Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T10:29:33.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The internal validity obsession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2022

Gregory Mitchell Open the ORCID record for Gregory Mitchell [Opens in a new window]  and
Philip E. Tetlock Open the ORCID record for Philip E. Tetlock [Opens in a new window]
Gregory Mitchell
Affiliation:
University of Virginia, School of Law, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USAgreg.mitchell@law.virginia.edu; https://www.law.virginia.edu/faculty/profile/pgm6u/1191856
Philip E. Tetlock
Affiliation:
Psychology Department and Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Solomon Labs, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. tetlock@wharton.upenn.edu; https://www.sas.upenn.edu/tetlock/bio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Until social psychology devotes as much attention to construct and external validity as it does to internal validity, the field will continue to produce theories that fail to replicate in the field and cannot be used to meliorate social problems.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e83
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aronson, E. R., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1968). Experimentation in social psychology. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–79). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Banaji, M. R. & Crowder, R. C. (1989). The bankruptcy of everyday memory. American Psychologist, 44, 1185–1193. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chester, D. S., & Lasko, E. M. (2021). Construct validation of experimental manipulations in social psychology: Current practices and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16, 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620950684CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appsy.2004.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, G. (2012). Revisiting truth or triviality: The external validity of research in the psychological laboratory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paluck, E. L., Porat, R., Clark, C. S., & Green, D. P. (2021). Prejudice reduction: Progress and challenges. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 533–560. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-071620-030619CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schimmack, U. (2021). The implicit association test: A method in search of a construct. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16, 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619863798CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed