Abel, L. (1963) Metatheatre: A New View of Dramatic Form. New York.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1984) ‘Female Speech in Latin Comedy’, Antichthon 18: 43–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2003) Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adkin, N. (1994) ‘Terence’s Eunuchus and Jerome’, Rheinisches Museum 137: 187–95.Google Scholar

Ahrens, H.-J. (1970) ‘Arbiter und iudex in den plautinischen Komödien’. Diss. Kiel.Google Scholar

Alexander, J. (1998) ‘Illumination for Cardinal Antoniottio Pallavicini (1442–1507)’ in Brown, M. P. and McKendrick, S. (eds.) Illuminating the Book: Makers and Interpreters: Essays in Honour of Janet Backhouse. London: 191–208.Google Scholar

Allardice, J. T. (1929) Syntax of Terence. London.Google Scholar

Althusser, L. (1962) ‘Le “Piccolo”, Bertolazzi et Brecht (Notes sur un théatre matérialiste)’, Esprit 30.12: 946–65.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. (1979) ‘Plautus’ Trinummus: The Absurdity of Officious Morality’, Traditio 35: 333–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, W. (1993) Barbarian Play: Plautus’ Roman Comedy. Toronto.Google Scholar

Andrews, R. (1993) Scripts and Scenarios: The Performance of Comedy in Renaissance Italy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anonymous (1622) ‘Farce plaisante et récréative, tirée d’un des plus gentils esprits de ce temps’ in Tragédie nouvelle de la perfidie d’Aman, mignon et favori du roi Assuérus. Paris: 28–33.Google Scholar

Apter, E. (2013) Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability. New York.Google Scholar

Aragosti, A. (2009) Frammenti Plautini dalle commedie extravarroniane. Bologna.Google Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (1963) ‘The End of Terence’s Adelphoe. A Postscript’, Greece and Rome 10: 140–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (1964a) ‘The Confrontation of Sostratos and Gorgias’, Phoenix 18: 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (1964b) ‘A Note on the Parallels between Menander’s Dyscolos and Plautus’ Aulularia’, Phoenix 18: 232–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (1970) ‘Phormio parasitus: A Study in Dramatic Methods of Characterisation’, Greece & Rome 17: 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (1972) ‘Targets, Techniques and Traditions in Plautus’ Stichus’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 19: 54–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (1985) ‘Terence’s Prologues’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 5: 1–7.Google Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (1995) ‘Menander’s Manipulation of Language for the Individualization of Character’ in de Martino, F. and Sommerstein, A. H. (eds.) Lo spettacolo delle voci ii. Bari: 147–64.Google Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (2001) ‘Plautus’ Epidicus and Greek Comedy’ in Auhagen, U. (ed.) Studien zu Plautus’ Epidicus. Tübingen: 71–90.Google Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (2003) ‘Diphilus’ ΚΛΗΡΟΥΜΕΝΟΙ and Plautus’ Casina’ in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) Lecturae Plautinae Sarsinates VI: Casina. Urbino: 23–44.Google Scholar

Astin, A. E. (1967) Scipio Aemilianus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Astin, A. E. (1978) Cato the Censor. Oxford.Google Scholar

Aubignac, F. d’ (2001) La Pratique du Théâtre, ed. Baby, Hélène. Paris.Google Scholar

Augoustakis, A. (2007) ‘Surus cor perfrigefacit: Elephants in Plautus’ Pseudolus’, Philologus 151: 177–82.Google Scholar

Augoustakis, A. (2013) ‘Hrotsvit of Gandersheim Christianizes Terence’ in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Augoustakis, A., and Traill, A. (eds.) (2013) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auhagen, U. (2004) ‘Das Hetärenfrühstück (Cist. I 1) – Griechisches und Römisches bei Plautus’ in Hartkamp, R. and Hurka, F. (eds.) Studien zu Plautus’ Cistellaria. Tübingen: 187–210.Google Scholar

Auhagen, U. (2009) Die Hetäre in der griechischen und römischen Komödie. München.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aventin, G. (1858) Œuvres complètes de Tabarin (2 vols). Paris.Google Scholar

Bader, B. (1970) ‘Szenentitel und Szeneneinteilung bei Plautus’. Diss. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Bagordo, A. (2001) Beobachtungen zur Sprache des Terenz: mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der umgangssprachlichen Elemente. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bain, D. (1977) Actors and Audience: A Study of Asides and Related Conventions in Greek Drama. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bain, D. (1979) ‘Plautus Vortit Barbare: Plautus, Bacchides 526–61 and Menander, Dis exapaton 102–12’ in West, D. and Woodman, T. (eds.) Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge: 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bain, D. (1984) ‘Female Speech in Menander’, Antichthon 18: 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1984) Rabelais and His World. Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar

Baldi, P. (2002) The Foundations of Latin. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, T. W. (1944) William Shakspere’s Small Latine and Lesse Greeke (2 vols). Urbana, IL.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2002) ‘Palingenre: Death, Rebirth and Horatian Iambos’ in Paschalis, M. (ed.) Horace and Greek Lyric Poetry. Rethymnon: 47–69.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2009) ‘Roman Perspectives on the Greeks’ in Boys-Stones, G., Graziosi, B. and Vasunia, P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Hellenic Studies. Oxford: 98–113.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, M. (1970) ‘Plauto e il “metateatro” antico’, Il Verri 31: 113–30.Google Scholar

Barner, W. (1989) ‘Studia toto amplectenda pectore. Zu Peter Luders Programmrede vom Jahre 1546’ in Buck, A. and Bircher, M. (eds.) Respublica Guelpherbytana. Amsterdam: 227–51.Google Scholar

Barsby, J. (1986) Plautus: Bacchides. Warminster.Google Scholar

Barsby, J. (1993) ‘Problems of Adaptation in the Eunuchus of Terence’ in Slater, N. W. and Zimmermann, B. (eds.) Intertextualität in der griechisch-römischen Komödie. Stuttgart: 160–79.Google Scholar

Barsby, J. (1999) Terence: Eunuchus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Barsby, J. (2001) Terence. Phormio, The Mother-in-Law, The Brothers. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Barsby, J. (2002) ‘Terence and his Greek Models’ in Questa, C. and Raffaelli, R. (eds.) Due seminari plautini. La tradizione del testo. I modelli. Urbino: 251–77.Google Scholar

Barsby, J. (2004a) ‘Actors and Act-divisions in Poenulus and its Greek Original’ in Baier, T. (ed.) Studien zu Plautus’ Poenulus. Tübingen: 93–111.Google Scholar

Barsby, J. (2004b) ‘Some Aspects of the Language of Cistellaria’ in Hartkamp, R. and Hurka, F. (eds.) Studien zu Plautus’ Cistellaria. Tübingen: 335–45.Google Scholar

Barsby, J. (2007) ‘Native Roman Rhetoric: Plautus and Terence’ in Dominik, W. and Hall, J. (eds.) A Companion to Roman Rhetoric. Malden, MA and Oxford: 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartholomä, A. (2018) ‘Epigenes’ Kampf gegen das Gesetz (Ar. Eccl. 976–1111)’ in Nesselrath, H.-G. and Platschek, J. (eds.), Menschen und Recht. Fallstudien zu Rechtsfragen und ihrer Bedeutung in der griechischen und römischen Komödie. Tübingen: 1–16.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. W. (2005) ‘Plautine Farce and Plautine Freedom: An Essay on the Value of Metatheatre’ in Batstone, W. W. and Tissol, G. (eds.) Defining Genre and Gender in Latin Literature. New York: 13–46.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. W. (2009) ‘The Drama of Rhetoric at Rome’ in Gunderson, E. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric. Cambridge: 212–37.Google Scholar

Beacham, R. C. (1991) The Roman Theatre and its Audience. London.Google Scholar

Beacham, R. C. (2nd edn 1995) The Roman Theatre and its Audience. London.Google Scholar

Beacham, R. C. (forthcoming) Living Theatre: Roman Theatricalism in the Domestic Sphere. New Haven.Google Scholar

Bean, J. R. (1984) ‘Terence Chastened: Two Character Types from the Plays of Hrotsvitha of Gandersheim’, Michigan Academician 16: 383–90.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (2003) ‘The Triumph of the Absurd: Roman Street Theatre’ in Edwards, C. and Woolf, G. (eds.) Rome the Cosmopolis. Cambridge: 21–43.Google Scholar

Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S. (1998) Religions of Rome (2 vols). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Beare, W. (1930) ‘Plautus and the fabula Atellana’, Classical Review 44: 165–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beare, W. (2nd edn 1955, 3rd edn 1964) The Roman Stage: A Short History of Latin Drama in the Time of the Republic. London.Google Scholar

Beaumarchais, P. A. C. de (2003) The Figaro Trilogy, ed. Coward, D.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Beck, E. (1973) ‘Terence Improved: the Paradigm of the Prodigal Son in English Renaissance Comedy’, Renaissance Drama 6: 107–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bekker, E. I. (1892) ‘Die römischen Komiker als Rechtszeugen’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte (Romanistische Abteilung) 13: 53–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellay, J. du (1549) Défense et illustration de la langue française. Paris.Google Scholar

Bennett, C. E. (1910–14) Syntax of Early Latin. Boston.Google Scholar

Benz, L. (1990) ‘Megaronides Censorius – Eine anticatonische Konzeption im plautinischen Trinummus?’ in Blänsdorf, J. (with André, J.-M. and Frick, N.) (eds.) Theater und Gesellschaft im Imperium Romanum. Tübingen: 55–68.Google Scholar

Benz, L. (1995) ‘Die römisch-italische Stegreifspieltradition zur Zeit der Palliata’ in Benz, L., Stärk, E., and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels. Tübingen: 139–54.Google Scholar

Benz, L. (2000) ‘Ein Ausrufermimus im plautinischen Stichus (vv. 218–233)’ in Gödde, S. and Heinze, T. (eds.) Skenika: Beiträge zum antiken Theater und seiner Rezeption. Darmstadt: 165–73.Google Scholar

Benz, L., Stärk, E., and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) (1995) Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Bernstein, E. (1993) ‘Albrecht von Eyb’ in Füssel, S. (ed.) Deutsche Dichter der frühen Neuzeit (1450–1600). Berlin: 96–110.Google Scholar

Bernstein, F. (1998) Ludi publici. Untersuchungen zur Entstehung und Entwicklung der öffentlichen Spiele im republikanischen Rom. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Berschin, W. (2005) ‘Tradition und Neubeginn bei Hrotsvit von Gandersheim († nach 968)’ in Berschin, W. (ed.) Mittellateinische Studien. Heidelberg: 237–48.Google Scholar

Berschin, W. (2001) Hrotsvit – Opera Omnia. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Bertalot, L. (1915) ‘Humanistische Vorlesungsankündigungen in Deutschland im 15. Jahrhundert’, Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Erziehung und des Unterrichts N.F. 5: 1–24.Google Scholar

Bertini, F. (1980) Il ‘Teatro’ di Rosvita – con un saggio di traduzione e di interpretazione del Callimaco. Genoa.Google Scholar

Bertini, F. (1985) ‘Simbologia e struttura drammatica nel Gallicanus e nel Pafnutius di Rosvita’ in Braet, H., Nowé, J. and Tournoy, G. (eds.) The Theatre in the Middle Ages. Leuven: 45–59.Google Scholar

Best, S. (2004) The Fugitive’s Properties: Law and the Poetics of Possession. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettini, M. (2002) ‘I “Witz” di Gelasimus: clichés, modelli culturali, pragmatica dell’umorismo’ in Questa, C. and Raffaelli, R. (eds.) Due seminari plautini. La tradizione del testo. I modelli. Urbino: 227–49.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. (2012) Vertere: un’antropologia della traduzione nella cultura antica. Turin.Google Scholar

Beutner, B. (1974) ‘Der Traum des Abraham’, Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 9: 22–30.Google Scholar

Bexley, E. M. (2014) ‘Plautus and Terence in Performance’ in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York: 462–76.Google Scholar

Bisanti, A. (2005) Un ventennio di studi du Rosvita di Gandersheim. Spoleto.Google Scholar

Blänsdorf, J. (1974) ‘Das Bild der Komödie in der späten Republik’ in Reinhardt, U., Sallmann, K., and Chelius, H. (eds.) Musa Iocosa. Arbeiten über Humor und Witz, Komik und Komödie der Antike. Hildesheim and New York: 141–57.Google Scholar

Blänsdorf, J. (1996) ‘Un trait original de la comédie de Plaute: le goût de la parodie’, Cahiers du groupe interdisciplinaire du théâtre antique 9: 133–51.Google Scholar

Blänsdorf, J. (2003) ‘Atellana fabula’ in Cancik, H. and Schneider, H. (eds.) The New Pauly: Brill’s Encyclopaedia of the Ancient World. Leiden and Boston: vol. 2, cols. 224–6.Google Scholar

Bléry, H. (1965) Syntaxe de la subordination dans Térence. Rome.Google Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (2011) The School of Rome: Latin Studies and the Origins of Liberal Education. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boas, M. (1914) ‘De librorum Catonianorum historia atque compositione’, Mnemosyne 42: 17–46.Google Scholar

Boas, M. (ed.) (1952) Disticha Catonis. Opus post Marci Boas mortem edendum curavit Henricus Johannes Botschuyver. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F. (1977) Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booth, K. (1998) ‘National Mother, Global Whore, and Transnational Femocrats: the Politics of AIDS and the Construction of Women at the World Health Organization’, Feminist Studies 24.1: 115–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boughner, D. C. (1954) The Braggart in Renaissance Comedy. A Study in Comparative Drama from Aristophanes to Shakespeare. Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (2006) An Introduction to Roman Tragedy. London and New York.Google Scholar

Bramante, M. V. (2007) ‘Patres, filii et filiae nelle commedie di Plauto. Note sul diritto nel teatro’ in Cantarella, E. and Gagliardi, L. (eds.) Diritto e teatro in Grecia e a Roma’. Milan: 95–116.Google Scholar

R. Bracht, Branham (ed.) (2005) The Bakhtin Circle and Ancient Narrative. Groningen.Google Scholar

Braun, L. (1970) Die Cantica des Plautus. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Braun, L. (1980) Scenae suppositiciae, oder, Der falsche Plautus. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Braun, M. (2000) ‘Moribus vivitur antiquis – Bemerkungen zur Moral im Trinummus’ in Braun, M., Haltenhoff, A. and Mutschler, F. H. (eds.) Moribus antiquis res stat Romana. Römische Werte und römische Literatur im 3. und 2. Jh. v. Chr. Munich and Leipzig: 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenk, F. E. (1987) ‘Heteros tis eimi: on the Language of Menander’s Young Lovers’, Illinois Classical Studies 12: 31–66.Google Scholar

Briguglio, F. (2010) ‘Barthold Georg Niebuhr und die Entdeckung der Gaius-Institutionen – tatsächlich ein “Glückstern”?’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte (Romanistische Abteilung) 128: 263–97.Google Scholar

Brody, R. (2008) Everything Is Cinema: The Working Life of Jean-Luc Godard. London.Google Scholar

Brophy, R. H. (1974) ‘Mancupium and Mancipatio in Plautus: One Specimen of Plautine Legal Humor and Metaphor’. Diss. Univ. Michigan.Google Scholar

Brothers, A. J. (ed.) (2000) Terence, The Eunuch. Warminster.Google Scholar

Brotherton, B. (1926) The Vocabulary of Intrigue in Roman Comedy. Menasha, WI.Google Scholar

Brown, M. P. (1990, rev. edn 1993) A Guide to Western Historical Scripts from Antiquity to 1600. London and Toronto.Google Scholar

Brown, P. G. McC. (1995) ‘Aeschinus at the Door: Terence, Adelphoe 623–43 and the Traditions of Greco-Roman Comedy’ in Brock, R. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.) Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8. Leeds: 71–88.Google Scholar

Brown, P. G. McC. (2000) ‘Knocking at the Door in Fifth-century Greek Tragedy’ in Gödde, S. and Heinze, T. (eds.) Skenika: Beiträge zum antiken Theater und seiner Rezeption. Darmstadt: 1–16.Google Scholar

Brown, P. G. McC. (2005) ‘The Legal and Social Framework of Plautus’ Cistellaria’, PLLS 12: 53–70.Google Scholar

Brown, P. G. McC. (2013) ‘Greek Comedy and the Atellana’ in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) L’Atellana Preletteraria. Atti della seconda giornata di studi sull’Atellana. Urbino: 7–27.Google Scholar

Brown, P. R. (2004) ‘Hrotsvit’s Sapientia as a Foreign Woman’ in Brown, P. R., McMillin, L. A. and Wilson, K. (eds.) Hrotsvit of Gandersheim – Contexts, Identities, Affinities, and Performances. Toronto: 160–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, P. R. (ed.) (2006) Terence – The Comedies. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brown, P. R., and Wailes, S. L. (eds.) (2012) A Companion to Hrotsvit of Gandersheim (fl. 960): Contextual and Interpretive Approaches. Leiden.Google Scholar

Brown, P. R. (2013) ‘Terence and Greek New Comedy’ in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: 17–32.Google Scholar

Brown, P. R. (2014) ‘The Beginnings of Roman Comedy’ in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York: 401–8.Google Scholar

Büchner, K. (1957) ‘Summum ius summa iniuria’ in Büchner, K. (ed.) Humanitas Romana. Studien über Werke und Wesen der Römer. Heidelberg: 80–105.Google Scholar

Buck, C. H. (1940) A Chronology of the Plays of Plautus. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Buonocore, M. (ed.) (1996) Vedere i classici: l’illustrazione libraria dei testi antichi dall’età romana al tardo Medioevo (exhibition catalogue). Rome.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (2000) ‘“Stumm wie ein Menander-Chor”: Ein zusätzliches Testimonium’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 131: 23–4.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1990, 1999 rev. repr.) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1993) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1997) Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York.Google Scholar

Butler, M. M. (1960) Hrotsvitha – The Theatricality of Her Plays. New York.Google Scholar

Cahn, W. (1996) Romanesque Manuscripts: The Twelfth Century (2 vols). London.Google Scholar

Cain, A. (2013) ‘Terence in Late Antiquity’ in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA and Oxford: 380–96.Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (1997) ‘Zur Pindarode: Horaz und Terenz’, Philologus 141: 86–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calhoun, G. M. (1922, repr. 1968) The Business Life of Ancient Greece. New York.Google Scholar

Candiard, C. (2017) Esclaves et valets vedettes dans les comédies de la Rome antique et de la France d'Ancien Régime. Paris.Google Scholar

Cantarella, E., and Gagliardi, L. (eds.) (2007) Diritto e teatro a Grecia e a Roma. Milan.Google Scholar

Capitani, P. de (2005) Du spectaculaire à l’intime: un siècle de commedia erudita en Italie et en France, début du xvie siècle–milieu du xviie siècle. Paris.Google Scholar

Cardelle de Hartmann, C. (2003) ‘Die Roswitha-Edition des Humanisten Conrad Celtis’ in Henkes, C., Hettche, W., Radecke, G., and Senne, E. (eds.) Schrift – Text – Edition. Tübingen: 137–47.Google Scholar

Cardoso, I. T. (2001) ‘Matronae virtuosae no Stichus de Plauto’, Phaos 1: 21–38.Google Scholar

Cardoso, I. T. (2005) ‘Ars Plautina: Metalinguagem em gestos e figurino’. Unpublished Diss. University of São Paulo (USP).Google Scholar

Cardoso, I. T. (2006) Estico de Plauto. Campinas.Google Scholar

Cardoso, I. T. (2009) ‘Theatrum mundi: Philologie und Nachahmung’ in Schwindt, J. (ed.) Was ist eine philologische Frage?. Frankfurt am Main: 82–111.Google Scholar

Cardoso, I. T. (2010) ‘Ilusão e engano em Plauto’ in Cardoso, Z. A. and Duarte, A. S. (eds.) Estudos sobre o teatro antigo. São Paulo: 95–126.Google Scholar

Cardoso, I. T. (2011) Trompe l’oeil: Philologie und Illusion. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Carney, T. F. (1964) ‘The Words sodes and quaeso in Terentian Usage’, Acta Classica 7: 57–63.Google Scholar

Casson, L. (1976) ‘The Athenian Upper Class and New Comedy’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 106: 29–59.Google Scholar

Casson, L. (1984) Ancient Trade and Society. Detroit.Google Scholar

Caston, R. R. (2014) ‘Reinvention in Terence’s Eunuchus’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 144: 41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cavarero, A. (2016) Inclinations: A Critique of Rectitude, transl. A. S. Sitze and A. Minervini. Stanford.Google Scholar

Cerulli, E. (1970) ‘Le calife ‘Abd ar-Rahmān III de Cordove et le martyr Pélage dans un poème de Hrotsvitha’, Studia Islamica 32: 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamberlain, D. (1980) ‘Musical Learning and Dramatic Action in Hrotsvit’s Pafnutius’, Studies in Philology 77: 319–43.Google Scholar

Chambers, E. K. (1903) The Medieval Stage (2 vols). London.Google Scholar

Charitonidis, S., Kahil, L., and Ginouvès, R. (1970) Les Mosaïques de la Maison du Ménandre à Mytilène. Bern.Google Scholar

Chatelain, E. (1884–1900) Paléographie des classiques latins (2 vols). Paris.Google Scholar

Chelius, K. H. (1989) Die Codices minores des Plautus: Forschungen zur Geschichte und Kritik. Baden-Baden.Google Scholar

Chiarini, G. (ed.) (1992) Tito Maccio Plauto, Casina. Rome.Google Scholar

Christenson, D. M. (2000) Plautus: Amphitruo. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Christenson, D. M. (2008) Plautus: Four Plays (Casina, Amphitryon, Captiui, Pseudolus). Newburyport, MA.Google Scholar

Christenson, D. M. (2010) Roman Comedy: Five Plays by Plautus and Terence. Newburyport, MA.Google Scholar

Christenson, D. M. (2013) ‘Eunuchus’ in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: 262–80.Google Scholar

Cicu, L. (1988) Problemi e strutture del mimo a Roma. Sassari.Google Scholar

Clackson, J., and Horrocks, G. (2007) The Blackwell History of the Latin Language. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clark, A. J. (2007) Divine Qualities: Cult and Community in Republican Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clementi, G. (2009) La filologia plautina negli Adversaria di Adrien Turnèbe. Alessandria.Google Scholar

Cloud, J. D. (1989) ‘Satirists and the Law’ in Braund, S. H. (ed.) Satire and Society in Ancient Rome. Exeter: 49–67.Google Scholar

Clubb, L. G. (1989) Italian Drama in Shakespeare’s Time. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Coffee, N. (2009) The Commerce of War: Exchange and Social Order in Latin Epic. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, E. (1992) Athenian Economy and Society. Princeton.Google Scholar

Cohen, K. (1977) ‘Eisenstein’s Subversive Adaptation’ in Peary, G. and Shatzkin, R. (eds.) The Classic American Novel and the Movies. New York: 245–56.Google Scholar

Collart, J. (1979) Plaute: Curculio. Paris.Google Scholar

Comerci, G. (1994) ‘Humanitas, liberalitas, aequitas: Nuova paideia e mediazione sociale negli Adelphoe di Terenzio’, Bollettino di studi latini 24: 3–44.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. (2007) The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Connors, C. (2004) ‘Monkey Business: Imitation, Authenticity and Identity from Pithekoussai to Plautus’, Classical Antiquity 23: 179–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conrady, K. O. (1954) ‘Zu den deutschen Plautusübertragungen. Ein Überblick von Albrecht von Eyb bis zu J. M. R. Lenz’, Euphorion 48: 373–96.Google Scholar

Cooper, L. (1922) An Aristotelian Theory of Comedy: With an Adaptation of The Poetics, and a Translation of the Tractatus Coislinianus. New York.Google Scholar

Corno, D. del. (1975) ‘Alcuni aspetti del linguaggio di Menandro’, Studi classici e orientali 23: 13–48.Google Scholar

Costa, E. (1890) Il diritto privato romano nelle commedie di Plauto. Turin. (Reprint Rome 1968).Google Scholar

Costa, E. (1893) Il diritto privato nelle commedie di Terenzio. Bologna. (Reprint Rome 1970.)Google Scholar

Costa, L. N. (2013) Plauto, Anfitrião. Campinas.Google Scholar

Coulter, C. C. (1929) ‘The “Terentian” Comedies of a Tenth-Century Nun’, Classical Journal 24: 515–29.Google Scholar

Courcelle, P. (1972) ‘Ambroise de Milan face aux comiques latins’, Revue des études latines 50: 223–31.Google Scholar

Creizenach, W. (1893) Geschichte des neuren Dramas I (Mittelalter und Frührenaissance). Halle.Google Scholar

Crook, J. A. (1967) ‘Patria Potestas’, Classical Quarterly 17: 113–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Csapo, E. (1999) ‘Performance and Iconographic Tradition in the Illustrations of Menander’ in Porter, J. (ed.) Crossing the Stages: The Production, Performance and Reception of Ancient Theater. Iowa City: 154–77.Google Scholar

Csapo, E. (2000) ‘From Aristophanes to Menander? Genre Transformation in Greek Comedy’ in Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.) Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MA: 115–34.Google Scholar

Csapo, E. (2010) ‘Cooking with Menander: Slices from the Ancient Home Entertainment Industry?’ in Csapo, E. (ed.) Actors and Ancient Theater. Malden, MA: 140–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Csapo, E., and Slater, W. J. (eds.) (1994) The Context of Ancient Drama. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Dahlheim, A. W. (1968) Struktur und Entwicklung des römischen Völkerrechts im 3. und 2. Jahrhundert v. Chr. Munich.Google Scholar

Damen, M. L. (1990) ‘Structure and Symmetry in Terence’s Adelphoe’, Illinois Classical Studies 15: 85–106.Google Scholar

Damen, M. L. (1992) ‘Translating Scenes: Plautus’ Adaptation of Menander’s Dis Exapaton’, Phoenix 46: 205–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damen, M. L. (1995) ‘“By the Gods, Boy … Stop Bothering Me! Can’t You Tell Menander from Plautus?” Or How Dis Exapaton Does Not Help Us Understand Bacchides’, Antichthon 29: 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damon, C. (4th edn 2000) The Mask of the Parasite. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Danese, R. M. (1985) ‘Plauto, Pseud. 702–705a: la “costruzione stilistica” di un eroe perfetto’, Materiali e discussioni 14: 101–12.Google Scholar

Danese, R. M. (1989) ‘Revisione del P. Vindob. L 103 (Terenzio)’, SCO 39: 133–57.Google Scholar

Danese, R. M. (2006) ‘Plauto e l’urbanitas del dialetto’, Linguistica e Letteratura 31: 37–66.Google Scholar

Danese, R. M. (2002) ‘Modelli letterari e modelli culturali del teatro plautino’ in Questa, C. and Raffaelli, R. (eds.) Due seminari plautini. La tradizione del testo. I modelli. Urbino: 133–53.Google Scholar

Dareste, R. (1892) ‘Review of Costa 1890’, Journal de Savants 1892: 145–54, reprinted with slight modifications in R. Dareste (1902) Nouvelles études d’histoire du droit, as part of ‘Le droit romain et le droit grec dans Plaute’. Paris: 149–63.Google Scholar

Dareste, R. (1900) ‘Review of Costa 1890, Becker 1892, Pernard 1900 et al.’, Nouvelle revue historique de droit français et étranger 24: 677–87, reprinted with slight modifications in R. Dareste (1902) Nouvelles études d’histoire du droit, as part of ‘Le droit romain et le droit grec dans Plaute’. Paris: 163–75.Google Scholar

Daviault, A. (1981) Comoedia Togata. Fragments. Paris.Google Scholar

De Certeau, M. (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar

De Luca, K. (1974) ‘Hrotsvit’s “Imitation” of Terence’, Classical Folia 28: 89–102.Google Scholar

De Man, P. (1985) ‘“Conclusions”, Walter Benjamin’s “The Task of the Translator” Messenger Lecture, Cornell University, March 4, 1983’, Yale French Studies 69: 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Melo, W. D. C. (2007) The Early Latin Verbal System: Archaic Forms in Plautus, Terence, and Beyond. Oxford.Google Scholar

De Melo, W. D. C. (2010) ‘The Language of Atellan Farce’ in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) L’Atellana letteraria: Atti della prima giornata di studi sull’Atellana: Succivo (CE) 30 Ottobre 2009. Urbino: 121–55.Google Scholar

De Melo, W. D. C. (2011a) ‘The Language of Roman Comedy’ in Clackson, J. (ed.) A Companion to the Latin Language. Malden, MA: 321–43.Google Scholar

De Melo, W. D. C. (2011b) Plautus: Amphitryon; The Comedy of Asses; The Pot of Gold; The Two Bacchises; The Captives. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

De Melo, W. D. C. (2011c) Plautus: Casina; The Casket Comedy; Curculio; Epidicus; The Two Menaechmuses. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

De Melo, W. D. C. (2013) Plautus: Stichus; Three-Dollar Day; Truculentus; The Tale of a Travelling-Bag; Fragments. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

De Zulueta, F. (1946) The Institutes of Gaius. Part 1. Text with Critical Notes and Translation. Oxford.Google Scholar

Debouy, E. (2010) ‘The Titles of the Atellanae: an Attempt at a Typology’ in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) L’Atellana letteraria: Atti della prima giornata di studi sull’Atellana: Succivo (CE) 30 Ottobre 2009. Urbino: 157–68.Google Scholar

Dees, R. L. (1988) ‘Aspects of the Roman Law of Marriage in Plautus’ Casina’, Iura 39: 107–20.Google Scholar

Del Zotto, C. (2009) Rosvita – La poetessa degli imperatori sassoni (Donne d’Oriente e d’Occidente 22). Milan.Google Scholar

Delehaye, H. (1936) Étude sur le légendier romain – Les saints de novembre et de décembre. Brussels: 227–35.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. (1986) Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature, transl. D. Polan and R. Bensmaïa. Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Denard, H. (2007) ‘Lost Theatre and Performance Traditions in Greece and Italy’ in McDonald, M. and Walton, M. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Theatre. Cambridge: 139–60.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1985) ‘Deconstruction in America: An Interview with Jacques Derrida’, Critical Exchange 17: 1–33.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1996) Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression, transl. E. Prenowitz. Chicago.Google Scholar

Dessen, C. S. (1977) ‘Plautus’ Satiric Comedy: the Truculentus’, Philological Quarterly 56: 145–68.Google Scholar

Dessen, C. S. (1995) ‘The Figure of the Eunuch in Terence’s Eunuchus’, Helios 22: 123–39.Google Scholar

Detienne, M., and Vernant, J.-P. (1991) Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society, transl. J. Lloyd. Chicago.Google Scholar

Deufert, M. (2002) Textgeschichte und Rezeption der plautinischen Komödien im Altertum. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Di Benedetto, A. (1962) ‘Echi terenziani in Orazio’, Rendiconti della Accademia di Archeologia, Lettere e Belle Arti di Napoli, N.S. 37: 35–57.Google Scholar

Dickey, E., and Chahoud, A. (2010) Colloquial and Literary Latin. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickie, M. W. (1981) ‘The Disavowal of Invidia in Roman Iamb and Satire’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 3: 183–208.Google Scholar

Diderot, D. (1971) Œuvres complètes, ed. Lewinter, Roger (15 vols). Paris.Google Scholar

Dietl, C. (2005) Die Dramen Jacob Lochers und die frühe Humanistenbühne im süddeutschen Raum. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dittrich, P. (1915) ‘Plautus und Terenz in Pädagogik und Schulwesen der deutschen Humanisten’. Diss. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Dixon, S. (1992) Roman Family. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, S. (2001) Childhood, Class and Kin in the Roman World. London.Google Scholar

Dobrov, G. W. (2001) Figures of Play: Greek Drama and Metafictional Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dolezal, M. L. (1996) ‘The Elusive Quest for the “Real Thing”: The Chicago Lectionary Project Thirty Years On’, Gesta 35: 128–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donadio, N. (2007) ‘Le auctiones private all’epoca di Plauto’ in Cantarella, E. and Gagliardi, L. (eds.) Diritto e teatro in Grecia e a Roma’. Milan: 117–97.Google Scholar

Donderer, M. (2008) ‘Antike Musterbücher und (k)ein Ende: Ein neuer Papyrus und die Aussage der Mosaiken’, Musiva et Sectilia 2–3: 81–113.Google Scholar

Douglas, M. (1999) Implicit Meanings: Selected Essays in Anthropology. London and Boston.Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1972) Aristophanic Comedy. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Dressler, A. (2016) ‘Plautus and the Politics of Property: Reification, Recognition, and Utopia’, MD 77: 9–56.Google Scholar

Dronke, P. (1984) ‘Hrotsvitha’ in Dronke, P. (ed.) Women Writers of the Middle Ages – A Critical Study of Texts from Perpetua († 203) to Marguerite Porete († 1310). Cambridge: 55–83.Google Scholar

Duckworth, G. E. (1952/1994) The Nature of Roman Comedy. A Study in Popular Entertainment, Princeton, NJ. Second edition (1994) with a foreword and bibliographical appendix by R. Hunter, Norman, OK, and Bristol.Google Scholar

Dunn, W. R. (1984) ‘Formal Language in Plautus’. Diss. Harvard.Google Scholar

Dutsch, D. (2002) ‘Towards a Grammar of Gesture. A Comparison Between Types of Hand Movements of the Actor and the Orator in Quintilian’s Institutio oratoria 11.3.85–184’, Gesture 2.2: 259–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dutsch, D. (2004) ‘Female Furniture: a Reading of Plautus’ Poenulus 1141–6’, Classical Quarterly 54.2: 625–30.Google Scholar

Dutsch, D. (2005) ‘Roman Pharmacology: Plautus’ blanda venena’, Greece and Rome 52.2: 205–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dutsch, D. (2008) Feminine Discourse in Roman Comedy: On Echoes and Voices. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dutsch, D., and Konstan, D. (2011) ‘Women’s Emotions in New Comedy’ in Munteanu, D. (ed.) Emotion, Genre, Gender in Antiquity. London: 57–88.Google Scholar

Dutsch, D., James, S., and Konstan, D. (2015) Women in Republican Roman Drama. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Eagleton, T. (1981) Walter Benjamin, or Towards a Revolutionary Criticism. London.Google Scholar

Easterling, P., and Hall, E. (eds.) (2002) Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (1993) The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrman, R. K. (1985) ‘Terentian Prologues and the Parabases of Old Comedy’, Latomus 44: 370–6.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. R., et al. (eds.) (2004) Records of Early English Drama (2 vols). Oxford and Toronto.Google Scholar

Ernout, A. (2nd edn 1957) Plautus, Titus Maccius: Pseudolus. Rudens. Stichus. Paris.Google Scholar

Ernout, A., and Thomas, F. (1972) Syntaxe latine. Paris.Google Scholar

Fabricius, J. A. (2nd edn 1719) Codex apocryphus Novi Testamenti, ii. Hamburg.Google Scholar

Fachechi, G. M. (1998) ‘Amphitruo Illustrato’ in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (ed.) Lecturae Plautinae Sarsinates I Amphitruo. Urbino: 89–96.Google Scholar

Fachechi, G. M. (2002) ‘Plauto illustrato fra Medioevo e Umanesimo’, Rendiconti dell’Accademia dei Lincei 13: 177–242.Google Scholar

Falcone, G. (1988) ‘Testimonianze Plautine in tema di interdicta’, Annali del Seminario Giuridico dell’Univ. di Palermo 40: 175–213.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1965) ‘The Curculio of Plautus: An Illustration of Plautine Methods in Adaptation’, Classical Quarterly 59: 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, E. (1968a) ‘Terence, Diphilus and Menander: A Reexamination of Terence Adelphoe Act II’, Philologus 112: 196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, E. (1968b) ‘Act IV of the Menaechmi: Plautus and His Greek Original’, Classical Philology 63: 175–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, E. (1972) Comparative Studies in Republican Latin Imagery. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, E. (1975) ‘Sex, Status, and Survival in Hellenistic Athens: a Study of Women in New Comedy’, Phoenix 29: 44–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantham, E. (1978) ‘Adaptation and Survival: A Genre Study of Roman Comedy in Relation to Its Greek Sources’ in Ruggiers, P. G. (ed.) Versions of Medieval Comedy. Norman, OK: 297–317.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1988) ‘Mime: The Missing Link in Roman Literary History’, The Classical World 82: 153–63.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1993) ‘The Growth of Literature and Criticism at Rome’ in Kennedy, G. A. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, I: Classical Criticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2000) ‘DOMINA-tricks’ in Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) Dramatische Wäldchen. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York: 287–99.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2002) ‘Orator and/et Actor’ in Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.) Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge: 362–76.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2004a) ‘Women of the Demi-monde and Sisterly Solidarity in the Cistellaria’ in Hartkamp, R. and Hurka, F. (eds.) Studien zu Plautus’ Cistellaria. Tübingen: 221–38.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2004b) ‘Maiden in Other-land or Broads Abroad: Plautus’ Poenulae’ in Baier, T. (ed.) Studien zu Plautus’ Poenulus. Tübingen: 235–51.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2004c) ‘Literature of the Roman Republic’ in Flower, H. I. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic. Cambridge: 271–93.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2004d) ‘Terence and the Familiarisation of Comedy’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Rethinking Terence. Ramus 33: 20–34.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2004e) ‘Disowning and Dysfunction in the Declamatory Family’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 53: 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farmer, J. (ed.) (1906) Early English Dramatists. Anonymous Plays, Third Series. London.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (1998) Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (2006) ‘Review of Goldberg 2005’, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2006.08.45.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (2010) ‘Crediting Pseudolus: Trust, Belief, and the Credit Crunch in Plautus’ Pseudolus’, Classical Philology 105: 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. (2016) Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. (2000) Slavery and the Roman Literary Imagination. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flamerie de Lachapelle, G. (2011) Publius Syrus. Sentences. Paris.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (ed.) (2004) The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fögen, T. (2009) ‘Sermo corporis: Ancient Reflections on gestus, vultus and vox’ in Fögen, T. (ed.) Bodies and Boundaries in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin and New York: 15–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fontaine, M. (2010) Funny Words in Plautine Comedy. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Fontaine, M. (2014a) ‘Between Two Paradigms: Plautus’ in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York: 516–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fontaine, M. (2014b) ‘The Terentian Reformation: From Menander to Alexandria’ in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York: 538–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fontaine, M. (2014c) ‘Dynamic of Appropriation in Roman Comedy: Menander’s Kolax in Three Roman Receptions (Naevius, Plautus, and Terence’s Eunuchus)’ in Olson, S. D. (ed.) Ancient Comedy and Reception: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Henderson. Berlin and Boston: 180–202.Google Scholar

Fontaine, M. (2014d) ‘The Reception of Greek Comedy in Rome’ in Revermann, M. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Greek Comedy. Cambridge: 404–23.Google Scholar

Fontaine, M. (2015) Joannes Burmeister: Aulularia and other Inversions of Plautus. Leuven.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fontaine, M., and Scafuro, A. (eds.) (2014) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forehand, W. E. (1973) ‘The Use of Imagery in Plautus’ Miles Gloriosus’, Rivista di studi classici 21: 5–16.Google Scholar

Fortier, M. (2002) Theory/Theatre: An Introduction. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortson, IV, B. W. (2008) Language and Rhythm in Plautus. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fournier, E. (ed.) (1858) Chansons de Gaultier-Garguille. Paris.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1922) Plautinisches im Plautus. Berlin. (Translated into Italian (1960) Elementi Plautini and into English (2007) Plautine Elements.)Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1935) ‘Naevius’, Paulys Realencyclopädie Suppl. 6: 622–40.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1960) Elementi Plautini in Plauto. Florence. (Translation with addenda of Plautinisches im Plautus, Berlin (1922).)Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (2007) Plautine Elements in Plautus, Oxford. (Translation by Tomas Drevikovsky and Frances Muecke of Plautinisches im Plautus, Berlin (1922).)Google Scholar

Frangoulidis, S. (1994) ‘Palaestrio as Playwright: Plautus, Miles Gloriosus 209–212’ in Deroux, C. (ed.) Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VII. Brussels: 72–86.Google Scholar

Frangoulidis, S. (1995) ‘The Parasite as Poet-playwright and the Slave as Parasite in Terence’s Phormio’, Bollettino di studi latini 25.2: 397–425.Google Scholar

Frangoulidis, S. (1996) ‘(Meta)theatre as Therapy in Terence’s Phormio’, Classica et Mediaevalia 47: 169–206.Google Scholar

Frangoulidis, S. (2013) ‘Phormio’ in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.), A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: 281–94.Google Scholar

Franko, G. F. (1999) ‘Imagery and Names in Plautus’ Casina’, Classical Journal 95: 1–17.Google Scholar

Franko, G. F. (2013) ‘Terence and the Traditions of Roman New Comedy’ in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA and Oxford: 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franko, G. F. (2014) ‘Festivals, Producers, Theatrical Spaces, and Records’ in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Frassinetti, P. (1953) Fabula Atellana. Saggio sul teatro popolare latino. Genoa.Google Scholar

Frauenfelder, D. W. (1996) ‘Respecting Terence, Adelphoe 155–75’, Classical World 90: 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fredershausen, O. (1906) ‘De iure Plautino et Terentiano’. Diss. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Fredershausen, O. (1912) ‘Weitere Studien über das Recht bei Plautus und Terenz’, Hermes 47: 199–249.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1957–81) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud XI. London.Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, M. (1971) ‘Philologische Bemerkungen zur Sentenz “Summum ius summa iniuria”’ in Studi in onore di Edoardo Volterra II. Milan: 53–81.Google Scholar

Gaertner, J. F. (2011a) Das antike Recht und die griechisch-römische Neue Komödie: Untersuchungen zu Plautus und seinen griechischen Vorbildern I (2 vols). Habil. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Gaertner, J. F. (2011b) Das antike Recht und die griechisch-römische Neue Komödie: Untersuchungen zu Plautus und seinen griechischen Vorbildern II (2 vols). Habil. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Gaertner, J. F. (2018) ‘Die Funktion des mancipium in der römischen Komödie’ in Nesselrath, H.-G and Platschek, J. (eds.), Menschen und Recht. Fallstudien zu Rechtsfragen und ihrer Bedeutung in der griechischen und römischen Komödie. Tübingen: 137–61.Google Scholar

Gagarin, M. (2005) ‘The Unity of Greek Law’ in Gagarin, M. and Cohen, D. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law. Cambridge: 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gagliardi, L. (2007) ‘La figura del giudice privato del processo civile romano. Per un’analisi storico-sociologica sulla base delle fonti letterarie (da Plauto a Macrobio)’ in Cantarella, E. and Gagliardi, L. (eds.) Diritto e teatro in Grecia e a Roma. Milan: 199–217. (Reprinted in German with slight modifications as Gagliardi (2008)).Google Scholar

Gagliardi, L. (2008) ‘Zur Figur des iudex privatus im römischen Zivilprozess. Eine historisch-soziologische Untersuchung auf der Grundlage literarischer Quellen’, Revue internationale des droits de l’antiquité 55: 241–66. (= German version of Gagliardi (2007) with slight modifications.)Google Scholar

Gaiser, K. (1972) ‘Zur Eigenart der römischen Komödie: Plautus und Terenz gegenüber ihren griechischen Vorbildern’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt I.2. Berlin and New York: 1027–113.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1966) ‘Scipionic Themes in Plautus’ Amphitruo’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 97: 203–35.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1969) ‘Plautus’ Poenulus and the Cult of Venus Erycina’ in Bibauw, J. (ed.) Hommages à Marcel Renard I. Brussels: 358–64.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1996) Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Hopkins, K., and Whittaker, R. (eds.) (1983) Trade in the Ancient Economy. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Germany, R. (2013) ‘Andria’ in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: 225–42.Google Scholar

Gerschner, R. (2002) Die Deklination der Nomina bei Plautus. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1971) Rintone e il teatro in Magna Grecia. Naples.Google Scholar

Gilbert, A. H. (1913) ‘Thomas Heywood’s Debt to Plautus’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology 12: 593–611.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. (2007) Paideia Romana. Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gilleland, M. E. (1979) ‘Linguistic Differentiation of Character Type and Sex in the Comedies of Plautus and Terence’. Diss. Charlottesville.Google Scholar

Gilula, D. (1978) ‘Where Did the Audience Go?’, Scripta Classica Israelica 4: 45–9.Google Scholar

Gilula, D. (1980) ‘The Concept of bona meretrix: A Study of Terence’s Courtesans’, Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica 108: 142–65.Google Scholar

Gilula, D. (1981) ‘Who’s Afraid of Rope-walkers and Gladiators? (Ter. Hec. 1–57)’, Athenaeum 59: 29–37.Google Scholar

Gilula, D. (1989) ‘Greek Drama in Rome: Some Aspects of Cultural Transposition’ in Scolnicov, H. and Holland, P. (eds.) The Play Out of Context. Transferring Plays from Culture to Culture. Cambridge: 99–109.Google Scholar

Giovini, M. (2001) ‘Riscritture Terenziane – il motivo delle “nozze simulate” nel Gallicanus’, Maia 53: 649–73.Google Scholar

Giovini, M. (2003) Rosvita e l’imitari dictando terenziano. Genoa.Google Scholar

Giovini, M. (2006a) ‘Elementi poetici e drammatici nel Delusor (X sec.)’, Studi umanistici piceni 26: 126–47.Google Scholar

Giovini, M. (2006b) ‘La cucina infernale e la mirabile illusione: Il Dulcitius di Rosvita fra drammaturgia e innografia’, Mediaevalia 27: 155–83.Google Scholar

Giovini, M. (2007) Un conflictus terenziano del X secolo: il Delusor. Milan.Google Scholar

Girard, P. F. (1893) ‘Review of Costa 1890, Bekker 1892 et al.’, Nouvelle revue historique de droit français et étranger 17: 789–97.Google Scholar

Giraudoux, J. (1967) Three Plays, Volume 2 – Siegfried; Amphitryon 38; Electra, transl. Phyllis La Farge and Peter Judd. London.Google Scholar

Goddard Elliott, A. (1984) Seven Medieval Latin Comedies. New York.Google Scholar

Goetting, H. (1950) ‘Die Anfänge des Reichsstifts Gandersheim’, Braunschweigisches Jahrbuch 31: 5–52.Google Scholar

Goetting, H. (1973) Die Bistümer der Kirchenprovinz Mainz – Das Bistum Hildesheim I: Das Reichsunmittelbare Kanonissenstift Gandersheim. Berlin.Google Scholar

Gold, B. (1998) ‘“Vested Interests” in Plautus’ Casina: Cross-Dressing in Roman Comedy’, Helios 25: 17–29.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. (1983) ‘Terence, Cato, and the Rhetorical Prologue’, Classical Philology 78: 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, S. (1986) Understanding Terence. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, S. (1989) ‘Poetry, Politics, and Ennius’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 119: 247–61.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. (1990) ‘Act to Action in Plautus’ Bacchides’, Classical Philology 85: 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, S. (1995) ‘Improvisation, Plot, and Plautus’ Curculio’ in Benz, L., Stärk, E., and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels. Tübingen: 33–41.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. (1998) ‘Plautus on the Palatine’, Journal of Roman Studies 88: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, S. (2000) ‘Catullus 42 and the Comic Legacy’ in Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) Dramatische Wäldchen. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York: 475–89.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. (2004) ‘Plautus and his Alternatives. Textual Doublets in Cistellaria’ in Hartkamp, R. and Hurka, F. (eds.) Studien zu Plautus’ Cistellaria. Tübingen: 385–98.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. (2005) Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic. Poetry and its Reception. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, S. (2007a) ‘Comedy and society from Menander to Terence’ in McDonald, M. and Walton, M. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Theatre. Cambridge: 124–38.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. (2007b) ‘Reading Roman Tragedy’, International Journal of the Classical Tradition 13.4: 571–84.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. (2007c) ‘The Early Republic: the Beginnings to 90 BC’ in Harrison, S. (ed.) A Companion to Latin Literature. Oxford: 15–30.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. (ed.) (2013) Terence, Hecyra. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. (2018) ‘Theater without Theaters: Seeing Plays the Roman Way’, TAPA 148: 139–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldoni, C. (1787) Mémoires de Goldoni, pour servir à l’histoire de ma vie et à celle du théâtre. Paris.Google Scholar

Gordan, P. W. G. (1974) Two Renaissance Book Hunters: The Letters of Poggius Bracciolini to Nicholaus de Niccolis. New York and London.Google Scholar

Gotter, U. (2008) ‘Cultural Differences and Cross-Cultural Contact: Greek and Roman Concepts of Power’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 104: 179–230.Google Scholar

Goullet, M. (1993) ‘Les drames de Hrotsvita de Gandersheim, édition critique avec introduction, traduction, et notes.’ Diss. Metz.Google Scholar

Goullet, M. (ed.) (1999) Hrotsvita – Théâtre. Paris.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (1993) The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gowers, E. (2004) ‘The Plot Thickens: Hidden Outlines in Terence’s Prologues’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Rethinking Terence. Ramus 33: 150–66.Google Scholar

Graf, F. (1992) ‘Gestures and Conventions: the Gestures of Roman Actors and Orators’ in Bremmer, J. and Roodenburg, H. (eds.) A Cultural History of Gesture. Ithaca, NY: 36–58.Google Scholar

Grant, J. N. (1975) ‘The Ending of Terence’s Adelphoe and the Menandrian original’, American Journal of Philology 96: 42–60.Google Scholar

Grant, J. N. (1986) Studies in the Textual Tradition of Terence. Toronto, Buffalo, NY, and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (1973) ‘Titus Maccius Plautus’, Classical Quarterly 23: 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (1982a) ‘Drama’ in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Classical Literature II: Latin Literature. Cambridge: 77–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (1982b) ‘Light Drama’ in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Classical Literature II: Latin Literature. Cambridge: 93–127. (= Subsection of Gratwick, (1982a).)Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (1987) Terence: The Brothers. Warminster.Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (ed.) (1993) Plautus: Menaechmi. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (1995) ‘The Schizophrenic Lover and the Logic of Farce: Plautus, Bacchides 500–511’ in Benz, L., Stärk, E., and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels. Tübingen: 97–106.Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (ed.) (2nd edn 1999) Terence: The Brothers. Warminster.Google Scholar

Green, J. R. (1985) ‘Drunk Again: A Study in the Iconography of the Comic Theater’, American Journal of Archeology 89: 465–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, J. R. (1994) Theatre in Ancient Greek Society. London.Google Scholar

Green, P. (1993) Alexander to Actium: The Historical Evolution of the Hellenistic Age. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Greenberg, N. A. (1979–80) ‘Success and Failure in the Adelphoe’, CW 73: 221–36.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (2007) ‘“Telling the Tale”: A Performing Tradition from Homer to Pantomime’ in McDonald, M. and Walton, M. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Theatre. Cambridge: 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grilli, A. (1979) ‘Educazione urbana ed educazione rustica in Terenzio’ in La città antica come fatto di cultura: Atti del convegno di Como e Bellagio, 16–19 giugno 1979. Como: 23–34.Google Scholar

Grimal, P. (1986) ‘Analyse du Trinummus et les débuts de la philosophie à Rome’ in Grimal, P. (ed.) Rome. La literature et l’histoire I. Rome: 363–75.Google Scholar

Grimm, H. (1974) ‘Des Conradus Celtis Editio Princeps der Opera Hrotsvite von 1501 und Albrecht Dürers Anteil daran’, Philobiblon 18: 3–25.Google Scholar

Grube, G. M. A. (1965) The Greek and Roman Critics. Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1990) Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Leiden, New York, Copenhagen and Cologne. (Paperback edition: Berkeley and London (1996)).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1992) Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Guardì, T. (1974) Cecilio Stazio. I frammenti. Palermo.Google Scholar

Guardì, T. (1981) ‘Note sulla lingua di Titinio’, Pan 7: 145–65.Google Scholar

Guardì, T. (1985) Titinio e Atta. Fabula togata. I frammenti. Milan.Google Scholar

Guastella, G. (1988) La contaminazione e il parassita. Due studi su teatro e cultura romana. Pisa.Google Scholar

Guastella, G. (2002) ‘I monologhi di ingresso dei parassiti: Plauto e i modeli’ in Questa, C. and Raffaelli, R. (eds.) Due seminari plautini. La tradizione del testo. I modelli. Urbino: 155–98.Google Scholar

Gunderson, E. (2000) Staging Masculinity: The Rhetoric of Performance in the Roman World. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunderson, E. (2009) Nox Philologiae. Aulus Gellius and the Fantasy of the Roman Library. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Gunderson, E. (2015) Laughing Awry: Plautus and Tragicomedy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunderson, E. (2017) ‘Rhetoric and Declamation’ in MacDonald, M. J. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Rhetorical Studies. Oxford: 267–78.Google Scholar

Günther, O. (1886) Plautuserneuerungen in der deutschen Literatur des XV.–XVII. Jahrhunderts und ihre Verfasser. Diss. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. (1998) The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hadot, I. (1997) ‘Geschichte der Bildung: Artes liberales’ in Graf, F. (ed.) Einleitung in die lateinische Philologie. Stuttgart and Leipzig: 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haffter, H. (1934) Untersuchungen zur altlateinischen Dichtersprache. Berlin.Google Scholar

Hagendahl, H. (1967) Augustine and the Latin Classics (2 vols). Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Haight, A. L. (ed.) (1965) Hroswitha of Gandersheim – Her Life, Times, and Works, and a Comprehensive Bibliography. New York.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (2002) ‘The Singing Actors of Antiquity’ in Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.) Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge: 3–38.Google Scholar

Hallett, J. P. (1993) ‘Plautine Ingredients in the Performance of the Pseudolus’, Classical World 87: 21–6.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2008) Greek Laughter: A Study of Cultural Psychology from Homer to Early Christianity. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halporn, J. (1993) ‘Roman Comedy and Greek Models’ in Scodel, R. (ed.)Theatre and Society in the Classical World. Ann Arbor: 191–213.Google Scholar

Hammer, D. (2009) ‘What is Politics in the Ancient World?’ in Balot, R. K. (ed.) A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Malden, MA: 20–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammond, M., Mack, A. M., and Moskalew, W. (eds.) (1963) Plautus, Miles Gloriosus. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Handley, E. W. (1968) Menander and Plautus. A Study in Comparison. London.Google Scholar

Handley, E. W. (1997) ‘Menander, Dis Exapaton’ in The Oxyrhynchus Papyri 64: 14–42.Google Scholar

Handley, E. W. (2001) ‘Actoris opera: Words, Action and Acting in Dis Exapaton and Bacchides’ in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) Lecturae Plautinae Sarsinates IV: Bacchides. Urbino: 13–36.Google Scholar

Handley, E. W. (2002a) ‘Acting, Action and Words in New Comedy’ in Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.) Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge and New York: 165–88.Google Scholar

Handley, E. W. (2002b) ‘Theme and Variations. A Comparative Study in Plautine Comedy’ in Questa, C. and Raffaelli, R. (eds.) Due seminari plautini. La tradizione del testo. I modelli. Urbino: 105–20.Google Scholar

Handley, E. W. (2011) ‘The Rediscovery of Menander’ in Obbink, D. and Rutherford, R. (eds.) Culture in Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons. Oxford: 138–59.Google Scholar

Hanson, J. A. (1959) ‘Plautus as a Source Book for Roman Religion’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 90: 48–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanson, J. A. (1965) ‘The Glorious Military’ in Dorey, T. A. and Dudley, D. R. (eds.) Roman Drama. London: 51–85.Google Scholar

Happ, H. (1967) ‘Die lateinische Umgangssprache und die Kunstsprache des Plautus’, Glotta 45: 60–104.Google Scholar

Hardin, R. F. (2007) ‘Encountering Plautus in the Renaissance: A Humanist Debate on Comedy’, Renaissance Quarterly 60.3: 789–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy, C. S. (2005) ‘The Parasite’s Daughter: Metatheatrical Costuming in Plautus’ Persa’, Classical World 99: 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harries, B. (2007) ‘Acting the Part: Techniques of the Comic Stage in Cicero’s Early Speeches’ in Booth, J. (ed.) Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond. Swansea: 129–47.Google Scholar

Harris, J. (1987) ‘“Thieves, Harlots and Stinking Goats”: Fashionable Dress and Aesthetic Attitudes in Romanesque Art’, Costume 21: 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, A. R. W. (1968) The Law of Athens I. The Family and Property. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrsen, M. (1965) ‘The Manuscripts’ in Haight, A. L. (ed.) Hroswitha of Gandersheim. New York: 42–53.Google Scholar

Harsh, P. W. (1940) ‘The Position of Archaic Forms in the Verse of Plautus’, Classical Philology 35: 126–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartkamp, R. F. (2004) Von ‘leno’ zu ‘ruffiano’: die Darstellung, Entwicklung und Funktion der Figur des Kupplers in der römischen Palliata und in der italienischen Renaissancekomödie. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Harvey, P. B. (1986) ‘Historical Topicality in Plautus’, The Classical Word 79: 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haury, A. (1976) ‘Une “Année de la femme” à Rome, 195 avant J.-C.?’, L’Italie préromaine et la Rome républicaine. Paris: 427–36.Google Scholar

Hellegouarc’h, J. (1963) Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la République. Paris.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1999) ‘Entertaining Arguments: Terence, Adelphoe’ in Henderson, J. (ed.) Writing Down Rome. Satire, Comedy, and Other Offences in Latin Poetry. Oxford: 38–68.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2004) ‘Terence’s Selbstaussöhnung: Payback Time of the Self (Heautontimorumenus)’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Rethinking Terence. Ramus 33: 53–81.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2006) (ed.) Plautus: The One about the Asses. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2009) (ed.) A Plautus Reader: Selections from Eleven Plays. Mundelein, IL.Google Scholar

Henry, M. M. (1985) Menander’s Courtesans and the Greek Comic Tradition. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Hermand, L. (2011) ‘Homo sum: l’usage cicéronien des maximes de Térence’ in Mauduit, Ch. and Paré-Rey, P. (eds.) Les Maximes théâtrales en Grèce et à Rome: transferts, réécritures, remplois. Lyon: 295–304.Google Scholar

Herrick, M. T. (1950) Comic Theory in the Sixteenth Century. Urbana, IL.Google Scholar

Herrick, M. T. (1960) Italian Comedy in the Renaissance. Urbana, IL.Google Scholar

Herrmann, M. (1893) ‘Terenz in Deutschland bis zum Ausgang des 16. Jahrhunderts’, Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für deutsche Erziehungs- und Schulgeschichte 3: 1–28.Google Scholar

Herzog, R. (ed.) (1989) Restauration und Erneuerung. Die lateinische Literatur von 284 bis 374 n. Chr. Munich.Google Scholar

Heywood, T. (1874) The Dramatic Works of Thomas Heywood, ed. Shepherd, R. H. (6 vols). London.Google Scholar

Heywood, T. (1921) The Captives, or The Lost Recovered, ed. Judson, A. C.. New Haven.Google Scholar

Heywood, T. (1996) Three Marriage Plays, ed. Merchant, P.. Manchester.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hindsholm, S. C. (1990) Plautus’ verden: økonomiske og sociale relationer i komedierne. Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Z. (1980–1) ‘Gebetsparodien in Plautus’ Komödien’, Helikon 20–1:207–18.Google Scholar

Hofmann, J. B. (1951) Lateinische Umgangssprache. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Hofmann, J. B. and Szantyr, A. (1965) Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich.Google Scholar

Hofmann, W. (1995) ‘Die Körpersprache der Schauspieler als Mittel des Komischen bei Plautus’ in Benz, L., Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels. Tübingen: 205–18.Google Scholar

Hokenson, J. (2006) The Idea of Comedy: History, Theory, Critique. Madison, NJ.Google Scholar

Holford-Strevens, L. (2003) Aulus Gellius. An Antonine Scholar and his Achievement. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollis, A. S. (1994) ‘Rights of Way in Ovid (Heroides 20.146) and Plautus (Curculio 36)’, Classical Quarterly 44: 545–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Homeyer, H. (1968) ‘“Imitatio” and “aemulatio” im Werk der Hrotsvitha von Gandersheim’, Studi Medievali 9, 966–79.Google Scholar

Hordern, J. H. (2004) Sophron’s Mimes. Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hornby, R. (1986) Drama, Metadrama, and Perception. Lewisburg, PA.Google Scholar

Hosley, R. (1967) ‘The Formal Influence of Plautus and Terence’ in Brown, J. R. and Harris, B. (ed.) Elizabethan Theatre. New York: 130–45.Google Scholar

Höttemann, B. (1993) ‘Phlyakenposse und Atellane’ in Vogt-Spira, G. (ed.) Beiträge zur mündlichen Kultur der Römer. Tübingen: 89–112.Google Scholar

Hough, J. N. (1947) ‘Terence’s Use of Greek Words’, The Classical World 41: 18–21.Google Scholar

Hough, J. N. (1970) ‘Rapid Repartee in Roman Comedy’, Classical Journal 65: 162–7.Google Scholar

Hunink, V. (2006) ‘Review of Richlin, A. (2005)’, Rome and the Mysterious Orient: Three Plays by Plautus, translated with introductions and notes. Berkeley, Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 2006.05.35. Accessed on 18 September 2017 at: http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2006/2006-05-35.htmlGoogle Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1980) ‘Philemon, Plautus, and the Trinummus’, Museum Helveticum 37: 216–30.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1981) ‘The Aulularia of Plautus and its Greek Original’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 27: 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1985) The New Comedy of Greece and Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, R. L (1987) ‘Middle Comedy and the Amphitruo of Plautus’, Dioniso 57: 281–98.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2002) ‘Acting Down: the Ideology of Hellenistic Performance’ in Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds.) Greek and Roman Actors. Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge: 189–206.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2006) The Shadow of Callimachus. Studies in the Reception of Poetry at Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2009) Critical Moments in Classical Literature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutcheon, L. (2006) A Theory of Adaptation. New York and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jachmann, G. (1924) Die Geschichte des Terenztextes im Altertum. Basle.Google Scholar

Jachmann, G. (1931) Plautinisches und Attisches. Berlin.Google Scholar

Jacques, J.-M. (2004) ‘Le Disexapaton de Ménandre, modèle des Bacchides de Plaute’, Revue des études anciennes 106: 23–47.Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. (1945) Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture (3 vols), transl. Gilbert Highet. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jakobi, R. (1996) Die Kunst der Exegese im Terenzkommentar des Donat. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, S. L. (1998a) ‘Introduction: Constructions of Gender and Genre in Roman Comedy and Elegy’, Helios 25: 3–16.Google Scholar

James, S. L. (1998b) ‘From Boys to Men: Rape and Developing Masculinity in Terence’s Hecyra and Eunuchus’, Helios 25: 31–47.Google Scholar

James, S. L. (2005) ‘Effeminate Elegy, Comic Women and the Gender of Language: Recovering a Female Voice in Latin’, paper for the January 2005 APA Seminar ‘The Gender of Latin’. Boston.Google Scholar

James, S. L. (2010) ‘Trafficking Pasicompsa: A Courtesan’s Travels and Travails in Plautus’ Mercator’, New England Classical Journal 37: 39–50.Google Scholar

James, S. L. (2013) ‘Gender and Sexuality in Terence’, in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA: 175–94.Google Scholar

Janan, M. (1994) When the Lamp is Shattered: Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Carbondale, IL.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (1984) Aristotle on Comedy: Towards a Reconstruction of Poetics II. London.Google Scholar

Jeffery, B. (1969) French Renaissance Comedy, 1552–1630. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jenkins, T. E. (2005) ‘At Play with Writing: Letters and Readers in Plautus’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 135: 359–92.Google Scholar

Jennings, M. (1998) ‘“Like Shining from Shook Foil”: Liturgical Typology in Hrotsvit’s Legends and Dramas’, Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 33: 37–52.Google Scholar

Jenson, J. (1997) ‘Aulus Gellius als Literaturkritiker: Impressionist oder Systematiker? Versuch einer Aufstellung seiner literaturkritischen Werttypologie’, Classica et Mediaevalia 48: 359–88.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1967) The Tragedies of Ennius: The Fragments. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1969) ‘The Poet Cn. Naevius, P. Cornelius Scipio and Q. Caecilius Metellus’, Antichthon 3: 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1973) ‘Homo sum: humani nil a me alienum puto (Terence, Heauton timorumenos 77)’, Antichthon 7: 14–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1995) ‘Horace and the Reputation of Plautus in the Late First Century BC’ in Harrison, S. J. (ed.) Homage to Horace. A Bimillenary Celebration. Oxford: 228–47.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (2000) ‘The Unpretty Boy of Plautus’ Pseudolus (767–789)’ in Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds.) Dramatische Wäldchen. Hildesheim, Zurich, and New York: 431–60.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. R. (1968) ‘Micio and the Perils of Perfection’, CSCA 1: 171–86.Google Scholar

Johnson Chase, W. (1922) The Distichs of Cato, A Famous Medieval Textbook. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Jolowicz, H. F., and Nicholas, B. (3rd edn 1972) Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jones, L. W., and Morey, C. R. (1930–1) The Miniatures of the Manuscripts of Terence prior to the Thirteenth Century (2 vols). Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Jonson, B. (2012) Works, eds. Bevington, D., Butler, M. and Donaldson, I. (7 vols). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jory, E. J. (1963) ‘“Algebraic” Notation in Dramatic Texts’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 10: 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jürgens, H. (1972) Pompa diaboli. Die lateinischen Kirchenväter und das antike Theater. Stuttgart, Berlin, Cologne and Mainz.Google Scholar

Kaiser, W. (2015) ‘Justinian and the Corpus Iuris Civilis’ in Johnston, D. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law. Cambridge: 119–48.Google Scholar

Karabélias, E. (1970) ‘Une nouvelle source pour l’étude du droit attique: Le “Bouclier” de Ménandre (P. Bodmer XXVI)’, Revue internationale de droit français et étranger 48: 357–89.Google Scholar

Karabélias, E. (2002) L’ épiclérat attique: Recherches sur la condition juridique de la fille épiclère athénienne. Athens.Google Scholar

Karabélias, E. (2004) Recherches sur la condition juridique et sociale de la fille unique dans le monde grec ancien excepté Athènes. Athens.Google Scholar

Karakasis, E. (2003) ‘Legal Language in Plautus with Special Reference to “Trinummus”’, Mnemosyne 56: 194–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karakasis, E. (2005) Terence and the Language of Roman Comedy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karakasis, E. (2014) ‘The Language of the Palliata’ in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford and New York: 555–79.Google Scholar

Kaser, M. (2nd edn 1971) Das Römische Privatrecht. Erster Abschnitt. Das altrömische, das vorklassische und klassische Recht. Munich.Google Scholar

Katsouris, A. G. (1975) Linguistic and Stylistic Characterisation: Tragedy and Menander. Ioannina.Google Scholar

Kauer, R., and Lindsay, W. M. (1926) Comoediae: Andria, Heauton Timorumenos, Eunuchus, Phormio, Hecyra, Adelphoe. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kauer, R., and Lindsay, W. M. (1958 and 1961) P. Terenti Afri Comoediae. Oxford. (Reprint of 1926 edn with additions by Skutsch, O..)Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1969) ‘Ovid and the Law’, Yale Classical Studies 21: 243–63.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (ed.) (1982) The Cambridge History of Classical Literature II: Latin Literature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kes, B. R. (1988) Die Rezeption der Komödien des Plautus und Terenz im 19. Jahrhundert: Theorie – Bearbeitung – Bühne. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Killeen, J. F. (1973) ‘Plautus Miles Gloriosus 211’, Classical Philology 68: 53–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleve, K. (1996) ‘How to Read an Illegible Papyrus. Towards an Edition of PHerc. 78, Caecilius Statius, Obolostates sive Faenerator’, Cronache Ercolanesi 26: 5–14.Google Scholar

Knapp, C. (1907) ‘Travels in Ancient Times as Seen in Plautus and Terence’, Classical Philology 2: 1–24 and 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knecht, T. (1986) ‘Das römische Sprichwort – Abgrenzungen, Formen, Anwendung’ in Neukam, P. (ed.) Reflexionen antiker Kulturen. Munich: 47–59.Google Scholar

Knorr, O. (1995) ‘The Character of Bacchis in Heautontimoroumenos’, American Journal of Philology 116.2: 221–35.Google Scholar

Knorr, O. (2007) ‘Metatheatrical Humor in the Comedies of Terence’ in Kruschwitz, P., Ehlers, W. W., and Felgentreu, F. (eds.) Terentius Poeta. Munich: 167–74.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1983) Roman Comedy. Ithaca, NY and London.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1986) ‘Love in Terence’s Eunuch: The Origins of Erotic Subjectivity’, American Journal of Philology 107.3: 369–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Konstan, D. (1995) Greek Comedy and Ideology. New York and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar