Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T20:56:12.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Putting social cognitive mechanisms back into cumulative technological culture: Social interactions serve as a mechanism for children's early knowledge acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2020

Amanda S. Haber
Affiliation:
Boston University, Wheelock College of Education and Human Development, Boston, MA02215. haber317@bu.edukcorriv@bu.edu
Kathleen H. Corriveau
Affiliation:
Boston University, Wheelock College of Education and Human Development, Boston, MA02215. haber317@bu.edukcorriv@bu.edu

Abstract

Osiurak and Reynaud offer a unified cognitive approach to cumulative technological culture, arguing that it begins with non-social cognitive skills that allow humans to learn and develop new technical information. Drawing on research focusing on how children acquire knowledge through interactions others, we argue that social learning is essential for humans to acquire technical information.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brooks, R. & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015) Connecting the dots from infancy to childhood: A longitudinal study connecting gaze following, language, and explicit theory of mind. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 130:6778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, L. P., Ronfard, S. & Corriveau, K. H., eds. (2020) The questioning child: Insights from psychology and education. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, G. (2003) Pointing is the royal road to language for babies. In: Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet, ed. S. Kita, pp. 933. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Callanan, M. A. & Oakes, L. M. (1992) Preschoolers questions and parents’ explanations: Causal thinking in everyday activity. Cognitive Development 7(2):213–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callanan, M. A. & Jipson, J. L. (2001). Explanatory conversations and young children's developing scientific literacy. In: Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings, eds. Crowley, K., Schunn, C. D. & Okada, T., pp. 2149, Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Chouinard, M. M. (2007) Children's questions: A mechanism for cognitive development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 72(1):1112.Google ScholarPubMed
Corriveau, K. H., Min, G., Chin, J. & Doan, S. (2016) Do as I do, not as I say: Children's learning of self-regulatory strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 143:179–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, K., Callanan, M., Jipson, J. L., Galco, J., Topping, K. & Shrager, J. (2001a) Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent–child activity. Science Education 85(6):712–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R. & Allen, E. (2001b) Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science 12(3):258–61. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, K. & Siegler, R. S. (1999) Explanation and generalization in young children's strategy learning. Child Development 70(2):304–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frazier, B. N., Gelman, S. A. & Wellman, H. M. (2009) Preschoolers’ search for explanatory information within adult–child conversation. Child Development 80(6):1592–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haden, C. A. (2010) Talking about science in museums. Child Development 4(1):6267.Google Scholar
Hanner, E., Braham, E. J., Elliott, L. & Libertus, M. E. (2019) Promoting math talk in adult–child interactions through grocery store signs. Mind, Brain, and Education 13(2):110–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. L. (2012) Trusting what you're told: How children learn from others. The Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. L. & Corriveau, K. H. (2014) Learning from testimony about religion and science. In: Trust and skepticism: Children's selective learning from testimony, eds. Einav, S. & Robinson, E., pp. 2841. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. & Koenig, M. (2006) Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development 77(3):505–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00886.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, P. L., Koenig, M. A., Corriveau, K. H. & Jaswal, V. K. (2018) Cognitive foundations of learning from testimony. Annual Review of Psychology 69:251–73. Available at doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jipson, J. L., Gülgöz, S. & Gelman, S. A. (2016) Parent–child conversations regarding the ontological status of a robotic dog. Cognitive Development 39:2135. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurkul, K., Castine, E., Leech, K. & Corriveau, K. H.(under revised review) ‘How does a switch work?’ The role of mechanistic language in children's learning from parents. Submitted to Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology.Google Scholar
Kurkul, K. E. & Corriveau, K. H. (2018) Question, explanation, follow-up: A mechanism for learning from others? Child Development 89(1):280–94. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leech, K. A., Haber, A. S., Jalkh, Y. & Corriveau, K. H. (in press) Embedding explanations into storybooks impacts children's scientific discourse and learning. Frontiers in Psychology 11:1016. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, S. C., Suriyakham, L. W., Rowe, M. L., Huttenlocher, J. & Gunderson, E. A. (2010) What counts in the development of young children's number knowledge? Developmental Psychology 46(5):1309–19. Available at: doi: 10.1037/a0019671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lombrozo, T., Bonawitz, E. B. & Scalise, N. R. (2018) Young children's learning and generalization of teleological and mechanistic explanations. Journal of Cognition and Development 19(2):220–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2018.1427099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramani, G. B., Rowe, M. L., Eason, S. H. & Leech, K. A. (2015) Math talk during informal learning activities in head start families. Cognitive Development 35:1533. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronfard, S., Zambrana, I. M., Hermansen, T. K. & Kelemen, D. (2018) Question-asking in childhood: A review of the literature and a framework for understanding its development. Developmental Review 49:101–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabors, P. O., Roach, K. A. & Snow, C. E. (2001) Home language and literacy environment: Final results. In: Beginning literacy with language: Young children learning at home and school, eds. Dickinson, D. K. & Tabors, P. O., pp. 111–38. Paul H Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, N. & Lombrozo, T. (2018) When and how children use explanations to guide generalizations. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, eds. Rogers, T. T., Rau, M., Zhu, X. & Kalish, C. W., pp. 2069–614. Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Willard, A. K., Busch, J. T. A., Cullum, K. A., Letourneau, S. M., Sobel, D. M., Callanan, M. & Legare, C. H. (2019) Explain this, explore that: A study of parent–child interaction in a children's museum. Child Development 90(5):e598e617. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar