Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:51:51.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Processing foreign-accented speech in a second language: Evidence from ERPs during sentence comprehension in bilinguals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2018

SARAH GREY ,
LAURA C. SCHUBEL ,
JAMES M. MCQUEEN  and
JANET G. VAN HELL
SARAH GREY*
Affiliation:
Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, Fordham University
LAURA C. SCHUBEL
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, George Washington University
JAMES M. MCQUEEN
Affiliation:
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen
JANET G. VAN HELL
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Center for Language Science, Pennsylvania State University
*
Address for correspondence: Sarah Grey, Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, Faber Hall 556, Fordham University, Bronx, NY 10458sgrey4@fordham.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined electrophysiological correlates of sentence comprehension of native-accented and foreign-accented speech in a second language (L2), for sentences produced in a foreign accent different from that associated with the listeners' L1. Bilingual speaker-listeners process different accents in their L2 conversations, but the effects on real-time L2 sentence comprehension are unknown. Dutch–English bilinguals listened to native American-English accented sentences and foreign (and for them unfamiliarly-accented) Chinese-English accented sentences while EEG was recorded. Behavioral sentence comprehension was highly accurate for both native-accented and foreign-accented sentences. ERPs showed different patterns for L2 grammar and semantic processing of native- and foreign-accented speech. For grammar, only native-accented speech elicited an Nref. For semantics, both native- and foreign-accented speech elicited an N400 effect, but with a delayed onset across both accent conditions. These findings suggest that the way listeners comprehend native- and foreign-accented sentences in their L2 depends on their familiarity with the accent.

Keywords

foreign accentsentence comprehensionsecond languageERPsgrammarsemantics
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , November 2019 , pp. 912 - 929
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by NSF SMA-1514276/1659920 to Sarah Grey and Janet G. van Hell and NSF OISE-0968369, NSF BCS 1349110, and OISE 1545900 to Janet G. van Hell. Portions of this research were presented at the 2016 meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society. We thank Courtney Johnson-Fowler, Yiran Zhang, Abigail L. Cosgrove, Carrie Jackson, Kaitlyn Litcofsky, and Tim Poepsel for assistance with this project. We thank Darren Tanner and Katharina Schumann for helpful input on a previous version of the manuscript.

References

Batterink, L., & Neville, H. (2013). Implicit and explicit second language training recruit common neural mechanisms for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25 (6), 936–951.Google Scholar
Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R. (2003). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 1600.Google Scholar
Bent, T., & Holt, R. F. (2013). The influence of talker and foreign-accent variability on spoken word identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133 (3), 1677–1686.Google Scholar
Bosker, H. R., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & de Jong, N. H. (2014). Native ‘um's elicit prediction of low-frequency referents, but non-native ‘um's do not. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 104–116.Google Scholar
Bowden, H. W., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2013). Native-like brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners. Neuropsychologia, 51 (13), 2492–2511.Google Scholar
Cristia, A., Seidl, A., Vaughn, C., Schmale, R., Bradlow, A., & Floccia, C. (2012). Linguistic processing of accented speech across the lifespan. Frontiers in psychology, 3.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990-present. Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D. (2007). The ‘good enough'approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1 (1‐2), 71–83.Google Scholar
Filik, R., Sanford, A. J., & Leuthold, H. (2008). Processing pronouns without antecedents: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20 (7), 1315–1326.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97 (5), 3125–3134.Google Scholar
Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2010). The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14 (2), 214–237.Google Scholar
Goslin, J., Duffy, H., & Floccia, C. (2012). An ERP investigation of regional and foreign accent processing. Brain and Language, 122 (2), 92–102.Google Scholar
Grey, S., Tanner, D., & Van Hell, J. G. (2017). How right is left? Handedness modulates neural responses during morphosyntactic processing. Brain Research, 1669, 27–43.Google Scholar
Grey, S., & Van Hell, J. G. (2017). Foreign-accented speaker identity affects neural correlates of sentence comprehension. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 42, 93–108.Google Scholar
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Processing a second language: Late learners' comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 123–141.Google Scholar
Hanulíkova, A., van Alphen, P. M., van Goch, M. M., & Weber, A. (2012). When one person's mistake is another's standard usage: The effect of foreign accent on syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24 (4), 878–887.Google Scholar
Hanulíkova, A., & Weber, A. (2012). Sink positive: Linguistic experience with th substitutions influences nonnative word recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74 (3), 613–629.Google Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., Smith, B. L., Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R. (2008). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for native speakers of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts. Journal of phonetics, 36 (4), 664–679.Google Scholar
Imai, S., Walley, A. C., & Flege, J. E. (2005). Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117 (2), 896–907.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21 (1), 60–99.Google Scholar
Kaan, E. (2007). Event-related potentials and language processing: A brief overview. Language and Linguistics Compass, 571–591.Google Scholar
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the the N400 component of the event-related brain potential Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647.Google Scholar
Larraza, S., Samuel, A. G., & Oñederra, M. L. (2016). Listening to accented speech in a second language: First language and age of acquisition effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42 (11), 1774.Google Scholar
Larraza, S., & Best, C. T. (2017). Differences in phonetic-to-lexical perceptual mapping of L1 and L2 regional accents. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–21.Google Scholar
Lev‐Ari, S., Heugten, M., & Peperkamp, S. (2017). Relative difficulty of understanding foreign accents as a marker of proficiency. Cognitive Science, 41 (4), 1106– 1118.Google Scholar
Luo, L., Luk, G., & Bialystok, E. (2010). Effect of language proficiency and executive control on verbal fluency performance in bilinguals. Cognition, 114, 29–41.Google Scholar
Machado, S., Duarte, E., Teles, J., Reis, L., & Rebelo, F. (2012). Selection of a voice for a speech signal for personalized warnings: The effect of speaker's gender and voice pitch. Work, 41 (Supplement 1), 3592–3598.Google Scholar
Marian, V., & Shook, A. (2012). The cognitive benefits of being bilingual. Paper presented at the Cerebrum: the Dana forum on brain science.Google Scholar
Morgan-Short, K. (2014). Electrophysiological approaches to understanding second language acquisition: A field reaching its potential. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 15–36.Google Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24 (4), 933–947.Google Scholar
Mueller, J. L. (2005). Electrophysiological correlates of second language processing. Second Language Research, 21 (2), 152–174.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995a). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45 (1), 73–97.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995b). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38 (3), 289–306.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Morton, S. L. (2006). The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 (1), 111–131.Google Scholar
Nieuwland, M. S. (2014). “Who's he?” Event-related brain potentials and unbound pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 1–28.Google Scholar
Ojima, S., Nakata, H., & Kakigi, R. (2005). An ERP study on second language learning after childhood: Effects of proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 (8), 1212–1228.Google Scholar
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9 (1), 97–113.Google Scholar
Osterhout, L., & Nicol, J. (1999). On the distinctiveness, independence, and time course of the brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14 (3), 283–317.Google Scholar
Porretta, V., Tremblay, A., & Bolger, P. (2017). Got experience? PMN amplitudes to foreign-accented speech modulated by listener experience. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 54–67.Google Scholar
Romero-Rivas, C., Martin, C. D., & Costa, A. (2015). Processing changes when listening to foreign-accented speech. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 9.Google Scholar
Romero-Rivas, C., Martin, C. D., & Costa, A. (2016). Foreign-accented speech modulates linguistic anticipatory processes. Neuropsychologia, 85, 245–255.Google Scholar
Samuel, A. G., & Larraza, S. (2015). Does listening to non-native speech impair speech perception? Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 51–71.Google Scholar
Schertz, J., & Hawthorne, K. (2018). The effect of sentential context on phonetic categorization is modulated by talker accent and exposure. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143 (3), EL231–EL236.Google Scholar
Strange, W. (1995). Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research: York Press.Google Scholar
Swaab, T. Y., Ledoux, K., Camblin, C. C., & Boudewyn, M. A. (2012). Language-related ERP components. Oxford handbook of event-related potential components, 397–440.Google Scholar
Tolentino, L., & Tokowicz, N. (2011). Across language, space, and time: A review of the role of cross-language similarity in L2 (morpho)syntactic processing as revealed by fMRI and ERP methods. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 91–125.Google Scholar
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Zwitserlood, P. (2003). Event‐related brain potentials reflect discourse‐referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 40 (2), 235–248.Google Scholar
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Zwitserlood, P., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2004). So who's" he" anyway? Differential ERP and ERSP effects of referential success, ambiguity and failure during spoken language comprehension. Supplement to the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 70.Google Scholar
van Heugten, M., & Johnson, E. K. (2014). Learning to contend with accents in infancy: Benefits of brief speaker exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143 (1), 340.Google Scholar
Van Hell, J. G., & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: Syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 26 (1), 43–74.Google Scholar
Van Hell, J. G., Verhoeven, L., Tak, M., & van Oosterhout, M. (2005). To take a stance: A developmental study of the use of pronouns and passives in spoken and written narrative and expository texts in Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics, 37 (2), 239–273.Google Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50 (1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Weber, A., Di Betta, A. M., & McQueen, J. M. (2014). Treak or trit: Adaptation to genuine and arbitrary foreign accents by monolingual and bilingual listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 46, 34–51.Google Scholar
Witteman, M. J., Weber, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2013). Foreign accent strength and listener familiarity with an accent codetermine speed of perceptual adaptation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 1–20.Google Scholar
Xie, X., & Fowler, C. A. (2013). Listening with a foreign-accent: The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit in Mandarin speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 41 (5), 369–378.Google Scholar