Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:03:42.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Should we partake in Adam Oliver's taste for desert?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2022

Albert Weale*
Affiliation:
Political Theory and Public Policy, School of Public Policy, University College London, London, UK

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Response
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barr, N. (2001), The welfare state as piggy bank: Information, risk, uncertainty and the role of the state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, B. (1965), Political argument. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. and Nagel, T (2009), ‘Introduction’, in Rawls, J. (ed.), A brief inquiry into the meaning of sin and faith, with “On my religion”, edited Thomas Nagel, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 123.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1976), Law, legislation and liberty, volume 1I: The mirage of social justice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. (2019), The theology of liberalism: Political philosophy and the justice of god. Cambridge & London: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, A. (2021), ‘Sir John Stuffgut's soup and a taste for desert’, Behavioural Public Policy, 19. doi:10.1017/bpp.2021.24.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999), A theory of justice, 2nd Revised Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (2001), Justice as fairness: A restatement, in Kelly, E. (ed.), Cambridge: The Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (2009), A brief inquiry into the meaning of sin and faith, with “On my religion”, in Nagel (ed.), T., Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, H. (1907), The Methods of Ethics, Reprint 1981, with Foreword by John Rawls. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Weale, A. (2020a), Modern social contract theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weale, A. (2020b), ‘Meaning and context in political theory’, European Journal of Political Theory. doi:10.1177%2F1474885120925375.Google Scholar
Webb, S. and Webb, B. (1909a), ‘Break up the poor law and abolish the workhouse’: Being Part I of the minority report of the poor law commission. London: Fabian Society. Retrieved from: https://wellcomecollection.org/works/v9d4nm5r (accessed on November 24, 2021).Google Scholar
Webb, S. and Webb, B. (1909b), The minority report of the poor law commission: Part II the unemployed. London: Fabian Society. Retrieved from: https://wellcomecollection.org/works/qyhjfw7n (accessed on November 24, 2021).Google Scholar