Faria, J.J., et al. 2011. Kin assortment in juvenile shoals in wild guppy populations. Heredity, 106, 749.Google Scholar
Pizzari, T. & Birkhead, T.R. 2000. Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males. Nature, 405, 787–789.Google Scholar
Pizzari, T. & Gardner, A. 2012. The sociobiology of sex: inclusive fitness consequences of inter-sexual interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 367, 2314–2323.Google Scholar
Plantan, T., Howitt, M., Kotzé, A. & Gaines, M. 2013. Feeding preferences of the red-billed oxpecker, Buphagus erythrorhynchus: a parasitic mutualist? African Journal of Ecology, 51, 325–336.Google Scholar
Platt, T.G. & Bever, J.D. 2009. Kin competition and the evolution of cooperation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 370–377.Google Scholar
Poethke, H.J. & Kaiser, H. 1987. The territoriality threshold – a model for mutual avoidance in dragonfly mating systems. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 20, 11–19.Google Scholar
Pope, T.R. 1998. Effects of demographic change on group kin structure and gene dynamics of populations of red howling monkeys. Journal of Mammalogy, 79, 692–712.Google Scholar
Port, M., Clough, D. & Kappeler, P.M. 2009. Market effects offset the reciprocation of grooming in free-ranging redfronted lemurs, Eulemur fulvus rufus. Animal Behaviour, 77, 29–36.Google Scholar
Port, M., Schulke, O. & Ostner, J. 2017. From individual to group territoriality: competitive environments promote the evolution of sociality. American Naturalist, 189, E46–E57.Google Scholar
Power, M.E. 1983. Grazing responses of tropical freshwater fishes to different scales of variation in their food. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 9, 103–115.Google Scholar
Powers, D.R. 1987. Effects of variation in food quality on the breeding territoriality of the male Anna’s hummingbird. Condor, 89, 103–111.Google Scholar
Pradeu, T. 2010. What is an organism? An immunological answer. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32, 247–267.Google Scholar
Pradeu, T. 2013. Immunity and the emergence of individuality. In Bouchard, F. & Huneman, P. (eds), From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality, pp. 77–96. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pravosudova, E.V. & Grubb, T.C. Jr 2000. An experimental test of the prolonged brood care model in the tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor). Behavioral Ecology, 11, 309–314.Google Scholar
Premnath, S., Sinha, A. & Gadagkar, R. 1996. Dominance relationship in the establishment of reproductive division of labour in a primitively eusocial wasp (Ropalidia marginata). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 39, 125–132.Google Scholar
Premoli, M.C. & Sella, G. 1995. Alloparental egg care in the polychaete worm Ophryotrocha diadema. Ethology, 101, 177–186.Google Scholar
Press, W.H. & Dyson, F.J. 2012. Iterated prisoner’s dilemma contains strategies that dominate any evolutionary opponent. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 10409–10413.Google Scholar
Pressley, P.H. 1981. Pair formation and joint territoriality in a simultaneous hermaphrodite: the coral reef fish Serranus tigrinus. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 56, 33–46.Google Scholar
Pruett-Jones, S.G. & Lewis, M.J. 1990. Sex ratio and habitat limitation promote delayed dispersal in superb fairy-wrens. Nature, 348, 541.Google Scholar
Pruitt, J.N. & Riechert, S.E. 2011. Within-group behavioral variation promotes biased task performance and the emergence of a defensive caste in a social spider. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 1055–1060.Google Scholar
Pusey, A.E. & Packer, C. 1987. The evolution of sex-biased dispersal in lions. Behaviour, 101, 275–310.Google Scholar
Pusey, A.E. & Packer, C. 1994. Non-offspring nursing in social carnivores: minimizing the costs. Behavioral Ecology, 5, 362–374.Google Scholar
Pusey, A. & Wolf, M. 1996. Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 201–206.Google Scholar
Queller, D.C. 1984. Kin selection and frequency dependence: a game theoretic approach. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 23, 133–143.Google Scholar
Queller, D.C. 1985. Kinship, reciprocity and synergism in the evolution of social-behavior. Nature, 318, 366–367.Google Scholar
Queller, D.C. 1992. Does population viscosity promote kin selection? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 7, 322–324.Google Scholar
Queller, D.C. 1994a. Genetic relatedness in viscous populations. Evolutionary Ecology, 8, 70–73.Google Scholar
Queller, D.C. 1994b. Male–female conflict and parent–offspring conflict. The American Naturalist, 144, S84–S99.Google Scholar
Queller, D.C. & Goodnight, K.F. 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution, 43, 258–275.Google Scholar
Queller, D.C. & Strassmann, J.E. 1998. Kin selection and social insects. Bioscience, 48, 165–175.Google Scholar
Queller, D.C. & Strassmann, J.E. 2009. Beyond society: the evolution of organismality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3143–3155.Google Scholar
Queller, D.C., Zacchi, F., Cervo, R., et al. 2000. Unrelated helpers in a social insect. Nature, 405, 784–787.Google Scholar
Queller, D.C., Ponte, E., Bozzaro, S. & Strassmann, J.E. 2003. Single-gene greenbeard effects in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Science, 299, 105–106.Google Scholar
Quilichini, A., Debussche, M. & Thompson, J.D. 2001. Evidence for local outbreeding depression in the Mediterranean island endemic Anchusa crispa Viv. (Boraginaceae). Heredity, 87, 190.Google Scholar
Quinn, J.L. & Kokorev, Y. 2002. Trading-off risks from predators and from aggressive hosts. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 51, 455–460.Google Scholar
Quinn, J.L. & Ueta, M. 2008. Protective nesting associations in birds. Ibis, 150, 146–167.Google Scholar
Quinn, J.L., Prop, J., Kokorev, Y. & Black, J.M. 2003. Predator protection or similar habitat selection in red-breasted goose nesting associations: extremes along a continuum. Animal Behaviour, 65, 297–307.Google Scholar
Quinn, J.S., Woolfenden, G.E., Fitzpatrick, J.W. & White, B.N. 1999. Multi-locus DNA fingerprinting supports genetic monogamy in Florida scrub-jays. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 45(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Quinones, A.E., van Doorn, G.S., Pen, I., Weissing, F.J. & Taborsky, M. 2016. Negotiation and appeasement can be more effective drivers of sociality than kin selection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150089.Google Scholar
Quirici, V., Palma, M., Sobrero, R.l., Faugeron, S. & Ebensperger, L.A. 2013. Relatedness does not predict vigilance in a population of the social rodent Octodon degus. Acta Ethologica, 16, 1–8.Google Scholar
Rabenold, K.N. 1985. Cooperation in breeding by nonreproductive wrens: kinship, reciprocity, and demography. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 17, 1–17.Google Scholar
Radford, A.N. 2008a. Type of threat influences postconflict allopreening in a social bird. Current Biology, 18, R114–R115.Google Scholar
Radford, A.N. 2008b. Duration and outcome of intergroup conflict influences intragroup affiliative behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2787–2791.Google Scholar
Radford, A.N. & Du Plessis, M.A. 2006. Dual function of allopreening in the cooperatively breeding green woodhoopoe, Phoeniculus purpureus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 221–230.Google Scholar
Radford, A.N. & Ridley, A.R. 2006. Recruitment calling: a novel form of extended parental care in an altricial species. Current Biology, 16, 1700–1704.Google Scholar
Radford, A.N., Bell, M.B.V., Hollén, L.I. & Ridley, A.R. 2011. Singing for your supper: sentinel calling by kleptoparasites can mitigate the cost to victims. Evolution, 65, 900–906.Google Scholar
Radford, A.N., Majolo, B. & Aureli, F. 2016. Within-group behavioural consequences of between-group conflict: a prospective review. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 283, 20161567.Google Scholar
Raignier, A. & Van Boven, J. 1955. Étude taxonomique, biologique at biometrique des Dorylus du sous-genre Annoma (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Annales de la Museum Royale de Congo Belgique, 2, 1–359.Google Scholar
Raihani, N.J. & Bshary, R. 2015. Third-party punishers are rewarded, but third-party helpers even more so. Evolution, 69, 993–1003.Google Scholar
Raihani, N.J., Grutter, A.S. & Bshary, R. 2010. Punishers benefit from third-party punishment in fish. Science, 327, 171.Google Scholar
Raihani, N.J., Thornton, A. & Bshary, R. 2012. Punishment and cooperation in nature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 288–295.Google Scholar
Ramos, A., Fonseca, P.J., Modesto, T., Almada, V.C. & Amorim, M.C. 2012. Alloparental behavior in the highly vocal Lusitanian toadfish. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 434, 58–62.Google Scholar
Rand, D.G., Tarnita, C.E., Ohtsuki, H. & Nowak, M.A. 2013. Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 2581–2586.Google Scholar
Randall, J.A., McCowan, B., Collins, K.C., Hooper, S.L. & Rogovin, K. 2005. Alarm signals of the great gerbil: acoustic variation by predator context, sex, age, individual, and family group. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 2706–2714.Google Scholar
Rangel-Negrín, A., Flores-Escobar, E., Coyohua-Fuentes, A., et al. 2015. Behavioural and glucocorticoid responses of a captive group of spider monkeys to short-term variation in food presentation. Folia Primatologica, 86, 433–445.Google Scholar
Rankin, D.J. 2011. Kin selection and the evolution of sexual conflict. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24, 71–81.Google Scholar
Rankin, D.J. & Taborsky, M. 2009. Assortment and the evolution of generalized reciprocity. Evolution, 63, 1913–1922.Google Scholar
Rankin, D.J., Bargum, K. & Kokko, H. 2007. The tragedy of the commons in evolutionary biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22, 643–651.Google Scholar
Rasa, O.A. 1977. The ethology and sociology of the dwarf mongoose (Helogale undulata rufula). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 43, 337–406.Google Scholar
Rasa, O.A. 1986. Coordinated vigilance in dwarf mongoose family groups: the ‘watchman’s song’ hypothesis and the costs of guarding. Ethology, 71, 340–344.Google Scholar
Rasa, O.A.E. 1989. The costs and effectiveness of vigilance behavior in the dwarf mongoose – implications for fitness and optimal group-size. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 1, 265–282.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, G.S.A., Gusset, M., Courchamp, F. & Macdonald, D.W. 2008. Achilles’ heel of sociality revealed by energetic poverty trap in cursorial hunters. The American Naturalist, 172, 508–518.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, J.M. & ter Hofstede, H.M. 2005. Roosts as information centres: social learning of food preferences in bats. Biology Letters, 1, 72–74.Google Scholar
Ratledge, C. & Dover, L.G. 2000. Iron metabolism in pathogenic bacteria. Annual Reviews in Microbiology, 54, 881–941.Google Scholar
Ratnieks, F.L.W. 1988. Reproductive harmony via mutual policing by workers in eusocial Hymenoptera. The American Naturalist, 132, 217–236.Google Scholar
Ratnieks, F.L.W. & Visscher, K.P. 1989. Worker policing in the honeybee. Nature, 342, 796–797.Google Scholar
Ratnieks, F.L.W. & Wenseleers, T. 2005. Policing insect societies. Science, 307, 54–56.Google Scholar
Ratnieks, F.L. & Wenseleers, T. 2008. Altruism in insect societies and beyond: voluntary or enforced? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 45–52.Google Scholar
Ratnieks, F.L.W., Foster, K.R. & Wenseleers, T. 2006. Conflict resolution in insect societies. Annual Review of Entomology, 51, 581–608.Google Scholar
Rautiala, P., Helantera, H. & Puurtinen, M. 2019. Extended haplodiploidy hypothesis. Evolution Letters, 3, 263–270.Google Scholar
Raveh, A., Kotler, B.P., Abramsky, Z. & Krasnov, B.R. 2011. Driven to distraction: detecting the hidden costs of flea parasitism through foraging behaviour in gerbils. Ecology Letters, 14, 47–51.Google Scholar
Reader, S.M., Hager, Y. & Laland, K.N. 2011. The evolution of primate general and cultural intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 1017–1027.Google Scholar
Recer, G.M., Blanckenhorn, W.U., Newman, J.A., et al. 1987. Temporal resource variability and the habitat-matching rule. Evolutionary Ecology, 1, 363–378.Google Scholar
Reddon, A.R., Voisin, M.R., Menon, N., et al. 2011a. Rules of engagement for resource contests in a social fish. Animal Behaviour, 82, 93–99.Google Scholar
Reddon, A.R., Balk, D. & Balshine, S. 2011b. Sex differences in group-joining decisions in social fish. Animal Behaviour, 82, 229–234.Google Scholar
Reed, C., Branconi, R., Majoris, J., Johnson, C. & Buston, P. 2019. Competitive growth in a social fish. Biology Letters, 15, 20180737.Google Scholar
Reed, T.M. 1982. Interspecific territoriality in the chaffinch and great tit on islands and the mainland of Scotland: playback and removal experiments. Animal Behaviour, 30, 171–181.Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K. 1989. The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. The American Naturalist, 133, 407–435.Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K. 1991. Polistes. In Ross, K.R. & Matthews, R.W. (eds), The Social Biology of Wasps, pp. 99–148. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K. 1992. Queen activation of lazy workers in colonies of the eusocial naked mole-rat. Nature, 358, 147–149.Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K. 2000. A transactional theory of within-group conflict. The American Naturalist, 155, 365–382.Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K. & Gamboa, G.J. 1983. Colony activity integration in primitively eusocial wasps – the role of the queen (Polistes fuscatus, Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 13, 63–74.Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K. & Gamboa, G.J. 1987. Queen regulation of worker foraging in paper wasps – a social feedback-control system (Polistes fuscatus, Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Behaviour, 102, 147–167.Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K. & Hölldobler, B. 2007. The emergence of a superorganism through intergroup competition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 9736–9740.Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K. & Keller, L. 1995. Partitioning of reproduction in mother-daughter versus sibling associations – a test of optimal skew theory. The American Naturalist, 145, 119–132.Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K. & Nonacs, P. 1997. Within-group aggression and the value of group members: theory and a field test with social wasps. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 75–82.Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K. & Ratnieks, F.L.W. 1993. Queen–queen conflicts in polygynous societies: mutual tolerance and reproductive skew. In Keller, L. (ed.), Queen Number and Sociality in Insects, pp. 45–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K. & Sherman, P.W. 1991. Intracolonial aggression and nepotism by the breeding female naked mole-rat. In Sherman, P.W., Jarvis, J.U.M. & Alexander, R.D. (eds), The Biology of the Naked Mole-Rat. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K., Westneat, D.F., Noon, W.A., Sherman, P.W. & Aquadro, C.F. 1990. DNA ‘fingerprinting’ reveals high levels of inbreeding in colonies of the eusocial naked mole-rat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 87, 2496–2500.Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K., Emlen, S.T. & Keller, L. 1998a. Reproductive sharing in animal societies: reproductive incentives or incomplete control by dominant breeders? Behavioral Ecology, 9, 267–278.Google Scholar
Reeve, H.K., Peters, J.M., Nonacs, P. & Starks, P.T. 1998b. Dispersal of first ‘workers’ in social wasps: causes and implications of an alternative reproductive strategy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 13737–13742.Google Scholar
Refardt, D., Bergmiller, T. & Kummerli, R. 2013. Altruism can evolve when relatedness is low: evidence from bacteria committing suicide upon phage infection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 280, 20123035.Google Scholar
Regnaut, S., Christe, P., Chapuisat, M. & Fumagalli, L. 2006. Genotyping faeces reveals facultative kin association on capercaillie’s leks. Conservation Genetics, 7, 665–674.Google Scholar
Reuter, M., Ward, P.I. & Blanckenhorn, W.U. 1998. An ESS treatment of the pattern of female arrival at the mating site in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L.). Journal of Theoretical Biology, 195, 363–370.Google Scholar
Reyer, H.U. 1980. Flexible helper structure as an ecological adaptation in the pied kingfisher (Ceryle rudis rudis L.). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 6, 219–227.Google Scholar
Reyer, H.U. 1984. Investment and relatedness: a cost/benefit analysis of breeding and helping in the pied kingfisher (Ceryle rudis). Animal Behaviour, 32, 1163–1178.Google Scholar
Reyer, H.U. 1986. Breeder–helper interactions in the pied kingfisher reflect the costs and benefits of cooperative breeding. Behaviour, 96, 277–303.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S.M., Dryer, K., Bollback, J., et al. 2007. Behavioral paternity predicts genetic paternity in satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus), a species with a non-resource-based mating system. The Auk, 124, 857–867.Google Scholar
Ribbink, A.J., Marsh, A.C., Marsh, B. & Sharp, B.J. 1980. Parental behaviour and mixed broods among cichlid fish of Lake Malawi. African Zoology, 15, 1–6.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, A.M., Lloyd, P., Feldheim, K.A. & Bowie, R.C. 2012. Microgeographic socio-genetic structure of an African cooperative breeding passerine revealed: integrating behavioural and genetic data. Molecular Ecology, 21, 662–672.Google Scholar
Richardson, D.S. & Bolen, G.M. 1999. A nesting association between semi-colonial Bullock’s orioles and yellow-billed magpies: evidence for the predator protection hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 373–380.Google Scholar
Richardson, D.S. & Burke, T. 2001. Extrapair paternity and variance in reproductive success related to breeding density in Bullock’s orioles. Animal Behaviour, 62, 519–525.Google Scholar
Richardson, D.S., Jury, F.L., Blaakmeer, K., Komdeur, J. & Burke, T. 2001. Parentage assignment and extra-group paternity in a cooperative breeder: the Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). Molecular Ecology, 10, 2263–2273.Google Scholar
Richardson, D.S., Burke, T. & Komdeur, J. 2002. Direct benefits and the evolution of female-biased cooperative breeding in Seychelles warblers. Evolution, 56, 2313–2321.Google Scholar
Richardson, D.S., Burke, T. & Komdeur, J. 2003a. Sex-specific associative learning cues and inclusive fitness benefits in the Seychelles warbler. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 854–861.Google Scholar
Richardson, D.S., Komdeur, J. & Burke, T. 2003b. Avian behaviour: altruism and infidelity among warblers. Nature, 422, 580.Google Scholar
Richardson, D.S., Komdeur, J., Burke, T. & Von Schantz, T. 2005. MHC-based patterns of social and extra-pair mate choice in the Seychelles warbler. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272, 759–767.Google Scholar
Richardson, D.S., Burke, T. & Komdeur, J. 2007. Grandparent helpers: the adaptive significance of older, postdominant helpers in the Seychelles warbler. Evolution, 61, 2790–2800.Google Scholar
Rickard, I.J. & Lummaa, V. 2007. The predictive adaptive response and metabolic syndrome: challenges for the hypothesis. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, 18, 94–99.Google Scholar
Ridley, A.R. 2016. Southern pied babblers: the dynamics of conflict and cooperation in a group living society. In Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. (eds), Cooperative Breeding in Vertebrates: Studies of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, pp. 115–132. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ridley, A.R. & Raihani, N.J. 2007. Facultative response to a kleptoparasite by the cooperatively breeding pied babbler. Behavioral Ecology, 18, 324–330.Google Scholar
Ridley, A.R., Nelson-Flower, M.J. & Thompson, A.M. 2013. Is sentinel behaviour safe? An experimental investigation. Animal Behaviour, 85, 137–142.Google Scholar
Ridley, J., Komdeur, J. & Sutherland, W.J. 2003. Population regulation in group-living birds: predictive models of the Seychelles warbler. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 588–598.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. & Rechten, C. 1981. Female sticklebacks prefer to spawn with males whose nests contain eggs. Behaviour, 76, 152–161.Google Scholar
Riebli, T., Avgan, B., Bottini, A.M., et al. 2011. Behavioural type affects dominance and growth in staged encounters of cooperatively breeding cichlids. Animal Behaviour, 81, 313–323.Google Scholar
Riebli, T., Taborsky, M., Chervet, N., et al. 2012. Behavioural type, status and social context affect behaviour and resource allocation in cooperatively breeding cichlids. Animal Behaviour, 84, 925–936.Google Scholar
Riedman, M.L. 1982. The evolution of alloparental care and adoption in mammals and birds. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 57, 405–435.Google Scholar
Riehl, C. 2011a. Living with strangers: direct benefits favour non-kin cooperation in a communally nesting bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278, 1728–1735.Google Scholar
Riehl, C. 2011b. Paternal investment and the ‘sexually selected hypothesis’ for the evolution of eggshell coloration: revisiting the assumptions. The Auk, 128, 175–179.Google Scholar
Riehl, C. 2013. Evolutionary routes to non-kin cooperative breeding in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 280, 20132245.Google Scholar
Riehl, C. 2016. Infanticide and within-clutch competition select for reproductive synchrony in a cooperative bird. Evolution, 70, 1760–1769.Google Scholar
Riehl, C. & Frederickson, M.E. 2016. Cheating and punishment in cooperative animal societies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150090.Google Scholar
Riehl, C. & Strong, M.J. 2019. Social parasitism as an alternative reproductive tactic in a cooperatively breeding cuckoo. Nature, 567, 96–99.Google Scholar
Rieucau, G. & Giraldeau, L.A. 2009. Group size effect caused by food competition in nutmeg mannikins (Lonchura punctulata). Behavioral Ecology, 20, 421–425.Google Scholar
Ritz, D.A., Hobday, A.J., Montgomery, J.C. & Ward, A.J. 2011. Social aggregation in the pelagic zone with special reference to fish and invertebrates. In Lesser, M. (ed.), Advances in Marine Biology, Volume 60, pp. 161–227. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Roberts, G. 1998. Competitive altruism: from reciprocity to the handicap principle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 265, 427–431.Google Scholar
Roberts, H. 1960. Trachyostus ghanaensis Schedl (Col., Platypodidae), an ambrosia beetle attacking wawa, Triplochiton scleroxylon K. Schum. Technical Bulletin, West African Timber Borer Research Unit.Google Scholar
Robertson, D.R. 1984. Cohabitation of competing territorial damselfishes on a caribbean coral-reef. Ecology, 65, 1121–1135.Google Scholar
Robertson, D.R. & Warner, R.R. 1978. Sexual patterns in the labroid fishes of the Western Caribbean, II, the parrotfishes (Scaridae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology No. 255. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, D.R., Sweatman, H.P.A., Fletcher, E.A. & Cleland, M.G. 1976. Schooling as a mechanism for circumventing the territoriality of competitors. Ecology, 57, 1208–1220.Google Scholar
Robinson, E.J.H. 2014. Polydomy: the organisation and adaptive function of complex nest systems in ants. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 5, 37–43.Google Scholar
Robinson, E.J. & Barker, J.L. 2017. Inter-group cooperation in humans and other animals. Biology Letters, 13, 20160793.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, A.M. & Gardner, A. 2012. Evolution of helping and harming in heterogeneous populations. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 66, 2065–2079.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, A.M. & Gardner, A. 2013. Evolution of helping and harming in viscous populations when group size varies. The American Naturalist, 181, 609–622.Google Scholar
Rohwer, S. 1978. Parent cannibalism of offspring and egg raiding as a courtship strategy. The American Naturalist, 112, 429–440.Google Scholar
Romero, T. & Aureli, F. 2008. Reciprocity of support in coatis (Nasua nasua). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 122, 19–25.Google Scholar
Ronce, O., Gandon, S. & Rousset, F. 2000. Kin selection and natal dispersal in an age-structured population. Theoretical Population Biology, 58, 143–159.Google Scholar
Rood, J.P. 1990. Group size, survival, reproduction, and routes to breeding in dwarf mongooses. Animal Behaviour, 39, 566–572.Google Scholar
Rose, L.M. 1997. Vertebrate predation and food-sharing in Cebus and Pan. International Journal of Primatology, 18, 727–765.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, S. & Gettler, L.T. 2018. With a little help from her friends (and family) part I: the ecology and evolution of non-maternal care in mammals. Physiology & Behavior, 193, 1–11.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, S., Vecellio, V. & Stoinski, T. 2016. Observations of severe and lethal coalitionary attacks in wild mountain gorillas. Scientific Reports, 6, 37018.Google Scholar
Rosengrave, P., Montgomerie, R. & Gemmell, N. 2016. Cryptic female choice enhances fertilization success and embryo survival in chinook salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 283, 20160001.Google Scholar
Ross, L., Gardner, A., Hardy, N. & West, S. 2013. Ecology, not the genetics of sex determination, determines who helps in eusocial populations. Current Biology, 23, 2383–2387.Google Scholar
Ross, R.M. 1978. Territorial behavior and ecology of the anemonefish Amphiprion melanopus on Guam 1. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 46, 71–83.Google Scholar
Rothstein, S.I. & Pierotti, R. 1988. Distinctions among reciprocal altruism, kin selection, and cooperation and a model for the initial evolution of beneficent behavior. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 189–209.Google Scholar
Roulin, A., Des Monstiers, B., Ifrid, E., et al. 2016. Reciprocal preening and food sharing in colour-polymorphic nestling barn owls. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 29, 380–394.Google Scholar
Roulin, A. 2002. The sibling negotiation hypothesis. In Wright, J. & Leonard, M.L. (eds), The Evolution of Begging, pp. 107–126. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Rousset, F. & Gandon, S. 2002. Evolution of the distribution of dispersal distance under distance-dependent cost of dispersal. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 15, 515–523.Google Scholar
Rousseu, F., Charette, Y. & Belisle, M. 2014. Resource defense and monopolization in a marked population of ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris). Ecology and Evolution, 4, 776–793.Google Scholar
Rowell, T.E., Wilson, C. & Cords, M. 1991. Reciprocity and partner preference in grooming of female blue monkeys. International Journal of Primatology, 12, 319–336.Google Scholar
Roy Nielsen, C.L., Parker, P.G. & Gates, R.J. 2008. Partial clutch predation, dilution of predation risk, and the evolution of intraspecific nest parasitism. The Auk, 125, 679–686.Google Scholar
Royle, N.J., Smiseth, P.T. & Kölliker, M. 2012. The Evolution of Parental Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Royle, N.J., Alonzo, S.H. & Moore, A.J. 2016. Co-evolution, conflict and complexity: what have we learned about the evolution of parental care behaviours? Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 12, 30–36.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, D.I. 1981. Population density, resource patterning, and territoriality in the Everglades pygmy sunfish. Animal Behaviour, 29, 155–172.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, D.I. & Nuñez, C.M. 2009. Sociality and reproductive skew in horses and zebras. In Hager, R. & Jones, C.B. (eds), Reproductive Skew in Vertebrates: Proximate and Ultimate Causes, pp. 196–226. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, D.R. 2007. Female extrapair mate choice in a cooperative breeder: trading sex for help and increasing offspring heterozygosity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 1895–1903.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, D.R. 2011. Spatiotemporal environmental variation, risk aversion, and the evolution of cooperative breeding as a bet-hedging strategy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 10816–10822.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, D.R. & Abbot, P. 2017. Comparative Social Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, D.R. & Lovette, I.J. 2007. Temporal environmental variability drives the evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Current Biology, 17, 1414–1419.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, A. 1979. An optimal conviction policy for offenses that may have been committed by accident. In Brams, S.J., Schotter, A. & Schwödiauer, G. (eds), Applied Game Theory, pp. 406–413. Heidelberg: Physica.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, A. 1980. On an anomaly of the deterrent effect of punishment. Economics Letters, 6, 89–94.Google Scholar
Rueger, T., Barbasch, T.A., Wong, M.Y., et al. 2018. Reproductive control via the threat of eviction in the clown anemonefish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 285, 20181295.Google Scholar
Rumbaugh, K.P., Diggle, S.P., Watters, C.M., et al. 2009. Quorum sensing and the social evolution of bacterial virulence. Current Biology, 19, 341–345.Google Scholar
Rusch, H. & Gavrilets, S. 2017. The logic of animal intergroup conflict: a review. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 178, 1014–1030.Google Scholar
Russell, A.F. 2000. Ecological constraints and the cooperative breeding system of the long-tailed tit Aegithalos caudatus. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
Russell, A.F. 2004. Mammals: comparisons and contrasts. In Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. (eds), Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, pp. 210–227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, A.F. & Hatchwell, B.J. 2001. Experimental evidence for kin-biased helping in a cooperatively breeding vertebrate. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268, 2169–2174.Google Scholar
Russell, A.F., Sharpe, L.L., Brotherton, P.N.M. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2003. Cost minimization by helpers in cooperative vertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 3333-3338.Google Scholar
Russell, A., Langmore, N., Cockburn, A., Astheimer, L. & Kilner, R. 2007a. Reduced egg investment can conceal helper effects in cooperatively breeding birds. Science, 317, 941–944.Google Scholar
Russell, A.F., Young, A.J., Spong, G., Jordan, N.R. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2007b. Helpers increase the reproductive potential of offspring in cooperative meerkats. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 513–524.Google Scholar
Russell, E.M., Yom-Tov, Y. & Geffen, E. 2004. Extended parental care and delayed dispersal: northern, tropical, and southern passerines compared. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 831–838.Google Scholar
Rusu, A.S. & Krackow, S. 2004. Kin-preferential cooperation, dominance-dependent reproductive skew, and competition for mates in communally nesting female house mice. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 56, 298–305.Google Scholar
Rutte, C. & Taborsky, M. 2007. Generalized reciprocity in rats. PLoS Biology, 5, 1421–1425.Google Scholar
Rutte, C. & Taborsky, M. 2008. The influence of social experience on cooperative behaviour of rats (Rattus norvegicus): direct vs generalised reciprocity. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 499–505.Google Scholar
Rutte, C., Taborsky, M. & Brinkhof, M.W.G. 2006. What sets the odds of winning and losing? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 16–21.Google Scholar
Ryder, T.B., Parker, P.G., Blake, J.G. & Loiselle, B.A. 2009. It takes two to tango: reproductive skew and social correlates of male mating success in a lek-breeding bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276, 2377–2384.Google Scholar
Sabbatini, G., Vizioli, A.D., Visalberghi, E. & Schino, G. 2012. Food transfers in capuchin monkeys: an experiment on partner choice. Biology Letters, 8, 757–759.Google Scholar
Sachs, J., Mueller, U., Wilcox, T. & Bull, J. 2004. The evolution of cooperation. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 79, 135–160.Google Scholar
Saha, P., Balasubramaniam, K., Kalyani, J., et al. 2012. Clinging to royalty: Ropalidia marginata queens can employ both pheromone and aggression. Insectes Sociaux, 59, 41–44.Google Scholar
Sakai, M., Hishii, T., Takeda, S. & Kohshima, S. 2006. Flipper rubbing behaviors in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus). Marine Mammal Science, 22, 966–978.Google Scholar
Salles, O.C., Pujol, B., Maynard, J.A., et al. 2016. First genealogy for a wild marine fish population reveals multigenerational philopatry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 13245–13250.Google Scholar
Sandell, M. & Liberg, O. 1992. Roamers and stayers – a model on male mating tactics and mating systems. American Naturalist, 139, 177–189.Google Scholar
Sanderson, J.L., Wang, J.L., Vitikainen, E.I.K., Cant, M.A. & Nichols, H.J. 2015a. Banded mongooses avoid inbreeding when mating with members of the same natal group. Molecular Ecology, 24, 3738–3751.Google Scholar
Sanderson, J.L., Nichols, H.J., Marshall, H.H., et al. 2015b. Elevated glucocorticoid concentrations during gestation predict reduced reproductive success in subordinate female banded mongooses. Biology Letters, 11, 20150620.Google Scholar
Sankey, D.W., Shepard, E.L., Biro, D. & Portugal, S.J. 2019. Speed consensus and the ‘Goldilocks principle’ in flocking birds (Columba livia). Animal Behaviour, 157, 105–119.Google Scholar
Santema, P. & Clutton-Brock, T. 2012. Dominant female meerkats do not use aggression to elevate work rates of helpers in response to increased brood demand. Animal Behaviour, 83, 827–832.Google Scholar
Santoro, F.H. 1963. Bioecología de Platypus sulcatus Chapuis (Coeloptera, Platypodidae). Revista de Investigaciones Forestales, 4, 47–79.Google Scholar
Santos, F.C. & Pacheco, J.M. 2005. Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation. Physical Review Letters, 95, 098104.Google Scholar
Santos, F.C. & Pacheco, J.M. 2006. A new route to the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19, 726–733.Google Scholar
Santos, F.C., Pacheco, J.M. & Lenaerts, T. 2006. Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 3490–3494.Google Scholar
Santos, J. & Lacey, E. 2011. Burrow sharing in the desert-adapted torch-tail spiny rat, Trinomys yonenagae. Journal of Mammalogy, 92, 3–11.Google Scholar
Sato, N., Tan, L., Tate, K. & Okada, M. 2015. Rats demonstrate helping behavior toward a soaked conspecific. Animal Cognition, 18, 1039–1047.Google Scholar
Sato, T. 1987. A brood parasitic catfish of the mouthbrooding cichlid fishes in Lake Tanganyika. In Kawanabe, H. (ed.), Ecological and Limnological Studies on Lake Tanganyika and Its Adjacent Areas, pp. 43–44. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.Google Scholar
Sato, T., Hirose, M., Taborsky, M. & Kimura, S. 2004. Size-dependent male alternative reproductive tactics in the shell-brooding cichlid fish Lamprologus callipterus in Lake Tanganyika. Ethology, 110, 49–62.Google Scholar
Saunders, J.L. & Knoke, J.K. 1967. Diets for rearing the ambrosia beetle Xyleborus ferrugineus (Fabricius) in vitro. Science, 157, 460–463.Google Scholar
Savage, J.L., Russell, A.F. & Johnstone, R.A. 2013. Intra-group relatedness affects parental and helper investment rules in offspring care. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67, 1855–1865.Google Scholar
Savage, J.L., Russell, A.F. & Johnstone, R.A. 2015. Maternal allocation in cooperative breeders: should mothers match or compensate for expected helper contributions? Animal Behaviour, 102, 189–197.Google Scholar
Savage, J.L., Browning, L.E., Manica, A., Russell, A.F. & Johnstone, R.A. 2017. Turn-taking in cooperative offspring care: by-product of individual provisioning behavior or active response rule? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71, 162.Google Scholar
Sæther, B.E. & Engen, S. 2015. The concept of fitness in fluctuating environments. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30, 273–281.Google Scholar
Schacht, R. & Bell, A.V. 2016. The evolution of monogamy in response to partner scarcity. Scientific Reports, 6, 32472.Google Scholar
Schaedelin, F.C., van Dongen, W.F.D. & Wagner, R.H. 2013. Nonrandom brood mixing suggests adoption in a colonial cichlid. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 540–546.Google Scholar
Scheel, D. & Packer, C. 1991. Group hunting behavior of lions – a search for cooperation. Animal Behaviour, 41, 697–709.Google Scholar
Scheid, C., Schmidt, J. & Noe, R. 2008. Distinct patterns of food offering and co-feeding in rooks. Animal Behaviour, 76, 1701–1707.Google Scholar
Schel, A.M., Machanda, Z., Townsend, S.W., Zuberbühler, K. & Slocombe, K.E. 2013. Chimpanzee food calls are directed at specific individuals. Animal Behaviour, 86, 955–965.Google Scholar
Schink, B. 2002. Synergistic interactions in the microbial world. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 81, 257–261.Google Scholar
Schino, G. 2007. Grooming and agonistic support: a meta-analysis of primate reciprocal altruism. Behavioral Ecology, 18, 115–120.Google Scholar
Schino, G. & Aureli, F. 2008a. Grooming reciprocation among female primates: a meta-analysis. Biology Letters, 4, 9–11.Google Scholar
Schino, G. & Aureli, F. 2008b. Trade-offs in primate grooming reciprocation: testing behavioural flexibility and correlated evolution. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 95, 439–446.Google Scholar
Schino, G. & Aureli, F. 2009. Reciprocal altruism in primates: partner choice, cognition, and emotions. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 39, 45–69.Google Scholar
Schino, G. & Aureli, F. 2010a. The relative roles of kinship and reciprocity in explaining primate altruism. Ecology Letters, 13, 45–50.Google Scholar
Schino, G. & Aureli, F. 2010b. A few misunderstandings about reciprocal altruism. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 3, 561–563.Google Scholar
Schino, G. & Aureli, F. 2010c. Primate reciprocity and its cognitive requirements. Evolutionary Anthropology, 19, 130–135.Google Scholar
Schino, G. & Aureli, F. 2017. Reciprocity in group-living animals: partner control versus partner choice. Biological Reviews, 92, 665–672.Google Scholar
Schino, G. & Pellegrini, B. 2009. Grooming in mandrills and the time frame of reciprocal partner choice. American Journal of Primatology, 71, 884–888.Google Scholar
Schino, G. & Pellegrini, B. 2011. Grooming and the expectation of reciprocation in mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). International Journal of Primatology, 32, 406–414.Google Scholar
Schino, G., Ventura, R. & Troisi, A. 2003. Grooming among female Japanese macaques: distinguishing between reciprocation and interchange. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 887–891.Google Scholar
Schino, G., Di Sorrentino, E.P. & Tiddi, B. 2007. Grooming and coalitions in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata): partner choice and the time frame of reciprocation. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121, 181–188.Google Scholar
Schino, G., Di Giuseppe, F. & Visalberghi, E. 2009. The time frame of partner choice in the grooming reciprocation of Cebus apella. Ethology, 115, 70–76.Google Scholar
Schjelderup-Ebbe, T. 1935. Social behavior of birds. In Murchison, C.A. & Allee, W.C. (eds), A Handbook of Social Psychology, pp. 947–972. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
Schluter, D. & Grant, P.R. 1984. Determinants of morphological patterns in communities of Darwin’s finches. The American Naturalist, 123, 175–196.Google Scholar
Schmelz, M., Grueneisen, S., Kabalak, A., Jost, J. & Tomasello, M. 2017. Chimpanzees return favors at a personal cost. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 7462–7467.Google Scholar
Schmelz, M., Grueneisen, S. & Tomasello, M. 2020. The psychological mechanisms underlying reciprocal prosociality in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 134, 149–157.Google Scholar
Schmid, J. 1998. Tree holes used for resting by gray mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus) in Madagascar: insulation capacities and energetic consequences. International Journal of Primatology, 19, 797–809.Google Scholar
Schmid, R., Schneeberger, K. & Taborsky, M. 2017. Feel good, do good? Disentangling reciprocity from unconditional prosociality. Ethology, 123, 640–647.Google Scholar
Schmidt, K. & Kuijper, D.P. 2015. A ‘death trap’ in the landscape of fear. Mammal Research, 60, 275–284.Google Scholar
Schneeberger, K., Dietz, M. & Taborsky, M. 2012. Reciprocal cooperation between unrelated rats depends on cost to donor and benefit to recipient. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 12, 41.Google Scholar
Schneeberger, K., Röder, G. & Taborsky, M. 2020. The smell of hunger: Norway rats provision social partners based on odour cues of need. PLoS Biology, 18, e3000628.Google Scholar
Schneider-Orelli, O. 1913. Untersuchungen über den pilzzüchtenden Obstbaumborkenkäfer Xyleborus (Anisandrus) dispar und seinen Nährpilz. Centralblatt für Bakteriologie und Parasitenkunde, 38, 25–110.Google Scholar
Schoener, T.W. 1983. Field experiments on interspecific competition. The American Naturalist, 122, 240–285.Google Scholar
Schoener, T.W. 1987. Time budgets and territory size: some simultaneous optimization models for energy maximizers. American Zoologist, 27, 259–291.Google Scholar
Schonmann, R.H. & Boyd, R. 2016. A simple rule for the evolution of contingent cooperation in large groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150099.Google Scholar
Schonmann, R.H., Vicente, R. & Caticha, N. 2013. Altruism can proliferate through population viscosity despite high random gene flow. PLoS One, 8, e72043.Google Scholar
Schrader, E. 1993. Untersuchungen zum Brutparasitismus von Fiederbartwelsen. DATZ, 46, 426–434.Google Scholar
Schradin, C. 2019. Alternative reproductive tactics. In Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior, pp. 1–11. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Schradin, C. & Lindholm, A.K. 2011. Relative fitness of alternative male reproductive tactics in a mammal varies between years. Journal of Animal Ecology, 80, 908–917.Google Scholar
Schreier, T. 2013. Punishment motivates subordinate helper to pay to stay and to compensate after a period of reduced helping. BSc thesis, University of Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Schuster, R. 2002. Cooperative coordination as a social behavior – experiments with an animal model. Human Nature – An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective, 13, 47–83.Google Scholar
Schuster, R. & Perelberg, A. 2004. Why cooperate? An economic perspective is not enough. Behavioural Processes, 66, 261–277.Google Scholar
Schusterman, R.J. & Berkson, G. 1962. Reciprocal food sharing of gibbons. American Zoologist, 2, 556.Google Scholar
Schürch, R. & Heg, D. 2010a. Life history and behavioral type in the highly social cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 588–598.Google Scholar
Schürch, R. & Heg, D. 2010b. Variation in helper type affects group stability and reproductive decisions in a cooperative breeder. Ethology, 116, 257–269.Google Scholar
Schürch, R. & Taborsky, B. 2005. The functional significance of buccal feeding in the mouthbrooding cichlid Tropheus moorii. Behaviour, 142, 265–281.Google Scholar
Schürch, R., Rothenberger, S. & Heg, D. 2010. The building-up of social relationships: behavioural types, social networks and cooperative breeding in a cichlid. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 365, 4089–4098.Google Scholar
Schütz, D., Parker, G.A., Taborsky, M. & Sato, T. 2006. An optimality approach to male and female body sizes in an extremely size-dimorphic cichlid fish. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 8, 1393–1408.Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, M.K. & Call, J. 2019a. Reciprocity: different behavioural strategies, cognitive mechanisms and psychological processes. Learning & Behavior, 47, 284–301.Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, M.K. & Call, J. 2019b. Revisiting the possibility of reciprocal help in non-human primates. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 104, 73–86.Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, M.K. & Taborsky, M. 2016. No evidence for audience effects in reciprocal cooperation of Norway rats. Ethology, 122, 513–521.Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, M.K. & Taborsky, M. 2017. The transfer of alternative tasks in reciprocal cooperation. Animal Behaviour, 131, 35–41.Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, M.K. & Taborsky, M. 2018a. Relatedness decreases and reciprocity increases cooperation in Norway rats. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 285, 20180035.Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, M.K. & Taborsky, M. 2018b. Reciprocal trading of different commodities in Norway rats. Current Biology, 28, 594–599.Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, M.K. & Taborsky, M. 2018c. Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) communicate need, which elicits donation of food. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 132, 119–129.Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, M.K. & Taborsky, M. 2020. Rats play tit-for-tat instead of integrating social experience over multiple interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 287, 20192423.Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, M.K., Stieger, B. & Taborsky, M. 2017a. Experimental evidence for reciprocity in allogrooming among wild-type Norway rats. Scientific Reports, 7, 4010.Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, M.K., Neuenschwander, J., Engqvist, L., et al. 2017b. Do female Norway rats form social bonds? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71, 98.Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, M.K., Aeschbacher, J., Santi, M. & Taborsky, M. 2019. Male Norway rats cooperate according to direct but not generalized reciprocity rules. Animal Behaviour, 152, 93–101.Google Scholar
Scott, D.K. 1980. Functional aspects of prolonged parental care in Bewick’s swans. Animal Behaviour, 28, 938–952.Google Scholar
Searcy, W.A. & Nowicki, S. 2005. The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sefc, K.M. 2011. Mating and parental care in Lake Tanganyika’s cichlids. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2011, 470875.Google Scholar
Segelbacher, G., Wegge, P., Sivkov, A.V. & Höglund, J. 2007. Kin groups in closely spaced capercaillie leks. Journal of Ornithology, 148, 79–84.Google Scholar
Segers, F.H.I.D. & Taborsky, B. 2012. Competition level determines compensatory growth abilities. Behavioral Ecology, 23, 665–671.Google Scholar
Seinen, I. & Schram, A. 2006. Social status and group norms: indirect reciprocity in a repeated helping experiment. European Economic Review, 50, 581–602.Google Scholar
Sella, G. 1985. Reciprocal egg trading and brood care in a hermaphroditic polychaete worm. Animal Behaviour, 33, 938–944.Google Scholar
Sella, G. 1988. Reciprocation, reproductive success, and safeguards against cheating in a hermaphroditic polychaete worm, Ophryotrocha diadema Akesson, 1976. Biological Bulletin, 175, 212–217.Google Scholar
Sella, G. & Lorenzi, M.C. 2000. Partner fidelity and egg reciprocation in the simultaneously hermaphroditic polychaete worm Ophryotrocha diadema. Behavioral Ecology, 11, 260–264.Google Scholar
Sella, G., Premoli, M.C. & Turri, F. 1997. Egg trading in the simultaneously hermaphroditic polychaete worm Ophryotrocha gracilis (Huth). Behavioral Ecology, 8, 83–86.Google Scholar
Semel, B. & Sherman, P.W. 2001. Intraspecific parasitism and nest-site competition in wood ducks. Animal Behaviour, 61, 787–803.Google Scholar
Semmann, D., Krambeck, H.J. & Milinski, M. 2005. Reputation is valuable within and outside one’s own social group. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57, 611–616.Google Scholar
Semple, K., Wayne, R.K. & Gibson, R.M. 2001. Microsatellite analysis of female mating behaviour in lek-breeding sage grouse. Molecular Ecology, 10, 2043–2048.Google Scholar
Seppä, P., Queller, D.C. & Strassmann, J.E. 2012. Why wasp foundresses change nests: relatedness, dominance, and nest quality. PLoS One, 7, e45386.Google Scholar
Sergio, F. & Bogliani, G. 2001. Nest defense as parental care in the northern hobby (Falco subbuteo). The Auk, 118, 1047–1053.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R.M. 1976. Social relationships among adult female baboons. Animal Behaviour, 24, 917–938.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R.M. 1977. Model of social grooming among adult female monkeys. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 65, 671–698.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R.M. & Cheney, D.L. 1984. Grooming, alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys. Nature, 308, 541–543.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R.M. & Cheney, D.L. 1988. Empirical tests of reciprocity theory – problems in assessment. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 181–187.Google Scholar
Shapiro, D.Y., Hensley, D.A. & Appeldoorn, R.S. 1988. Pelagic spawning and egg transport in coral-reef fishes – a skeptical overview. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 22, 3–14.Google Scholar
Sharp, S.P. & Clutton-Brock, T.H. 2011. Reluctant challengers: why do subordinate female meerkats rarely displace their dominant mothers? Behavioral Ecology, 22, 1337–1343.Google Scholar
Sharp, S.P., McGowan, A., Wood, M.J. & Hatchwell, B.J. 2005. Learned kin recognition cues in a social bird. Nature, 434, 1127.Google Scholar
Sharp, S.P., Simeoni, M. & Hatchwell, B.J. 2008. Dispersal of sibling coalitions promotes helping among immigrants in a cooperatively breeding bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2125–2130.Google Scholar
Sharpe, R.V. & Aviles, L. 2016. Prey size and scramble vs. contest competition in a social spider: implications for population dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology, 85, 1401–1410.Google Scholar
Shaw, J.J., Tregenza, T., Parker, G.A. & Harvey, I.F. 1995. Evolutionarily stable foraging speeds in feeding scrambles: a model and an experimental test. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 260, 273–-277.Google Scholar
Sheehan, M.J. & Tibbetts, E.A. 2008. Robust long-term social memories in a paper wasp. Current Biology, 18, R851–R852.Google Scholar
Sheehan, M.J. & Tibbetts, E.A. 2010. Selection for individual recognition and the evolution of polymorphic identity signals in Polistes paper wasps. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23, 570–577.Google Scholar
Sheehan, M.J. & Tibbetts, E.A. 2011. Specialized face learning is associated with individual recognition in paper wasps. Science, 334, 1272–1275.Google Scholar
Sheehan, M.J., Botero, C.A., Hendry, T.A., et al. 2015. Different axes of environmental variation explain the presence vs. extent of cooperative nest founding associations in Polistes paper wasps. Ecology Letters, 18, 1057–1067.Google Scholar
Sheldon, B.C. 2002. Relating paternity to paternal care. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 357, 341–350.Google Scholar
Shelly, T.E. 2001. Lek size and female visitation in two species of tephritid fruit flies. Animal Behaviour, 62, 33–40.Google Scholar
Shen, S.F., Vehrencamp, S.L., Johnstone, R.A., et al. 2012. Unfavourable environment limits social conflict in Yuhina brunneiceps. Nature Communications, 3, 885.Google Scholar
Shen, S., Emlen, S.T., Koenig, W.D. & Rubenstein, D.R. 2017. The ecology of cooperative breeding behaviour. Ecology Letters, 20, 708–720.Google Scholar
Sheppard, C.E., Marshall, H.H., Inger, R., et al. 2018. Decoupling of genetic and cultural inheritance in a wild mammal. Current Biology, 28, 1846–1850.Google Scholar
Sherley, G.H. 1990. Co-operative breeding in riflemen (Acanthissitta chloris) benefits to parents, offspring and helpers. Behaviour, 112, 1–22.Google Scholar
Sherman, C.D.H., Wapstra, E., Uller, T. & Olsson, M. 2008. Males with high genetic similarity to females sire more offspring in sperm competition in Peron’s tree frog Litoria peronii. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 275, 971–978.Google Scholar
Sherman, P.W. 1977. Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls. Science, 197, 1246–1253.Google Scholar
Sherman, P.W., Reeve, H. & Pfennig, D. 1997. Recognition systems. In Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. (eds), Behavioural Ecology (4th ed.), pp. 69–96. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Shorey, L. 2002. Mating success on white-bearded manakin (Manacus manacus) leks: male characteristics and relatedness. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 52, 451–457.Google Scholar
Shorey, L., Piertney, S., Stone, J. & Höglund, J. 2000. Fine-scale genetic structuring on Manacus manacus leks. Nature, 408, 352.Google Scholar
Shorter, J.R. & Rueppell, O. 2012. A review on self-destructive defense behaviors in social insects. Insectes Sociaux, 59(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Shrader, A.M., Brown, J.S., Kerley, G.I. & Kotler, B.P. 2008. Do free-ranging domestic goats show ‘landscapes of fear’? Patch use in response to habitat features and predator cues. Journal of Arid Environments, 72, 1811–1819.Google Scholar
Shuster, S.M. & Sassaman, C. 1997. Genetic interaction between male mating strategy and sex ratio in a marine isopod. Nature, 388, 373–377.Google Scholar
Shuster, S.M. & Wade, M.J. 1991. Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod. Nature, 350, 608–610.Google Scholar
Shutt, K., MacLarnon, A., Heistermann, M. & Semple, S. 2007. Grooming in Barbary macaques: better to give than to receive? Biology Letters, 3, 231–233.Google Scholar
Sicardi, E.A., Fort, H., Vainstein, M.H. & Arenzon, J.J. 2009. Random mobility and spatial structure often enhance cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 256, 240–246.Google Scholar
Sigmund, K. 2010. The Calculus of Selfishness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sih, A., Hanser, S.F. & McHugh, K.A. 2009. Social network theory: new insights and issues for behavioral ecologists. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63, 975–988.Google Scholar
Sikkel, P.C. 1989. Egg presence and developmental stage influence spawning-site choice by female garibaldi. Animal Behaviour, 38, 447–456.Google Scholar
Silberberg, A., Allouch, C., Sandfort, S., et al. 2014. Desire for social contact, not empathy, may explain ‘rescue’ behavior in rats. Animal Cognition, 17, 609–618.Google Scholar
Silk, J.B. 1992. The patterning of intervention among male bonnet macaques – reciprocity, revenge, and loyalty. Current Anthropology, 33, 318–325.Google Scholar
Silk, J.B. 2007. The strategic dynamics of cooperation in primate groups. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 37, 1–41.Google Scholar
Silk, J.B., Seyfarth, R.M. & Cheney, D.L. 1999. The structure of social relationships among female savanna baboons in Moremi Reserve, Botswana. Behaviour, 136, 679–703.Google Scholar
Silk, J.B., Rendall, D., Cheney, D.L. & Seyfarth, R.M. 2003. Natal attraction in adult female baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) in the Moremi Reserve, Botswana. Ethology, 109, 627–644.Google Scholar
Silk, J.B., Brosnan, S.F., Henrich, J., Lambeth, S.P. & Shapiro, S. 2013. Chimpanzees share food for many reasons: the role of kinship, reciprocity, social bonds and harassment on food transfers. Animal Behaviour, 85, 941–947.Google Scholar
Simmons, L.W. & Kotiaho, J.S. 2007. The effects of reproduction on courtship, fertility and longevity within and between alternative male mating tactics of the horned beetle, Onthophagus binodis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 488–495.Google Scholar
Sinervo, B. & Clobert, J. 2003. Morphs, dispersal behavior, genetic similarity, and the evolution of cooperation. Science, 300, 1949–1951.Google Scholar
Sinervo, B., Chaine, A., Clobert, J., et al. 2006. Self-recognition, color signals, and cycles of greenbeard mutualism and altruism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 7372–7377.Google Scholar
Singh, M. & Boomsma, J.J. 2015. Policing and punishment across the domains of social evolution. Oikos, 124, 971–982.Google Scholar
Skjærvø, G.R. & Røskaft, E. 2013. Menopause: no support for an evolutionary explanation among historical Norwegians. Experimental Gerontology, 48, 408–413.Google Scholar
Slater, K.Y., Schaffner, C.M. & Aureli, F. 2007. Embraces for infant handling in spider monkeys: evidence for a biological market? Animal Behaviour, 74, 455–461.Google Scholar
Smiseth, P.T. 2019. Coordination, cooperation and conflict between caring parents in burying beetles. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 397.Google Scholar
Smith, C. & Wootton, R.J. 1994. The cost of parental care in Haplochromis ‘argens’ (Cichlidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes, 40, 99–104.Google Scholar
Smith, C. & Wootton, R.J. 1995. The costs of parental care in teleost fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 5, 7–22.Google Scholar
Smith, J.E. 2014. Hamilton’s legacy: kinship, cooperation and social tolerance in mammalian groups. Animal Behaviour, 92, 291–304.Google Scholar
Smith, S.M., Kent, D.S., Boomsma, J.J. & Stow, A.J. 2018. Monogamous sperm storage and permanent worker sterility in a long-lived ambrosia beetle. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2, 1009–1018.Google Scholar
Smyers, S.D., Rubbo, M.J., Townsend, V.R. & Swart, C.C. 2002. Intra- and interspecific characterizations of burrow use and defense by juvenile ambystomatid salamanders. Herpetologica, 58, 422–429.Google Scholar
Sober, E. & Wilson, D.S. 1998. Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Soler, M. 2014. Long-term coevolution between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Biological Reviews, 89, 688–704.Google Scholar
Solomon, N.G. & French, J.A. 1997. Cooperative Breeding in Mammals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sorato, E., Gullett, P.R., Creasey, M.J.S., Griffith, S.C. & Russell, A.F. 2015. Plastic territoriality in group-living chestnut-crowned babblers: roles of resource value, holding potential and predation risk. Animal Behaviour, 101, 155–168.Google Scholar
Spahni, C. 2005. Indirect reciprocity in Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus). MSc thesis, University of Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Spottiswoode, C.N., Begg, K.S. & Begg, C.M. 2016. Reciprocal signaling in honeyguide–human mutualism. Science, 353, 387–389.Google Scholar
Sridhar, H., Beauchamp, G. & Shanker, K. 2009. Why do birds participate in mixed-species foraging flocks? A large-scale synthesis. Animal Behaviour, 78, 337–347.Google Scholar
Sridhar, H., Srinivasan, U., Askins, R.A., et al. 2012. Positive relationships between association strength and phenotypic similarity characterize the assembly of mixed-species bird flocks worldwide. American Naturalist, 180, 777–790.Google Scholar
St-Pierre, A., Larose, K. & Dubois, F. 2009. Long-term social bonds promote cooperation in the iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276, 4223–4228.Google Scholar
Stacey, P.B. & Koenig, W.D. 1990. Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Long Term Studies of Ecology and Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stacey, P.B. & Ligon, J.D. 1987. Territory quality and dispersal options in the acorn woodpecker, and a challenge to the habitat-saturation model of cooperative breeding. The American Naturalist, 130, 654–676.Google Scholar
Stacey, P.B. & Ligon, J.D. 1991. The benefits-of-philopatry hypothesis for the evolution of cooperative breeding: variation in territory quality and group size effects. The American Naturalist, 137, 831–846.Google Scholar
Stadler, B. & Dixon, T. 2008. Mutualism. Ants and Their Insect Partners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stanca, L. 2009. Measuring indirect reciprocity: whose back do we scratch? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 190–202.Google Scholar
Stander, P.E. 1992. Cooperative hunting in lions – the role of the individual. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 29, 445–454.Google Scholar
Stein, A.C. & Uy, J.A. 2005. Plumage brightness predicts male mating success in the lekking golden-collared manakin, Manacus vitellinus. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 41–47.Google Scholar
Steinegger, M. & Taborsky, B. 2007. Asymmetric sexual conflict over parental care in a biparental cichlid. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 933–941.Google Scholar
Steinhart, G.B., Sandrene, M.E., Weaver, S., Stein, R.A. & Marschall, E.A. 2005. Increased parental care cost for nest-guarding fish in a lake with hyperabundant nest predators. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 427–434.Google Scholar
Stephens, D.W., McLinn, C.M. & Stevens, J.R. 2002. Discounting and reciprocity in an iterated prisoner’s dilemma. Science, 298, 2216–2218.Google Scholar
Stevens, J.R. & Gilby, I.C. 2004. A conceptual framework for nonkin food sharing: timing and currency of benefits. Animal Behaviour, 67, 603–614.Google Scholar
Stevens, J.R. & Hauser, M.D. 2004. Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 60–65.Google Scholar
Stevens, J.R., Cushman, F.A. & Hauser, M.D. 2005. Evolving the psychological mechanisms for cooperation. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 36, 499–518.Google Scholar
Stevens, J.R., Volstorf, J., Schooler, L.J., & Rieskamp, J. 2011. Forgetting constrains the emergence of cooperative decision strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 235.Google Scholar
Stieger, B., Schweinfurth, M.K. & Taborsky, M. 2017. Reciprocal allogrooming among unrelated Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) is affected by previously received cooperative, affiliative and aggressive behaviours. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71, 182.Google Scholar
Stilwell, A.R., Smith, S.M., Cognato, A.I., Martinez, M. & Flowers, R.W. 2014. Coptoborus ochromactonus, n. sp. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), an emerging pest of cultivated balsa (Malvales: Malvaceae) in Ecuador. Journal of Economic Entomology, 107, 675–683.Google Scholar
Stiver, K.A. & Alonzo, S.H. 2011. Alloparental care increases mating success. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 206–211.Google Scholar
Stiver, K.A. & Alonzo, S.H. 2013. Does the risk of sperm competition help explain cooperation between reproductive competitors? A study in the ocellated wrasse (Symphodus ocellatus). American Naturalist, 181, 357–368.Google Scholar
Stiver, K.A., Dierkes, P., Taborsky, M. & Balshine, S. 2004. Dispersal patterns and status change in a co-operatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher: evidence from microsatellite analyses and behavioural observations. Journal of Fish Biology, 65, 91–105.Google Scholar
Stiver, K.A., Dierkes, P., Taborsky, M., Gibbs, H.L. & Balshine, S. 2005. Relatedness and helping in fish: examining the theoretical predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272, 1593–1599.Google Scholar
Stiver, K.A., Fitzpatrick, J., Desjardins, J.K. & Balshine, S. 2006. Sex differences in rates of territory joining and inheritance in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish. Animal Behaviour, 71, 449–456.Google Scholar
Stiver, K., Desjardins, J., Fitzpatrick, J., et al. 2007. Evidence for size and sex-specific dispersal in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish. Molecular Ecology, 16, 2974–2984.Google Scholar
Stiver, K., Fitzpatrick, J., Desjardins, J., et al. 2008. The role of genetic relatedness among social mates in a cooperative breeder. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 816–823.Google Scholar
Stiver, K.A., Wolff, S.H. & Alonzo, S.H. 2012. Adoption and cuckoldry lead to alloparental care in the tessellated darter (Etheostoma olmstedi), a non-group-living species with no evidence of nest site limitation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66, 855–864.Google Scholar
Stockley, P. & Bro-Jørgensen, J. 2011. Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals. Biological Reviews, 86, 34–366.Google Scholar
Stojkoski, V., Utkovski, Z., Basnarkov, L. & Kocarev, L. 2018. Cooperation dynamics of generalized reciprocity in state-based social dilemmas. Physical Review E, 97, 052305.Google Scholar
Stokes, A.W. 1971. Parental and courtship feeding in red jungle fowl. The Auk, 88, 21–29.Google Scholar
Stokkebo, S. & Hardy, I.C. 2000. The importance of being gravid: egg load and contest outcome in a parasitoid wasp. Animal Behaviour, 59, 1111–1118.Google Scholar
Stopka, P. & Graciasova, R. 2001. Conditional allogrooming in the herb-field mouse. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 584–589.Google Scholar
Storey, A., Wilhelm, S. & Walsh, C. 2020. Negotiation of parental duties in chick-rearing common murres (Uria aalge) in different foraging conditions. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 506.Google Scholar
Strickland, D. 1991. Juvenile dispersal in gray jays: dominant brood member expels siblings from natal territory. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69, 2935–2945.Google Scholar
Stutt, A.D. & Siva-Jothy, M.T. 2001. Traumatic insemination and sexual conflict in the bed bug Cimex lectularius. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 5683–5687.Google Scholar
Suchak, M. & de Waal, F.B.M. 2012. Monkeys benefit from reciprocity without the cognitive burden. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 15191–15196.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Y. 1971. Characteristics of the social life of bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata). Primates, 12, 247–266.Google Scholar
Suhonen, J. 1993a. Risk of predation and foraging sites of individuals in mixed-species tit flocks. Animal Behaviour, 45, 1193–1198.Google Scholar
Suhonen, J. 1993b. Predation risk influences the use of foraging sites by tits. Ecology, 74, 1197–1203.Google Scholar
Suhonen, J., Ilvonen, J.J., Nyman, T. & Sorvari, J. 2019. Brood parasitism in eusocial insects (Hymenoptera): role of host geographical range size and phylogeny. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 374, 20180203.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F.J. & Kleindorfer, S. 2013. Adaptive divergence in Darwin’s small ground finch (Geospiza fuliginosa): divergent selection along a cline. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 110, 45–59.Google Scholar
Sumana, A. & Starks, P.T. 2004. The function of dart behavior in the paper wasp, Polistes fuscatus. Naturwissenschaften, 91, 220–223.Google Scholar
Sumpter, D.J.T. 2006. The principles of collective animal behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 361, 5–22.Google Scholar
Surbeck, M. & Hohmann, G. 2015. Social preferences influence the short-term exchange of social grooming among male bonobos. Animal Cognition, 18, 573–579.Google Scholar
Surridge, A.K., Bell, D.J. & Hewitt, G.M. 1999. From population structure to individual behaviour: genetic analysis of social structure in the European wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 68, 57–71.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W.J. 1983. Aggregation and the ideal ‘free’ distribution. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 821–828.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S. 2013. Biparental care in insects: paternal care, life history, and the function of the nest. Journal of Insect Science, 13, 131.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S. & Kimura, H. 2011. Oscillatory dynamics in the coevolution of cooperation and mobility. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 287, 42–47.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S. & Kimura, H. 2013. Indirect reciprocity is sensitive to costs of information transfer. Scientific Reports, 3, 1435.Google Scholar
Svanbäck, R. & Bolnick, D.I. 2005. Intraspecific competition affects the strength of individual specialization: an optimal diet theory method. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 7, 993–1012.Google Scholar
Svensson, B.G. & Petersson, E. 1994. Mate choice tactics and swarm size: a model and a test in a dance fly. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 35, 161–168.Google Scholar
Syrop, S. 1974. Three selected aspects of the territorial behavior of a pomacentrid fish, Pomacentrus jenkinsi. Master’s thesis, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Szabo, G. & Fath, G. 2007. Evolutionary games on graphs. Physics Reports, 446, 97–216.Google Scholar
Számadó, S. 2008. How threat displays work: species-specific fighting techniques, weaponry and proximity risk. Animal Behaviour, 76, 1455–1463.Google Scholar
Számadó, S. 2011. Long-term commitment promotes honest status signalling. Animal Behaviour, 82, 295–302.Google Scholar
Szathmáry, E. 2015. Toward major evolutionary transitions theory 2.0. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 10104–10111.Google Scholar
Szekely, T., Weissing, F.J. & Komdeur, J. 2014. Adult sex ratio variation: implications for breeding system evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 27, 1500–1512.Google Scholar
Szolnoki, A., Wang, Z. & Perc, M. 2012. Wisdom of groups promotes cooperation in evolutionary social dilemmas. Scientific Reports, 2, 576.Google Scholar
Taborsky, B. 2006. The influence of juvenile and adult environments on life-history trajectories. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273, 741–750.Google Scholar
Taborsky, B. & Oliveira, R.F. 2012. Social competence: an evolutionary approach. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 679–688.Google Scholar
Taborsky, B., Skubic, E. & Bruintjes, R. 2007. Mothers adjust egg size to helper number in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Behavioral Ecology, 18, 652–657.Google Scholar
Taborsky, B., Arnold, C., Junker, J. & Tschopp, A. 2012. The early social environment affects social competence in a cooperative breeder. Animal Behaviour, 83, 1067–1074.Google Scholar
Taborsky, B., Tschirren, L., Meunier, C. & Aubin-Horth, N. 2013. Stable reprogramming of brain transcription profiles by the early social environment in a cooperatively breeding fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 280, 20122605.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. 1984. Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: their costs and benefits. Animal Behaviour, 32, 1236–1252.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. 1985. Breeder–helper conflict in a cichlid fish with broodcare helpers: an experimental analysis. Behaviour, 95, 45–75.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. 1994. Sneakers, satellites, and helpers: parasitic and cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 23, 1–100.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. 1998. Sperm competition in fish: ‘bourgeois’ males and parasitic spawning. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 222–227.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. 2001. The evolution of bourgeois, parasitic, and cooperative reproductive behaviors in fishes. Journal of Heredity, 92, 100–110.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. 2007. Cooperation built the Tower of Babel. Behavioural Processes, 76, 95–99.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. 2008. Alternative reproductive tactics in fish. In Oliveira, R.F., Taborsky, M. & Brockmann, H.J. (eds), Alternative Reproductive Tactics. An Integrative Approach, pp. 251–299. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. 2009. Reproductive skew in cooperative fish groups: virtue and limitations of alternative modeling approaches. In Hager, R. & Jones, C. (eds), Reproductive Skew in Vertebrates: Proximate and Ultimate Causes, pp. 265–304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. 2013. Social evolution: reciprocity there is. Current Biology, 23, R486–R488.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. 2014. Tribute to Tinbergen: the four problems of biology. A critical appraisal. Ethology, 120, 224–227.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. 2016. Cichlid fishes: a model for the integrative study of social behavior. In Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. (eds), Cooperative Breeding in Vertebrates, pp. 272–293. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. & Brockmann, H.J. 2010. Alternative reproductive tactics and life history phenotypes. In Kappeler, P. (ed.), Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms, pp. 537–586. Heidelberg Springer.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. & Grantner, A. 1998. Behavioural time-energy budgets of cooperatively breeding Neolamprologus pulcher (Pisces: Cichlidae). Animal Behaviour, 56, 1375–1382.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. & Limberger, D. 1981. Helpers in fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 8, 143–145.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. & Riebli, T. 2020. Coaction vs. reciprocal cooperation among unrelated individuals in social cichlids. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 515.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. & Taborsky, B. 2015. Evolution of genetic and physiological mechanisms of cooperative behaviour. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 6, 132–138.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. & Wong, M. 2017. Sociality in fishes. In Rubenstein, D.R. & Abbot, P. (eds), Comparative Social Evolution, pp. 354–389. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M., Hert, E., Siemens, M. & Stoerig, P. 1986. Social behaviour of Lamprologus species: functions and mechanisms. Annales du Musee Royale de l’Afrique Centrale Serie 8: Sciences Zoologique (Tervuren, Belgium), 251, 7–11.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M., Hudde, B. & Wirtz, P. 1987. Reproductive behaviour and ecology of Symphodus (Crenilabrus) ocellatus, a European wrasse with four types of male behaviour. Behaviour, 102, 82–118.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M., Oliveira, R.F. & Brockmann, H.J. 2008. The evolution of alternative reproductive tactics: concepts and questions. In Oliveira, R.F., Taborsky, M. & Brockmann, H.J. (eds), Alternative Reproductive Tactics: An Integrative Approach, pp. 1–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M., Hofmann, H.A., Beery, A.K., et al. 2015. Taxon matters: promoting integrative studies of social behavior. Trends in Neurosciences, 38, 189–191.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M., Frommen, J.G. & Riehl, C. 2016. Correlated pay-offs are key to cooperation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150084.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M., Schütz, D., Goffinet, O. & van Doorn, G.S. 2018. Alternative male morphs solve sperm performance/longevity trade-off in opposite directions. Science Advances, 4, eaap8563.Google Scholar
Takahashi, M., Suzuki, N. & Koga, T. 2001. Burrow defense behaviors in a sand-bubbler crab: Scopimera globosa, in relation to body size and prior residence. Journal of Ethology, 19, 93–96.Google Scholar
Takezawa, M. & Price, M.E. 2010. Revisiting ‘the evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups’: continuous reciprocity in the repeated n-person prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 264, 188–196.Google Scholar
Tallamy, D.W. 1985. ‘Egg dumping’ in lace bugs (Gargaphia solani, Hemiptera; Tingidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 17, 357–362.Google Scholar
Tan, L. & Hackenberg, T.D. 2016. Functional analysis of mutual behavior in laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 130, 13–23.Google Scholar
Tanaka, H., Heg, D., Takeshima, H., et al. 2015. Group composition, relatedness, and dispersal in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus obscurus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 69, 169–181.Google Scholar
Tanaka, H., Frommen, J.G., Takahashi, T. & Kohda, M. 2016. Predation risk promotes delayed dispersal in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus obscurus. Animal Behaviour, 117, 51–58.Google Scholar
Tanaka, H., Frommen, J.G. & Kohda, M. 2018a. Helpers increase food abundance in the territory of a cooperatively breeding fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 72, 52.Google Scholar
Tanaka, H., Kohda, M. & Frommen, J.G. 2018b. Helpers increase the reproductive success of breeders in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus obscurus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 72, 152.Google Scholar
Tanaka, H., Frommen, J.G., Engqvist, L. & Kohda, M. 2018c. Task-dependent workload adjustment of female breeders in a cooperatively breeding fish. Behavioral Ecology, 29, 221–229.Google Scholar
Tanaka, H., Frommen, J.G., Koblmuller, S., et al. 2018d. Evolutionary transitions to cooperative societies in fishes revisited. Ethology, 124, 777–789.Google Scholar
Tang-Martinez, Z. 2001. The mechanisms of kin discrimination and the evolution of kin recognition in vertebrates: a critical re-evaluation. Behavioural Processes, 53, 21–40.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.D. 1988. An inclusive fitness model for dispersal of offspring. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 130, 363–378.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.D. 1990. Allele-frequency change in a class-structured population. The American Naturalist, 135, 95–106.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.D. 1992a. Altruism in viscous populations – an inclusive fitness model. Evolutionary Ecology, 6, 352–356.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.D. 1992b. Inclusive fitness in a homogeneous environment. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 249, 299–302.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.D. & Day, T. 2004. Stability in negotiation games and the emergence of cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 271, 669–674.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.D. & Frank, S.A. 1996. How to make a kin selection model. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 180, 27–37.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.D. & Jonker, L.B. 1978. Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences, 40, 145–156.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.D., Day, T. & Wild, G. 2007a. Evolution of cooperation in a finite homogeneous graph. Nature, 447, 469–472.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.D., Wild, G. & Gardner, A. 2007b. Direct fitness or inclusive fitness: how shall we model kin selection? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 301–309.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.W. & Elwood, R.W. 2003. The mismeasure of animal contests. Animal Behaviour, 65, 1195–1202.Google Scholar
Tebbich, S., Taborsky, M. & Winkler, H. 1996. Social manipulation causes cooperation in keas. Animal Behaviour, 52, 1–10.Google Scholar
Teichroeb, J.A. & Sicotte, P. 2018. Cascading competition: the seasonal strength of scramble influences between-group contest in a folivorous primate. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 72, 6.Google Scholar
Telle, H.-J. 1965. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Verhaltensweise von Ratten, vergleichend dargestellt bei Rattus norvegicus und Rattus rattus. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Zoologie, 53, 129–196.Google Scholar
Temple, H.J., Hoffman, J.I. & Amos, W. 2006. Dispersal, philopatry and intergroup relatedness: fine-scale genetic structure in the white-breasted thrasher, Ramphocinclus brachyurus. Molecular Ecology, 15, 3449–3458.Google Scholar
Temple, H.J., Hoffman, J.I. & Amos, W. 2009. Group structure, mating system and extra-group paternity in the co-operatively breeding white-breasted thrasher Ramphocinclus brachyurus. Ibis, 151, 99–112.Google Scholar
Templeton, J.J. & Giraldeau, L.A. 1995. Patch assessment in foraging flocks of european starlings – evidence for the use of public information. Behavioral Ecology, 6, 65–72.Google Scholar
Terry, R.L. 1970. Primate grooming as a tension reduction mechanism. Journal of Psychology, 76, 129–136.Google Scholar
Teunissen, N., Kingma, S.A., Hall, M.L., et al. 2018. More than kin: subordinates foster strong bonds with relatives and potential mates in a social bird. Behavioral Ecology, 29, 1316–1324.Google Scholar
Thayer, B.A. 2004. Darwin and International Relations: On the Evolutionary Origins of War and Ethnic Conflict. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Theberge, J.B. & Wedeles, C.H.R. 1989. Prey selection and habitat partitioning in sympatric coyote and red fox populations, southwest Yukon. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 67, 1285–1290.Google Scholar
Theimer, T.C. 1987. The effect of seed dispersion on the foraging success of dominant and subordinate dark-eyed juncos, Junco hyemalis. Animal Behaviour, 35, 1883–1890.Google Scholar
Thomas, L.K. & Manica, A. 2003. Filial cannibalism in an assassin bug. Animal Behaviour, 66, 205–210.Google Scholar
Thomas, M.L., Makrisâ, C.M., Suarez, A.V., Tsutsui, N.D. & Holway, D.A. 2006. When supercolonies collide: territorial aggression in an invasive and unicolonial social insect. Molecular Ecology, 15, 4303–4315.Google Scholar
Thompson, F.J. & Cant, M.A. 2018. Dynamic conflict among heterogeneous groups: a comment on Christensen and Radford. Behavioral Ecology, 29, 1016–1017.Google Scholar
Thompson, F.J., Donaldson, L., Johnstone, R.A., Field, J. & Cant, M.A. 2014. Dominant aggression as a deterrent signal in paper wasps. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 706–715.Google Scholar
Thompson, F.J., Marshall, H.H., Sanderson, J.L., et al. 2016. Reproductive competition triggers mass eviction in cooperative banded mongooses. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 283, 20152607.Google Scholar
Thompson, F.J., Cant, M.A., Marshall, H.H., et al. 2017a. Explaining negative kin discrimination in a cooperative mammal society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 5207–5212.Google Scholar
Thompson, F.J., Marshall, H.H., Vitikainen, E.I. & Cant, M.A. 2017b. Causes and consequences of intergroup conflict in cooperative banded mongooses. Animal Behaviour, 126, 31–40.Google Scholar
Thompson, F.J., Marshall, H.H., Vitikainen, E.I.K., Young, A.J. & Cant, M.A. 2017c. Individual and demographic consequences of mass eviction in cooperative banded mongooses. Animal Behaviour, 134, 103–112.Google Scholar
Thompson, F.J., Hunt, K.L., Wright, K., et al. 2020. Who goes there? Social surveillance as a response to intergroup conflict in a primitive termite. Biology Letters, 16, 20200131.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.N. 1994. The Coevolutionary Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thorne, B.L. 1997. Evolution of eusociality in termites. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 27–54.Google Scholar
Thorne, B.L., Breisch, N.L. & Muscedere, M.L. 2003. Evolution of eusociality and the soldier caste in termites: influence of intraspecific competition and accelerated inheritance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 12808–12813.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W.H. 1956. Learning and Instinct in Animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thresher, R.E. 1976. Field analysis of the territoriality of the threespot damselfish, Eupomacentrus planifrons (Pomacentridae). Copeia, 1976, 266–276.Google Scholar
Thünken, T., Bakker, T.C., Baldauf, S.A. & Kullmann, H. 2007. Active inbreeding in a cichlid fish and its adaptive significance. Current Biology, 17, 225–229.Google Scholar
Thünken, T., Meuthen, D., Bakker, T.C. & Baldauf, S.A. 2012. A sex-specific trade-off between mating preferences for genetic compatibility and body size in a cichlid fish with mutual mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 279, 20120333.Google Scholar
Thünken, T., Eigster, M. & Frommen, J.G. 2014a. Context-dependent group size preferences in large shoals of three-spined sticklebacks. Animal Behaviour, 90, 205–210.Google Scholar
Thünken, T., Bakker, T.C. & Baldauf, S.A. 2014b. Armpit effect in an African cichlid fish: self-referent kin recognition in mating decisions of male Pelvicachromis taeniatus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 68, 99–104.Google Scholar
Tibbetts, E.A. & Dale, J. 2004. A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp. Nature, 432, 218–222.Google Scholar
Tibbetts, E.A. & Reeve, H.K. 2000. Aggression and resource sharing among foundresses in the social wasp Polistes dominulus: testing transactional theories of conflict. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48, 344–352.Google Scholar
Tibbetts, E.A. & Sheehan, M.J. 2013. Individual recognition and the evolution of learning and memory in Polistes paper wasps. In Menzel, E. & Benjamin, P.R. (eds), Invertebrate Learning and Memory (Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience Volume 22), pp. 561–571. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tibbetts, E.A., Skaldina, O., Zhao, V., et al. 2011. Geographic variation in the status signals of Polistes dominulus paper wasps. PLoS One, 6, e28173.Google Scholar
Tibbetts, E.A., Agudelo, J., Pandit, S. & Riojas, J. 2019. Transitive inference in Polistes paper wasps. Biology Letters, 15, 20190015.Google Scholar
Tiddi, B., Aureli, F. & Schino, G. 2010. Grooming for infant handling in tufted capuchin monkeys: a reappraisal of the primate infant market. Animal Behaviour, 79, 1115–1123.Google Scholar
Tiddi, B., Aureli, F., di Sorrentino, E.P., Janson, C.H. & Schino, G. 2011. Grooming for tolerance? Two mechanisms of exchange in wild tufted capuchin monkeys. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 663–669.Google Scholar
Tiedemann, R. & Noer, H. 1998. Geographic partitioning of mitochondrial DNA patterns in European eider Somateria mollissima. Hereditas, 128, 159–166.Google Scholar
Timms, S., Ferro, D.N. & Emberson, R.M. 1982. Andropolymorphism and its heritability in Sancassania berlesei (Michael) (Acari: Acaridae). Acarologia, 22, 391–398.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. 1963. On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie – Journal of Comparative Ethology, 20, 410–433.Google Scholar
Tittle, C.R. & Rowe, A.R. 1974. Certainty of arrest and crime rates: a further test of the deterrence hypothesis. Social Forces, 52, 455–462.Google Scholar
Tolker-Nielsen, T. & Molin, S. 2000. Spatial organization of microbial biofilm communities. Microbial Ecology, 40, 75–84.Google Scholar
Tomkins, J.L. & Brown, G.S. 2004. Population density drives the local evolution of a threshold dimorphism. Nature, 431, 1099.Google Scholar
Tomkins, J.L., LeBas, N.R., Unrug, J. & Radwan, J. 2004. Testing the status-dependent ESS model: population variation in fighter expression in the mite Sancassania berlesei. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17, 1377–1388.Google Scholar
Toobaie, A. & Grant, J.W. 2013. Effect of food abundance on aggressiveness and territory size of juvenile rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Animal Behaviour, 85, 241–246.Google Scholar
Townsend, A.K., Clark, A.B., McGowan, K.J. & Lovette, I.J. 2009. Reproductive partitioning and the assumptions of reproductive skew models in the cooperatively breeding American crow. Animal Behaviour, 77, 503–512.Google Scholar
Travisano, M. & Velicer, G.J. 2004. Strategies of microbial cheater control. Trends in Microbiology, 12, 72–78.Google Scholar
Tregenza, T. 1995. Building on the ideal free distribution. Advances in Ecological Research, 26, 253–307.Google Scholar
Tregenza, T., Wedell, N. & Chapman, T. 2006. Introduction. Sexual conflict: a new paradigm? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 361, 229–234.Google Scholar
Tripet, F., Glaser, M. & Richner, H. 2002. Behavioural responses to ectoparasites: time-budget adjustments and what matters to blue tits Parus caeruleus infested by fleas. Ibis, 144, 461–469.Google Scholar
Trivers, R.L. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.Google Scholar
Trivers, R.L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, pp. 136–179. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Trivers, R.L. & Hare, H. 1976. Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science, 191, 249–263.Google Scholar
Troisi, C.A., Hoppitt, W.J., Ruiz-Miranda, C.R. & Laland, K.N. 2018. Food-offering calls in wild golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia): evidence for teaching behavior? International Journal of Primatology, 39, 1105–1123.Google Scholar
Tsubaki, Y. 2003. The genetic polymorphism linked to mate-securing strategies in the male damselfly Mnais costalis Selys (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Population Ecology, 45, 263–266.Google Scholar
Tsuji, K. & Tsuji, N. 2005. Why is dominance hierarchy age-related in social insects? The relative longevity hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 58, 517–526.Google Scholar
Tsvetkova, M. & Macy, M.W. 2014. The social contagion of generosity. PLoS One, 9, e87275.Google Scholar
Tsvetkova, M. & Macy, M.W. 2015. The social contagion of antisocial behavior. Sociological Science, 2, 36–49.Google Scholar
Tuljapurkar, S. 1990. Delayed reproduction and fitness in variable environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 87, 1139–1143.Google Scholar
Turillazzi, S. & West-Eberhard, M.J. 1996. Natural History and Evolution of Paper Wasps. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ueno, M., Yamada, K. & Nakamichi, M. 2015. Emotional states after grooming interactions in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 129, 394–401.Google Scholar
Ummenhofer, C.C. & Meehl, G.A. 2017. Extreme weather and climate events with ecological relevance: a review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372, 20160135.Google Scholar
Unger, L.M. & Sargent, R.C. 1988. Allopaternal care in the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas: females prefer males with eggs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 23, 27–32.Google Scholar
Utkovski, Z., Stojkoski, V., Basnarkov, L. & Kocarev, L. 2017. Promoting cooperation by preventing exploitation: the role of network structure. Physical Review E, 96, 022315.Google Scholar
Vahl, W.K. & Kingma, S.A. 2007. Food divisibility and interference competition among captive ruddy turnstones, Arenaria interpres. Animal Behaviour, 74, 1391–1401.Google Scholar
Vahl, W.K., Van Der Meer, J., Meijer, K., Piersma, T. & Weissing, F.J. 2007. Interference competition, the spatial distribution of food and free-living foragers. Animal Behaviour, 74, 1493–1503.Google Scholar
Vaidya, N., Walker, S.I. & Lehman, N. 2013. Recycling of informational units leads to selection of replicators in a prebiotic soup. Chemistry & Biology, 20, 241–252.Google Scholar
Vail, A.L., Manica, A. & Bshary, R. 2013. Referential gestures in fish collaborative hunting. Nature Communications, 4, 1765.Google Scholar
Vail, A.L., Manica, A. & Bshary, R. 2014. Fish choose appropriately when and with whom to collaborate. Current Biology, 24, R791–R793.Google Scholar
Valone, T.J. 1989. Group foraging, public information, and patch estimation. Oikos, 56, 357–363.Google Scholar
Valone, T.J. 2007. From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 1–14.Google Scholar
van Boheemen, L.A., Hammers, M., Kingma, S.A., et al. 2019. Compensatory and additive helper effects in the cooperatively breeding Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). Ecology and Evolution, 9, 2986–2995.Google Scholar
Van Cleve, J. & Akcay, E. 2014. Pathways to social evolution: reciprocity, relatedness, and synergy. Evolution, 68, 2245–2258.Google Scholar
van de Crommenacker, J., Komdeur, J., Burke, T. & Richardson, D.S. 2011a. Spatio-temporal variation in territory quality and oxidative status: a natural experiment in the Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). Journal of Animal Ecology, 80, 668–680.Google Scholar
van de Crommenacker, J., Komdeur, J. & Richardson, D.S. 2011b. Assessing the cost of helping: the roles of body condition and oxidative balance in the Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). PLoS One, 6, e26423.Google Scholar
van de Pol, M., Jenouvrier, S.p., Cornelissen, J.H. & Visser, M.E. 2017. Behavioural, ecological and evolutionary responses to extreme climatic events: challenges and directions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 372, 20160134.Google Scholar
van de Waal, E., Spinelli, M., Bshary, R., Ros, A.F.H. & Noe, R. 2013. Negotiations over grooming in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus). International Journal of Primatology, 34, 1153–1171.Google Scholar
van der Marel, A., Lopez-Darias, M. & Waterman, J.M. 2019. Group-enhanced predator detection and quality of vigilance in a social ground squirrel. Animal Behaviour, 151, 43–52.Google Scholar
van Doorn, G.S. & Taborsky, M. 2012. The evolution of generalized reciprocity on social interaction networks. Evolution, 66, 651–664.Google Scholar
van Doorn, G.S., Riebli, T. & Taborsky, M. 2014. Coaction versus reciprocity in continuous-time models of cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 356, 1–10.Google Scholar
van Honk, C. & Hogeweg, P. 1981. The ontogeny of the social structure in a captive Bombus terrestris colony. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 9, 111–119.Google Scholar
van Zweden, J.S., Fuerst, M.A., Heinze, J. & D’Ettorre, P. 2007. Specialization in policing behaviour among workers in the ant Pachycondyla inversae. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 1421–1428.Google Scholar
Van Zweden, J.S., Cardoen, D. & Wenseleers, T. 2012. Social evolution: when promiscuity breeds cooperation. Current Biology, 22, R922–R924.Google Scholar
Vanderveldt, A., Oliveira, L. & Green, L. 2016. Delay discounting: pigeon, rat, human – does it matter? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Learning and Cognition, 42, 141–162.Google Scholar
Vangestel, C., Callens, T., Vandomme, V. & Lens, L. 2013. Sex-biased dispersal at different geographical scales in a cooperative breeder from fragmented rainforest. PLoS One, 8, e71624.Google Scholar
Varley, G.C. & Gradwell, G.R. 1960. Key factors in population studies. Journal of Animal Ecology, 29, 399–401.Google Scholar
Välimäki, P., Kivelä, S.M. & Mäenpää, M.I. 2011. Mating with a kin decreases female remating interval: a possible example of inbreeding avoidance. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 2037.Google Scholar
Vehrencamp, S.L. 1977. Relative fecundity and parental effort in the communally nesting anis, Crotophaga sulcirostris. Science, 197, 403–405.Google Scholar
Vehrencamp, S.L. 1978. The adaptive significance of communal nesting in groove-billed anis (Crotophaga sulcirostris). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 4, 1–33.Google Scholar
Vehrencamp, S.L. 1983. A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies. Animal Behaviour, 31, 667–682.Google Scholar
Vehrencamp, S.L. & Quinn, J.S. 2004. Joint laying systems. In Koenig, W.D. & Dickinson, J.L. (eds), Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds, pp. 177–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Venkataraman, V.V., Kerby, J.T., Nguyen, N., Ashenafi, Z.T. & Fashing, P.J. 2015. Solitary Ethiopian wolves increase predation success on rodents when among grazing gelada monkey herds. Journal of Mammalogy, 96, 129–137.Google Scholar
Ventura, R., Majolo, B., Koyama, N.F., Hardie, S. & Schino, G. 2006. Reciprocation and interchange in wild Japanese macaques: grooming, cofeeding, and agonistic support. American Journal of Primatology: Official Journal of the American Society of Primatologists, 68, 1138–1149.Google Scholar
Verbeek, N.A. & Butler, R.W. 1981. Cooperative breeding of the northwestern crow Corvus caurinus in British Columbia. Ibis, 123, 183–189.Google Scholar
Vestergaard, K. & Magnhagen, C. 1993. Brood size and offspring age affect risk-taking and aggression in nest-guarding common gobies. Behaviour, 125, 233–243.Google Scholar
Viana, D.S., Gordo, I., Sucena, E. & Moita, M.A. 2010. Cognitive and motivational requirements for the emergence of cooperation in a rat social game. Plos One, 5, e8483.Google Scholar
Viblanc, V.A., Arnaud, C.M., Dobson, F.S. & Murie, J.O. 2009. Kin selection in Columbian ground squirrels (Urocitellus columbianus): littermate kin provide individual fitness benefits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 989–994.Google Scholar
Viblanc, V.A., Mathien, A., Saraux, C., Viera, V.M. & Groscolas, R. 2011. It costs to be clean and fit: energetics of comfort behavior in breeding-fasting penguins. PLoS One, 6, e21110.Google Scholar
Vick, L.G. & Pereira, M.E. 1989. Episodic targeting aggression and the histories of Lemur social groups. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 25, 3–12.Google Scholar
Vidya, T.N.C., Balmforth, Z., Roux, A.L. & Cherry, M.I. 2009. Genetic structure, relatedness and helping behaviour in the yellow mongoose in a farmland and a natural habitat. Journal of Zoology, 278, 57–64.Google Scholar
Villet, M. 1990. Qualitative relations of egg size, egg production and colony size in some ponerine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Natural History, 24, 1321–1331.Google Scholar
Vitikainen, E.I.K., Marshall, H.H., Thompson, F.J., et al. 2017. Biased escorts: offspring sex, not relatedness explains alloparental care patterns in a cooperative breeder. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 284, 20162384.Google Scholar
Vitikainen, E.I., Thompson, F.J., Marshall, H.H. & Cant, M.A. 2019. Live long and prosper: durable benefits of early-life care in banded mongooses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 374, 20180114.Google Scholar
Voelkl, B. 2015. The evolution of generalized reciprocity in social interaction networks. Theoretical Population Biology, 104, 17–25.Google Scholar
Voelkl, B., Portugal, S.J., Unsold, M., Usherwood, J.R., Wilson, A.M. & Fritz, J. 2015. Matching times of leading and following suggest cooperation through direct reciprocity during V-formation flight in ibis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 2115–2120.Google Scholar
Voigt, D.R. & Earle, B.D. 1983. Avoidance of coyotes by red fox families. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 47, 852–857.Google Scholar
von Bayern, A.M., de Kort, S.R., Clayton, N.S. & Emery, N.J. 2007. The role of food- and object-sharing in the development of social bonds in juvenile jackdaws (Corvus monedula). Behaviour, 144, 711–733.Google Scholar
Wade, M.J. 1976. Group selection among laboratory populations of Tribolium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 73, 4604–4607.Google Scholar
Waldeck, P., Andersson, M., Kilpi, M. & Öst, M. 2007. Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 67–73.Google Scholar
Waldman, B. 1988. The ecology of kin recognition. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 19, 543–571.Google Scholar
Wallace, J.C., Kolbeinshavn, A.G. & Reinsnes, T.G. 1988. The effects of stocking density on early growth in Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.). Aquaculture, 73, 101–110.Google Scholar
Walter, B., Brunner, E. & Heinze, J. 2011. Policing effectiveness depends on relatedness and group size. The American Naturalist, 177, 368–376.Google Scholar
Walters, J.R. 1990. Red-cockaded woodpeckers: a ‘primitive’ cooperative breeder. In Stacey, P.B. & Koenig, W.D. (eds), Cooperative Breeding in Birds, pp. 69–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walters, J.R., Copeyon, C.K. & Carter III, J.H. 1992. Test of the ecological basis of cooperative breeding in red-cockaded woodpeckers. The Auk, 109, 90–97.Google Scholar
Wang, C. & Lu, X.I.N. 2011. Female ground tits prefer relatives as extra-pair partners: driven by kin-selection? Molecular Ecology, 20, 2851–2863.Google Scholar
Ward, P. & Zahavi, A. 1973. The importance of certain assemblages of birds as ‘information centres’ for food-finding. Ibis, 115, 517–534.Google Scholar
Ward, P.I. 2000. Cryptic female choice in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L.). Evolution, 54, 1680–1686.Google Scholar
Ward, P.I. & Enders, M.M. 1985. Conflict and cooperation in the group feeding of the social spider Stegodyphus mimosarum. Behaviour, 94, 167–182.Google Scholar
Warner, R.R. & Hoffman, S.G. 1980. Population density and the economics of territorial defense in a coral reef fish. Ecology, 61, 772–780.Google Scholar
Waser, P.M. 1981. Sociality or territorial defense? The influence of resource renewal. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 8, 231–237.Google Scholar
Wasser, S.K. & Barash, D.P. 1983. Reproductive suppression among females – implications for biomedicine and sexual selection theory. Quarterly Review of Biology, 58, 513–538.Google Scholar
Watts, D.P. 1998. Coalitionary mate guarding by male chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 44, 43–55.Google Scholar
Watts, D.P. 2002. Reciprocity and interchange in the social relationships of wild male chimpanzees. Behaviour, 139, 343–370.Google Scholar
Weatherhead, P.J. 1983. Two principal strategies in avian communal roosts. The American Naturalist, 121, 237–243.Google Scholar
Weatherhead, P.J. 1987. Field tests of information transfer in communally roosting birds. Animal Behaviour, 35, 614–615.Google Scholar
Webster, M.S. 1994. Female-defence polygyny in a Neotropical bird, the Montezuma oropendola. Animal Behaviour, 48, 779–794.Google Scholar
Wedekind, C. & Braithwaite, V.A. 2002. The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity. Current Biology, 12, 1012–1015.Google Scholar
Wedekind, C. & Milinski, M. 2000. Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science, 288, 850–852.Google Scholar
Weeks, P. 1999. Interactions between red-billed oxpeckers, Buphagus erythrorhynchus, and domesticated cattle, Bos taurus, in Zimbabwe. Animal Behaviour, 58, 1253–1259.Google Scholar
Weisel, O. 2016. Social motives in intergroup conflict: group identity and perceived target of threat. European Economic Review, 90, 122–133.Google Scholar
Weladji, R.B., Gaillard, J.M., Yoccoz, N.G., et al. 2006. Good reindeer mothers live longer and become better in raising offspring. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1239–1244.Google Scholar
Wells, D.A., Cant, M.A., Nichols, H.J. & Hoffman, J.I. 2018. A high-quality pedigree and genetic markers both reveal inbreeding depression for quality but not survival in a cooperative mammal. Molecular Ecology, 27, 2271–2288.Google Scholar
Wenseleers, T. & Ratnieks, F.L.W. 2006a. Comparative analysis of worker reproduction and policing in eusocial Hymenoptera supports relatedness theory. American Naturalist, 168, E163–E179.Google Scholar
Wenseleers, T. & Ratnieks, F.L.W. 2006b. Enforced altruism in insect societies. Nature, 444, 50.Google Scholar
Wenseleers, T., Ratnieks, F.L.W. & Billen, J. 2003. Caste fate conflict in swarm-founding social Hymenoptera: an inclusive fitness analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 647–658.Google Scholar
Wenseleers, T., Hart, A.G. & Ratnieks, F.L.W. 2004a. When resistance is useless: policing and the evolution of reproductive acquiescence in insect societies. American Naturalist, 164, E154–E167.Google Scholar
Wenseleers, T., Helantera, H., Hart, A. & Ratnieks, F.L.W. 2004b. Worker reproduction and policing in insect societies: an ESS analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17, 1035–1047.Google Scholar
Werner, G.D.A., Strassmann, J.E., Ivens, A.B.F., et al. 2014. Evolution of microbial markets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 1237–1244.Google Scholar
Werner, N.Y., Balshine, S., Leach, B. & Lotem, A. 2003. Helping opportunities and space segregation in cooperatively breeding cichlids. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 749–756.Google Scholar
West, S.A. & Gardner, A. 2010. Altruism, spite, and greenbeards. Science, 327, 1341–1344.Google Scholar
West, S.A. & Gardner, A. 2013. Adaptation and inclusive fitness. Current Biology, 23, R577–R584.Google Scholar
West, S.A. & Ghoul, M. 2019. Conflict within cooperation. Current Biology, 29, R42–R426.Google Scholar
West, S.A., Murray, M.G., Machado, C.A., Griffin, A.S. & Herre, E.A. 2001. Testing Hamilton’s rule with competition between relatives. Nature, 409, 510.Google Scholar
West, S.A., Pen, I. & Griffin, A.S. 2002. Conflict and cooperation – cooperation and competition between relatives. Science, 296, 72–75.Google Scholar
West, S., Griffin, A. & Gardner, A. 2007a. Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 415–432.Google Scholar
West, S.A., Diggle, S.P., Buckling, A., Gardner, A. & Griffins, A.S. 2007b. The social lives of microbes. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 38, 53–77.Google Scholar
West, S.A., Griffin, A.S. & Gardner, A. 2007c. Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. Current Biology, 17, R661–R672.Google Scholar
West, S.A., Fisher, R.M., Gardner, A. & Kiers, E.T. 2015. Major evolutionary transitions in individuality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 10112–10119.Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, M.J. 1975. The evolution of social behavior by kin selection. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 50, 1–33.Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, M.J. 1978. Polygyny and the evolution of social behavior in wasps. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 51, 832–856.Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, M.J. 1979. Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 123, 222–234.Google Scholar
Westergaard, G.C. & Suomi, S.J. 1997. Transfer of tools and food between groups of tufted capuchins (Cebus apella). American Journal of Primatology, 43, 33–41.Google Scholar
Wheller, W.M. 1911. The ant-colony as an organism. Journal of Morphology, 22, 307–325.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, M.E.A. & Lubin, Y. 2005. The functions of societies and the evolution of group living: spider societies as a test case. Biological Reviews, 80, 347–361.Google Scholar
Whiten, A. & Byrne, R.W. 1988. Tactical deception in primates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 233–244.Google Scholar
Whittingham, L.A., Dunn, P.O. & Magrath, R.D. 1997. Relatedness, polyandry and extra-group paternity in the cooperatively-breeding white-browed scrubwren (Sericornis frontalis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 261–270.Google Scholar
Wickler, W. & Seibt, U. 1981. Monogamy in Crustacea and Man. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie – Journal of Comparative Ethology, 57, 215–234.Google Scholar
Wickler, W. & Seibt, U. 1983. Monogamy: an ambiguous concept. In Bateson, P.P.G. (ed.), Mate Choice, pp. 33–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiklund, C.G. 1979. Increased breeding success for merlins Falco columbarius nesting among colonies of fieldfares Turdus pilaris. Ibis, 121, 109–111.Google Scholar
Wiklund, C.G. 1982. Fieldfare (Turdus pilaris) breeding success in relation to colony size, nest position and association with merlins (Falco columbarius). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 11, 165–172.Google Scholar
Wilcox, R.S. & Ruckdeschel, T. 1982. Food threshold territoriality in a water strider (Gerris remigis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 11, 85–90.Google Scholar
Wild, G., Pizzari, T. & West, S.A. 2011. Sexual conflict in viscous populations: the effect of the timing of dispersal. Theoretical Population Biology, 80, 298–316.Google Scholar
Wiley, R.H. & Rabenold, K.N. 1984. The evolution of cooperative breeding by delayed reciprocity and queuing for favorable social positions. Evolution, 38, 609–621.Google Scholar
Wilkins, A.S. & Holliday, R. 2009. The evolution of meiosis from mitosis. Genetics, 181, 3–12.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G.S. 1984. Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat. Nature, 308, 181–184.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G.S. 1986. Social grooming in the common vampire bat, Desmodus rotundus. Animal Behaviour, 34, 1880–1889.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G.S. 1988. Reciprocal altruism in bats and other mammals. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 85–100.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G.S. 1992. Communal nursing in the evening bat, Nycticeius humeralis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 31, 225–235.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G.S., Carter, G.G., Bohn, K.M. & Adams, D.M. 2016. Non-kin cooperation in bats. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 371, 20150095.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G.S., Carter, G., Bohn, K.M., et al. 2019. Kinship, association, and social complexity in bats. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 73, 7.Google Scholar
Williams, D.A. & Rabenold, K.N. 2005. Male-biased dispersal, female philopatry, and routes to fitness in a social corvid. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 150–159.Google Scholar
Williams, G.C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, J.M., Lonsdorf, E.V., Wilson, M.L., et al. 2008. Causes of death in the Kasekela chimpanzees of Gombe National Park, Tanzania. American Journal of Primatology, 70, 766–777.Google Scholar
Williams, P., Winzer, K., Chan, W.C. & Camara, M. 2007. Look who’s talking: communication and quorum sensing in the bacterial world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 362, 1119–1134.Google Scholar
Wilson, A.J. & Nussey, D.H. 2010. What is individual quality? An evolutionary perspective. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 207–214.Google Scholar
Wilson, D.S. 1975. Theory of group selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 72, 143–146.Google Scholar
Wilson, D.S., Pollock, G.B. & Dugatkin, L.A. 1992. Can altruism evolve in purely viscous populations? Evolutionary Ecology, 6, 331–341.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. & Hölldobler, B. 2005. Eusociality: origin and consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 13367–13371.Google Scholar
Wilson, M.L., Boesch, C., Fruth, B., et al. 2014. Lethal aggression in Pan is better explained by adaptive strategies than human impacts. Nature, 513, 414–417.Google Scholar
Wiltermuth, S.S. & Heath, C. 2009. Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20, 1–5.Google Scholar
Winterhalder, B. 1996. A marginal model of tolerated theft. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 37–53.Google Scholar
Winterrowd, M.F. & Weigl, P.D. 2006. Mechanisms of cache retrieval in the group nesting southern flying squirrel (Glaucomys volans). Ethology, 112, 1136–1144.Google Scholar
Wirtz, P. 1999. Mother species–father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Animal Behaviour, 58, 1–12.Google Scholar
Wirtz‐Ocaňa, S., Schütz, D., Pachler, G., & Taborsky, M. 2013. Paternal inheritance of growth in fish pursuing alternative reproductive tactics. Ecology and Evolution, 3, 1614–1625.Google Scholar
Wirtz-Ocaňa, S., Meidl, P., Bonfils, D. & Taborsky, M. 2014. Y-linked Mendelian inheritance of giant and dwarf male morphs in shell-brooding cichlids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 281, 20140253.Google Scholar
Wisenden, B.D. 1999. Alloparental care in fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 9, 45–70.Google Scholar
Wisenden, B.D. & Keenleyside, M.H.A. 1992. Intraspecific brood adoption in convict cichlids: a mutual benefit. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 31, 263–269.Google Scholar
Wisenden, B.D. & Keenleyside, M.H.A. 1994. The dilution effect and differential predation following brood adoption in free-ranging convict cichlids (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum). Ethology, 96, 203–212.Google Scholar
Witsenburg, F., Schuerch, R., Otti, O. & Heg, D. 2010. Behavioural types and ecological effects in a natural population of the cooperative cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher. Animal Behaviour, 80, 757–767.Google Scholar
Witte, V., Schliessmann, D. & Hashim, R. 2010. Attack or call for help? Rapid individual decisions in a group-hunting ant. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 1040–1047.Google Scholar
Wittig, R.M., Crockford, C., Deschner, T., et al. 2014. Food sharing is linked to urinary oxytocin levels and bonding in related and unrelated wild chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 281, 20133096.Google Scholar
Wogel, H., Abrunhosa, P.A. & Pombal, J.P. Jr 2002. Atividade reprodutiva de Physalaemus signifer (Anura, Leptodactylidae) em ambiente temporário. Iheringia Série Zoologia, 92, 57–70.Google Scholar
Wolf, J.B.W. & Trillmich, F. 2008. Kin in space: social viscosity in a spatially and genetically substructured network. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2063–2069.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. & Weissing, F.J. 2012. Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 452–461.Google Scholar
Wolff, J.O. & Plissner, J.H. 1998. Sex biases in avian natal dispersal: an extension of the mammalian model. Oikos, 327–330.Google Scholar
Wong, M.Y.L. & Balshine, S. 2010. Fight for your breeding right: hierarchy re-establishment predicts aggression in a social queue. Biology Letters, 7, 190–193.Google Scholar
Wong, M. & Balshine, S. 2011. The evolution of cooperative breeding in the African cichlid fish, Neolamprologus pulcher. Biological Reviews, 86, 511–530.Google Scholar
Wong, M.Y.L., Buston, P.M., Munday, P.L. & Jones, G.P. 2007. The threat of punishment enforces peaceful cooperation and stable queues in a coral-reef fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 1093–1099.Google Scholar
Wong, M.Y.L., Munday, P.L., Buston, P.M. & Jones, G.R. 2008. Fasting or feasting in a fish social hierarchy. Current Biology, 18, R372–R373.Google Scholar
Wood, R.I., Kim, J.Y. & Li, G.R. 2016. Cooperation in rats playing the iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Animal Behaviour, 114, 27–35.Google Scholar
Woolfenden, G.E. & Fitzpatrick, J.W. 1978. The inheritance of territory in group-breeding birds. Bioscience, 28, 104–108.Google Scholar
Woolfenden, G.E. & Fitzpatrick, J.W. 1984. The Florida Scrub Jay: Demography of a Cooperative-Breeding Bird (20th ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wootton, R.J. 1985. Effects of food and density on the reproductive biology of the threespine stickleback with a hypothesis on population limitation in sticklebacks. Behaviour, 93, 101–111.Google Scholar
Woxvold, I.A., Adcock, G.J. & Mulder, R.A. 2006. Fine-scale genetic structure and dispersal in cooperatively breeding apostlebirds. Molecular Ecology, 15, 3139–3146.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R.W. 1999. Evolution of coalitionary killing. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 110, 1–30.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R.W. 2018. Two types of aggression in human evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 245–253.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R.W. & Glowacki, L. 2012. Intergroup aggression in chimpanzees and war in nomadic hunter-gatherers. Human Nature, 23, 5–29.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1999. Altruism as a signal: Zahavi’s alternative to kin selection and reciprocity. Journal of Avian Biology, 108–115.Google Scholar
Wright, J. & Cuthill, I. 1989. Manipulation of sex differences in parental care. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 25, 171–181.Google Scholar
Wright, J., McDonald, P.G., Te Marvelde, L., Kazem, A.J. & Bishop, C.M. 2009. Helping effort increases with relatedness in bell miners, but ‘unrelated’ helpers of both sexes still provide substantial care. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 437–445.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1922. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. The American Naturalist, 56, 330–338.Google Scholar
Wrighten, S.A. & Hall, C.R. 2016. Support for altruistic behavior in rats. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 93–102.Google Scholar
Wyatt, G.A.K., West, S.A. & Gardner, A. 2013. Can natural selection favour altruism between species? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26, 1854–1865.Google Scholar
Wynne-Edwards, V.C. 1962. Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Xia, D., Li, J., Garber, P.A., et al. 2012. Grooming reciprocity in female tibetan macaques Macaca thibetana. American Journal of Primatology, 74, 569–579.Google Scholar
Yaber, M.a.C. & Rabenold, K.N. 2002. Effects of sociality on short-distance, female-biased dispersal in tropical wrens. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71, 1042–1055.Google Scholar
Yamamura, N., Higashi, M., Behera, N. & Yuichiro Wakano, J. 2004. Evolution of mutualism through spatial effects. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 226, 421–428.Google Scholar
Yamane, S. 1986. The colony cycle of the Sumatran paper wasp Ropalidia (Icariola) variegata jacobsoni (Buysson), with reference to the possible occurrence of serial polygyny (Hymenoptera Vespidae). Monitore Zoologico Italiano – Italian Journal of Zoology, 20, 135–161.Google Scholar
Yanagisawa, Y. 1983. Reproduction and parental care of the scale-eating fish Perissodus microlepis in Lake Tanganyika. Physiology and Ecology of Japan, 20, 23–31.Google Scholar
Yanagisawa, Y. 1985. Parental strategy of the cichlid fish Perissodus microlepis, with particular reference to intraspecific brood ‘farming out’. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 12, 241–249.Google Scholar
Yanagisawa, Y. 1986. Parental care in a monogamous mouthbrooding cichlid Xenotilapia flavipinnis in Lake Tanganyika. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology, 33, 249–261.Google Scholar
Yanagisawa, Y., Ochi, H. & Rossiter, A. 1996. Intra-buccal feeding of young in an undescribed Tanganyikan cichlid Microdontochromis sp. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 47, 191–201.Google Scholar
Yee, J.R., Cavigelli, S.A., Delgado, B. & McClintock, M.K. 2008. Reciprocal affiliation among adolescent rats during a mild group stressor predicts mammary tumors and lifespan. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70, 1050–1059.Google Scholar
Yom-Tov, Y. 1980. Intraspecific nest parasitism in birds. Biological Reviews, 55, 93–108.Google Scholar
Yom-Tov, Y. 2001. An updated list and some comments on the occurrence of intraspecific nest parasitism in birds. Ibis, 143, 133–143.Google Scholar
Young, A.J. & Clutton-Brock, T. 2006. Infanticide by subordinates influences reproductive sharing in cooperatively breeding meerkats. Biology Letters, 2, 385–387.Google Scholar
Young, A.J., Carlson, A.A., Monfort, S.L., et al. 2006. Stress and the suppression of subordinate reproduction in cooperatively breeding meerkats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 12005–12010.Google Scholar
Young, A.J., Oosthuizen, M.K., Lutermann, H. & Bennett, N.C. 2010. Physiological suppression eases in Damaraland mole-rat societies when ecological constraints on dispersal are relaxed. Hormones and Behavior, 57, 177–183.Google Scholar
Young, K.A., Genner, M.J., Joyce, D.A. & Haesler, M.P. 2009. Hotshots, hot spots, and female preference: exploring lek formation models with a bower-building cichlid fish. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 609–615.Google Scholar
Zack, S. 1990. Coupling delayed breeding with short-distance dispersal in cooperatively breeding birds. Ethology, 86, 265–286.Google Scholar
Zahavi, A. 1990. Arabian babblers: the quest for social status in a cooperative breeder. In Stacey, P.B. & Koenig, W.D. (eds), Cooperative Breeding in Birds, pp. 103–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zamudio, K.R. & Chan, L.M. 2008. Alternative reproductive tactics in amphibians. In Oliveira, R.F., Taborsky, M. & Brockmann, H.J. (eds), Alternative Reproductive Tactics. An Integrative Approach, pp. 300–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zanette, L.R. & Field, J. 2008. Genetic relatedness in early associations of Polistes dominulus: from related to unrelated helpers. Molecular Ecology, 17, 2590–2597.Google Scholar
Zanette, L.R. & Field, J. 2011. Founders versus joiners: group formation in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus. Animal Behaviour, 82, 699–705.Google Scholar
Zanette, L.R., Miller, S.D., Faria, C., et al. 2012. Reproductive conflict in bumblebees and the evolution of worker policing. Evolution, 66, 3765–3777.Google Scholar
Zeyl, E., Aars, J., Ehrich, D. & Wiig, O. 2009. Families in space: relatedness in the Barents Sea population of polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Molecular Ecology, 18, 735–749.Google Scholar
Zickler, D. & Kleckner, N. 2016 A few of our favorite things: pairing, the bouquet, crossover interference and evolution of meiosis. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 54, 135–148.Google Scholar
Zink, A.G. 2000. The evolution of intraspecific brood parasitism in birds and insects. American Naturalist, 155, 395–405.Google Scholar
Zöttl, M., Heg, D., Chervet, N. & Taborsky, M. 2013a. Kinship reduces alloparental care in cooperative cichlids where helpers pay-to-stay. Nature Communications, 4, 1341.Google Scholar
Zöttl, M., Frommen, J.G. & Taborsky, M. 2013b. Group size adjustment to ecological demand in a cooperative breeder. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 280, 20122772.Google Scholar
Zöttl, M., Fischer, S. & Taborsky, M. 2013c. Partial brood care compensation by female breeders in response to experimental manipulation of alloparental care. Animal Behaviour, 85, 1471–1478.Google Scholar
Zöttl, M., Chapuis, L., Freiburghaus, M. & Taborsky, M. 2013d. Strategic reduction of help before dispersal in a cooperative breeder. Biology Letters, 9, 20120878.Google Scholar
Zupan, M., Štuhec, I., & Jordan, D. 2020. The effect of an irregular feeding schedule on equine behavior. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 23, 156–163.Google Scholar