Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T21:23:56.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bypass language en route to meaning at your peril

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2023

Lindsay N. Harris Open the ORCID record for Lindsay N. Harris [Opens in a new window] ,
Charles A. Perfetti Open the ORCID record for Charles A. Perfetti [Opens in a new window]  and
Elizabeth A. Hirshorn Open the ORCID record for Elizabeth A. Hirshorn [Opens in a new window]
Lindsay N. Harris
Affiliation:
Department of Leadership, Educational Psychology, and Foundations, Center for the Interdisciplinary Study of Language and Literacy, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA lharris3@niu.edu https://www.cedu.niu.edu/lepf/about/faculty/Lindsay-Harris.shtml
Charles A. Perfetti
Affiliation:
Learning Research and Development Center, Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA perfetti@pitt.edu https://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/people/researcher-detail.cshtml?id=308
Elizabeth A. Hirshorn
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at New Paltz, New Paltz, NY, USA hirshore@newpaltz.edu https://webapps.newpaltz.edu/directory/profile/elizabethhirshorn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The learning account of the puzzle of ideography cannot be dismissed as readily as Morin maintains, and is compatible with the standardization account. The reading difficulties of deaf and dyslexic individuals, who cannot easily form connections between written letter strings and spoken words, suggest limits to our ability to bypass speech and reliably access meaning directly from graphic symbols.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e245
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hickok, G. (2014). The myth of mirror neurons: The real neuroscience of communication and cognition. WW Norton.Google Scholar
Hirshorn, E. A., & Harris, L. N. (2022). Culture is not destiny, for reading: Highlighting variable routes to literacy within writing systems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1513(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lederberg, A. R., Schick, B., & Spencer, P. E. (2013). Language and literacy development of deaf and hard-of-hearing children: Successes and challenges. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029558CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Harris, L. N. (2013). Universal reading processes are modulated by language and writing system. Language Learning and Development, 9(4), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2013.813828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Harris, L. N. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in English. In Verhoeven, L., Perfetti, C. A., & Pugh, K. (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 25–49). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, A., Araújo, S., Morais, I. S., & Faísca, L. (2020). Reading and reading-related skills in adults with dyslexia from different orthographic systems: A review and meta-analysis. Annals of Dyslexia, 70(3), 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00205-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed