Book contents
- The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon
- Series page
- The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Using the Lexicon
- Chronology of Martin Heidegger
- Abbreviations for Heidegger’s Works
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- K
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- T
- U
- V
- W
- German–English Glossary
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 April 2021
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon
- Series page
- The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Using the Lexicon
- Chronology of Martin Heidegger
- Abbreviations for Heidegger’s Works
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- K
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- T
- U
- V
- W
- German–English Glossary
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon , pp. 838 - 855Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Adorno, Theodor W. 1992. “Parataxis: On Hölderlin’s Late Poetry.” In his Gesammelte Schriften, vol. ii: Notes to Literature (New York: Columbia University Press), 109–49.Google Scholar
Adrián Escudero, Jesús. 2009. El lenguaje de Heidegger: Diccionario filosófico 1912–1927 (Barcelona: Herder).Google Scholar
Adrián Escudero, Jesús 2013. “Heidegger on Discourse and Idle Talk: The Role of Aristotelian Rhetoric,” Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual 3: 1–17.Google Scholar
Adrián Escudero, Jesús 2015. Heidegger and the Emergence of the Question of Being, trans. Juan Pablo Hernández Betancur (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Apel, Karl-Otto. 1963. Die Idee der Sprache in der Tradition des Humanismus von Dante bis Vico, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 8 (Bonn: Bouvier).Google Scholar
Arisaka, Yoko. 1995. “On Heidegger’s Theory of Space: A Critique of Dreyfus,” Inquiry 38: 455–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arjakovsky, Philippe, Fédier, François, and France-Lanord, Hadrien (eds.). 2013. Le dictionnaire Martin Heidegger (Paris: Éditions du Cerf).Google Scholar
Arrien, Sophie-Jan. 2014. L’inquiétude de la pensée: L’herméneutique de la vie du jeune Heidegger (1919–1923) (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asana Kalinga Maidika, Jules. 2013. Métaphysique et technique moderne chez Martin Heidegger (Paris: L’Harmattan).Google Scholar
Aurenque, Diana. 2011. Ethosdenken: Auf der Spur einer ethischen Fragestellung in der Philosophie Martin Heideggers (Freiburg: Karl Alber).Google Scholar
Backman, Jussi. 2006. “Divine and Mortal Motivation: On the Movement of Life in Aristotle and Heidegger,” Continental Philosophy Review 38/3: 241–61.Google Scholar
Backman, Jussi. 2015. Complicated Presence: Heidegger and the Postmetaphysical Unity of Being (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Bambach, Charles. 1995. Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis of Historicism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambach, Charles. 2003. Heidegger’s Roots: Nietzsche, National Socialism and the Greeks (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Bambach, Charles. 2013. Thinking the Poetic Measure of Justice: Hölderlin-Heidegger-Celan (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1975. The Pleasure of the Text, trans. Richard Miller (New York: Hill & Wang).Google Scholar
Bauer, Nancy. 2001. “Being-With as Being-Against: Heidegger Meets Hegel in The Second Sex,” Continental Philosophy Review 34: 129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de 1953. The Second Sex, trans. H.M. Parshley (New York: Alfred A. Knopf).Google Scholar
Bell, Jeffrey A., Cutrofello, Andrew, and Livingston, Paul M. (eds.). 2015. Beyond the Analytic-Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert. 1985. The Question of Language in Heidegger’s History of Being (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press).Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert. 1987. “Descartes in the History of Being,” Research in Phenomenology 17: 75–102.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert. 1990. “Heidegger’s Destruction of Phronesis,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (S1): 127–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert. 1994. “Repetition and Tradition: Heidegger’s Destructuring of the Distinction Between Essence and Existence in Basic Problems of Phenomenology,” in Kisiel, Theodore and van Buren, Jan (eds.), Reading Heidegger From the Start: Essays in his Earliest Thought (Albany: State University of New York Press), 123–36.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert. 2012. “Heidegger, Rickert, Nietzsche and the Critique of Biologism,” in Babich, Babette, Denker, Alfred, and Zaborowski, Holger (eds.), Heidegger & Nietzsche (Amsterdam: Rodopi), 158–80.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert. 2013a. “Heidegger, Nietzsche, National Socialism,” in Raffoul, François and Nelson, Eric S. (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger (New York: Bloomsbury), 47–54.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert. 2013b. “Who Belongs? Heidegger’s Philosophy of the Volk in 1933–34,” in Fried, Gregory and Polt, Richard (eds.), Martin Heidegger: Nature, History, State (London: Bloomsbury), 109–25.Google Scholar
Bernet, Rudolf. 1994a. “Phenomenological Reduction and the Double Life of the Subject,” in Kisiel, Theodore and van Buren, Jan (eds.), Reading Heidegger from the Start: Essays in his Earliest Thought (Albany: State University of New York Press), 245–67.Google Scholar
Bernet, Rudolf. 1994b. La vie du sujet: Recherches sur l’interprétation de Husserl dans la phénoménologie (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. 1991a. The New Constellation: The Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. 1991b. “Heidegger’s Silence? Ēthos and Technology,” in Bernstein 1991a, 79–141.Google Scholar
Blattner, William. 1994. “The Concept of Death in Being and Time,” Man and World 27: 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattner, William. 1996. “Existence and Self-Understanding in Being and Time,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56: 97–110.Google Scholar
Blattner, William. 2006. Heidegger’s Being and Time: A Reader’s Guide. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Blattner, William. 2007. “Ontology, the A Priori, and the Primacy of Practice,” in Crowell and Malpas 2007, 10–27.Google Scholar
Blattner, William. 2015. “Essential Guilt and Transcendental Conscience,” in McManus 2015c, 116–34.Google Scholar
Borgmann, Albert. 1984. Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 2002a. “Dasein, the Being that Thematizes,” in his Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 324–47.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 2002b. “Heidegger’s Categories in Sein und Zeit,” in his Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 298–323.Google Scholar
Braver, Lee. 2007. A Thing of this World: A History of Continental Anti-Realism (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Braver, Lee. 2012. Groundless Grounds: A Study of Wittgenstein and Heidegger (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Braver, Lee. (ed.). 2015. Division III of Heidegger’s Being and Time: The Unanswered Question of Being (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz. 1973. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, trans. Antos C. Rancurello, D.B. Terrell, and Linda McAlister (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1st German ed. 1874).Google Scholar
Brewer, Bill. 2006. “Perception and Content,” European Journal of Philosophy 14: 165–81.Google Scholar
Brogan, Walter. 2005. Heidegger and Aristotle: The Twofoldness of Being (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Bucher, Theodor. 2006–07. “Zu Heideggers Verständnis der formalen Logik,” Heidegger Studies 22: 111–45 and 23: 113–46.Google Scholar
Burch, Matthew I. 2013. “The Existential Sources of Phenomenology: Heidegger on Formal Indication,” European Journal of Philosophy 21: 258–78.Google Scholar
Campbell, Scott M. 2012. Early Heidegger’s Philosophy of Life: Facticity, Being, and Language (New York: Fordham University Press).Google Scholar
Caputo, John D. 1992. “Spirit and Danger,” in Dallery, Arleen B. et al. (eds.), Ethics and Danger: Essays on Heidegger and Continental Thought (Albany: State University of New York Press), 43–59.Google Scholar
Caputo, John D. 1993. Demythologizing Heidegger (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Caputo, John D. and Scanlon, Michael J. (eds.). 1999. God, the Gift, and Postmodernism (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Carlisle, Clare. 2011. “Repetition and Recurrence: Putting Metaphysics in Motion,” in Stone, Alison (ed.), The Edinburgh Critical History of Philosophy (Edinburgh University Press), 294–313.Google Scholar
Carlisle, Clare. 2013. “Kierkegaard and Heidegger,” in Lippitt, J. and Pattison, G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Kierkegaard (Oxford University Press), 421–39.Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor. 1991. “The Conspicuousness of Signs in Being and Time,” Journal of the British Society of Phenomenology 22: 158–69.Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor. 1994. “On Being Social: A Reply to Olafson,” Inquiry 37: 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carman, Taylor. 2003. Heidegger’s Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor. 2015. “Heidegger on Unconcealment and Correctness,” in Gardner, S. and Grist, M (eds.), The Transcendental Turn (Oxford University Press), 264–77.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1931. “Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache,” Erkenntnis 2: 219–41.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1959. “The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language,” in Ayer, A. J. (ed.), Logical Positivism (New York: Free Press; 1st German ed. 1931), 60–81.Google Scholar
Carr, David. 2007. “Heidegger on Kant on Transcendence,” in Crowell and Malpas 2007, 28–42.Google Scholar
Carter, James. 2014. “Heidegger’s Sein zum Tode as Radicalization of Aristotle’s Definition of Kinesis,” Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 18: 473–502.Google Scholar
Casey, Edward S. 1997. The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1965. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, vol. ii: Mythical Thought, trans. Ralph Manheim (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. 1989. This New Yet Unapproachable America (Albuquerque, NM: Living Batch Press).Google Scholar
Cerbone, David R. 1999. “Composition and Constitution: Heidegger’s Hammer,” Philosophical Topics 27: 309–29.Google Scholar
Ciocan, Cristian. 2011. “Comprendre et sens: La genèse ontologique du langage dans l’analytique du Dasein,” Revue philosophique de Louvain 109: 527–51.Google Scholar
Cioflec, Eveline. 2012. Der Begriff des ‘Zwischen’ bei Martin Heidegger (Freiburg: Karl Alber).Google Scholar
Clark, Maudemarie. 1998. “Nietzsche,” in Craig, Edward (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. vi (New York: Routledge), 844–61.Google Scholar
Comay, Rebecca and McCumber, John (eds.). 2009. Endings: Questions of Memory in Hegel and Heidegger (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Conway, Daniel. 1992. “Heidegger, Nietzsche, and the Origins of Nihilism,” Journal of Nietzsche Studies 3: 11–43.Google Scholar
Crowe, Benjamin D. 2001. “Resoluteness in the Middle Voice,” Philosophy Today 45: 225–41.Google Scholar
Crowe, Benjamin D. 2006. Heidegger’s Religious Origins: Destruction and Authenticity (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Crowell, Steven. 2001a. Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, Steven. 2001b. “Subjectivity: Locating the First-Person in Being and Time,” Inquiry 44: 433–54.Google Scholar
Crowell, Steven. 2007. “Sorge or Selbstbewußtsein? Heidegger and Korsgaard on the Sources of Normativity,” European Journal of Philosophy 15: 315–33.Google Scholar
Crowell, Steven. 2013. Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Crowell, Steven and Malpas, Jeff (eds.). 2007. Transcendental Heidegger (Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 1991. “Heidegger’s Kantian Turn: Notes to his Commentary on the Kritik der Reinen Vernunft,” Review of Metaphysics 45/2: 329–61.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 1994. “Heidegger’s Method: Philosophical Concepts as Formal Indications,” Review of Metaphysics 47: 775–97.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 1995. “Heidegger’s Concept of Temporality: Reflections on a Recent Criticism,” Review of Metaphysics 49: 95–115.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 2000. “Heidegger’s Deliberations,” Research in Phenomenology 1: 254–59.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 2001. Heidegger’s Concept of Truth. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 2007. “Transcendental Truth and the Truth that Prevails,” in Crowell and Malpas 2007, 63–73.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 2010. “The Critique of Pure Reason and Continental Philosophy: Heidegger’s Interpretation of Transcendental Imagination,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (Cambridge University Press), 380–400.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 2013a. “The Opening of the Future,” South African Journal of Philosophy 32: 373–82.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 2017. “Rethinking Difference,” in Zaborowski, Holger (ed.), Heidegger’s Question of Being: Dasein, Truth, and History (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press), 8–25.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred. 1986. “Heidegger, Hölderlin, and Politics,” Heidegger Studies 2: 81–95.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred. 2001. “Heidegger on Macht and Machenschaft,” Continental Philosophy Review 34/3: 247–67.Google Scholar
Dastur, Françoise. 1987. “Logic and Ontology: Heidegger’s ‘Destruction’ of Logic,” Research in Phenomenology 17/1: 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dastur, Françoise. 1990. Heidegger et la question du temps (Paris: Presses universitaires de France).Google Scholar
Dastur, Françoise. 1999. Heidegger and the Question of Time, trans. Raffoul, François and Pettigrew, David (Amherst, NY: Humanity Books).Google Scholar
Davis, Bret W. 2007. Heidegger and the Will: On the Way to Gelassenheit (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Davis, Bret W. 2014a. “Heidegger on Christianity and Divinity: A Chronological Compendium,” in Davis 2014b, 231–59.Google Scholar
De Beistegui, Miguel. 2000. “Boredom: Between Existence and History: On Heidegger’s Pivotal The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 31/2: 145–58.Google Scholar
Declève, Henri. 1970. Heidegger et Kant, Phaenomenologica 40 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
Denker, Alfred. 2000. Historical Dictionary of Heidegger’s Philosophy (London: Scarecow Press).Google Scholar
Denker, Alfred. 2013. “Being and Time: A Carefully Planned Accident?” in Wrathall 2013a, 157–76.Google Scholar
Denker, Alfred and Zaborowski, Holger (eds.). 2006. Heidegger und die Logik (Amsterdam: Rodopi).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1978a. “Violence and Metaphysics: An Essay on the Thought of Emmanuel Levinas,” in his Writing and Difference, trans. Bass, Alan (University of Chicago Press, 1978; 1st French ed. 1967), 97–192.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1978b. Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1985. “Letter to a Japanese Friend,” in Wood, David and Bernasconi, Robert (eds.), Derrida and Difference (Warwick: Parousia Press), 1–5.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1989. Of Spirit, trans. Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1992a. “How to Avoid Speaking: Denials,” in Coward, Harold and Foshay, Toby (eds.), Derrida and Negative Theology (Albany: State University of New York Press), 73–142.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1992b. “Postscriptum: Aporias, Ways and Voices,” in Coward, Harold and Foshay, Toby (eds.), Derrida and Negative Theology (Albany: State University of New York Press), 283–323.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1993. “Heidegger’s Ear: Philopolemology (Geschlecht 4),” in Sallis, John (ed.), Reading Heidegger: Commemorations (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), 163–218.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1997. Of Grammatology, corrected ed., trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2001. “Geschlecht: Sexual Difference, Ontological Difference,” in Holland, Nancy J. and Huntington, Patricia (eds.), Feminist Interpretations of Martin Heidegger (Pennsylvania State University Press), 53–72.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2008. The Animal that Therefore I Am. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2011. The Beast and the Sovereign, vol. ii, trans. Geoffrey Bennington (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Dewalque, Arnaud. 2005. “La critique de la théorie des valeurs dans ‘L’origine de l’œuvre d’art’: Contributions à une confrontation entre Rickert et Heidegger,” Revue Philosophique de Louvain 103/3: 390–414.Google Scholar
De Warren, Nicolas and Staiti, Andrea (eds.). 2015. New Approaches to Neo-Kantianism (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1906. Das Erlebnis und die Dichtung: Lessing, Goethe, Novalis (Leipzig: B.G. Teubner).Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1991. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time Division I (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1992. What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1997. “Heidegger on Gaining a Free Relation to Technology,” in Shrader-Frechette, Kristin and Westra, Laura (eds.), Technology and Values (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield), 41–54.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2000. “Could Anything be More Intelligible than Everyday Intelligibility? Reinterpreting Division I of Being and Time in the light of Division II,” in Faulconer, James E. and Wrathall, Mark A. (eds.), Appropriating Heidegger (Cambridge University Press), 155–74.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2005a. “Foreword” to White, Carol J., Time and Death: Heidegger’s Analysis of Finitude, ed. Ralkowski, Mark (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2005b. “Heidegger’s Ontology of Art,” in Dreyfus and Wrathall 2005, 407–19.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2006. “Heidegger on the Connection Between Nihilism, Art, Technology, and Politics,” in Guignon 2006b, 345–72.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2014. “Heidegger’s Critique of the Husserl/Searle Account of Intentionality,” in Wrathall, Mark A. (ed.), Skillful Coping (Oxford University Press), 76–91.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2017a. Background Practices: Essays on the Understanding of Being (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2017b. “Heidegger’s Ontology of Art,” in his Background Practices (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Spinosa, Charles. 1997. “Highway Bridges and Feasts: Heidegger and Borgmann on how to Affirm Technology,” Man and World 30: 159–77.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Taylor, Charles. 2015. Retrieving Realism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Wrathall, Mark A. (eds.). 2005. A Companion to Heidegger (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Düttmann, Alexander García. 2002. The Memory of Thought: An Essay on Heidegger and Adorno, trans. Nicholas Walker (London: Continuum).Google Scholar
Edwards, James C. 1997. The Plain Sense of Things: The Fate of Religion in an Age of Normal Nihilism (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press).Google Scholar
Eichinger, Ludwig M., Meliss, Meike, and Vázquez, María José Domínguez (eds.). 1982. Tendenzen verbaler Wortbildung in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache (Hamburg: Buske).Google Scholar
Elden, Stuart. 2002. Mapping the Present: Heidegger, Foucault and the Project of a Spatial History (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Elden, Stuart. 2006. Speaking Against Number: Heidegger, Language and the Politics of Calculation (Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
Elliott, Brian. 2005. Phenomenology and Imagination in Husserl and Heidegger (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Elpidorou, Andreas and Freeman, Lauren. 2015. “Affectivity in Heidegger I: Moods and Emotions in Being and Time,” Philosophy Compass 10: 661–71.Google Scholar
Emad, Parvis. 1981a. Heidegger and the Phenomenology of Value (Glen Ellyn, IL: Torey Press).Google Scholar
Emad, Parvis. 1981b. “Heidegger on Transcendence and Intentionality: His Critique of Scheler,” in Sheehan, Thomas (ed.), Heidegger: The Man and the Thinker (Chicago, IL: Precedent), 145–58.Google Scholar
Eriksen, Niels Nymann. 2000. Kierkegaard’s Category of Repetition: A Reconstruction (Berlin: de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Espinet, David. 2016. Phänomenologie des Hörens: Eine Untersuchung im Ausgang von Martin Heidegger, 2nd ed. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).Google Scholar
Fabris, A. 1997. “L’ermeneutica della fatticità nei corsi friburghesi dal 1919 al 1923,” in Volpi, F. (ed.), Heidegger (Rome: Laterza), 57–106.Google Scholar
Farin, Ingo. 2015. “Heidegger: Transformation of Hermeneutics,” in Malpas, Jeff and Gander, Hans-Helmuth (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Hermeneutics (New York: Routledge), 107–26.Google Scholar
Farin, Ingo and Malpas, Jeff. 2016. Reading Heidegger’s Black Notebooks 1931–1941 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Feick, Hildegaard and Ziegler, Susanne. 1991. Index zu Heidegger’s Sein und Zeit, 4th rev. ed. (Tübingen: Niemeyer; 1st ed. 1961).Google Scholar
Fell, Joseph P. 1979. Heidegger and Sartre: An Essay on Being and Place (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Fell, Joseph P. 1992. “The Familiar and the Strange: On the Limits of Praxis in Early Heidegger,” in Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Hall, Harrison (eds.), Heidegger: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell), 65–80.Google Scholar
Figal, Günter. 2006. “Heidegger’s Philosophy of Language in an Aristotelian Context: dunamis meta logou,” in Hyland, Drew A. and Manoussakis, John Panteleimon (eds.), Heidegger and the Greeks: Interpretive Essays (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), 83–92.Google Scholar
Figal, Günter. 2010a. Objectivity: The Hermeneutical and Philosophy, trans. George, Theodore D. (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Figal, Günter. 2010b. “Phenomenology: Heidegger after Husserl and the Greeks,” in Davis 2014b, 33–43.Google Scholar
Figal, Günter and Gander, Hans-Helmuth. 2005. Dimensionen des Hermeneutischen (Frankfurt: Klostermann).Google Scholar
Fleischer, Margot. 1991. Die Zeitanalysen in Heideggers Sein und Zeit (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan (New York: Vintage; 1st French ed. 1975).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2005. Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France 1981–1982, trans. Graham Burchell (New York: Picador).Google Scholar
Freeman, Lauren. 2015. “Phenomenology of Racial Oppression,” Knowledge Cultures 3: 24–44.Google Scholar
Freeman, Lauren and Elpidorou, Andreas. 2015. “Affectivity in Heidegger II: Temporality, Boredom and Beyond,” Philosophy Compass 10: 672–84.Google Scholar
Freeman, Lauren and Elpidorou, Andreas 2019. “Is Profound Boredom Boredom?” in Hadjioannou, Christos (ed.), Heidegger on Affect (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, in press).Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 2001. “The Uncanny,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. xvii, ed. and trans. Strachey, James (London: Vintage).Google Scholar
Fried, Gregory. 2000. Heidegger’s Polemos: From Being to Politics (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. 1958. Plato: An Introduction, trans. Meyerhoff, H. (New York: Harper, Bollingen).Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2000. A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger (Chicago, IL: Open Court).Google Scholar
Frings, Manfred. 1988. “Parmenides: Heidegger’s 1942–1943 Lecture,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 19/1: 15–33.Google Scholar
Fryer, David Ross. 1996. “Of Spirit: Heidegger and Derrida on Metaphysics, Ethics, and National Socialism,” Inquiry 36/1: 21–44.Google Scholar
Fultner, Barbara. 2013. “Heidegger’s Pragmatic-Existential Theory of Language and Assertion,” in Wrathall, Mark A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time (Cambridge University Press), 201–22.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1972. “Heidegger und die Sprache der Metaphysik,” in his Kleinere Schriften, vol. iii (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr), 212–30.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1990. Gesammelte Werke, vol. i: Wahrheit und Methode (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2000. “Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity; Subject and Person,” Continental Philosophy Review 33/3: 275–87.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2004. Truth and Method, trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall, 2nd rev. ed. (London: Continuum).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2014. Hermeneutics Between History and Philosophy: The Selected Writings of Hans-Georg Gadamer, vol. i, ed. and trans. Pol Vandevelde and Arun Iyer (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Gaifman, Milette. 2018. The Art of Libation in Classical Athens (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Gander, Hans-Helmuth and Striet, Magnus (eds.). 2017. Heideggers Weg in die Moderne: Eine Verortung der Schwarzen Hefte (Frankfurt: Klostermann).Google Scholar
Gethmann, Carl Friedrich. 1988. “Heideggers Konzeption des Handelns in Sein und Zeit,” in Gethmann-Siefert, Annemarie and Poeggeler, Otto (eds.), Heidegger und die praktische Philosophie (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp), 140–76.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).Google Scholar
Glazebrook, Trish. 2000. Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science (New York: Fordham University Press).Google Scholar
Glazebrook, Trish. 2001. “Heidegger and Scientific Realism,” Continental Philosophy Review 34/4: 361–401.Google Scholar
Glazebrook, Trish. (ed.). 2012. Heidegger on Science (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Golob, Sacha. 2013. “Heidegger on Kant, Time, and the ‘Form’ of Intentionality,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21/2: 345–67.Google Scholar
Golob, Sacha. 2014. Heidegger on Concepts, Freedom and Normativity (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Gooch, Todd A. 2000. The Numinous and Modernity: An Interpretation of Rudolf Otto’s Philosophy of Religion (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter Eli. 2005. “Myth and Modernity: Cassirer’s Critique of Heidegger,” New German Critique 94: 127–68.Google Scholar
Gothlin, Eva. 2003. “Reading Simone de Beauvoir with Martin Heidegger,” in Card, Claudia (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir (Cambridge University Press), 45–65.Google Scholar
Grant, Mary Amelia. 1960. The Myths of Hyginus (Lawrence: University of Kansas Publications).Google Scholar
Grimm, J. and Grimm, W.. 1854. Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm, vol. i (Leipzig: S. Hirzel).Google Scholar
Grimm, J. and Grimm, W. 1862. Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm, vol. iii (Leipzig: S. Hirzel).Google Scholar
Grimm, J. and Grimm, W. 1878. Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm, vol. iv (Leipzig: S. Hirzel).Google Scholar
Guignon, Charles. 1983. Heidegger and the Problem of Knowledge (Indianapolis: Hackett).Google Scholar
Guignon, Charles. 2005. “The History of Being,” in Dreyfus and Wrathall 2005, 392–405.Google Scholar
Guignon, Charles. 2006a. “Authenticity, Moral Values, and Psychotherapy,” in Guignon 2006b, 215–39.Google Scholar
Guignon, Charles. (ed.). 2006b. The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Gurwitsch, Aron. 1979. Human Encounters in the Social World, ed. Métraux, Alexandre, trans. Fred Kersten (Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press).Google Scholar
Guzzoni, Ute. 2009. Der andere Heidegger: Überlegungen zu seinem späteren Denken (Munich: Alber).Google Scholar
Haar, Michel. 1983. “The End of Distress: The End of Technology?” Research in Phenomenology 13/1: 43–63.Google Scholar
Haar, Michel. 1993. Heidegger and the Essence of Man, trans. William McNeil (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Han-Pile, Béatrice. 2013. “Freedom and the ‘Choice to Choose Oneself,’” in Wrathall 2013a, 291–319.Google Scholar
Harries, Karsten. 1997. The Ethical Function of Architecture (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Harries, Karsten. 2009. Art Matters: A Critical Commentary on Heidegger’s ‘The Origin of the Work of Art’. Contributions to Phenomenology 57 (New York: Springer).Google Scholar
Hatab, Lawrence J. and Brenner, William. 1983. “Heidegger and Wittgenstein on Language and Mystery,” International Studies in Philosophy 15/3: 25–43.Google Scholar
Haugeland, John. 1979. “Understanding Natural Language,” Journal of Philosophy 76: 619–32.Google Scholar
Haugeland, John. 2000. “Truth and Finitude: Heidegger’s Transcendental Existentialism,” in Wrathall, Mark A. and Malpas, Jeff (eds.), Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 43–78.Google Scholar
Haugeland, John. 2005. “Reading Brandom Reading Heidegger,” European Journal of Philosophy 13: 421–28.Google Scholar
Haugeland, John. 2013. Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger, ed. Rouse, Joseph (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Heck, Richard. 2000. “Nonconceptual Content and the Space of Reasons,” Philosophical Review 109: 483–523.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Friedrich, Wilhelm. 1972. Werke, vol. iii: Phänomenologie des Geistes (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Friedrich, Wilhelm 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A.V. Miller (Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1st German ed. 1807).Google Scholar
Heinz, Marion and Keller, Sidonie (eds.). 2016. Martin Heideggers ‘Schwarze Hefte’: Eine philosophische Debatte (Berlin: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Held, Klaus. 1988. “Heidegger und das Prinzip der Phaenomenologie,” in Gethmann-Siefert, Annemarie and Poeggeler, Otto (eds.), Heidegger und die praktische Philosophie (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp), 111–39.Google Scholar
Held, Klaus. 1992. “Heidegger and the Principle of Phenomenology,” in Macann, Christopher (ed.), Martin Heidegger: Critical Assessments, vol. ii (London: Routledge), 303–25.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. 1994. The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant’s Philosophy, ed. Velkey, Richard (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Herrmann, F.W. 2000. Hermeneutik und Reflexion: Der Begriff der Phänomenologie bei Heidegger und Husserl (Frankfurt: Klostermann).Google Scholar
Herrmann, F.W. 2013. Hermeneutics and Reflection: Heidegger and Husserl on the Concept of Phenomenology, trans. Kenneth Maly (University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar
Hinderling, Robert. 1982. “Konkurrenz und Opposition in der verbalen Wortbildung,” in Eichinger et al. 1982, 81–106.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Elisabeth Feist. 1978. “The Problem of Speech in Being and Time,” in Elliston, Frederick (ed.), Heidegger’s Existential Analytic (The Hague: Mouton), 159–78.Google Scholar
Höfner, Markus. 2008. Sinn, Symbol, Religion: Theorie des Zeichens und Phänomenologie der Religion (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).Google Scholar
Hornblower, Simon, Spawforth, Anthone, and Eidinow, Esther (eds.). 2012. The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 4th ed. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1939. Erfahrung und Urteil: Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik, ed. Landgrebe, L. (Prague: Academia Verlagsbuchhandlung).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1952. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, vol. ii: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution, ed. Biemel, M. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1959. Phänomenologische Psychologie: Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1925 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1976. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, vol. i: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie, ed. Schuhmann, K. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1977b. Phenomenological Psychology, trans. John Scanlon (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1981. “Husserl’s Inaugural Lecture at Freiburg im Breisgau,” trans. R.W. Jordan, in Husserl: Shorter Works, ed. McCormick, Peter and Elliston, Frederick A. (University of Notre Dame Press; 1st German ed. 1917).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1982. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, vol. i, trans. Kersten, F. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1984. Einleitung in die Logik und Erkenntnistheorie, ed. Melle, Ullrich (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, vol. ii, trans. Rojecewicz, R. and Schuwer, A. (Dordrecht: Kluwer).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1991. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, trans. Dorion Cairns (Dordrecht: Kluwer).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1993. Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Ergänzungsband: Texte aus den Nachlass 1934–1937 (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 2001a. Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic, trans. Anthony J. Steinbock (Dordrecht: Kluwer).Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 2001b. Logical Investigations, trans. J.N. Findlay, ed. Moran, Dermot, 2 vols. (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Ihmdahl, Georg. 1997. Das Leben verstehen: Heideggers formal anzeigenden Hermeneutik in den frühen Freiburger Vorlesungen (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann).Google Scholar
Ijsseling, Samuel. 1986. “Heidegger and the Destruction of Ontology,” in Kockelmans, Joseph J. (ed.), A Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time (Washington, DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America), 3–16.Google Scholar
Jaran, François and Perrin, Christophe. 2013. The Heidegger Concordance, 3 vols. (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Jollivet, Servanne. 2003. “De la guerre au polemos: Le destin tragique de l’être,” Astérion 3 (unpaginated).Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans. 1963. The Gnostic Religion: The Message of the Alien God and the Beginnings of Christianity (Boston: Beacon Press).Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles H. (ed.). 1979. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Paul Guyer (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Käufer, Stephan. 2005b. “The Nothing and the Ontological Difference in Heidegger’s ‘What Is Metaphysics?’” Inquiry 48: 482–506.Google Scholar
Käufer, Stephan. 2011. “On Heidegger on Logic,” Continental Philosophy Review 34/4: 455–76.Google Scholar
Käufer, Stephan. 2013. “Temporality as the Ontological Sense of Care,” in Wrathall, Mark A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time (Cambridge University Press), 338–59.Google Scholar
Käufer, Stephan. 2015. “Jaspers, Limit-Situations, and the Methodological Function of Authenticity,” in McManus 2015c, 95–115.Google Scholar
Keck, Wolfgang and Jovanov, Rastko. 2013. “Technik, Gelassenheit und πολεμος,” Filosofija i Društvo 4: 284–94.Google Scholar
Keiling, Tobias. 2015. Seinsgeschichte und phänomenologischer Realismus (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).Google Scholar
Keller, Pierre. 2000. Husserl and Heidegger on Human Experience (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Soren. 1987. Either/Or, Part 2, trans. Hong, H. and Hong, E. (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Soren. 1997. Christian Discourses/The Crisis and a Crisis in the Life of an Actress, trans. Hong, H. and Hong, E. (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Soren. 2009. Repetition and Philosophical Crumbs, trans. Piety, M. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kim, Alan. 2004. “Shades of Truth: A Phenomenological Approach to the Allegory of the Cave,” Idealistic Studies 34/1: 1–24.Google Scholar
Kim, Alan. 2005. “Frameworks and Foundations: Heidegger and Natorp on Science and Technology,” Angelaki 10/1: 201–18.Google Scholar
Kim, Alan. 2015. “Neo-Kantian Ideas of History,” in De Warren, Nicolas and Staiti, Andrea (eds.), New Approaches to Neo-Kantianism (Cambridge University Press), 39–58.Google Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore. 1993. The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore. 1995. “Why Students of Heidegger Will Have to Read Emil Lask,” Man and World 28: 197–240.Google Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore. 1996. “L’indication formelle de la facticité: Sa genèse et son transformation,” in Courtine, J.-F. (ed.), Heidegger 1919–1929: De l’herméneutique à la métaphysique du Dasein (Paris: Jean Vrin), 205–10.Google Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore. 2002. Heidegger’s Way of Thought: Critical and Interpretive Signposts (London: Continuum).Google Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore. 2014. “Heidegger and our Twenty-First-Century Experience of Ge-Stell,” in Babich, Babette and Ginev, Dimitri (eds.), The Multidimensionality of Hermeneutic Phenomenology (New York: Springer), 137–51.Google Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore. 2017. “How Heidegger Resolved the Tension Between Technological Globalization and Indigenous Localization: A 21st Century Retrieval,” in Zaborowski, Holger (ed.), Heidegger’s Question of Being: Dasein, Truth, and History (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press), 184–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, Adam. 2013. “Toward a Critique of Walten: Heidegger, Derrida and Henological Difference,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy 27/3: 265–76.Google Scholar
Kockelmans, Joseph J. (ed.). 1972. On Heidegger and Language (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996. The Sources of Normativity (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Krell, David Farrell. 1986. Intimations of Mortality: Time, Truth, and Finitude in Heidegger’s Thinking of Being (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press).Google Scholar
Krell, David Farrell. 2015. Ecstasy, Catastrophe: Heidegger from Being and Time to the Black Notebooks (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Krug, W.T. 1832–38. Allgemeines Handwörterbuch der philosophischen Wissenschaften, 5 vols. (Leipzig: Brockhaus).Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Kühnhold, I. 1970. “Beobachtungen zu den Verbalpräfixen ab-, aus-, ent-,” in Moser, H., Eggers, H., Erben, J., Neumann, H. and Steger, H. (eds.), Studien zur Syntax des heutigen Deutsch (Düsseldorf: Schwann Moser), 269–74.Google Scholar
Kühnhold, I. and Wellmann, H. 1973a. Deutsche Wortbildung: Erster Hauptteil: Das Verb (Düsseldorf: Schwann).Google Scholar
Kühnhold, I. H. 1973b. Deutsche Wortbildung: Typen und Tendenzen in der Gegenwartssprache (Düsseldorf: Schwann).Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe. 2007a. Heidegger and the Politics of Poetry, trans. by Jeff Fort (Urbana: University of Illinois Press).Google Scholar
Lafont, Cristina. 2000. Heidegger, Language, and World-Disclosure, trans. Graham Harman (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lafont, Cristina. 2002. “Symposium: Cristina Lafont, Heidegger, Language, and World-Disclosure, Replies,” Inquiry 45: 229–48.Google Scholar
Lafont, Cristina. 2007. “Heidegger and the Synthetic a Priori,” in Crowell and Malpas 2007, 104–18.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1997. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (London: Penguin; 1st ed. 1689).Google Scholar
Löwith, Karl. 1928. Das Individuum in der Rolle des Mitmenschen (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar
Löwith, Karl. 1995. Martin Heidegger and European Nihilism, ed. Wolin, Richard, trans. Gary Steiner (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Luchte, James. 2008. Heidegger’s Early Philosophy: The Phenomenology of Ecstatic Temporality (London: Continuum).Google Scholar
Lüders, Detlev. 2001. “Der ‘Zauber der Welt’ und das heutige ‘Chaos’: Heidegger und die moderne Dominanz des Dürftigen,” Heidegger Studies 17: 21–43.Google Scholar
Lyne, Ian. 2000. “Rickert and Heidegger: On the Value of Everyday Objects,” Kant-Studien 91/2: 204–25.Google Scholar
MacAvoy, Leslie. 2010. “Formal Indication and the Hermeneutics of Facticity,” Philosophy Today 54 (supplement): 84–90.Google Scholar
Malpas, Jeff. 1998. “Death and the unity of a Life,” in Malpas, Jeff and Solomon, Robert (eds.), Death and Philosophy (London: Routledge), 120–34.Google Scholar
Malpas, Jeff. 2006. Heidegger’s Topology: Being, Place, World (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Malpas, Jeff. 2012. Heidegger and the Thinking of Place: Explorations in the Topology of Being (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Malpas, Jeff. 2016. “The Beckoning of Language: Heidegger’s Hermeneutic Transformation of Thinking,” in Bowler, Michael and Farin, Ingo (eds.), Hermeneutical Heidegger (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press), 203–21.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. 1992. “Heidegger and Descartes,” in Macann, Christopher (ed.), Heidegger: Critical Assessments, vol. ii (London: Routledge), 178–207.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. 1998. Reduction and Givenness: Investigations of Husserl, Heidegger, and Phenomenology, trans. Carlson, Thomas A. (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. 2002. Being Given: Toward a Phenomenology of Givenness, trans. Jeffrey L. Kosky (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Martin, Wayne. 2013. “The Semantics of ‘Dasein’ and the Modality of Being and Time,” in Wrathall 2013a, 100–28.Google Scholar
May, Reinhard. 1996. Heidegger’s Hidden Sources: East Asian Influences on his Work, trans. Graham Parkes (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press).Google Scholar
McManus, Denis. 2012. Heidegger and the Measure of Truth: Themes from his Early Philosophy (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
McManus, Denis. 2015a. “Being-towards-death and Owning One’s Judgment,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91: 245–72.Google Scholar
McManus, Denis. 2015b. “On Being as a Whole and Being-a-whole,” in Braver 2015, 175–95.Google Scholar
McManus, Denis. (ed.). 2015c. Heidegger, Authenticity and the Self: Themes from Division Two of Being and Time (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
McMullin, Irene. 2013. Time and the Shared World: Heidegger on Social Relations (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
McNeill, William. 1999. The Glance of the Eye: Heidegger, Aristotle, and the Ends of Theory (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
McNeill, William. 2001. “The Time of Contributions to Philosophy,” in Scott, Charles et al. (eds.), A Companion to Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), 129–40.Google Scholar
McNeill, William. 2006. The Time of Life: Heidegger and Ethos (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
McNeill, William. 2009. “Rethinking the Possible: On the Radicalization of Possibility in Heidegger’s Being and Time,” theory@buffalo 13: 105–25.Google Scholar
McNeill, William. 2012. “From Destruktion to the History of Being,” Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual 2: 24–40.Google Scholar
McNeill, William. 2013a. “In Force of Language: Language and Desire in Heidegger’s Readings of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Θ,” in Powell 2013, 46–62.Google Scholar
McNeill, William. 2013b. “Heidegger’s Hölderlin Lectures,” in Raffoul, François and Nelson, Eric S. (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger (New York: Bloomsbury), 223–36.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2012. The Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Landes, Donald A. (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Michel, Andreas. 1997. “Differentiation vs. Disenchantment: The Persistence of Modernity from Max Weber to Jean-François Lyotard,” German Studies Review 20/3: 343–70.Google Scholar
Milchman, Alan and Rosenberg, Alan. 2003. “Towards a Heidegger/Foucault Auseinandersetzung,” in Milchman, Alan and Rosenberg, Alan (eds.), Foucault and Heidegger: Critical Encounters (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), 1–29.Google Scholar
Misch, Georg. 1931. Lebensphilosophie und Phänomenologie (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew. 2015. The Fourfold: Reading the Late Heidegger (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew J. and Trawny, Peter (eds.). 2017. Heidegger’s Black Notebooks (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Mohanty, J.N. 1988. “Heidegger on Logic,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26: 107–35.Google Scholar
Mongis, Henri. 1976. Heidegger et la critique de la notion de valeur (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
Moran, Dermot. 1994. “The Destruction of the Destruction: Heidegger’s Versions of the History of Philosophy,” in Harries, K. and Jamme, C. (eds.), Martin Heidegger: Politics, Art, and Technology (New York: Holmes & Meier), 175–96.Google Scholar
Moser, H., Eggers, H., Erben, J., Neumann, H., and Steger, H. (eds.). 1970. Studien zur Syntax des heutigen Deutsch (Düsseldorf: Schwann).Google Scholar
Mugerauer, Robert. 2008. Heidegger and Homecoming: The Leitmotif in the Later Writings (University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen. 1996. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Heidegger and Being and Time (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen. 2001. Inheritance and Originality: Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kierkegaard (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc. 2000. Being Singular Plural, trans. R. Richardson and A. O’Byrne (Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc. 2008. “The Being-With of Being-There,” Continental Philosophy Review 41/1: 1–15.Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul. 1994. Platos Ideenlehre: Eine Einführung in den Idealismus (Hamburg: Meiner).Google Scholar
Neske, Günter and Kettering, Emil (eds.). 1990. Martin Heidegger and National Socialism (New York: Paragon House).Google Scholar
Nicholson, Graeme. 1986. “Ecstatic Temporality in Sein und Zeit,” in Kockelmans, Joseph J. (ed.), A Companion to Martin Heidegger’s Being and Time (Washington, DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America), 208–26.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1996. On the Genealogy of Morals, trans. D. Smith (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2012. The Gay Science, trans. Josefine Nauckhoff and Adrian Del Caro (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Nitsche, Martin. 2013. Die Ortschaft des Seins: Martin Heideggers phänomenologische Topologie (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann).Google Scholar
Novak, David. 1985. “Buber’s Critique of Heidegger,” Modern Judaism 5 (Gershom Scholem Memorial Issue): 125–40.Google Scholar
Oberst, Joachim. 2011. Heidegger on Language and Death: The Intrinsic Connection in Human Existence (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Okrent, Mark. 1984. “Hermeneutics, Transcendental Philosophy and Social Science,” Inquiry 27: 23–49.Google Scholar
Okrent, Mark. 2005. “The Truth of Being and the History of Philosophy,” in Dreyfus and Wrathall 2005, 468–83.Google Scholar
Okrent, Mark. 2007. “The ‘I Think’ and the For-the-Sake-of-Which,” in Crowell and Malpas 2007, 151–68.Google Scholar
Olafson, Frederick A. 1975. “Consciousness and Intentionality in Heidegger’s Thought,” American Philosophical Quarterly 12/2: 91–103.Google Scholar
Olafson, Frederick A. 1987. Heidegger and the Philosophy of Mind (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Olafson, Frederick A. 1995. What Is a Human Being? A Heideggerian View (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Olafson, Frederick A. 1998a. “Being, Truth, and Presence in Heidegger’s Thought,” Inquiry 41/1: 45–64.Google Scholar
Olafson, Frederick A. 1998b. Heidegger and the Ground of Ethics: A Study of Mitsein (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Ó Murchadha, Felix. 2013. The Time of Revolution: Kairos and Chronos in Heidegger (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Ott, Heinrich. 1972. “Hermeneutic and Personal Structure of Language,” in Kockelmans, Joseph J. 1972, 169–94.Google Scholar
Otto, Walter Friedrich. 1964. The Homeric Gods: The Spiritual Significance of Greek Religion, trans. Moses Hadas (Boston, MA: Beacon Press).Google Scholar
Oudemans, Theodore C.W. 1990. “Heideggers ‘logische Untersuchungen,’” Heidegger Studies 6: 85–105.Google Scholar
Overgaard, Søren. 2004. Husserl and Heidegger on Being in the World (Dordrecht: Kluwer).Google Scholar
Perry, John. 2005. “Personal Identity, Memory and the Self,” in Østreng, Willy (ed.), Synergies: Interdisciplinary Communications (Oslo: Center for Advanced Study), 16–25.Google Scholar
Petkovšek, R. 1998. Heidegger-Index (1919–1927) (Ljubljana: Teološka Fakulteta Liubliana).Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert. 2003. “Love and Death in Nietzsche,” in Wrathall, Mark A. (ed.), Religion After Metaphysics (Cambridge University Press), 7–28.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert. 2013a. “Heidegger on Nietzsche on Nihilism,” in Pangle, Thomas L. and Harvey Lomax, J. (eds.), Political Philosophy Cross-Examined: Perennial Challenges to the Philosophic Life (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 173–87.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert. 2015. “Heidegger on Nietzsche on Nihilism,” in his Interanimations: Receiving Modern German Philosophy (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Plato. 1977. Werke in acht Bänden, ed. Eigler, Gunther et al. (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar
Plessner, Helmuth. 1975. Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch (Berlin: de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Pöggeler, Otto. 1975. “Metaphysics and Topology of Being in Heidegger,” Man and World 8: 3–27.Google Scholar
Pöggeler, Otto. 1980. “Heideggers Neubestimmung des Phänomenbegriffs,” Phänomenologische Forschungen 9: 124–62.Google Scholar
Pöggeler, Otto. 1987. Martin Heidegger’s Path of Thinking (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International).Google Scholar
Pöggeler, Otto. 1989. “Heideggers logische Untersuchungen,” in Blasche, R., Kohler, W., Kuhlmann, W., and Rohs, P. (eds.), Martin Heidegger: Innen- und Aussenansichten (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp), 75–100.Google Scholar
Pöggeler, Otto. 1994b. “Heidegger on Art,” in Harries, K. and Jamme, C. (eds.), Martin Heidegger: Politics, Art, and Technology (New York: Holmes & Meier), 107–10.Google Scholar
Polt, Richard. 1999. Heidegger: An Introduction (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Polt, Richard. 2006. The Emergency of Being: On Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Polt, Richard. 2013. “The Secret Homeland of Speech: Heidegger on Language, 1933–34,” in Powell 2013, 63–85.Google Scholar
Powell, Jeffrey (ed.). 2013. Heidegger and Language (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Prauss, Gerold. 1977. Erkennen und Handeln in Heideggers Sein und Zeit (Freiburg: Alber).Google Scholar
Raffoul, François. 1998. Heidegger and the Subject (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press).Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Matthew J. 2008. Feelings of Being: Phenomenology, Psychiatry and the Sense of Reality (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Reid, James D. 2005. “Ethical Criticism in Heidegger’s Early Freiburg Lectures,” Review of Metaphysics 59/1: 33–71.Google Scholar
Remington, Clark A. 2012. Originary Temporality: An Essay on Heidegger’s Being and Time and his Interpretation of Kant, Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Richardson, William J. 1968. “Heidegger’s Critique of Science,” New Scholasticism 42: 511–36.Google Scholar
Richardson, William J. 1974. Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought, 3rd ed. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; 1st ed. 1963).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1981. “Phenomenology and Hermeneutics,” in his Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, ed. and trans. Thompson, John B (Cambridge University Press), 101–31.Google Scholar
Riis, Søren. 2011. Zur Neubestimmung der Technik: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Martin Heidegger (Tübingen: Francke).Google Scholar
Rockmore, Tom (ed.). 2000. Heidegger, German Idealism, and Neo-Kantianism (Amherst, NY: Humanity Books).Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Ramón. 1997. La transformación hermenéutica de la fenomenología (Madrid: Tecnos).Google Scholar
Rojcewicz, Richard. 2006. The Gods and Technology: A Reading of Heidegger (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota).Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 1981. “Kuhn, Heidegger, and Scientific Realism,” Man and World 14: 269–90.Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 2005. “Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science,” in Dreyfus and Wrathall 2005, 173–89.Google Scholar
Rousse, B. Scot. 2016a. “Heidegger, Sociality, and Human Agency,” European Journal of Philosophy 24: 417–51.Google Scholar
Rousse, B. Scot. 2016b. “Care, Death, and Time in Heidegger and Frankfurt,” in Altshuler, Roman and Sigrist, Michael J. (eds.), Time and the Philosophy of Action (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Ruin, Hans. 1998. “The Moment of Truth: Augenblick and Ereignis in Heidegger,” Epoché 6: 75–88.Google Scholar
Ruin, Hans. 2005a. “Contributions to Philosophy,” in Dreyfus and Wrathall 2005, 358–74.Google Scholar
Ruin, Hans. 2005b. “Prudence, Passion, and Freedom: On Heidegger’s Ideal of Besinnung,” Giornale di Metafisica 28: 29–52.Google Scholar
Ruin, Hans. 2012. “Thinking in Ruins: Life, Death, and Destruction in Heidegger’s Early Writings,” Comparative and Continental Philosophy 4/1: 15–33.Google Scholar
Sadler, Ted. 2001. Heidegger and Aristotle: The Question of Being (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Safranski, Rüdiger. 1998. Martin Heidegger Between Good and Evil (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Sallis, John. 1984. “Towards the Showing of Language,” in Shahan, Robert W. and Mohanty, Jitendra N. (eds.), Thinking about Being: Aspects of Heidegger’s Thought (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press), 75–84.Google Scholar
Sallis, John. 1986. Delimitations: Phenomenology and the End of Metaphysics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Sallis, John. 1995. “The Identities of the Things Themselves,” in his Delimitations: Phenomenology and the End of Metaphysics, 2nd ed. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), 196–209.Google Scholar
Sallis, John. 2001. “Grounders of the Abyss,” in Scott, Charles E. et al. (eds.), Companion to Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), 181–97.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1956. Being and Nothingness, trans. Hazel Barnes (New York: Washington Square).Google Scholar
Schalow, Frank. 1992. The Renewal of the Heidegger–Kant Dialogue: Action, Thought, and Responsibility (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Schapiro, Meyer. 1994a. “The Still Life as a Personal Object – A Note on Heidegger and van Gogh,” in his Theory and Philosophy of Art: Style, Artist, and Society (New York: George Braziller), 135–42.Google Scholar
Schapiro, Meyer. 1994b. “Further Notes on Heidegger and van Gogh,” in his Theory and Philosophy of Art: Style, Artist, and Society (New York: George Braziller), 143–51.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R. 2005. “Early Heidegger on Sociality,” in Dreyfus and Wrathall 2005, 233–47.Google Scholar
Schear, Joseph K. (ed.). 2013b. Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell–Dreyfus Debate (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. 1973. Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values: A New Attempt Toward the Foundation of an Ethical Personalism, trans. M.S. Frings and R.L. Funk (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press; 1st German ed. 1954).Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. 1980. Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik, 6th ed. (Bern and Munich: Francke).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Dennis J. 2001. On Germans and Other Greeks: Tragedy and Ethical Life (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Schürmann, Reiner. 1990. Heidegger on Being and Acting: From Principles to Anarchy, trans. Christine-Marie Gros (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World, trans. G.Walsh and F. Lehnert (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press; 1st German ed. 1932).Google Scholar
Scott, Charles E. 1970. “Heidegger and Consciousness,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 8: 355–72.Google Scholar
Scott, Charles E. 2001. “The Appearance of Metaphysics,” in Polt, Richard and Fried, Gregory (eds.), A Companion to Heidegger’s Introduction to Metaphysics (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press), 17–33.Google Scholar
Seubold, Günter. 1993. “Heideggers nachgelassene Klee-Notizen,” Heidegger Studies 9: 5–12.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Thomas. 1981. “On Movement and the Destruction of Ontology,” The Monist 64: 534–42.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Thomas. 2001. “A Paradigm Shift in Heidegger Research,” Continental Philosophy Review 34: 183–202.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Thomas. 2015. Making Sense of Heidegger: A Paradigm Shift (London: Rowman & Littlefield).Google Scholar
Sheehan, Thomas and Painter, Corinn. 1999. “Choosing One’s Fate: A Re-reading of Sein und Zeit §74,” Research in Phenomenology 29: 63–82.Google Scholar
Sherover, Charles M. 1971. Heidegger, Kant and Time (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Shirley, Greg. 2010. Heidegger and Logic: The Place of Lógos in Being and Time (London: Continuum).Google Scholar
Sikka, Sonia. 2017. Heidegger, Morality and Politics: Questioning the Shepherd of Being (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Sinnerbrink, Robert. 2008. “Sein und Geist: Heidegger’s Confrontation with Hegel’s Phenomenology,” in Ashton, Paul, Nicolacopoulos, Toula, and Vassilacopoulos, George (eds.), The Spirit of the Age (Melbourne: re.press), 185–204.Google Scholar
Slaby, Jan. 2010. “The Other Side of Existence: Heidegger on Boredom,” in Flach, Sabine, Margulies, Daniel, and Söffner, Jan (eds.), Habitus in Habitat II: Other Sides of Cognition (Bern: Peter Lang), 101–20.Google Scholar
Slaby, Jan. 2015. “Affectivity and Temporality in Heidegger,” in Ubiali, M. and Wehrle, M. (eds.), Feeling and Value, Willing and Action, Phaenomenologica 216 (Dordrecht: Springer), 183–206.Google Scholar
Slaby, Jan. 2017a. “Living in the Moment: Boredom and the Meaning of Existence in Heidegger and Pessoa,” in Feger, H., Dikun, X. and Ge, W. (eds.), Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy, vol. ii (Berlin: de Gruyter), 235–56.Google Scholar
Slaby, Jan. 2017b. “More than a Feeling: Affect as Radical Situatedness,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 41: 7–26.Google Scholar
Slaby, Jan and Stephan, Achim. 2008. “Affective Intentionality and Self-Consciousness,” Consciousness and Cognition 17: 506–13.Google Scholar
Soffer, Gail. 1996. “Heidegger, Humanism, and the Destruction of History,” Review of Metaphysics 49: 547–76.Google Scholar
Sörensen, Paul and Münch, Nikolai (eds.). 2013. Politische theorie und das Denken Heideggers (Bielefeld: Transcript).Google Scholar
Spinosa, Charles. 2005. “Derrida and Heidegger: Iterability and Ereignis,” in Dreyfus and Wrathall 2005, 484–510.Google Scholar
Stafford, Sue and Torres Gregory, Wanda. 2006. “Heidegger’s Phenomenology of Boredom, and the Scientific Investigation of Conscious Experience,” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5: 155–69.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Michael. 2012. Subjectivity and Selfhood in Kant, Fichte, and Heidegger, Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Taminiaux, Jacques. 1989a. “Heidegger lecteur de Descartes,” in Biemel, Walter and von Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm (eds.), Kunst und Technik: Gedächtnisschrift zum 100. Geburtstag von Martin Heidegger (Frankfurt: Klostermann), 109–23.Google Scholar
Taminiaux, Jacques. 1989b. Lectures de l’ontologie fondamentale: Essais sur Heidegger (Grenoble: Millon).Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1992. “Heidegger, Language, and Ecology,” in Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Hall, Harrison (eds.), Heidegger: A Critical Reader (London: Blackwell), 247–69.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2006. “Engaged Agency and Background in Heidegger,” in Guignon 2006b, 202–21.Google Scholar
Theunissen, Michel. 1984. The Other: Studies in the Social Ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre and Buber. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Thomann, Erik. 2004. “Martin Heidegger, ‘Unterwegs zur Sprache’: Ein Denkweg zwischen Selbstbehauptung und Gefolgschaftsorientierung,” in his Die Entmündigung des Menschen durch die Sprache: … und die Suche nach authentischer Subjektivität (Vienna: Passagen), 35–80.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 1999. “Can I Die? Derrida on Heidegger on Death,” Philosophy Today 43: 29–42.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 2004a. “Heidegger’s Perfectionist Philosophy of Education in Being and Time,” Continental Philosophy Review 37: 439–67.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 2004b. “Ontology and Ethics at the Intersection of Phenomenology and Environmental Philosophy,” Inquiry 47: 380–412.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 2005. Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 2007. “On the Advantages and Disadvantages of Reading Heidegger Backward: White’s Time and Death,” Inquiry 50: 103–20.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 2009. “Rethinking Levinas on Heidegger on Death,” Harvard Review of Philosophy 16: 23–43.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 2011b. “Transcendence and the Problem of Otherworldly Nihilism: Taylor, Heidegger, Nietzsche,” Inquiry 54: 140–59.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 2012. “In the Future Philosophy will be Neither Continental nor Analytic but Synthetic: Toward a Promiscuous Miscegenation of (All) Philosophical Traditions and Styles,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 50: 191–205.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 2015. “The Failure of Philosophy: Why Didn’t Being and Time Answer the Question of Being?” in Braver 2015, 285–310.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 2016a. “Heideggerian Phenomenology and the Postmetaphysical Politics of Ontological Pluralism,” in West Gurley, S. and Pfeifer, Geoffrey (eds.), Phenomenology and the Political (London: Rowman & Littlefield International), 19–42.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 2016b. “Rethinking Education After Heidegger: Teaching Learning as Ontological Response-Ability,” Educational Philosophy and Theory 48: 846–61.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 2016c. “Thinking Love: Heidegger and Arendt,” Continental Philosophy Review 50/4: 453–78.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 2017. “Heidegger’s Nazism in the Light of his Early Black Notebooks: A View from America,” in Denker, Alfred and Zaborowski, Holger (eds.), Zur Hermeneutik der Schwarzen Hefte, Heidegger Jahrbuch 10 (Freiburg: Karl Alber), 184–209.Google Scholar
Thomson, Iain and Bodington, Jim. 2014. “Against Immortality: Why Death is Better than the Alternative,” in Blackford, Russell and Broderick, Damian (eds.), Intelligence Unbound (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 248–62.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Torsen, Ingvild. 2014. “What was Abstract Art? (From the Point of View of Heidegger),” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72: 291–302.Google Scholar
Trawny, Peter. 2004. Heidegger und Hölderlin oder der europäische Morgen (Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann).Google Scholar
Trawny, Peter. 2007. “Die Moderne als Weltkrieg: Der Krieg bei Heidegger und Patočka,” Studia Phaenomenologica 7: 377–94.Google Scholar
Trawny, Peter. 2014. Heidegger und der Mythos der jüdischen Weltverschwörung (Frankfurt: Klostermann).Google Scholar
Trawny, Peter and Mitchell, Andrew J. (eds.). 2015. Heidegger, die Juden, noch einmal (Frankfurt: Klostermann).Google Scholar
Tresh, John. 2007. “Technological World-Pictures: Cosmic Things and Cosmograms,” Isis 98: 84–99.Google Scholar
Tugendhat, Ernst. 1970. Der Wahrheitsbegriff bei Husserl und Heidegger (Berlin: de Gruyter)Google Scholar
Vallega-Neu, Daniela. 2001. “Poietic Saying,” in Scott, Charles E. et al. (eds.), Companion to Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), 66–80.Google Scholar
Vallega-Neu, Daniela. 2003. Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy: An Introduction (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Vallega-Neu, Daniela. 2013. “Heidegger’s Poietic Writings: From Contributions to Philosophy to Das Ereignis,” in Powell 2013, 119–45.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Pol. 2012. Heidegger and the Romantics: The Literary Invention of Meaning (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Pol. 2014. “Language as the House of Being? How to Bring Intelligibility to Heidegger While Keeping the Excitement,” Philosophy Compass 9: 253–62.Google Scholar
van Dyk, R.J.A. 1991. “Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik: Zur formalanzeigenden Struktur der philosophischen Begriffe bei Heidegger,” Heidegger Studies 7: 89–109.Google Scholar
Vietta, Silvio. 2015. ‘Etwas rast um den Erdball …’: Martin Heidegger, Ambivalente Existenz und Globalisierungskritik (Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink).Google Scholar
Vogel, Lawrence. 1996. The Fragile ‘We’: Ethical Implications of Heidegger’s Being and Time (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Völker, Ludwig. 1972. “‘Gelassenheit’: Zur Enstehung des Wortes in der Sprache Meister Eckharts und seiner Überlieferung in der Nacheckhartschen Mystik bis Jacob Böhme,” in Hundsnurscher, Franz and Müller, Ulrich (eds.), Getempert und Gemischet: Für Wolfgang Mohr zum 65. Geburtstag von seinen Tübinger Schülern (Göppingen: Alfred Kümmerle), 281–312.Google Scholar
Volpi, Franco. 1996. “Dasein as Praxis: The Heideggerian Assimilation and Radicalization of the Practical Philosophy of Aristotle,” in Macann 1996, 27–66.Google Scholar
von Falkenhayn, Katharina. 2003. Augenblick und Kairos: Zeitlichkeit im Frühwerk Martin Heideggers (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot).Google Scholar
von Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm. 1992. “Way and Method: Hermeneutic Phenomenology in Thinking the History of Being,” in Macann, Christopher (ed.), Martin Heidegger: Critical Assessments, vol. i (London: Routledge), 310–29.Google Scholar
von Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm. 2000. Hermeneutik und Reflexion (Frankfurt: Klostermann).Google Scholar
von Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm. 2013. Hermeneutics and Reflection: Heidegger and Husserl on the Concept of Phenomenology, trans. Kenneth Maly (University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar
von Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm and Alfieri, Francesco. 2017. Die Wahrheit über die Schwarzen Hefte (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot).Google Scholar
Waismann, Friedrich. 1979. Ludwig Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle: Conversations Recorded by Friedrich Waismann, trans. Brian McGuinness and Joachim Schulte (New York: Rowman & Littlefield).Google Scholar
Waldenfels, Bernhard. 2011. Phenomenology of the Other: Basic Concepts, trans. Stähler, T. and Kozin, A. (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Weatherston, Martin. 2002. Heidegger’s Interpretation of Kant: Categories, Imagination, and Temporality (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Wellbery, David. 2003. “Stimmung,” in Barck, Karlheinz et al. (eds.), Ästhetische Grundbegriffe: Historisches Wörterbuch in sieben Bänden, vol. v (Stuttgart: Metzler), 703–33.Google Scholar
White, Carol J. 2005. Time and Death: Heidegger’s Analysis of Finitude, ed. Ralkowski, Mark (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Withy, Katherine. 2012. “The Methodological Role of Angst in Being and Time,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 43: 195–211.Google Scholar
Withy, Katherine. 2013. “The Strategic Unity of Heidegger’s The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 51/2: 161–78.Google Scholar
Withy, Katherine. 2014. “Situation and Limitation: Making Sense of Heidegger on Thrownness,” European Journal of Philosophy 22: 61–81.Google Scholar
Withy, Katherine. 2015a. “Authenticity and Heidegger’s Antigone,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 45: 239–53.Google Scholar
Withy, Katherine. 2015b. Heidegger on Being Uncanny (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Withy, Katherine. 2015c. “Owned Emotions: Affective Excellence in Heidegger and Aristotle,” in McManus 2015c, 21–36.Google Scholar
Withy, Katherine. 2017. “Concealing and Concealment in Heidegger,” European Journal of Philosophy 25: 1496–513.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations, ed. and trans. Anscombe, G.E.M. and Rhees, Rush (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1993. “A Lecture on Ethics,” in his Philosophical Occasions 1912–1951, ed. and trans. Klagge, James C. and Nordmann, Alfred (Indianapolis: Hackett), 36–44.Google Scholar
Wood, David (ed.). 1993. Of Derrida, Heidegger, and Spirit (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. 1999. “Heidegger and Truth as Correspondence,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7/1: 69–88.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. 2000. “Philosophers, Thinkers and Heidegger’s Place in the History of Being,” in Faulconer, James E. and Wrathall, Mark A. (eds.), Appropriating Heidegger (Cambridge University Press), 9–29.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. 2003. “Introduction: Metaphysics and Onto-theology,” in Wrathall, Mark A. (ed.), Religion After Metaphysics (Cambridge University Press), 1–6.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. 2006. “Truth and the Essence of Truth in Heidegger’s Thought,” in Guignon 2006b, 241–67.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. 2011. Heidegger and Unconcealment: Truth, Language and History (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. (ed.). 2013a. The Cambridge Companion to Being and Time (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. 2013b. “Heidegger on Human Understanding,” in Wrathall 2013a, 177–200.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. 2015a. “‘Demanding Authenticity of Ourselves’: Heidegger on Authenticity as an Extra-Moral Ideal,” in Pedersen, Hans and Altman, Megan (eds.), Horizons of Authenticity in Phenomenology, Existentialism, and Moral Psychology (Dordrecht: Springer), 347–68.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. 2015b. “Autonomy, Authenticity, and the Self,” in McManus 2015, 193–214.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. 2017a. “Individuation and Heidegger’s Ontological ‘Intuitionism,’” in Kontos, Pavlos and Fóti, Véronique (eds.), Phenomenology and the Primacy of the Political (New York: Springer), 69–86.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. 2017b. “Making Sense of Human Existence (Heidegger on the Limits of Practical Familiarity),” in Švec, Ondřej and Čapek, Jakub (eds.), Pragmatic Perspectives in Phenomenology (New York: Routledge), 227–41.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. 2017c. “Who is the Self of Everyday Existence,” in Schmid, Bernhard and Thonhauser, Gerhard (eds.), Heidegger and Contemporary Social Theory (Heidelberg: Springer), 9–28.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. 2018. “The Task for Thinking in a Technological Age,” in Wendland, Aaron, Keiling, Tobias, and Merwin, Christopher (eds.), Heidegger on Technology (London: Routledge), 13–38.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark A. and Lambeth, Morganna. 2011. “Heidegger’s Last God,” Inquiry 54: 160–82.Google Scholar
Xolocotzi, Angel. 2002. Der Umgang als Zugang: Der hermeneutisch-phänomenologische Zugang zum faktischen Leben in den frühen Freiburger Vorlesungen Martin Heideggers (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot).Google Scholar
Young, Julian. 1995. “Being and Value: Heidegger Contra Nietzsche,” International Studies in Philosophy 27: 105–16.Google Scholar
Young, Julian. 1998. “Death and Authenticity,” in Malpas, Jeff and Solomon, Robert (eds.), Death and Philosophy (London: Routledge), 112–19.Google Scholar
Young, Julian. 2015. “Was There a ‘Turn’ in Heidegger’s Philosophy?” in Braver 2015, 329–48.Google Scholar
Zaborowski, Holger. 2011. “Heidegger’s Hermeneutics: Towards a New Practice of Understanding,” in Dahlstrom, Daniel O. (ed.), Interpreting Heidegger (Cambridge University Press), 15–41.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. 2004. “Husserl’s Noema and the Internalism-Externalism Debate,” Inquiry 47: 42–66.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. 2015. Self and Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Zaidman, Louise Bruit and Schmitt Pantel, Pauline. 1992. Religion in the Ancient Greek City, trans. Paul Cartledge (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Ziarek, Krzysztof. 2002. “Art, Power, and Politics: Heidegger on Machenschaft and Poiesis,” Contretemps 3: 175–86.Google Scholar
Ziarek, Krzysztof. 2011. “Poietic Justice,” in Ben-Dor, Oren (ed.), Law and Art: Justice, Ethics, Aesthetics (New York: Routledge), 33–44.Google Scholar
Ziarek, Krzysztof. 2014. Language After Heidegger (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Ziegler, Susanne. 2014. “Matter Schein: Zu Heideggers Phänomenologie des Unscheinbaren,” Heidegger Studies 30: 97–108.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Michael E. 1990. Heidegger’s Confrontation with Modernity: Technology, Politics, and Art (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Michael E. 2000. “The End of Authentic Selfhood in the Postmodern Age?” in Wrathall, Mark A. and Malpas, Jeff (eds.), Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 123–48.Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. 2009. “Radical Intellectuals, or, Why Heidegger Took the Right Step (Albeit in the Wrong Direction) in 1933,” in his In Defense of Lost Causes (London: Verso), 148–53.Google Scholar