Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:34:31.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Functional specialization does not require a one-to-one mapping between brain regions and emotions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2012

Andrea Scarantino
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302. ascarantino@gsu.eduhttps://sites.google.com/site/andreascarantinoswebsite/

Abstract

Lindquist et al. have assumed that functional specialization requires a one-to-one mapping between brain regions and discrete emotions. This assumption is in tension with the fact that regions can have multiple functions in the context of different, possibly distributed, networks. Once we open the door to other forms of functional specialization, neuroimaging data no longer favor constructionist models over natural kind models.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, M. L. (2007) The massive redeployment hypothesis and the functional topography of the brain. Philosophical Psychology 20(2):143–74.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. (2005) Feeling is perceiving: Core affect and conceptualization in the experience of emotion. In: Emotions: Conscious and unconscious, ed. Barrett, L. F., Niedenthal, P. M. & Winkielman, P., pp. 255–84. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. (2006a) Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science 1(1):2858. Available at: http://www.bc.edu/sites/asi/publications/lfb/Barrett2006kinds.pdf.Google Scholar
Mundale, J. (2002) Concepts of localization: Balkanization in the brain. Brain and Mind 3:313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pessoa, L. (2008) On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9(2):148–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarantino, A. (in press) How to define emotions scientifically. Emotion Review.Google Scholar