Forms

Here I focus on the vessels, rather than other objects used to prepare or consume drinks, and I focus particularly on form rather than design, because distinctive drinking vessel forms are more closely tied to defined communities than decoration (Dietler and Herbich Reference Dietler and Herbich1989:157). Worldwide, the earliest drinking vessels tend to have been made using natural materials, including gourds, calabashes, eggs, coconuts, shells, horns, wood, bone, skins, or skulls (Tedlock Reference Tedlock2002; Vencl Reference Vencl1994:316). Often, people replaced these with ceramics that mimicked these forms, called skeuomorphs (Blitz Reference Blitz2015; Holmes Reference Holmes1886:446; Houston Reference Houston2014), and then ceramics that elaborated these basic natural forms with decoration. In areas with metallurgy, metal forms replaced ceramics, or there might be both metal elite and ceramic nonelite versions of specific vessel forms (Joffe Reference Joffe1998:307; Sherratt Reference Sherratt, Goodman, Lovejoy and Sherratt1995:20).

Drinks could be served in containers large enough for group consumption, for instance, with straws (Joffe Reference Joffe1998), or in smaller individual serving vessels. Communal drinking from large vessels promotes solidarity and egalitarian sharing (Rabinowitz Reference Rabinowitz and Hodkinson2009:143) because shared vessels emphasize the equality of the drinkers. However, such equality may be an illusion, perhaps “to ward off challenges to the existing order” (Day and Wilson Reference Day, Wilson, Halstead and Barrett2004:55). In contrast, the use of individual drinking containers is associated with hierarchy and greater overt tensions within a community. Individual drinking containers permit personal elaboration (Heath Reference Heath2000:119), with the size of individual vessels often relating to age and status (for example, highest-status males drank from larger vessels, with increasingly smaller vessels associated with younger age and lower status [Heath Reference Heath2000:81]). It may be difficult to determine the number of participants from communal vessels, but with individual drinking vessels, more vessels may indicate more participants (Webb and Frankel Reference Webb, Frankel, Hitchcock, Laffineur and Crowley2008:293). The shift to individual serving vessels was often accompanied by a shift in the physical practice of drinking; individual vessels can be held by one hand and set on a surface where they are visible to other participants and associated with the drinker. The act of pouring may have become a greater focus of drinking practice, so that serving became more central (Day and Wilson Reference Day, Wilson, Halstead and Barrett2004:55).

Special drinks such as wine, beer, chocolate, coffee, and tea tend to have distinctive group-specific vessel forms. As the number of distinct drinks increases, each may have associated vessel forms, paraphernalia, etiquette, and ritualized behavior (Smith et al. Reference Smith, Wharton, Olson and Bray2003:247). For instance, wealthy Victorian place settings included up to 10 different shapes of stemware, as well as distinctive cups for coffee and tea. So not only drink-specific vessel forms but also the variety of vessel forms and associated drinks became important means of differentiation and hierarchy in sedentary societies (Hayden Reference Hayden, Barnett and Hoopes1995:261; Smith et al. Reference Smith, Wharton, Olson and Bray2003:247). The more elaborate the social hierarchy, the more elaborate the drinking vessel assemblage and the greater the use of decoration and precious materials to differentiate forms (Anderson Reference Anderson, Jennings and Bowser2009). For archaeologists, then, an increase in the number of distinct drinking vessel forms is an indication of intensified drinking activity, particularly drinking in groups, and likely indicates varied recipes or rituals as well (Anderson Reference Anderson, Jennings and Bowser2009; Joyce and Henderson Reference Joyce, Henderson, Staller and Carrasco2010:158; Smith et al. Reference Smith, Wharton, Olson and Bray2003). In complex societies, the number of distinct drinking vessel forms may decrease when they are produced by specialists (Hamilakis Reference Hamilakis1999:48–49).

While variety in vessel forms may relate to different social classes and drinks, and while distinct vessel forms mirror social distinctions (Mullins Reference Mullins2011:140), change in vessel form may relate to changes in religious practices, trade contacts, beverages, etiquette, or elite status markers (Arnold Reference Arnold1999:73; Powis et al. Reference Powis, Valdez, Hester, Hurst and Tarka2002). Furthermore, “every period and culture displaying a rapid morphological development of drinking vessels also accentuates the social functions of drinking” (Vencl Reference Vencl1994:317). New vessel shapes often point to changes in drinking practices connected with the development of new sociopolitical institutions and ideologies (Anderson Reference Anderson, Jennings and Bowser2009; Joffe Reference Joffe1998:306; Joyce and Henderson Reference Joyce, Henderson, Staller and Carrasco2010:160), emphasizing the connection among drinking practices, ideology, and craft production. In Bolivia, drinking vessels and the associated rituals helped promote rapid social transformation (Anderson Reference Anderson, Jennings and Bowser2009:192). Indeed, because drinks require paraphernalia, drinking practices always impacted crafting (Berg Reference Berg2007) or exchange. Authentic or emulated exotic drinking vessels may differentiate elite drinking even when the exotic drink itself was scarce (Dietler Reference Dietler1990:386). Thus, the vessel might come to symbolize the drink, regardless of the presence of the concoction. Opaque drinking forms may mask the quantity of drink, so that viewers believe there is more than there actually is. Restricted drink supplies often lead men to limit women's consumption (Bacon Reference Bacon, Bourne and Fox1973:190) and ultimately to enact sumptuary laws or taboos. When drink is scarce, control over drinking is high (Douglas Reference Douglas and Douglas1987).

Uses

Cross-cultural patterns show that most societies have drinks specifically associated with religious rituals and drinks associated with secular rituals, including feasts (Bacon, Barry, and Child Reference Bacon, Barry and Child1965; Bacon, Barry, Child, and Snyder Reference Bacon, Barry, Child and Snyder1965; Child et al. Reference Child, Bacon and Barry1965). Medicinal drinks are common as well. Worldwide, events frequently associated with drinking include rites of passage, thanksgiving offerings relating to crops and the harvest, house construction, work parties, dedications to gods or ancestors, elections of chiefs or transitions of leaders, and prestige feasts (Child et al. Reference Child, Bacon and Barry1965; Hayden Reference Hayden, Dietler and Hayden2001; Tedlock Reference Tedlock2002). Most ritual drinking activity outside of religious ritual or medicine is collective and often associated with the need to mobilize labor for community works. Ritual consumption may be apparent in structured or ceremonial deposits of drinking vessels (Hamilakis Reference Hamilakis1999:48). Finally, drinking vessels are common funerary items (for the deceased to use in the afterlife, for use as part of the funeral, or for use by mourners).

Social Impact

Drinking occasions may help maintain social cohesion or offer an outlet for competition (Day and Wilson Reference Day, Wilson, Halstead and Barrett2004:59), providing an “avenue to the creation of prestige and social capital” (Dietler Reference Dietler2006:237) by generating social indebtedness through hospitality, hosting ceremonies, or underwriting feasts. Gaining and maintaining prestige may depend on the ability to produce beverages or obtain beverage ingredients (Child et al. Reference Child, Bacon and Barry1965; Dietler Reference Dietler2006:237). Drinking is important to the construction and transformation of identities, as specific drinks and associated paraphernalia may reflect age, gender, class, lineage, religion, and regional or national identities (Dietler Reference Dietler2006:235). For example, among the Luo of Kenya,

Drinking rituals can thus involve highly standardized behaviors, including seating, placement of vessels, ways to hold vessels, and order of drinking (Bott Reference Bott and Douglas1987). Drinking etiquette involves authoritative information about correct behavior, with individuals having varied access to appropriate knowledge about manners, which are often performed in public and closely scrutinized by both outsiders and practitioners (Elias Reference Elias and Jephcott1994; Wright Reference Wright, Halstead and Barrett2004:90–91).

However, etiquette also provides a means for challenging power structures and delegitimizing authorities (Wright Reference Wright, Halstead and Barrett2004:90). The adoption of new forms of drink can weaken established power structures and escalate social competition in the society, and the adoption of foreign drinking customs and paraphernalia can symbolically differentiate groups within a society or create a symbolic link with the emulated group (Dietler Reference Dietler1990:376–377; see also Bunimovitz and Greenberg Reference Bunimovitz and Greenberg2004). Drinking customs may help institutionalize status differences within a group, promote solidarity, and serve as a means of mobilizing labor (Dietler Reference Dietler1990). But drinking parties are not always about solidarity, as they can “incorporate elements of exploitation, severe competition, masked coercion and violence and, subsequently, resistance” (Hamilakis Reference Hamilakis1999:49). A decline in factional competition may cause a decline in the need for feasts and drinking events, and drinking may become associated with an elite lifestyle and exclusivity instead (Hamilakis Reference Hamilakis1999:49; LeCount Reference LeCount1999). Colonizers often used drink as a tool for engaging the colonized, particularly in negotiations, though later interactions often involved forbidding the drink to the colonized (Heath Reference Heath2000:92). Disruption in access to drinks or drinking paraphernalia may lead to internal revolt (Arnold Reference Arnold1999:80). Brenda Bowser's (Reference Bowser2000) important ethnoarchaeological research in Ecuador emphasizes how even within the household, drinking activities can impact political alliances: guests paying formal or informal visits are served chicha in bowls with decorations that signify the household's political and factional allegiances.

Archaeological discussions of drinking focus largely on alcoholic beverages (Arnold Reference Arnold1999; Dietler Reference Dietler1990, Reference Dietler2006; Hamilakis Reference Hamilakis1999; Jennings et al. Reference Jennings, Antrobus, Atencio, Glavich, Johnson, Loffler and Luu2005; Joffe Reference Joffe1998; Smith Reference Smith2008). However, archaeologists have also examined the consumption of stimulant drinks as well, including coffee, tea, cacao, and the varieties of holly drinks found in North and South America (Coe and Coe Reference Coe and Coe2007; Joyce and Henderson Reference Joyce, Henderson, Staller and Carrasco2010; McNeil Reference McNeil2006; Merrill Reference Merrill and Hudson1979; Smith et al. Reference Smith, Wharton, Olson and Bray2003). While scholarship in the Southwest/Northwest and Mesoamerica has largely focused on the drinks themselves, some attention has also been paid to the drinking vessels and paraphernalia (Crown and Hurst Reference Crown and Hurst2009; Crown et al. Reference Crown, Gu, Jeffrey Hurst, Ward, Bravenec, Ali, Kebert, Berch, Redman, Lyons, Merewether, Phillips, Reed and Woodson2015; Joyce and Henderson Reference Joyce, Henderson, Staller and Carrasco2010; Mathiowetz Reference Mathiowetz2011; Powis et al. Reference Powis, Valdez, Hester, Hurst and Tarka2002; Putsavage Reference Putsavage2008). Recent research suggests that both cacao (Theobroma cacao) and holly (Ilex vomitoria) were imported drink ingredients in the Southwest/Northwest (Crown and Hurst Reference Crown and Hurst2009; Crown et al. Reference Crown, Gu, Jeffrey Hurst, Ward, Bravenec, Ali, Kebert, Berch, Redman, Lyons, Merewether, Phillips, Reed and Woodson2015; Washburn et al. Reference Washburn, Washburn and Shipkova2011, Reference Washburn, Washburn and Shipkova2013).

Ethnographic Evidence

Groups living today in the Southwest/Northwest provide a context for examining drinking practices in the past (Havard Reference Havard1896; La Barre Reference La Barre1938; Waddell Reference Waddell, Waddell and Everett1980), while recognizing that drinks, recipes, vessels, and associated practices likely changed over time. In their study of feasting and alcohol production and consumption among the Tohono O'odham of southern Arizona and the Rarámuri of southwestern Chihuahua, Merrill and Sprehn (Reference Merrill and Sprehn2002) found significant differences, notably in women's roles in preparing the beverages (women do not participate in fermenting saguaro wine, while only women prepare maize beer among the Rarámuri), in the extent of networks involved in preparing and consuming the beverages (extensive villages among the Tohono O'odham, only local communities among the Rarámuri), the purpose of drinking (for rain among the Tohono O'odham, for many purposes among the Rarámuri), and the symbolic meaning of the beverages (rain among the Tohono O'odham, and many meanings among the Rarámuri). Importantly, alcohol consumption among the Tohono O'odham is limited to a specific set of rituals held during a restricted part of the year (see also Waddell Reference Waddell, Waddell and Everett1980:8), while the Rarámuri consume alcohol in conjunction with work parties and fiestas throughout the year. Waddell argues for a similar contrast with Athabaskan groups in the Southwest/Northwest: that they used beverages to “engage social and kinship relations rather than to invoke rain for their fields” (1980:3). Driver (Reference Driver1969:110) argues for the utilization of fermented drinks among the Zuni, and perhaps the Keresan Pueblos prior to contact, with use restricted to social and secular occasions rather than farming ritual.

Whatever the status of alcoholic beverages among the Pueblos, there is no question that drinking was an important component of many Pueblo rituals. The Green Corn Dance included drinks brought from a distance and consumed by Koshare dancers for purification (Bandelier and Hewett Reference Bandelier and Hewett1937:50). Parsons (Reference Parsons1939:50) notes a number of rituals that entailed drinking, including the One Spring Time ceremony performed by kiva societies, which involved a mountain retreat and consumption of a drink made by mixing ground herbs with water imbibed from a gourd. She (1939:374, 377, 414, 587, 686–687, 689) describes several rituals involving liquids, sometimes medicines, placed in medicine bowls and then aspersed to all participants or administered by shell. A ceremony of purification at Cochiti involved a shaman giving participants water from a medicine bowl (Bunzel Reference Bunzel1932:531 n. 81). Ortiz describes a sweet drink of fermented grain consumed as part of the “bringing the buds to life” ceremony among the Eastern Pueblos (1969:99–100, 114), when the winter moiety transfers power to the summer moiety. The Zuni drank a number of concoctions, including a tea made from a plant of the mustard family and consumed only by members of the Galaxy Fraternity in ceremonial chambers (Stevenson Reference Stevenson1915:99). Drinks are consumed as part of rituals to bring rain or snow but also for purification (Waddell Reference Waddell, Waddell and Everett1980:24), as part of curing ceremonies and rites of passage (including for children; Ortiz Reference Ortiz1969:261).

Common Pueblo drinking containers described in these accounts include ceramic medicine bowls, gourd dippers, and shells (particularly abalone shells). Gourds and shells were likely traditional forms with a long history of use. The rituals include a leader, and some include ranking of who drinks, when, and out of what vessel (Parsons Reference Parsons1939:689). Some drinks are associated with specific sodalities and consumed in private, ceremonial locations.

After contact, the Spanish colonists of what is now New Mexico controlled access to cacao and used it as an important tool in gastropolitics. Mission supply trains brought chocolate and majolica drinking cups to the Spanish missions every three years, partly for use in their infirmaries (Snow Reference Snow, Wiseman, O'Laughlin and Snow2005) but also for serving native individuals of high rank. During the Pueblo Revolt, chocolate was one of the commodities taken from the Spanish and hidden by the Pueblos (Cabezon et al. Reference Cabezon, Barriga, Grivetti, Grivetti and Shapiro2009:428). Chocolate drinks were then used in negotiating with the Pueblos upon the Spanish reconquest in 1692 (Kessell and Hendricks Reference Kessell and Hendricks1992:407). The Spanish were likely following a long history of using drinks in sustaining social differentiation and conducting political negotiation.

Archaeological Evidence in Chaco

I turn now to evidence from Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, including the sequence of forms, quantity, and contexts of drinking vessels. I interpret specific forms as drinking vessels based on their physical attributes, analogies with traditional vessel use in portions of the Southwest/Northwest, and evidence of contents where available. There are no known images of drinking in rock art or kiva murals or on ceramics themselves (Kelley Hays-Gilpin, personal communication 2017). I also propose that these vessels were used at least sometimes for serving, mixing, pouring, and/or imbibing drinks in social settings, rather than primarily in private, making them visible to others. I employ the scholarship reviewed above to interpret the record of drinking forms, particularly that shared forms indicate a common tradition, while differences in form, color, and the presence of designs reflect identity negotiation. Where everyone shared the same basic form and vessels differ only in color or design, such negotiation likely involved the individual, but when segments of the larger population used distinctive forms, that negotiation shifted to the level of the group, suggesting competition (Berg Reference Berg2007:249). Evidence for the nature of the individuals or groups associated with particular vessel forms comes from discard contexts. Finally, based on worldwide patterning (Bacon Reference Bacon, Everett, Waddell and Heath1976; Bacon, Barry, Child, and Snyder Reference Bacon, Barry, Child and Snyder1965; Dietler Reference Dietler1990:364), men typically obtained the exotic ingredients for and consumed special drinks, while women typically prepared such special drinks, with their consumption (and that by children) of those drinks more open to question.

Drinking vessels in the Chaco area largely follow the worldwide patterns described above (Figure 1). The earliest Chaco drinking vessel forms were almost certainly gourds. While gourds do not preserve well, they are easily cultivated, and the form can be manipulated during growth to achieve specific shapes. Fragments of gourd canteens were recovered in Chaco (Judd Reference Judd1954:159). Unfortunately, we do not know whether gourds used for drinking were decorated (as calabashes used for drinking cacao were historically among the Maya [Tedlock Reference Tedlock2002:171] and gourds used for rattles were in Chaco [Judd Reference Judd1954:279]), or whether they remained important drinking vessels, so I focus on the vessels we know to have been used.

Figure 1. Forms of ceramic drinking vessels found in Chaco Canyon (figure drawn by Jill Jordan).

In the AD 500s, several of the earliest ceramic forms in Chaco may be skeuomorphs of gourd vessels, including decorated neckless jars, known as seed jars or tecomates, at least some of which were likely used for drinking, perhaps with straws. In Mesoamerica, Clark and Blake (Reference Clark, Blake, Brumfiel and Fox1994:25; see also Houston Reference Houston2014:65) indicate that the first ceramics (particularly tecomates dating to ca. 1900 BC) mimic gourd forms. They (1994:26) argue that producing the same form in ceramics enhanced the vessel's value without tampering with the social conventions of the form. Houston argues that these ceramic gourd skeuomorphs were adopted because they served as “socially marked contrasts with everyday receptacles of perishable materials” in community feasts (2014:66). He suggests that skeuomorphy is triggered at moments of change, in this case, new feasting activity. As to the acceptance of this innovation, Henrich (Reference Henrich, O'Brien and Shennan2010:103, 108) argues that it is the opportunity to imitate a successful or influential person who adopts an innovation that encourages acceptance of that innovation rather than cost-benefit analysis or mechanical performance characteristics. Whether the same holds true for Chaco is not known, but early tecomates could signal the initial use of ceramic drinking vessels to differentiate some individuals from those using gourds, perhaps also in the context of community feasts.

Chacoan potters began crafting ceramic vessels with the shape of entire gourds around AD 650 (Toll and McKenna Reference Toll, McKenna and Mathien1997). With their asymmetrical shape and small orifice, these gourd effigies required skill to create and were suitable for fewer uses than tecomates; they are not common in Chaco. No testing has been done to determine what liquids were consumed from them. There is nothing unusual about their discard; one was found with a burial in Chaco (Pepper Reference Pepper1920:Figure 47b). As with the tecomates, the use of ceramic gourd effigies suggests an effort by some individuals to differentiate themselves from people drinking from natural gourds. So at least by AD 650, drinking had become an arena for differentiation in Chaco Canyon.

Pitchers are the most common drinking vessel in Chaco Canyon. The name is somewhat of a misnomer; the vessels are closest to steins in shape and lack a pouring lip. The pitcher appears first in grayware ceramics (Toll and McKenna Reference Toll, McKenna and Mathien1997:55) and rarely with black paint designs probably around AD 650 (Lister and Lister Reference Lister and Lister1978:18–19). Decorated pitchers became increasingly common after AD 700 and remained in use into the AD 1100s (Toll and McKenna Reference Toll, McKenna and Mathien1997:Table 2.15), although the shape evolved over time. The later decorated forms have residue indicative of cacao or holly (Crown et al. Reference Crown, Gu, Jeffrey Hurst, Ward, Bravenec, Ali, Kebert, Berch, Redman, Lyons, Merewether, Phillips, Reed and Woodson2015); plainware forms are sometimes sooted and were probably used for cooking. By the AD 800s, the pitcher was likely the primary drinking vessel for individuals in Chaco. Novice potters made pitchers more than any other form, although bowls would have been easier to make (Crown Reference Crown, Roddick and Stahl2016a:80). While most pitchers found in Chaco are Cibola White Ware, a possibly local product, Chacoans also imported some pitchers, including redware; drinking from a redware pitcher would obviously differentiate an individual.

Archaeologists have recovered pitchers in varied contexts, including kivas, and pitchers were second only to bowls as mortuary ceramics, suggesting the importance of pitchers as personal objects and in mortuary ritual (Mills Reference Mills, Mills, Goestze and Zedeño1993:306). Analysis of Chaco mortuary data indicates that pitchers occur more often with adults than with children (Figure 2) and more often in Great House burials than in small site burials (Akins Reference Akins1986:94, 97) during the period from about AD 1030 to 1150. They are common burial accompaniments with both male and female adults throughout the sequence. In addition, Chacoans employed pitchers in two types of ceremonial or performative depositional practices in Pueblo Bonito. The first type involved the placement of groups of vessels directly in front of doors and on thresholds, probably as a symbolic barrier blocking passage through the door (Figure 3). For instance, 30 vessels blocked the threshold from Room 28 to the adjacent Room 51a on the Room 28 side. These vessels so thoroughly prevent easy passage that they must represent a type of closure for those doorways. Among the Pueblos ethnographically, outsiders were not allowed in rooms where sacred things were stored; at Zuni, for example, “if any one crosses the threshold he is ‘caught’ and must be initiated into the group” or whipped and forced to make payments (Bunzel Reference Bunzel1932:502). The vessels may have served as a warning that crossing the threshold into Room 28 was taboo. Although in a practical sense, passage was blocked by breakable/movable objects, Chacoans might have perceived the objects themselves as symbolic guardians of those passages. The second type of depositional practice involved termination or deanimation by smashing or burning vessels, which removed them from circulation, deactivated their power, and protected individuals from contact with them (Lucero Reference Lucero, Mills and Walker2008:192; Mills and Ferguson Reference Mills and Ferguson2008). Discard of groups of pitchers, some heavily burned, in some rooms in Pueblo Bonito (including 20 in Room 28 and 12 in Room 99 [Pepper Reference Pepper1920:312]) indicates deanimation of these vessels.

Figure 2. Frequency of ceramic drinking vessels and pitchers in burials in Chaco Canyon (data from Akins Reference Akins1986).

Figure 3. Some of the vessels in Pueblo Bonito Room 28 blocking the northeastern doorway to Room 51a as found in 1896; a second layer of vessels was located beneath this one (Image #411882 [HEE 107], courtesy of the American Museum of Natural History Library).

Potters began crafting Chacoan cylinder jars with Red Mesa Black-on-white designs that suggest manufacture in the AD 900s.Footnote ¹ Cylinder jars also have the residue of caffeinated plants interpreted as cacao or holly (Crown et al. Reference Crown, Gu, Jeffrey Hurst, Ward, Bravenec, Ali, Kebert, Berch, Redman, Lyons, Merewether, Phillips, Reed and Woodson2015). Early cylinder jars are large and wide (average orifice diameter of 15.1 cm).Footnote ² The three known Red Mesa Black-on-white jars lack provenience. However, they appear to be Cibola White Ware and could have come from Chaco Canyon. These vessels appear too large to have been personal drinking vessels and likely served as communal drinking/serving vessels, with individuals passing the vessel around the group (Hamilakis Reference Hamilakis, Hitchcock, Laffineur and Crowley2008:11) or receiving their portion from ladles, gourd cups, or shells or through straws. They would have required two hands to hold. In this manner, they differed from pitchers not only in shape but also in consumption patterns and the etiquette that governed their use. The low number of vessels suggests that drinking was an exclusive activity, perhaps associated with religious rituals; it may also indicate that the drink was scarce. As Douglas (Reference Douglas and Douglas1987:11) suggested, when drink is scarce, social control is high; in such settings, drinking rituals clarify social roles and strata. As noted above, the large size might have suggested abundance, but the opaque walls might have disguised the actual quantity of drink.

Beginning about AD 1030, when Gallup Black-on-white became the dominant decorative style, potters began crafting narrower cylinder jars that could be held in one hand (average orifice diameter of 9.8 cm; Figure 4). Some potters fashioned these in sets of two to four vessels with identical shapes and lug configurations but sometimes different designs (Figure 5). The ability of potters to create sets of identical forms indicates a level of standardization not recognized in other Chacoan ceramics (Toll Reference Toll, Duran and Kirkpatrick1990:284). Interestingly, sets of two to four vessels also characterize drinking patterns in prehispanic Bolivia, where drinking was part of social competition (Anderson Reference Anderson, Jennings and Bowser2009:186). In that area today, pairs of drinking cups are used in feasting events in which the host drinks from one cup and passes the other to each guest in turn (Anderson Reference Anderson, Jennings and Bowser2009:186). The pairing of vessels was also a part of drinking rituals in Late Bronze Age Mycenaean Greece (Stockhammer Reference Stockhammer2012:19; Wright Reference Wright, Halstead and Barrett2004), where the sets indicate “the emergence of standards of taste and a burgeoning demand for commodities . . . that could be used in displays of status” (Wright Reference Wright, Halstead and Barrett2004:99–100). Chacoan sets might have been used to froth the drinks, employing a method used by both the Maya and the Aztec (Coe and Coe Reference Coe and Coe2007:48, 86) that involved pouring the drink from a jar held at chest height into a jar set on the ground. If true, public preparation of the drinks may have become an important performative part of the ritual. Two double-cylinder jars (Post Reference Post1989) emphasize the importance of pairing/twinning for these vessels. Importantly, the shift to the use of drinking sets suggests the presence of a shared social etiquette surrounding the consumption of drinks, regardless of the specifics.

Figure 4. Changes in cylinder jar orifice diameters through time, showing the earliest (Red Mesa Black-on-white) vessels having the largest orifices and later types exhibiting smaller orifices.

Figure 5. Cylinder jar sets from Pueblo Bonito, not to scale. (a) Gallup Black-on-white vessels (from left to right): A336496, H3392 (height 20.8 cm); (b) Gallup Black-on-white vessels: 52053, H3400, H3253, H3237 (height 17.7 cm); (c) Profile and base with maker's marks of Cibola White Ware vessels: H3407, 52116, H3383, H3394 (height 26.4 cm). (A336496 courtesy of the Department of Anthropology, Smithsonian Institution; H3392, H3400, H3253, H3237, H3407, H3383, and H3394 courtesy of the Division of Anthropology, American Museum of Natural History; 52053 and 52116 courtesy of the National Museum of the American Indian, Smithsonian Institution. Figure created by Drew Wills.)

Based on visible aplastic inclusions, slip, paint composition, and designs, most eleventh-century cylinder jars appear to be Cibola White Ware, possibly made in Chaco Canyon. The cylinder jar is not a difficult form to create, although creating identical sets requires more skill. Yet the varied quality of the finished products indicates that production was not restricted to skilled potters. An instrumental neutron activation analysis of 12 cylinder jars showed compositional homogeneity, suggesting that they were all manufactured in the same area (Neitzel and Bishop Reference Neitzel and Bishop1990). There are intrusive cylinder jars as well: at least four decorated jars are Chuska White Ware from the Chuska Slope west of Chaco, four identical Showlow Red jars came from southwest of the canyon, and a Flagstaff Black-on-white jar and a Black Mesa Black-on-white jar came from north-central Arizona.

It is possible that potters produced a new set of vessels annually and retired old sets, so that only a few vessels were in use in any one year. Otherwise, the roughly 200 cylinder jars found in Chaco Canyon suggest large-scale consumption events. Fifty-four percent of these jars exhibit moderate to heavy external use-wear, and at least 23% show reslipping/repainting layers interpreted as renewal over time (Crown and Wills Reference Crown and Wills2003), so at least some were used on multiple occasions. If all vessels were used at once, the number of participants would have been quite large. But the designs are not all contemporaneous, suggesting that more jars were put into use over time. The presence of jars of Showlow Red, Black Mesa Black-on-white, and Chuska White Ware supports the idea that drinking events included participants from outside the canyon. Toll suggested that “cylinder jars were produced by communities of the Chaco system and were placed in its most significant structure as expressions of participation” (1990:296), with the number of jars representing the number of participating communities in the system at AD 1100.

Cylinder jars are often found in association with sandstone discs believed to be jar lids (Pepper Reference Pepper1920). The association of cylinder jars with sandstone jar lids suggests the possibility that Chacoans preferred their drinks hot, with the lids used to retain heat. Experimental work comparing heat retention in cylinder jars, jars with necks, and bowls with identical volumes confirms that the cylinder form has superior heat retention (Figure 6). Eighty-six percent of the cylinder vessels have lugs (small loops or knobs attached to the side of the vessel) of various shapes and numbers. It is possible that the lugs were used to tie down the jar lids, and, indeed, one jar has an inner lip positioned to accept a jar lid. Alternatively, string threaded through the lugs (or, for six vessels, holes) might have been used for suspension of the jars. But many of the lugs are completely appended to the vessel wall, so that nothing could be attached to them, and some lugs are too fragile for attachments. Most lugs show no wear or polish suggestive of use (Washburn Reference Washburn, Riley and Hedrick1980:79–80). Lugs may have been purely decorative or perhaps used to attach ornaments or feathers to the pots.

Figure 6. Results of a heat retention experiment on three ceramic vessels with identical volume (1,000 cc) but different shapes, showing change in temperature over time for 237 cc of boiling water to cool to room temperature (experiment performed and figure created by Jill Jordan).

The cylinder jar shape, distinct in any Chaco assemblage, was likely made for public display and to be recognized at a distance. At times when cacao or holly was scarce, holding a cylinder jar might have reminded viewers of this exotic luxury drink (van der Veen Reference van der Veen2003). While the decorated jars are mostly within the Gallup/Chaco Black-on-white canon, the variety of designs, shape profiles, and lug shapes suggest the importance of differentiating the drinkers (Hamilakis Reference Hamilakis, Hitchcock, Laffineur and Crowley2008:11). About one-third of the vessels were plain white when found but may have once been decorated with bright postfiring pigment designs on stucco, based on the finding of plaster still adhering to some and the discovery of Pueblo Bonito sherds covered with plaster colored with powdered turquoise or hematite (Crown and Wills Reference Crown and Wills2003).

Cylinder jar sherds are difficult to differentiate from pitcher sherds, so we do not know exactly how many broken cylinder jars were discarded in trash middens, but some unquestionably were (Crown Reference Crown and Crown2016b). All but five of the roughly 200 cylinder vessels with known proveniences were recovered in Chaco Canyon, and around 175 come from Pueblo Bonito (Table 1; Figure 7). None were recovered from kivas. While 20 come from rooms that have burials, only one was directly associated with an individual burial, an adult female (Skeleton #5/H3663 in Room 33, 40–50 years of age [Marden Reference Marden2011:566]), with the Puerco Black-on-white cylinder jar (H3637) found resting on her occipital (Akins Reference Akins1986).

Table 1. Cylinder Jar Proveniences.

^a Rooms combined because of problems with the excavations.

Figure 7. Locations of cylinder jars recovered in Pueblo Bonito rooms, indicated by gray shading; Room 28 is located at the northern edge of the West Court (figure created by Drew Wills).

Cylinder jars primarily come from the same two types of ceremonial or performative deposits described above for pitchers: placement blocking doorways (possibly guardians, as described above) and deanimation by smashing or burning. In some Pueblo Bonito rooms, individuals terminated cylinder jars by smashing them on a surface (10 were smashed on the upper-story floor of Room 28). The most extreme cylinder jar termination consists of 102 vessels executed in Room 28 in Pueblo Bonito. Recent reexcavation of the room shows that around AD 1100, individuals placed 99 of the jars on a shelf in this room, sprinkled them with turquoise and shell beads, and lit a large fire under the shelf. The room doors were sealed, some with vessels blocking them. The room burned and collapsed over the jars. The cylinder jars and the room in which they were housed probably required deanimation and destruction when the jars were taken out of circulation. The 19 vessels found in burial rooms but not associated with individuals might have been general offerings to the group or room or terminated through burial. The discard patterns of cylinder jars thus suggest that they were not the property of individuals or households (i.e., a domestic, residential unit). Instead, they likely belonged to a corporate group that stored the vessels in Room 28.

By the time Room 28 was used for storing the cylinder jars, it was an underground room that had a stairway up to the West Court of Pueblo Bonito. As Mills (Reference Mills, Mills and Walker2008:105) notes, the storage of most cylinder jars adjacent to the West Court suggests their use in that space. Given the number of jars and the proximity to this open area, the consumption practices associated with cylinder jars probably involved ceremonial processions there, patterning seen in other parts of the world (Knappett Reference Knappett2011:163).

The presence of cylinder jars at the same time that pitchers were in use indicates intensified drinking activity at Pueblo Bonito, with feasts or rituals surrounding drinking becoming more common there. In this setting, having such visually distinctive drinking forms may have been an important means of differentiation. Drinking activity may have become competitive either within Pueblo Bonito or among the Great Houses within the canyon, with factions vying for followers. Consumption involving the cylinder jars was centered on Pueblo Bonito and was apparently successful in drawing participants from a distance for some decades in the late AD 1000s. The burial of an adult female with a cylinder jar suggests that the drinking events involved both women and men. The dramatic termination of the cylinder jars around AD 1100 indicates an abrupt end to their use in ritual drinking. While independent evidence suggests the destruction of Room 28 around AD 1100, one Chaco-McElmo Black-on-white and one Nava Black-on-white are the latest vessels there, dating to AD 1100–1275, confirming an end to vessel production in the first years of the twelfth century.

As distinctive as cylinder jars were, they were neither widely traded prestige items nor widely emulated or copied. A few potters at distant villages created cylinder jars, but based on the relative absence of cylinder jars outside of Chaco Canyon, almost all of those vessels were then brought to Pueblo Bonito rather than kept locally. So few Chacoan cylinder jars exist outside of Pueblo Bonito that there must have been control over their creation and use (see also Toll Reference Toll, Duran and Kirkpatrick1990:296).

This patterning contrasts with Maya practices. At feasts among the Classic Maya (AD 250–900), elites provided cacao drinks to guests and then gifted the drinking vessels, cylinder jars with elaborately painted scenes (Reents-Budet Reference Reents-Budet and McNeil2006:222). Both drink and container had value, established social ties, and affirmed social distinction. In contrast, outsiders brought cylinder jars to Pueblo Bonito, where they remained. Perhaps gifting the vessels provided entrée for these outsiders. Even the disintegration of the Chaco system did not lead to emulation elsewhere. Indeed, the termination of the cylinder jars appears to have been accompanied by the complete rejection of this form. The only known cylinder jar that postdates the destruction of Room 28 is a recently discovered Tusayan Polychrome (dated AD 1125–1290) from a site in northeastern Arizona (Kelley Hays-Gilpin, personal communication 2017).

Mugs appear in Chaco at about the time that cylinder jars disappear. The mugs are small, handled vessels about the size of a modern coffee mug but with a smaller orifice than base. These personal drinking vessels continue the pattern of increasingly smaller drinking vessels over time at Pueblo Bonito. There are a few Chaco-McElmo Black-on-white mugs (AD 1100–1150) and a possibly locally produced version of McElmo Black-on-white, but other mugs found in Chaco were made in the Mesa Verde area. Several researchers have argued that such mugs developed from Chacoan square-shouldered pitchers (Bradley Reference Bradley1996; Judd Reference Judd1954:203; Toll and McKenna Reference Toll, McKenna and Mathien1997:68), as a replacement/alternative to pitchers. In the Mesa Verde area, Bradley argues that the mug form “did not serve as an everyday drinking vessel, but functioned primarily in ritual activities” (1996:248). But based on a large-scale study, Putsavage (Reference Putsavage2008) argues that mugs were personal serving vessels used for a variety of drinks. Residue analysis of mugs from Chaco, Aztec Ruins, and southwestern Colorado suggests that some had cacao residue (Crown et al. Reference Crown, Gu, Jeffrey Hurst, Ward, Bravenec, Ali, Kebert, Berch, Redman, Lyons, Merewether, Phillips, Reed and Woodson2015). So, the consumption of caffeinated drinks did not cease with the termination of the cylinder jars. The five mugs from Pueblo Bonito occur in rooms without burials (Pepper Reference Pepper1920), but mugs do occur in burials at other Chacoan sites, as well as in trash mounds and as vessels blocking doorways (Figure 8).

Figure 8. Drinking vessel forms found in three contexts in Pueblo Bonito, showing the high incidence of cylinder jars in rooms and pitchers in burials and trash mounds (data from Crown Reference Crown and Crown2016b; Judd Reference Judd1954; Pepper Reference Pepper1920); the pitcher sherd category may include cylinder jars, which are difficult to separate in sherd form.

The sequence of drinking vessels in Chaco Canyon shows interesting patterns when viewed in broader perspective. The early sequence of tecomates and gourd effigies is present widely in the northern US Southwest and millennia earlier in Mesoamerica. The pitcher form is common throughout the northern US Southwest but is considerably less common among groups to the south and was probably an innovation of the northern potters. And while the cylinder jar form may mimic Mesoamerican forms using a local technology, the mug is also a distinctly northern US Southwest form probably developed first in the northern San Juan region around AD 1050 (Putsavage Reference Putsavage2008). Its presence in Chaco Canyon likely reflects the movement of people from northern San Juan into Chaco, together with their own drinking practices. Both pitchers and mugs were thus northern Ancestral Pueblo forms used as generalized personal drinking vessels. And while the cylinder jar was an addition to the existing vessel form repertoire at Pueblo Bonito, the mug was a replacement.