Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T02:16:57.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ediacaran diversity in space and time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

Tara Selly*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA 65211 ,
James D. Schiffbauer
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA 65211 ,
Marc Laflamme
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Physical Sciences, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 1C6
Lucas V. Warren
Affiliation:
Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil 01049-010
Alexander G. Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.

Extract

The Ediacaran Subcommission of the International Commission on Stratigraphy is diligently working toward the goal of subdividing the Ediacaran Period into precise and useful chronostratigraphic units. As emphasized by Xiao and colleagues in 2016, one of the most effective tools in this endeavor will be the use of index fossils. Our special issue serves as a presentation of ongoing research efforts aimed at advancing this task and contains explorations into taxonomy, taphonomy, and the diversity of life during the Ediacaran Period.

Type
Invited Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Paleontological Society

The Ediacaran Subcommission of the International Commission on Stratigraphy is diligently working toward the goal of subdividing the Ediacaran Period into precise and useful chronostratigraphic units. As emphasized by Xiao and colleagues in Reference Xiao, Narbonne, Zhou, Laflamme, Grazhdankin, Moczydlowska-Vidal and Cui2016, one of the most effective tools in this endeavor will be the use of index fossils. Our special issue serves as a presentation of ongoing research efforts aimed at advancing this task and contains explorations into taxonomy, taphonomy, and the diversity of life during the Ediacaran Period.

The fossils examined within this issue encompass the entire span of the Ediacaran Period, comprehensively represented by acritarchs from deposits from Brazil, China, and India; tubular fossils from Greenland and Mexico; and “vendobionts,” or classic Ediacara biota, from Australia and China.

The distinctiveness of acanthomorphic acritarchs has long established them as valuable index fossils for stratigraphic correlation, and this is particularly true within the lower–middle Ediacaran System (Xiao et al., Reference Xiao, Narbonne, Zhou, Laflamme, Grazhdankin, Moczydlowska-Vidal and Cui2016). Herein, the Krol A Formation (northern India) microfossil assemblage is detailed, including the description of two novel species, Cavaspina tiwariae n. sp. and Dictyotidium grazhdankinii n. sp. Many of the taxa reported are also present in the Doushantuo Formation (South China), bolstering correlation with the earliest Doushantuo biozone (the Appendisphaera grandis–Weissiella grandistella–Tianzhushania spinosa Assemblage Zone) and expanding into the third biozone in the lower Doushantuo Formation when integrated with δ13C chemostratigraphic data (Xiao et al., Reference Xiao, Jiang, Ye, Ouyang, Banerjee, Singh, Muscente, Zhou and Hughes2022). Notably, this work on the Krol A addresses critical assemblage gaps from lacking lithologies in South China, enabling the inter-basinal correlation of early Ediacaran strata between the Lesser Himalaya and the Yangtze Gorges regions. Previous investigations of the Doushantuo Formation have focused predominately on large acanthomorphic acritarchs, although new efforts considering smaller forms—those less than 200 μm in diameter—have identified seven biostratigraphically valuable species, five of which are reported for the first time from the Weng'an area (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Sun, Shang, Liu, Zhu and Yin2024). These smaller taxa not only facilitate enhanced correlations between the Doushantuo Formation of the Weng'an and Yangtze Gorges areas but may also be useful tools to validate proposed acritarch biozones in other Ediacaran localities, including Australia, Siberia, and the East European Platform. In addition, seven species of organic-walled microfossils are described for the first time from the Sete Lagoas Formation in the Januária area of Brazil, including the newly reported taxon Ghoshia januarensis n. sp. (Denezine et al., Reference Denezine, Do Carmo, Xiao, Tang, Sergeev, Mazoni and Zabini2024). When combined with detrital zircon ages and previously described tubular taxa, these newly reported microfossils indicate a terminal Ediacaran age for the Sete Lagoas Formation.

The mid-Ediacaran is exemplified not by its microfossils, but by the global appearance of the complex, macroscopic vendobionts. These organisms, often called the “classic Ediacara biota,” have been the subject of decades of study, yielding varied taxonomic assignments due to morphological variation and perhaps preservational influence, thereby hindering global correlation and underscoring the importance of taphonomic context. Here a reevaluation of elongate frond type materials from the Flinders Ranges reveals that taxonomic disparities stem from taphonomically induced morphological variation (Grimes et al., Reference Grimes, Narbonne, Gehling, Trusler and Dececchi2023). This work demonstrates that the studied arboreomorph specimens are conspecific and represent the full three-dimensional nature of the fossil frond across different preservational modes, designated herein as Akrophyllas n. gen. Further work from the Flinders Ranges reveals the new species Tribrachidium gehlingi n. sp. (Botha and García-Bellido, Reference Botha and García-Bellido2024), wherein the researchers demonstrate that this new species is found in the same beds as T. heraldicum Glaessner in Glaessner and Daily (Reference Glaessner and Daily1959) and shows statistically distinct morphological features. Moving into the late Ediacaran, a systematic report on Charnia from the Shibantan biota, Dengying Formation, South China, describes the new species Charnia gracilis n. sp. (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Pang, Chen, Wang, Zhou, Wan, Yuan and Xiao2022) and documents its potential two-stage growth model. Perhaps most important, this report expands both the paleogeographic and temporal ranges of the Charnia genus, as the first systematic description from the Shibantan biota and one of the youngest examples with the overlying Baimatuo Member having a recent radiometric date of ~543.4 ± 3.5 Ma.

Cloudinomorphs and other tubular forms have been identified as a primary tool for designating the terminal Ediacaran stage (e.g., Xiao et al., Reference Xiao, Narbonne, Zhou, Laflamme, Grazhdankin, Moczydlowska-Vidal and Cui2016; Selly et al., Reference Selly, Schiffbauer, Jacquet, Smith and Nelson2020). Modern analytical techniques have allowed for the reexamination of latest Ediacaran skeletal materials from the La Ciénega Formation, Mexico, yielding important new taxonomic, taphonomic, and paleoecological insights (Schiffbauer et al., Reference Schiffbauer, Wong, Davis, Selly, Nelson and Pruss2023). These materials, formerly assessed by McMenamin (Reference McMenamin1985) nearly 40 years ago, now reveal a polytaxic assemblage preserved through two distinct mineralization pathways and provide novel insights into original shell rigidity and potential predator–prey interactions. Continued research on these materials holds promise for establishing clearer biostratigraphic correlations with deposits in the southwestern United States and elucidating predatory behaviors previously observed only from comparable Chinese and tentatively Brazilian fossils. New tubular forms have been described from the Portfjeld Formation of North Greenland. Although the affinity of these phosphatized tubular microfossils is uncertain, Portfjeldia aestatis n. gen. n. sp. exhibits comparable morphology to that of the larger Ramitubus from the Weng'an biota of South China (Willman and Peel, Reference Willman and Peel2022).

The papers we have collected in this special issue provide a comprehensive overview that spans the entirety of the Ediacaran Period, not just in time but also in taxic groups from acritarchs and vendobionts to shelly tubes, and finally from globally distributed localities. This diverse body of research underscores the synergy of efforts needed to unveil the wealth of knowledge the Ediacaran Period still holds—including evolutionary dynamics, ecological interactions, and paleobiogeographic patterns—and reinforces the kinds of works needed to subdivide and facilitate global correlation of Ediacaran strata.

Acknowledgments

The guest editors sincerely thank all the authors for their valuable contributions to this special issue. We also express our sincere thanks to Journal of Paleontology managing editor, J. Kastigar, along with the entire editorial support team, for their help in bringing this volume to fruition. Thanks also to all the referees who made time in their schedules to provide insightful reviews of submitted manuscripts. We are also grateful to the Journal of Paleontology for accepting our original idea for publishing this special issue.

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare none.

References

Botha, T.L., and García-Bellido, D.C., 2024, A new species of the iconic triradial Ediacaran genus Tribrachidium, from Nilpena Ediacara National Park, Flinders Ranges (South Australia): Journal of Paleontology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denezine, M., Do Carmo, D.A., Xiao, S., Tang, Q., Sergeev, V., Mazoni, A.F., and Zabini, C., 2024, Organic-walled microfossils from the Ediacaran Sete Lagoas Formation, Bambuí Group, Southeast Brazil: taxonomic and biostratigraphic analyses: Journal of Paleontology, https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2023.83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaessner, M., and Daily, B., 1959, The geology and late Precambrian fauna of the Ediacaran fossil reserve: Records of the South Australian Museum, v. 13, p. 369401.Google Scholar
Grimes, K.F., Narbonne, G.M., Gehling, J.G., Trusler, P.W., and Dececchi, T.A., 2023, Elongate Ediacaran fronds from the Flinders Ranges, South Australia: Journal of Paleontology, https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2023.45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMenamin, M.A., 1985, Basal Cambrian small shelly fossils from the La Ciénega formation, northwestern Sonora, Mexico: Journal of Paleontology, v. 59, p. 14141425.Google Scholar
Schiffbauer, J.D., Wong, C., Davis, C., Selly, T., Nelson, L.L., and Pruss, S.B., 2023, Reassessing the diversity, affinity, and construction of terminal Ediacaran tubiform fossils from the La Ciénega Formation, Sonora, Mexico: Journal of Paleontology.Google Scholar
Selly, T., Schiffbauer, J.D., Jacquet, S.M., Smith, E.F., Nelson, L.L. et al., Y, 2020, A new cloudinid fossil assemblage from the terminal Ediacaran of Nevada, USA: Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 18, p. 357379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willman, S., and Peel, J.S., 2022, Problematic tubular fossils from the Portfjeld Formation (Ediacaran) of North Greenland: Journal of Paleontology, https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2022.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C., Pang, K., Chen, Z., Wang, X., Zhou, C., Wan, B., Yuan, X., and Xiao, S., 2022, The rangeomorph fossil Charnia from the Ediacaran Shibantan biota in the Yangtze Gorges area, South China: Journal of Paleontology, https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2022.97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., Sun, W., Shang, X., Liu, P., Zhu, M., and Yin, Z., 2024, New materials of acanthomorphic acritarchs from the Ediacaran Weng'an 2 Biota (South China): Journal of Paleontology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, S., Narbonne, G.M., Zhou, C., Laflamme, M., Grazhdankin, D.V., Moczydlowska-Vidal, M., and Cui, H., 2016, Towards an Ediacaran time scale: problems, protocols, and prospects: Episodes Journal of International Geoscience, v. 39, p. 540555.Google Scholar
Xiao, S., Jiang, G., Ye, Q., Ouyang, Q., Banerjee, D.M., Singh, B.P., Muscente, A.D., Zhou, C., and Hughes, N.C., 2022, Systematic paleontology, acritarch biostratigraphy, and δ13C chemostratigraphy of the early Ediacaran Krol A Formation, Lesser Himalaya, northern India: Journal of Paleontology, https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2022.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar