Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T18:17:03.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The D-VinCHI study: secondary analysis of vitamin D dietary intakes pre-2020 and post-2021

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2022

E. Royle
Affiliation:
Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health (NICHE), Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
LK. Pourshahidi
Affiliation:
Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health (NICHE), Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
EM. McSorley
Affiliation:
Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health (NICHE), Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
PJ. Magee
Affiliation:
Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health (NICHE), Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2022

Vitamin D is best known for its role in the prevention of rickets and osteomalacia and may have a protective role in non-communicable diseases(Reference Amrein, Scherkl and Hoffmann1). In the UK, low dietary intakes of vitamin D are evident in all age groups. Currently, 29–40% of children do not meet the reference nutrient intake of 10μg/day vitamin D from all dietary sources including from supplementation(2). The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the association between vitamin D and immune health in the popular media, this may have led to increased dietary intakes of vitamin D including from supplementation within the UK population. This study aimed to explore the vitamin D dietary intakes in children before and after the COVID-19 lockdown. A secondary analysis of the D-VinCHI study(Reference Glatt, McSorley and Pourshahidi3) was undertaken to compare healthy children aged 4–11 years old who completed the study before the initial COVID-19 lockdown (pre-March 2020) and post-COVID-19 lockdown (post- July 2021). Daily vitamin D dietary intakes were assessed using a retrospective vitamin D food frequency questionnaire(Reference Weir, Carson and Mulhern4). Contribution of different food groups to vitamin D intakes were also quantified. A total of 77 children were enrolled within the study between November 2019 and February 2022. The mean (± SD) age of participants was 8.12 (± 2.09) years and 45.5% were female. The mean (± SD) height and weight of participants were 133.36 (± 13.91) cm and 32.36 (± 11.79) kg respectively. The mean (± SD) body mass index (BMI) was 17.60 (± 3.19) kg/m2. An average intake of 6.15 (± 5.01) μg/day vitamin D from all dietary sources including from supplements was reported from all participants. No significant difference was observed in mean vitamin D intakes (diet and supplements) pre-COVID (6.4 μg/day) when compared to that determined post lockdown (5.8 μg/day).

Regular vitamin D supplementation was taken in 20.8% of participants and contributed a mean (± SD) 7.3 (± 5.20) μg/day to total vitamin D intakes. In total 19.5% of participants met the reference nutrient intake of 10μg/day from all dietary sources including supplements. The results of this secondary analysis show that dietary intakes of vitamin D have not increased from 2019–2022. The dietary intakes are still well below current government recommendations and suggests that further public health strategies are required to increase intake of vitamin D from all sources including (bio)fortified, dietary and supplementation.

Implementing policies to target those at risk of low vitamin D dietary intakes may alleviate the disparities in health found in those with vitamin D deficiency.

References

Amrein, K, Scherkl, M, Hoffmann, M, et al. (2020) Eur J Clin Nutr 74, 14981513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NDNS National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2019). [Available at: https://gov.uk/government/statistics/ndns-results-from-years-9-11-2016-2017 and-2018-to-2019].Google Scholar
Glatt, DU, McSorley, E, Pourshahidi, LK, et al. (2022) Nutrients 14, 804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, RR, Carson, EL, Mulhern, MS, et al. (2016) J Hum Nutr Diet 29, 255–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar