Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:59:22.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Employing a generic dietary multivitamin-mineral supplement to estimate intake in a population of pregnant women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2015

H. Clark
Affiliation:
Public Health Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD
D. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Child Health, Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital, Aberdeen AB25 2ZL
G. Devereux
Affiliation:
Department of Child Health, Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital, Aberdeen AB25 2ZL
J. Kyle
Affiliation:
Public Health Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 

It is estimated that 33% of the UK adult population regularly use dietary supplements(Reference Bates, Lennox and Swan1). When estimating nutrient intake in a population this additional source of vitamins and minerals can substantially increase consumption(Reference Haugen, Brantsæter, Alexander and Meltzer2). A major challenge of estimating nutrient intake from dietary supplements is incomplete brand information supplied by study participants to allow exact identification of the supplement. To avoid underestimation of intake caused by missing data, previous studies have used a generic supplement generated for the population under investigation(Reference Lentjes, Bhaniani, Mulligan, Khaw and Welch3). The aim of this work is to investigate the effect of applying a generic pregnancy multivitamin-mineral supplement (MVMS) to estimate the nutrient intake of pregnant women reporting taking a MVMS compared to intake calculated using reported branded supplements.

Data was collected from 152 pregnant women participating in a study assessing Vitamin D and E intake. Dietary and supplement information was collected using the Scottish Collaborative Group's FFQ (v6·6) (4). A ‘generic’ MVMS was created using the weighted average of the nutrient composition of reported supplements. Supplement intakes were then calculated using both the reported brand, and the generic supplement nutrient compositions. The calculated nutrient intakes for each method were then compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Ninety two women reported taking a MVMS designed for use in pregnancy. A core set of 14 nutrients were included in the majority of branded supplements (Vitamins D, E, C, B1, B2, B3, B6, B12, folic acid, Fe, Mg, Zn, pantothenoic acid and biotin); the other 5 nutrients (Vitamin K, Se, I, Cu and Ca) were less frequently included. Median intakes calculated by the specific and generic methods were found to be significantly different for vitamins D, E, C, B2, B3 and K, Se, I, pantothenoic acid, biotin, Cu and Ca (p < 0·05), but not for the remaining nutrients (p > 0·05, table 1).

Table 1. Comparison of branded and generic supplement intakes

* No. of women taking nutrient from branded supplement.

In conclusion, employing a generic supplement to estimate nutrient intake from supplements should be used with caution as it may not produce a reliable estimate of intake.

References

1.Bates, B, Lennox, A, Swan, G (2010) The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Headline Results From Year 1 of the Rolling Programme (2008/2009). London, UK: Food Standards Agency.Google Scholar
2.Haugen, M, Brantsæter, AL, Alexander, J, Meltzer, HM (2008) Ann Nutr Metab 52, 272280Google Scholar
3.Lentjes, MAH, Bhaniani, A, Mulligan, AA, Khaw, K, Welch, AW (2010) Public Health Nutr 14, 459471Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Comparison of branded and generic supplement intakes