Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T21:06:28.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BMR in children with chronic kidney disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2009

C. E. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Southampton General Hospital, SouthamptonSO16 6YD, UK
R. Gilbert
Affiliation:
Department of Child Health, Southampton General Hospital, SouthamptonSO16 6YD, UK
M. Elia
Affiliation:
Department of Institute of Human Nutrition, Southampton General Hospital, SouthamptonSO16 6YD, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

The data on the effect of chronic kidney disease in children on BMR are conflicting, confusing and limited. This causes difficulty in calculating energy requirements. The aim of the present study was to 1) examine the extent to which BMR in children with CKD differs from that of healthy children and 2) to determine whether resting energy expenditure in a group of children with CKD differs from that of healthy children.

The present study involved twenty children with chronic renal failure and twenty control children who did not differ in age (years; 12.1 (sd 3.5) v. 11.8 (sd 3.3)), (weight (kg); 40.1 (sd 14.5) v. 46.3 (sd 16.8)) or (height (m); 1.46 (sd 0.2) v. 1.50 (sd 0.18)). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the renal group was 34 (sd 19.9) ml/min per 1.732. Z scores were significantly different for weight (−0.29 (sd 1.15) v. 0.66 (sd 0.99); P=0.007), and BMI (−0.99 (sd 1.1) v. 0.65 (sd 1.0) P=0.031) but not height (−0.32 (sd 1.22) v. (0.35 (sd 1.35)).

BMR was measured by indirect open circuit calorimetry using Deltatrack II (Datex-Ohmeda, Helsinki, Finland). Children were asked to fast overnight for 12 h and then rest for 30 min in a recumbent position prior to measurements of gaseous exchange. Readings were taken for 30 min in a quiet room with an ambient temperature of approximately 23°C. Energy expenditure was calculated using the equation of Elia and Livesey(Reference Elia and Livesey1). Predicted BMR was calculated using the Schofield equations for age, gender, weight and height(Reference Schofield2). The dry weight of children with chronic kidney disease was estimated by clinical examination by a consultant paediatric nephrologist. GFR was calculated using the Schwartz formula(Reference Schwartz, Haycock and Edelmann3, 4).

The results show (1) GFR was significantly related to BMR (R 2=0.261, R=0.511, P=0.021) so that at a GFR of 0 BMR was 91% of predicted BMR and at a GFR of 70 BMR was 112% of predicted BMR. This could not be explained by nutritional status. Thus the significance of this relationship was 0.021 before adjustment for Z scores weight and height and 0.024 after adjustment. (2) There was no significant difference in measured BMR (kJ/d) between the renal and healthy groups either before (5431 (sd 1297) v. 5544 (sd 745); P=0.736) or after adjustment for age and gender (5435 (se 192) v. 5586 (se 197); P=0.588). BMR, as a percentage of Schofield predicted values, also did not differ between groups (100 (sd 13) v. 99 (sd 13); P=0.768).

In conclusion, although the BMR of this group of children with chronic renal failure did not differ from that of normal children, this was lower in more severe renal disease (lower GFR), and needs consideration when estimating the energy requirements of children with severe chronic renal failure whose growth is of concern. Consideration also needs to be given to the effects of CKD on total energy expenditure, which includes physical activity.

The Health Foundation funded this project.

References

1. Elia, M & Livesey, G (1992) World Rev Nutr Diet 70, 68131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Schofield, WN (1985) Clin Nutr 39C, Suppl. 1, 541.Google Scholar
3. Schwartz, GJ, Haycock, GB, Edelmann, CM Jr et al. . (1976) Pediatrics 58, 259263.Google Scholar
4. K/DOQI (2000) Clinical Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease: Evaluation, Classification, and Stratification. www.kidney.org/Professionals/Kdoqi/guidelines (accessed June 2005).Google Scholar